What other implication is there? Your whole comment is libtard fake environmentalism screed then you say that with more non-whites the situation will improve. What else could this possibly mean? How fucking stupid are you?

What in the name of God are you talking about? Link me to something or expand on your theory. These statements make absolutely no sense and you are doing a very poor job of explaining them.

Not a theory, this is basic history literally everyone who is even passingly familiar with anything to do with environmentalism knows. Its origins was the romantic nationalist movements of the 19th century, the only environmentalist state in history was the Third Reich. Post-war all environmentalism was bought out by capitalists and liberalised because real environmentalism, which is nationalistic, is a threat to capitalism. Whereas the fake environmentalism you advocate for is actually just a tool of capital. A famous example being when Global Warming was popularised in the 80s it was used by the likes of M*rgaret Th*tcher to deindustrialise the west and instead move capital into the third world, this gave capitalists cheaper labour as they could exploit foreigners as well as decimating the working class in the North and Midlands of England which have never really recovered.

There's a book that details how Earth First! was liberalised and turned into the kind of fake, neoliberal, environmentalism you're advocating. There's also the famous anecdote about the Sierra Club receiving $200million to stop opposing immigration. Every time environmentalism gets serious, which inevitably means it becomes nationalistic, it gets taken over by money and morphed into the nonsense neoliberal 'environmentalism' which just means wealth transfers from ordinary white people to international finance, increasing total global consumption through industrialising the third world etc.

If you look into famous conservationists you will find people who were very nationalistic, into racialism, eugenics etc. Of the ones who weren't Volkisch/Romantic Nationalists, most were part of the Progressive movement which had a lot of similarities with National Socialism.

I literally googled 'history of environmentalism' and the first thing I found is saying the same thing I'm saying. Hardly a 'theory', more just common knowledge amongst everyone who is actually into ecology