What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not common sense. It's an opinion. And who said I don't want to be "harmed"? People make me want to bang my head against a wall and cut myself, which I do, and I still get in useless "discussions" with them

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Centrists are like that. They are too alt-right to be leftist and too leftist to be alt-right

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is utter nonsense. People don't have "god-given" rights. And authoritarianism isn't "wrong" in and of itself. We decide whether or not something is wrong

You decided it's wrong. I decided it isn't. Both libertarianism and authoritarianism are synonymous with breach of "right" to liberty. You "force" yourself on authoritarians, not letting them do what they want to do. Authoritarians "force" themselves on you, not letting you do what you want to do. I would go as far as to say libertarianism is authoritarian. Own up to it

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Says a leftist nut

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What if you could please yourself and other people? Or at the very least please yourself without harming others?

That wouldn't be interesting

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're an outlier. Outliers don't disprove the dichotomy that works for most people

You shared your story, and I shared mine. Your story doesn't matter to me, when mine doesn't matter to you

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish I were a "god," then I could do whatever I want to other people

... selfishness

I can only please one person per day and everyday I choose me

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's ridiculous. The person who is most like me out of anyone I've ever met is the same sex

The new PM of Italy looks like the solution all the world needs right now: a near-perfect anti-globalist nationalist leader. by iamonlyoneman in politics

[–]KimiORabu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Being opposed to a literal emotion is childish and stupid

Being opposed to gay people is childish and stupid, but if you get to loathe and despise them for what they do, please expect to be loathed and despised for what you do and how you feel

You call them "fags," vote against gay marriage, etc. We ask you to choke on your words and shove your heads in the toilet instead. Don't want to be told what to do? Don't tell gay people what to do

There is nothing wrong (or preventable) regarding so-called 'hate' per se

Then there's nothing wrong with hating anti-gay people such as yourself. We can loathe and despise whoever we want, and there's nothing you can do about it. You understand that, right?

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's the spirit!

Birds of a feather flock together. People of the same type, race and "gender," are to mutually associate

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I seek to control people as little as possible

Not how morality works

And how a far-right person can be against "controlling" other people is beyond me. You're confusing libertarianism with far-right or extreme supremacism

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why race and not "gender"?

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The belief that "it's immoral to have such control over other people's very existence" is a belief like any other. You "control" other people with this arbitrary morality. There's no reason why I shouldn't do the same

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]KimiORabu[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Inequality of opportunity is always immoral. To say otherwise is to appoint yourself as a god

That doesn't make sense to me

Judging from the posts here, the far-right shouldn't believe inequality to be immoral

I'm non-binary between TRA and TERF by AllieKate in GenderCritical

[–]KimiORabu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I reject the idea that we can be wrong about some things, when we know we are wrong about said things

You're not confronting and resolving the issues of "gender identity" ideology, but diverting attention away from these issues and giving up on becoming a better version of yourselves

Give TRAs an inch and they'll take a mile. There can be no nuance or compromise

Don't expect us to let anyone, minor or adult, mutilate themselves, lie about their basic identities and invade the spaces of the opposite-sex, please. You'd be asking for too much

Does dysfunction affect the definitions of male and female? by KimiORabu in GenderCritical

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I lost my leg the war! Humans have two legs! I'm not human anymore! AGGGHH!

Good analogy. I doubt this person would claim someone who lost a leg is not human eventhough bipedalism is a human characteristic. These pseudo-intellectuals only target sex. Not other categories

Does dysfunction affect the definitions of male and female? by KimiORabu in GenderCritical

[–]KimiORabu[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

... parents and parental responsibilities

... slaves to dysfunctional sexual drives and elimination of family bonds

You sound like a conservative Christian not going to lie

I can't take conservatives seriously. GC and conservativism are at odds with each other. Conservatives want to be able to define women so that women can be "slaves" to traditional family and "gender" roles. GC want to be able to define women so that women can be free of traditional family and "gender" roles

But, welcome back, troll

Huh! Anyone asking a question is a troll. Gotcha

What happened to LGBdroptheT? by [deleted] in Lesbians

[–]KimiORabu 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Stop writing essays. Noone in their right mind has the time and energy to read ... whatever this is

95% of the population is estimated to be heterosexual. It is the default

Y'all repeat the number like you're bible thumping evangelicals

I don't believe the majority are "straight". They may feel or identify as such. Doesn't make it true. Anecdotes aren't reliable evidence

There is no objective method that can identify someone's "sexuality". You're left with subjective, biased self-reports

You're not even consistent with the self-reports. Non-western countries have no words for "sexuality". It's the west that invented "straight" and "gay" boxes. For self-reports, you "impose" western constructs on non-western countries to question their "identity" and receive more biased results

I believe "sexuality" is socially constructed and influenced by environment/culture. Everyone would be able to form gay relationships in a gay-friendly society. This society isn't gay-friendly. The majority consciously or unconsciously hate on their gay desires. Of course they would claim to be anything but gay

"Straight" is not the default. We are not computer programs. Whoever accused y'all of homophobia was right

My 1 year old son

Oh look! A breeder is in a lesbian space to push their homophobic agenda. What more did I expect from a breeder

"Trans-identified" people are more tolerated than gay people in socially conservative countries by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. "Third gender/trans" is homophobic and was historically used to target gay people. Gay men would be brainwashed to believe they are "not men", and gay women would be brainwashed to believe they are "not women".

It's their way of "transing the gay away".

"Trans-identified" people are more tolerated than gay people in socially conservative countries by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tMTI-D7DBQ

"Trans-identified" people are not directly involved in the video. A "cross-dresser" is involved. And it's the reactions he receives that are frustrating: "you look more like a girl than a girl is", "are you trans? Did you become a girl? Do you want to undergo surgery?".

The message this sends seems to be that "trans-identified" people are more tolerated in socially conservative countries (e.g. japan, china, korea, thailand, etc). Would there be such a positive reaction for an openly gay man? Wouldn't an openly gay man be asked problematic, homophobic questions? Gay marriage is illegal in korea and openly gay people face legal challenges. But in this video, korean people did not react as negatively to a potential* "trans-identified" man. They pushed him towards surgery.

This becomes more clear in dramas and movies. There are openly "trans-identified" characters in mainstream "kdramas" and "kmovies", and barely any openly gay characters that are as paid attention to.

See "Itaewon Class" and "Lady Daddy". "Itaewon Class" was the talk of the town and one of the highest rated dramas in ktelevision.

See "Come Back Mister" in which a man "arrives" in "afterlife" and returns to reconcile with his "wife" as a woman. The homophobic audience did not mind because "it's a man in a woman's body kissing a woman. It's not gay", and we know "a man in a woman's body" or "a woman in a man's body" comes from "trans-identified" people's claims that "a trans man is a man in a woman's body" or "a trans woman is a woman in a man's body".

*The "cross-dresser" may or may not undergo surgery. He is a potential "trans-identified" man for now.

"Gay people are homophobic because they are not interested in the opposite sex" by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This man shouldn't be anywhere near gay people. He should be in jail.

Do you think there's a way for his career to be taken away?

how/where did you stumble upon this guy's website...?

It was purely a coincidence. I was searching for pro-gay articles, and instead got anti-gay articles (my middle finger to google).

"Gay people are homophobic because they are not interested in the opposite sex" by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's similar to "trans right activist" claims such as "a trans woman is a woman inside a man's body" and "a trans man is a man inside a woman's body". And gay people are the ones that are targeted, as if "trans right activists" stole conservative, religious, homophobic claims to push their agenda (and they did).

"Gay people are homophobic because they are not interested in the opposite sex" by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Original link: https://kevinfitzmaurice.com/free-stuff/free-stuff-miscellaneous/homosexuals/

To read further, click on "3 points"

Homosexuals Are Homophobic

There is no one more homophobic than homosexuals.

This is proven by their actions, not their words.

There is no one more rejecting of homosexuals’ claims to be a different sex than homosexuals.

This is proven by their actions, not their words.

Neither male nor female homosexuals are willing to recognize that the other is the sex that they believe that they are.

Examples

For instance, a female homosexual who believes that she is really a man is not interested in a male homosexual who believes that he is really a woman. No, she only wants the real thing.

For instance, a male homosexual who believes that he is really a woman is not interested in a female homosexual who believes that she is really a man. No, he only wants the real thing.

Since homosexuals clearly demonstrate by their behavior that they do not believe the claims of other homosexuals–then why should anyone else believe their hypocritical claims.

You simply do not see male homosexuals pursuing female homosexuals or female homosexuals pursuing male homosexuals.

Contradictions

However, female homosexuals who consider themselves male never consider themselves male homosexuals. That is, women who claim to be men never claim to be gay men defying their belief that some men will always be gay.

However, male homosexuals who consider themselves female never consider themselves female homosexuals. That is, men who claim to be women never claim to be gay women defying their belief that some women will always be gay.

You simply do not see female homosexuals pursuing men or male homosexuals pursuing women.

We don't get paid enough to put up with their homophobia by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

It was very late at night for me too. Having a conversation with this woman that thinks she's a man was a nightmare 💀

We don't get paid enough to put up with their homophobia by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I wish 😭 ✋

I demand for payment. The government should pay us all $30,000 everytime we deal with a "trans-identified" female or "trans-identified" male, because dealing with them is no easy task

"Trans identified" female being arrogant and full of herself by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do not pass as the opposite sex. Do not collect $300.

I have zero "trans" friends. I can't "befriend" someone from the "gender identity" cult. It would "damage" my own mental health.

Wouldn't give them a single cent even if they "passed", because no matter how much someone "passes", they can never be the opposite sex. "Passing" is lying. It's best not to help someone go around fooling everyone else into thinking they are something they are not 😂

Internalized homophobia, vagina envy, and misogyny among male TRAs by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The difference between your "it may have been easier in some areas, but I'm content with what I have" and their "it would be easier, which is why I fantasize about having a p-ssy and a dom that f-cks that p-ssy" is you move on, while these men don't. They steal the words we women use to describe ourselves, and get off on them (e.g. "boy p-ssy", "mangina", etc) because deep down, they despise themselves and the gay sex they have (trigger warning): https://www.reddit.com/r/FemBoys/comments/pxcp6e/ass_pussy/

That was linked in the thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/TopsAndBottoms/comments/pxei7z/comment/heooc4l/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

Their fetishization of women's bodies is misogynistic.

They are homophobic, envious of women's vaginas and oblivious to the fact that "a man with a vagina" is an oxymoron (and no, a "fleshlight" or a "neovagina" is not a vagina), something that violates the very definition of a male. They will never reach their scifi dream. It's best they accept themselves and who they are. That's what the gay rights movement is for after all, to accept who you are, not dwell on what you don't and can't have.

How about kiss my FAT ASS instead by Hannibalboy93 in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it would mean we are attracted to chimps too

Humans are apes, and chimps are one of our closest relatives, from our ape family. Shouldn't be surprising that humans, be they men or women, would be attracted to chimps.

I believe that test has merit. Although most humans are too homophobic to accept it, it may very well be that no woman or man is "straight" 😉

The wishful thinking of TRAs by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I had a conversation with salty for 3-4 days on reddit. It was a year ago, before lgbdropthet and gendercritical subs were banned.

Few things were more frustrating than re-running the same fight with salty who'd casually go on gay subreddits to call gay men names, and humiliate them for what they do in their bedroom.

Did the same on saidit, and I reported salty multiple times. Mods did nothing, until they did from the looks of it.

Here, you can see I was really mad at salty on my other account when I snapped months ago (I linked some of salty's homophobic comments at the end of it): https://saidit.net/s/LGBDropTheT/comments/6rpm/has_anyone_debunked_the_split_attraction_model/pw2v

The wishful thinking of TRAs by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Aww, don't cry :'(

It's saddening that the first "intersex" individual we interacted with turned out to be raging homophobe. Everytime salty opened that mouth of theirs, they convinced disbelieving holdouts that they are a pseudo-intellectual schmuck. Yes, they had interesting ideas sometimes. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

I hope we can find better "intersex" people to interact with down the road hugs you

Internalized homophobia, vagina envy, and misogyny among male TRAs by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Same. And sometimes I regret internet itself exists because it helps false information, degeneracy, and mental illness like this spread more easily ...

The wishful thinking of TRAs by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

shout out to s/OPPRESSED_REPTILIAN, wherever you are

Please don't shout out to that homophobe

The wishful thinking of TRAs by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's what salty emo lizard (the "intersex" user) got banned for? Salty should have been banned for calling all gay men "mentally ill pedophiles" (on both reddit and saidit) way before that. Mods let it go on reddit (and banned me for calling salty out on their homophobic nonsense). And they let it go on saidit for a long time. Reddit admins suspended salty temporarily, not permanently.

It's sad all it took was salty calling the saidit mods "pedophiles" directly 🤧

Internalized homophobia, vagina envy, and misogyny among male TRAs by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

True. Homophobes place "straight sex" on a pedestal and demean gay sex, eventhough most women can't "orgasm" during "straight sex".

People fall for the "trans", "gender identity" agenda because of envy and jealousy. They are not content with what they have. They want more. It's always, "me, me, me". "Why don't I have a vagina?", or "why don't I have a penis?".

If you pay attention to the comments, they claim the "perfect human form has both a penis and a vagina": https://www.reddit.com/r/TopsAndBottoms/comments/pxei7z/comment/hep9ct5/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

I definitely want both my penis AND a vagina. I'm a very greedy person who likes sex too much to compromise

Actually throw in boobs to the mix and you've got the perfect human form

https://www.reddit.com/r/TopsAndBottoms/comments/pxei7z/comment/henluu0/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

I was on one of the ftm trans subs, saw one guy had gotten bottom surgery but without a vagioplasty (bad spelling probably) and honestly, I loved the look of dick+balls+vulva & t-dick.

If that were the future of the human race I wouldn't hate it one bit.

Those supporting the "trans", "gender identity" agenda are miserable. Nothing is enough for them. They would strive for something more, e.g. "a human with double dick, double vagina, laser eyes", etc, etc, if their wish for "a human with a vagina and a penis" came true (which hopefully will not come true).

Internalized homophobia, vagina envy, and misogyny among male TRAs by KimiORabu in LGBDropTheT

[–]KimiORabu[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some of the people in that thread are gay men. Not all. There are comments left by "trans men" (women) and men who sleep with "trans men" (women) too (gross ...). "Trans right activists" have invaded the spaces of gay men and gay women. The sub, despite its name, is not for gay men anymore.

These men are jealous of vaginas because they don't require too much "prep" before so-called "sex", prep being the bathing and diet for instance, and wish they had so-called "vaginas" so they could have spontaneous so-called "sex" whenever they wanted.

They claim some men had "bottom surgery" to make their "dreams come true": https://www.reddit.com/r/TopsAndBottoms/comments/pxei7z/comment/heptsrh/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

I saw a guy on Twitter the other day who identifies as a man, I guess he’s cis, and had bottom surgery to have a vagina.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TopsAndBottoms/comments/pxei7z/comment/heojtjd/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

I always fantasize about having a vagina but remaining male. My wildest, biggest fantasy is having a full time Dom make me have bottom surgery. I'd love to just roleplay it too IRL or in chat.

They imagine they have "vaginas": https://www.reddit.com/r/TopsAndBottoms/comments/pxei7z/comment/henbihz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

I often fantasize I have a pussy as a guy and my top is fucking it. Part of the advantages would be lack of prep

https://www.reddit.com/r/TopsAndBottoms/comments/pxei7z/comment/henfdc6/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

i want to know the sensation eating the coochie. I used to watch a lot of porn video of man eating the box. I wanted to be women's place so bad.

There's too much internalized homophobia and vagina envy in the thread. I fear they will go full "trans identified" male

Don't worry about the Taliban ladies, just stop identifying as a woman by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]KimiORabu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only solution is humanity's extinction. At least 2,000 years of humanity brainwashing each other with religion, heterosexism, etc and it's still ongoing. I'd put an end to everyone else, and then myself, until nothing is left, if I were given access to the bombs. If there were a button that put an end to everyone and everything, that would be the ideal.

Don't worry about the Taliban ladies, just stop identifying as a woman by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]KimiORabu 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nobody goes to war to liberate another country.

That's why humanity is disgusting.

No only the "freedom bringing" country you want don't exist

Pay attention to the "if". It was a hypothetical scenario in which there is a good country that fights to liberate another country. Yes, it doesn't exist. Humans are disgusting creatures, and only go to war when they are hungry for more resources.

they could only bring more misery to the countries they are trying to "help"

You never know until you try. It's possible it will actually get them out of the misery they would be in had the war not occurred.

The US also trained, armed, and supported many of the Middle East warlords.

Yet another useless history lesson on western countries ruining other countries with religion, as though what they did to Africa wasn't enough of a lesson.

I disagree the Trans Cult is the result of the developed countries not having real problems.

There aren't as many problems, and so they make up their own imaginary problems. It's not an either/or situation. Both your and my position can be valid.

Don't worry about the Taliban ladies, just stop identifying as a woman by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]KimiORabu 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do think a war with the US and other western countries can make the westerners focus on big issues, and stop the "trans" cult. It's because westerners have no big issues, only first world problems like "which comes first: the cereal or the milk?", that they started making up new imaginary problems like "these kids are trans, they want to pee in the other bathrooms, okay!!!111", "omg that's cultural appropriation1111", etc.

But I agree on one thing with you: Western countries are infected with the "trans" cult and don't care about western women, how can they care about non-western ones? They don't care.

My point was if there were a good country not infected with the "trans" cult, that cared about its own people, as well as the people of another country which is invaded by the islamic groups, the only way to stop the invasion is to arrive in the country with their own troops. Of course, without raping the girls and women that you mentioned USA troops supposedly did. The troops would stay there to protect the country from the islamic groups.

Sadly, there is no such good country. Every country is infected with at least one issue. So no change will happen in Afghanistan. Girls and women will be held back from education if they don't cover themselves from head to toe. They will be raped within marriage because islam does not recognize marital rape - marital rape is legal in muslim countries as a result. They will be seen as second class citizens with no worth. And so on.

The "trans" cult is dangerous. And Islam is more dangerous than the "trans" cult.

Don't worry about the Taliban ladies, just stop identifying as a woman by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]KimiORabu 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The change you speak of can never come from within. Most of their population support women being oppressed like that. And when you give the power to Taliban, there's not much the rest of the population can do. Taliban don't hesitate to use whatever they have to crush the heads of those that get in their way. Everyone ends up shaking in fear. You underestimate the power of islamic groups. Perhaps you never experienced it - the true colors of islam. Or perhaps you did and happen to be one of those liberals that ignores the red flags for your political agenda.

Once an islamic group takes over a country, the country is doomed. Nothing can change it for the better, unless some outside country starts a war and takes over.

In the past 20 years, the only reason Taliban didn't dare intervene was because USA troops were in Afghanistan. With their withdrawal, it's game over.

I also don't see the point of comparing case to case. Just because women "suffer" in xyz country doesn't mean women should get over it in Afghanistan.