Where is the evidence for the claim that the left supports pedophilia?

submitted by IlorinYuri from self.debatealtright

Why does the far right claim the left wants to normalize pedophilia, when the only unironic advocates of pedophilia I have ever seen are far right incels?

Men who consider themselves involuntarily celibate or “incels” have become significantly more radicalized over the past year and a half and are seeking to normalize child rape, a new report says. The report by the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) new Quant Lab concludes an investigation that analyzed more than one million posts on an incel forum. It found a marked spike in conversations about mass murder and growing approval of sexually assaulting prepubescent girls, reports the Washington Post. Platforms including YouTube and Google, as well as internet infrastructure companies like Cloudflare, are enabling the growth of the forum, which is reportedly visited by 2.6 million people every month. “These businesses should make a principled decision to withdraw their services from sites causing such significant harm,” the report says.

https://www.ncja.org/crimeandjusticenews/incels-seeking-to-normalize-child-rape-digital-hate-group-says

all 24 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Incels are all turd worldies so it's no surprise, even then it's prolly just FBI agents posting their own thoughts. As everyone knows, the FBI is filled with subhumans.

As for the other shit, paedos were only kicked out of the gay movement in the 90s for optics reasons, and they're being brought back in already. This is common knowledge to anyone who has the most basic 101-tier knowledge of the sexual revolution.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly, the paedo stuff during the sexual revolution gave backlash, so they had to "tone it down"

[–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Incels are disproportionately brown so this checks out

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I've seen the stats but do you have a source? I want to save it

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363484489_Levels_of_Well-Being_Among_Men_Who_Are_Incel_Involuntarily_Celibate

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jews and sexual deviants both seem to compulsively molest children, and they make up the heads of the Leftist hydra. Deflecting and blaming "le evil righties" is a classic tactic from leftists, and it's just as incorrect and childish in this case as in any other.

The entire "incel" movement is anathema to the Dissident Right in general, as incels are an inherently leftist, nihilist phenomena. Calling incels "right wing" is utterly moronic and is done only pejoratively by leftist organizations to attack the right (which is ironic, since leftists claim that associations between them and pedophiles are pejorative, even when they are verifiably factual).

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Your mistake comes in assuming the 'left' is some type of organic group of independent voters that just comes together on some political platform. The left is 90% NPC and 10% cultural programmers. The culture programmers use the herd mentality of their political base to push the edges of social norms (with the end goal of destroying traditional societies European or anyone else in the crosshairs).

First it was women rights, black rights, then gays, then trans and the next step is pedophilia and bestiality. Of course all these movements weren't about rights. We know that because once these groups did have legal blockers removed they immediately started pushing for legal privilege disguised as rights. Of course pedophilia will be a hard sell consider it's universal historical taboo but that didn't stop gay or trans right movements. The jews that push these things don't stop until they're forced too.

If you want 'proof' I'd go back to the film industry of the 70's. It wasn't right wingers making all these edgy films with underage actresses. When I was getting redpilled on the gays I watched a documentary of a preacher that took an undercover camera to a gay bar. Almost everyone he talked to had had their first sexual 'experience' as children or adolescence and the men in the bar expressed deep desire to relive those experiences with 'youth'. They of course used tactful language but they were all talking about basically being molested and or raped and desiring to rape children and teens. It was disgusting and it really opened my mind to what's going on. Related Webm

LGBTQ and the movements that came before it weren't about 'rights'. Gay people already enjoy more rights and safety in western countries then any other place or any other time in history. No, the lgbt 'rights' were about being able to live degenerate lifestyles with more and more access to impressionable youth that they could convert through rape and molestation.

Even a casual look at the history of pro LGBT and pro pedophilia speakers you will uncover almost exclusively leftist Jews. The Jew Ginsberg ran the man boy love association. The Jew Foucault advocated for extreme degeneracy and sex with children. The Jew Ruth Bader Ginsberg (may she rest in hell) advocated for bringing the age of consent to 12. The Jew Woody Allen openly admitted his sexual exploits with a child in his care and kept a relationship with her into adulthood. Hollywood insider articles are written about this and nobody says a word.

Today the film industry dominated by leftists has continued to push sexualizing children. Here's one example. Netflix's Cuties is another. And then there's the countless drag shows and pride festivals* all over the country that allow children to be exposed to sexuality and many children are encouraged to mimic the degenerate promiscuous and unhealthy adult gay lifestyle behavior: see Devon is Amazing for an example. The jews that fund and organize these things know that children learn through observation and repeating what they see. Modern western society is morphing into public, no shame, child grooming. It's pure evil. And I didn't even get to the fact that most leftist politicians are gay, trannies or sympathetic to gays and tranies. Obama is gay and 'Michelle' is a tranny. In fact most of Hollywood is gay, tranny and/or pro LGBTQ and they are almost all universally leftists.

*NSFW

edit 1. LGBT activist admitting child indoctrination is a goal

[–]Nasser 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Not disregarding the rest of your post, it's really informative however Ginsburg didn't advocate lowering the age of consent to 12 and the shit about Michelle being transgender is stupid and ignorant.

https://apnews.com/article/archive-fact-checking-9411725883

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-ruth-bader-quote-idUSKCN25325H

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

shit about Michelle being transgender is stupid and ignorant.

I didn't say is was a hard fact. Obviously there's no hard evidence that Michelle Obama is a tranny besides bulge pictures and vid/pics of him coming out of a gym with a mustache. There's also a pic floating around of Obama in college with a man that looks like Michelle. However, there's the well established fact that elites use lifetime actors for certain political and celebrity roles. There's the fact that globalists universally promote androgyny and transgenderism. (the Jews worship a god that combines male and female traits and it's damn near a fact at this point that Jews are controlling western societies). There's the fact that many politicians and celebrities in the past have been questionable as to their gender (George H Bush's 'wife', Bill gates wife, Celebs raising their kids trans, etc). You can watch Mr. E videos, formerly on YouTube, where he analyzes the hips, shoulders, Adams apples and early lives of sus actors and politicians. I was totally skeptical until I spent time with those videos. Now I'm convinced that a large portion of these figures are trans. Don't you think it's strange that even republicans now are not allowed to oppose LGBT and trans 'rights'? That's because the uni party (the name I give for the people that finance and control both parties) controls the politicians and being anti trans would be to oppose many of the oligarch families. There's also good evidence that Barack Obama is a lifetime actor as well, a homosexual, and his daughters are not his (daughters look very much like two long time childless friends of the Obamas). With Barack being lifetime actor there's no surprise that his 'spouse' would also be one. You might call it 'stupid and arrogant' but for me and research I've done on the power structure it's not only likely but probable. We basically have a weird satanist tranny worshiping cult running western society and there IS hard evidence for that. If we have a tranny cult running banking and media why would it surprise you when they put up a gay glowie and his tranny partner for President? Don't you think it was weird how much support Obama received when he ran? Hell I fell for it and voted for him in 2008.

Ginsburg didn't advocate lowering the age of consent to 12

She's Jewish. Are you not JQ woke? Jews support lowering the age of consent because they have a cultural history of raping children both inside and outside their clan all though there are different rules for Jews and non Jews. Have you not read the Talmud? I don't really care about what exactly she said in '77 or at the '93 hearing. If she's Jewish she's going to work either implicitly or explicitly for lowering of consent. Why do you think almost universally everyone behind LGBTQ and norming child sexuality is Jewish? Check out the Jew Paglia

https://odysee.com/@CarterHeavyIndustries:6/Camille-Paglia-Legalize-Pedophilia:6

I remember seeing a video of RBG on stage talking about the age of consent thing as well but that video is totally gone now. Can't find it on youtube, bitchute or odysee. I'll start looking for it and make a post if I find it.

edit. 1

I found the original text referenced in the 1993 hearing. First I read the hearing. Here's that:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf

Then I found a pdf of the original 1977 RBG publication and found the referenced page (102)

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf

Screen shot in case the pdf is taken down. https://ibb.co/8gGLnqB

On the page you can clearly see her list of recommendations. She clearly advocated for removing the 'carnal knowledge' clause, which mentions the age of 16, and then right below that you can clearly see her suggest/advocate for new language and the new language moves the age of offense down to 'below 12'. Seems pretty clear to me. If she back tracked and said she changed her mind on this I don't really believe her because it's consistent with other Jews in elite circles. If your read the rest of that publication you can see lots of cultural programming changes to the legal code. These aren't about making society safer they are about changing society to a world Jews are comfy living in. RBG would be overjoyed to see all the degenerate pride festivals and all the gender neutral language being inserted into laws and corporate structures.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[removed]

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Can you explain exactly why lowering the age of consent for HETEROSEXUAL relations to 12 is a BAD thing?

    Imagine a 25 year old nigger legally fucking and impregnating your 12 year old daughter.

    it is illegal to screw the crap out of tight, fertile 15 year old White girls

    No one should be considering 15 year old girls fertile. 15 year olds should not be getting pregnant. This is an important developmental age that would be tragically disrupted by a pregnancy and the burden of raising a child, while still being a child.

    [–]IphjdashnathawDeath to Zionism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Imagine a 25 year old nigger legally fucking and impregnating your 12 year old daughter.

    The problem with that is it involves a nigger. Niggers should not be impregnating White women of any age.

    No one should be considering 15 year old girls fertile. 15 year olds should not be getting pregnant.

    Except that is the most fertile age, and in traditional societies before globohomo pregnancy at that age was completely normal.

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Can you explain exactly why lowering the age of consent for HETEROSEXUAL relations to 12 is a BAD thing?

    Legal equality would eventually require it to apply to Homofags also.

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Do u have any more info on lifetime actors? I find this concept intriguing and I wouldn't be surprised if this was a real thing.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I learned about lifetime actors through Alex Jones and Mark Dice. I'm not the biggest Jones fan but two things he was 100% right on were lifetime actors and endocrine disrupting chemicals. Mark Dice has a few books out. I haven't read them but I'm sure he must have a chapter or two on lifetime actors because he references them on his youtube channel. Another guy that helped me wrap my head around both lifetime and crisis actors is Alan Watt. I use to listen to his radio broadcast pretty regularly.

    https://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/index.html

    https://archive.org/details/The_Alan_Watt_Collection

    If I can find a specific article or broadcast that I feel does a good job I'll send it over to you. I also like the youtuber ReallyGraceful.

    https://www.youtube.com/@reallygraceful

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Thanks. I'll take a look at Alan Watt and Mark Dice. reallygraceful is a bit looney at times. I stopped watching her channel when one of her videos had sovereign citizen mumbo jumbo.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't think anyone in the dissident political space has it all right but collectively there's something there. The guy I probably agree the most with at this juncture is Devon Stack aka Blackpilled. He's the only dissident podcast I'm listening to consistently right now.

    https://odysee.com/@Blackpilled:b

    [–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363484489_Levels_of_Well-Being_Among_Men_Who_Are_Incel_Involuntarily_Celibate

    Incels are disproportionately non White and left wing.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Honestly, I'm not convinced there's a conspiracy by the left to push pedophilia.

    It would be very easy to point to age of consent laws and see it being lowered/abolished but that's not the case anywhere.

    Even in hyper conservative places like Japan, their government has also been trying to raise the limit as well.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/21/japan-poised-to-raise-age-of-consent-from-13-in-overhaul-of-sexual-offence-laws

    There are many things to criticize the left for, but this one is just low hanging fruit.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    This is some of the dumbest 'reasoning' I've ever seen. By this logic we should assume that there really is a war on drugs and we have a strict anti-drug society despite the fact that all media constantly shoves drug use down people's throats and intelligence agencies work with banks to run the drug trade.

    Pushing 'children can consent' through allowing children to become 'trans' is an example of them normalising child sexuality. Along with child drag queens and lapdancers, drag queen story hour etc.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Agreed

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      This is some of the dumbest 'reasoning' I've ever seen. By this logic we should assume that there really is a war on drugs and we have a strict anti-drug society despite the fact that all media constantly shoves drug use down people's throats and intelligence agencies work with banks to run the drug trade.

      But who is anti-drug in this scenario? The Left? They have platforms that clearly call for the legalization of marijuana or supporting safe injection sites.

      Edit: This topic is even more greyer, because the drug war has U.S centric views. In places like Europe, drugs are already legalized. In Asia, drugs are punished severely from both left and right.

      Pushing 'children can consent' through allowing children to become 'trans' is an example of them normalising child sexuality. Along with child drag queens and lapdancers, drag queen story hour etc.

      At worst they're being exploited or turned into freaks, but I'm not seeing the connection that it means Adults are allowed to have sexual advances over them. It's like a parent letting their teenage girl walk around in extremely skimpy clothing. It's provocative but doesn't actually confirm the parents are having sex with her (or ok with anyone else doing it).

      [–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I honestly don't really know. All I know is that they assert drag queens do it way less than priests. Any stats on that?