Keith Woods: "Are people still going to call Tucker a gatekeeper and a net negative now that he's calling out the great replacement on Fox?" by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tucker isn't what you think he is. ​He knows what the game is and knows his role - being a pressure release valve for white Americans but leading them away from the real shot so they make no progress. He is a self-professed zionist and controlled op like the rest of the neocon camp

https://odysee.com/@Blackpilled:b/2021-08-08-00-38-30-b-(2):6

ZOG by Tarrock in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You mean Israel is the only middle eastern country who's billionaires fund the majority of our politicians. Israel literally does nothing for the US, so it's not an ally. The US is simply Israel's bitch

Nicki Minaj is waking up from woke by jet199 in Entertainment

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no :( what will I do now?

I changed my mind. Now I love vulgar and degenerate music getting promoted everywhere in society and respect the people in the industry. I'm a conservative, after all.

Vaush attempts fitness by x0x7 in videos

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. Pretty sure this has to be a joke

Nicki Minaj is waking up from woke by jet199 in Entertainment

[–]cisheteroscum 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Conservatives are so desperate for MSM representation that they will signal for even the most disgusting and retarded degenerates like Nikki Minaj if ever they say anything that could be construed as a remotely conservative talking point. It's sad really.

She is also not "waking up" from "woke," let's be real here

Twenty years on from 9/11, the ‘War on Terror’ has morphed into a ‘war’ against the West’s own populations by auch999 in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Predictable. The "neocons" that pushed for the WOT and the Patriot Act only care about money and Israel and have nothing but disdain for whites

Was the car a positive or negative development for society? by Ponderer in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Depends on your perspective. Read Ted

127 A technological advance that appears not to threaten freedom often turns out to threaten it very seriously later on. For example, consider motorized transport. A walking man formerly could go where he pleased, go at his own pace without observing any traffic regulations, and was independent of technological support-systems. When motor vehicles were introduced they appeared to increase man’s freedom. They took no freedom away from the walking man, no one had to have an automobile if he didn’t want one, and anyone who did choose to buy an automobile could travel much faster and farther than a walking man. But the introduction of motorized transport soon changed society in such a way as to restrict greatly man’s freedom of locomotion. When automobiles became numerous, it became necessary to regulate their use extensively. In a car, especially in densely populated areas, one cannot just go where one likes at one’s own pace one’s movement is governed by the flow of traffic and by various traffic laws. One is tied down by various obligations: license requirements, driver test, renewing registration, insurance, maintenance required for safety, monthly payments on purchase price. Moreover, the use of motorized transport is no longer optional. Since the introduction of motorized transport the arrangement of our cities has changed in such a way that the majority of people no longer live within walking distance of their place of employment, shopping areas and recreational opportunities, so that they HAVE TO depend on the automobile for transportation. Or else they must use public transportation, in which case they have even less control over their own movement than when driving a car. Even the walker’s freedom is now greatly restricted. In the city he continually has to stop to wait for traffic lights that are designed mainly to serve auto traffic. In the country, motor traffic makes it dangerous and unpleasant to walk along the highway. (Note this important point that we have just illustrated with the case of motorized transport: When a new item of technology is introduced as an option that an individual can accept or not as he chooses, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional. In many cases the new technology changes society in such a way that people eventually find themselves FORCED to use it.)

Should we Play Video Games? by Frenologist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No.

Saidit.net Canary #20 by magnora7 in SaiditCanary

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Thank God I was starting to legitimately worry lol

Welcome back

What is your religion? by Ponderer in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Agnostic. Will LARP for whatever religion is best for whites tho

Looking for sources on Jewish control over Canada. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bronfman Family, to start

Devon Stack - The Simpsons on God by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know he's been working on this forever. Can't wait to tune in

Edit: this is old - I thought this was going to be his complete video on the Simpsons, which he has been working on

Ouch. Xinhua News scores one. by Chipit in memes

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

None of this was justified. I'm just expressing my surprise

Are there any vax mandates at your workplace or stores you visit? If so, how do you respond to them? by Ponderer in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Almost all of my close friends and family know I am unvaccinated and that I think all of this is bullshit. There's just a certain point where being outwardly hostile or outspoken to the restrictions or local business practices is socially abrasive and inconvenient, and conveys no real benefits to me or anyone else (and won't change anything). Luckily my area isn't very restrictive about it so it's not really a big deal 90% of the time

I will never get the vaxx but my company will require proof of one eventually

Are there any vax mandates at your workplace or stores you visit? If so, how do you respond to them? by Ponderer in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I quietly follow whatever rules are in place (on masks etc.) and lie and say im vaccinated whenever I actually need to (but not to friends or family that I care about)

Ouch. Xinhua News scores one. by Chipit in memes

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Idk I didn't make the infographic or compile the stats. Way more Afghani militants and civilians died than that, that's for sure

Ouch. Xinhua News scores one. by Chipit in memes

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As retarded as this debacle was, I'm surprised we only lost 2300 people. Many others were wounded, sure, but I just would have expected casualties to be much higher

Welsh language use ‘systemically racist’, Arts Council warned by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Welsh language use ‘systemically racist’, Arts Council warned by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Haha

Welsh is actually a really pretty language to listen to. Unfortunately all the other Gaelic languages sound terrible and almost Hebrew tbqh

Poll Finds That 32% of Right-Leaning Adults Agree That "Liberalism Has Equipped Jews to Destroy Institutions" by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They don't - but the hard-line Zionists do, b/c he did everything to help Israel

Jews are generally left-wing (and 71% voted for Clinton in 2016). So despite the fact that he is disliked by most Jews because he touts psuedo-white-nationalist rhetoric he still did everything to help Israel. Which makes sense, given his relationship with Bibi, Kushner, and his largest donor Sheldon Adelson, among other Jewish connections (Wexner, Epstein, etc.)

Safest banks in the US for right wingers? by user2321 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Go with a local bank if you can. It's getting increasingly harder to do that, though. Not always feasible or desirable - but if your checking account isn't with some judeo-globohomo international monstrosity then you are at the lowest risk for getting it frozen

Sacklers Threaten to Pull Out of Opioid Settlement Without Broad Legal Immunity by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

100%. The epitome of evil.

Senate panel warned China has enough data for dossiers on all Americans by nso-pegasus-you in conspiracy

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The US intelligence agencies, corporations, and social media giants already have this - and they are far more dangerous to normal Americans than China is

Taliban begins to cuck, promises Women's rights. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"RadicalCentrist"

Zionist war hawks having a meltdown as GloboHomo is humiliated in Afghanistan by lokke767 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I love how embarrassing this is to neocons/ZOG and to the ruling class generally - but it's a shame so much suffering had to happen (both on Afghanis and US troops). In hindsight this was completely predictable

However, the humanitarian crisis will just be used by the media to accelerate white guilt and promote "refugee" acceptance. So be sure to hit back at shills and propagandists to remind them who is responsible for this atrocity in the first place and never let them forget

The problem with capitalism is that there’s so much prosperity and free time people start creating their own problems. —Kevin Sorbo by Jesus in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People might be more willing to engage with you if you didn't act like such a schizo so often

Was/is the United States a "Christian nation founded on Christian values"? by la_cues in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't think that the Constitution was drafted in order to be even higher above their own moral standards?

What do you mean? Objectively, the people who founded the Constitution did not believe in "racial equality," whatever that is supposed to be. Their own statements - such as Pinckney's - prove this

It actually isn't an ideal, all equal and free, amazing thing to strive for?

Yeah that sounds great and all - but the reality is, right now, you have to pay for black welfare qweenz and wars for Israel. You don't live in a lolbert wonderland. So, WTF are you gonna do now?

Are white people bad for the environment? by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This has always been an anti-white narrative. Only people smart enough to care about the environment are the ones who pay attention to articles like these. The birth rate in Niger is like 7. Whites aren't even at replacement (2)

I have friends who have touted the "bad for the environment" argument as to why they don't want kids. I'm always at the point of bringing up African birth rates and IQ, and saying "Given all this, what are the weighted odds of your child having a marginally bad impact on the environment, vs they themselves solving the environment problem?"

I know better. Instead, I just say "our population is increasing either way, at least don't make this a reason" or "maybe your kids would solve the environment problem"

God I hate this Jewish/leftist hell

Lost generation: white children born during the COVID hysteria found to have massively lowered intelligence in new study by Bagarmoossen in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We know that this isn't consequentially true. IQ is 80% heritable, the kids will be fine (in this aspect, anyways)

Was/is the United States a "Christian nation founded on Christian values"? by la_cues in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Absolutely ridiculous to say it's not conceivable that these people could be considered or treated as people

Maybe. Yet, they weren't for centuries up until 150 years ago or so, at best. Long after the signing.

as someone who feels very much in line with Quaker values

I meant to say "puritans" not "quakers" - but I don't think it makes much of a difference, and I don't know much about the particulars of different sects of christians who left Europe at the time. But, the fact remains - "America" was founded mostly by what we could call religious extremists (at the time), who were often discriminated against in their home countries, and left for "religious freedom" (win-win for the crown, too - get rid religious dissidents, maybe get a profitable colony) but this idea of "religious freedom" should not be trivialized. It's not just about what you "believe." They were extremely strict about their observances, and it dictated every aspect of their life. For instance - you may think you have values in common with them, but I doubt you dress in black with buckles every day

From what I recall, Quakers were early to publicly decry slavery and restrictions on women

"Maybe" I don't know. But in any case, the main point is this:

If you are a "constitutionalist" or "libertarian" who endorses modern globohomo multiracialism or immigration, but claim to to represent the founders intent based on the Constitution, then you are lying to yourself and others. For example, leftists say we need to restrict firearms, because "the founders never anticipated automatic weapons" or something like that. This is obviously true - but not a good reason to ban guns. Constitutionalists will decry leftists attempts at this (rightfully, based on the 2nd) - but yet, at the same time, defend multiracialism/multiculturism because it isn't literally written down in the Constitution as being forbidden, despite the fact "the founders" very clearly would have never endorsed this. Just because they didn't anticipate the ideas of "multiculturalism" or "multiracialism" or even "black citizenship" (because they were incredulous) doesn't mean they wouldn't have, had they ever known these could be things (and the historical record decisively proves this).

A nation founded by white, protestant christians that owned slaves, that clearly never endorsed black citizenship, in 1780, clearly did not intend for their nation to become a multiracial/multicultural/multireligious hellhole. Constitutionalists might be able to honestly represent the Constitution itself - but they cannot honestly represent the "founders intent." They are hiding behind a sacred piece of paper, pretending that this document alone is actually what they intended - despite all contemporary evidence to the contrary. On the other hand, we much more closely represent the intent of "the founders" - not Constitutionalists - and they will have to live with that hypocrisy (and the consequences) forever. Unfortunately, so will we

Was/is the United States a "Christian nation founded on Christian values"? by la_cues in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

North America was settled and founded by christian religious extremists (quakers, etc) who valued "religious freedom" compared to Anglican and other predominant christian denominations in Europe. Which, at that time, mostly had state-sanctioned religious sects and morals. And this "religious freedom" is reflected in the Constitution for that reason, in the context of the time

However, they didn't enshrine other important things like "whites only" or "christians only" - but probably because they simply could never conceive of the idea that such "tolerances" could ever be allowed. Even Charles Pinckney, the last surviving member of of the signing of the Constitution at the time, said on black citizenship

I was the only member of that body that ever submitted the plan of a constitution completely drawn in articles and sections; and this having been done at a very early state of their proceedings, the article on which now so much stress is laid, and on the meaning of which the whole of this question is made to turn, and which is in these words: "the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities in every State," having been made by me, it is supposed I must know, or perfectly recollect, what I meant by it. In answer, I say, that, at the time I drew that constitution, I perfectly knew that there did not then exist such a thing in the Union as a black or colored citizen, nor could I then have conceived it possible such a thing could have ever existed in it; nor, notwithstanding all that has been said on the subject, do I now believe one does exist in it.

Given the comparatively "extreme" nature of this statement in modern times, we can reasonably infer that the founders very clearly envisioned the US to be an exclusively white, christian nation. As to why they did not say this explicitly in the constitution, no one can say for sure - but we know they would find this extremely regrettable now

Also - "Conceived in White Nationalism" - AltHype

I also don't personally identify as christian, FTR

“LOCK HER UP” – ANGRY PROTESTERS DEMAND HILLARY CLINTON BE LOCKED UP FOR GOOD | Base Days by skeeter in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. Sorry

FINALLY! HILLARY CLINTON TO BE TRIED & IMPRISONED! Rand Paul RIPS Hillary Clinton to SHREDS by skeeter in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. Sorry

The most vaccine-hesitant group of all? PhDs by [deleted] in Coronavirus

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Having kids isn't a political solution and is no viable strategy to victory by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

White shitlibs are made not born

This is at best halfways true. Conservatism is .45-.65 heritable., and so are other traits that we care about. On top of that, conservative parents are more likely to raise conservative kids, regardless of genetic influence.

genetic determinist angle that assumes the bootlickers are just going to kill themselves off and leave only us is naive imo

It is - but that's kind of my point. Obviously, it is not enough to just "have kids" - at some point we will have to seize control of consequential public and private institutions from leftists/Jews, one way or another. What I'm saying is, contrary to Caspar's main point of the post, is that the "have kids" proponents by and large do not think this is a sufficient strategy to solve all of our problems. But it is necessary if we are to win - and there are plenty of anti-natal and anti-family influences out there that are detrimental to us

Sean Last is having a debate in 3 hours from now by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This. Literally just an NPC brown girl some people listen to for some reason

Sean Last is having a debate in 3 hours from now by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah this wasn't even a debate. More like an educational session. The patience Sean has is commendable but this wasn't even worth watching

Having kids isn't a political solution and is no viable strategy to victory by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think people who argue for having lots of kids intend it to be some kind of panacea for all of our sociopolitical problems. It's just a necessary condition for victory in the long-term. The fact is modern society is very dysgenic and anti-natal, but conservatives are outbreeding white shitlibs, and eventually this will mean that white shitlibs don't exist anymore and this faction will disappear. As this happens, our political struggle will become a more and more obviously racial one, which will unify white people against the judeo/non-white alliance. White birth rates are very low and below replacement in most countries, so this "have kids" sentiment is good and necessary even if won't solve literally everything

Secession is inevitable - Part 2 by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The economic arguments against the Ethnostate always seem to imply we could never assign a monetary value to independence. How much of my real income to I have to give up to get the Ethnostate? 25%? 50%? Either way that's reasonable (for me) if it comes to that

We move 70% of goods by truck in the US that would no longer be flowing in and out of that former state most likely.

I don't think an economic embargo is that likely. Almost all corporations today are multinational (and multistate). Ideally, when the US breaks up, it will simultaneously break up into several successor states (say, 10) who will have a mutual interest in not engaging in trade wars, etc. In any case we can assume that there will some economic and political drawbacks (at first anyways) - but, these are acceptable (within reason) assuming the main goal is achieved

Assuming the Federal Govt would allow succession to happen in the first place.

The Federal government is made up of the states though. And if West Coast liberals and southern republican all want to secede, why are they going to fight eachother? The military (for now) is also largely made up of conservative whites. Who will probably not fight white breakaway state, and many would defect.

This is all worth its own post tho

Secession is inevitable - Part 2 by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Plan I showed was hopeful to cut a path through Oregon - but you don't "need" ports (e.g. Switzerland). If Cascadia wants to charge us tariffs then whatever, we can negotiate - but the main point of that vid is that secession is practically possible, not that this.particular plan was desirable in absolutely every way

Shocking poll finds many Americans now want to secede from the United States by Drewski in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Good

The only major city in the world where housing prices are not soaring is Tokyo by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They also built like crazy a few decades ago (remember the bridge to nowhere?)

I think that was China/NK

Some positive trends by DisastrousDepth14 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Redbridge Labour commissioned a furry rainbow monkey with a huge dildo and exposed anus to dance in front of children as part of a reading project at libraries this summer by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

National Justice article makes my blood boil. Every fucking time

Just activated flairs if anyone gives a shit😎👍 by Markimus in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Search for "show my flair"

Just activated flairs if anyone gives a shit😎👍 by Markimus in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Does mine work for anyone or no

Anarcho-feminists storm Austrian newspaper over ‘racist’ reporting in high-profile teen gang-rape & murder case by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

anarcho-feminists

I feel like feminism wouldn't do so well in an actually anarchist society

Most Americans Believe Someone Other than Biden Is Running the Show by scrubking in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Prime Minister Klain most likely holding the leash. Jewish Chief of staff and has been in positions under Clinton and Obama

DebateAltRight banned me, and this was my response by socks in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Dog breeds are notoriously inbred. Humans are not. Crossbreeding dog breeds can mitigate duplicates of many of the harmful recessive alleles present in either breed. This is not the case for major human races. So it's not a relevant analogy

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why would you choose a handle using the name and alma mater of some random (real) indian person if it isn't you? Why would you choose your own name and info if it was you? I don't know which is weirder

Regardless, your posts on GLR's grandchildren, "self-control" of Cameroonian vs. German children (second time you've posted this), hyperbolistic titles like:

"Study finds that "Whites are more likely to assault and use weapons against Blacks and Hispanics than Blacks and Hispanics are to assault or use weapons against Whites?!?!"

etc. - these are posts made in bad faith with cherry-picked, weak sources. I don't care who you were or who are pretending to be, but you don't look like a legit poster either way

What do you think was Pence's game on the 6th? by Republican58 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

His plan was to do absolutely nothing, and that was what he did. Same with Trump

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what about the nature article? Isn't it the most up to date research

I don't know, and I don't have time to look. Offspring have been getting taller each generation for awhile now, there are probably a lot of conflating factors. The differences probably aren't very big or practical anyways

what about ruqqus are you referring to?

You and I both know that you are a disingenuous concern troll, and you probably aren't fooling anyone else

btw this is me

Is this also you?

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So your response is to post insults

If you come in here firing ad hominem shots across the bow about "genocide" don't be surprised if you get hit back

and links to obviously racist assholes?

Someone says or researches something the system doesn't like -> they are branded a "racist" -> they are now wrong because they are "racist"

Does it ever occur to you how convenient that is? Just call them a "heretic" or a "witch" and burn them at the stake at this point

And anyone who thinks 'anyways' is a word

It is

Moreover, IQ is only one measurement of intelligence

IQ tests can measure a variety of things including verbal, visual-spatial, and other kinds of intelligence. "g", or the general intelligence factor, is really what we care about because it has most all of the predictive power of IQ tests (for things like income, educational attainment, etc.) Most IQ tests report the aggregate IQ score of these different batteries of tests, and for most practical purposes IQ ≈ g

of which there are other measures.

Not really. At least, not tests that are useful in predicting anything we care about. There is just one g (and still just one g)

And regarding the scientific literature on miscegenation and consanguinity, one merely has to search for it, or check PubMed.

You should present the evidence for the claims you make, as we do. Miscegenation usually just results in an average of traits for both races. (1000.5) + (850.5) = 92.5 IQ for black/white offspring. Same goes for other traits. If you have something else then find it and actually present it in context

Watson, that colonialist asshole is known by scientists to be wrong about his claims about race; which is why the fucker had to apologize:

No - he had to apologize because people didn't like what he said, not because he was "wrong."

It's mystifying how people like you will turn a blind eye to this. Every society has its taboos. Globohomo-judeo neoliberalism requires that race not exist (if your white and on the defensive, at least) and white people be exploited. If you have evidence to the contrary and speak out about it you get ostracized, demonized, and attacked. It's like criticizing communism in the Soviet Union.

Moreover, Watson refers to Africans, not necessarily mixed race people

It is obviously implied that since Watson believes Africans have a lower level of intelligence due to genes, then he would also believe that mix-raced black/white people would have lower IQs than full-white people

who do tend to be smarter, more attractive, more physically capable, and more interesting, taller, and with bigger dicks

Lol - "MUH DICK!!!" [citation needed] for every one of these outlandish claims.

Intelligence is not the only value of a human being

No one said it was. It's just a trait that matters a lot for socioeconomic outcomes

and if it were, mixed race people are not dumber than others, by any standard of research.

Wrong. How many times do we have to do this?. Of course, it depends on the races involved and what parent race you are comparing to

Those who argue against this tend to favor abuses of all kinds against non-white people

Ignoring your appeal to a motive, it is true that any differences in racial socioeconomic outcomes are already used as by leftists and other anti-whites as an excuse to exploit whites. "White supremacy" is to blame for why blacks do bad in schools, commit more crimes, and have less money - and no evidence ever has to be presented for this magical force. So now we need affirmative action, welfare, anti-white propaganda everywhere, etc.

So whatever you fallaciously accuse us of presenting this evidence for, the current system is already using no evidence at all to justify exploiting us right now in the present

It's stupid, backward, and hateful.

Emotional reasoning. The system obviously hates white people, so why don't you go to the media and tell them to stop all their hateful bigotry? Maybe we'd be more interested in not talking about race and IQ if we weren't already demonized by every institution in this society

Look also at the centuries of poorer economic conditions

Why are places like Africa almost universally shitty, but nations like China or South Korea (who were just as poor or poorer at the start of the 20th century) doing so well? What about Haiti? Why are the correlations between racial economic outcomes and racial IQs so consistent across countries and time? Maybe you have causality reversed?

of the people who are being criticized as having lower IQ.

Your choice of the word "criticized" belies your foundation of emotional reasoning. It is just a statement of fact that certain groups are more or less intelligent than others, and this has important implications in a multiracial society (esp. one where we share public resources and institutions).

There are so many factors to consider, other than DNA.

These have been considered. For decades. That's why heritability (genetic portion) is estimated at 80% in western countries (yes, for all races)

you won't see a significant gap in intelligence in mixed-race children:

Racial gaps are smaller in childhood and heritability is lower. This is the Wilson effect, which has been known for 50 years

It's extremely low-effort to conduct a google search and rage post a bunch of shitty left-leaning links that you've never read and give no context to. Foxy already took a shot at some of these and some are duplicates so I'll only respond to a few (or you can actually put these in context)

Eyferth_study

Ahh a classic study and one of my favorite egalitarian copes. Lots of problems with it

First, the US Army (and almost certainly the french army, don't know for sure) employed IQ tests in WWI. 90 was the minimum for the US, so already with blacks at mean 85 we are getting an "elite" sample of blacks as fathers. So, offspring IQ will be higher than what we would typically assume. Second, the mean age of the children in this study is 10, and we already discussed the Wilson effect, so this is inappropriate to extrapolate onto the adult population. Third, the most strikingly anomalous thing about this study is the inexplicably low IQ of the white girls in the study (93?) which of course, is the singular category where mixed-race children did better. Also, the mixed race children all score below 100, so the eyferth results don't even deviate significantly from the hereditarian hypothesis.

Actually, I think I'm done here. Google searches? Qoura? DailyMail? Come on.

You strike me as a "true believer" - someone who literally takes anything the system has presented to them - whether its a "fact" or a moral foundation - as "true", and everything else is like heresy, or a sin. Therefore, it must be wrong.

It's obvious you don't know a lot about intelligence testing, and we have seen copes on this topic hundreds of times. Here's a post I made that you can check out to start

If you really want to discuss these links, then actually read them and present them in a post in context (notice how I do that with all of my links)

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The old and unscientific claim that miscegenation is in any way problematic has been claimed many times and debunked in every instance

Once again you just lie out your ass and provide no evidence for the things you say

There are no biologists or geneticists on Saidit who will have any scientific arguments against miscegenation

Another lie. James Watson, who literally discovered DNA, disagrees:

James D. Watson, 79, co-discoverer of the DNA helix and winner of the 1962 Nobel Prize in medicine, told the Sunday Times of London that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours — whereas all the testing says not really."

It's a stupid appeal to credentialism anyways. You don't need to be a biologist or a geneticist to understand the basics of inheritance. Humans have been selectively breeding animals (and, themselves) for thousands of years without ever knowing what a "gene" was

because these arguments are invalid

How are they "invalid?" IQ and other psychological traits are all highly heritable and are not the same between racial groups. The end

Given the treatment of Watson and other experts who have pointed these things out, is it really any wonder why hordes of geneticists and biologists don't come out to tell society that their sacred taboos and beliefs about race aren't true?

arguments against miscegenation are used by those who want to aparthied and/or genocide of all non-white people

Pathetic ad-hominem and appeal to a motive. White people being marginalized and demonized by every institution as our homelands are invaded by others, and our incomes repossessed to pay for their gibs. Yet, you have the gall to make the claim that we are the ones who want genocide.

You are wrong about race, wrong about inheritance, and wrong about what we want. Ultimately, you are an extremely uninformed and shameless apologist for a very stupid (and evil) utopian project built on the backs of white people, which is doomed to fail eventually - no matter how much you parrot unsubstantiated NPC talking points on this website

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Pop science is globohomo propaganda and your first article at least is written by a typical blue check liberal woman (who might be Jewish, can't tell)

AltHype on "Race Mixing". Many studies there. ​No beneficial effects and the IQs of mixed-race children fall in-between the races of their parents (on average). Mixed race marriages also seem to suffer more problems

On height I've never seen anything that I can remember but it's probably BS. Whites in the US are very slightly taller than blacks on average, and also have higher IQs, despite being less "diverse" genetically (and have a much greater variation in phenotypes - blonde hair, blues eyes, etc.) Benefits of "genetic diversity" are just BS - unless you're talking about seriously small gene pools, which doesn't apply to 500M Europeans

if a Swede and a Somalian breed, the kid will be smarter!?!

No ((Lynn, 2006) and you knew that

Beyond the problems with IQ and the heritability of political views and criminal behavior, another problem with race-mixing is that it destroys our social cohesion and ability to action ourselves politically. Whites are 60% of the US population, yet we are demonized relentlessly by the MSM and branded as the #1 terror threat by our own government. What's going to happen when we are 50%? 40%

I am against race mixing but,

I remember you from Ruqqus. Reminder that a misrepresentation of your views is a violation of rule 3.

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The dysgenics implication has been known for awhile.. Richard Lynn has a whole book on it and Last recently published something on that too

Basically all evidence shows the entire "liberal" multiracial utopian project is going to end in disaster

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Their example would only make sense..

To try and make sense of leftism is to fundamentally misunderstand it. It's like religion or psychological coping mechanism, it doesn't require consistency

Read Ted, at least 6-32. Don't want to fill up the comments section with a wall of text

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The leftish presupposition is that all people are equally able to be intelligent if trained/educated properly. Or at least, all races are equally capable. Therefore we must equalize or attempt to equalize educational attainment between groups

Leftists dislike IQ tests because they suggest that people can be classified as superior/inferior to others. This causes them emotional anguish due to their oversocialization and low self-esteem. They dismiss IQ tests as illegitimate because they are morally repugnant, not because they have a good rational reason for doing it (but theyll try to make up reasons to pretend their rationale isn't just emotive)

18 ...More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

Claim: Crime plummeted as America browned by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand that since the 1970s or so, crime and violent crime has decreased sharply

I'm not sure if that's true, but in any case it was probably higher during the crack epidemic of the 1980s. Regardless

If blacks and Hispanics commit crime at higher rates per capita

This is just a fact [1], [2], [3]

Woke leftist culture imported from US is ‘racialising’ France, causing splits in society and holding back ethnic minorities, says President Macron by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

gullible, low-IQ, brown socialists who blame imaginary problems on their betters

Yeah no.. not really. It's the the gullible white people falling in line for this shit that is the real problem. And the tribe of people controlling the media making them that way

What are your thoughts on Rush Limbaugh's 2009 cpac speech? by Republican58 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're really committed to this parody account aren't you

CNN, MSNBC's ratings collapse due to 'serious credibility problem' covering Biden, experts say by [deleted] in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just turn off the jewtube

US mainstream media exists for the sole purpose of making white people insane

Nietzsche on a pure European race and culture by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is this even a practical problem?

Tucker Carlson Confirms NSA is Spying on Him by Tarrock in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Doesn't the NSA spy on everyone?

MSNBC OUTRAGED By 'Defund The Military' by EndlessSunflowers in conspiracy

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

mainstream media is controlled by the Military Industrial Complex

Hmmm not quite

What are your thoughts on this article describing Trump's rally and his commitment to retaking America? by Republican58 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Trump is our era's Julius Caeser or JFK

LOL. Trump is a fat buttgoy charlatan who was never sincere about what he said, but is somehow able to continue his grift despite his incompetence and betrayal because there are somehow still conservatards out there dumb enough to support him. Trump serves Jews, not you, never did.

Get a grip. The shilling doesn't work here

Jewish woman writes doctoral thesis on why US justice system is racist against blacks, and then is stabbed to death by blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

but the nature/nurture argument normally results in overwhelming evidence that nurture (behaviour) is the primary influence on one's activities

No. Intelligence is 0.8 heritable in western countries and virtually all psychological traits are highly heritable. This is the "iron law" of heritability

We keep hearing about subversive left wing think-tanks. Do we have think-tanks of our own to strengthen and propound our ideology? by Oingo in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The main reason there isn't is because associating with far-right ideas and institutions basically brands you as an evil heretic who needs to be ostracized from society. If you are employed by one of these institution, or donate money/time to them, then you effectively end your career. The second reason is that most of our work has already been done - race and IQ has already been exhausted by the Pioneer Fund, Jewish influence effectively cataloged by NPI, Richard Lynn, CoC, and other autodidacts, and races consuming welfare documented by Center for immigration Studies, among others

Basically, there's not a whole lot of work to be done and lots of incentives against doing more

We keep hearing about subversive left wing think-tanks. Do we have think-tanks of our own to strengthen and propound our ideology? by Oingo in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The difficulty as always is funding

And Jewish lawsuits / economic embargos

What do you think of my views? by EdLimonovFan in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You sound like a vargish communist for whites. Fine to me, not religious and not gonna split hairs over trivial economic differences as long as you're pro-white. While we're under ZOG, neither of us get anything, so we're definitely on the same team

Show support for your political party with user flairs by AXXA in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. Fine to me, not sure if they have a color or not

Show support for your political party with user flairs by AXXA in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Can you add "Dissident Right" flair? Or maybe NJP

Slavs aren't white. by MisterQ in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Aryan

one of us

Try again. No one here believes in Nazi anthro-mythology that was discredited, even in it's own time

Go around correcting people IRL that Slavs actually aren't "white" and so shouldn't be subjected to media "white guilt" propaganda or "anti-discrimination" laws b/c they are so different.

Was Watergate no big deal? by la_cues in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

isn't spying in this way a dishonest and crooked act?

I already said that?

The first time it happens

But it wasn't the first time. At least, not the first time presidents have done reprehensible things

Was Watergate no big deal? by la_cues in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly, I don't think it was. At least not compared to anything subsequent presidents have done. Obama illegally spied on Trump's presidential campaign and this isn't even talked about. Nothing has happened or will happen to him for it. Then when you consider all the other heinous things presidents have done, Watergate just doesn't seem like a big deal at all. Illegal/immoral, sure, but just not that bad in the grand scheme of things. But it was apparently so bad at the time that Nixon willingly resigned over it - despite being one of the most popular presidents up until that point

How to avoid /s/debatealtright by fschmidt in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

this shabbat

Lel

How to avoid /s/debatealtright by fschmidt in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

t. Pajeet

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wait wtf hahaha how did they do that ??

What ya doing dog? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No worries dude

How to avoid /s/debatealtright by fschmidt in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Haha

I know you're no fan, fschmidt. Glad you can shut the bad voices out for your own sanity

What ya doing dog? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Given that were on s/All now I'm gonna remove this. Let's keep it to news/debate, there's other places to post this

Top U.S General Defends Critical Race Theory. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah that's true. I bet 60% would defect if shit ever went down.

Two Cheers for Charles Murray, Jared Taylor. A bit of a misleading title, he actually thinks he's cucking out with his latest book. by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

JF talked about Murray the other day. I agree that he is increasingly irrelevant and out-of-touch. He just wrote a book a year or two ago where he said we need to abandon the concept of race entirely or something. Taylor seems on-point here

Top U.S General Defends Critical Race Theory. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"The military is on our side"

The final cope. Top military officials are basically spineless politicians. They will bend the knee to the ZOG or be cast out

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe. In any case, solid ammo against the ruling class. We never got the truth on Epstein either

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Epstein was blatant as hell too. They don't care about subtlety anymore - but apparently, they don't need to

McAfee is also a huge media troll, so I almost want to withold judgement until we know for sure this isn't a stunt