What are your thoughts on this reddit thread regarding African American crime? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's possible that it turns out to be bullshit like most things they say but I haven't seen any refutations yet so I thought I will grant him that one.

What are your thoughts on this reddit thread regarding African American crime? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He might be right about anti-black bias in news coverage BUT he is ignoring the anti-white bias in TV shows. Whites are much more often depicted as murderers on TV than they are in reality.

Content analyses of three seasons of Law & Order were examined to evaluate the show’s portrayal of race and crime compared to actual crime statistics for New York City during the same periods.[...] Results suggest whites are disproportionately portrayed as criminals five to eight times more often on police dramas compared to actual crime statistics for the city of New York, exposure to police dramas increases beliefs of threats to personal safety, and exposure to police dramas leads to elevated perceptions of white criminality among non-whites.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2015.1104977

Now, I would assume TV shows have larger audience than news coverage of crimes so by his own logic whites are erroneously over-represented in these NCVS surveys to even larger extent than blacks.

That being said I think this whole narrative is BS. According to him people don't remember the race of the man who robbed them because of the stress so they just say he was black that's what they saw on the news? Whether the offender was white or black is not some tiny detail you forget because of stress. This excuse doesn't even pass basic smell test. Not mentioning he didn't provide any evidence that this is happening, it's pure speculation on his part.

It's also funny he claims blacks and whites use drugs at similar rates based on a self-report survey (National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) when he criticized surveys for being inaccurate few moments ago. I guess they start being accurate when they show what he likes to see. Unfortunately for him there is good evidence that blacks are lying on these surveys about their drug use. This has been documented here: https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/is-the-criminal-justice-system-racist/

To put it shortly, blacks use drugs at higher rates than whites so it doesn't mean there is systemic racism when they get arrested for drugs at higher rates as well.

Anyway that's my response. If someone here has functioning reddit account you can send him this reply. I would be curious what he has to say.

Is there any data on school bullies broken down by race? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://seanlast.substack.com/p/racial-diversity-strength-or-weakness

Turning to bullying, Farris (2006) finds that black students are more likely to be bullies than are white students while white students are more likely than black students to be the victims of bullying. Latino students are both more likely than black students to be engage in, and be a victim of, bullying. [...] With respect to interracial bullying, Farris finds that black on white bullying is 64% more common than is White on Black bullying.

What are the best counters to the "White Race" does not exist argument? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just ask them to provide evidence of this. If there really was some conspiracy by European elites to create race then there should be some correspondence or some other written record of it.

What are the best counters to the "White Race" does not exist argument? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here is one good article on "X weren't considered white" myth

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/03/22/sorry-but-the-irish-were-always-white-and-so-were-the-italians-jews-and-so-on/

There is a lot more to say about this than I'm willing to write here so I'll just link this paper

https://sci-hub.se/http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/666383

Second, no boundary separated SEEs[Southern & Eastern Europeans] from whites; SEEs were not widely recognized as nonwhite, nor was such a boundary institutionalized. In fact, where white was a meaningful category, SEEs were virtually always included within it. To be sure, a fairly bright boundary separated SEEs from northern and western Europeans (NWEs) for a time. This boundary was based on religion, national origin, citizenship status, and even intra-European racial categories. It was not, however, based on whiteness or non whiteness. ... The crucial point we emphasize, however, is that the SEE story suggests the remarkable stability of the white-nonwhite boundary, not, as is sometimes assumed, its fluidity.

This one looked at census classifications and found no evidence of this myth

https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1096&context=jpps

In this paper, we question the now widely held belief that some non-Anglo-Saxon European immigrant groups such as the Irish, Italians, and Jews became white in historical America. We have found no evidence to support the “becoming white” thesis in terms of change in the official racial classifications of these groups in the record of social institutions such as U.S. censuses, naturalization laws, and court cases. Non-Anglo-Saxon European groups arrived in America as whites, and there was no need for them to be reclassified as whites.

This paper found that 19% of male British immigrants married Irish wife and 15% of British female immigrants married Irish husband. Not exactly a behavior from people who supposedly consider Irish to be non-white or inferior

https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24259757/

As for Ben Franklin, the one quote he made about Germans you never find them citing is this one. Wonder why.

"Yet I am not for refusing entirely to admit them into our Colonies: all that seems to be necessary is, to distribute them more equally, mix them with the English, establish English Schools where they are now too thick settled, and take some care to prevent the practice lately fallen into by some of the Ship Owners, of sweeping the German Goals to make up the number of their Passengers. I say I am not against the Admission of Germans in general, for they have their Virtues, their industry and frugality is exemplary; They are excellent husbandmen and contribute greatly to the improvement of a Country."

"Any religion that has a less ambitious goal than dominating the world is not a true religion. It’s a cope." - Mark Brahmin by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mark Brahmin is a complete retard who cannot stand having his ideas questioned. He blocked me while we were having a debate on Twitter and from what I've heard he blocked others in alt-right sphere for petty reasons.

Why are Russians so violent? by HeWhoGlows in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It should be noted that the most crime-ridden parts of Russia are in the east where most ethnic minorities live

https://imgpile.com/images/TH2b1k.png

Otherwise I think it it byproduct of alcoholism.

The demise of Russia is devastating to the alt-right worldview. by Zoomer1212 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?

Does anyone have info on what role jews played in the holodomor? by Mastermustard03 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know about Holodomor specifically (beside Genrikh Jagoda) but there is a lot of stuff on jews in Soviet Union.

Number of Leading NKVD Staff Members. In some years there was more jews than Russians until Stalin purged them

https://codoh.com/library/document/1722/?lang=en

This Atlantic article, quoting Timothy Snyder, stating that a third of NKVD officers were jews

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/01/grappling-with-holodomor/282816/

Finally, the Russians are taking off their gloves and completely destroying Ukrainian civilian infrastructure by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I live in Slovakia. We've been in NATO and EU for almost 20 years and there is no sign of any incoming mass migration here. We are in some ways less pozzed than Ukraine. When I saw all those foreign students form India and Africa I was shocked. We have nothing like that here.

Finally, the Russians are taking off their gloves and completely destroying Ukrainian civilian infrastructure by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why are you cheering for destruction of a white country? Are you a jew? A sociopath? Or are you so consumed by Amerishart culture war bullshit you think this post will own feminists on Twitter?

Which do you respect more? by HeWhoGlows in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Given how you framed the question you probably want to hear a certain answer but truth is I don't think either of these men done anything that's worthy of respect.

Nigeria bans white models by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How many white models are there even in Nigeria?

American Youtuber makes a video on the Great Replacement. Your thoughts? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sean Last did a quick thread on him a while back.

https://twitter.com/Sean__Last/status/1551442991918862336

He straight up lies about a study that showed immigration is responsible for falling IQs in France.

Opinions on this post blowing up on reddit about a Black couple potentially being racially discriminated by an appraiser by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Someone on twitter pointed out that prices of real estates went up between the time period when they made the house "whitewashed". It's just a dumb click bait article to push more racism narrative.

If this effect existed in the real world you could just buy black owned house and then resell it for 300K higher price. People would make millions out of this if it was possible.

It's almost 50 degrees Celsius in Iraq right now by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Do you think Russia will let everyone live on their Siberian farmland? Think again.

Looking for recommendations for economic books about capitalism and finance from a rightwing socialist perspective by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know what you mean, the right wing position on economics is usually pro-capitalism. The only capitalist critique that I've come across was from a leftist socialist perspective.

Viktor Orbán adviser resigns after Hungarian premier’s ‘mixed race’ speech by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here is what the 2nd source says

According to OIF’s data, the overwhelming majority of this year’s applicants, nearly 30,000 people (60%), are Ukrainian citizens, followed by a little more than 4,000 Serbian citizens, then Vietnamese, Chinese, and Indians.

The number of non-whites is pretty low. Majority of them are Europeans.

Why exactly do people hate U.S Segregation? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't forget the other side of segregation.

https://twitter.com/BosqueAli/status/1500312541918121984

People are almost exclusively shown pics of "whites only" so they forget that segregation worked both ways

If you still have a reddit account get into this thread boys. Lots of fun to be had. by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why? Just your typical reddit circlejerk where they call some MAGA boomer fascist

***REDDIT MELTDOWN WATCH: ROE VS WADE OVERTURNED*** by Tarrock in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Good point. I haven't thought about this. Wonder how this will effect the migration of Californians into Midwest.

Sunday Remoralize Thread #7 by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Leftist would make the pawns black

NYT: China Is Winning in Asia. Biden’s Plans Won’t Change That. by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

China taking over Taiwan won't make black people disappear

Average IQ in Iran by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One problem I'm seeing is that they didn't specify which country they used as 100 IQ baseline. Most IQ maps you see made either by Lynn or others set IQ of Britain to 100 and all other countries had IQ in relation to that number. If you want to make international comparisons you have to do this since IQ is relative scale not absolute one. You could set Somalia to 100 and then Europe would have IQ of 130.

These authors probably didn't do any of this so it's useless.

Has there ever been antisemitic Communists in history? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Marx and his views on jews are quite (in)famous. Stalin didn't want his daughter to marry a jew. You would probably found other examples if you tried.

Mother of all debates: Richard Spencer, Mark Collet and Alt hype by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mark Collet is good at debates? Have you watched his debate with Destiny? Or the one he recently had with two Destiny clones on PP? He's not even familiar with basic white privilege arguments, they all hurl at him the most basic talking points and he just lets it all slide. Mostly he just rambles for minutes about something that's not related to the topic at hand. He is just embarrassing.

Ukrainian schools full of globohomo propaganda by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see photo from one school. What is to say that every school is like this? Or even majority of them?

Azov holds Ukrainian citizens hostage by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How does this clip suggest they are being held hostage?

What statistics show jews comprise a disproportionate share of americas elite? by BoxcarBandit in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sean Last wrote couple posts on this.

https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2020/05/17/jewish-influence-on-american-politics/

https://archive.fo/NVb4w

Then there is this bit from Culture of Critique

Almost one-half of Kadushin’s (1974, 23) sample of elite post-World War II American intellectuals was Jewish. The sample was based on the most frequent contributors to leading intellectual journals, followed by interviews in which the intellectuals “voted” for another intellectual they considered most influential in their thinking. Over 40 percent of the Jews in the sample received six or more votes as being most influential, compared to only 15 percent of non-Jews (p. 32).

This quote especially I found interesting

By 1968 Walter Kerr could write, “what has happened since World War II is that the American sensibility has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is anything else… The literate American mind has come in some measure to think Jewishly. It has been taught to, and it was ready to. After the entertainers and novelists came the Jewish critics, politicians, theologians. Critics and politicians and theologians are by profession molders; they form ways of seeing.”

Russian - Ukraine War updates by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Don't know if this is the right thread but I don's know where else to share it.

I came across this very amusing thread. Basically it's all black people crying about racism that countries that rejected Syrians in 2015 are now opening their borders to Ukrainians. There is one post where there is news article from 2015 about how Poland closed its borders to refugees and then recent one about how it allows all Ukrainians and even their pets. Of course blacks are seething in the replies about the huge injustice inflected upon them. Hilarious stuff.

https://twitter.com/TihomirSabchev/status/1497264454236610563

How many negroes are there in Ukraine? by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Blacks are extremely narcissistic population. WE WUZZING is just one of many manifestations of that. Their behavior starts making a lot of sense when you look at them this way.

Is Jared Taylor Finally Addressing the J.Q.? by Richard_Parker in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He addressed JQ long time ago. In this interview he gave answer as from Culture of Critique.

https://youtu.be/iEnM_fualmg

Reminder that if you don't side unconditionally with Russia over (((Ukraine))) by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hello? Schizo department?

Is there an online library/archive for our guys? by Markimus in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For videos, there is https://altcensored.com/

It has archived a lot of channels that are now gone from YouTube including AltHype or Amren

Is there an online library/archive for our guys? by Markimus in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's just copy-pasting stuff from the Vaush google doc. This has been responded to two years ago.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bT_Q3TXZX0ZjnNS_QMsR-MEPut7S5EIkFeAkIO7vEGI/edit

Genuine question. Who are the most beautiful non-white women? by Poclurker in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dating isn't about attraction? Well that's an interesting take.

Anyway, if that was true, all women wold go for Asian men since they are the richest demographic group. Yet that doesn't happen. In fact, when you look at the table 5.6 in the infograph asian men would have to earn $254K more than white men in order for white women to prefer them. Black men would have to earn $154K more. This shows that race trumps money in dating. Besides, one of the surveys literally asked "which ethnicity you find most attractive" and white women chose white men by a pretty huge margin.

Genuine question. Who are the most beautiful non-white women? by Poclurker in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

citing Lewis (2011)

Oh gee, probably the most ridiculous study I came across. I assume you haven't read it? Because I can't imagine how any person can take this seriously. This study consists of psychology professor giving his class of 18 (yes eighteen) students faces he pulled from Facebook and have them rate them on attractiveness. To his great satisfaction he found that blacks and mixed-race faces are the most attractive. Besides the fact that college students are unrepresentative sample of population and that sample size is absurdly small ( it's even less than 18 because only men rated female faces and vice versa so the actual sample size is half of that) it goes against every other finding in the literature. Not that author acknowledged that.

Funnily enough, this same guy published similar study in 2010 this time done on 20 of his students which found that mixed people are the most attractive. I guess writing short, easy-to-done studies to have any publication history at his name is his shtick.

Genuine question. Who are the most beautiful non-white women? by Poclurker in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yanet Garcia, J-Lo (back in the day), Maggie Q, Naomi Scott. Idk, there were others whose names I don't recall right now.

A lighthearted post: Who in your opinion are the most beautiful women in the world? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well I don't know their personalities so I can only judge by the looks.

A lighthearted post: Who in your opinion are the most beautiful women in the world? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are both brunettes with blue eyes. How are they opposite?

Yes, she looks like bimbo now (unfortunately >.<) but she looked great back in the day

A lighthearted post: Who in your opinion are the most beautiful women in the world? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For me, in no particular order

  • Megan Fox (pre-bogging)

  • Margot Robbie

  • Barbara Palvin

  • Candice Swanepoel

  • Emmanuelle Béart

  • Amber Heard

  • Diane Kruger

  • Ingrid Bergman

  • Vanessa Hessler

A lighthearted post: Who in your opinion are the most beautiful women in the world? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Kristina Pimenova

eww I thought cunnyfags were only on /tv/

355: Latest Hollywood Schlock Touting Girl Power and the Usual Multi-Culti Mousketeer Bullshit by Richard_Parker in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Note that it starts Diane (Heide)Kruger of Inglorious Basterds fame. Hate to see the pinnacle of German womanhood personified so corrupted and procured. If she did not fuck Harvey Weinstein, she fucked a lot of guys interchangeable with him.

uhh what? Has the schizo posting hour began already?

Meta-analysis suggests education causally raises IQ by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The effect is not on g.

Study from the same author: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445388/

Wikipedia's Race & IQ article is the most dishonest literature in all of human history. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are many sources on the approaches to IQ tests, but none that I know go the extra step and claim that a higher IQ is always a prediction of life outcomes,

You have one now.

See Table 1. IQ is better predictor of education, occupation and income than parental SES is. [1]

And IQ test scores are not traditionally the "driving force in racial inequality."

They are. Controlling for IQ eliminates racial gap in incomes, graduation rates and occupational status. In other words, if blacks had IQ of 100 there would be no racial gap in these three life outcomes. [1]

Regarding Murray's book, read this and other helpful reviews at Amazon:

In what way is it helpful? I only linked that book because I didn't want to bother looking for 10 different studies on cluster analysis. You can go straight to the bibliography if you don't like the book.

Wikipedia's Race & IQ article is the most dishonest literature in all of human history. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As for the article you've linked - thanks very much - I had not seen it. Two very important premises:

The first one is not important at all. What is intelligence and whether IQ tests measure intelligence may seem as important questions to address but they're really not. They are mostly used by race deniers to muddy the waters. Whatever it is that IQ tests measure we know that it predicts life outcomes and is the driving force of racial inequality. That is what's important. Whether we will call it intelligence or just some undefined mental trait is irrelevant.

The 2nd one is just plain wrong. The source for that claim is AAPA statement on racism which is purely political statement as is evidence by complete lack of any citations. Cluster analysis done by Cavalli-Sforza and others found that human populations are genetically distinctive in ways that correspond to self-identified race. As well as to the racial categories described by European racialists back in 18th and 19th century long before any genetic data were available.

If you really want to see some Research™ you can read chapter 7 of Human Diversity

IQ Scores for Adopted Children of Various Races - When Raised by White Parents by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This chart is compilation of multiple adoption studies. There is MTAS and the one of Korean kids in Belgium. It's weird they are included together because the other one did not have follow up at age 17. And the scores are supposed to be the average IQ at 7 and 17? I have the original book and the scores look quite different there.

https://imgpile.com/images/UQBSFS.png

Kyle Rittenhouse, Warlord of Kenosha is now collecting war brides by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is fake. No article of her mentions she gave him her phone number.

HBD spergs I have a question about ginger men by Markimus in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That kind of undermines your previous comment don't you think? If brown-eyed gingers are super common how is it special that brown-eyed ginger converts are super common?

What is the counter-argument against blacks/minorities getting sentenced more harshly than whites for the same crime? by Sapphire in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In Beaver et al. 2013 researchers compared criminal’s sentencing time after controlling for their verbal IQ and their self reported history of violence. They found that holding these variables constant completely eliminated the racial cap in sentencing.

Meta-analysis from 1998 finds that race is unrelated to criminal sentence length after controlling for offense type and prior criminal records (k = 47, n = 48,251).

This HAS TO be bullshit: Leftist studies that claim that "diversity" is a source of strength by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The second study found the exact opposite. Someone just lied about it.

Second, we find that subjects who are paired with a partner of a different race or nationality send back less money to their partner. Eleven out of the twelve times in which the recipient sent back nothing, the sender and the recipient were of different races. These effects are stronger than the social network effects and survive controls for the social connection of the sender and recipient. This finding is also unsurprising, but serves as a reminder of the continuing barriers that racial and national differences may create” (p.814)

This HAS TO be bullshit: Leftist studies that claim that "diversity" is a source of strength by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That paper found the exact opposite of what he's claiming

“Second, we find that subjects who are paired with a partner of a different race or nationality send back less money to their partner. Eleven out of the twelve times in which the recipient sent back nothing, the sender and the recipient were of different races. These effects are stronger than the social network effects and survive controls for the social connection of the sender and recipient. This finding is also unsurprising, but serves as a reminder of the continuing barriers that racial and national differences may create”

and in the abstract:

When individuals are closer socially, both trust and trustworthiness rise. Trustworthiness declines when partners are of different races or nationalities.

You can't make this shit up

This HAS TO be bullshit: Leftist studies that claim that "diversity" is a source of strength by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have this from that Vaush google doc, don't you? Here is a good response to it:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bT_Q3TXZX0ZjnNS_QMsR-MEPut7S5EIkFeAkIO7vEGI/edit

For instance, for the "enormous meta analysis":

“First, many of these studies measured ethnic diversity in a way that would call a half White half Black neighborhood and a half British American half German American neighborhood equally diverse. More specifically, ethnic diversity was often measured as the probability that two randomly selected two people from the same region would be of different ethnics groups were the list of possible ethnic groups included not 3-6 “races” but, rather, 100+ ethnic groups. Thus, many of these studies looked at ethnic, rather than racial, diversity. This is problematic because ethnic groups are far more genetically (and phenotypically) similar than races are.

The second problem with this meta-analysis is that many of the studies referenced controlled for the mechanisms by which ethnic diversity might damage social cohesion. For instance, many studies controlled for income inequality and crime. The results of such an analysis will be misleading because ethnic diversity might cause a decrease in social cohesion by causing an increase in crime and income inequality. Thus, many of these studies controlled for the effects of diversity and then concluded that diversity had not effect.

The worst of these are studies that actually controlled for racial diversity. For instance, Aizlewood and Pendakur (2005) and Andersen and Millligan (2011) both found that the proportion of a neighborhood which is non white negatively correlated with its level of social cohesion but that ethnic diversity had no, or a positive, impact on social cohesion, after controlling for the effects of variation in the size of the population that isn’t white! Several of these studies were counted as “failed replications” by Meet and Tolsma.”

The study of 200 students found the exact opposite of what Vaush is claiming:

Second, we find that subjects who are paired with a partner of a different race or nationality send back less money to their partner. Eleven out of the twelve times in which the recipient sent back nothing, the sender and the recipient were of different races. These effects are stronger than the social network effects and survive controls for the social connection of the sender and recipient. This finding is also unsurprising, but serves as a reminder of the continuing barriers that racial and national differences may create” (p.814)

and others:

Tatu Vanhanen analyzed 176 countries in the period from 2003-2011. He found that Ethnic diversity has 0.812 correlation with ethnic conflict. Meaning that more diverse countries tend to have more violent conflicts.

How to deal with lesbians in the ethnostate. by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you know what lesbians look like? The actual lesbians not the ones in porn. It is no loss if those women decide to remove themselves from the gene pool.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What even is the point of this comment? This is pretty bizarre even for your standards. It's like you got offended when OP said "black" in the title and you didn't want to leave that without a response but you couldn't think of anything meaningful so you put together this hogwash to at least have the last word.

Have Liberals/Leftists ever explained these photos of diversity being forced at gunpoint? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why is White students having to sit class with Black students worse than Black students getting a worse education and thus quality of life? And in regard to the Little Rock incident they can point to the state forces planning on opening fire on Black children which is morally and optically horrific.

They didn't get "worse education". This is a myth, stop saying that. Black schools right now get more funding per student, they have teachers with higher salary and more experience yet they still do worse academically then whites. There are no bad schools only bad students. But even if it all was true it doesn't justify the government sending troops to limit freedom of association of its people. What is this game you're playing here? "Blakpipo still have it worse so it doesn't count if your basic freedoms are being restricted"

Btw, what do you think would happen to the people in the photo if they didn't comply? You think power of white privilege would protect them from bayonets?

The jews aren't White theory doesn't really have a strong basis to be honest by Salos60000 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

definitely changed the gene pools of European populations.

Evidence? Because those wiki pages mention nothing like that.

An honest question to the pro-vax people on this sub, why do you trust the state on the vaccine issue? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am vaccinated though I wouldn't call myself pro-vax nor do I criticize those who are not. I trust the vaccine because I saw no good reason not to. I don't buy the idea that the elites are reducing the population, if anything, they want there to be more of us so they could have more workers. If anyone has any other arguments against the vaccine I would like to hear them.

Even when Blacks are a demographic majority, they still call themselves oppressed. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mixed population in Brazil is predominantly mestizos (whites + indians) not mulattoes (white + blacks)

Even when Blacks are a demographic majority, they still call themselves oppressed. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh you mean Howard Gardner's "multiple intelligences" theory. This is a good write up on it:

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/multiple-intelligences-emotional-intelligence-creativity-and-g/

Here are some highlights from the article:

Gardner admitted that “MI theory has few enthusiasts among psychometricians or others of a traditional psychological background” because they require “psychometric or experimental evidence that allows one to prove the existence of the several intelligences.”

here, Gardner himself admitted that MI theory is unfalsifiable because it can't be measured.

This lead the authors of this textbook to correctly conclude:

The Textbook “Introducing Neuroeducational Research: Neuroscience, Education and the Brain from Contexts to Practice” classifies multiple intelligences as a pseudoscience because it is unfalsifiable (there’s no way to show it’s wrong) and doesn’t make any predictions.

If you still aren't convinced consider these surveys of psychologists which found that they overwhelmingly favor a g-factor model of intelligence over specific abilities. [1] [2]

Even when Blacks are a demographic majority, they still call themselves oppressed. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(Other forms of intelligence are also measured and studied today. You can easily read about it.)

I would love to read about it.

Even when Blacks are a demographic majority, they still call themselves oppressed. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This has nothing to do with race mixing. Brazil just favored European immigration so the share of black population would get smaller and smaller.

IQ of South African Ethnic Groups by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These results are different than what Lynn tells us.

This is probably an outlier. Lynn has two pages on IQ of South African blacks and they cluster around 72.

https://imgpile.com/images/NvKAoP.png

Vladimir Putin says he’s not allowing Afghan refugees into Russia by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jared Taylor Vs EMJ Official Thread by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was quite of a shitshow. Didn't know EMJ is so spergy and immature. Best part for me was when he said that jews weaponize race by pretending it doesn't exist.

What???

Trump calls for bringing in Afghan refugees. Merkel and Macron rejects Afghan refugees by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh man, the seethe in retweets is someting else

How the fuck is Boris doing better than macron and Biden rn

Man all these protectors of liberalism are garbage human beings

The shit I want to say is untweetable. Ya Allah!

Anti-Muslim racism from France. How shocking

This is the poster boy of Europe’s self described “centrists”

I can't believe I am starting to like Macron.

edit: ok, maybe not

https://twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/1427383667245072388

🤢 🤮

Why have East Asian countries been 3rd world until recently, despite high IQ? by quickthrowaway in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It tends to be a staple on the alt right that IQ is very important in the development of advanced cultures/countries.

This is true but first you should know that the correlation between national IQ and GDP p.c. is between 0.59 - 0.7 depending on which type of correlation you use. This means that IQ alone explains between 35-50% of variation in GDP p.c. And while this is more than any other single variable (by far) there is still huge chunk unexplained.

To see what explains the rest we need to look at those countries whose GDP p.c. is higher (or lower) than what their IQ would predict and examine their specific local factors. When you do this you will notice discernible patterns among them. One cluster of such countries are Caribbean islands who live off of Western tourism and foreign investments. The others are Middle Eastern countries who got rich thanks to their large oil reserves.

Doing the same analysis, this time for countries with GDP p.c. lower then what they "should" have (among which is China) you will notice that the common variable among them is former or present socialist government. These include Eastern European nations, China, Mongolia, N. Korea, Vietnam. So to answer your question - it's due to socialism. Yes, IQ does mater a lot but there are things that can ruin your economy even if you have high IQ population.

You can read chapter 4 of Richard Lynn's book Intelligence A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences for more detailed explanation.

Sean Last is having a debate in 3 hours from now by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fucking hell, you were right man. She now calls herself "centrist host" lmao

Destiny vs Miyo [debate] by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, reminder that Sean Last will be debating some chick on the issue of systemic racism on this channel on Sunday.

Destiny vs Miyo [debate] by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know what, reading comments from Destiny fans on this video, I think you were right about the moderator having alt-right leanings.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just so you know, forced laughter is not an effective tool against cognitive dissonance.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to the conventional domestic violence narrative, judges historically have ignored or even shielded “wife beaters” as a result of the patriarchal prioritization of privacy in the home. This Article directly challenges that account. In the early twentieth century, judges regularly and enthusiastically protected female victims of domestic violence in the divorce and criminal contexts. As legal and economic developments appeared to threaten American manhood and traditional family structures, judges intervened in domestic violence matters as substitute patriarchs. They harshly condemned male perpetrators — sentencing men to fines, prison, and even the whipping post

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2589941

IN 1895 the women of Massachusetts were asked by the state whether they wished the suffrage. Of the 575,000 voting women in the state, only 22,204 cared for it enough to deposit in a ballot box an affirmative answer to this question. That is, in round numbers, less than four per cent wished to vote; about ninety-six per cent were opposed to woman suffrage or indifferent to it.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1903/09/why-women-do-not-wish-the-suffrage/306616/

Similarly, the anti-suffragette movement was predominantly female movement:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism#Notable_people

Kinda weird that the supposed "breeding slaves" with "no rights" were so comfortable with their position.

Also, women reported being happier in 1970s than they do now:

https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969

Also pretty strange since they should be happier as they gained "more rights" over time.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have no idea what you are talking about Almost everything you said was wrong. Domestic violence cases were regularly persecuted in courts, most women opposed suffragette movement, there is no bloke grabbing you ass. Feminists were pushing it enough with the catlling shit but this is just nonsense. Stop pretending to be such a victim all the time.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What world do you live in? Where the hell did you even read these things? This is crazy even for usual feminist talking points. Why are so many people upvoting this?

Debate youtube channel by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The host (Britanny) is a natural alt righter and it is clear that she has been indoctrinated

What makes you say that? She labels herself as leftwing in some videos and she liked all pro-Destiny comments on this one. What do you think is alt-right about her?

A hot take: Socialism is a more advanced form of government fit only for advanced races by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The thing is that socialism seemst to work well in some particular countries, like Germany, Sweden or Finland

These countries are not socialist. Stop with this Bernieesque meme

https://files.catbox.moe/you6z1.PNG

Communist China seeks to develop a race-based bio-weapon that targets and eliminates some human races while leaving other human races unharmed by peaceful in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This is so stupid do they not know race is a social construct created by Europeans to justify slavery? Do they not believe in science or what???

47% of West Coast Dems, 66% of Southern Republicans Want to Secede From U.S. by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Eastern European nations do have diplomatic contact with the world, they have taxation, they provide services and seem pretty independent. I'm not worried.

47% of West Coast Dems, 66% of Southern Republicans Want to Secede From U.S. by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wrong according to whom? The country you seceded from? Well, if that country no longer exists then does it really matter? And why would anyone care about the laws of the country you are trying to get freed from? Was the break down of Soviet Union legal? No but nobody cares because Soviets don't exists and have no army to enforce the breaking of their laws.

47% of West Coast Dems, 66% of Southern Republicans Want to Secede From U.S. by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Who said it would be legal?

Have Black people ever said "thank you" for all the nice things White people gave to them? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What do you think this proves? That whites invented race and that made blacks genocide each other.

Don't be ridiculous.

Have Black people ever said "thank you" for all the nice things White people gave to them? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What genocide? What enslavement? Blacks were already slaves in Africa before they were moved to America. And the only "forced" migration that comes to my mind is that of Southern blacks moving North. Blacks really don't appreciate how good they had it here.

Check out AltBase if you haven't already by AltBaseGuy in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also subscribe to s/strangestatistics

do you think single moms should be allowed to join the white nationalist movment by valkyria1488 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We have no membership. There is nothing to join. If you want to ask if single moms can believe in white nationalism (however that is defined) then yes.

DebateAltRight banned me, and this was my response by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Moreover, these authorities can be important, if they're earned the right to be authorities on a given subject. "Appealing to authority" is not necessarily a problem. Don't fear authorities. You're not 12.

Dude do you even know what appeal to authority means? And why that is fallacious?

Is it true that Cameroonian kids have better self control than German kids? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have explanation right in that article

A few years ago, she and her colleagues found evidence that the marshmallow test doesn't involve just self-control. It also measures how much a child trusts his environment — how much the child trusts that the researcher is really going to return with the second marshmallow.

"What also matters is kids' expectations about whether waiting will be worth it or not," Kidd says.

Because if you think about it, if the child doesn't believe that second marshmallow is actually going to arrive, then it makes sense to eat the first one.

"We have evidence that kids take under consideration the statistical nature of what has happened in the past," Kidd says. "So for example, if a child is living in an environment where there's a lot of uncertainty and instability, then they may think that waiting isn't likely to pay off even though they have the ability to delay gratification."

Nso parents are quite strict and consistent with their discipline. So, Kidd says, perhaps this consistent parenting boosts the kids' trust in adults — that when the person in charge says they're going to bring a second treat, they likely will.

What I think is more likely is that this is a fluke result. Studies on self-control, whether Marshmallow test or real-life applications, consistently find racial difference in opposite direction.

Wany, Rieger, and Hens (2011) utilized a sample of 5,291 university students from 45 countries and gave participants a chance to choose an immediate monetary reward or a larger long term reward. This chart shows the proportion of people from different regions that chose the larger and less immediate reward. https://thealternativehypothesis.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Wait-by-Country.jpg

Africa is at the bottom, Germany at the top.

Did anyone here archive the old DebateAltRight Reddit sub? by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I archived some threads I considered important

https://pastebin.com/KU1EsS4q

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh goodie. We have poisoning the well, appeal to authority, appeal to popularity all in single comment. All this due to a screenshot of studies from Lynn's book. Studies that weren't even made by Lynn. Amazin'

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ahh okay, but that's false. Mixed race people have IQ that is intermediate between IQs of their parents.

https://files.catbox.moe/ip9dax.png

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you read any of the links you posted? Because I doubt it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html

https://www.quora.com/Are-children-of-mixed-races-more-intelligent-than-those-of-a-homogeneous-gene-pool

These refer to the same study posted by OP. He even posted the same Dailymail article as you did.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjEtN3ag8_xAhXH_rsIHf1xDo4QFnoECAgQAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2624-8611%2F1%2F1%2F10%2Fpdf&usg=AOvVaw2zAAsMctM881I9zjw5U71L

The sample size for the black-Japanese group was 6. Yes, N=6.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyferth_study

The section on hereditarian interpretation is a good summary of why this paper is essentially useless. However I would add this article by AltHype. In short, Eyferth study supports hereditarian explanation more than the environmentalist one.

https://www.brookings.edu/research/multi-racial-adolescents-show-no-test-score-gap-with-whites/

Problem with this is that they don't specify what kind of multiracial we are talking about. Because hapas score higher than mulattoes. And slightly higher than whites so this wouldn't be surprising. And considering that most black-white people identify as black rather than multiracial I would say we are looking at the test scores of hapas.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100414092523.htm

This study consists of a psychology professor having his class of 20 (twenty) white psychology students rate faces of people he pulled form Facebook. To his great satisfaction he found that mixed race people are rated as the most attractive. Unfortunately, data from dating websites with N= 500,000 reveal that whites prefer rate own race to be most attractive indicating strongly non-representative sample of his raters. This guy is quite funny though. He made similar study one year later this time with 40 students again finding to his satisfaction that mixed race people are most attractive! What a great news.

The rest has nothing to do with anything. I tried to find some pattern there but you're all over the place. There is one butthurt reply to Bell Curve from 1995, one study about intelligence of infants, article on James Watson, a paper about Hans Eysenck which argues for hereditarianism btw and one paywalled New Yorker article.

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The study I found said that it is a GOOD thing because the mixed kids will be smarter and taller.

This study found no such thing. I see it misrepresented by journalists all the time. I guess because they used term like "genetic diversity" it made them think of brown people. But no, this study has nothing to do with mixed race people. Judging by this comment

We think genetic diversity decreases the chances of inheriting defecting copies of the same gene from both father and mother,” said Peter Joshi, first author of the study, The Independent reported.

They just found that non-inbred people are taller and smarter than inbred people. Which is to be expected. Race mixing results in intermediacy of traits. Children will have IQ or height or whatever as is the mean of the races they are composed of.

Did White People Invent the Idea of Race? Jared Taylor demolishes a stupid and dangerous fable. by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Great video. I knew Romans and Greeks had concept of race but I didn't know they were such a racial supremacists

“There is a long-standing tradition in Greek and Latin literature of idealizing the concepts of unmixed origin, pure lineage, and autochthony.” Autochthony means being the original people in a place. “This entails explicit statements that intermarriage between peoples produces descendants of inferior quality – physical, mental, and moral – while consistent marriage between men and women belonging to the same people will result in superior beings.” “The quality of an entire people is determined by lineage and origin only, and will be stable if protected against outside contamination.” “Autochthony – being a native – assumes a physical relationship between man and land which, by definition, turns an immigrant or descendant of immigrants into an inferior being.”

Now compare this to what shitlibs say how Rome was multiracial paradise where no one cared what race you were as long as you were Roman. lol what a delusional people.

Claim: Crime plummeted as America browned by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand that since the 1970s or so, crime and violent crime has decreased sharpl

No it didn't. Violent crime started falling since the 90s. And even now there is higher murder rate than in 1950s. So no, it adds up.

What's wrong with miscegenation? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

members of the same species tend to mate and reproduce without regards to their subspecies/breed. it's normal and natural, all animals do it

No it's not and they do not.

Jewish woman writes doctoral thesis on why US justice system is racist against blacks, and then is stabbed to death by blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The approach is however obviously biased, and does not appear to balance other factors that have caused problems - especially in southern hemisphere countries - many of which have been in debt to northern hemisphere countries since the end of colonial occupation, or have had - as in Eastern Europe, China and South Asia - extreme income inequality and political corruption. It's not that he's cherry-picking countries, but that a study of ethnic conflicts since the 1990 in all countries are due to new pressures in those places and thus they cannot be exemplars for critiques of diversity during this period

First, colonial debt is a myth. Quite contrary, third world countries get generous payments in foreign aid from the West. And second, how is any of this relevant? Vanhanen tested how economic variables contribute to ethnic conflicts independently of diversity and they basically do not.