Indeed, he was also both politically and societally/administratively excellent which is also rare. Most people are stuck in either Personal thinking (individual tastes and preferences IE racist libtards), Societal thinking (domestic policy focus with ignorance of power IE most of the New Right), or Political thinking(cold realists, military strategists etc).

Arnold Leese: personal thinker

Oswald Mosley: societal thinker

Francis Parker Yockey: political thinker

Had Mosley and Yockey collaborated they could have had a good basis for pan-Europe but Mosley was too stuck in the anti-Communist mindset and Yockey seemed to lack patience and 'agreeableness' IE if people disagreed with him he'd just write them off and think of them as idiotic.

Hitler was able to be both great in societal thinking and political thinking, it seems his only issue was his lack of trust in other people's competence, ironically, mixed with his loyalty to friends and willingness to give them positions for loyalty rather than choosing someone more competent. The obvious example is Goering's position for rewarding loyalty, and the example of him taking on too much responsibility and not delegating is also in the military side where he seemingly tried to manage all strategy in all branches of the military. There's a Prussian Socialism episode about Manstein's book where Greg Conte and 'Hans' talk about this stuff.