The benefits of diversity to millions of non-whites outweigh the costs to a comparatively few whites.

submitted by Groundround from self.debatealtright

Debate?

all 16 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No because I don't give a fuck about them, I give a fuck that my ancestors built a country and my people currently maintain it while jews run it taking all the benefits for themselves whilst making us work more and more for less and less to 'elevate' the non-whites.

Sure from the perspective of black people who get to enjoy free houses and cars by simply not paying any loans back it's cool for them, but when white people have to pay shlomo 5x the interest to cover all of the black people's loans it becomes a problem. Then when there's no more blood left to squeeze from whitey what happens? The 2008 financial crash, it'll happen again and again.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I don't shill for Palestinians to be in England

    [–]MainMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Okay I trust you bro. Sorry for the hostile tone, but the DR is filled to the brim with Third Worldism.

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Do you know what diversity benefits and in what circumstances?

    [–]Groundround[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Think of the 10s of millions of people who have been elevated to the modern world. I’m not saying it’s without consequences to the host people. But are the consequences really comparable to the benefits?

    [–]Mastermustard09 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    A nation's success or failure depends on the quality of its human capital. Africans are the destroyers of civilization for this reason. A "diverse" nation can only keep chugging along if it has a majority of higher races ie Europeans, high caste Indians and East Asians. It will lack national character and will be a soulless resource extraction center but it won't collapse due to dysfunction.

    Europe, however, will soon resemble Brazil or South America due to projected demographic change. The modern world won't be found here much longer. Blacks/south Asians are biological weapons.

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Debate?

    Japan is non-white, they don't import diversity, and they're still doing great.

    I rather more countries be like them and are self-sufficient, then become another Brazil or South Africa where the races are forever at each other's throats.

    [–]Groundround[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Think of the 10s of millions of people who have been elevated to the modern world. I’m not saying it’s without consequences to the host people. But are the consequences really comparable to the benefits?

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    A parasite will always benefit living off its hosts. Yet we still pays tons of money to keep our Pets clean of them.

    In fact, I haven't even touched on welfare. The same White countries are being taxed to death having to feed someone else. What happens when the country collapses on account of having no more money?

    [–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Group rights are always evil.

    [–]petitor_veritatis1 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Access to White people is not a human right. Why is it our responsibility to help them and not theirs?

    [–]Groundround[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Compassion?

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Whites are 9% of world population and declining. Many of the non whites we import are used against us as weapons by a small group of very wealthy and connected people. Those wealthy elites want to see whites disappear as an ethnic group. Dissidents or alt right people, what ever you want to call us, don't lack compassion. We simply want to survive and thrive. We simply want racial and ethnic sovereignty like so many other groups around the world claim. If whites disappear from the earth there will be far far less compassion, invention and innovation.

    I encourage you to watch this simple video on the numbers of non white foreigners we are dealing with. We can't 'help' the world by importing it into our borders.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDceLiPLHWQ

    If your goal is really 'compassion' towards people that should extend to whites as well right? Why should whites continue to allow non whites into their lands that then leads to our genocide? If you want to be more compassionate to people you need to investigate the jewish faction living in many countries that exploit people and play them against eachother for money and power. Jewish banking, corporate power and government power all work together to form world government that benefits themselves and exploits non Jews. Investigate that if you want more compassion in the world.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmKcU0jeqVw

    [–]Groundround[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Thanks

    [–]JapsDoEverythingRiteBlack Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    There are two issues I see here.

    The first is whether or not Whites are required to pay the costs for exalting struggling groups of non-Whites. They are not, and Whites should have the reserved rights to this. This is especially true for non-Whites who claim it is the responsibility of Whites to do so. Why should Whites be responsible for the well-being of non-Whites who don't make the effort to participate in society, especially for those non-Whites who hate them? You could point out examples of people who are successful that were not 70 or so years ago, but many here could also point out the costs to Whites, which should not be underestimated. Why should Whites have to contribute to their own death?

    The second is about the nature of diversity initiatives themselves. Much of the rhetoric around them is pejorative towards Whites, and many of these supporters are openly anti-White. In their minds, all Whites have committed unspeakable acts against non-Whites and must pay for their transgressions against them, an anyone who is opposed to this kind of mentality is evil. Whites are expected to participate in a society that requires their capital but also drags them into the mud. How is that not infuriating?

    To extol diversity, Whites must accept being attacked by niggers and spics while chinks and streetshitters outcompete them in higher institutions while the values that defined White countries are eroded by faggots and jews. All of this while being called oppressors and devils. I don't think it is unreasonable to be upset by that nor to have a desire for White nations.

    [–]Groundround[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Thanks