Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Appeal to what? Who is appealing to anything? I told you that the world leaders are at the UN and you replied "World leaders LOL"

That's because you're literally ignorant of the fact that - it's the general assembly and the world leaders are literally there listening to the security council.

So nobody appealed to anything. I just informed you about something you didn't know, that's all.

So the world leaders were there and perhaps heard the rashist ambassador once again repeat his propaganda, once again bring rashists like roger waters to back up their fake worldview. But it isn't working. Because the facts of the matter, as reported to each world leader by their institutions and advisors and public opinion, and universities and spies and all the other things I mentioned - are directly counter to the rashist worldview.

Here's an example

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_ES-11/4

It's just not working, for the UNSC amb to again reiterate their fake world view. It's not convincing anyone and hasn't since Feb 2022. But I can see why your deficient brain is making you think otherwise

BREAKING: Elon Musk fires entire X ‘election integrity’ team by P-38lightning in politics

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry but that sounds loopy

  1. Why would a business manager care about long versus short meetings? I have been in three hour meetings before. I have been in all day sessions before. With company leaders who also typically hold multi hours meetings. It just doesn't make sense that business leaders would use furniture to make everyone wrap up their meetings too soon

  2. If manager think their employees are slacking by using long meetings, the way to address that, is not furniture

  3. The people who design the furniture and decorations and layout, in every place I ever worked, is not the company directors. Which company executive is approving meeting room furniture layouts? None of them

  4. I watched the video again and didn't see anything out of the ordinary or that looked differently to my experience of working in lots of offices over the years, and my experience says you're talking out of your derrière

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're just being argumentative for the sake of it. It was YOU who bought up the recent UNSC bullshit on 26th September. It's a simple matter of fact that world leaders are in town for the general assembly.

UN summit of world leaders

September 27, 2023

https://apnews.com/article/unga-2023-by-numbers-eb5b07b3f12cd40b2e22f1de19dd4cc7

Your lack of knowledge led you to make a silly mistake, because you defaulted to "top mind" argumentative asshole.

I dont know why you chose to link to an image macro instead of just asking. Probably another deficiency of yours

‘Trust the Experts’: 1,600 Scientists Sign Declaration Denouncing Climate Change Hoax by zyxzevn in ClimateSkeptics

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry who is "they", are you referring to the 1600 signatures?

Ukrainian SS In Britain (many of whom later emigrated to Canada) - Postwar SS-Galizien Division Refugees by hfxB0oyA in history

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Didn't any part of your brain say "huh wait a second, what was the name of the program, what channel was this on, why was it pulled, why are there no facts or data points cited"

I think most people's brains seek out evidence and it's kind of interesting that yours just blithely accepts everything you hear.

By the way, did you brain also process the statement at 6:00 that THE SUPPOSED SS MEMBERS MUTINED AGAINST HITLER AND FOUGHT FOR THE FRENCH RESISTANCE

That kind of seems like a relevant point to UK backing them.

Also.

https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1707783850506776894

‘Trust the Experts’: 1,600 Scientists Sign Declaration Denouncing Climate Change Hoax by zyxzevn in ClimateSkeptics

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One of the first names listed is con artist "lord" monkton, which is pretty worrying.

Also - it says - page 3: "anthropogenic factors cause warming"

In other words they believe humans are making the climate hotter.

These people are signing a declaration that humans are making the world hotter....

BREAKING: Elon Musk fires entire X ‘election integrity’ team by P-38lightning in politics

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What did you see that made you think they are designed to be uncomfortable

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, a YouTube personality up against the five permanent members and rotating council of world leaders.

I can imagine you must be celebrating - surely only three more days until Kyiv?

When world leaders are presented with .

  1. The output of their civil service, institutions, universities, public opinion, international opinion, their intelligence arms, etc etc

Versus

  1. Some dipshit rashist from the internet

I can see why you'd feel very confident about that. I don't think I would, in your shoes, but I can see how your peculiar deficiencies would make you think that

BREAKING: Elon Musk fires entire X ‘election integrity’ team by P-38lightning in politics

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, in the video I saw, the lady taking the film had at least two meetings, one in the pod and one in person in the meeting room. That seems like work - maybe she had to do stuff in preparation for, of after the call.

Also it's not good tiktok to be like "and now I spent 45 minutes going through an excel to delete all the apostrophes so it will load into the dw properly" or whatever

BREAKING: Elon Musk fires entire X ‘election integrity’ team by P-38lightning in politics

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have no idea what you saw in the video that seems bad? What things in that video do you feel musk will change. For example will musk get rid of employee catering or the on-site exercise areas

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🤡

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🤡

You're confidently incorrect and you come off as a clown.

Thousands and thousands of Ukrainians can explain to you, why they came out on the streets for the Revolution of Dignity.

For me, given the choice between believing first hand experience from thousands of people, versus believing you, a painted internet clown - it's not hard to work out who is lying

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can't say that I've ever watched it, ever in my life.

But it makes sense, that you'd come to that kind of assumption.

Your worldview requires that everyone not in 100% agreement with you is a brainwashed sheep. You can't allow yourself to realise, that people come to rational conclusions based on the evidence, because then your brain will realise that you don't really have any evidence

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah I made up my own mind after a rational assessment of the evidence.

I'm sure it's convenient for you to pretend that everyone who disagrees with you, is just gullible and would believe hitler.

That's a convenience which you afford yourself, but you're buying on credit, and sinking further into a debt of unreality and fake worldviews

This War Wasn't Just Provoked — It Was Provoked Deliberately. The US intelligence cartel was fully aware that the US was taking actions ensuring that that would happen. Off ramp after off ramp was sped past by the US war machine at a hundred miles an hour on its beeline toward a horrific proxy war. by Chipit in WorldNews

[–]Site_rly_sux 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a ninety minute long video. Is there any specific point in the video that you feel backs up your point?

It wouldn't even be evidence anyway, because the secretary general of NATO is not a job that decides when or why russia goes to war. Putin didn't just record long videos for you, back in Feb 22, he also wrote long ass essays "on the brotherly relationship" or whatever. Putin explained exactly why he was going to war: he said it's because Peter's Rossiya empire doesn't make any logical sense without Ruthenia.

He said "If you want decommunisation then let's go all the way, no half measures" remember how he recorded a video of himself saying that and then uploaded it to the internet and then invaded Ukraine.

It's because russia / Z / Putin / Dugin has his own view of history. You're not capturing it correctly when you just say "durr it's about NATO". There's also the biolabs, the supersoldiers, the crucified children, the banderamobiles driving around the cities, a whole host of ruthenian issues that you aren't capturing.

You should pay more attention to Putin who explained it a lot better than Jens

Why is chipit linking you to NATO and not the direct word of president Vladimirovic himself? Is it because chipit is a psyop? People ought to ask themselves

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you not understand an interim government was installed

Lol clown

Your link says the government was installed by.... Ukrainian MPs.

And where is the chocolatier now? In the territorial defense units. Yes, the chocolatier who you believe was installed....went onto hold a free and fair election and then left power to run his chocolate business.

There's zero proof of a foreign coup and thousands and thousands of individuals who can tell you what inspired them to take part in the revolution of dignity. Between your unsourced clownery, versus thousands of peoples' testimony about their own lives....I know which one is credible.

You're a laughable clown.

Take this shit to someone else that still has a chance of believing you.

Your rashist fake news agitprop is getting nowhere with me, dipshit

ETA - any why the fuck are you addressing this to me anyway? Sounds like your problem is with OP who believes that Putin is a stooge. Sounds like OP is not aligned with your ruzzian view of history. You should complain to him - he's the only one here who has demonstrated the low IQ required to actually believe your Z-history shit

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You must not realize

I realise just fine, thanks.

The cause of this war was NATO

Lol

interim government installed

Lol

kill "Russian backed separatists".

I think this is called "return fire"

🤡

Interesting. Thanks ChatGPT. by Chipit in memes

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Be careful what you advocate for. Because I am eyeing you and an additional 12% of the population to put into camps, because I think you're causing problems for my herd

"He is a Ukrainian hero and a Canadian hero, and we thank him for all his service" - Trudeau, Zelensky, & Canadian Parliament give standing ovation to former Waffen SS stormtrooper by hfxB0oyA in politics

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He should stand back and stand by like the other Nazis, then saidit would have nothing but good things to say

Interesting. Thanks ChatGPT. by Chipit in memes

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What if there's millions of people in the 13% who didn't do anything wrong? Should they still be removed? Answer wisely as it will decide your own fate

Warmonger russian presence is Karabakh is being demilitarized by antiwar 🇦🇿....Lots and lots of dead muscovite soldiers in the Caucasus this week. Zero response possible from the demilitarized Z empire by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Top Russian Officer Among Troops Killed During Azerbaijan's Attack On Nagorno-Karabakh

https://www.rferl.org/a/top-russia-navy-officer-killed-azerbaijan-nagorno-karabakh/32602846.html

Putin's 'Mini-NATO' in Peril as Russian Peacekeepers Killed by Azeri Troops

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-nato-csto-russian-peacekeepers-killed-nagorno-karabakh-1828792

What can Lavrov do about it? Fuck all

https://tass.ru/politika/18822645

The head of the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, Jeyhun Bayramov, at a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on the sidelines of the 78th session of the UN General Assembly, assured that the investigation into the death of servicemen of the Russian peacekeeping corps in Karabakh is yielding results and those responsible will be punished.

The Russian diplomatic department indicated that the Azerbaijani side “again apologized to Russia for the tragic death” of Russian peacekeepers.

The Russian Foreign Ministry noted that the parties discussed the situation in the region with an emphasis on its humanitarian component and international problems.

Biden will accelerate the end of the war: Sending ATACMS to further demilitarize the aggressor by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Happy to provide further sources.

The china map update was to include the entirety of this island as part of China, the north half of which is considered sovereign ruzzian federation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshoy_Ussuriysky_Island

https://www.newsweek.com/bolshoy-ussuriysky-island-russia-china-map-dispute-territory-1823763

https://www.eurasiareview.com/07092023-chinas-provocative-cartographic-moves-unpacking-geopolitical-fallout-of-controversial-new-map-analysis/

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-breaks-silence-china-map-disputed-islands-1823983

The 1420 channel on YouTube have been asking ruzzians on the street what they think about it.

https://youtu.be/1S1a8Udpfgc?si=GVhPgIOm49Aigktk

Make your own conclusions from the video, but I saw that most ruzzians are having to pretend it isn't happening

Meanwhile the 5th Combined Army was moved from guarding the Chinese border to be buried at at veliky novosilka

https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/1676829516835049473

Biden will accelerate the end of the war: Sending ATACMS to further demilitarize the aggressor by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Would it bother you, if I called you a shit stain?

About as bothered as I am reading it from you..

Chipit has a handy copypasta for what you can do

Seymour Hersh: “It’s All Lies. The War is Over. Russia has Won." by Oyveygoyim in WorldPolitics

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't think Ukraine can win, because you live in the saidit world of alternative facts.

In the real world, Ukraine have done some extremely interesting things over the past few weeks. Crimea is now demilitarized. You can't argue that. There are no air force or navy based in Crimea anymore. They all went back to novorossia. That's a successful operation by Ukraine.

Here is a very interesting tweet from the ISW today.

https://twitter.com/TheStudyofWar/status/1704815837100523528

By this time in the Normandy campaign, the allies were dealing with the Market Garden failure and were three months away from winning the Battle of the Bulge.

Have a look at this also extremely interesting interview from yesterday with Ukraine's GRU chief

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/exclusive-interview-with-ukraines-spy-boss-from-his-dc-hotel-room

He explains how ruzzia is being demilitarized behinds the lines too.

Their assets all across ruzzia are being picked off by drones. At the secure government airport in moscow their doomsday airplanes and recon jets and all kinds of interesting military jet liners are being taken down, one by one, and the factories where they were built burned down so they can never be recreated, and their foreign purchasers swapped for Ukrainian-built drones so russia can never militarize again.

Meanwhile the Baltic became a NATO lake. That's an absolute loss and was caused by Ukrainian victory.

Also Armenia is now absolutely divorced from russia and Georgian Dream have been almost-overthrown multiple times. Putin has an international arrest warrant that will never go away. The sanctions are breaking down aeroflot one by one. On multiple times in August and September, aeroflot have had to crash land in fields. They don't have roads - you cannot drive across ruzzia because they don't have roads. Because of sanctions, travel in their country will literally return to trains and horse drawn carts. They don't have any ball bearings for new trains and partisans keep blowing up tracks.

There's a chronic diesel shortage in ruzzia and farmers in large parts of the country are unable to harvest. Their crude oil exports are under a Lloyds of London price cap - so ruzzian oil can never travel by sea unless it's being sold at a discount.

The illusion of Putin was shattered when Utkin drove to Moscow and Prigozyn set up a breakaway state in Rostov for one afternoon. The regime image can never recover. They have been on continuous purges of wagner-connected elements ever since, which was everyone, because Wagner were everywhere.

Africa. Okay I'll give you this.

Russia is winning in the coup belt. The Ukraine war has worked to expand the coup belt for russia. However - easy come easy go. I don't think they'll be around long enough to exploit the additional billion dollars or so in annual revenue from the gold and gem slave mines.

Overall this is a complete shambles for Putin and a victory for Ukraine. Please put forward your theory of how it could be otherwise, in as much detail as I've gone into

ETA - this week, azeris shot up a car full of uniformed russian army officer peacekeepers, and all shoigu could do was write a stern letter. It's because of Ukraine. To lose that kind of face in this part of the world is irrecoverable.

Additionally, China revised their map to include part of an island which russia considers sovereign russian federation. China now says: it's outer Manchuria, and by the way, we haven't forgotten those unequal treaties you made us sign.

Again, it's face loss, there is no russian army guarding Manchuria for the first time in almost 200 years, and it's due to Ukraine's victory

Biden will accelerate the end of the war: Sending ATACMS to further demilitarize the aggressor by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't think Ukraine can win, because you live in the saidit world of alternative facts.

In the real world, Ukraine have done some extremely interesting things over the past few weeks. Crimea is now demilitarized. You can't argue that. There are no air force or navy based in Crimea anymore. They all went back to novorossia. That's a successful operation by Ukraine.

Here is a very interesting tweet from the ISW today.

https://twitter.com/TheStudyofWar/status/1704815837100523528

By this time in the Normandy campaign, the allies were dealing with the Market Garden failure and were three months away from winning the Battle of the Bulge.

Have a look at this also extremely interesting interview from yesterday with Ukraine's GRU chief

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/exclusive-interview-with-ukraines-spy-boss-from-his-dc-hotel-room

He explains how ruzzia is being demilitarized behinds the lines too.

Their assets all across ruzzia are being picked off by drones. At the secure government airport in moscow their doomsday airplanes and recon jets and all kinds of interesting military jet liners are being taken down, one by one, and the factories where they were built burned down so they can never be recreated, and their foreign purchasers swapped for Ukrainian-built drones so russia can never militarize again.

Meanwhile the Baltic became a NATO lake. That's an absolute loss and was caused by Ukrainian victory.

Also Armenia is now absolutely divorced from russia and Georgian Dream have been almost-overthrown multiple times. Putin has an international arrest warrant that will never go away. The sanctions are breaking down aeroflot one by one. On multiple times in August and September, aeroflot have had to crash land in fields. They don't have roads - you cannot drive across ruzzia because they don't have roads. Because of sanctions, travel in their country will literally return to trains and horse drawn carts. They don't have any ball bearings for new trains and partisans keep blowing up tracks.

There's a chronic diesel shortage in ruzzia and farmers in large parts of the country are unable to harvest. Their crude oil exports are under a Lloyds of London price cap - so ruzzian oil can never travel by sea unless it's being sold at a discount.

The illusion of Putin was shattered when Utkin drove to Moscow and Prigozyn set up a breakaway state in Rostov for one afternoon. The regime image can never recover. They have been on continuous purges of wagner-connected elements ever since, which was everyone, because Wagner were everywhere.

Africa. Okay I'll give you this.

Russia is winning in the coup belt. The Ukraine war has worked to expand the coup belt for russia. However - easy come easy go. I don't think they'll be around long enough to exploit the additional billion dollars or so in annual revenue from the gold and gem slave mines.

Overall this is a complete shambles for Putin and a victory for Ukraine. Please put forward your theory of how it could be otherwise

ETA - this week, azeris shot up a car full of uniformed russian army officer peacekeepers, and all shoigu could do was write a stern letter. It's because of Ukraine. To lose that kind of face in this part of the world is irrecoverable.

Additionally, China revised their map to include part of an island which russia considers sovereign russian federation. China now says: it's outer Manchuria, and by the way, we haven't forgotten those unequal treaties you made us sign.

Again, it's face loss, there is no russian army guarding Manchuria for the first time in almost 200 years, and it's due to Ukraine's victory

Biden will accelerate the end of the war: Sending ATACMS to further demilitarize the aggressor by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Boo boo poor snowflake baby

Seymour Hersh: “It’s All Lies. The War is Over. Russia has Won." by Oyveygoyim in WorldPolitics

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ukraine IS winning buddy. And they're on track to fully demilitarize muscovia

Biden will accelerate the end of the war: Sending ATACMS to further demilitarize the aggressor by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Prolong? There is no end to this war unless interested and responsible parties like America make it happen.

Secondly, not all of the Ukrainian soldiers will be in small arms contact with the enemy during the time between now and the next ammo delivery. So I have no idea why you bought that up. Did you believe that 100% of the soldiers are in small arms contact with the enemy?

Biden will accelerate the end of the war: Sending ATACMS to further demilitarize the aggressor by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Biden is doing just fine.

Seymour Hersh: “It’s All Lies. The War is Over. Russia has Won." by Oyveygoyim in WorldPolitics

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow so all four claimed oblasts are under Z control?

The saloreich ukrop junta were removed?

Ukraine will never enter NATO?

Azov will face terrorism trials for crucifying that boy?

In that case it should just be a three day operation now. See you in maidan square on monday

Biden will accelerate the end of the war: Sending ATACMS to further demilitarize the aggressor by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not really something people can agree to disagree on. It's not something where you can say "I have my truth and you have yours". It's simply incorrect that Biden is as you describe, and three+ years of insisting it's true just detracts from the right's credibility.

At least, insist upon something where you can have some leeway to claim that it's happening. Anyone can watch Biden's appearances this week, including before the UN general assembly, and see that you're wrong.

Nature is healing: war criminal and Black Sea Admiral Solokov sent to the big Hague in the sky. Reality tends towards an antiwar outcome by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck I spelled his katsap name wrong

Source right now is Crimean Wind partisan group, крымский ветер on TG.

He's a war criminal, and if this strike didn't kill him, he will spend the rest of his days in prison

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/05/25/7403914/index.amp

Putin is a boogeyman and controlled opposition by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't need to go looking for hidden conspiracies when everything lines up and the story makes 100% sense.

Actually the story makes less sense and is more disjointed if you add a hidden conspiracy.

Postulating a hidden conspiracy should serve to make the story make more sense, not less.

The story of KGB head Putin rising through St Pburg mayoralty office, becoming Vice President under Yeltsin, and then taking over and eliminating all opposition and beginning a reign of misinformation and torture....that all makes sense and lines up.

The story of the war makes sense and lines up.

If you introduce the theory that Putin is controlled, then the facts make even less sense. Things make a lot more sense when you accept that Putin is exactly what he appears to be: the spy and killer that ruzzia wants ruling them to expand their borders.

There's nothing about Putin which is weird, abnormal or out of line with russia's history.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oprichnik

You would need to also explain how Ivan the terrible was controlled opposition too

The Plot to Destroy Russell Brand Is a Message to All of Us and a Trial Balloon to Test Outrage by Oyveygoyim in corruption

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In May 2007, Brand called Jimmy Savile, who suggested the pair could meet if Brand brought along a sister. Brand doesn’t have a sister, so instead offered to bring a female employee — agreeing, on Savile’s request, that she should be naked. “I’ve got a personal assistant,” he said. “And part of her job description is that anyone I demand she greet, meet, massages, she has to do it. She’s very attractive, Jimmy.” This was four years before Savile’s death and five years before details of the Jim’ll Fix It presenter’s crimes were exposed.

https://archive.ph/mP8ff

The Plot to Destroy Russell Brand Is a Message to All of Us and a Trial Balloon to Test Outrage by Oyveygoyim in corruption

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Need to double check the Epstein connection because I don't see Russel under B in the black book.

But he definitely partied with elite child sex procurer Jimmy Saville

The Plot to Destroy Russell Brand Is a Message to All of Us and a Trial Balloon to Test Outrage by Oyveygoyim in corruption

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How is it a plot? The dude publicly behaved like a nonce for decades

His name is in Epstein's little book

He was friends with Jimmy Saville

He's a rapist

It's not a plot

Site_rly_sux is a gish galloping troll that just wants to waste your time - don't engage by ID10T in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like you're finally ready to video chat with me

Most people want to be ruled by siliconmorpheus in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay so most people want live in a country with elected officials and therefore you are totally wrong when you say "most people want to be ruled". To find out more, I suggest you compare the OP which you wrote with this post here which you wrote

Nato is Preparing for an Army of 3.5 Million to Fight Russia - New Patriot [28.58] by doginventer in conspiracy

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What makes you think russia would pose a challenge to NATO? Himars, storm shadow, gepards, nasams, are all legacy western NATO tech and totally outclassed the russian army. They literally wouldn't stand a chance against NATO's standby forces, let alone some mass conscription

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

calling them a "child"

Tell me you didn't read the story without telling me you didn't read the story

"The Child" was Brand's pet name for the child he was raping

Most people want to be ruled by siliconmorpheus in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's the difference? The difference solely depends on whether your paranoid imagination is active or not

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your thoughts on this are also some that I didn't want to hear. Go and have this debate with a woman you trust IRL and ask her

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey sorry in the UK "the government" or HMG refers to the PM and the cabinet. Some random MP wouldn't be referred to as "the government". So I am not tied in knots, thanks for your concern, there's absolutely no sense in which some random MP out of 600 would be referred to as "the government"

How NATO caused the Ukraine War - Judge Napolitano with Scott Ritter by zyxzevn in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because they still need him as a pro-putin guest

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay show me where you saw

They aren't investigating it

Where did you see this

they aren't challenging it

Bruh

Click here

https://archive.ph/mP8ff

Ctrl + F

"When contacted by The Times and Sunday Times"

And scroll down from there

Paragraph after paragraph of researched claims and documented examples

Paragraph upon paragraph of people reached for comment and asked for their side of the story

And you wrote

they aren't getting other sides of the story.

See this is just telling me that you didn't even read it. And you're building a fake reality off of what you imagine its contents to be. Along with fake imaginary scenarios based on something that happened to your wife. You're totally nuts, and not at all credible

Defeated, demilitarized Black Sea war fleet is withdrawing from occupied Crimea (russia will soon retcon that they never needed Sevastopol anyway) by Site_rly_sux in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://archive.ph/Y32eb

Here is a long a more detailed WSJ article

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh okay so you're saying, that because you have eyes to see, you saw this somewhere in the article. In that case, please point it out, because I absolutely accuse you of literally pulling it all out of your ass to avoid acknowledging that the creepy sex pervert is also a rapist.

They aren't investigating it, they aren't challenging it, they aren't getting other sides of the story. They're just taking down what somebody says, dressing it up to make it more entertaining to read on the toilet, and publishing it.

How NATO caused the Ukraine War - Judge Napolitano with Scott Ritter by zyxzevn in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Repeat offender pedophile Scott Ritter who is the last remaining English language pro-putin guest for these guys

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay so it's, literally, all coming from your imagination.

But you weigh it more credibly than the actual evidence.

An imaginary series of events is overriding the actual reported reality

And because your wife had some bullshit happen, therefore, his multiple rape victims were not raped and it's just the Illuminati trying to shut down a YouTube rabble rouser

Literally none of the pieces fit together. It's mad libs. And your brain is insisting on such a mad series of words to escape having to condemn a pervert sex creep and rapist. I mean jeez man look at any of his public appearances during the period. He doesn't, or at the time didn't, respect womens' personal space, in public, over and over. He's an admitted sex addict. It's the times not the daily express. The preponderance of evidence is all aligned. The victims have paperwork and text messages. It's "Dispatches", who take down crooked NHS trust chiefs and groping MPs, this is not some small time blogger operation. They know how to source and validate someone's version of events.

You don't need to invent some wacky series of phone calls and multiple conversations that may or may not resemble a nightmare your wife went through, to make sense of this

YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool by zyxzevn in censorship

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow so why did brand for so long avoid the exact topic that the Illuminati have on their list?

What else is on the Illuminati list?

Why do they wait for brand to say something on their list before taking him out? If it's all for show they they wouldn't need to follow any procedure.

Why does the globalist Illuminati who rule every industry in the world give a shit about one douchebag's opinion about the pharmaceutical industry

Which big pharma anyway. There are multiple large pharma corporate networks across russia, China, the west in general, just USA domestic, just EU domestic etc. Why would they care about an ex heroin addict on youtube complaining about Johnson& Johnson or whatever

Nothing about your imaginary Illuminati makes sense. How come your brain doesn't let you notice that none of this makes sense? Don't you experience the mental brick wall, when your brain stops allowing you from recognising how little of the conspiracy shit makes any sense

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Look it's very simple

You just have to use critical thinking

That's what you said when you were relaying a story narrative of events.

You imagined conversations between the journalists and sources for this story

You imagined a conversation between the journalists and brand

You imagined a conversation between brand and his lawyer

There was this whole series of events, which led you to conclude, that you didn't trust the reporting in this case.

Now I'm just asking you for your evidence that any of those events happened. Because I think you imagined it all and you're using it to inform your world view. So what's your evidence for any of that taking place here

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

is most certainly not the result of my imagination

Excellent; in that case please share the evidence

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That response doesn't make any sense

Okay sure let me clarify

Starting from the word "First" which is three lines down.

Everything from then on, is the result of your imagination, with absolutely zero evidence

https://saidit.net/s/MediaAnalysis/comments/bil3/the_fall_of_russell_brand_is_no_victory_for_women/14291

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a whole lot of story for which you have zero evidence.

I have more than zero evidence.

Yours is coming from your imagination.

Mine is coming from a source with a track records and a corrections department and a postal address....

Weighing the credibility, between your paranoid imagination, and the centuries of The Times doing basically zero of what you described, ....not looking good chief

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're simply incorrect about the terminology but putting that aside.

It's not really the case that anyone here is uncritically believing everything they read.

If I look at the newspaper front page. And it says "Wednesday" and I don't actively question the day of the week....am I uncritically just believing the paper? If it says that today is rainy and my shoes are wet - if I'm not actively challenging the newspaper in my mind, is it fair to say I'm just uncritically believing what I read?

We live in a world where reporters who make up stories, who make up rape stories about public figures, have consequences. You can bet on those consequences. If there's a reporter who routinely lies, you can hang your hat on there being consequences for those lies, like a lawsuit or whatever.

I believe when I read "Wednesday" and I believe the weather because of a preponderance of data points that are in alignment. Likewise when the times and dispatches put on this kind of piece, you can bet that, if they're making something up, there will be consequences for them.

UKRAINE CHILD ORGAN TRAFFICKING NETWORK USED CHARITY FRONT CALLED 'HEART OF LOVE' PER ARRESTED TRAFFICKER by Oyveygoyim in WorldNews

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know what point you're trying to make. You linked to a story about a dude who was caught at the border with someone else's baby and now he's locked up. That's a good outcome and I hope the kid and family are being helped. What else do you want here?

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why would I do searches to validate the things you suggest? If you suggest there's a spaghetti monster in orbit of mars am I supposed to go out and try to prove or disprove it?

Anyway, because you linked to social media instead of a proper source, I did go ahead and do that googling, and I found this too

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/197530/culture-media-and-sport-committee-chair-writes-to-broadcasters-and-tiktok-over-russell-brand-allegations-and-investigations/

I totally agree with you, assuming that is a true copy of the letter to rumble which you linked to.

The UK government would be totally overstepping their bounds, by sending this - honestly creepy and horrible - letter to rumble.

In this case, it's a committee of MPs, so not the actual government, but a group of representatives who meet to consider advice to the government about culture media and sports

You can see more about them here

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/culture-media-and-sport-committee/

It's not the government but a group of reps who meet and put together advice. So, sure, close enough.

It's a horrible letter and a fantastic response from rumble for their PR.

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh so why did you say it then

Were you just talking out your ass

apparently sent out letters

Any evidence ? Besides the contents of your rectum?

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude I don't think, anyone at saidit who has read my posts before, is thinking "wow this guy just believes things without good evidence"

Feel free to point to something I believed without good evidence. I would welcome you to do that. I have pretty good evidence that Brand is a rapey sex creep.

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Joe told me he saw Ron climbing the fence

That's not hearsay; Jon literally saw it with his own eyes.

If you said "Jon told me that Ron said Ron had climbed the fence" then it's hearsay because Jon is repeating what he heard.

You're wrong. If Jon says "I saw Ron climbing", then that's evidence that Ron done did it.

If Jon is talking to a reporter who writes up the story, "on a sunny morning in May I met with Jon, who told me over coffee about when he saw Ron climb the fence"....and I am sat at home, reading the story in the paper....then I have evidence and I have first hand testimony, that Ron climbed the fence

Edit, sorry, no I dont

I would have second hand testimony in that case

If I read a line in the newspaper that says "as Jon put down his coffee he turned to me and said 'i saw Ron climb the fence'" then I would have first hand testimony

But the version presented above would be second hand, unless the journalist takes care to preserve the exact wording.

So I guess I also have second hand testimony in this case, not only first, sorry

A second woman alleges that Brand assaulted her when he was 31 and she was 16 and still at school. She said he referred to her as “the child” during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship that lasted for about three months, and that Brand once “forced his penis down her throat”, making her choke. She says she tried to push him off and said she had to punch him in the stomach to make him stop.

Here, we have both first and second hand testimony

UKRAINE CHILD ORGAN TRAFFICKING NETWORK USED CHARITY FRONT CALLED 'HEART OF LOVE' PER ARRESTED TRAFFICKER by Oyveygoyim in WorldNews

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You linked a story about Ukraine catching and jailing the bad guys....

UKRAINE CHILD ORGAN TRAFFICKING NETWORK USED CHARITY FRONT CALLED 'HEART OF LOVE' PER ARRESTED TRAFFICKER by Oyveygoyim in WorldNews

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a reason that you had to link to a social media post about a blog post about a telegram post.

If you had linked straight to the telegram post, everyone would see right through it. So you had to disguise it with two orders of separation, to even try and hide how non-credible this is

https://saidit.net/s/Antiwar/comments/bin4/arrested_child_trafficker_admits_to_boarding/1426w

There is a war criminal kidnapping children in the world today! And he would do fucking anything to make you forget that

Arrested child trafficker admits to boarding school used as front for organ harvesting network in Ukraine by zyxzevn in Antiwar

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is ....not at all credible.

A Roma guy called Varodi, plus a Roma woman, were detained at the Ukraine/Slovakia border by Ukrainian border guard with an unrelated child.

Investigations with the mother revealed she had been paid and told the child would be adopted by an EU family.

This is a story about how ruzzia's brutal war of agression is splitting families.

Varodi was arrested by Ukrainian authorities and put in jail. While there, he has apparently gotten hold of a cell phone.

He's recording himself sitting in his cell, reeling off hours of conspiracy content for which he is the one and only source - his past involvement with a Roma school, some kind of organ trafficking ring, naming organisations which he says are trafficking kids.

It's just not credible. He's in jail for lying to a mother. He's not an honest man. Nobody else has verified any of the claims he's making whiling away the hours in his cell.

This is a story about how diligent Ukrainian law enforcement are managing to keep victim families together despite Putin and the Z people's genocide.

There is a war criminal kidnapping children and he would do fucking anything to make you forget that

I wonder why he was #metoo (Russell Brand) by Tom_Bombadil in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay I will

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Who told you the government were involved

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think it would be appropriate for me to ridicule you so I'll just politely say, sir, "firsthand testimony" is a legal and common vernacular phrase to refer to the testimony provided by a witness who was directly involved.

Just for example, if you watch a person on the TV news say "I was walking down the road last week and I saw a huge car crash" - you're getting first hand testimony of what happened. Even though you're experiencing it through TV or whatever. Because that's what 'first hand testimony' means.

When someone provides first hand testimony of events, that's evidence that the events happened.

We can weigh the evidence, assess it's credibility and whatnot, but it's absolutely true to say that we have firsthand testimony that Brand raped someone, and that testimony counts as evidence.

So, when you wrote this

You have literally no evidence

You were totally wrong, because first hand testimony is evidence. Even if you want to weigh or discount the evidence.

Were there any other terms or phrases I used that confused you, or that you want to ask about

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is English your first language?

I can go gentler on you, if not

I wonder why he was #metoo (Russell Brand) by Tom_Bombadil in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only place in this story overly affected by imaginary Jewishness is the inside of your head

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, he's not locked behind bars

Oh. But I thought you said, that you thought he had been found guilty and was now having to prove his innocence. It must be confusing for you to hold two contrasting views at once.

You have literally no evidence

First hand testimony is classed as evidence in every fucking human jurisdiction on earth you dipshit

Most people want to be ruled by siliconmorpheus in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't want to plan new roads

I don't want to supervise the school kids during lunch hour

I don't want to plan the national grain stockpile

I don't want to regulate wall street companies

I want public officials to do those things. What about you, op, do you want to do those things yourself, or would you rather be ruled?

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just like you don't have any proof that Russell Brand has ever raped anybody.

I have pretty good evidence.

guilty until proven innocent."

Lol

Am I jailing him? Did you think that perhaps u/site_sux works for his majesty's prisons service?

Well I don't work for them, so for me, the level of evidence is enough to believe his victims.

You'll notice that he isnt in jail right now, which must be strange and confusing for you, because apparently you believed that he is determined criminally guilty and has to now prove his innocence. It must be quite confusing for you to learn that criminal justice still works how you remember it used to, and we didn't make the switch to guilty-until-proven-innocent

New York Times tried to block a web crawler that was affiliated with the famous Internet Archive, a project whose easy-to-use comparisons of article versions has sometimes led to embarrassment for the newspaper. by PanzerDivision in Internet

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's no matter here on which their credibility is up for debate. They said that certain user agents may not crawl certain areas of their site.

You replied that you didn't believe them.

It IS moronic. Robots dot txt is a machine instruction. There is no sense in which credibility enters the argument. To claim that you don't believe their robots dot txt makes you sound like a retard.

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://archive.ph/mP8ff

Look if you can read the first few paragraphs and conclude that he only raped one person, then perhaps you should sit down with a wife, sister, mother or trusted female, if you have any, and ask them whether they agree.

I think forcing your dick into someone's mouth such that they have to get violent in order to get you off them - to me, that's a rape. Also anything he did with a 16 year old is rape where I live, fortunately for brand apparently not where he lives.

I don't really care that you dont believe he's a multiple rapist. It's a nuance and I really don't want to hear you argue it. Find a trusted woman and ask her whether or not that counts as rape, I really do not want to hear your thoughts on it

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's absolutely possible

Okay but you haven't seen any proof of this

just sat on it for eleven years,

Or that

were offering her healthy sums

Or that

Why are you layering so much of your imagination over a well reported story? Are you so unable to deal with the facts, that you're having to imagine new bells and whistles for this story

The FBI had so many paid informants at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, that they lost track of the number and had to perform a later audit to determine exactly how many "Confidential Human Sources" run by different FBI field offices were present that day. by Chipit in news

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey it was your decision to link evidence supporting Donald J Trump's crooked justice policy, not mine, you can't blame me for this one

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Solely on the facts that his rape victims said he raped them, plus his long history of shitty, addict and creep behavior

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you really contending the no woman has ever gone to a rape treatment center for any sexual encounter that could fall short of rape

What evidence have you seen that supports the conjecture that this is happening here? Nothing

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Uh huh so she went to a rape treatment center for fun, got treated for no reason, kept the paperwork as a memento of the fun day she had getting spatula'd and swabbed and splayed.

Sounds unlikely to be honest.

Nobody acting in good faith, thinks that women get rape treatment just for fun.

Edit

No wait sorry

You're saying it's more likely that a random woman went to a rape treatment for no reason

Compared to the likelihood of an admitted sex creep, an admitted sex addict, committing rape

You're saying the first is more likely than the second

That tells me you're completely off your rocker. You fucking lunatic. Look at the lengths you're dragging yourself to, just to avoid acknowledging that the admitted sex addict is probably also a rapist too

New York Times tried to block a web crawler that was affiliated with the famous Internet Archive, a project whose easy-to-use comparisons of article versions has sometimes led to embarrassment for the newspaper. by PanzerDivision in Internet

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They literally haven't made any statement on this topic that we have seen other than robots.txt

So you sound like a moron.

Do you believe that their robots.txt is probably a true statement? Are you going to tell me that you have low trust in a machine instruction. You sound stupid

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

complaining about clearly non-criminal conduct and consensual sex with Brand that they regretted late

One of his rape victims had medical paperwork for the rape treatment center, from the morning after he raped her.

right alongside

Sounds like you have a problem with the editors, then.

You seem to have a lot of problems here and zero of them are related to the fact that a dude in showbiz used his stature to rape women, including a 16 year old child

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay so let's say a dude rapes a woman today (like brand did)

Now the woman wants justice.

Is there any way she can get justice without invoking victim feminism or her "weak emotions"

It's kind of a stupid claim for you to make really. They're just rape victims being candid about what happened to them. Projections based on your fragile masculinity are entirely happening in your head. Feel free to show evidence how this is linked to your imagination of 'fourth wave' or organised feminism or whatever - because I think that's just happening in your head

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why is saying "that man raped me" called 'victim feminism'

Is there a way to say 'i was attacked by that man' without playing a victim card?

Let's say your sister tells you she has been raped. Can you think through how you'd advise her on next steps to take without turning her into a victim feminist?

It's a pretty dumb take when you think about it

The fall of Russell Brand is no victory for women by jet199 in MediaAnalysis

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need to ask whether this cultural shift has been in the best interests of women.

Nobody cares about your "victory" or your fake culture war bullshit.

This is about multiple rape victims having their say.

Nobody is trying to get "victory" over you dipshit culture mongs. This is just about some people saying 'he raped me".

Hey jet199 maybe idolising another YouTube conspiritard rapist is NOT A VICTORY FOR MEN.

Did you think about that

YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool by zyxzevn in censorship

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I recognise that man in the thumbnail - he's the rapist and kiddy fiddler we've been talking about

The FBI had so many paid informants at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, that they lost track of the number and had to perform a later audit to determine exactly how many "Confidential Human Sources" run by different FBI field offices were present that day. by Chipit in news

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

More evidence that crooked Donald J Trump's justice department had advance knowledge and let it happen.

Great link, chipit, thanks, always good to see more evidence against crooked Donald J Trump's justice department

I wonder why he was #metoo (Russell Brand) by Tom_Bombadil in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How did he manage to avoid stepping on the no-go topics for years and years?

Nothing about your imaginary Illuminati makes sense.

Alternative sources for the No Pronouns mod for Starfield by firebreathingbunny in Gaming

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol this is a game mod that censors something against your ideology dipshit

YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool by zyxzevn in censorship

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah because the problem here is with the media, and not the rapist

YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool by zyxzevn in censorship

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

His rape victim showed medical paperwork from the rape treatment they received the morning after he raped her.

He done did it

YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool by zyxzevn in censorship

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah the real problem here is youtube monetary policy and not the rape. Let's talk about 10 other topics so we don't have to acknowledge that he's a rapist

New York Times tried to block a web crawler that was affiliated with the famous Internet Archive, a project whose easy-to-use comparisons of article versions has sometimes led to embarrassment for the newspaper. by PanzerDivision in Internet

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trusting them with what exactly?

The only statement they've made, that we've seen, is the robots.txt link above. That's a pretty clear statement. Would you like to flesh out how exactly they might be lying within their robots.txt

Are you saying that somehow OP and the Intercept are more trustworthy? Than a technical document ? What

YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool by zyxzevn in censorship

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wrong. Strawman again. It's not stealing. If you're so sure it's stealing - then why don't you call the cops and make a police report? You might as well, right?

Edit - or I mean okay seriously now.

Totally serious.

Why don't you call the UK cops wherever Brand lives in Essex or London or whatever.

And just say "I'm calling because I heard about a person in your policing area who I think had some money stolen from them"

No one is going to get you in trouble because that's a legit reason for a police call.

Then you can talk to them about what you think happened and they will explain to you why it's not stealing

YouTube SHUT DOWN Russell Brand, DISABLES Monetization, BBC PULLS Shows As Brand Is WIPED From Med.. - Tim Pool by zyxzevn in censorship

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because YouTube, like every other private company, don't have to pay YouTubers if the contract isn't forcing them to

And if you don't like it, delete your shit off YouTube

Brand knew what he was doing when he signed up for the platform, knowing it was a good place to find viewers and build his brand. He took from YouTube's shine, from their userbase, and not the other way around. He was perfectly happy with the arrangement when he felt it was building a brand for himself. Only when he learned that YouTube aren't forced to stay in business with a rapist, suddenly it's a problem. Suddenly YouTube is the source of the world's problems and not rapist men in showbusiness

Give me a break

What a pathetic worm you are

You reason like a pathetic whiney snowflake baby

I wonder why he was #metoo (Russell Brand) by Tom_Bombadil in whatever

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow smart boy used Wikipedia well done big boy

Do you want a participation trophy

Completely fucking irrelevant to the fact that brand raped a woman, persued a 16 year old when he was a grown ass man, and creeped on every single woman he met, including admitting that he was a sex addict and a creep