The Head Covering for Women, Does it Apply to Us Today?

Questionable · 2020-07-08T07:08:50+00:00

If you look out your window. You may find that even the men are currently wearing head coverings.... This brings up many questions for the current state of both the united states and the rest of the world.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T07:04:27+00:00

Not everything is a debate. You don't need to insult me. This isn't even a conversation you were involved in. The reference for the sub was only to provide you context for the assumption that you might be the husband, as you were speaking on her behest . If you wish to discuss this further please do so in private messages. Good night.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T06:39:37+00:00

I asked a question of u/calmbluejay and her husband. You chose to speak for her in the s/BiblicalSubmission sub, where:

"This is a sub for Christian biblical male-female relationships. Here we discuss how men should be allowed to lead in a marriage and how women be his help mate."

Alright, and with that context you chose to:

"Honestly, I didn't read your entire post, just the first couple of sentences."

OK, and yet I am the one who:

"need to go back to school to substantiate your condescending 'I'm better than you' attitude with a shred of knowledge. "

Insulting to say the least. Well at least you got this right:

"Communication is not about just spewing out as much nonsense as you can."

Questionable · 2020-07-08T05:16:13+00:00

I don't know who ‘they’ are in this context, I don't know what "so do I" means in the earlier statement.
As for my response, it was a series of two question that you chose to ignore. That is provided that you are u/calmbluejay ‘s husband. But I don’t know if you are, because you have entered this conversation without introducing yourself as such. Without typing out your statements in full, and relying on short hand replies, I, as you, can add any context to them we wish. In this manner our words will cease to have meaning. We will only appear to be connecting with each other while filling in the narratives on both of our ends, without expressing actual meaning. What you are currently doing, in using a broken dialog. Such short hand is the bases for George Orwell's new speak. This is how the individual loses their identity and their abilities to express themselves.
I ask of you that you, use proper nouns and descriptive nouns. “they” when several parties are being discussed is not acceptable. LOL is not communication. “So do I” is not a sentence that holds inherent meaning, when the last sentence it is being replied to does not warrant such acknowledgment. And above all else. Please answer my questions when I ask them of you. Simply echoing back my own words to me, is the equivalent of saying “I know you are but what am I” Getting back to my questions, for your benefit, here is the context for my questions:

“The problem is that we've been taught by our church leaders that we're supposed to do whatever the government says and if there's a problem Jesus will take care of it for us.”

My questions were prefaced with a statement on the complexities of both religion and the united states government, sans the statement ‘with all that in mind.’ My questions are as follows:

So if the government under the control of Bill Gates and his religious eugenics ideologies deems it necessary that you take an experimental vaccine that edits your DNA rendering you no longer human, you submit?
OK, well, putting aside the fact that all words of religions doctrine have been written by man, can you or your husband explain to me why the main audience hall for the Pope, is shaped like that of a viper's head? https://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/11/17/the-dark-secrets-behind-the-popes-audience-hall-its-a-giant-reptilian/

Please see fit to explain to me your position on these matters, and how that it fits into your religious views.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T04:30:57+00:00

" If you're so upset by me sharing it, I'll delete it for your comfort."

You're not following me, not at all. I'm not here trying to get you to submit to any kinds of demands, only for you to understand what it is I am thinking and saying.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T04:27:43+00:00

"I honestly didn't think anyone would have skin thin enough to be upset by it."

It's called context. Here we have a clip, out of context, that is put into forum, where my only hint at it's context is a single word s/funny that can be measured in millimeters. Oh and it's title. Where as the video instructs people on how to dismiss their friends and relatives for subversive thinking. Do you actually think this has something to do with my 'thin skin' and not say, my opposition to large tech companies controlling peoples world view, and censoring dialog?

"If you could explain why or how, I'd agree with you but I don't"

My only viewing of Colbert as of now is this. What am I to think of him? I just watched a mouth piece for censorship using soft tones to outright dismiss information.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T04:13:42+00:00

I don't know what he's doing. I don't know why you posted this link. I can only take his statements at face value, because no rational human being injects parody into a topic of this nature. Sorry, didn't realize I was viewing a s/funny post. But I do now see Corbett as a joke, and a man who values money above all else, just like Alex Jones does.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T04:09:06+00:00

He's instructing people to be just as dismissive, to not click the link provided, and to ensure that they change the mind of the person who provided the link none the less. You see any critical thinking in that?

Questionable · 2020-07-08T03:57:01+00:00

Um. This counter argument is just as harmful. Both of them are designed to shut down critical thinking. Why not suggest clicking the link and assessing the information on your own? This literally sounds like controlled opposition.

Here is one of the scary links that was featured in that video. https://www.instagram.com/p/B_q1jv_nmiX/

Questionable · 2020-07-08T03:30:13+00:00

"So do I" Is not a logical reply to the entire comment. Or is it that you??? As for doing as your government tells you, there are at least six deep states that exist within the government and that's just surface level. Where as there are thirty three thousand denominations and independent views of Christianity and Jesus. So if the government under the control of Bill Gates and his religious eugenics ideologies deems it necessary that you take an experimental vaccine that edits your DNA rendering you no longer human, you submit? OK, well, putting aside the fact that all words of religions doctrine have been written by man, can you or your husband explain to me why the main audience hall for the Pope, is shaped like that of a viper's head?

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/11/17/the-dark-secrets-behind-the-popes-audience-hall-its-a-giant-reptilian/

Questionable · 2020-07-08T03:11:26+00:00

Either you quoted the wrong section, or I am not following your logic.

Edit: In addition, I see no reason for you to point out that you are laughing at me, nor to write it out in the short hand of "LOL". Such sloppy grammar does not promote rational thought, or convey any meaning.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T02:06:43+00:00

"They were torn down on Sunday by Nailsea resident Shane Jones, who said he was "disgusted" and "shocked"."

"disgusted and shocked", really? Not say, amused and humored? Not an ounce of tolerance in this person. Can only imagine Shane Jones' daily plight of simply making breakfast in the morning. Hours of self exploration ending in being balled up in the corner shrieking at his cheerios for not self applying milk.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T01:52:21+00:00

Any flag that the government chooses to fly must be displayed at a lower level to that of it's own. Or equal level on neutral grounds to a foreign government. As for movements, or religious flags. These are not things for a government body to encourage or discourage, to take on as an aspect of it's identity.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T01:42:29+00:00

All modern societies were built on the teachings of Sigmund Freud. Beliefs that are simply a means of viewing the world through his eyes. I assure you that you were not born thinking of yourself as an ego, or having an id or a super ego. These were things you learned, things that those in control built into our society as the 'correct' way to view your world.
With that in mind, I assure you that everything you just said is wrong. Your comment reads like that of a person who has recently gone through a great loss and is trying to make sense of it by viewing these events through rights and wrongs, self visualized heroism versus a villain. The generalizations you have implemented to view the world, everyone in it, your past and future may help you to ease your pain, but it will not help you to think your way through problems in the future, only to hide from them. You must learn to think your way through the complexities of life, to categorize the things in your life into more than dual categories. To shape your own mind by questioning everything.
This is not an external struggle you are dealing with, this is an internal one. Though I assure you, that it is caused by someone having a plan for the future, your future, and it has nothing to do with love. And they view your life as the one without purpose.
Don't fall for this fallacy, this simple view of the world they have given you. This false world. You must see it all, you must aspire to understand everything and how it's all connected together. As one doge equals one doge, love is love. Never forget that.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T01:06:44+00:00

This isn't about religion, this is about the communities that their religion supports, and silencing them. As an person that does not support organized religion myself, I encourage all those who are members of any congregation to openly oppose this suppression of your beliefs. The suppression of your right to organize, and your freedom of speech. To get together, and have open dialog of both the lock downs, and the privately financed riots.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T00:57:19+00:00

Feel free to either include a submission statement in the comments, or include it in your title so that we can better gauge the purpose of your link.

Questionable · 2020-07-08T00:54:09+00:00

Feel free to wear your mask on your head like a hat in protest.

Questionable · 2020-07-07T23:17:57+00:00

Master bedroom implies home ownership. This is to move people towards no longer seeing themselves as masters of their own properties. To debase themselves from their identities.

Questionable · 2020-07-07T07:26:18+00:00

It's interesting how they keep calling her a "madam". I prefer the term "child sex trafficker".

Questionable · 2020-07-07T03:50:09+00:00

Disco Ball.

Questionable · 2020-07-04T05:51:18+00:00

These actions constitute a conspiracy to harm the president of the unites states via mass homicide. I prefer not to cross post my own links. So if anyone out there cares to post this to s/conspiracy/ . Feel free to do so.

Questionable · 2020-07-02T20:08:32+00:00

My guess is that their crimes were judged using managerial control methods weighing time restraints versus importance. Or to say, the greater the number of orders for organs, the higher the penalty for their crimes became. This is of course just paper work, similar to how the banking system is a front for slavery, the criminal justice system in China is a cover story for the farming of human flesh.

Questionable · 2020-07-02T20:01:15+00:00

So it's your claim that Tucker Carlson, who is paid to host an editorial show, is a shill? Under such broad definitions who isn't a shill? That question isn't rhetorical by the way.

As for researching Tucker. How about I simply judge his statement on their own merit and importance? Which to my current situation are both marginal and non existent.

Questionable · 2020-07-02T19:31:18+00:00

Oh no. It's "mass hysteria", people are being murdered in the streets, children sacrificed to moloch, world wide oppression and control of the masses through technology and subversion. And all because u/teelo posted a pokemon joke. Aeeieee! No!... Why have you done this teelo?

Questionable · 2020-07-02T19:19:41+00:00

Hello Yamyam. Allow me to introduce myself. I am 'Questionable'. As for your introduction, you seem to be yelling into the void.

Questionable · 2020-07-02T05:13:23+00:00

Quote in case of twitter censorship: "China began allowing organ removal from executed prisoners in 1984. Over the past 36 years this practice has expanded to the point that the CCP are now running an international industry extracting organs, tissue and collagen from human farms. #opDeathEaters"

Questionable · 2020-07-02T05:01:51+00:00

Groups such as XXchromosome on reddit should be set to private, exempt from front page promotion or considerations. A Group that other subs may link to to help people join their group, but not seen on the front page unless you are a member. These are not groups that should be profited off of. People go into subs such as those to discuss personal experiences, topics such as rape and abortion. People that need help and support, and not to be thrust out into the spot light of internet fame, throw away accounts or otherwise. Your sub on the other, invites debate. Is looking to change things, and can not benefit from privacy or exclusion. Excluding debate will only turn the sub into an echo chamber of closed off ideals. You're thinking will become disconnected from those around you. And over time, you may become that which you despise. Right essays right manifestos, and publish them to your sub. But above all else, debate those you appose. Creating a healthy dialog for political discourse does not happen behind closed doors. Privates groups are for support and personal change, public groups are for debate and public change.

Questionable · 2020-07-02T02:36:19+00:00

That doesn't mean anything.

Questionable · 2020-06-29T20:16:17+00:00

Right. You seem to be implying that constructing a narrative in a comic, somehow generates biased left wing propaganda?

"Incorporating countless ideas"

Having trouble counting to 1 are we? OK. Tell me the difference between these two concepts and I will ignore you.

"People don't believe right wing media as factual, due to preformed bias of their party"

"left wing media is corrupt, and controls the narrative"

Hint: The first one, from your comic, points a finger at a white man wearing a tee shirt, the second one points a finger at those in control of the flow of information, and money. Oops, I guess, I implied it was you pushing left wing propaganda.

Questionable · 2020-06-29T19:55:20+00:00

You don't seem to realize that you are so invented in your defeatist attitude , that you are actively petitioning against someone that shares your own opinion.

Then we can all go back to looking at our phones and jacking off.

You do that pall, you go 'jack off'

Questionable · 2020-06-29T19:47:28+00:00

Congratulations! Now just another sixty nine years, three hundred and sixty four more days to go!

Questionable · 2020-06-29T19:42:29+00:00

A more fitting title would be "Consume Left Wing Corporate Controlled Media". Now if only there was a way to incorporate the take over of the leftest by the Democratic National Committee and the banking interests in that cartoon, and we would have a complete narrative.

Questionable · 2020-06-29T19:19:09+00:00

Right, but taking a flu vaccine for the wrong strain will make you more susceptible to the other strains. And covid-19. And increase your chances of death.

Questionable · 2020-06-29T19:09:06+00:00

Yes, give up submit. Tell others to do the same.

Questionable · 2020-06-29T19:08:06+00:00

OH sorry, I thought I was replying in this Gangster rap thread. My bad.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T18:37:40+00:00

"the Left long ago abandoned liberalism and is now acting fascist. "

Wow, you were actually capable of typing that out. Now just keep doing that for another sixty or seventy years, and your words will continue to have meaning.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T18:16:45+00:00

Waffling is waffling, to add 'left' to the word, only skews it to make it appear as though only liberals waffle on an issue. In conclusion, it's best to call someone a waffle if they are wavering on their core ideals, without denoting their affiliation.

Edit: In addition, if your intention is to confuse leftwaffle with Luftwaffle, Lets just fucking not shall we. The English dialect is debased enough already without adding additional layers to this madness. Aspire to be civilized shall we?

Questionable · 2020-06-28T18:00:44+00:00

The constitution of the united states was written with neutral dialect, that favors no one. Unless you can cite an example where such language in governance is detrimental to the people, your simple inversion of the argument doesn't stand up. As a side note, such distortions of logic and words are how corporations and corrupt governments accomplish their goals in plain sight.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T17:51:47+00:00

Isn't 'nothing happening' a positive outcome and proof that someone in power cares? Negating the power of a multi trillion dollars investment group isn't as easy as putting someone's head on a pike in a town square. But it is something that can be done. Provided you don't fold like your grandma's knees, and submit to eventuality like this guy does. Oh, sorry, I think I just linked you to your own post. On accident.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T07:20:40+00:00

The exact opposite actually. It means they can now favor minorities even more than Affirmative Action already does, and discriminate openly against whites.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T05:37:17+00:00

Was this article translated from another language?

Questionable · 2020-06-28T05:31:26+00:00

That's not how to be happy, that's how to fool yourself and create cognitive dissonance. Happiness is less important that being healthy, sound of mind, and existing in reality. Disconnecting yourself from reality will only lead to a heightened potential for self harm.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T04:50:14+00:00

Right. But leaking the fact that you have authorized the use of force may cause the Chinese forces apprehension. Either way, military incursions over borders should be met with force, and not by feeding your troops into a meat grinder of hostile forces using bladed and blunt weapons.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T04:05:57+00:00

So the reaction to knowing this is caused by embedded politicians is to submit? And not say double down, and go full red ticket in order to vote out the cause of the problem? I mean, the reaction seems so obvious, my only concern is that it's what predictive AI from the Blackrock group want us to do.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T03:32:16+00:00

DEX decentralized exchanges are where it's at. Anything else on the financial side should be for Fiat portals.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T03:10:21+00:00

I don't understand what the point of any of that was. The article, these people, the money involved. None of it. I like to believe people should live by their ideals, but I don't understand what ideals these people have. They are very fixated on mundane tasks and foods. It's as though they are going through the motion of living in a community, without understanding what it mean's to have a community.

Questionable · 2020-06-28T00:55:59+00:00

Or I could simply wait for a death announcement. In no way is this a time sensitive even for me.

Questionable · 2020-06-27T23:05:18+00:00

I make this mistake often. That being said, after looking up both words, I now know that bated breath does not mean what I thought it did.

Questionable · 2020-06-27T23:04:12+00:00

Did you click on the leading question to watch to find out more? Alright, now you've learned some inflammatory 'facts' setting off and endorphin cycle in your mind, and someone else is getting paid add revenue for you clicking on the baited titled. I'm sorry, I'm making some rough guesses here, because I don't watch trash with click bait titles.

Questionable · 2020-06-27T20:37:55+00:00

But you have to ask yourself, which is more stable? Fiat based and created through debt, or Fiat based and created by nothing? Wouldn't that system me more favorable to a government controlled currency and not a private bank such as the Federal Reserve? Of course this only makes sense if an actual take over of the Federal Reserve took place as many suspect is happening.

As for derivatives, they should have never been allowed, they debase institutions and devalue monetary systems.

Questionable · 2020-06-27T20:25:16+00:00

This is the only source so far, can't find any of this 'social media rumors' this articles is reporting on.

Questionable · 2020-06-27T08:32:12+00:00

To the best of my knowledge there was none. Hopefully it has alerted some of the more honest members of government to push back against his influence.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T19:56:23+00:00

1998 . Wow that set looks like it came right out of the 80's. A rather painful set to look at. Music is fine, just don't listen to it with that tab open.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T19:50:38+00:00

https://www.christianpost.com/news/doj-overseeing-500-investigations-into-riots-antifa-protests-ag-barr-says.html

Questionable · 2020-06-26T19:48:46+00:00

Due to the date of this article, I most likely should have posted it to conspiracy.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T19:43:08+00:00

Hmm... Alright, now that you've fully fleshed out that quagmire. May I ask you, what do you believe is happening in Israel with Netanyahu's corruption trial, and do the people support the current Israeli government.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T19:32:34+00:00

Not sure of the politics involved, but it is my belief that true leadership shouldn't care about their future career. If the PM believes his actions are in his countries best interest, then that is the right decision to make. After all, the current rules of engagement were designed to prevent blood shed. This clearly is not working, and China is going to take full advantage of this.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T10:53:26+00:00

You can say that again!... And it still won't make any sense. Just so you are aware, you compared Hitler to three different conceptual factions, and called one of them a red herring, and made no definitive statement about any of them. Red herring to who? why do they say that? when do they say this?

Questionable · 2020-06-26T10:26:33+00:00

Without checking the links, I can tell you that your main submission is a bit out dated. The new orders for Indian troops as of the 21st is for them to engage Chinese troops with their arsenal and to fire at will. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/indian-troops-given-fire-will-orders-against-chinese-troops-if-threatened-enraging

Questionable · 2020-06-26T09:55:13+00:00

共匪

Strange both google and mdbg.net show it phonetically as "gòngfěi", but for some reason, google then translates that to 'gangster'. But if you break it up, both sites give you 'total bandit.'

Questionable · 2020-06-26T04:41:23+00:00

https://giphy.com/gifs/rickandmorty-adult-swim-rick-and-morty-l41lI4bYmcsPJX9Go

Questionable · 2020-06-26T04:19:09+00:00

michael jackson owned half of sony/atv before he died, The value of sony around that time was approximately 2 billion dollars and Michael owned half 1 billion. This is a 10 part series documentary. Part 2 HERE.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T04:12:27+00:00

"Totally something someone who's definitely not mad will do."

You actually think that only people who hate you take an interest in you? You do realize that looking at your submissions is a way to get to know you? To understand you better?
that's down vote thinking. And there is no down vote here at saidit.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T04:05:19+00:00

"It's Soros. And I thought you didn't care to find out?"

You are right. I didn't care to find out. But your antagonizing bating statement prompted a response. And you know that.

"How sad to be so incurious."

Now close the thesaurus tab before someone becomes unconcerned for the merits of tangible existence, and I deem it necessary to exit out of my reality!

Questionable · 2020-06-26T03:48:19+00:00

"How is evidence "spam"?"

When it's a disconnect cold intro, that's unrelated to what it's being replied too, then followed up with, the statement of "also" as though it's an extension of a statement. Which it wasn't. That wasn't 'evidence' they were unrelated poll results, that you pasted as a reply, to an accusation of BLM being a group of anarchists.

"It's Soros. And I thought you didn't care to find out?"

Your right, it is Soros. So which is the dog whistle, Soro, or Soros? Again, feel free to enlightenment me on which one of those words is a dog whistle, and to whom it was aimed. And more importantly, how it was a dog whistle in the first place.

As for that "100 Million Victims of Communism" thread that you are engaged in, I'm not sure if the word 'pedantic' is best used in a self referential manner, in that instance. As for the rest of it.... Are you sure you and everyone in that thread aren't just rogue A.I? Because, every statement is so disconnect from each other it's maddening.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T02:57:12+00:00

"How sad to be so incurious."

Right, please enlighten me as to what soro is a dog whistle for. Look, I searched, but I didn't find anything. Am I sending this dog whistle to you? Because it's just me and you in this thread, so is that what I am being accused of doing?

"It's pretty obvious to anyone with mediocre reading skills that I'm saying Americans are progressive on the major issues, and thus OP shouldn't be surprised by this outcome."

OP wasn't surprised by this outcome. Nobody was, she's the incumbent.

this statement from the-unflattering-6:

"No they don't. While its true that it's very difficult to get people off of entitlement programs, that's wholly different from the stunts leftists pull every day - several times a day - right now. These people are unhinged and poll after poll confirms that they are totally at odds with what Americans want. They don't want to defund the police, topple statues, burn down churches - in other words, total anarchy. "

received a reply of this one:

"Also, most Americans support Black Lives Matter. 60% of white people support BLM. And again, I'm talking about important shit, not old statues to traitors."

Plus a huge block of spam. somehow equates to this statement:

"...Americans are progressive on the major issues, and thus OP shouldn't be surprised by this outcome."

Are you sure it's reading skills I need? And not say, mind reading skills?

Questionable · 2020-06-26T02:11:46+00:00

"1) It's Soros, not "Soro". Nice dogwhistling, though."

I have no idea what that means, and I don't care.

" Because if your argument is that Americans aren't progressive"

I don't think you understand, I don't have an argument. I'm just trying to figure out what it is you are saying. That question wasn't an argument you needed to debate, or argue against. It was simply a play by play narrative, of your dialog.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Questionable · 2020-06-26T01:42:11+00:00

It's just click bate. Click bate I have no interest in. Now what I do find interesting is the characters "共匪". Now why on earth did you post the Chinese characters for 'gangster' in your reply?

Questionable · 2020-06-26T01:28:38+00:00

"Again, I'm sorry if these numbers hurt your feelings."

I... I can't even comprehend you. Look, you are using a possibly objective polls, based on subjective opinions, to justify your subjective statement that American's support The George Soro's backed BLM movement in response to statements that they are an anarchist group. Where as the linked poll pushes the subjective agenda that most people are liberal, while self defining what it means to be liberal. To back the statement that Ocasio Cortez crushed her rival that was... Also a democrat in a primary? And for some reason you are fixated on my feelings? Let me know if you find fault with any of those statements.

Questionable · 2020-06-26T00:45:45+00:00

You clearly do not understand how push poles work, or how the manipulation of data takes place. Take this for example:

"82 percent of Americans think wealthy people have too much power and influence in Washington"

That's the outcome of the poll but what was the question asked? And which demographics of Americans were asked? And as a statement on it's own, what does it even mean? I can use that assertion against your best interest, though simple naming schemes. Say something catchy like the 'patriot act' or 'net neutrality'. they can even implement private militias through campaigns of de-funding the police. Those aren't facts, those are data points and telemetry weaponized for the personal gains of the rich.

Questionable · 2020-06-25T19:46:34+00:00

I'm sorry that I hurt your feelings.

What? You do understand this is text right? You have no ability to judge emotions or feelings of others through the internet.

"This triggered you for some reason and left you unable to respond to these objective facts."

Please look into the differences between subjective statements and objective facts. Poll results are not objective facts. As an online discussion, this is the limit of my ability to help you.

Questionable · 2020-06-25T19:38:52+00:00

Responding to the only text that you wrote. No sane person supports looting murderous rioters. As for the rest of your submission, what does it prove, that you know how to copy paste?

"And again, I'm talking about important shit, not old statues to traitors."

No, you're not talking about anything. You literally stated no objective facts, and have presented no argument of any kind, and just spammed push pole results with no relevance. There isn't even an introductory statement as to what you could be attempting to present to us.

Here is the sum of your statement in this thread, minus the cut and paste:

Maybe it's because "progressive" politicians actually agree with Americans on all the important issues. [And I mean important shit, not women ghostbusters or whatever you incels are complaining about these days.] Also, most Americans support Black Lives Matter. 60% of white people support BLM. And again, I'm talking about important shit, not old statues to traitors.

How do you function? How do you even manage to put on your own shoes? For the record, you are not progressive. You don't even understand what that word means. Or even what the word Incel means.

"The first online community to use the term "incel" was started in 1993 when a Canadian university student known only by her first name, Alana, created a website in order to discuss her sexual inactivity with others. The website, titled "Alana's Involuntary Celibacy Project", was used by people of all genders to share their thoughts and experiences."

For the love of your own sanity. Think things out fully, not in sound bites. Type out full sentences paragraphs and thoughts, and not through quips taken from others, and stop using mental short hand in your writings, you vicious syrup covered potato waffle.

Questionable · 2020-06-25T19:10:39+00:00

It would seem the Babylonbee has now surpassed the onion on actual comical content. Most of the onions content over the last 2 months seem to incite violence, such as their George Floyd piece on 'knee injuries', which was both disrespectful and disturbing.

Questionable · 2020-06-25T10:23:25+00:00

Nothing has changed. It's just another narrative being spun to control the conversation. I personally hadn't even heard of the importance of this primary until today after it had happened. And yet it was made to sound as though it's this huge thing that has been playing out for some time. It's not. It never was, and there is no reason to consider it now, or ever again.

Questionable · 2020-06-25T04:52:15+00:00

u/EndlessSunflowers It's hard for me to understand someone such as yourself. You simply radiate your hate and disdain for others. I'm sorry, but that's all I get out of your jumble of words you believe express meaning. Until you learn to express yourself better, you are best ignored.

Questionable · 2020-06-24T22:04:41+00:00

You care to point us to this "white libertarian gangster rap video" that you are clearly alluding to?

Questionable · 2020-06-22T06:22:59+00:00

That's what I'm getting out of this.

Questionable · 2020-06-22T06:21:23+00:00

Amazing.

Questionable · 2020-06-18T06:38:45+00:00

I will concede that you have articulated your points clearly, when it comes to the point of using 'bless you' in short hand. Though I believe this promotes sloppy thinking. I believe that people should aspire to fully flesh out their words both in thought, and in communicating with others. It not only helps people to understand us, but for us to better understand our own thoughts.

Questionable · 2020-06-18T06:27:24+00:00

I'll take that as a yes. You are a person who has granted yourself the title of Jesus. Which is what you did when you named your online persona. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯