Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've linked to the data. You've not refuted that data.

"LOL" is not a refutation.

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You've never done to me.

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just so we're clear here: By "hoax" you mean the current pandemic that's literally everywhere in the world, barring the bottom of the Mariana Trench.

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The content linked to the data. Your "bad faith" deflection doesn't pass muster, because the content is true and evidenced.

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But the OP is clearly wrong that vaccines would have saved them.

The vaccines are very effective at keeping CoVID infections mild or asymptomatic. Since there's no 70 year olds on active duty, of would stop nearly all the deaths from CoVID in police.

Likely most of them happened to test positive while suffering from cardiac arrest.

Generally also while intubated in an ICU because of CoVID infection.

Most CoVID deaths aren't sudden. You get a decline over a few days.

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah the cockwomble in question put that there just before deleting the comment and banning me.

But he uses the accusation "sealioning" to shut down any debate regarding his Glavset shilling. And he calls other people shills and liars to deflect from his shilling and lying.

I think if you look at my post, it's high on the POD. The police have had several hundred deaths by CoVID in the line of duty, and that's relevant to the post, and supported by my links.

There's no questions, so it's not sealioning. (Although the mod of that forum has accused my of sealioning in other comments in which I asked no questions, demonstrating I think, that he's not concerned about sealioning, but by shutting down evidence-based discussion).

So it even obeys to those retrofitted rules: it's not spam, it's not sealioning, it's anti-shilling, by countering the post, I'm not a bot, and you can see it's not a lie because I link to the data.

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hear hear!

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for your openness to debate. I appreciate it.

Cops get coughed on, get spat on, get blood on them, grapple with people. They've been dying much more than other people of CoVID, and their database honours them as deaths in the line of duty.

I can understand why.

/s/Passports seems to be breaking rule 4a) "Mods cannot remove user comments that are both in good faith and on-topic." by ActuallyNot in SaidIt

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The OP is clearly shilling in BAD faith.

I'm not shilling, it's not in bad faith, and I provided a link to my data, even without being prompted.

Things you have never done even when asked.

Which is how we know I tell the truth and you shill lies.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The CoVID hoax?

The one in which every country except North Korea has faked strain on the medical system, especially intubation in intensive care?

And have faked even more strain on medical professionals, since of who I personally know?

Every single country?

Is that the hoax I'd have to be low IQ to Venice in?

Atheist enraged because her christian neighbors tried to be friendly and invite her/him/it to social events by metafilter_sucks in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have no trouble believing it.

Black and Latino students did worse in schools with ‘diversity officers’: study by jet199 in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That is a lie.

I'm sometimes mistaken, but I very rarely lie. What is the basis of this accusation?

IQ is the most accurate predictor of lifetime success.

Can you point me to the work on this? I'd be interested in the definition of "lifetime success" and how IQ is separated from confounders such as affluence.

LifeSite News by [deleted] in ShitpostNews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm still on Earth.

What's the COVID misinformation from months back that is now being accepted on the planet Risperdal?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You think correcting bad mathematics that comes with racist propaganda is "anti-white hate" and "black raping apologetics"?

Relax, it's merely anti bad math, and irritation at mouth-breather racists with breeding so pure that their family tree doesn't have branches.

Black and Latino students did worse in schools with ‘diversity officers’: study by jet199 in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure.

Social class is also a network. You build professional contacts from the people at your school who are your group, and later with the parents of other children who can afford a similar amount as you to send their kids to the same school.

And small but significant things about the class of your friends makes movement out of that class difficult. At a point in my life I was looking for work in a city I'd arrived in with not a lot, but I crashed with an old university mate and his family. Because he was professional class, that influenced the type of jobs I could get, simply because I showed up to interviews in one if his suits.

Black and Latino students did worse in schools with ‘diversity officers’: study by jet199 in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i <- I think you dropped this.

Black and Latino students did worse in schools with ‘diversity officers’: study by jet199 in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not related to the research. It would not appear in a scientific publication, because you have to use the space to get across your methods and findings.

But also it's fucking embarrassing if you are used to reading scholarly research:

It's alienating for some readers, it's confirming for some readers. It's wishy-washy in the sense that it's not well defined.

Low signal to noise emotional language that has no place in describing a piece of research.

That's how we "feel" safe by jet199 in funny

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The right has turned it into an anti-trans rights thing though.

The girl was the victim of relationship violence, not an instance of transexual rape.

The rapist had been in a sexual relationship with the victim, and they'd had two consensual sexual encounters in the school bathroom. The girl chose to meet him in the bathroom, but intended to talk. The boy expected sex, didn't take no for an answer and sexually assaulted her.

The rapist was wearing a skirt, but that didn't authorize him to use the girl's bathroom. The bathroom policies that the victim's father was protesting didn't take effect for more than two months after the assault.

My sympathies are with the girl, and I'm in no way condoning rape. But it was nothing to do with transgenders being able to access the girl's bathroom.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gop-virginia-loudoun-county-bathroom-assault-transgender_n_61784469e4b093143210f8d6

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/opinion/loudoun-county-trans.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/in-case-at-center-of-political-firestorm-judge-finds-teen-committed-sexual-assault-in-virginia-school-bathroom/2021/10/25/42c037da-35cc-11ec-8be3-e14aaacfa8ac_story.html

Black and Latino students did worse in schools with ‘diversity officers’: study by jet199 in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is well known that personal responsibility is one of the main factors which lead to success.

Is it?

In the USA the main single factor for a successful career is rich parents.

See perhaps HOW MUCH DOES CHILDHOOD POVERTY AFFECT THE LIFE CHANCES OF CHILDREN?*

0r

Rags to Rags: Poverty and Mobility in the United States

To what extent is this modified by "personal responsibility"?

Black and Latino students did worse in schools with ‘diversity officers’: study by jet199 in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I would differentiate a scientific study, by scientists, and a propaganda piece by a right wing thing tank.

A right wing think tank could do a scientific study, but it would be published in a scientific journal, and be subject to peer review.

And it wouldn't start "Chief diversity officers (CDOs), who typically advance a leftist agenda, ..." if it's going to be published in any scholarly journal of standing.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Worse still, black sexual abuse and harassment, along with rape, are even more extreme and disproportionate.

I'm not aware of that. Can you show me the data?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Personal anecdote then. I'm not convinced. Or even swayed.

The racial bais in the legal system doesn't just have anecdotal evidence. Your claims of "anti-white ideological propaganda fueling anti-white violence and crime" is unsupported.

The COVID Cult by zyxzevn in NoNewNormal

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Occasionally in the world there's a pandemic. With the increased population there's increased opportunity for aggressive strains of infectious diseases to emerge.

There was quite a dangerous one in 2019-2020. Some people are not vaccinated so face risk from some variants still in late 2021.

None of this is magical. It's just the biology of epidemiology in a world of 8 billion people.

You seem to think a list by some cockwomble about why the facts of the recent pandemic should be treated as false demands some sort of response. There's no science there. What response is needed?

Are you expecting some comment about the geopolitics of glavset misinformation designed to damage the people and economies of the west?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've gone back and look, and there's none.

The COVID Cult by zyxzevn in NoNewNormal

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Irrational Belief that a Version of the Flu with no or mild symptoms in most people is a thread to humanity"

I don't think it's a threat to humanity. But it's killed 5,000,000.

And done long term damage to many more.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is there some well evidenced point I'm avoiding?

CDC allows hospitals to classify dead vaxxed people as “unvaccinated” | Principia Scientific Intl. by JasonCarswell in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not trying to deflect. I made a sound argument with references.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

'12 scamers make 65% of the anti-vax misinformation on social media'

That's true. I link the paper. Read it. It's well researched.

The biggest killer by far of police in the line of duty is COVID-19. Vaccines would have saved most of those 250 deaths this year so far, and some of the later of the 248 deaths last year.

That's also true. I link to the data from the police death in the line of duty reports. Read them.

Is bad math. The ratio of population has the same effect of black on white crime as it does on white on black crime.

That's true too. A small population of one group affects the crimes committed by them and the crimes perpetrated on them by the same ratio.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe you know what he's talking about. (if anything)

Which vaccine is poisonous and what is the poison?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you point me to an instance?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

say what dumb dumb?

"My profits trump your facts." doesn't quite hold because you don't have facts either.

Black and Latino students did worse in schools with ‘diversity officers’: study by jet199 in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps districts create CDO positions because they have larger achievement gaps that they wish to remedy.

That was my first question. Well my second. (See below the line)

To address this concern, it is possible to examine the trend in achievement gaps, over time, rather than the static magnitude of those gaps, to see if districts with CDOs are making progress to close those gaps.

Unfortunately that too is not independent. Racial Socioeconomic Inequality Predicts Growing Racial Academic Inequality.

To see if a CDO improves the performance of the blacks and latinos you have to make a fair effort to estimate how they would have done without the CDO. Assuming that they would have done the same as schools without a CDO is accepted by the paper to be questionable. Assuming instead that the relative trend in performance would be the same, as they have done, is also questionable.


But come on:

1) Chief diversity officers (CDOs), who typically advance a leftist agenda, are spreading beyond college campuses and becoming more common in K–12 districts.

Really? You're going to make it clear that you've got a political bias, at the front of your paper?

Why?

A reason that will be well known to a think tank is that if you associate an argument with a political position, people that feel part of that political position are loathe to question the argument, and quick to dismiss counter-arguments without considering the content.

A paper that leads with "these results are for conservatives only" by a think-tank should ring alarm bells. If they genuinely believe that they have a sound argument, they could present the evidence so that it can sway everyone. If they feel the need to leverage people's politics, and thereby limiting the target to only conservatives, it's likely that they know that their argument doesn't stand analysis.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If that were true, you'd be able to say what this evidence is.

You can't because you're a lying glavset shill.

LifeSite News by [deleted] in ShitpostNews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Strange that all the COVID-19 "misinformation" from months back is now being accepted and validated after the mass harms have been done

And here we see another example of living on a completely fantasy planet.

CDC allows hospitals to classify dead vaxxed people as “unvaccinated” | Principia Scientific Intl. by JasonCarswell in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Trying to deflect glavset shill?

You post disinformation, it get's called out, an honest person would respond to the critique.

A shill would reply "go fuck yourself". Because they've got no response, because they've got not content, because they're spending their whole time posting lies, and don't want to be dragged into the "timesuck" of honest debate, because they're making more rubles by instead posting more shit that they don't want to defend.

We see which you are.

Women's Health probably has done more to harm women's health than any other publication by AmericanMuskrat in ShitpostNews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

most of them were introduced to her when she was a ten year old. Beyond that, she's just an average white girl who's not fat

Probably that's part of it. You see this kid in Harry Potter 1, and then you see this attractive, but not hollywood attractive young woman in "The Perks of Being a Wallflower", or Harry Potter 7.5, and the change kind of hits you.

LifeSite News by [deleted] in ShitpostNews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/JasonCarswell Linked to it again here: https://saidit.net/s/VaccineInjuries/comments/8g23/cdc_allows_hospitals_to_classify_dead_vaxxed/

It's utter crap. wiki says "LifeSiteNews has published misleading information and conspiracy theories, and in 2021, was banned from some social media platforms for spreading COVID-19 misinformation."

I'm slightly curious about why conservative christian groups are keen to die of COVID-19. It seems counterproductive.

CDC allows hospitals to classify dead vaxxed people as “unvaccinated” | Principia Scientific Intl. by JasonCarswell in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wow. What an incredibly bullshit website. I guess those anti-abortionists have broadened their scope of misinformation.

These rules simultaneously inflate the number of covid cases in the unvaccinated and allow hospitals to classify dead vaccinated people as “unvaccinated” deaths.

No, they would be "partially vaccinated". Which is 14 days after the first dose to 13 days after the second.

It appears that these rules were designed in a way to conceal the number of covid cases in the vaccinated and to conceal the number of deaths caused by the covid-19 vaccines.

No it doesn't. Adverse events in the few weeks after a mRNA shot aren't greater than in the few weeks after that. And the incidents of death being amongst the outcomes is negligible: Fewer than one in a million.

According to the CDC’s rules, no one is counted as “fully vaccinated” until a full 14 days have passed from the second injection

Yes. That's how long it takes for the immunity to develop.

This rule conveniently hides 80 percent of the deaths that occur after vaccination and slyly mis-attributes these deaths as “unvaccinated deaths.”

Both wrong. As per the links above.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It makes a huge difference to the people being victimized.

How the fuck is that relevant?

I'm pointing out that it is wrong to multiply by 6 to compare the numbers.

Stop spreading hate and violence.

How does pointing out the bad arithmetic that racist morons create to support their unsupportable fear and ignorance spread hate?

Surely it contributes to demonstrating that hate is less rational.

Police Forces Are FIGHTING BACK AGAINST MANDATORY VACCINES Just As Promised! THIS 👏 IS 👏 HUGE!!! (1:57) ~ Press For Truth by JasonCarswell in Passports

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Demonstrating that the "blue lives matter" was all bullshit.

The biggest killer by far of police in the line of duty is COVID-19. Vaccines would have saved most of those 250 deaths this year so far, and some of the later of the 248 deaths last year.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Group size makes a fundamental difference when comparing behaviors of groups.

It makes no difference to the number of group one on group two rapes compared to vice versa. Which is the statistic you were talking about.

Both numbers are affected the same by the difference in group size.


Rom above: The wording is perfectly clear. And in keeping with racist propaganda. Spreading fear.

What makes you think the words are wrong?

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How many is that?

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's literally nothing in this comment. If you think the numbers I linked to are wrong, show me what the correct numbers are, so we can work out the errors. If you don't know what the correct numbers are, you've got no basis to claim the ones I linked to are wrong. You're just talking shit.

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

data is fake news.

You don't know that, because you've presented no data to the contrary. We've got one set of data, and no criticism of it. (Barring "data is fake news", which doesn't meet the criteria of a criticism, being a opinion with no evidence).

So, since that's the best estimate we have, lets assume that it's about correct, unless we have a good reason to doubt it.

Would need to show video of people dropping in the streets, or first hand accounts from people.

No, that would be a spot sample of a single location or anecdotes. To know the numbers across the country, you have to look at data from the whole country.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

u/ActuallyNot has repeatedly demonstrated he's too intelligent and knowledgeable to be as cognitively incompetent as he pretends to be.

And by "cognitively incompetent" you mean not buying into a grand conspiracy theories with no evidence?

Or is there some well evidenced point you claim I'm avoiding?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're sealioning and wouldn't believe me anyway.

Ha! I win 20c!

You don't even know what vaccine or poison you're talking about!

Do your own research, lazy fuck.

And by "research" you obviously mean research. Going out and buying some samples of the vaccine that you won't say what it is, and do a qualitative analysis in the university lab for some poison that you don't know what it is?

You wouldn't mean reading your glavset propaganda on a public forum. Because we both know that's not fucking research. Dumb fuck.

No more today.

Yeah. A shill can only refuse to justify one baseless lie a day. Otherwise more people might wise up to the pattern.

First time in history that the ineffectiveness of a medicine is being blamed on those who haven't taken it by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Pertussis?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have it backwards. The image got the wording wrong. That's it. The math was fine but applies to a different measure not worded.

The wording is perfectly clear. And in keeping with racist propaganda. Spreading fear.

What makes you think the words are wrong?

The math was fine but applies to a different measure not worded.

What measure does the math apply to?

You divert from the point because you don't want to address their vastly disproportionate 11x black-white interracial raping despite being 1/6th the population of whites.

The 1/6th doesn't make any difference.

Why do you defend blacks raping whites so much?

I'm not defending rape, I pointing out that racists can't do mathematics. Which is ironic, because they think they've got a higher IQ than blacks.

I wonder if anyone has done an IQ study on racists.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You wouldn't know a poison vaccine if was injected and retarded your critical thinking - but I suspect you were just born that way. At least you won't reproduce.

Okay, I'm going in.

Which vaccine is poisonous and what is the poison?

For fucks sake. I've got 20 cents that you refuse to answer that.

How can I be a Glavset shill when I don't even know what they do

What you're doing: Spreading lies about coronavirus in order to increase the impact of the disease on the population and economy of America, and NATO allies.

Sweden Suspends Moderna Shot Indefinitely After Vaxxed Patients Develop Crippling Heart Condition by zyxzevn in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You were asked what reliable transparent evidence have you ever presented?

Not what evidence you you have of other Glavset shills upvoting your comments.

Are you just here to timesuck & troll with your cuck out?

And by "timesuck" here you mean, asking if you have any evidence for your bullshit glavset propaganda.

Your attempts to shut down that conversation are transparent, lying shill.

Sweden Suspends Moderna Shot Indefinitely After Vaxxed Patients Develop Crippling Heart Condition by zyxzevn in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you just learn that word yesterday?

I've just worked out what you are.

Your toddler's mind is transparent through your keyboard.

Whereas "STOP SEALIONING!!" is supposed to be opaque and mature?

Your lack of self-awareness is overwhelming.

If Russia is for free-thinking and truth-seeking then I'm all for Russia,

They're for the destruction of the people and economy in the west by spreading distrust in democracy, distrust in science and medicine, conflict between the classes and races and making the pandemic as damaging as possible.

because the Western governments and media that you shill for are full of lies, and always have been.

As I suspected.

Actually, I simply refuse to be dragged into discussions with sealioning asstrolls

Precisely. And the reason you refuse, is because you've got no evidence to support your false claims, and you don't want that exposed.

Open your eyes or go fuck yourself shilly - or better, get royally fucked by an authoritarian.

And that's the best evidence you'll be able to give, lying glavset shill.

First time in history that the ineffectiveness of a medicine is being blamed on those who haven't taken it by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Polio?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't produce bad math.

"despite blacks having been only ~1/6th the size of the white population."

Is bad math. The ratio of population has the same effect of black on white crime as it does on white on black crime.

I agreed with you that the image has bad wording yet you continue to divert attention to it even though it's irrelevant to the larger points.

If you reckon the image had bad wording, you didn't agree with me. It had bad maths. It says that the risk to white woman from black men was 64 times that of the reverse. The correct value is 1.9 and much of the difference between that and 1 is plausibly racism in the justice system.

The 64x does however give a valid scale to get a sense of the abuse behavior

Not or doesn't. You could argue that 1.9 x does, but you'd be ignoring other demographic factors of you were to attribute that to race alone.

because white women will still be their primary target at scale.

You should present some evidence of this.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anecdotes of "bias" are more than outweighed by the reality of anti-white ideological propaganda fueling anti-white violence and crime.

Citation?

Black people are daily engaging in anti-white crimes and anti-white slurs while abusing and hitting and robbing and raping their victims, that are never adequately documented.

Citation?

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Are there a lot of Jews in Wuhan?

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Big pharma doesn't have poison vaccine nor a depopulation agenda. They have a profit motive. Poisoning and depopulation reduce their market.

As you know, Glavset shill.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

White non-hispanics rape at around 7000 FBI-documented cases per year across their population of around 60-65%: 200,000,000 for simplicity.

Blacks commit rape at around 4500 FBI-documented cases per year across their population of around 12.5%: 40,000,000 for simplicity.

"Are convicted of" better reflects the reality than "FBI-documented cases", as the bias in the criminal system contributes.

But so do demographic factors, which are improving: Black imprisonment rate in the U.S. has fallen by a third since 2006

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You've failed in your attempt to divert focus away from the issue that matters.

For fuck's sake. I'm correcting your bad maths over and over again. "Oooh, but that's not what matters" doesn't excuse you.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You've only presented data for "are convicted of rape". Don't try to claim that rapes are in the same ratio without evidence.

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If by protesting you mean lawsuits, wrong.

No, I mean of the unions currently striking.

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

also, anyone with half a brain knows the numbers are bullshit anyway

What are the correct numbers then?

as usual, you completely and utterly fail in threads like this.

So far I've provided data, and you've provided none.

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Here are some of those who have died from COVID. It's small, but its significant to their families, and possibly colleagues, (although that's not obvious from the protests).

What is the number one way cops die?

In the line of duty deaths in 2021 were 65% CoVID-19, then 13.3% Gunfire.

The next largest killers were automobile crash and vehicular assault both at 4.4%

Sweden Suspends Moderna Shot Indefinitely After Vaxxed Patients Develop Crippling Heart Condition by zyxzevn in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dig further back.

Didn't have you. Nearly everything you post is pro-Glavset misinformation and lies. And you desperately avoid discussion about them, because you know they don't stand up to scrutiny.

Sweden Suspends Moderna Shot Indefinitely After Vaxxed Patients Develop Crippling Heart Condition by zyxzevn in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have a universal history of lying and shilling and then avoiding transparency with the phrase "STOP SEALIONING".

We started civilly and you refused to come around to the evidence obvious to everyone but you with your agendas.

What reliable, transparent evidence have you ever presented?

Unvaxxed Child Less Risk Of Serious COVID Than Vaxxed 70 Year Old (13:48) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show [From 9m+ is noteworthy about the GreenPass social credit system.] by JasonCarswell in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have blind faith in corrupt science without questioning.

Not at all. I look at the data if I can. I look at the citations. I consider the target audience. I consider the conflicts of interest.

The difference is that by "questioning", here you mean watching conspiracy theory videos on the internet.

Authentic science is a transparent discovery and open verification process (not settled) of elimination based on a hypothesis.

Yeah, you remember that tranparency and open verification thing next time you're queried about one of your "facts" and respond with the Glavset-recommended "STOP SEALIONING AT ME. I DON'T DEAL WELL WITH TRANSPARENCY OR VERIFICATION".

You don't accept counter-narratives because you're dense and/or a shill.

You don't supply counter-narratives. You just shill Glavset lies.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I defy you to find a single lie from me on SaidIt.

Found one: " /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot who shill for big pharma."

Found another: "[...] authoritarian big pharma shill."

Found another: "YOU are an enemy of the people until you change your ways."

Found another :"You are obliviously delusional or a really shitty feigning actor"

I defy you to find a single SaidIt comment from you that contains information and isn't a lie.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What a steaming crock of shit.

True. But it is nonetheless what you spread.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Or to /u/JasonCraswell who spreads misinformation to kill people and the economy in the west for Glavset.

Corruption of the Scientific Process (some quotes) by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The problem is that peer review, flawed as it is, is the best that we have.

It's from there we have to tease the facts from the fiction, with repeatability and reproducibility.

It would be easier if there was "your facts" to stand against my profits. But they are obscured too, initially.

Science eventually corrects itself. Probably not in time for the current generation. But it is the best we have.

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What's the Jew flu numbers?

Guns Don't Kill People; Alec Baldwin Kills People by [deleted] in memes

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

With a gun.

Sweden Suspends Moderna Shot Indefinitely After Vaxxed Patients Develop Crippling Heart Condition by zyxzevn in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that really your impression.

Here are Jason's most recent posts to me:

1) Propaganda bullshit.
2) Inauthentic big pharma shill sealioning.
3) You are not the source and your information is from proven MSM liars /[.../] Don't comment on my posts, and also, go fuck yourself dangerously - or smarten up and quit shilling lies.

There's no evidence of intelligence is there? Nor any of being interested in discussion.

Sweden Suspends Moderna Shot Indefinitely After Vaxxed Patients Develop Crippling Heart Condition by zyxzevn in VaccineInjuries

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This post doesn't contain your usual lies, Jason. But also, I don't subscribe to this sub.

Sweden has noticed that Moderna apparently increases the incidence of myocarditis by something like 13 per 1,000,000 compared to pfizer. Or a 0.0013% chance. "Crippling" isn't very specific, but most cases certainly require hospitalisation, but they mostly respond well to standard treatment with a mild and selflimiting course.

Low, but they figure if they use pfizer, they'll keep a couple of dozen people out of hospital. Fair call.

Unvaxxed Child Less Risk Of Serious COVID Than Vaxxed 70 Year Old (13:48) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show [From 9m+ is noteworthy about the GreenPass social credit system.] by JasonCarswell in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you even know what SCIENTISM is?

No. But I know was SCIENCE is.

Ironic coming from the second biggest liar shills on here.

You're missing the point: If you don't want commentary, don't post in a public forum.

Your bullshit lies about truth being a shill is just dragging down the discussion on the pyramid of debate. As is your MO.

If you think something is my comment is wrong, present your evidence and argument. If you can't I think we can comfortably conclude that it is you who is lying.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You ignore what 64x represents.

It represents racists being dumb at math, and attempting to fearmonger to try to explain to themselves the fear that they live with.

Basically its a demographic of low IQ cowards.

despite blacks having been only ~1/6th the size of the white population.

That makes no difference does it. The proportion of perpetrators times the proportion of victims of opposite races is equal.

1/6 x 5/6 = 5/6 x 1/6

Because multiplication is commutative.

Opportunity in no way negates the 64x scale estimate of disparity.

11x.

More blacks rape more often

You've only presented data for "more blacks are convicted of rape more often". Don't try to claim that rapes are in the same ratio without evidence.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blacks are raping whites over 11 times the amount of the reverse

That's not what the lying, fear mongering statistic said. It said that white women were at 64 times the risk from black men than black women from white men.

Racists have to lie to make their point. And therefore we can strongly suspect that the point doesn't stand on it's own.

despite blacks having been only ~1/6th the size of the white population.

What do you mean "despite". That makes no fucking difference.

Thousands are marching into NYC to protest the vaccine mandate as we speak! by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's only one union that is protesting the vaccine mandate. The police.

Five police were killed by covid for every one killed by gunfire since the start of the pandemic. The fact that they're protesting against taking the vaccine shows that they're not interested in blue lives after all.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blacks have been raping whites over 11 times the amount of the reverse and blacks have been only ~1/6th the size of the white population.

That says less about behaviour and more about relative population that you're trying to claim.

  • A white rapist would happen upon a black victim only about 1/6th of the time, because of the relative size of the victim's population.
  • A black rapist would happen upon a white victim about 5/6th of the time, for the same reason.

Also a black man accused of rape and convicted is about 3.5 times more likely to be innocent than a white man is accused of rape. The figure is much higher for black men convicted of raping a white woman. Source

(And, although it's irrelevant to this conversation, it should be mentioned that that innocent black man will be serving a longer sentence than an innocent white man, and will be incarcerated for four and a half years longer before being released, on average).

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What if after facing the inequities of the justice system, they become more aware of white privilege, and become more anti-white?

Here in the United States we call it the school to prison pipeline.

Keep an eye on that in Texas. Outlawing abortion has a history of increasing the diameter of that pipeline about four-fold over a 15 to 20 year time-frame.

Unvaxxed Child Less Risk Of Serious COVID Than Vaxxed 70 Year Old (13:48) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show [From 9m+ is noteworthy about the GreenPass social credit system.] by JasonCarswell in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

and on the flip side, vaccines are more dangerous to young people and harmless to the old.

Is that true?

Unvaxxed Child Less Risk Of Serious COVID Than Vaxxed 70 Year Old (13:48) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show [From 9m+ is noteworthy about the GreenPass social credit system.] by JasonCarswell in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are not the source and your information is from proven MSM liars.

Nope. Scientific sources.

But you've heard this, you know this, and you still choose to shill for evil.

Telling truths isn't evil, Jason. And neither is it sealioning.

Don't comment on my posts, and also, go fuck yourself dangerously - or smarten up and quit shilling lies.

Don't post lies in a public forum then. They will be called out.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's only showing everyone you ignore stark behavior of a 64x interracial black-white rape perpetration disparity proportionately and thus the consequences resulting from demographics.

Oh, you didn't get the maths in the comment to which you're relying either?

That's starting to fail to surprise me. Read it through again.

You did exactly what I said you'd do if you would only bother reading fully.

I show that in your example it's the larger group with the lower proportion of interracial rapes that would be doing more interracial rapes if the populations were equal.

Only a psychopath would divert focus from talking about a group whose behavior includes 50% of their population committing interracial rape.

You're the one who wants to project to the situation in which the populations were identical. In that case the other populations would be committing 500 times the number of interracial rapes as the group that includes 50% of their population committing interracial rape at the "current" population levels. Which would take more than 50% of their population, unless they've got something like 49% of their population doing a thousand times the number of rapes as the average of the group you're trying to demonise.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How do you feel when they're victimised by whites?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He can't process the fact that a population only ~1/6th the size of its victims caused over 11 times the number of its black-white interracial rape.

There's a different whole argument there, I address that the smaller group will tend to have more interracial rapes, because of the increased opportunity here.

I didn't get into a discussion of that bad maths, because this bad maths is very straightforward: 1.9 times isn't scary enough for them to feel justified in their fear. So they said 64.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The point evidently intended to be conveyed by the image was the 64x part

The wording is pretty clear. They evidently intended to stoke fear of the black man. The relative risk of rape is the relevant statistic.

White women are at much higher risk of being victims as it stands already

That's not proven. 1.9 times by convictions. But you'd expect less reporting and fewer convictions from reported rapes by black women.

Now you're ignoring it.

I'm not ignoring it. It's a mischaracterisation of the racist propaganda linked to.

Unvaxxed Child Less Risk Of Serious COVID Than Vaxxed 70 Year Old (13:48) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show [From 9m+ is noteworthy about the GreenPass social credit system.] by JasonCarswell in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They're just truths. If they make you experience cognitive dissonance, consider your beliefs, don't strike out at the source of information.

Unvaxxed Child Less Risk Of Serious COVID Than Vaxxed 70 Year Old (13:48) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show [From 9m+ is noteworthy about the GreenPass social credit system.] by JasonCarswell in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So I'm no Alex Jones tinfoil-hatter

Me neither

but if the mass vaccination of risky, experimental new methods

It's not that risky, nor that experimental

are not in fact a long term plan for mass sterilization

What? How do you get from elderly are at increased risk from COVID to the extent that an unvaccinated child is at lest risk of serious covid than a vaccinated 70 year old to "long term plan for sterilization.

And where did they inject your vaccine? Mine was just in the arm.

then why the push to get society used to forcing it on children?

So that they don't get the infection, and spread it to their grandparents. Or parents.

There's been what, a 100/1000000000 deaths from covid that are from otherwise healthy children?

A couple or few deaths per million children in the population .... I don't know what that would be in terms of case/mortality. And about half the deaths in children that aren't otherwise healthy.

Why get society comfortable with said experimentation for something that's not crippling (like polio)?

A couple of weeks in ICU is moderately crippling for an extended period of time in most patients.

And don't say to dry up the reservoir so old people can't catch it afterward. You don't risk the young to protect the old. That's not moral.

It depends on how much risk. Raising orphans is expensive.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's not meaningful.

Yes it is. You have to understand the racist mindset. They live in constant overwhelming fear of other people, especially ones that don't look like them. This is why their family trees don't have branches.

The 1.9 times is the risk of interracial rape (ignoring the bias in reporting and convictions. The true figure is plausibly more equal) for a white woman compared to a black woman. If you're a racist and therefore a coward, this is the point that you live by, and try to encourage the rest of the world to understand. You are in fear of black people. Now you have to justify it. Look in how much danger white women are in because of black men!

You're diverting attention to poor wording of an image in order to miss the meaningful part.

It's the poor math that's more outstanding.

That has societal ramifications of populations going up and down and portraying a sense of scale of abuse. Behavior affects people: rapes, robs, kills, destroys people, and it certainly matters to the people victimized by it when the population of abusers goes up unchecked.

See? There you go. It is about fear.

Extreme example to hammer this point across for lurkers. I assume you'll ignore it, so it's not for you:

Group A: 0.1% committing interracial rape. Group B: 50% committing interracial rape. Nation's population: 0.99999 of Group A and 0.00001 of Group B.

I'll just point out some realities for those figures for the lurker. I assume you'll not understand it, so it's not for you:

Someone from Group A intending to commit a rape will see 100,000 of their own race for every 1 of the other race. So, if they don't care who they rape, 0.1% of them committing interracial rape implies they each rape an average of 100 people.

Someone from Group B intending to commit a rape will see 100,000 of the other race for every 1 of their race. So if they don't care who they rape, 50% of them committing interracial rape implies that they each rape an average of just under 0.5 people. (0.499995 people).

So the "measurements that provide understanding are the rates of the action for each group and what that could amount to proportionately in civilization (given equal populations)", would be that in that case group A would be committing the vast majority of interracial rapes, due to the fact that the increased opportunity so dramatically outweighs the tendency to rape in this extreme example.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are trying to shift the burden of proof by asking someone else to prove a negative here.

"In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same" isn't a negative. That really shows the absence of your argument. You're not fooling anyone.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This "same user" you are talking about.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Correct, 64x would be the likelihood of a black man perpetrating black/white interracial rape, when compared to a white man, which proves the point racists were trying make here. T

They were trying to make a point about white woman being at a much greater likelihood of being raped by a black man than a black woman by a white man. Stoking the fear of the black man thing.

The two things I have taken away from this discussion are:

1) Racists lie to try to justify the fear that they live with.
2) The racists here are exceptionally low IQ. It's not sufficient to point out their math errors, they can't do simple arithmetic, you have to walk them slowly through each basic calculation several times.

1 - Black men lack impulse control
2 - Black women are less desirable
Everyone already knew this though.

I didn't know those. Whats your best evidence for them?

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You should be a little clearer then.

I think it was pretty obvious.

Also that just proves my original point that it's absurd to say you know how many rapes are occurring that aren't reported.

How does it prove that, do you claim?

Unless you subject a claim of rape to the scrutiny the justice system would you can't know if one has occurred or not

The Justice system has racial biases. A well designed survey doesn't. There's a lower standard of proof, but at least you could, conceivably, compare black on white rapes with white on black.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't make the claim that "In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same."

You make the claim you provide the proof. Don't try to shift that burden of proof. But nice try, racist cunt.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He just literally told me that there's no such thing as presumption of innocence in our legal system.

I see you've misunderstood.

In this post, when I said "This is not part of the justice system", the meaning is that the random survey of who has been raped is not part of the justice system, and therefore the presumption of innocence doesn't apply. No one is going to jail. The meaning is not "the presumption of innocence is not part of the justice system".

Fucking waste of time.

Quite.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He believes it is because racist white people drive to the ghetto, shoot blacks, then leave, without being prosecuted, as an explanation, lololol.

I can't find where he suggested that as a reason.

Can you link me to his comment, my dear racist cunt?

Because I daresay, I suspect you might by bullshitting.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

40 years? That's a big call. Season 1 of "Stranger Things" was pretty good. And the first few seasons of "Game of Thrones", although they killed that so badly in the last 2 seasons, that it colours the whole thing a bit shit.

I've not finished "Dark" yet. That's going pretty well.

I enjoyed the original star trek, but it was pretty much a western. Good guys ride in to town. Find some problem. Solve it with pro-action attitude and heroic demeanour. Good guys fly off into metaphorical sunset. Entertaining, but couldn't be accused of being the finest piece of television in a period of time.

Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The hypothetical is the only meaningful measure capable of showing the severity of the population's behavior compared to the other population

The false statement "[A] white woman is 64 TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man that a black woman is by a white man" is meaningful. It's about the risk of rape that white women face from black men compared to that that black women face from white men. They just got the maths wrong, and got 64 when the correct value is 1.9.

And that 1.9 is going to be subject to some bias from reporting and conviction rates.