This was bound to happen somewhere by jet199 in NotTheOnion

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most of the gun violence is black on black here.

Is it?

What data are you using for that?

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Clearly, you are a shill.

For who?

How is that clear?

Why would a shill spend time on a site with a reach of 2-10 readers when tens of thousands are not difficult to reach on Twitter, Reddit and facebook?

What are you smoking?

HRC used private servers with classified info.

Does that break a law?

Which law?

Then destroyed the evidence.

Well if the evidence is destroyed, maybe that's why they didn't prosecute.

Numerous legal cases where witnesses against her coincidentally die.

How numerous, exactly?

Joe Biden Brags about getting Ukranian Prosecutor Fired YouTube (1:16).

Right. He got rid of a corrupt prosecutor, who wasn't prosecuting fraud amongst politicians.

Good on him.

This was bound to happen somewhere by jet199 in NotTheOnion

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

White murdering white?

Or white murdering anyone?

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This appears to be a classic case of Lawfare.

A bunch of civil cases, and different people moving against money laundering or fraud or election interference?

It appears to me to be a criminal and fraudster's expected legal troubles.

Curious that these same groups aren't investigating HRC,

For what?

or Biden's billion dollar Ukraine blackmail

No wrongdoing

(and public admission of guilt).

... You might have to remind me of that.

This was bound to happen somewhere by jet199 in NotTheOnion

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thats because they have less niggers. Low nigger population zones in the USA with guns have the same low murder rates.

There's a few things you should do in order to make this into a reasonable argument.

1) Get the grammar right. Blacks are countable, so it's fewer not less. People will wonder if you are simply afraid of a black who can spell "job" taking your job, rather than you having a sound argument.
2) Avoid the racial slur. People will assume that you're suffering from racism, rather than having a sound argument.
3) Provide your evidence. Provide your reasoning. Your point isn't obvious. For instance, This table shows that slightly less than half (Single victim, single offender, federal) homicides are perpetrated by blacks. If that extrapolates to all homicides, the rate for other races is still somewhere around 3.9 per 100,000, which is still 2.4 times the "low" murder rates in Australia.

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

... Similar to one of your other identical comments, the source information is linked in my comment to which you are replying ...

So I need to better understand what in particular you think is disinformation or misinformation.

Obviously this would be a stupid place for a shill to waste their time. The reach on twitter, facebook or reddit would be tens to hundreds of thousands times what you'd get for the same effort here.

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The links to the sources of my information are in the post to which you are replying. Would you mind clarifying what you think is disinformation or misinformation?

This was bound to happen somewhere by jet199 in NotTheOnion

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Murder rate in Australia calculated from Murders in Australia, here, over the population of Australia.

The USA rate, from the graph on this page

Please feel welcome to ask for my sources if I don't provide them. I don't intentionally post misinformation nor disinformation.

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, the New York Attorney General is still going after his taxes, and he has been informed that that investigation is no longer purely civil.

and

E. Jean Carroll is still going after him for defamation.

and

Summer Zervos, is still going after him for defamation.

and

Mary Trump is still going after him for fraud.

and

A number of investors are still going after the Trump Corporation for fraud.

and

The DC Attorney General is still going after a number of Trump-affiliated entities for misuse if inauguration funds.

and

Reps. Karen Bass et al. are still going after him for Incitement of the Jan. 6 Capitol Attack

and

Eric Swalwell is separately still going after him for conspiring to interfere with the Electoral College Count on Jan 6

and

Two Capitol Police officers–both on duty during the Jan. 6 insurrection– are still going after him for injuries they sustained while protecting the Capitol

and

A second group of Capitol Police officers are still going after him, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and other affiliates involved in allegedly planning and executing the Jan. 6 riots.

and

The LDF is still going after him for trying to overturn the 2020 election in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the Ku Klux Klan Act

and

The Scottish Greens are still going after his golf courses in Scotland for money laundering, although that's probably on it's last legs,

and

The Manhattan District Attorney is still going after him for potential tax crimes, insurance fraud, and other financial crimes under state law.

and

The DC Attorney General, Karl Racine, is still going after him in a criminal investigation into Trump’s alleged role in provoking the Jan. 6th riots.

and

The Fulton County DA’s Office are still going after him in a criminal investigation into attempted election interference: There are reportedly two grand juries considering subpoenas for documents relevant to the investigation.

So there's still quite a lot of action for him on the legal front. source

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Because these rioters were proud of what they were doing.

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

it's like the whole thing was staged or something by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I Don't Do Big Pharma Drugs. Period. by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It occurred to me that some people might not get the joke, but I posted it anyway.

This was bound to happen somewhere by jet199 in NotTheOnion

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Notice how they started this shit after they confiscated the guns.

Notice too how the murder rate in Australia in 2020 was about 1.6 per 100,000 people.

And that the murder rate in the USA in 2020 was about 6.5 per 100,000 people.

So it's not all downside if you like not getting murdered.

This was bound to happen somewhere by jet199 in NotTheOnion

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

JUST IN

Nope. This has been the law for more than four years.

It is now illegal for Australian protestors [sic]

Not quite. It's state law for Victoria.

to wear masks to protect themselves from the global pandemic and (supposedly) protect others.

Wrong. What you can be sentenced for up to 15 years for is committing violent disorder, while wearing a face covering used primarily either for concealing the participant's identity or to protect the participant from the effects of a crowd-controlling substance.

Wearing one to protect from the pandemic does not increase the sentence for violent disorder. You can only be sentenced for up to 10 years in that case.

CRIMES ACT 1958 - SECT 195I
Violent disorder

“Then he wrote a paper where he said gain of function research was worth the risk of a pandemic, and that he had even funded coronavirus research in conjunction with the Chinese military,” Ms Markson said. by Questionable in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Both of which insist that the research is to continue, despite the inherent risk.

No. Fauci argued the opposite: The voluntary moratorium on gain-of-function research related to the transmissibility of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus should continue.

I Don't Do Big Pharma Drugs. Period. by EndlessSunflowers in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

'Ay up.

T' big farmer mon addle some brass.

If 'e gra drugs, 'e does neya 'arm.

“Then he wrote a paper where he said gain of function research was worth the risk of a pandemic, and that he had even funded coronavirus research in conjunction with the Chinese military,” Ms Markson said. by Questionable in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The main argument of the paper is that the moratorium on gain of function research of influenza A should continue.

I think the point that gain of function research is worth the risk of pandemic is intentionally missing that point. Moreover it's even a little bit distorted from what he says in the paper at all. He doesn't use this paper to suggest that gain of function research is worth the risk of a pandemic, but that he has said that in the past.

For these reasons, I'm going to disagree with you there Questionable.

“Then he wrote a paper where he said gain of function research was worth the risk of a pandemic, and that he had even funded coronavirus research in conjunction with the Chinese military,” Ms Markson said. by Questionable in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then he wrote a paper where he said gain of function research was worth the risk of a pandemic

Is that a fair description of the paper?

The abstract that he wrote is:

The voluntary moratorium on gain-of-function research related to the transmissibility of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus should continue, pending the resolution of critical policy questions concerning the rationale for performing such experiments and how best to report their results. The potential benefits and risks of these experiments must be discussed and understood by multiple stakeholders, including the general public, and all decisions regarding such research must be made in a transparent manner.

The full paper is here.

He did write Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

He immediately goes on to explain It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.

And, completely counter to the spin by sky news then writes However, we must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally. We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place. Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully.

It reads to me as more thoughtful and cautious than Sky News Australia would like their audience to believe. And I don't trust the motivations of media that appear to be adding spin to a story. So much of their income derives from native advertising compared to selling stories, that I think it's fair to ask "Who is paying for Sky News to have me believe this spin on the story?"

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Four times, /u/d3rr, if you read it in the right light, I think /u/ActuallyNot really wants to get banned.

Are you fucking illiterate as well as just a moron?

I'm literally not name calling exactly the way you aren't, so stop being a snowflake.

I guess the proof is that you're a lousy liar - or maybe that's proof that you actually are Mossad.

Stop being such a dribbling moron. What kind of useless waste of space accuses everyone of being Mossad even though they explicitly speak against Israel's foreign policy and encourage people to support Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions?

Is there are more pathetic waste of bandwidth than a wet shit that thinks anyone who's not overtly racist against Jewish people is Mossad?

This reads like the Babylon Bee:

Does it? Wow. What a strong rational argument. Why don't you fuck off back to whatever Babylon Bee is?

Actually, ActuallyNot, that's a subjective judgement

No, you're a complete waste of space.

Seven.

You should stop posting drunk. I said "Don't be a dumb cunt", I did not say " You're a dumb cunt", regardless of what you obviously are. So what do you think you're counting?

Reddit has received a letter from the US government asking them to rat out people on the site who questioned the results of the American election. by Ave_Satanas in WatchRedditDie

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do hate that people have beliefs that make them want to destroy people or property, when those beliefs are also stupid.

And so I ask again: Because it results in activity that is quite appropriately designated criminal, how should that be dealt with?

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Then don't be a chicken-little snowflake then.

And while you're at it don't be a dumb cunt. Of course I'm not Mossad. Are you a flat earther that you think there's only one place in the world that's not your fucking time zone.

You are clearly a pathetic waste of space. That's not name calling that's fact.

Don't be a lying cunt.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I avoid Reddit, and name-calling.

So when you called me a "lazy fuck" twice in this post, a Mossad shill and a SJW troll in this post, how do you feel you're going with that avoiding of name calling?

Slippery Slope by Tarrock in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't put bullshit words in my mouth.

Calm the fuck down, snowflake.

I was asking for clarification, not putting words into your mouth.

Only IF they say it.

How can it be hate speech if they don't say it?

Exactly my point: All laws that are to suppress "hate" are political bullshit, just as "equality" is bullshit when all everyone wants is consistent fairness.

What?

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can compare the outcomes for similar situations for people of dissimilar backgrounds or demographics.

Reddit has received a letter from the US government asking them to rat out people on the site who questioned the results of the American election. by Ave_Satanas in WatchRedditDie

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That one is likely true.

There were people claiming that the election observers were removed from the counting room somewhere. And had to observe from outside the room, and the windows were boarded up.

This was bullshit. Observers from both parties were not excluded.

This shit

The Kracken shit pushed by Sidney Powell is likely not true.

Yeah. The lawsuits have all fallen flat. And reasonably so. And Powell et al. are facing disbarment for bringing cases to the court without them having any merit.

But there were people saying "this list of lawsuits is in front of the courts" or "these lawsuits are being appealed because they were thrown out by democratic planted judges". Which if you looked up the lawsuits was just wrong.

However, part of figuring out that was full of shit was by actually being able to discuss it with other people, including those who genuinely thought it was true.

Sure. But if you're looking for the people that were spreading disinformation intentionally you start with the group of people spreading disinformation, and then you see if they're paid disinformation specialists. And if they had intention to seed violence.

It seems to me you just hate the idea that not everyone believes the same things you do

That's not true. I believe Tyrannosaurus Rex had feathers, but I would be interested in speaking to an informed person who believes the opposite. I believe that the earth is an oblate spheroid, but I would not be interested in speaking to someone who believes it is flat, in most cases. Because they'd have to be fucking stupid.

I do hate that people have beliefs that make them want to destroy people or property, when those beliefs are also stupid. And because it results in activity that is quite appropriately designated criminal, how should that be dealt with?

Not allow people to leave the school system until they can demonstrate some basic critical thinking?

Make being dumb as a rock itself illegal?

Accept that we're going to live in a society in which enemy nations are increasingly going to instigate riots and violence?

Or move against some of the malicious spreading of misinformation?

None of those are great, but some are better than others.

Anti-vaxxer mother and daughter die from Covid in Belfast hospital by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry, I'm not following.

Why did everybody clap?

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Being treated unfairly by the court is less subjective.

You can compare the outcomes for similar situations for people of dissimilar backgrounds or demographics.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Pardon me. I must have missed some subtleties of "Go back to r/AHS", because it's not obvious that there's a discussion there.

Although to be fair, I don't know what r/AHS is, so I may well have missed the subtext.

Please enlighten me, what is the discussion here that you claim I'm "dragging down"

And while we're here, can you elaborate on "You are warned"? What is that supposed to mean?

Slippery Slope by Tarrock in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't be a lazy fuck.

Bad day again Jason?

Want to talk about it?

You claimed there were anti-bullying laws in Canada that were sufficient to police hate speech and discrimination in Canada.

From your own links:

“Bullying” isn’t marked as a criminal offence as per the Canadian Criminal Code.

Hence my question.

Do you want to have another go without being a cunt or are you happy to leave it at this, now that we've discovered that there's no obvious laws that cover this, and certainly you're mistaken about the name of those laws?

Only IF they say it.

How can it be hate speech if they don't say it?

We have discrimination laws.

My point exactly. C-16 added the group "gender identity or expression" to your discrimination laws.

All laws that are to suppress "hate" are political bullshit

Are you calling the laws against inciting or promoting hatred "suppressing" hate?

Because anything that doesn't allow it to be spread is suppressing it?

The way you wrote it seems like you think that how an individual feels is criminal, and the laws are designed to suppress the feeling of hate in an individual. That's not the case.

Anti-vaxxer mother and daughter die from Covid in Belfast hospital by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is sad.

I thought that the antivax community would disappear if there was a return of smallpox or even a significant resurgence of polio.

But here we are in the middle of a pandemic that has killed 5 million people. And people are actively refusing a life saving jab.

These preventable deaths have decimated this family. It's certainly sad.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The sky is blue. You're chicken-little fear-mongering about hate speech laws is pathetic.

There are genuine things you should be afraid of. Grow a spine, snowflake.

Slippery Slope by Tarrock in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We have laws for bullying, harassment, and crimes. Use those.

Do you. What are your anti bullying laws?

  • but we can never read other people's minds.

You don't have to when it comes to applying hate speech laws. Because they said it.

Nail them for the crime

The crime is discrimination or hate speech. The nature of those crimes is that they have a target group.

Proof?

The C-16 added the words "gender identity or expression" in three places to existing laws, that already protect other groups who are victims of hate speech and discrimination.

The exact same law already acts on those other groups. Without causing a breakdown in society.

Now who's being stupid?

Not sure I'm following. Is it you?

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's not in an at risk group for being treated unfairly by the court system.

Anti-vaxxer mother and daughter die from Covid in Belfast hospital by ActuallyNot in Coronavirus

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another sad death of a healthy young antivaxer, and her mother.

Reddit has received a letter from the US government asking them to rat out people on the site who questioned the results of the American election. by Ave_Satanas in WatchRedditDie

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was massive fraud, facilitated by Dominion Voting systems?

Or by miscounting, and that observers were kept away?

Or that there was massive fraud by Smartmatic?

There were a Kraken of court cases that had some merit?

Fauci was ‘up to his neck’ funding coronavirus research in Wuhan by Chipit in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or it could be that Fauci couldn't do his wildly risky gain-of-function research in America

Americans were co-authors on the paper. But obviously the bat corona-virus is prevalent in China, so that's where you need to get the samples.

When it blew up in his face, he then claimed that an attack on Fauci is an attack on science itself.

"Blew up in his face"?

He's a standard bearer for science and a recognised candid teller of the truth. The Murdoch press are trying to tell Australians (of all people) the opposite, but he's well regarded as a public servant. There's "In Fauci we trust" and “Dr Fauci is my hero” t-shirts.

Yes, he referred to himself in the third person.

Could you be mistaken about that too?

“Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science,” Fauci said Wednesday.

Reddit has received a letter from the US government asking them to rat out people on the site who questioned the results of the American election. by Ave_Satanas in WatchRedditDie

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

No, not who questioned the results. Who spread disinformation about it.

Fauci was ‘up to his neck’ funding coronavirus research in Wuhan by Chipit in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Murdoch press is pushing an anti-Fauci line.

Presuming this is native advertising for some client, who do you speculate the client is?

Australia is struggling against China at the moment, but I would have thought that Russia would be largely disinterested.

Would this be an effort by the Chinese communist party to undermine vaccination efforts in Australia, to drag out the economic damage from the pandemic to give China an edge in the trade war?

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hate speech can be made by minorities, and does not say that everyone is equal.

"Hatred is predicated on destruction, and hatred against identifiable groups therefore thrives on insensitivity, bigotry and destruction of both the target group and of the values of our society. Hatred in this sense is a most extreme emotion that belies reason; an emotion that, if exercised against members of an identifiable group, implies that those individuals are to be despised, scorned, denied respect and made subject to ill-treatment on the basis of group affiliation"

Doesn't matter who says it. Certainly doesn't claim that everyone is equal, because it targets an identifiable group.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Calm the fuck down.

Just because your desire for discrimination and hate speech have been eroded in the past 20 years (and recovered over the past 5), doesn't mean that truth isn't a sound defence where free speech is protected.

Slippery Slope by Tarrock in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Only left-wing media outlets say he identified his wife, child, etc.

You claim that the Vancouver Sun is "left wing"?

What's your basis for that claim?

and only right-wing media outlets say he was jailed just for pronoun usage.

Mass resisitance, breitbard and the federalist?

It's a bit of a stretch to lump them in with media outlets isn't it? Surely we shouldn't be comparing the fake news industry with journalism?

but I only found evidence of him violating the pronoun mandate.

He didn't give the interviews reported on by the vancouver sun?

Furthermore, the left-wing media outlets never provide sources for their claims; I can't just trust them without evidence.

Jesus mate. You just linked to fucking breitbart.

It's hard to find the original videos, since they're banned from big tech for "hate speech," so all I have to work with is one clip I found on YouTube (that probably won't be there for long). There are longer interviews somewhere, but I didn't find them.

Okay. Most plausibly he did both. Gave an interview in which he misgendered his child. To be fair it wouldn't be know to the court if he misgendered his child in private, so that he breached that part of the court order implies that he breached the bit about talking publicly about it.

Even if he broke that part of the order too: it doesn't warrant six months in literal prison, unless he or someone else was sending them death threats —

If the court tells you to do something, and you don't, the punishment has to ramp up pretty quickly. If you keep asking people to comply, it wastes the court's time, and makes a mockery of the legal system if ignoring it is a viable option. You can be jailed indefinitely for contempt in the US. All you have to do to avoid literal prison is do what the judge says while you appeal.

Slippery Slope by Tarrock in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They passed the stupid law for a reason.

The "stupid" law being C-16?

The adding of "gender identity or expression" to identifiable groups protected from discrimination, to identifiable groups that can be the target of hate speech, and to the criminal code allowing a judge to consider hate crimes against them when sentencing?

How is that stupid? The exact same law protects other groups without causing a breakdown in society.

Just some food for thought. by Orangutan in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Depends how many you want.

Most scientists entered the field out of interest in science, delight of discovery and desire to learn. It'd be pretty hard to buy many of them. You could find a few.

There's probably some idealistic politicians in local body politics and the young, but a career politician is going to be pretty good at appealing to donors, especially in the US where advertising spend has such a impact.

Slippery Slope by Tarrock in politics

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He was obviously imprisoned solely for offending the politically correct judge by using female pronouns.

I'm not sure that that's a jailable offence.

The vancouver sun articles say that he was jailed for contempt of court after repeatedly violating the court order not to identify his wife, child and healthcare providers.

This makes more sense, since you can get jailed for contempt of court.

Senator Rand Paul weighed in Tuesday following a Monday bombshell from The Intercept which revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci's NIAID and its parent, the NIH, funded Gain-of-Function research in Wuhan, China. Recall that Fauci called Paul a 'liar' for accusing him of funding the risky research. by Chipit in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You just presented a complete inversion of reality.

This from the guy who claims that Oxford Vaccine Group are manipulating the papers published in "Clinical Infectious Diseases", to protect "billions of dollars" that they aren't making.

Certainly one of us is presenting an inversion of reality.

hectoring me with your smarmy insane corporate narrative

If you stop lying to yourself, the truth will stop irritating you.

Senator Rand Paul weighed in Tuesday following a Monday bombshell from The Intercept which revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci's NIAID and its parent, the NIH, funded Gain-of-Function research in Wuhan, China. Recall that Fauci called Paul a 'liar' for accusing him of funding the risky research. by Chipit in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Facui didn't commit a felony.

The projects were reviewed by both the NIH and the University of North Carolina biosafety committee, and determined to be okay. Which means not meet the definition of "gain of function".

So you're going to draw a long bow to prove that Fauci is lying.

Senator Rand Paul weighed in Tuesday following a Monday bombshell from The Intercept which revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci's NIAID and its parent, the NIH, funded Gain-of-Function research in Wuhan, China. Recall that Fauci called Paul a 'liar' for accusing him of funding the risky research. by Chipit in news

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anthony Fauci is a high functioning narcissistic psychopath.

Ironic from someone who's as disingenuous as yourself when you're spreading dangerous misinformation about vaccines.

People really need to realize this. You have to be asleep not to see it.

He's trying to save lives. You're trying to get people to take risks with theirs.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You sound pathetically manic.

I take it you've got no response to the facts then?

You falsely claim that the study was from oxford vaccine group, then you move the goalposts to say that there's a tenuous link with the oxford vaccine group and the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases instead.

Both are dishonest.

To dream up a motivation for the tenuous link, you lie about Oxford making money from the AstraZeneca vaccine.

In amongst a string of misinformation about some "safe and effective treatment options". Presumably the horse paste in the OP that is killing conserveniuses at a slower but more avoidable rate than COVID.

The thing about arguments that you have to lie to support? They don't stand on their own.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So Oxford cherry picked some studies

For fuck's sake! When you say "a study from Oxford", you mean that the paper was published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which is published by Oxford University Press, and that's a department of Oxford University, and the Oxford Vaccine Group is within the Department of Paediatrics also at the Oxford University.

So your claim is that the OVG put pressure on the Department of Paediatrics to put pressure on the University to pressure the Oxford university press to manipulate their peer review process so that a meta-analysis demonstrating that Ivermectin is ineffective is published despite having flaws. That you don't name.

Why don't you say that instead of these fucking oblique hints? You think people have time to sift through your bullshit to try to work out what you might mean like a fucking crossword?

It's a long bow to draw, and the failure to find effectiveness in treatment of covid with ivermectin is pretty universal. If you think the study is flawed, point out the flaw that the peer reviewers were pressured to overlook. That's less batshit crazy than your "Oxford University" link.

to protect the narrative that the poison “vaccine”

WRONG. the vaccine is not poison.

making the institution billions

WRONG astrazeneca is not making any money. They have pledged not to make a profit off the vaccine during the pandemic. That's why Oxford Astrazeneca is $4 per shot and something like Moderna is in the $25-$35 dollar range.

is a safe or even reasonable option

WRONG. The paper does not look at the safety of the AZ vaccine.

while the safe

WRONG. people are dying of ivermectin overdoses.

and effective treatment options are downplayed mightily

WRONG. Ivermectin has not be found effective by anyone. hydroxychloroquine has now been found unsafe and ineffective. As was remdesivir before that. And ritonavir makes for worse outcomes too.

There's a long list of ineffective treatments that you anti-vaxers have been killing people with. Ivermectin is just the latest. You'll find others next.

Now why don’t you post a link of studies collected by Pfizer or Moderna because people will find it just as trustworthy.

Let's be clear:

1) You said that the study was from Oxford University. You lied. You moving the goalposts to "published by" is dishonest.

So the question still stands. Were you mistaken or dishonest?

2) Clinical Infectious Diseases has a history going back 42 years, and according to Journal Citation Reports, is the 9th most prestigious of 148 immunology journals that they rank. Pfizer nor BoiNTec nor Moderna nor the NIAID don't have an academic publishing group with prestige and history.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you think caring about people and about society is vile, you're a sociopath.

Why They Let Terrorists In (And Why They Keep Them In) by DanMcGlashan in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Efforts had been made to deport him, but the New Zealand Government insisted he stay.

Not exactly.

It was the New Zealand Government that made the efforts to deport him. But his lawyer argued that he should be a protected person, which protects him from being sent home to a country where he might face torture or persecution.

New Zealand law recognises some refugees as protected person in accordance with international agreements including the UNHCR Convention.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When you create another life, or an embryo, in my opinion you certainly are obligated, unlike a person you had no part in creating.

Does it matter if you were raped?

Again, you're arguing from a perspective that an embryo is not a human life. Without an agreement on that aspect, all of this other talk is moot.

Okay, we can investigate that if you want.

The reason that a human life is more important than a bacterial life, is because of what a human feels. A bacteria has no concept of its life, no fear, no hopes, no dreams, no desires as such, and as such we don't care if it dies.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You’re still here? Are you getting paid or just an obsessive?

Your last two comments at least were that you're not going to continue this conversation.

So this question seems a little ironic. I'm not getting paid. Perhaps I'm obsessive.

Why are you still here?

Now stop putting words in my mouth

Why don't you try then.

You claimed in your "insightful" post that:

Oh look a study from Oxford the creators of the "rare" blood clot causing Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 "vaccine"!

The author affiliations of the paper in the post you reply to are:

1) Health Outcomes, Policy, and Evidence Synthesis (HOPES) Group, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut, USA (2 Authors)
2) Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru Centro de Investigación, Instituto Peruano de Oncología y Radioterapia, San Isidro, Lima, Peru
3) Cello Health, Yardley, Pennsylvania, USA
4) Unidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis, Guías de Práctica Clínica y Evaluaciones de Tecnologías Sanitarias (URSIGET), Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, La Molina, Lima, Peru
and
5) Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

You will have noticed by now, that none of those are the Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

So, in your own words, were you mistaken or disingenuous when you made that post?
And now, having been asked about it about a dozen times, and not retracting your misinformation, are you being disingenuous or merely too egotistical to be able to face your errors honestly?

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That a person isn't obligated to feed even a person that they have nothing to do with.

It's certainly nice.

But when it's not a person, there's no obligation. When giving them food takes from your own health and mental well-being, the lack of obligation is a no brainer.

But if you do want to argue that someone is obligated to keep a fetus alive despite their own health, and give birth to it in pain, surely it follows that we as people with some excess resources are obligated to stop real actual living people from starvation.

I mean they're actual people, and you're arguing that we have an obligation to suffer to support the lives of not-yet-people that we have no interest in.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's bullshit, if someone killed you as an embryo you still wouldn't exist.

There's a couple or few hundred million sperm in the ejaculation that fertilised the egg that grew into me. A couple or few hundred million might have grown into people that don't exist.

All "murdered" according to you, simply because they don't now exist.

You should get 200,000,000 life sentences, just for ejaculating?

No?

Then don't sweat about things that are only potentially people: Not all genetic combinations get to exist. The vast majority don't. Worry about people that do exist. Like raped teen girls and neglected or hungry children.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not trying to kick a dead horse here, but fuck, it would become human life.

At some point, and all things going well, it would. But when it clearly isn't there's no need to finger some poor child to give of their health and welfare, and further have their body subjected to the will of a rapist.

You're a smart guy. I don't think I need to argue with you, I think now you're going to work it out on your own and come to the rather obvious conclusion.

Mate, I've given it thought. Human cells without a brain is not a human. It's doesn't want anything, much less a chance of a life of neglect and hatred and crime. A human's welfare comes first. A mother's body is hers to give to the people she loves, and to withhold from those that she does not. If that unloved fetus has no brain yet, there's no other consideration.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again you're still upset.

I hope that you realise why at some point.

I told you are a disingenuous piece of shit.

Oh the irony.

Your comment was that the papers I linked to were from the Oxford Vaccine Group.

You are sticking to this lie, and appear to be throwing insults in order to take the thread away from your dishonesty.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A tree starts its life as a seed.

Some people would say that the seed is already living. And that a dead seed won't grow into a tree.

If you tore out a freshly planted seed that has begun to sprout, you killed an unborn tree.

Trees aren't born.

Birth is something only viviparous animals do.

You are vile.

Caring about people more than a few cells isn't vile. It's caring.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But not for not taking food to them?

A clump of cells will die if you don't pass nutrients and oxygen to it from your body, unless its about halfway through the pregnancy, and even then it's touch and go with the best tech available.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You seem upset, I'm okay with that.

You're calling me insincere which is wrong. And you're calling me time wasting, when I have provided those two papers from my own googling to you for free.

Perhaps you realise that you were incorrect about the source of them, and you're not the sort of person who says "I was mistaken about that, that criticism I raised is invalid". Or perhaps you know that your criticism was invalid, but you raised it anyway because you've got an interest in spreading misinformation.

I'm okay with not knowing, to be honest. Neither redeems you.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another honest question: why do you think researchers have the 14-day rule when dealing with human embryos?

Ethics committees can get a bit overzealous.

For research purposes iirc you can get 8 or 16 cells. So cell division can occur 3 or 4 times. That was chosen because all the cells are still embryonic stem cells. There's no differentiation between the cells. So augments about whether it's human yet or not can't even begin, because there's no different parts. Just a cell clump.

No, but again, where does life begin and you allow a murder on top of someone committing a rape?

"Murder" is a bit strong for "choosing not to get involved in supporting the life of".

9 million people due from hunger each year. Did those of us who have the resources to feed at least one of them murder them?

But I agree it matters where life begins. Not because some innocent person could ethically be fingered by the state to give of their body to keep a person who they want nothing to do with alive, but because rights must be balanced ... And a clump of cells doesn't have rights.

I guess we should clarify that we are talking about a human life.

Then no. A 2 month old embryo is not human life.

The vaccine is probably the bioweapon that's meant to thin the population by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do try to answer questions that people put to me in these sorts of forums if I think the question is genuine.

Maybe you're mistaking me for someone else.

Yes, you said that I linked to a paper that you claimed was disingenuous because you claimed that it was written by the Oxford Vaccine Group. Nothing in my post was from that part of the world, so I do wonder how you came to think it was from the Oxford Vaccine Group.

Do you think they're attached to a university in the new World?

The vaccine is probably the bioweapon that's meant to thin the population by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes it does. It describes the outcomes of the investigations in the case of Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

Which demonstrates that the investigations happened.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I imagine so. Why not?

Why does Race & IQ differences make people angry, but Gender differences does not? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I realise that it's not a sound refutation.

But I'm still not watching YouTube videos for scholarly information. The signal to noise ratio is to low to expect it to be worthwhile.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Would you say that an embryo is 3/5 of a person?

Nope. A collection of cells with no brain is not a fraction of a human.

I don't know the answer, but I think the heart of this debate is where each person thinks life begins.

Agreed.

I used to be totally pro-choice until I became a father. Now, I don't understand how anyone who is a parent can be pro-choice.

Even when the embryo are a rapists genes, and you want to torture a teenager for nine months while she gives her body to carrying someone who violated her?

I agree that a 2 month old embryo is not the same as a 2 month old baby, but it's still life, in my opinion, and I'm non-religious so that doesn't factor into my beliefs.

A bacteria is life.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Roe vs Wade is dead.

The SCOTUS had allowed a law designed to violate it stand.

The vaccine is probably the bioweapon that's meant to thin the population by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The CDC do investigate the deaths in VAERS.

You said they don't.

But good to see you've come around.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good ol' youtube eh?

What a scholarly source.

Is any of this written down?

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I personally think abortions should not be permitted after the first trimester, because higher brain structures appear between weeks 12 and 16 (and consciousness by week 24).

This is the sensible position that most Americans agree with.

(and with women's lives and rights),

This is the crux of that matter. Horrific punishment of rape victims by forcing them to bring the rapists spawn to term. And breeding more rapists, if there's a genetic component to the propensity to rape.

But Texas republicans' hate is rising against women. Probably related to there being one in the second highest office in the land. Humans have history on this. The witch trials peaked when Elizabeth I was on the English throne.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The most dangerous period of a black person's life is in the womb.

That's true of everyone. Most pregnancies end in miscarriage.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right. But aborting an embryo is not killing an infant.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah. The Satanic Temple have been an important force for good in the battle to maintain separation between church and state.

The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom by carn0ld03 in USnews

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Absolutely do believe in bodily autonomy.

It's the third of their seven fundamental tenets:

I) One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.
II) The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.
III) One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.
IV) The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one's own.
V) Beliefs should conform to one's best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one's beliefs.
VI) People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one's best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.
VII) Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.

Why does Race & IQ differences make people angry, but Gender differences does not? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It used AFQT and NAEP scores.

Is AFQT adult in your book?

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not in the least worried about it.

And I certainly don't see things as black and white. That's something religious people tend to do, because they believe in "evil" as a thing that will pervade all aspects of an entity. And that has motivation.

But I do wonder when you're judging things to be your black-and-white "evil", and so you're certain to find money, what counts as money.

no offense intended.

I'm not offended, but I'm curious if you have a developed concept of what you're talking about, or if you're simply raving like an under-medicated schizophrenic.

No offense intended.

You've put it out there that "Where you find evil, you will always find money". What do you mean by "find money". Or am I mistaken in my belief that you must have meant something?

The vaccine is probably the bioweapon that's meant to thin the population by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They report on the investigations as part of their papers looking at the safety of each vaccine, which often breaks down to various demographics.

For instance, here is the monthly report for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

Under Review of VAERS Data, it describes the further investigations:

CDC and FDA reviewed 88 reports of death after receipt of Janssen COVID-19 vaccine; death certificates were available for 12 (14%). Among the 88 reported decedents, 44 were female, 38 were male, and the sex of six was not reported (Table 1). The median decedent age was 69 years (range = 21–97 years); median interval from vaccination to death was 2 days (range = 0–23 days). All death reports received a medical review§§§; the most frequent preliminary impressions of CDC and FDA reviewers regarding cause of death were 1) decedent found dead, with no additional details available (34 reports); 2) cardiac arrest or cardiovascular disease (23 reports); 3) COVID-19 disease (eight reports); and 4) cerebrovascular disease (five reports). As of most recent follow-up (April 28, 2021), three patients with TTS had died. Among 79 reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination, four were confirmed as anaphylaxis cases after interview with a health care provider or review of medical records (<0.5 cases per 1 million doses administered); four reports remain under review. Headache (34%), fever (34%), chills (33%), injection site pain (26%), and fatigue (24%) were the symptoms most frequently reported to VAERS (Table 1).

The weekly MMWR put out by the CDC includes findings from the investigation of deaths in the VAERS system.

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

where and when you find evil, there you will find money.

Will this money be cash?

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah but, where do you think Oxford is?

Demanding answers to questions while never doing the courtesy of addressing what is asked of you.

I'm sorry if I neglected to answer one of your questions. Which one didn't I address?

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They all think that they have magic, which it turns out, doesn't work on you if you have knowledge.

They all will make the circular argument about believing because you have faith.

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Money as in literal cash? Or assets like a nice house or large church on a decent block of land?

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the Christian bible, it says that money is the root of evil.

Not quite. It says that the love of money is the root of all evil.

Btw, why would you as a muslim quote the author of children's books?

Weird question. Do you think Muslim's don't have children?

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just like every religion then.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So what?

So it is difficult to understand why you're mentioning Russia.

What do you mean by that comment?

People buy fishmox because they don't need a prescription and it's EXACTLY the same as the OVERPRICED pharmaceutical stuff and MUCH CHEAPER.

It's not necessarily exactly the same. It's not regulated or controlled, so unless you've got the facilities to qualitatively test it it could contain anything that's small enough to fit in the pill.

And it's unlikely you're making a sound choice if you're taking antibiotics without a doctor's advice.

But in either case if you're taking fix mox, and a libtard tells you you're taking a fish antibiotic, how upset are you going to be?

It's not really about it being "horse paste".

None the less, it is horse paste.

It's about ivermectin fucking works

It works as a dewormer. Against COVID the main effect is more conserveniuses dying of ivermectin overdoses. And COVID.

and people today are so brainwashed by the media they've all turned into good goy zogbots.

You might be confusing brainwashed with not insane.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Look at you editing your comment to show your intellectual outrage over internet points.

If that's what you'd like to look at. You certainly didn't look at my links before writing your comment.

Why is every leftist propagandist on this site a haughty miserable chapped asshole?

That's cognitive dissonance. You're feeling uncomfortable because you're defending a wrong position with stuff you know to be false. You think you're irritated at the source of the truth because you're irritated when it's there. But this is projecting. You're irritated at yourself.

Yes by all means keep posting narrative garbage

Okay, the question you failed to respond to again:

Which article do you think is from the Oxford Vaccine Group, the horse care one from America, or the scholarly paper from the Americas?

This raises a further question:

Where do you think Oxford is?

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

with every thing you say, you always come across as a complete ass..

On the other hand, it was you who was bringing up the astuteness of your C code.

you should get along just fine as a muslim.

This raises just one question.

What has being comfortable as an adherent to the Islamic faith got to do with "mass hypnosis"?

We Are Witnessing the Greatest Mass Hypnosis of All Time | HypnoMarc by thefirststone in conspiracy

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i am a very astute C language programmer,

Good to hear it from you.

and i firmly suspect that some form of mind control has been used to take over this country of the united states.

Okay. This raises two questions.

The first one derives from the fact that mind control doesn't exist yet:

1) By what mechanism is this mind control exerted?

And the second one derives from your phrasing:

2) What has this suspicion got to do with the astuteness of your C code?

keep in mind that this mind control could very well be something that we have never before experienced.

Well obviously. Since we've never experienced mind control.

if this is the case, then this bullshit will not stop until the entire world is under the control of ONE SINGLE DICTATORSHIP.

if

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which article do you think is from the Oxford Vaccine Group?

The article in the Horse care magazine, overseen by a board of the American Association of Equine Veterinarians?

Or the paper with the lead and corresponding authors from University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, USA, and none of the authors from the Oxford Vaccine Group ... nor Oxford ... nor England ... nor the United Kingdom ... nor Europe?

Edit: OMFSM, someone voted your comment "insightful". FFS.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

WTF are you smoking?

The reason that people are saying it's horse paste is because it's the horse paste formulation that people are using.

Nothing to do with Russia. Nothing generic. Specific and relevant to the post.

What are you talking about?

Science Says IVERMECTIN is A CURE for Covid-19! But it is still being ignored and suppressed by zyxzevn in CorruptScience

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't see your censorship, because you didn't reply to me.

Thanks for making your forum a smaller and less informed place. You must be very proud.

Note: Removed shill comment

Obviously I'm not a shill. Just letting you know that the science is.

Why are you resisting the science so much, with a tendency to call other people shills? Do you have an interest in Merck?

who did not look at the [whole science](c19ivermectin.com).

I linked to a meta-analysis of studies. They were weeded for poor quality and risk of bias.

We know how Ivermectin works, why it works so well, how it works in tests, and how it works in the field.

Yes. The drug binds to glutamate-gated chloride channels that are common to invertebrate nerve and muscle cells. Ivermectin binding pushes these channels open, increasing the flow of chloride ions and hyper-polarizing the cell membranes. This hyperpolarization paralyzes the affected tissue, eventually killing the invertebrate.

Of course this has fucking no effect on a virus, because viruses don't have nerve and muscle cells.

In the field it even gives impressive reduction of the amount of cases and deaths.

Not for COVID. As you can clearly see from the link that you censored.

The mainstream media is still using fake science to help their bosses earn money.

I linked to a scientific paper, not a media report. So this doesn't excuse your censorship of informed opinions.

These vax companies pay most of the media and own many science magazines.

Really?

How much do they pay?

Where are you getting this information?

Big Phrama iis corrupt science.

They don't have a great history. But that doesn't make a dewormer effective against a virus.

I removed direct exposure to these comments to keep the fake science to a minimum,

You certainly didn't do that. I don't know why you censored it, but the science was not fake.

Libtards be like, "It's horse paste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" by [deleted] in whatever

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Conserveniuses have been poisoning themselves using the horse-paste formulation.

It is a de-worming medicine. It can be prescribed to humans, and it is mostly used in a veterinary context.

If you remove low quality studies and studies with some risk of bias in how the results are interpreted, it appears to have no effect on coronavirus infections.

This makes sense, because coronavirus fucking isn't a worm.

Afghan man in Germany stabs woman because she was working by jet199 in Europe

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Several times.

In the throat.

Is Your Child a Far Right Extremist? by Jacinda in memes

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Growing collection of classic literature"

Really? QAnon nutjobs read?

I'd kind of assumed that they got their entire view of the world from fox news.

Appreciation of nation, history and culture

The appreciate nation, and try to organise a coup?

Monogamy.

Not so much in the Trump era. More sort of fucking porn stars while your wife is pregnant, importing foreign "glamour" models to fuck and not being able to hold a marriage together. Twice.

The vaccine is probably the bioweapon that's meant to thin the population by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You appear to be mistaken about that.

Australian Discovers The Vaccines Coerced By Government Have Killed 9 Times As Many Aussies This Year Than COVID by x0x7 in videos

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And the covid deaths are accurate?

Depends on the country. As you get away from the first world, there aren't the testing resources available, so there are vast under-counts.

In the case of Australia, they'll be pretty good.

Both are ball parks,

The database from members of the public and health professionals for possible cases is not in the ballpark of the deaths due to the vaccine.

The number of vaccine deaths according to the TGA in Australia is 9.

If anything vaccine adverse reactions are going to be under reported but to come to a conclusion different than the video you would need an over reporting factor of 8:1.

Not even close.

1039 deaths from COVID, 9 deaths from the vaccine. Not 8:1 the ratio is 1:115

If anything vaccine adverse reactions are going to be under reported

Clearly not. The TGA reviews all deaths in people who have received the vaccine. Only 9 so far of the 495 reports were due to the adverse effects of the vaccine.

And the example I gave you there was generous in assuming the opposite of reality that the error in covid deaths would be under reporting. We know the exact opposite is the case

I don't know that.

How do you know that?

given how they measure a covid death.

That that is measured according to this definition. "A COVID-19 death is defined for surveillance purposes as a death in a confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID-19 (e.g. trauma). There should be no period of complete recovery from COVID-19 between illness and death. Where a Coroner’s report is available, these findings are to be observed." - Source

Why would that over-count necessarily? It seems to me that there would be unconfirmed cases in regional and remote Australia that would be under-counted. And there would be deaths from an undentified cause in a person who is simultaneously ill with a COVID-19 infection that would result in an over-count. It's not obvious to me that one or the other would dominate.