use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
It's All Politics
California is a Failed State.
submitted 14 days ago by Questionable from reddit.com
[–]Karce33 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 13 days ago (0 children)
It's not a failed state it's exactly the communist Utopia that never works out.
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 14 days ago* (0 children)
It is what those people want. They voted for it.
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (29 children)
As usual with your posts, this is - of couorse - BULLSHIT.
CA is not a failed state because it worked on it's homeless problem.
The linked "Breaking911" entirely trustworthy, very well informed, totally honest "news" source is also - surprise surprise - bullshit. Merely search for: California 24 billion homelessness , and you'll see that CA knows where the money was spent BECAUSE OF AN AUDIT, and discovered merely that they didn't consistently track outcomes.
Whoop-dee fucking-doo
[–]topiary2 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - 14 days ago (1 child)
Retard. Stop sucking leftist cock. I know they pay you quite well with OUR money, but we all see through the lies.
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 13 days ago (0 children)
'We' know that you've failed so miserably in everything that you find solace only in your belief in schizo dumbass lies in far right social media, because you're so incredibly stupid. For example I know that you will have no ability whatsoever to point out specifically which one of my comments are lies while using relevant arguments and evidence, or that I would be paid with your money, or who 'they' are, or who 'we' are, or the retard bit. Moron.
[–]Questionable[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - 14 days ago (7 children)
So, I am to trust you, not them?
Got it.
[–]GuyWhite 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - 14 days ago* (0 children)
You can’t trust what you see with your own eyes. You can only trust what they tell you.😉
In another post, I noted that the price of gas when Trump left office was $2.13/gal. Under Biden, gas was $3.10 the day of the post. This shill claimed I was lying.
That was a set-up. Of course, the price of gas and food under the different presidents is something everyone knows; without watching fake news. So there is no way an honest person can disagree. But a liar like u/yomamma still lied and gave itself away.
https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/cjkt/wholesale_inflation_jumps_to_highest_level_since/15t1n
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (5 children)
Re-read my comment or have someone explain it to you
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 14 days ago (3 children)
OH. So now I am to have someone else tell me why I am to trust you?
That's a bit confusing. Why would I do that?
Are you telling me that I can't trust you?
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (2 children)
If you don't understand what you're posting, don't.
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - 14 days ago (1 child)
OK. I won't post anything that I don't understand.
Solid advice. Thanks! 🐸
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 14 days ago (0 children)
👍🏻
[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (0 children)
😂
[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 13 days ago (1 child)
How many 🤡🤡🤡 like you fit in a VW beetle? You do realize that no one listens to you right?
You're obviously obsessed with me.
Try making an argument about the topic, followed with evidence, OK IDIOT?
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 14 days ago (8 children)
they didn’t track outcomes.
😂 So they know where they spent it. They just don’t know if they got anything for $ 24 billion.
😆🤡
[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (7 children)
NO
they didn't consistently track outcomes.
Which would be true in ALL audits about massive projects that cost $24 billion over 5 years, becase of different methods and processes for each outcome measure. The most important part of the audit - in my view - is that there was potential fraud in the management of conflicts of interest and the overpayment of salaries, which might now be under investigation. The audit will have been helpful if this is one of the results.
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 14 days ago (4 children)
But, it’s okay with you that they didn’t get anything for their money? 🤡
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 13 days ago (3 children)
Why are you making dumb comments, followed by a clown face? Trolling? They know what they got, due to the audit.
[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 13 days ago (2 children)
They got a huge increase in homelessness for their money apparently 🤡🤡🤡 Typical of a failed state.
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 13 days ago (1 child)
No, IDIOT, the audit did not cause homelessness.
[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 13 days ago (0 children)
Wow, sorry I didn't realize I was talking to an actual retard.
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun - 14 days ago (1 child)
I get it
It's settled then. Enough said. 🇺🇸
[–]rodmanii 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 13 days ago (2 children)
butthurt democrat bitch is butthurt
fuck off, retarded troll
[–]rodmanii 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 13 days ago (0 children)
eat shit gavin
[–]PsychoTranyRedditMod 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (4 children)
Can you tell me more about this 24 billion homeless?
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (3 children)
search: California 24 billion homelessness
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - 14 days ago (2 children)
California 24 billion homelessness
I'm confused. I did what you told me to do, and the results go against everything you are saying in this thread:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=California+24+billion+homelessness&t=ffab&ia=web
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 14 days ago (1 child)
I'm confused.
Agreed.
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 14 days ago (0 children)
So, you going to help me to understand? You said I should ask someone to explain things to me. And so I did. I asked you.
halp!
that shithole should burn in flames with all the human garbage it contains
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 12 days ago (12 children)
Gee, that failed state would be the world's 6th largest economy if it was an independent country, and is 50% high GDP than the next state (Texas).
It pays more federal tax than it receives in federal funding.
If all US states could fail like California, the federal government would have a surplus, and the country would be an economic powerhouse.
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 12 days ago (11 children)
GDP is not an accurate barometer for prosperity. It just means that they are throwing more money around. Which proves the premise of this thread.
The homeless population per capita in Texas was 81 people for every 100,000 residents, compared to California’s 439 people.
💵
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 12 days ago* (10 children)
GDP is not an accurate barometer for prosperity.
No, it's a proxy. California does earn a lot of money though. And they pay their way, and covering the arse of those failed states. For every $1 paid in taxes, New Mexico gets $3.26 in federal funding. That's failure.
Homeless population per capita is not an accurate barometer for failure of a state. It just means more people want to be there than there is available housing. Which refutes the premise of this thread.
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 12 days ago* (9 children)
You are counting success in dollars, where I am counting it in the quality of human lives.
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 days ago (8 children)
How does California do on your counting, compared to the other states?
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 11 days ago (7 children)
https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/ckh9/california_is_a_failed_state/15u5u
🔁
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 days ago (6 children)
So your standard of "quality of human lives" is on one metric, which is proportion homeless?
You don't care about civil rights, democratic rights, education, nutritarian, access to drinking water or anything like that?
Why not?
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 11 days ago (5 children)
Clearly it's because I am a bad person. Oh, and because the topic was Homelessness. 🆗
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 days ago (4 children)
The topic was a failed state. You were trying to drag that round to "quality of human lives" because "financially propping up the actual failed states" is what Cali is doing.
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 11 days ago (3 children)
Of course. I will let you decide the topic of my thread. This is your thread now. Big win! Much wow!
This is a California Utopia thread now! 🥳
[–]gloomy_bearAnarchist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 12 days ago (0 children)
You would never pay me to live in that shit hole state (and I live in a small shit hole Midwestern town)
[–]Karce33 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (29 children)
[–]topiary2 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - (7 children)
[–]GuyWhite 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (3 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - (1 child)
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (1 child)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (8 children)
[–]YoMamma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun - (1 child)
[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]rodmanii 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]rodmanii 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]PsychoTranyRedditMod 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun - (2 children)
[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Questionable[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]rodmanii 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (12 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (11 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (10 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (9 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (7 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]gloomy_bearAnarchist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)