To all of you trans ladies out there by AdmiralPangolin in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 62 insightful - 2 fun62 insightful - 1 fun63 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Some of them, including YouTubers Blaire White and Rose of Dawn, have done a great job standing up against TRAs.

Trans women face potential women’s rugby ban over safety concerns by Echoofmiles in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 33 insightful - 3 fun33 insightful - 2 fun34 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

In the last paragraph, the article inconsistently refers to trans men as trans males in comparison to males. Trans men are female, of course. This confusion is another consequence of the linguistic muddle promoted by TRAs in an attempt erase any language that might contradict them. Newspeak, anyone?

TRAs were angry when r/gendercritical existed. Now they're mad s/gendercritical exists. It's almost like banning subs doesn't delete people from existence by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 31 insightful - 1 fun31 insightful - 0 fun32 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Many trans people are harmed by the actions of TRAs, which are eroding the public image of trans people. Dissenting trans people lost our subs too. We were not prepared at all for the bans. Much respect for GC demonstrating the futility of censorship.

To all of you trans ladies out there by AdmiralPangolin in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My view on validation is that those seeking it need to find not validation but an understanding of their need for it.

The infuriating rise of anti science behavior in every corner of society. by Bogos in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is also evidence that masks reduce inoculum size, that is, droplets that get through are smaller, resulting in less severe disease because the immune system has longer to mount a defence.

The infuriating rise of anti science behavior in every corner of society. by Bogos in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is some medical evidence that many people with mild or asymptomatic disease have permanent subclinical lung damage. Countries with widespread infection may face a large future health burden.

Just so you know, there's a new sub on Reddit called r/gendercriticalsociety by please_help in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Already set to private, which is a common prelude to a ban, typically while mods fight in vain to save their sub. We have seen this all before.

QT: Even by your own beliefs, sexuality can't be based on "gender identity" by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I think that, for many if not most people, sexual attraction is based on sex not gender. Those for whom sexual orientation is based on gender have no place attacking those for whom it is based on sex, or vice versa.

How can you tell if someone is expressing their actual gender identity? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because gender identity is entirely subjective, it is not possible to determine whether reports of gender identity are true or false.

GC: Which of the most popular social media websites is the most tolerant of GC views? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The banwave has instilled fear in mods, who now feel compelled to remove even the most innocuous comments or risk their sub being banned. Chilling effects far beyond the original bans.

Why is the trans thing EVERYWHERE on the Internet now?? by RedditHatesLesbians in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hint: "np" Reddit links prevent participation. Just replace "www" with "np".

If you can’t accept that people have opinions other than your own, you’re going to alienate every group and end up alone by RoundFrog in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know another trans person who is afraid to come out, not because of transphobia, but because of the stigma of being associated with TRAs.

There is no way BBC just did this... by SNCA_Furweeb in whatever

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

I came here to mention Scottish speakers of English. George Bernard Shaw once quipped that the United States and Great Britain were divided by a common language. The same applies to regional dialects, not to mention Seth Efrica, Straya, and Nuzilnd.

Just so you know, there's a new sub on Reddit called r/gendercriticalsociety by please_help in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That sub has been set to private. There is a post on r/AHS calling it a ban evasion sub, #6 on the AHS home page.

All: Why do a lot of trans people insist that being non binary or trans has nothing to to with stereotyoes, and then suddenly it really is about stereotypes? by questioningtw in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Most of these stereotypes are about gender expression, not gender identity. I am male and pretty much masculine gender conforming. I am nonbinary because my gender self-image does not match my sex, causing gender dysphoria, which I treated with surgical transition. I do not see how I am breaking a stereotype.

My theory is that social gender roles emerge from biological sex differences, and there is something innate that causes most humans to latch on to one binary gender identity in early childhood. Those that do not latch on to the gender identity associated with their sex are trans.

QT: Where are the “trans men” athletes winning against men? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Handicapping based on age/height/weight/past-performance is one way to include trans people in competitive sport. Masters games already has classes. Current testosterone levels are only one part of a much broader picture.

Losing respect for content creators who support the trans narrative by Depressed in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I was already rolling my eyes but I had to close the tab completely when he said "nonbinary people are interesting by default." No. No they are not.

Am nonbinary. Can confirm. Any character whose gender identity is the most interesting thing about them is going to be dull, dull, dull. Same is true in real life.

GC (but anyone can comment): Why are women more supportive of trans rights than men? by Genderbender in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree. Cis men lack the experience of living in a female body, but I know many kind and empathic cis men.

Trans people: Do you feel welcomed by the current trans movement? by Rae in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel welcomed by the trans community in general, but my opinions often attract hostile responses from trans ideologues, and even threats.

  • I believe that sex is binary and immutable; some trans people change sex characteristics.
  • I support freedom of speech, like to hear opinions that differ from mine, and oppose deplatforming.
  • I do not accept or provide validation.

I have been called a TERF, and told that my views on the binary and immutable nature of sex reflect internalised transphobia. The worst hostility I have received is from other nonbinary people, especially "they/them+antifascist" types. Most trans people are chill. The nasty ones self-identify as community leaders and give the rest of us a bad name.

If you can’t accept that people have opinions other than your own, you’re going to alienate every group and end up alone by RoundFrog in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to TRAs, we have "internalised transphobia". I am not GC, but we loathe the same people.

The infuriating rise of anti science behavior in every corner of society. by Bogos in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The placebo effect is real. Placebos have a place where evidence-based medicine is ineffective or has intolerable side-effects.

What's the moral difference between a cake shop refusing to make a wedding cake for same-sex couples vs a business refusing to call someone the name and pronoun they want? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Masterpiece did not refuse all service, just the custom writing. The offered other products. The Supreme Court found in their favour.

Maya Forstater: ‘I am fighting for the right to say men can never be women’ by BiologyIsReal in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I, as a hard atheist, can work with a young-earth creationist manager, who thinks that I am going to hell because I am not saved, to successfully deliver multimillion dollar projects, there is absolutely no reason why trans people such as myself cannot work with gender critical feminists. Even though I disagree with some of Maya Forstater's opinions, I support her right to hold and express her views. The more I read of her writing, the more I like her. Workplace safetyism is illiberal and corrosive. I really hope the unjust judgement against Maya is overturned.

My TRA friend: "JK Rowling's speech is on the same spectrum as the murder of Transwomen" by Vari4 in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Affirming the consequent is the formal fallacy of inferring that, because A implies B, B then implies A. For example, it is false to infer that, because dogs have four legs, animals with four legs are all dogs. Tiger will not fetch.

In this case, the fallacy is to infer that, because "X hates trans people" implies "X disagrees with trans ideology", then "X disagrees with trans ideology" implies "X hates trans people". This fallacy is being used to smear and silence people who disagree with trans ideology, including some trans people.

GC: What are the true definitions of male and female that do not exclude people that have removed all of their genitals and/or can't produce sperm or egg? And why doesn't sex change when secondary sexual characteristics change? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Leonard Sax estimates that the true prevalence of intersex is [...] about 0.018%, which would mean 99.982% are not. Many intersex activists are super annoyed with trans activist appropriation of their cause.

Femboy hooters on saidit when? by Tortoise in LGBT

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Saidit Terms and Conditions:

2. No pornography.

They are still trying to delete/silence us, right here on Saidit. by Lilith_Fair in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Patreon censors. Many prominent culture warriors switched to SubscribeStar after being banned from Patreon for their views (even views expressed on other platforms), often under pressure from Visa/Mastercard, who were under pressure from Sleeping Giants. Many others switched in protest against Patreon's bans.

TRAs were angry when r/gendercritical existed. Now they're mad s/gendercritical exists. It's almost like banning subs doesn't delete people from existence by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am hoping that science-denying ideologies are self-limiting because there is a limit to the pool of available imbeciles, but I fear that I am overly optimistic.

TRAs were angry when r/gendercritical existed. Now they're mad s/gendercritical exists. It's almost like banning subs doesn't delete people from existence by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I did get one commenter on r/asktransgender to admit that trans women were "not canonically female". Nonbinary people seem more open to acknowledging the reality and immutability of the sex binary; maybe that is why I do? Is biology denial stronger amongst binary trans?

Be nice! by Camberian in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Social media echo chambers enforce mollycoddling with the threat of exclusion. I am shocked how many young adults are intolerant of any form of dissent. Not only do they demand validation for themselves, they demand validation for others to demonstrate their own virtue.

TERF apparently doesn't know what HRT or SRS do by theachan in GenderCynical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, trans people do not change sex, only sex characteristics (and not all change these). This is one reason why we now use the term transgender rather than transsexual.

QT/trans: What makes you want to be involved in the debate or advocating for trans rights? What would need to be achieved to make you stop? by peakingatthemoment in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Freedom of expression is my primary concern. I want trans rights activists to stop trying to silence those with dissenting views. Trans rights are human rights, but no one can use the human rights of one group as an excuse to destroy the human rights of others. I especially want trans rights activists to stop denying existence of biological sex because denying reality makes trans people look like loons. We are also not perpetual victims.

QT: Why is bigoted/violence to misgender someone, but mandatory to missex them? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is one of my major objections to the trans activist narrative. Trans people cannot change sex (by which I mean biological sex), only some sex characteristics. Claiming otherwise does not make sense. We do not have the technology. Not only does this claim make us look like loons, it makes it impossible to explain, for example, nonbinary lesbians, and suggests that trans people who do not physically transition are not trans because they do not change sex. I think the problem arises because many people use the term "sex" to mean social sex, that is, gender.

  • Biological sex: binary* and immutable (but some sex characteristics can be changed with surgery and/or hormones).

  • Gender identity: entirely subjective.

* Except for a tiny number of people with disorders of sexual development.

Newsreader Ordered to Pay $10000 to a TiM for Liking Offensive Facebook Comments by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

While there is no legislated right to free speech, the High Court of Australia has found that there is an implied right to freedom of political communication, primarily from sections 7 and 24 of the Constitution. However, it takes deep pockets to seek a judicial review of an administrative tribunal decision.

GC: Do you believe women who voluntarily prostitute themselves should go to jail or be charged? by Genderbender in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This model is a failure because it causes secrecy. It was imposed on sex workers. By comparison, New Zealand's 2003 decriminalisation is a great success because it was led by sex workers. See my other comment.

Trans people: Do you feel welcomed by the current trans movement? by Rae in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think access to women's spaces should be determined by living full time as a woman or feminine person; identity alone is not enough. Self-ID becomes a non-issue if applied only to identity documents. We do not have guards outside bathrooms checking identity documents.

I agree entirely with your aversion to those who claim to have authoritative new meanings for words. They are attempting to control thought by controlling language. Trans activists do not want to hear honest opinions: they want ideological compliance.

A new place on reddit for the Right leaning LGBT community. by Abigailtaylor2019 in RightWingLGBT

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If Reddit were willing to ban r/uncensoredLGBT, no one is safe.

What do you do when there are trans women you actually like? by ImPiqued1111111 in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Meghan Murphy also interviewed Buck on YouTube.

"he/him lesbians" are driving me mad. by anonymoussapphic in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Never apologise for being a lesbian. Check out s/lesbians, the new home of the banned Reddit community r/truelesbians. Twitter and Reddit are controlled by narrow-minded authoritarian zealots and do not reflect the wider community.

TRAs were angry when r/gendercritical existed. Now they're mad s/gendercritical exists. It's almost like banning subs doesn't delete people from existence by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, the whole oppression olympics is so destructive.

Personality Disorders and Personality Profiles in a Sample of Transgender Individuals Requesting Gender-Affirming Treatments by _UngodlyFruit_ in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No mention of autism spectrum, which would have been nice (ASD is overrepresented in the trans community). Nor complex PTSD (not in DSM-5), which is a differential diagnosis for borderline, and also commonly found in abuse survivors..

GC: If race and ethnicity are social constructs and have no biological basis because humans share most if not all of their genes with each other, how can biological sex be real and not be a social construct? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Australian moral philosopher Peter Singer is famous for his views on the arbitrary nature of divisions between humans and animals, amongst other things.

How can you tell if someone is expressing their actual gender identity? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, they are either true or false. Furthermore, they could be false but the reporter could believe them to be true. There are those who do not understand their gender identity and genuinely believe themselves to be trans when they are not. There are also those who repress their trans identity and believe themselves to cis. Not only do we not know whether someone is being honest, we do not know how much thought they have put into the matter. People are terrible at understanding themselves. Psychotherapy can help, but work is hard and people are frightened and/or lazy.

GC (but anyone can comment): Why are women more supportive of trans rights than men? by Genderbender in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Much of human society is built on the "niceness" of women and their "willingness" to work for little or no pay.

GC (but anyone can comment): Why are women more supportive of trans rights than men? by Genderbender in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well said. Every human being should read your post. I wish I could vote for it 1000 times.

My TRA friend: "JK Rowling's speech is on the same spectrum as the murder of Transwomen" by Vari4 in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Free speech is a human right, and yes, that includes freedom from disproportionate consequences. There are exceptions, including directed speech that causes actual harm, including harassment, bullying, and psychological domestic violence, not to mention incitement to actual violence, but disagreeing is never violence.

GC: If biological sex is just about roles in reproduction, does that mean someone doesn't have a biological sex and isn't a man or a woman if they don't reproduce? And that in the times they do things that don't lead to reproduction, they have no biological sex? by Nohope in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it is an attempt to muddy the waters, to erase our ability to even discuss sex, and prevent any discussion that might undermine their preprepared conclusions that "trans women are women" and that lesbians with "genital preferences" are horrible bigots. Newspeak, anyone?

Both: Do you think increasing time on the internet has contributed to more people identifying themselves as trans/nb etc.? by DistantGlimmer in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Social media may influence trans identification, especially amongst adolescent females. A psychiatrist I spoke with told me that, 10 years ago, 75% of his trans patients were MtF in the 20s, now they are 60% FtM in their teens. A huge shift. Whether it is a social contagion or peer support allowing treatment of previously unmet need, I do not know.

Benjamin A Boyce: The Rise of Unreason | with James Cantor, PhD by catoboros in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Top Canadian sex researcher quits scientific group after being blasted for views on transgender issues by sallytomato in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not even his views: his willingness to discuss the issues. Violence! I will post the Benjamin A Boyce interview.

Both: What are your feelings on BDSM and the sex-positivity movement? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Safe, sane, and consensual. There are many women super-keen on BDSM. Hand wringing denies women their agency.

I always hoped that society would change and women would eventually be free to express their sexuality without fear, but I have to admit that the younger generation have succeeded so much that they now terrify me.

What's the moral difference between a cake shop refusing to make a wedding cake for same-sex couples vs a business refusing to call someone the name and pronoun they want? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Selling a cake is providing a service, refusal of which is discrimination, whereas compelled speech violates the rights of the proprietors. The actual cake case revolved around not the cake, but the custom writing on it, which is why the Supreme Court found in favour of the cake shop.

"he/him lesbians" are driving me mad. by anonymoussapphic in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trancels.

"he/him lesbians" are driving me mad. by anonymoussapphic in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it is awful. Apparently anyone can use any label they like, have it mean what they like, not explain what it means to them, yet still claim that others are misusing those labels, without explaining why. A seething cesspool of hate. Objecting is transphobia.

TERF apparently doesn't know what HRT or SRS do by theachan in GenderCynical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting. I was not there when the switch happened, so I do not know the motivation. I get a lot of rage from the trans community for suggesting that sex is real, binary, and immutable, but it does the trans community no good at all to deny objective biological facts.

Transgender used to be all about gender dysphoria, now it follows a religion-like dogma. by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Freedom of religion includes freedom from religion. Gender identity is entirely subjective, not falsifiable, and thus shares many characteristics with religion. To coexist in a secular society, religious adherents must accept that their faith is not shared by all.

The infuriating rise of anti science behavior in every corner of society. by Bogos in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

None of this explains the massive wave of excess mortality, which is calculated from all causes regardless of comorbidities or diagnosis. It is nothing like a seasonal influenza. Just count the total weekly deaths from all causes and compare to previous years. The impact of coronavirus is clear.

Case fatality rate is not all that high, especially now that we have better treatments (dexamethasone), but coronavirus is much more infectious than influenza so there are many, many more cases and many, many more deaths. Coronavirus is only getting started.

The infuriating rise of anti science behavior in every corner of society. by Bogos in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Morgues are overflowing. Excess mortality is a robust measure immune to testing variations or misdiagnosis. The impact of covid is nothing like any other coronavirus on record.

Anyone come here from r/uncensoredLGBT? by Tortoise in LGBT

[–]catoboros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I also came from uncensored. The totally unjust ban emptied my Reddit inbox. I am more active on Ruqqus +LGBT.

Both: What is the story or meaning behind your username? Why did you choose it? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

cat+ouroboros. Inspired by Styxhexenhammer666's ouroboros avatar on YouTube. I am a cat person and often chase my tail so it seemed apt.

Adult human females theses days by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My first reaction was "is that Sargon?" but there is not enough grey in her beard. ;-)

Femboy hooters on saidit when? by Tortoise in LGBT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is not a legal issue. This is a Saidit T&C issue. Saidit has a general ban on porn of all forms. I am a social libertarian and totally fine with all consenting-adult porn (although I choose to avoid genres that I find eww-that's-not-right). Anyone posting porn on Saidit risks a permanent ban. Saidit's house, Saidit's rules. I like Ruqqus because it is a free-speech platform. Saidit is not a free-speech platform: it is a platform that attempts to improve the quality of debate and reduce domination by cliques by limiting moderator power and imposing moderation transparency.

The trans community is missing the point. We don't hate them. We would absolutely be on their side if they would be rational and respect us by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am willing to compromise. Ideologically rigid TRAs do not represent the entire trans community (if that is even a thing). No one elected them. They appointed themselves. The worst kind of people are overrepresented amongst their ranks.

My physics teacher just announced he’s transgender. by LoganBlade in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mid-20s is the peak age for MtF transition so not all that surprising. ROGD normally describes adolescents transitioning in groups, leading to suspicion of social contagion.

QT: Why are gendered behavioural patterns typically sex-congruent (or rather concordant with their respective gendered socialisation) in trans people? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Appetite for risk seems to be the key factor, and this is sexually dimorphic on average. Everything from average speed of Uber drivers to psychological tests of reactions to smears on towelling. While there is great individual variation, females seem to favour survival (low-risk strategy) while males favour status and are willing to take life-threatening risks to get it. Select for the top extreme in any field and it is full of successful risk-taking males. The unsuccessful risk-taking males are dead or in prison, for the same reason. Pure evolutionary biology: females have to survive to have offspring, whereas males do not.

Sen. Mazie Hirono scolds Amy Coney Barrett for using the term ‘sexual preference’, declining to mention its exclusive use by leftist TRAs to attack people for their orientation by jjdub7 in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know how bad things have gotten when lesbians need the protection of religious fanatics.

GC (but anyone can comment): Why are women more supportive of trans rights than men? by Genderbender in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am in almost total agreement with you, but I also recognise that language is descriptive and not prescriptive, and some trans women use the term lesbian to describe themselves. Some people are attracted to the feminine sex characteristics that some trans women have, and some of those people are women. This is not my experience, and for many including myself, sexual attraction is a primitive instinct tied closely to immutable biological sex. But this is not everyone's experience. It seems strange to call a trans woman attracted to women straight. I am cool with trans women describing themselves as lesbians, but trans women have precisely zero right to demand that cis lesbians find them attractive. Trancel talk of "genital preferences" is homophobia.

QT: What's the difference between a man who says he is a woman & a man who doesn't say he is a woman? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No objective difference. Gender identity is entirely subjective.

ALL: Why do non-binary people need to identify as a different gender to present themselves the way they do and like the things they like? by IceColdLover in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mental illness

Gender dysphoria is a mental disorder.

QT: If someone agreed to compromise with you on everything EXCEPT calling trans women "women" and trans men "men" and share intimate spaces with them, would you be satisfied with this? by IceColdLover in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The last point, access to facilities, is the one to which I would object. Denying transitioned trans women access to women's facilities exposes them to public shaming and risk of violence from haters. There few gender neutral facilities. And how would you enforce these rules?

The one exception, in my view, would be prisons: trans women with a history of violence or intimidation should be segregated in their own wing because they pose a substantial risk to the safety of female prisoners. However, nonviolent offenders, such as those who stole evidence of US military criminality, refused to testify in court, and were imprisoned for contempt, are likely low risk and can be accommodated amongst females. Case-by-case risk assessment by custodial officials.

Just so you know, there's a new sub on Reddit called r/gendercriticalsociety by please_help in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And banned two subs with many active trans participants: rightwingLGBT, and uncensoredLGBT, which was created by someone banned from rightwingLGBT for being too left wing. The real crime was that these were LGBT subs not controlled by the woke cabal.

Just so you know, there's a new sub on Reddit called r/gendercriticalsociety by please_help in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AHS full of crab emoji cancer.

GC: If biological sex is just about roles in reproduction, does that mean someone doesn't have a biological sex and isn't a man or a woman if they don't reproduce? And that in the times they do things that don't lead to reproduction, they have no biological sex? by Nohope in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have never before seen such furious agreement on this sub! All humans, except for a tiny number of intersex people, have one of two immutable binary sexes. Sex does not change with fertility, sexual orientation, or gender identity.

For the record, I am nonbinary, a eunuch and therefore sterile, but still male.

Both: Do you think increasing time on the internet has contributed to more people identifying themselves as trans/nb etc.? by DistantGlimmer in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My feelings were there long before I knew anything about gender. The internet helped me learn more. Eventually I learned about gender identity, DSM-IV-TR Gender Identity Disorder, DSM-5 Gender Dysphoria, and realised that I had a nonbinary transgender identity. The internet did not cause my feelings, which were there before Google. The internet helped me to understand my feelings, name them, and place myself in relation to other transgender people.

Both: Why do people keep saying "biologically a man"? There is a word for that: male. Then there are others that say "biologically male" – um, but that's what male is. What other types of 'male' is there? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I prefer to use female/male to refer only to biological sex, but I recognise that female/male are often used to refer to gender. For example, female/male on identity documents is a social sex (i.e. gender), because if you can change it with a legal document, it is a social construct. Female/male are also more convenient because they do not connote age like woman/girl or man/boy.

Language is messy and our dictionaries are descriptive not prescriptive. There are experts, but no authorities, on the meanings of words, which emerge from use.

Benjamin A Boyce: The Rise of Unreason | with James Cantor, PhD by catoboros in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree wholeheartedly. While I do not agree with all of James Cantor's views, I share his liberal values and welcome honest debate. I am sure that there is a pragmatic middle ground. Extremists are the problem. Cantor is quite pro-trans, but was cancelled for not being a trans extremist. Just awful.

Benjamin A Boyce: Logic & Science: Emotional Violence? | Prelude to an Interview by catoboros in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This prelude to The Rise of Unreason | with James Cantor, PhD contains the email thread.

Both: If you could go back and be born as the opposite sex, would you? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I loved one of my parents, but their narcissism, strongest and most toxic in my other parent, has irreparably damaged me as a human being.

Explanation of non-binary that's not sexist? by bradjohnsonishere2 in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People on the autism spectrum are well overrepresented in the trans community.

Both: How do you feel about this interpretation of gender? by BrNated in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it is exhausting dealing with these TRAs because we do not share a common view of reality.

Femboy hooters on saidit when? by Tortoise in LGBT

[–]catoboros 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Owl images?

"he/him lesbians" are driving me mad. by anonymoussapphic in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Everyone is valid". Except those who acknowledge reality.

"he/him lesbians" are driving me mad. by anonymoussapphic in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am guessing that a he/him lesbian is a same-sex attracted female with a transmasculine gender identity (e.g. trans man). I also see many nonbinary lesbians.

TERF apparently doesn't know what HRT or SRS do by theachan in GenderCynical

[–]catoboros 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, sex is binary and immutable, but gender identity is a different thing, and is entirely subjective.

To all of you trans ladies out there by AdmiralPangolin in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the trans context, validation is asking someone to agree with and support one's own subjective self-image, which they cannot possibly know. Given that gender identity is entirely subjective, it is pointless and futile to seek external validation of it. Anyone who claims to be able to validate the gender identity of another person is telling a white lie. That said, I am trans and not GC, and I respect names and paleopronouns, but do not expect me to deny biological facts.

TRAs were angry when r/gendercritical existed. Now they're mad s/gendercritical exists. It's almost like banning subs doesn't delete people from existence by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

r/rightwingLGBT (banned in the first wave) and and r/uncensoredLGBT (banned in the second wave).

r/rightwingLGBT had some right wing nastiness, but was about two-thirds disaffected liberals moaning about leftists, most of the rest being libertarians, with a few token actual conservatives. Many trans people of all viewpoints and robust debate. Many GC and droptheT types. Anti-trans comments were widely rebutted by the community. No one there liked TRAs at all. It was a great community. This was my top sub. (GC was still my #4 after six months of inactivity, for a handful of posts.) r/rightwingLGBT was banned to protect dissenting trans from ourselves, I guess.

r/uncensoredLGBT was founded by a leftist who was banned from r/rightwingLGBT for being too left wing. Trans inclusive. Completely miquetoast totally uncontroversial sub. The mod brought on a second mod to fend off false flag posts and ensure compliance with the new Reddit rules on "hate" content. This was my home after the first banwave. The ban was totally unexpected and emptied my inbox. I guess it was banned for being an LGBT sub not controlled by the ruling clique. Or my fact-based discussion of why I disagreed with some of JK Rowling's essay but respected her right to free speech. We have reformed on Ruqqus +LGBT.

The infuriating rise of anti science behavior in every corner of society. by Bogos in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not quite. Double-blind studies have shown prayer to have either no effect (if unknown to the object) or be slightly harmful (if known to the object). Cardiac patients, if I recall correctly.

Be nice! by Camberian in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Including moderate and reasonable trans people. We also got our subreddits banned. We are also called transphobic, and worse, by TRAs, just for refusing to deny the existence of biological sex.

The infuriating rise of anti science behavior in every corner of society. by Bogos in GenderCritical

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wonder if this is caused by a safetyist generational culture that discourages contradicting obviously false identity statements, amplified by social media echo chambers in which any dissent runs the risk of exclusion?

Both: Is gender dysphoria a mental illness? & Is being trans a mental illness? by peakingatthemoment in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Gender dysphoria is a mental disorder, the distress experienced by someone with a mismatch between gender identity and biological sex. Transgender identity is part of normal human variation, analogous to homosexual orientation or lefthandedness.

QT: What is the difference between a butch woman and a trans man? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am an old-school liberal, pretty much a social libertarian and economic centrist. I like free speech, democracy, and the middle ground. I am here to help find workable compromises. I trained as a scientist, and am a sceptic, free thinker, atheist, and believe that there is an objective reality that we all share.

I realised over 20 years ago that I was what we now call nonbinary. Last year, I started engaging with the trans community on social media. What a horrible experience. The so-called "trans community" turned out to be a nest of authoritarian extremists who deny biological reality and suppress any dissent. I found out about identitarianism, wokeness, grievance culture, and their pervasive influence on the authoritarian left. I started hanging out on r/rightwinglgbt and r/uncensoredlgbt. I had enough karma on r/gc to edit the wiki. I was shocked when the banwave hit all my favourite subs and cleared out my inbox, so I came here.

GC: What are the true definitions of male and female that do not exclude people that have removed all of their genitals and/or can't produce sperm or egg? And why doesn't sex change when secondary sexual characteristics change? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]catoboros 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, but it is also work noting that there is a wide range of individual variation. Hips and gait are some of the first things my lizard hindbrain notices when sexing someone at a distance, but there are, for example, females with masculine pelvises; see "android pelvis" as an obstetric risk factor (about a quarter of females).

Femboy hooters on saidit when? by Tortoise in LGBT

[–]catoboros 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Owls hoot. If you mean owls, then not porn (except rule 34). If you mean erotic drawings of breasts, then you will be reported for pornography and banned.