Man injected with Bill Gates’s newest Vaccine suddenly thinks Internet Explorer is the best

ctvzbuxr · 2020-05-11T12:00:05+00:00

But I'm using Internet Explorer right n-
Oh my god. It is worse than we thought.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-08T02:43:06+00:00

What in God's holy name are you blathering about?

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-12T00:00:09+00:00

Lmao, this is gold.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-06T00:01:24+00:00

You can't answer yes or no to an either-or question.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-02-17T15:03:04+00:00

Looked like an honorable duel to me.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-15T01:04:34+00:00

We should put them in special camps where they can be taught the error of their ways.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-17T08:24:35+00:00

Sucks when the severed head you're trying to hold up triumphantly has no hair to hold on to. You could go for the ears, but it wouldn't look as cool.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-03T15:48:33+00:00

And this is the man that has influenced our so called capitalist economic system more than any other. Absolute insanity.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-01-23T14:27:42+00:00

Unless there's something I'm missing, it looks like that was completely justified. A big man litearally threatening to kill an old man in an argument, refusing to back off after repeated warnings, and then moving into his personal space. Yeah, he had it coming. Just because those two look ugly and there's a woman crying, doesn't mean they're in the wrong. Also, since other people seem to use this as an opportunity to spill their guts about politics: If those two voted for Trump, good on them. Don't let leftists take away your right to defend yourelf.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-04T17:13:31+00:00

See that gun? The gun did it! Show a picture so everyone knows!

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-02T20:24:45+00:00

All religions have bad aspects about their texts and teachings, because they are ancient institutions from a time that was, by today's standards, barbaric and unscientific. What matters however is how a religious text is interpreted, and how it is lived today. The bible has problematic aspects to it, but christian teachings today for example focus more on the new testament, holding the other cheek, that kind of stuff.
This focus on Judaism as an object of hate is becoming very annoying on this site, and I must say that it discourages me from using Saidit more and more. I don't see western society (or any society) being threatened by jews. Jews have lived in our societies for centuries, contributed to our culture in meaningful ways, and were productive and often very successful members of society. Why can't you just stop obsessing over this stuff?

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T18:25:01+00:00

Ah so one jew said something bad. That must mean all of them are bad! The other jews probably all agreed in the big meeting they had on Saturday anyway. I mean, it's not like white Europeans ever say anything I don't like, right?

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T15:27:06+00:00

Capitalism is based on live and let live, meaning that nobody gets hurt by capitalism. The supposed injustices of capitalism are either a result of nature, or a result of government action, which is arguably not a capitalist institution, since it violates property rights to exist. As a result, free speech is possible in capitslism as there are no victims of the system that could speak out against it (or in the case of limited state campitalism, only relatively few). Only some communists, who are usually upper or middle class yuppies who are larping as oppressed victim classes.
In communism, the system is based on aggression - the property of the productive is stolen and distributed to serve the powerful, poverty and crime are rampant as a result of the catasrophic lack of productivity. Of course such a system would, even in the best scenario, not allow for poeple to tell the truth about their living conditions. Once the revolution is won, there is a small time period where the whealth of the former capitalist society is plundered, in which the supposed success of the revolution is celebrated, and once the revolution runs out of poeple's money, the curtain falls.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-15T03:21:45+00:00

Sure, can we continue with communists, socialists, people who like pineapple on pizza and everyone else I disagree with?

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-10T16:49:11+00:00

Slavery was normal throughout most of human history. War, murder and rape are natural parts of human behavior. That doesn't mean those things are good. Civilization occurs when we tame our nature, control our worst impulses and embrace reason and evidence.
I'm not saying a certain amount of tribalism is not acceptable. I like people who are similar to me. I like the culture and values that I grew up in. I don't want government funded mass immigration, because I want to preserve these things. But it is one thing to want to preserve that which you hold dear, and another to see others as worthless or lower than you. We cannot lift ourselves up by denigrating others. Ethics must come before tribalism, the virtue of a person's character must be more important than the color of their skin. Otherwise, we give in to our darkest impulses, no better than cavemen.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-06-18T12:39:09+00:00

Ah, but we need statues of Marx, who was a racist and a hypocrite and who's ideology was used to justify the mass murder of millions of people.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-06-13T21:54:42+00:00

Struck down by the weight of the history they were trying to destroy. Kind of poetic, although it's a shame they didn't actually kick the bucket.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-05-06T21:50:54+00:00

I can assure you that the people you call out are just as repulsed by your ideology as you are of theirs. Still, even though I disagree with your leftism, I welcome you here. This place is for free exchange of ideas. Any dialogue can only help bring people together.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-02T05:50:14+00:00

AnCap.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-02T05:37:01+00:00

Capitalism is not a system. Capitalism is the result of people engaging in vuluntary interactions. What we have today is not capitalism, but a system built in it's very essence on state coercion. We live in socialism, that is why the remnants of the market are seemingly (but not actually) failing.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-12T10:59:29+00:00

It's not actually that complicated if you reject moral relativism based on secular, universal ethics. You can never want to be raped, because rape must by definition be non-voluntary. Since rape cannot be universally rejected and accepted at the same time, the only universal can be that rape is wrong in all cases. Children can't possibly consent to sexual interaction, because they're not able to fully grasp what they would be consenting to. There you go, problem solved.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-12T00:02:38+00:00

Facts

ctvzbuxr · 2020-02-25T23:05:35+00:00

Well cows don't drop bombs on the middle east.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-02-25T05:06:20+00:00

Of course it's not quite the same as systemic, forced censorship by a totalitarian government. It's an exaggeration to get the point across. Also, just because Reddit is private and doesn't show up at your house doesn't mean everything they do is okay. They claim to be impartial, but they're not. This is false advertising and manipulation of users. Reddit would not be as big if people knew just how one-sided it is, but they still want to use their unjustly maintained reach to influence elections. This is highly immoral behavior. If reddit wants to be partial and censor their content, they should be open and up-front about it, label themselves as a left-wing platform, and nobody in their right mind would complain about it.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-24T11:01:02+00:00

If the last election has shown me anything, it's that change will never come from politics. Trump was the perfect candidate, not because I agreed with everything he said, but becaue he genuinely seemed like an outsider who believed in the things he was saying and talked about things no one else would talk about. And what did we get? A few (insignificant) tax cuts, that's it. Mass immigration continues, welfare continues, gun bans are getting crazier, swamp has not been drained. No wars have been ended, the FED's power has not been limited, tech censorship is getting worse and worse. Either he doesn't want to do it, or he can't. Either way, change will not come from the government. The idea that you can infiltrate the mafia to change the mafia is insane. It remains insane.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-09T18:32:22+00:00

My government, specifically the welfare state that enabled far more of these people to establish themselves here than would be possible otherwise.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-03T20:08:31+00:00

I see a problem with socialsm in America, not with banking or media. Yes, large parts of the media are corrupt, the driving force behind this is socialist/communist doctrin, not jewish doctrin. Yes, the money system is fucked up, that's a result of central banks and government regulation (both socialist concepts, not jewish concepts).
Jews are often very successful in white societies because they have a high average IQ, especially in the verbal area, hence why they often pick influential positions like banking or media. Same reason why Asians often choose engineering, because they have particularly high vial/spacial skills. No conspiracy behind it.
Finding jewish contributions to society and art isn't very hard. Before you make me do a google search, Ayn Rand for example was of jewish origin and she wrote some of the most influential novels of American history (yes, she was an atheist, but jews are a people, not just a religion). I'm sure because you're not a "normie" like me, you spent a lot of time memorizing all the negative examples, but maybe you should look up some of the positives as well.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-03T17:24:32+00:00

To refute an argument, you can either show that the statements made were false, or that the statements made were irrelevant in regards to a certain conclusion.
I showed that the specific text passages that he quoted were irrelvant to the point that we should focus about 112% of our attention on this side on the supposed evils of one small and generally peaceful minority of people, by pointing out that what matters is not the wording of specific religious texts, but rather the implementation of those belief systems in the real world, and by pointing out that all major religions have problematic passages in their religious writing.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-03T17:13:52+00:00

Again, there is a difference between personal taste and ethics.
I can, for example, explain why rape is wrong. You can not want to be raped, because rape implies that the act is involuntary, therefore, in order to accept that rape is morally good, you would have to accept that rape is both bad (as done to you) and good (as done to others) at the same time. That is not a coherent position, and therefore illogical. Therefore, arguing for rape to be ethical is impossible.
You can make the same argument about things like murder, assault, theft, etc. But you cannot make the same argument about trans poeple or polyamory. When it comes to bestiality, animals are not protected by morality the same way a more intelligent creature would be. If it is ok to kill an animal for food, then it is (morally) ok to fuck it (though, again, I find it disgusting and would never encourage it).
The ultimate goal in every person's life is happyness. Happyness is the only goal that we don't persue in order to achieve something else. Some poeple are happy when they hack their penis off. And while I may not agree with this, I do not have the right to stand in the way of their happiness, nor am I in a position to decide for them what makes them happy. I just don't think children should have their mind poisoned by this stuff.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-03T02:06:06+00:00

First of all, I'm not sure what your point is. It seems you're just contradicting me for the point of contradicting.
Second, you seem to be mixing up things that are objectively wrong (grooming children, abortion, cheating), with things may be degenerate, but not necessarily evil (transgenderism, bestiality), and with things that are perfectly natural but don't fit your personal tastes (homosexuality, polyamory). You may want to get that sorted out.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-02T23:07:48+00:00

She said wake up, not indoctrinate.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-29T17:47:04+00:00

It is only real communism if it works, which is why real communism has never been tried.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-21T16:38:04+00:00

Well, the good thing about a wise quote like this is, it usually doesnt matter who said it.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T19:53:53+00:00

No, jews are totally consipring to destroy Europe. They are conspiring with European politicians and business leaders and African immigrants and Chinese communists. It's almost like, I don't know, as if the fact that they're jewish is not the point, more that some people of all races are powerful and/or evil and part of the problem.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-19T18:29:03+00:00

Fuck people who hate others based on their race or origin. Nobody chooses to be born white, jewish, asian, black or whatever else. What matters is our actions and who we are. There is no jewish controversy here. This is a controversy about people wanting to use this platform to spill blatant racism. And let me make one thing clear: There people should still be allowed to speak. But seriously, fuck these people.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-17T11:58:46+00:00

Please let this come through somehow. It would be nice to know that there's a sane place left in the world when my country descends into chaos with the rest.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-15T01:31:28+00:00

And people say Trump isn't good for businesses...

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-14T00:39:04+00:00

Where is this mystical land you speak of? China? No, they value Chinese above anything. Africa? No, actually, most African countries are fairly hostile to white people, as a few South African farmers can probably tell you. The Middle East? Probably not, that's dominated by middle eastern people. South America! No, wait, that can't be it.

I hate to break it to you, but "white" western countries are the only ones that aren't systemically racist to outsiders.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-09T20:36:05+00:00

I agree, it's annoying, but here's the deal: Any free speech platform will also be used by idiots and racists, even Ruqqus will eventually. The only way to get rid of them would be to institute censorship. Problem is, censorship doesn't stop with the people you disagree with the most. It will always spread. We have to stand on principle and just ignore/ riddicule these people. That's the best we can do, because free speech of those we disagree with is the necessary price for our freedom of speech.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-09T20:30:52+00:00

You don't understand. She was married to someone they don't like.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-07T11:08:30+00:00

In other words, the poor and powerless can do no wrong because they are poor and powerless. If the poor and powerless set cars on fire, destroy and occupy infrastructure, loot stores and even kill people, hey that's okay because they're poor and powerless and it's not their fault that the world is how it is, right?
If you are successful in this world though, you are clearly a monster no matter what, and you deserve every bad thing that could ever happened to you.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-01T08:26:35+00:00

"A good rule of thumb for structuring society is to apply the same standards of ethics to a man's wallet as we would to a woman's vagina."
-someone very smart

ctvzbuxr · 2020-06-30T23:43:21+00:00

I disagree. I actually like memes. I like to have fun on social media too. What's wrong with that? There are subs dedicated to certain kinds of content. A political sub should not be full of shitpost. A shitpost sub may not be the right place for serious political discussion. The user can decide which places he wants to be a part of. I have seen lots of political posts on Saidit, but so far I'm not seeing lots of stuff that's fun. Meaning that people who want memes or entertainment will still resort to Reddit. If we want to make this site mainstream, we shouldn't be afraid of going mainstream.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-06-30T05:07:04+00:00

No, the truth is, there are lots of people these days who don't belive property rights exist. These people would, if their ideology was brought to it's logical conclusion, steal the last shirt off your body and not have a shred of remorse about it. We have large portions of the population who are brainwashed by Marxists, who would bring western civilization to the ground. These people would, if they got their way, have you shot dead in the ground if you refused to surrender your means to defend yourself to their government. This is not an artificial divide. We are not people who ultimately want the same thing but are just played against each other. No. Our society is undermined by very evil people who need to be put in their place if we are to survive. That is the truth.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-06-29T16:12:46+00:00

If it was a black guy it would be a racist hate crime.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-06-13T22:09:58+00:00

I mean yes, it isn't freedom. The system is horrible, and we shouldn't have anyone ruling over us in an ideal world. Problem is, the system is in place. It's not going to go away in the next 4 years, because there are too many people believing that choosing the guy who rules you is freedom. And that brings me to my point: This is a very important election, because while the system does suck, there are still much better and worse options when it comes to who is going to rule you. Not only in the next 4 years - if Democrats get in, immigration and censorship might prevent them from losing an election ever again. You cannot create a free society if you import poeple from cultures hostile to freedom faster than you can possibly convert people to freedom.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-05-08T18:53:04+00:00

Politics is not exactly the art of philospohical consistency.
"We need to ban guns, and we give certain people the right to use guns in order to enforce gun bans"
"We prohibit theft, and we will give a few people the right to steal most of people's income, which is then used to enforce our laws"
"Slavery is the worst thing that can ever happen to a human being, but we're gonna lock children up in education camps where they have to do work every day because that's just necessary for society"

ctvzbuxr · 2020-05-07T11:25:35+00:00

Yeah and fuck these people.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-09T07:19:25+00:00

Guess their revolution was over before it began. Very sad.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-04T02:47:16+00:00

Voluntarism means all human interactions must be voluntary. Anarchism means there is no ruler, i.e. nobody who can force his will upon you (except in self-defense). And capitalism means respect for one's property (aka capital), which includes the body - rendering aggression (and thereby coercion) invalid. So, how are those not exactly the same? Anarcho-Capitalism and Voluntarism are just what happens if you let people be free. How such a system will look like, I can't definitively say, but it doesn't matter how you call it.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-03T02:22:42+00:00

Yeah that's... not what I said at all.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-04-02T05:44:47+00:00

But remember, it wasn't real socialsm, because socialism by definiton works so if it doesn't work, it can't be socialism.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-31T00:16:02+00:00

There is only one thing we say to death...

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-28T23:05:28+00:00

Have you tried influencing my brain instead? Since you are so enlightened and above us all, why don't you elaborate on your political views, rather than morally masturbating yourself by talking down on others?

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-28T15:19:16+00:00

The inciting incident for me was that WPD got banned. But I had been pissed off by Reddit's censorship and by the fact that it is just a left-wing echochamber for a while. I found out that WPD moved to Saidit, and followed. Started reading the front page, found out that there's actually interesting stuff on here, made an account so I could post. Saw the potential of this site once more people come here, started suggesting Saidit to other Reddit users.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-24T05:57:03+00:00

The video does indeed show a man, who is in the process of killing a woman. It does not show the woman being killed, though.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-19T17:09:10+00:00

Civil disobedience is the only way to deal with institutionalized madness like this.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-19T09:29:10+00:00

None of these things limit the freedoms of your average citizen in such a way as the quarantines now. I live in Germany, they have started prohibiting people to go out in some places (not even the epicenters of the virus), we have Merkel saying that probably 2/3 of Germans will be infected, we have schools, restaurants, pretty much everything closed down that's not a supermarket. Something like this is quite literally unprecedented.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-19T09:00:30+00:00

Well, yes. The proportions don't seem right. The proportions of response to threat levels I mean. Don't get me wrong, last thing I want to do is downplay the virus. If the official numbers are to be believed at all, it has an enormously high spread rate and could become seasonal, effectively a new worse version of the flu (which would be bad, as it would kill people each year, cause disruptions in the economy, and overall decrease human happyness). But the sheer extremity of the measures taken seems... yeah, out of proportion is the best way to describe it. It seems they are trying to systematically abuse this crisis to limit freedoms and human rights, which calls into question whether this was an accidental release or a planned operation.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-18T18:14:09+00:00

I don't think it's fabricated, I think the virus is something we should take seriously. But yeah, the response by governments has been blown way out of proportion, freedoms are being limited that should never be limited under any circumstances. And they will try to use this crisis to make permanent changes to legislation that limit our freedoms permanently.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-14T01:36:12+00:00

"If a child takes voluntary interest in someone sexually, then you've got a quandary."
That's a pretty big "if", because that would never happen. "Is it moral to have children as wives? Depends on your culture."
No, it does not. No child seriously wants to get married unless heavily pressured. A child can't even know what that means. Any culture that endorses child marriage is degenerate, disgusting and immoral and should never exist.
"and it become obvious when she's pregnant."
Which means there was sex.
"Even in the USA there is Burning Man, Vancouver has a nude beach, etc."
I don't know what any of these things have to do with pedophilia. Children understand that people have a body under their clothes. What they don't understand is sexuality. If you are nude on a nude beach, children understand why you're naked, because it is normal to be nude on a nude beach. If you expose yourself in the streets, it traumatizes them because it's not normal to expose yourself on the streets.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-12T13:09:48+00:00

I mean, I just made an argument for why ethics (=morality) is not dependant on tribes, cultures or individual views. When it comes to children (i.e. people who are not yet in puberty), no, I don't think things are that diverse and individualized either. The part where I admit things could get murky is when we are talking about teenagers. But pedophilia usually refers to small children.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-11T01:59:00+00:00

Oh, so true. You say anything on the internet, people just post some link to an article by some obscure politically biased media outlet, presenting selective data and think they have refuted your position. It would take about 2 Minutes to google and find an article that says the exact opposite. Finding out the truth about something is usually difficult, and requires careful logical evaluation and comparison of different sources.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-07T22:35:55+00:00

If you want to know who really has power over you, look at who you're not allowed to criticize. Considering that, maybe rich people in general are not necessarily who you want to look out for. Perhaps whoever Epstein pissed off. Maybe the mainstream media, until Trump broke their power to some extend. Maybe the Satanist Cabal. Or the IRS. Could be muslim rape gangs if you're in Sweden. Or perhaps the people who ban you on Reddit for having the wrong opinions. It's a tough question.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-03-05T19:29:35+00:00

If swallowed

ctvzbuxr · 2020-02-29T20:07:25+00:00

That's what happens when the same institution who's member is accused of a crime is running the court. It's like if a google employee was accused of a crime and the court was run by google. Absolute insanity.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-02-25T22:57:52+00:00

I didn't say government. Little trivia about me: I'm actually an anarchist. I believe that anything can be resolved without government interference if enough people put their minds to it. That is why I think it's important to establish better platforms such as Saidit, that are dedicated to free speech and will hopefully replace things like Reddit, given enough time. That being said, it's not that simple. Why do you think companies like Reddit are promoting left-wing politics so hard? Because they hope to acquire preferential legislation from the swamp creatures that keeps competition down and secures their monopoly. We are already competing with the power of the state here.

ctvzbuxr · 2021-02-26T19:37:00+00:00

And yet, they wouldn't have any power or authority if not for government. Funny how that works.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-17T12:51:53+00:00

It works once, it works again. Censorship never stops with one thing. This is only the beginning.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-14T19:24:32+00:00

You are correct. Humans can do these things. Animals can not. Just like a criminal is not protected from the law, just like a thief is not protected by property rights, an animal is not protected by morality, because it can not act morally. In order to do that you need the intelligence to conceptualize eithics, which animals lack.
Yes, animals can still suffer. But aversion to suffering is a subjective preference. Personally, even though I prefer that animals are treated well and not abused, I don't care if an animal has to die or suffer so I can eat it. I care about humans in a different way specifically BECAUSE we are different from animals and are capable of acting morally. I don't care about the rights of amoral creatues (human or otherwise), because they don't care about my rights either.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-09T05:55:01+00:00

Yeah I don't know, I don't feel particularly threatened about Jews replacing me. When I look outside (living in Germany), what I see is a bunch of brown people (usually muslims) replacing the native population. I don't see jewish restaurants open at every corner, I don't see videos in Hebrew popping up in my country's youtube trends every time I open the front page. I never heared about a bunch of Jews roaming around molesting or stabbing people. There are no gangs of Jews taking over the underworld/crime scene, to my knowledge. So I don't know this is really something I need to focus on.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-07T04:51:24+00:00

The only thing cooked was the guy hit by lightning, probably. (sarcasm)

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-04T06:30:57+00:00

I'm glad most people don't have that attitude. Because we would still be living in the stone age if they did. Progress is generally a result of trying to make life easier, more pleasurable, to avoid hard work or to gain more of what you desire.
Trying to conquer suffering sounds nice, until you get a major tooth ache - in that case I'm pretty sure most people would prefer to get rid of their suffering by visiting the dentist.
Trying to conquer your suffering is what you do when you have no means to avoid it, or when it is a necessary price for avoiding greater suffering in the future. Every reasonable person lives like that. You live like that. Get off your high horse.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-04T04:35:45+00:00

Don't tell me the funny button isn't a sort-of downvote as well (depending on context). If I see a serious post with 2/3 funny votes I see that as the post being downvoted.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-04T04:10:39+00:00

So you are hoping to be happy in your afterlife, and you act accordingly in your present life, so that you can spend an eternity in bliss. That is very reasonable behavior, if you believe in an afterlife, which I don't. But you are proving my point. Your goal in life is happiness, just like mine. You wake up every day thinking that you will end up in heaven or whatever you believe in, and that makes you happy. If you abandon what you believe is the true purpose in life, you would be miserable because you would wake up every day thinking you would end up sodomized with a trident like us poor sinners.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-04T00:41:17+00:00

I don't know, I don't think I will be very happy when I'm broke on the streets with organ failure. But if you don't want to be happy, then maybe amputate your limbs and blind yourself, that's a sure way to make you miserable for your whole life. And you would make me happy because you can't type stupid shit on the internet anymore.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-03T21:29:25+00:00

"typical jew"
That's not helping your case, I like Ayn Rand and her philosophy, even though we disagree on a few things.
"their religious texts forbid placing interest loans on other jews"
Does that mean the de-valuing of the currency through the federal reserve does not apply to jews? Do you even know what central banks do? Can jews walk into a bank and get interest free loans? Maybe I should become a jew...
"socialist concepts == Jewish Concepts" "Ayn Rand, typical jew"
Yeah, I don't know, something about this doesn't add up...

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-03T19:55:02+00:00

If you think I'm a moral relativist, you haven't read what I said. I made a case for why ethics is objective and universal.
You on the other hand put forward a standard of ethics that is bound to whether something is "life-affirming" or "life-negating", which in turn is a completely subjective standard. And besides, rape can be life-affirming (let's say a woman doesn't want children), that doesn't make it ok. Regarding happiness (yes I know that's how it's spelled, I typed it wrong a few times): Your primary goal is happines too, even if you don't admit it. The things that make you happy may differ from those that me or others happy. You seem to be focusing on long-term happiness a lot more than short-term. You can eat a bowl of sugar and maybe that will make you happy for about 10 Minutes, but it decreases your happiness not long after that. But if you decide not to eat a bowl of sugar, that's because you want to maximize your happiness in the long run, which is a pretty smart strategy. But happiness is by definition that which motivates us to act. If I give a homeless person money, then because it makes me feel good to be charitable. If it made me feel miserable, I wouldn't do it. And neither would you.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-03T12:27:27+00:00

I spent a whole paragraph arguing his points. And I am not threatening anything. I left reddit because it had become an echo chamber. It seems like the same is happening to this site. Every time I open the front page there are 3 anti-jewish memes, and people don't seem to be even trying to say anything about it anymore. Meanwhile, when I speak up about it I'm called insults and and invited to leave.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-02T22:56:00+00:00

Go on.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-08-02T16:08:30+00:00

I'm not a fan of this. I support Trump over his competition, but this will be seen by the general population as an act of censorship. And honestly, I can't help but agree. This is not the way.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-30T23:32:23+00:00

How is (government) health care funded? Taxation. Taxation is a violation of property rights. You are threatening to put people in jail or kill them if they resist, when they don't pay money that they own and have not signed over voluntarily, to fund other people's health care.
There is no such a thing as "that kind of socialism". Every socialist policy has the threat of a gun behind it, and the only reason why we don't see bloodshed is because people usually do not resist, which they would have every right to do.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-30T19:52:28+00:00

I don't think that's what I said. What I said is communism doesn't work. In my opinion, the degree to which a society implements socialist policies is the degree to which it will harm itself. The degree to which property rights are enforced, contracts are upheld and freedom of the individual is implemented is the degree to which a society will prosper.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-26T08:59:54+00:00

I think a direct democracy would be better than what we have, but it would still not be a society based on freedom. It would be a society where everyone has to subjugate himself to the whims of the majority, of the mob. A society based on freedom would mean you can do what you want, as long as you don't limit the freedoms of others (i.e. attack or steal from them). A direct democracy means do what you want as long as it doesn't collide with the interests of the majority. Sometimes, a democracy (direct or otherwise) is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for dinner.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-25T18:51:18+00:00

What an interesting perspective, to view people's property rights as a transitional state.
"Yes, you own that thing you workd hard for, but only as long as we deem it appropriate, and once we decide to have our revolution we will take it from you at a whim, in order to alleviate you from such an antiquated burden."
The truth is, people could already live in socialism right now if they wanted to. Socialists all around the world could put their money in a big pool, govern it as they see fit, and no capitalist in the world would do anything to prevent it. The truth is, capitalists have no problem with socialism either, as long as it's voluntary. But the truth is, voluntary socialism is just another form of capitalism. Capitalism is simply what you get when you let people choose how they govern what is rightfully theirs.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-25T18:40:35+00:00

And how would you do that?

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-25T01:21:47+00:00

I think the only people who should be in prison are those who harm(ed) others. A system that imprisons people for victimless crimes is a system built on injustice.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-24T20:14:33+00:00

Actually, no. "Engineering" society always means forcing your citizens to act in a way that they normally wouldn't, otherwise there would be no point to it. If you think you know better what people should do than any person him-/herself, not only are you being incredibly arrogant, you will only harm people, not help them. Because chances are that most of the time, you don't even know what's best for yourself, let alone others. The best way to organize society is to let people be free.
You think that good and evil do not exist, think again. You don't want to be told what to do by a thereat of force. If you want to be told what to do, force is not necessary. That means you cannot want to force others to conform to your needs, and remain intellectually consistent. Either freedom is for everyone, or for no one. Evil people always want freedom for themselves, but enslave others.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-24T20:03:28+00:00

If only "far right" activists care to protest a brutal gang rape, you know what to expect from the other parties.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-24T19:45:03+00:00

The children who worked during the industrial revolution would have died prior to the industrial revolution, before capitalism raised living standards to a point where most children didn't die as infants, and provided the opportunity to earn their living. Nobody wants children to work in coal mines, but it is preferable to them dying. Their poor living conditions were a condition of nature, counteracted by capitalism. As soon as living standards raised to a point where child labour was rendered obsolete by the market and had fallen largely out of practice, the british govenment prohibited it and claimed that it saved the poor children from the "evil capitalists".
If you think that business owners don't have to work, you are clearly ignorant of how busines works. If it was easy, everyone would do it. 99% of people in business work crazy hours, and the other 1% had such a great idea that they produced enough value in one go that they don't have to work anymore (most of them still do). Not to mention the risk that entrepeneurs take, and all the regulations and taxes they have to deal with already.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T23:03:04+00:00

Oh, I agree with the thing about hatred towards white people being normalized. And your solution is to then go and normalize hatred towards another group of people to equalize the playing field? That's insane. You are literally doing the same thing in reversed.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T21:43:23+00:00

Well, I don't understand why it needs to be pointed out. It's like one of these porn videos that pay unnecessary attention to feet, but are "totally not fetish videos". Yeah yeah, this guy molested children, AND HE'S A JEW, YOU KNOW? It has nothing to do with the fact that he molested children, BUT HE'S A JEW, REMEMBER THAT. God, it's so annoying. Give me a break.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T21:39:46+00:00

I don't know how you define capitalism, I define it as a system that upholds property rights and contracts. If someone wants to violate my property rights (which includes my body), he is not a capitalist.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T21:33:07+00:00

He could have started by not paying the reparations instead. You think he could have said: "Okay, so, you know, we kinda built a strong war machine here, so you can fuck off with your reparations or start another very constly war that nobody knows if you will win it." Or he could have not attacked American civilian vessels in his god complex, and maybe he could have actually won. Or he could have not taken advantage of deeply ingrained racism in the population to blame an entire race of people for the situation of WW1, and maybe history wouldn't judge him as harshly as it does, for, you know, the actual holocaust that happened. Just some ideas here.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T20:11:30+00:00

He started the war. Doesn't mean it's only his fault, but he certainly did a crap job at protecting the interests of his people, didn't he?

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T20:09:12+00:00

If a corporation were to hire mercenaries to control a piece of land that they don't own, that corporation (if successful) would be the government of that land. I want to prevent that. The way to get rid of government is not to install another government.
What you are essentially saying is that a stateless society would be impossible. I disagree. If people can abolish their current government, they can prevent a new government from forming.
There is plenty of libertarian theory on how a stateless society could work, and how violent takeovers would not only be impractical, but outright impossible. I'm not going to go over all of it here, but in short, a company can only make money in the long run if it fullfills the needs of it's customers. And people in general have a desire to not be aggressed against. In other words, there is much more profit (and thus, economic power) in protecting people from aggression, rather than trying to forcefully rule them.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T20:00:29+00:00

So you understand that government doesn't work in practice, but you still defend it in theory. Maybe something is wrong with your theory.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T19:57:54+00:00

And what a great job he did. Only one of the worst genocides in human history was the result of his rhetoric and fascism. I bet those children who died in the concentration camps really had it coming. They would have taken down Europe if not for this great mustache wielding hero. Oh and the people who died in WW2, the German women who got raped by the Russians, yeah, great job Hitler.

ctvzbuxr · 2020-07-20T19:50:18+00:00

So there are corporations and governments, and sometimes corporation bribe governments. And you think the problem are corporations?
Look, corporations are just people working together. They can't do anything any other person can't do. Governments on the other hand are people with the right to initiate the use of force against others. That is the problem right there. These are people who are given extra rights that other people don't have. If a corporation has rights they shouldn't have, those rights are always granted by the state. The problem is always socialism.

ctvzbuxr