Thank you for the documentary. I watched it a few weeks ago, and found it quite interesting. Some of it I agree with, some of it I disagree with.

Yes, that man filming himself screaming 'Alan' or whatever and supposedly claiming that it was for his family to be able to locate him is extremely suspicious. The hearings of a second bomb is also rather suspicious. The picture(s) and video(s) of the Manchester Arena bombing compared to what was supposedly being claimed are in conflict. I also agree that the woman who lied about bringing victims to some hotel (if I remember it correctly) and not facing any supposed consequences for it is suspicious, as well as the fact that just before the supposed bombings, some of the attendees were denied re-entry back into the Arena, suggesting foreknowledge. Furthermore, the lack of CCTV footage released is suspicious (as it is in all terror acts). If U.K. Critical Thinker is correct in stating that the photo of some man with no background was the only photo released purporting to prove that man is the bomber, then he is correct in being suspicious of that.

I don't believe U.K. Critical Thinker raises a valid point when comparing the times the witnesses gave in interviews to the Manchester Police's narrative. If I remember correctly from the clips in the documentary, there was no central clock in the arena, so to get the time, people would look at their own watches and phones, and different watches and phones display somewhat different times. As such it is not suspicious at all that the witnesses gave different times when interviewed, and it's not suspicious that they're different from the police times. In fact, I would find it very suspicious if they all gave the same time for the same event. Furthermore, with regards to the medical staff not being so panicked when seeing the supposedly horrible scene, I do not believe it raises much grounds for suspicion, as they are supposed to be able to handle seeing people in horrible states. Also, supposed victims smiling when being visited and interviewed can possibly be explained by the comfort they felt by other people consoling them. I don't think anyone without serious psychology and neuroscience knowledge would be able to correctly determine an emotion's cause.

By the way, this may just be me failing at basic research, but I'm having issues finding the Manchester Police's narrative/report on this bombing. I can only ever find the Kerslake Report on it. Would you mind sharing it with me please?