SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed.

The site is free to use anonymously, or $1/mo to have a named account? by la_cues in Cassy

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Your critical beer thoughts are always welcome. Cheers.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Many folks on SaidIt are Jekyll & Hyde like them. Popper leans left and BJ leans right, so far as I'm aware. I'd never had a problem with either until that shit.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

sealioning

TIL. Fanfuckingtastic! A perfect term to describe MANY of the trolls on SaidIt.

What to know: Sealioning is a harassment tactic by which a participant in a debate or online discussion pesters the other participant with disingenuous questions under the guise of sincerity, hoping to erode the patience or goodwill of the target to the point where they appear unreasonable. Often, sealioning involved asking for evidence for even basic claims.

The origin of the term.

Thanks for the stats. I'm not sure how accurate they really are, because I fucked up and my OP failed to clearly separate my disdain of their poison pens from their ban-worthy repetitive rule-breaking. (I'm also against banning people with opinions, good and bad.)

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's about the rule breaking, not censorship. It's my fault I wasn't clearer. The fact that they spew poison is bonus if they get removed.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

M7 took on the burden and refused to delegate or find any decent solution, topping it all off by abandoning his duties leaving someone incapable in charge with a deep grudge he instilled in them like a time bomb, unbeknownst to me, thus causing even more drama when I got temp-banned again.

"repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction"

It's the repetition that's critically key - and arbitrary.

There's also some irony in banning only working with with users who aren't assholes.

Perhaps, LOL, I don't know what that says about me, as I've been banned twice, and officially resurrected twice. Maybe I'm the grey area around the asshole if I'm not one directly - or double sized.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you are not perpetually breaking the rules and dragging conversation downward - and thus I won't ever call for you to be banned (unless that changes).

Because you disagree with me I break the rules and drag conversation downward?

Are you being daft on purpose? You directly quoted me, selectively, then you misunderstand me. Read it again and stop shit disturbing.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

BULLSHIT. By selectively editing the title's question into a statement rather than a question, you spin more lies again, as always crying /s/Victimhood. Oi vey. More inauthentic spin. But that is besides the point.

Your perpetual lies, authoritarianism, misinfo, and big pharma shilling are prolific poisons intentionally disrupting SaidIt - but that's secondary and my post failed to clearly distinguish your political infiltrator trolling bullshit from the real issue at hand that will actually get you banned:

We need to deal with your ongoing RULE BREAKING.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

m7 is still avoiding the internet (or at least saidit) because of some of the problems all that drama led to.

Do you know this to be true or is this speculation?

And where do you stop?

Stop where the rules stop. Most of the shills, trolls, commies, and Nazis on SaidIt actually abide by the rules, so for better or worse they can stay, but we can keep watch for when they break the rules - and hope the arbitrary judgement and courage of the admins will take action.

and the list could keep growing.

One storm a week is enough. Next week we can start the list. If SaidIt were to grow then we may need it. A.I., the culture war, and tyranny are also on the rise. Maybe it's a pointless witch hunt. We can take care to keep it fair. More later.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know about arbitrary, but I'm curious to see if this place improves without them.

I didn't know the administrators were banning regular contributing humans.

I don't know what you're talking about.

Yes, fairness is all I ask.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Feel free to vigilante all you want, but saidit won't be officially involved. If you want to maintain a list of shills and try to encourage people to block them, I see no problem. I remain here to act on serious and clear rule violations. (edit: encouraging downvoting or vote manipulation would be against site rules)

Saved.

I'll do this next week when things have cooled down. I have no interest in overdosing everyone on this custodial shit.

Even if they were worth something, I have no interest in manipulating votes, though it's a good note to share to keep others too enthusiastic on a crusade in check or may be unaware of the rule subtleties.

Which do you think would be better:
https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/wiki/Shills - main wiki
https://saidit.net/s/SaidItCleanup/wiki/ - out of the way (requires mod access)
Or elsewhere?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for explaining. I still disagree.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't understand this.

The site is free to use anonymously, or $1/mo to have a named account? by la_cues in Cassy

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Terrific ideas. Other new indie platforms out there are doing similar things.

Unfortunately we don't have coders or startup angel funding to pay some.

Perhaps we can rig some kind of work around if it's not built in to whatever code is available.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

against the principals of free speech which I hold dear.

I do too.

You've completely missed the point. That is my own fault, dwelling on their agendas too much in the OP.

The ultimate point is that they perpetually break the rules while serving their disruptive agendas.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

HOWEVER: You're not innocent here.

Maybe not. Maybe I am. Depends how you look at it.

You drag discussion down with your relentless vigilante complex in trying to out the shills,

I agree. That's the only way I know of to collect the evidence without actually stalking them. I happen across their bullshit or they respond or comment on my posts. Those are the random frictions that may spark into a blaze.

slamming out paragraph after paragraph,

I do this everywhere anyway. This is not unique to my efforts to rid SaidIt of the worst rule-breakers.

following their posts, and just acting like a tattler.

This is 100% bullshit. We're supposed to report problems to the mods and admins to help them maintain this site and civil discourse.

Fucking block them.

Fucking block me if you don't want to read my shit. The block feature is VERY incomplete and is presently one of the shittiest features on SaidIt that is a detriment to our community, IMO.

You're investing far too much

Maybe you're not invested enough.

If you know of a better forum for truth-seeking and free-thinking in our world being strangled by globalists' agendas, then let me know. I'm here to learn, share, grow, improve this community and resist tyranny.

what's going on in your life

I have no shortage of projects. Obviously I've been sharing awareness about /s/Agenda21_Agenda2030, /s/Banksters, /s/Canada, /s/ClassWar, /s/ClimateSkeptics, /s/Coronavirus, /s/CorruptScience, /s/CultureWars, /s/FoodCrises, /s/FuckMasks, /s/Justice_v_Injustice, /s/LockdownSkepticism, /s/NoNewNormal, /s/Politics, /s/Pushback, /s/ResistanceAnalysis, /s/Surveillance, /s/Technocracy, /s/Tyranny, /s/VaccineInjuries, /s/VaccineSkepticism, and Zionism - among other things. Locally I've been active distributing /s/Druthers and organizing and co-leading resistance Freedom Rallies with /s/StandUpWindsor. And I've been helping several seniors that are very aware (3 days this week), though I really should focus more on my farther reaching online /s/Cassy projects including /s/LeverMind my new video channel, in progress, and /s/Projex a wiki for any kind of project, especially tyranny resistance, coming soon.

to make you turn away from those projects

They are still in development.

you need to

You need to stop judging people.

focusing on specific users

If you think one interaction per season is "focusing" then you need to check your eyes.

Those specific users are disruptive trolls who have been perpetually breaking Rule #1 "If a person is caught repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate, they will be removed."

If you are too myopic to see the harm socks and ActuallyNot are doing to our SaidIt community then you need to take a look and focus. Besides my testimony others may give you their abundance of stories and evidence if you ask.

Lastly, if d3rr had enforced the rules, I would not have made this post and the matter would have died on the branch of that discussion where it occurred.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hard work shows forth proper fruit, and dirty work shows forth rotten fruit.

Poetic. Saved.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's irrelevant if they're paid or not.
It's irrelevant if they shill or not.
We all have agendas.
It matters if they break the rules - perpetually.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

My two cents: I agree.

I also think the rules should be enforced and perpetual downward trolls should be banned.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Get the fuck out!?

I gave you a bunch of examples of ActuallyNot and Socks name-calling and you did NOTHING!

I intentionally name-called (it's not my normal modus operandi) to see if you'd actually do anything.

Your selective enforcement of the rules is getting ridiculously suspicious.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The block function is VERY incomplete.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

_And for what it's worth, [...] No harm in mild trolling from time to time.

That's how I saw it as nothing caught my attention before Airbus pointed at them.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I suggested that to d3rr a while ago, but in a new dedicated sub and/or wiki - to build up cases on them. But what's the point when the cases are ignored because muhluvuv freezepeaches over rules.

CC /u/Noam_Chomsky

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Don't blame me for trolls, closed management, management's no show, and the lack of rule enforcement, when they say they want evidence enough to ban them and don't follow through.

Going along to get along is the same bullshit that is going to bring in this vaccine passport bullshit.

A single post once a week for Spring Dramafest was nothing compared to the ongoing trolls, SJWs and Nazis. And a single post this Fall will not turn away people. The world has bigger issues and problems to deal with and I suspect that may be responsible for our numbers (which are on the rise after a dip actually - I looked at Alexa and the other one yesterday while updating the FAQ). Plus there may be more interesting new cohesive communities growing out there like Locals, Odysee, Communities.win, etc. I can only guess.

Yes, SaidIt's days are numbered regardless of M7. The old software may last 1 or 5 or 10 years, or more, but eventually the old code will no longer be supported and d3rr is not interested in transplanting it.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Skeeter's real name is Edward.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

circumventing bans by creating new accounts

If we don't try we'll never know. If they do come back it proves they're shit disturbers. If they don't no great loss.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know. Popper seems more multi-personality than even socks does. Popper is often insightful and on target - and just as often spewing woke bullshit. Few on here are as unpredictably random. At least he/she/it/they are not authoritarians or terrible liars, so far as I've seen. Pulling that troll bullshit yesterday was new to me and does not bode well.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I had to ban Poopper from /u/StandUpWindsor for a better user experience. Too late after the asstroll shit all over my post. Maybe we'll all have to have private subs for our projects if the rules can't be enforced.

With no rules I expect this place to slide to shit. I hope it doesn't. If it does my hesitancy to recommend it to other aware folks will increase.

I have a huge list of stuff I aim to do, locally and online, including start up a new video channel. So I'm going to pull way back anyway.

I totally fucked up with this post. It's my fault that I wasn't completely clear that this was about perpetually breaking the rules without consequences - NOT the fact that they are liars, authoritarians, and shills. Getting them banned is killing 2 birds with 1 stone. Instead they use censorship victimhood as a shield and suckers buy it.

Voting and algorithm by la_cues in Cassy

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I agree.

Also, I don't like that currently "insightful" gets 2 points and "fun" gets 1 point - and both go to the same total. It might be better they were both 1 and you could chose one or the other.

People, myself included, will vote both to give it all 3 points in order to boost it. I do it to other peoples content more than my own and I've often done this my new posts for the first hour or two, then remove the "fun" vote if it's not appropriate.

The new Reddit-like forum, if/when it ever comes, will not be like SaidIt. Lemmy is currently the best option. It would take some serious work to rework the either up/down into either deep/shallow or heavy/light (alternative terms to your good new idea (wish I'd thought of it)). We are unable to do any serious work to Lemmy at this time.

I agree that quality is important. I think having metatags would be huge with much sorting potential. However one big problem is lazy people not bothering to do their metatags or vote properly, especially with a complex system.

Your algorithmic sorting is very much along the lines of what I was thinking for my MetaVote post in /s/PhoenixForum.

Building on your quality/fun idea, it would be nice if users had a slider with 0 to 100% so you could adjust the "mix" in your feed towards one or the other or balanced as your mood dictates.

The site is free to use anonymously, or $1/mo to have a named account? by la_cues in Cassy

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The site is free to use anonymously, or $1/mo to have a named account?

I don't fully understand but I'm assuming you're proposing this as a business model.

Wikipedia doesn't charge but you can use your account or be anonymous but they still record your IP number, even if it's through VPN or whatever.

I'm assuming you mean there would be endless "anons" chiming in to a big smear of good, bad, and ugly from a anon-hive-voice, but folks could pay to have their name or alias.

But then is there a way to "decentralize" any potential profits or funds in excess of costs?

I'm not sure what you mean exactly.

Here's the plan: 100% open transparent accounting (income, expenses, savings, outgoing), all on the wiki we're building, coming soon at https://Projex.wiki. (The wikis that we've already set up will be for internal use and testing.) Further, how all these funds are managed and their goals will be 100% openly discussed in the /s/GlossedAndProfound online production management cooperative.

Brilliant idea I just had while drinking by AmericanMuskrat in Cassy

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. This is more of a /s/PhoenixForum idea for the future.

I've considered how nice it would be that every Original Poster would be the Moderator of their Original Posts - AND - that they would get notified for every single comment in discussions made under them, not just the responses directly to their post or comments. A lot gets missed in a thread if you only check your inbox and manually checking long discussions manually is tedious. Another option would be to have an indicator "new since you were here last".

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

BULLSHIT.

This post is about how YOU PERPETUALLY BREAK THE RULES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES.

This is NOT about CENSORSHIP.

The fact that you are a proven liar, authoritarian, and big pharma shill is secondary.

If we can kill two birds with one stone, terrific.

You are using censorship victimhood as a shield for your rule breaking, lucky for you.

It's my fault my post wasn't more clear about this.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Sage advice.

I'm not worn down yet.

I've only engaged them in prime opportune moments with purpose, and they consistently provide ample evidence of rule-breaking as they timesuck.

Because I'm trying to be more productive and solutions oriented, I'll be shifting away from SaidIt for a while, but never too far.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Did you mean to share that somewhere else? It seems very off topic.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

There are many, but most are minor by comparison.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Blocking socks won't stop him from ruining SaidIt for everyone, including my local friends who I'm trying to bring here. Ignorance is bliss, but ignorance via blocking is no excuse. Intentionally being blind to the abuses is intentionally setting SaidIt up for failure.

Socks is perpetually breaking the rules.

Yes they're obviously timesucks.

If we don't ban them, we'll never know if they'll come back in alts accounts - and ban evasion is a rule I guess but it's not on the FAQ (/u/d3rr ?). I've been unfairly banned TWICE - and neither of those rule-breakers has even been banned once.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

First the globalists and totalitarians

Then the SJWs and commies

Then the NeoCons and Nazis

Then their shills and asstrolls

Then we're about good.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

well you're not acting like an adult so what other options are there

"I know you are but what am I? I'm a mirror, everything you say bounces off me and back on you."

That's not the kind of reflection I was talking about, but now I guess I suspect you're incapable of self-reflection.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What you say is true.

It's easy enough to show that both socks and ActuallyNot are shills, trolls, and exceptionally disruptive.

how worked up you can get in those conversations

I don't understand why people say that. I'm just verbose for clarity or creativity plus I have strong convictions.

Yes, my energy will be utilized elsewhere after this last post on this shit.

If SaidIt flounders you can't say I didn't try.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Lie.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Right. We can cross that bridge when we get to it.

Take down the big two and set an example for the others, like a public execution.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What about the trolls who say "nigger nigger nigger faggot faggot faggot kike kike kike" all over the place?

Let them roam free?

How do you recommend we enforce Rule #1?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you create more drama than anybody else here

More than socks and ActuallyNot? I doubt it.

Your hypocrisy is extremely ironic, picking a fight while shitting on drama. I bet you can't even see it.

stop acting like a child and learn to play nicely with others

So you're leading by example with an accusatory comment that lacks punctuation?

Reflect and grow up.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

with your free time you can work on setting a better example

Yesterday I was fixing up the FAQ. What do you actually offer SaidIt?

People here know me so fuck your insignificant biased judgemental bullshit.

Maybe with your free time you can fix your attitude.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It only takes one to disrupt, drag down, be an asstroll, smear, lie, misinform, shill, spam, and/or spoil Saidit. We have at least 2.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not too familiar with /u/Vishnu.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

only bullies call people names Jason <deleted comment>

FYI: Socks and ActuallyNot call people names, so you're defending bullies, chucklehead.

So give me a break, snowflake. Haven't you heard? Rules are only for civil discourse and SaidIt will now become the new Voat 3.0, so suck on my snowballs before they melt because this place is going to hell in a handbasket. Too bad the basket is only fire-resistant and won't protect us much. It's already showing signs of smoking, and not the good stuff. But whatever, this is fine.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's not about echo chambers. It's about civil discourse. They are rule breakers. I'd be after them if they were right or centrist or even voluntaryists that broke the rules with downward shit and name-calling.

The fact that they are proven liars, authoritarians, and big pharma shills is a bonus if they get banned for disrupting SaidIt by not obeying rules.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It seems I must have accidentally unchecked the box 20 days ago. Didn't miss anything too substantial.

Joe Rogan triggers media over Covid treatments (13:45) ~ Alison Morrow by JasonCarswell in FakeNews

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. Several. She also posts shorter clips on YouTube then invites you to the others.

Why is Dune’s Marketing Campaign throwing author Frank Herbert under the bus? (16:56) ~ Midnight's Edge by JasonCarswell in Dune

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's possible but I think this will be a good series.

The Matrix Resurrections - Cool Trailer, But Why Now? (8:43) ~ The Critical Drinker by JasonCarswell in Movies

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

One is not involved.

The Matrix Resurrections - Cool Trailer, But Why Now? (8:43) ~ The Critical Drinker by JasonCarswell in Movies

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They were always weird. Their first movie was weird and good. They stole the Matrix script and claimed they wrote it. That's a whole thing.

EXPLOSIVE Truth About Vaccines & COVID w/Inventor Of mRNA Vaccine Technology, Robert Malone (1:15:55) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show by JasonCarswell in Coronavirus

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

did you get this other comment notification OP?

So far, I've discovered I've missed at least 15 days (my first page).

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It worked. I got Horrux's comment.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. I don't know how long that's been going on. Damn.

ZOG by Tarrock in politics

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Israel is the only country in the middle east that's an American ally.

WRONG. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Turkey, Egypt, etc.

The Iron Shield is an ineffective bullshit fireworks display to make Israelis afraid of mythical attacks. Look into it. It's yet another scam.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I have reported, collected evidence of rule-breaking, and now d3rr won't do anything.

So you like rule-breaking then? If they can do it everyone will start to.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

because we don't like what they have to say

That is NOT the issue. You missed the point. What about the rule-breaking?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. SaidIt still has rules. But now d3rr is not enforcing them.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Don't be an inauthentic asstroll. You fucking know damn well they don't allow our kinds of echo chambers there. Furthermore, it's not about the echo chamber. Sure we definitely need more authentic left here, and the SJWs are insane so I can't say we need any of them. But those two, as I stated clearly, are beyond just being inauthentic asstrolls - they're liars, perpetual rule-breakers, and disruptive agents on SaidIt.

What changed today is that d3rr said he wasn't going to deal with rule-breakers.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks, though I don't see where. I guess I accidentally unchecked it at some point? Is there a way to find out when this happened? Is it only in one sub or all of them?

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm against banning too.

But will we let our civil discourse slide now because of these two? If they get to perpetually break the rules with downward trolling what's to stop the rest of us from mud slinging? Fuck the filth, lies, and name-calling.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Socks but I don't think he's malicious

Obviously you haven't had enough exposure.

Thanks for your two cents. It counts. As does everyone's feedback here. It's not a simple matter. But they are clear rule-breakers.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

SaidIt has never been an unbridled chaotic cesspool of "free speech". SaidIt is for truth-seeking and free-thinking with goals of maintaining better discourse than elsewhere.

You have some good comments, but most often I very much disagree with. You are frustrating and even piss me off at times in your absurd ignorance, intentional or otherwise. However, you are not perpetually breaking the rules and dragging conversation downward - and thus I won't ever call for you to be banned (unless that changes).

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You inauthentic asstroll, for the umpteenth time, it's not about disagreeing with you as a PROVEN LIAR, AUTHORITARIAN, and BIG PHARMA SHILL, it's also that you are a PROBLEMATIC DISRUPTIVE AGENT PERPETUALLY BREAKING THE FEW RULES of SaidIt.

THIS is a perfect example of how, as I'd stated, " They will of course cry /s/Victimhood, distort, spin, lie, deflect, and delay in all manner of ways. "

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't change anything. Just took the screengrab: https://i.imgur.com/qk5BzIf.png

Also, same story with the new comments not showing up in my messages unless they're responses to me.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

None show up, however, I responded to most of the comments under that post, and the 2 responses to my responses showed up. 1 + 2

Plus your response that this comment is responding to.

Ever wonder what it's like to by Brewdabier in pics

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ditto.

Ever wonder what it's like to by Brewdabier in pics

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

* yacht

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Satire is supposed to be fun.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

That's still a lot of potentially unnecessary effort when we haven't even tried the simple solution.

It's like inventing a vaccine and ignoring Ivermectin.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But you know - banning?

I know right? But where do you draw the line? Clearly they KEEP breaking Rule #1 without consequences. For fuck sakes, I've been banned TWICE and resurrected twice - and so far socks has gone completely unscathed as far as I know. Let's just ban them for a month and see what happens, like a little experiment. Make it permanent if desired.

Lastly, I'm trying to entice my real-life Windsor resistance friends to join this platform. Windsor, SaidIt, and everyone in the world has enough issues to deal with besides asstroll timesucks.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. This is my last effort to help maintain a modicum of decency on SaidIt.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

This is about more than just my comfort. Among many reasons, this is also about not alienating new users who are truth-seekers and free-thinkers but don't give a shit about trolling culture found anywhere else. For example, it seems like Popper was trying to fuck up my efforts to bring my real-life Windsor resistance friends to this platform.

Other users have been banned an not returned. Maybe they deserved it maybe they didn't. Certainly most of them did. If and when they return, it's obvious who the real trouble makers are as they tend to let loose. Some have quietly returned and been civil, because they never really deserved it. If we did ban socks and ActuallyNot and they did return we might see their true essence, if it wasn't already obvious.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

/u/d3rr

The problem is back.

If I hadn't looked at the comments under this post I wouldn't have known about most of them as they didn't show up in my https://saidit.net/message/unread/ as they typically used to do.

Tomorrow I can go back over the last week to see if I missed other comments under posts. I wouldn't know how to find missed response comments.

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

It's more than just trolling.

Rule #1 : "If a person is caught repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate, they will be removed."

SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around? by JasonCarswell in AskSaidIt

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry about that. I was having trouble with the thumbnail. Since there were no votes and not comments I re-posted it assuming no one noticed the post yet. It was not intentional.

I see that you said this:

banning anyone is the height of pussy behavior.

A valid view that I also share. However, /u/ActuallyNot and /u/socks are not just anyone. They're proven asstrolls here to disrupt SaidIt, while lying and spreading authoritarian misinformation.

Before you claim I'm intolerant of all asstrolls and want them all banned feel free to look at my interaction earlier today. Like the other two who are much worse, /u/Popper occasionally has some good things to say, though I often throw up a little when I digest /u/Popper's bullshit too. Today's /u/Popper incident was different than I've ever seen as he/she/it/them decided to go full-on asstroll forcing me to make my first moderator ban ever. Our /s/StandUpWindsor community sub is about resisting tyranny in Windsor, Ontario, Canada where I'm quite certain /u/Popper doesn't live. I gave the asstroll many opportunities to apologize for insulting my local community, and me, in front of them, whom I'm trying to entice to SaidIt away from Facebook. Not a good look for SaidIt via the bullshit of Popper.

Yet, in short, I haven't called for /u/Popper to be banned from SaidIt - so far, if ever.

Do not ask me why they're all acting crazy today. Maybe they all got a Mossad memo to up the timesuckage and chaos.

Rule #1 : "If a person is caught repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate, they will be removed."

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I only get personal attacks from you. (You're breaking the Saidit rules.)

You say that to me. So either it's him or me or YOU ARE A LIAR.

And I don't know anyone who has perpetually broken more rules on SaidIt that you, socks.

This was bound to happen somewhere by jet199 in NotTheOnion

[–]JasonCarswell 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Always were. But they only show it in the extreme for wars, pointless other than for depopulation and traumatization into submission. This is global class war.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Truth.

Fighting Vaccine Mandates - #SolutionsWatch (1:01:25) ~ The Corbett Report by JasonCarswell in ResistanceAnalysis

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Show notes, links, comments, and alternative platforms:
https://www.corbettreport.com/solutionswatch-vaccinemandates/

Fighting Vaccine Mandates - #SolutionsWatch (1:01:25) ~ The Corbett Report by JasonCarswell in NoNewNormal

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Show notes, links, comments, and alternative platforms:
https://www.corbettreport.com/solutionswatch-vaccinemandates/

Fighting Vaccine Mandates - #SolutionsWatch (1:01:25) ~ The Corbett Report by JasonCarswell in VaccineSkepticism

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Show notes, links, comments, and alternative platforms:
https://www.corbettreport.com/solutionswatch-vaccinemandates/

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You aren't a mind reader, no matter how much you pretend to be, and you clearly can't comprehend many things that are obvious to most here, including my motives.

Sidebar with Lauren Southern! Viva & Barnes LIVE! (2:01:29) ~ Viva Frei by JasonCarswell in Interviews

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Never said this before, /u/d3rr, she's got sexy armpits. Now I SaidIt.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

Doubling down on bullshit makes you twice as shitty.

Anyone who disagrees with you will get this kind of response from you.

False.

people who disagree with you are not automatically inauthentic, lying, shills, SJW, shit disturbers, or whatever).

Correct.

Moreover, it can only help Saidit to have the occasional user disagree with the right-wing and alt-right misinformation and disinformation here.

Correct.

There aren't more users here because you and others have harrassed and tried to ban people who've naturally questioned

False.

_this misinformation and disinformation (and because Saidit spreads these lies on its front pages).

False.

It's sad.

So leave. Find happiness in your "truths" elsewhere. Fare thee well.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We can't know for sure, but he claims to be from Nor Cal.

Open letter to Windsor Freedom Rally folks. by JasonCarswell in StandUpWindsor

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'll get the last word

This proves you are an immature inauthentic asstroll without remorse nor apology.

You are banned from this community about resisting tyranny in Windsor, Ontario (where I'm quite certain you don't live) for dragging down discussion, against SaidIt rules.

As a SaidIt user (and moderator) for 3 years next month, you are the first asstroll I've ever had to "moderate". Now go gag on your sense of accomplishment somewhere else.

In 20 years: saying "the sky is blue" will be politically incorrect. by TheAmeliaMay in whatever

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't care about differences of opinions.

I care about inauthentic shit disturbing authoritarian shill liars always chiming in to cause trouble with their bullshit opinions and lies.

You budded into this conversation with your "opinion" and LIES saying I'm trying to censor people and LIED again falsely saying it was because I disagree with them, TWICE.

There's a huge difference between censoring people and banning infiltrator SJW asstrolls here only to cause trouble. You are an agent of chaos who pretends not to understand this.

SOCKS & ACTUALLYNOT ARE PROVABLY LIARS AND SHIT DISTURBERS.