She keeps getting held up as some paragon of rationality in the practice of transgenderism. I call bullshit. Some people will point to the Buck Angels and Blair Whites and say "see, they aren't all crazy." I suspect they are simply more cunning in presenting a conciliatory tone than the wokeholes do. For example, "transition" is not possible because one cannot become the opposite sex, yet she insists on using the term. Or another example here, putting "biologically" in front of male or female is unnecessarily redundant. Seemingly rational or crazy, they all are promoting the same base ideology. It's the concept which is at odds with the phenomenon of homosexuality.

Also, no one is saying biology "doesn't exist" -- she is relying on the same "existence" strawman, just in a different way than we're used to seeing.

At least she puts the word male in quotes, I guess that's something. I will never see her as a man because she is not the same as me.