New Australian "pre-crime" bill allows authorities to arrest citizens for dissent, online "conspiracies"

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T23:51:15+00:00

What happened over there...? It seems like it was all at once.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T23:38:56+00:00

Of course OP has no idea. Just like how all people who love their country, live in america (and thus are nationalists) but committed the sin of being white people who are the devil.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T23:36:05+00:00

For changing the rules or obeying the rules?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T23:27:58+00:00

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/cb/e9/65/cbe965dc845a16512c317959163fd361.jpg

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T23:26:16+00:00

Boomer

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T23:22:57+00:00

Thank you. So uh, some quick legwork on the second link says "The original copy of the diary has never been released for public (sic)." The second brings this link https://www.hdot.org/debunking-denial/af3-ballpoint-pen/ which disagrees with what we are trying to discover.

It seems that no one has (thought to) simply do a super high quality scan to either prove or disprove the claims. :(

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T23:16:40+00:00

Yes, I am right. But you are too. The RTS's were rampant with cheaters, but that was not due to the cheaters being undetectable. Plenty were found and nothing was done. Don't fall into modern assumptions about responses to found cheaters.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T22:55:19+00:00

As referenced by Tim Pool https://lbry.tv/@timcast:c9/democrat-meltdown-over-supreme-court:7 before he unknowingly advocated for repealing the 17th amendment (19 minute mark) and then immediately bragged about being very liberal. Rushed Transcript found here: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week-transcript-20-20-nancy-pelosi-ted-cruz/story?id=73126749

Quoted as: "PELOSI: ... Ten states as I said, on Friday, started their early voting, the day that we lost Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But to be clear, you're not taking any arrows out of your quiver, you’re not ruling anything out?

PELOSI: Good morning. Sunday morning.

The, uh the- We have a responsibility. We've taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people."

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:43:17+00:00

Yeah I expect that. I was just hoping someone could link the primary sources. I realize I'll have to get a translation, but I'm not scared of textual analysis.

All dead links: https://anne-frankhistory.weebly.com/primary-sources.html :(

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:26:08+00:00

It's okay they are on T blockers and soy. They hate men as much as the TERFs.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:25:15+00:00

Damn hippies.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:22:38+00:00

Shills. They didn't speak up much when Obama was jailing THEM.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:16:19+00:00

I think you mean 60 years ago abortion was a non-issue; it was illegal most everywhere. The truly desperate would visit their aunt in New York.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:14:39+00:00

Wtf! There is NO guarantee of successful reversal. It ain't a pill...

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:11:34+00:00

Brutal.jpeg

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:10:10+00:00

And with 2...

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T02:01:50+00:00

And then when they have low T, can they take estrogen and mutilation surgery to become a woman? If they still want to date women are they a lesbian?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T01:59:57+00:00

So just to be clear, men providing for society's children helps justify their intervention in this matter, right? I'll have a follow up question.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T01:47:28+00:00

https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/ states fountain pen. Are there PDF scans, etc of the primary sources that will allow for better analysis than he said she said?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-20T00:00:35+00:00

Err you needn't abuse that quote. It's related to the analogy, but I can if you'd like.

Also the Japanese were way worse than the Russians or Germans.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T23:57:32+00:00

Don't know for sure. I can point you to other's estimations, though. Standard breakpoints are 1.5,2,3,3.5,4,4.5,5.5,6 million. Let's pick 4? Like I said, I'm not a historian and I didn't live through it. Not sure the relevance though.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T23:35:22+00:00

Hmm I found: "Concerned about China’s potential use of advanced airborne early-warning (AEW) radar systems, the United States dissuaded Israel from lucrative arms deals in 2000 and 2005, souring Chinese-Israeli security trade relations. No further sales of military technology between China and Israel have been reported since." which does not support the claim, but then: "The head of defense exports for the Israeli Defense Ministry resigned after a U.S. investigation concluded that technology, including a miniature refrigeration system manufactured by Ricor and used for missiles and in electro-optic equipment, was sent to China, according to the Israeli newspaper Maariv." from 2013 which does.

I'll look up that book I guess.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T22:59:31+00:00

Warcraft III (not the reforged/refunded version) had something similar and that was super old school small bandwidth: all user actions were recorded and available for playback. It's pretty easy to see most all cheaters that way.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:38:28+00:00

Oh no... you're right.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:36:30+00:00

You... you forgot the 'until death part'. Marching in a band is fun. Marching until you die is not.

You're answer of 'yes' means that you consider what Germany (and the US) did to be a holocaust, which contradicts your above "'the holocaust' didn't even happen tho." But I suppose you already knew that. Congrats on the successful troll.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:32:00+00:00

Thank you for sharing.

So you're at 3/900 or a .003% rejection (99.996% success) rate. That's good for a group of ex-drunks, right?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:24:08+00:00

I demand you live in a bubble because you might give accidentally and unknowingly me a flu.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:23:07+00:00

Transparency in government? Leftist Canada won't allow that. It'll be all "don't let people downplay the risks" nevermind realizing that's the entire point: cost vs benefit.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:19:41+00:00

Have you addressed his 30mil serious cases source, or the 1mil deaths (Minimum of 57k deaths without contributing factors, assuming the 6% rate), though? Or maybe you have some competing sources? Or atleast anecdotes? I was enjoying this exchange.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:08:56+00:00

Oh wow. https://www.thesixthaxis.com/2020/04/28/valorant-disable-uninstall-vanguard-anti-cheat-driver/

Yeah the solution is simple in those multiplayer games: just force-stream the player's side that the game shows to the matchmaking server. Then let opponents review it and submit. No spyware, just literally what the game doing and already communicating to the online servers.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:04:48+00:00

Uh, any sauce for that transitive military secrets insinuation?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T02:00:33+00:00

When only blue checkmark "influencers" are left, then we can just leave them there and visit that zoo.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T01:59:10+00:00

And the muslims too. Except extra trolling for those of us who those everyone saw it and nodded when Trump mentioned it, only to have the media freak.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T01:57:03+00:00

That's ... that's actually kind of ingenuous. Except now everyone sees it. Wait ... is that a better explanation for the suspected pedo company with shower curtains (with names matching missing children) for ridiculous prices?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T01:54:33+00:00

Even leftists know that was beyond the pale with the American Dictator (FDR) threatened that before. But, having watched Joy Blowhard from the view claim her blackface (the worst sin evarr) was okay, I suppose they are beyond caring about hypocrisy.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T01:51:27+00:00

Thank you! /meme

The sad part is that they can't just rewind the clock and unpoliticize the courts because then the left will just do what they did before.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T01:46:04+00:00

Um. I suppose that is what the leftist argument actually is. Hence me posing an answer in question format. It really does sound pretty bad when you feed it back to me. Well, I gave it my best. Have a lightbulb, sir.

Oof, time to take a break from all the leftist propoganda I've been going over. I just had to block more insults from a TERF on saidit (a power-hunger mod one, no less). And just think, I'm talking to holocaust deniers and I haven't had to block any of them because they haven't been mean.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T01:40:46+00:00

cracks neck Alright. So, honest question: do you believe the standard, basic narrative of Anne Frank (for example)? From wikipedia that is: "Following their arrest, the Franks were transported to concentration camps. In October or November 1944, Anne and her sister, Margot, were transferred from Auschwitz to Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, where they died (probably of typhus) a few months later." If not, what do you think happened and do you have some evidence for the alternative.

If you do believe the basic parts I listed, how would you classify said death? Is jailing innocent citizens and children in camps until they die not a standard 'holocaust' outcome? Surely you must have a different take to write your second line.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-19T01:26:42+00:00

You misspelled spread.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T20:24:41+00:00

Oof, that might be true. I had heard that before but was unwilling to test. I have been doing that for a while now and don't have any good counter-examples for you. It's a good thing I'm not going full Steven Crowder with a banner or anything. I'm just looking for casual conversation that goes a bit deeper. I just was hoping saidit would have that thanks to the pyramid of debate idea.

Reddit doesn't have reasonable arguments, precisely because everything is an echo chamber. Even the ones that are set up as debates don't allow for 'how does this principle in this sub interact with that principle over there.' Despite being seemingly on topic, they are still removed because they don't reinforce the you versus me stuff.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T20:06:34+00:00

If you'd like stick to your guns when you say "I really don't give a shit about the context of your remark either" then you've lost the argument and are not conversing in bad faith. I don't read material presented in bad faith, especially when presented either poorly or in hostility, so I won't bother with the rest of that. I live by Hanlon's razor, even if I'm not given the same benefit of the doubt.

I'll let you try again, if you'd like to reverse that position on where a person's coming from, but to be honest any keyboard vomit other than that and I'm just going to block you. If you wanted to show that you can get me to 'ease up' on 'let's not be reddit' idea, you can take that as a win, if it makes you feel better. I don't normally block people on message boards, in fact I don't have a single person blocked on reddit and I subbed to pretty much every non-porn quarantined sub I could find. Maybe all the awful people I've found over there still kind of ... care? I'm not sure what that says about you, but you deserve to know. I consider that action a last resort, but it's awfully hard to have a discussion with someone who basically doesn't believe in the pyramid of debate and then combines that with other red-level name-calling. There's only so much eye-rolling I can take. Maybe if your insults have ever had any truth in them, I could have gained some introspection from listening to them.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T19:40:15+00:00

Then re-read the OP. I don't care about how echo chambers are formed, doubly since you didn't tell me any specifics I didn't already know (which I told you). This has to do with why they have no warnings and why they are mixed in with more normal subs.

Alright since the https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg orange-level adhominems ("try and sound smart", "crass") and yellow-level tone responses ("be respectful" "use tact" "ill-mannered") won't stop, whilst simultaneously insisting I'm not using the pyramid of debate, I'll take this slow on the off-chance you do not realize that you have one attempt at a purple-level refutation ('I like echo chambers for their comraderie') with an attempt at a teal-level counter-argument about a statistical niche for echo chambers. This attempted counter-argument was misplaced, because you were simply arguing for the same thing that I was, ie "I am fine with allowing echo chambers on saidit", which I tried to redirect you away from talking about simply "having restrictive subs" to "about being able to discern what is a normal place".

If you'd like me to readdress the camaraderie part, I will be happy to do that. If anything, my suggestion about standardized 'keep out' warning signs or /ec/ instead of /s/ should only reinforce what I'm saying: separate places for camaraderie that statistically low-number groups might want to be sure of. But gaslighting me about not having a central point or refuting others is not okay. I am pretty good about staying on topic, but I will not apologize for seeing connections to said topics others may not.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T19:11:43+00:00

You mean, like the top comment here? Because if that's the bar that got set, then I'm doing far better than that. You're leaning awfully hard on that "should" about sidebars. Compare to my "convoluted" mention in the OP. A warning would be nice so people can use more than one sub at a time, rapidly, back and forth, without having to wonder about what self-censorship to apply. I've got one universal setting and it's been good enough for everywhere except GC and /r/MGTOW. Although, come to think of it, they are two sides of the same coin.

Maybe reddit just has nicer users. I'm not sure. Here's the end of a nice DM chain I just got about philosophy from redpillwives. I won't paste the name of the user, but I think the anonymous text is suitable to share: "I see, and yes I agree. With the polarity comes also interdependence and that's why it would not be accepted in TRP. They need to drill in the independent man, "you don't need women", idea.

But it's the same with feminism, exactly the same, but from a position of not accepting there is any polarity. TRP accepts the polarity, the difference between men and women, but develops its ideas pragmatically and stoically, I'd say, withdrawing rather than being in your face hysterical."

Those are her words not mine. Ironically I was telling this user to come to saidit because the mods aren't as crazy. But if it's common for innocent users to get banned for wrong-think in subs without clear warning labels, I might have to take that back. Reddit has freakin' quarantine pages!

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T19:06:46+00:00

Thanks for the synopsis I was unwilling to do.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T19:05:23+00:00

You... don't believe in the thing you think a relevant criticism? So you're just trolling then. Okay. And as far as my metaphors go:

https://en.meming.world/images/en/thumb/7/74/No%2C_I_don%27t_think_I_will.jpg/300px-No%2C_I_don%27t_think_I_will.jpg

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T19:00:30+00:00

You, sir, just made an argument for a flat tax AND setting it's limit to the lowest international trading partner! Well done.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T18:56:44+00:00

Devil's advocate:

What if instead of being 'bought' the debate requires funding? What if the only people who know one side of the debate also are involved in the money of said side. What if that side's (presumed to be wrong) opponents are well funded. Should the right side hamstring themselves? What if this causes the right side to barely lose? Does this change the ethics of refusing the help?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T18:52:43+00:00

Beyond just the 'but obama,' which be fair is still fairgame, the linked secondary source appears heavily biased. Here's the primary source https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/29/2017-27977/exemptions-from-certain-prohibited-transaction-restrictions

Who wants to translate this into laymen's terms and give citations for the interpretation? Bonus points for explaining like I'm five exactly what the links in the chain are that makes said actions corruption.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T18:37:09+00:00

It might be because there's actually a lot of different views on here. Correctly a lack of shared political leanings requires labeling who you are talking about in the conversation. I can't prove this is the case, but I think it's certainly a possibility.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-17T18:35:56+00:00

I thought it was just people fleeing reddit random bans. /r/WatchRedditDie is like shooting fish in a barrel nowadays

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T20:21:14+00:00

In the off-chance that you're not trolling, I'll put up the chaz as a good example. Due to the fusion with BLM, the St. Loius couple is another. Those Ken and Karen memes are great.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T20:18:16+00:00

Lol. So now we're arguing over victim olympics? You know, some of us are cultural marxists and in fact do not believe that everything is about power and oppression.

You should try and put on those lenses sometime. You'll be able to see the leaves on the trees and the forest beyond the trees.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T20:14:00+00:00

I had this queued, but I was expecting more traffic before posting. Perhaps that was a mistake and the reply should have been given earlier. Live and learn:

Another good idea would be to have side bars list what is a good reason to automatically ban a person for participating. For instance a black nationalist sub that conveniently forgets to mention they are not just black nationalists, but black nationalists who must be black (and therefore ban non-blacks that are also black nationalists). Yes, that would be difficult to show. Yes, mods appear to stalk users outside the sub they mod for (just like reddit). But that's a question for another time.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T20:09:39+00:00

Uh, I already know all of that wall of text.

I challenge the relevance, though, because you said 'that sub' but then continue to talk about what I assume is /s/ lesbians. But I never mentioned that subseddit. I only mentioned /s/ GenderCritical. I suppose if you want to address my examples, you may refrain a reply of the above in the context of /s/ GenderCritical. I'd like that.

I am purposely not linking heavily to these examples, because they are just that: examples. This is a much larger, site-wide issue just some small problem on a handful of subs. If I am to actually use this site, I have to know where I can speak openly and where I shouldn't bother posting since the wrong-think will just get me banned.

Sanity check: yup I mentioned "An example of this on reddit is" and "An example of this behavior on saidit".

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T20:03:20+00:00

Sigh. I'm really not complaining about having restrictive subs. You want /r/blackpeople to be for black people? Go for it. You want your white nationalist playgrounds? Go for it. This is about being able to discern what is a normal place (where you can politely speak your mind) and what is not (where you get banned for wrongthink).

But maybe you still can't understand, so let me bring in Sargon of Akkad for a moment. What you just said is clears throat: "Too bad niggers ... still won't get it." See how that sounds? Do you get why having a simple warning banner might a good idea now?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:52:11+00:00

First of all, I find the stalking creepy. Drop the ad-hominems. It's a bad look.

Second of all: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you%27re_a_dog . I post in different manners depending on where I am at. My only real consistency are things such as: honesty, intelligence, empathy, counterfactualism, morality, etc, etc. Woof.

Thirdly: your dishonest attempts to summarize my words are nails on a chalk board. Not only have I done no such thing, it's actually pretty actually very ironic, if you had more information (which you have proven yourself very unworthy of).

Fourthly: I'm a bit surprised you had the gall to give an (out of context quote). Allow me to educate you: there is something in language called 'mood.' It allows story telling from positions other than the speaker. The point of the story was that gay men often have other ... how do I put this politely ... affinities which are still illegal but are being pushed by Netflix, the NYT, etc. And in that story it explains how pressures from very advocacy groups has resulted in exactly the kind of male takeover of lesbian spaces that you abhor. This story was highly relevant to the point of view being mocked in the thread, and thus the issue at hand. I admit that I personally do find the position worthy of mockery. But it's connection with other ideas was highly relevant. If you actually think I, as an individual, have an ultra-feminist teacher, you're mistaken. I would not tolerate such behavior personally. However, many males (and females) today do not have that luxury or do not have the strength of character to clear those things from their lives, thus story does include those elements. Do you not follow, or is it too pedantic? No one likes an explained joke, just like no one likes and explained meme, or a story that could be described in a few sentences via linguistic mood rather than fifteen paragraphs without it. You say "we fucking get it," but you don't. Debates are about attack, which does not interest me. It's about open, simply communication ... commenting, if you will.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:35:00+00:00

... why? Because she was a lost soul?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:33:36+00:00

Not even a minute in and he starts off on the wrong foot. George "Fentanyl" Floyd wasn't killed. He committed suicide when he decided to "speedball". There's a reason regular druggies know not to do this. He was even aware of his impending, strung-out doom when he repeated "I'm going to die" while fighting going from his car to the cop car and instead begged "I'll go to the ground, please." He wanted to die there. Suicide by cop is real. The real shame is the police had no idea that they were being used this way. It begs the euthanasia question again.

Anyway, no point in watching the other ten minutes.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:26:47+00:00

I thought pooping in public was no big deal in San Fran. They even have special poop cleanup squads!

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:22:55+00:00

Someone saying something distasteful on the internet?

Counterargument: There is a a possible point that the left's censorious nature has actually swept the 'far right' problems under the rug. I am not sensitive to this argument because I see things differently and also have different solutions for the supposed problem, so I'm not the correct person to study this (maybe a group of moderates?). But it is something to consider.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:16:38+00:00

Not to go full antivax but, does this surprise people? Of course healthier diets are going to allow the body to fight off infectious disease better, especially something with a 99.99% survival rate for people under 45 (most of the workforce).

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:12:02+00:00

Elect him to what, governor of every state? You know America has sovereign states, right? We don't have a king that can just force whatever.

Although, that does remind me of when the left lost their minds (again) for Trump mentioning declaring a state of emergency and throwing the national guard at Portland if the entire city 'falls' to antifa. That was a good news cycle; so much 'reeee he's a dictator!' talk.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:08:07+00:00

I'll go further than that! Let's force the Pence rule. the OG himself can have 2.5 terms when leftists murder Trump in 2022...

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:04:17+00:00

Can't let the truth out!

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:03:56+00:00

I would. States rights are a thing. Leftist shitholes are allowed to be leftist shitholes. The problem is when they lyse out into red states. Slightly left voters didn't stop this from happening, and they will repeat the cycle in new areas.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T19:01:19+00:00

You mean slow diffusal and arrests? That's the only thing that can be done. Well, unless you want to give into the mob and encourage more of such activity, aka terrorism (violence for political ends).

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T18:59:24+00:00

That's it's new name: pedoflix

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T18:58:52+00:00

Forced work, you say? No, Communism fell only 30 years ago. The Chinese just didn't get the memo

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T18:57:46+00:00

This is what I like about saidit. So much sauce, no downvotes when people ask.

Heck, I upvote requests for links.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T01:06:04+00:00

This.

Also, do the /s/saidit admins check the threads like this for ideas or is there a separate area for submissions?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T00:54:58+00:00

Yes that is a constant theme between 1st wave feminism all the way to the current 4th wave. On second thought, that's probably why they banned me. I pointed out the obvious connections between 3rd and 4th wave feminism.

I'm not one of them (my OS isn't leftism), but I can see why that would make them angry. The whole reason they are here is because they refused to 'update' to the latest patch of leftism. Software maintainers get angry when they are reminded that their software is legacy, even when everyone already knows it.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T00:51:04+00:00

That does make sense. That's why having a warning banner and /ec/ instead of a /s/ is necessary to make sure everyone knows that although similar subs are not for free speech, they are just nestled in a larger free speech community.

A simple 'there be dragons' seems reasonable to me; it doesn't stop them from doing what they are doing. It might even ease their moderation burden. I wouldn't know, but must be tiring to ban everyone you disagree with.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-16T00:47:23+00:00

I have heard this. It seems to be mildly common red pill wisdom. I do see areas where this is definitely true. But I have a beef that probably prevents me from making having a larger objective opinion on it. So I leave it be for now.

I'm not sure why that's relevant, other than to point out why someone as innocuous as me got banned from there. Perhaps it was because I told them I was also banned from /r/MGTOW. I'm not sure. They did find that rather funny. The irony abounds. At least saidit has the moderation log public so I could figure out what I did "wrong." Apparently it was to simply disagree with 'we are x' and 'we will later make a debate sub' and just assume I would think this means NO DISSENT ALLOWED or whatever. I view this as a reddit toxicity hold-over.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-15T16:31:15+00:00

I am aware. I would call setting back on the same communities after a ban a 'flight', but I suppose there is some hair to be split somewhere in there that doesn't make it sound like "evasion". I made a small edit to appease you.

Shortcuts are good, yes. That's the reason we don't all define every single word we use as we use them. When you say "the entire sidebar," you should have said 'that one little part we nearly hid.' Are you one of those people who blamed the subprime mortgage crisis on borrowers who didn't read the fine print?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-15T16:26:33+00:00

"Just accept my insult, you stranger!" Classic well-thought out leftism. No wonder they make for poor judges.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-15T03:08:43+00:00

Maybe they think BLM is their god?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-15T02:06:06+00:00

How can I see what subs count as "default"? What is the process for becoming a "default" sub?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-15T02:01:51+00:00

Care to pick this apart and explain the good parts vs the bad parts? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noahidism

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-13T03:30:31+00:00

OP is definitely right. The left thinks they are going whip the normies into good little NPCs or get more fascists because they make for good strawmen to go burn at the stake. But they are mostly wrong. Yes, some do succumb to TDS, but what really happens is that the moderates wake up and move to the right. Those already on the right don't move to fascism (although we are becoming more hard-assed than before) because all their stupidity just shows that we were correct all along.

In 1990 being called anti-black was like being called a witch in the Salem trials. Being called anti-black in 2020 is like being called a witch when the last Harry Potter book came out. It just doesn't have the same punch. No one cares if you actually are pro-this or anti-whatever. Be a good person & citizen otherwise and it's as ignorable as the fact that you may or may not like Yemenese people. Either way doesn't matter.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-13T03:23:26+00:00

Only if you are white and going against the genocide narrative.

(Sigh. OP is right. Okay, fine, time to start getting based)

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-13T03:20:45+00:00

Now that she's safely in the US, she can speak up. Shame about the Chinese government destroying her earlier data. That's one of the few ways to get scientists salty enough to speak up.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-13T03:13:25+00:00

It's more of a quid pro quo. They want him to create problems and they will fix the problems with their money. I assume the money would go to the state, not him personally, right?

In an actual bribe, the money goes to him rather than his country.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-13T03:08:34+00:00

Normally I'd ask for sauce but I'd figure I'd show my attempts first. Here's what I found: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Department+of+Defense+2.3+trillian+missing+9%2F10%2F01 https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-rumsfeld-says-2-3-trillion-missing-from-the-pentagon.165/ https://web.archive.org/web/20100301161721/http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=430

So is that it? Case closed? I've never heard of the 2.3 trillion number but it's awfully specific, so you have to be getting that from somewhere. You're not talking about untracked transactions, right? Because I do not want the gov't tracking every financial transaction possible. That would be bad.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-13T02:50:49+00:00

Well since you seem to be in the know, are the stats for 'civilians' counting ALL persons not active enemy combatants with no exceptions: ie, a bomb accidentally killing Osama bin Laden's cook instead of him would count as a 'civilian death' even though he's a true believer in the murders Osama had carried out and was actively helping them come to fruition?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-13T02:45:50+00:00

oof I go on vacation for just a few days...

I was just about to thank you for sauce.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T21:14:42+00:00

"out bombed Obama"? Sauce?

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T21:13:34+00:00

Two balls and a strike. You shoulda kept swingin'

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T21:10:15+00:00

It has always been a battle between the satanic and the faithful. It still is.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T21:06:41+00:00

Of course it's unhinged, but it's the same argument as quotas and glass ceilings and ... you know where I'm going with this.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T21:04:44+00:00

If they are young the first part is easy (pre-insulin metabolic poisoning), and if they are leftist they will, you know, be easy. So you can degrade yourself like that if you want.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T21:03:31+00:00

Agreed. The plastic/soy estrogen poisoning concerns are real. Not that the left cares; no 'women and minorities hardest hit' headline to be made there.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T21:02:10+00:00

I can't. It's too leftist. Someone tl;dr this for me.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T20:58:29+00:00

Don't just lurk, post. What are they going to do, ban you for having a contrary opinion? Wait, don't answer that. I still don't know why I got banned from r/MGTOW

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T20:48:27+00:00

But muh PhD in gender studies!

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T20:47:46+00:00

Another problem fixable by school vouchers

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T20:47:05+00:00

But there are far more ways to do things incorrectly than to do them rightly.

If you are having a hard time tell them apart, see who the (print) media has libeled the most, for the longest. It's a good guess when you need true North but don't have a compass.

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T20:43:02+00:00

Oh I can give you a whooooooole list that don't play that game :)

SaidOverRed · 2020-09-06T04:33:07+00:00

I'll believe it when I see it. Islam is not a religion like any other. It is a political philosophy with religious overtones behind it. There are other religions that are like this (ie, not simply a religion: Confucianism is a good example).

SaidOverRed

Devil's advocate: