all 21 comments

[–]Datachost 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (6 children)

There's some fantastic seething going on on Twitter right now

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

If you've got some prime material, then please share it with the rest of us shitlords. We hunger for the delicious salt to sprinkle upon our popcorn!

[–]Datachost 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (4 children)

https://nitter.net/ValentiaDM/status/1544635657892634624#m

Here's a full thread of them. Lots of "On a technical level this is actually a win for us". My personal highlight is that fuckwit trying to tell a lawyer with decades of experience that he knows the law better than her, because he has an A level

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

So much salt, not enough popcorn for it all!

[–]ClassroomPast6178 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

There’s lots of, shall we say, tuppenny legal interpretation going on there and as anyone who has ever instructed a solicitor will tell you, you get exactly the legal advice you pay for.

[–]Datachost 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I like all the people saying "She lost 60% of her case though". Sure in the same way that if a prosecutor gets someone charged with murder, the outcome of the case is a draw, because they didn't get the accused with manslaughter on the same person

[–]ClassroomPast6178 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don’t think they ever quite got over the result of the 2021 appeal court ruling regarding the protection for gender critical beliefs under the Equality Act 2010. That utterly wrecked their main line of attack, that gender critical beliefs were nothing but bigotry and therefore not worthy of protection. Once they were regarded as protected beliefs then Ms Forstater’s former employer had a much harder job defending their decision. Of course, we wouldn’t hear the end of a Muslim being fired for their beliefs, it’d be reported and commented on for days in The Guardian, but I see that it dropped off the BBC front page within hours (strange that!).

The “analysis” of the news from the BBC’s “LGBT and Identity Correspondent” is fairly shit, I wouldn’t like to speculate as to why, but maybe they shouldn’t have such a post - personally, I would have thought the legal correspondent would have been a much better bet for a good analysis of the situation seeing as it is a legal case and all and it relates to equality and employment law and not the special feelings of the mostest oppressed group evah.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Forstater took a claim for belief discrimination against her former employer, the CGD, after she lost her job for expressing her view that sex cannot be changed and that biological sex matters. These views have become known as ‘gender critical’ beliefs, though they might more accurately be referred to as ‘gender atheism’.

How about we start just calling it "the truth"?

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Ask the simple questions.

Can a trans-woman get pregnant?

Can a trans-man impregnate someone?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Stop reducing them to their genitals!!1#!!2!!!

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Genitals are gender.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

😤😤😤😤 BiGOT!!!112@!!

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

SMALLNT!

[–]r2d2_21 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

referred to as ‘gender atheism’

Was this written by someone religious? Do they believe atheism is not the truth?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I just meant that the views that "sex cannot be changed" and that "biological sex matters" should not be called part of a belief system, because it's literally the truth. These aren't opinions, they're straight up facts.

[–]Haylstorm 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Just clowns

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

obviously she's a bigot for not taking the 4th feminism update

[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

[–]On_WheelsWe need to secure the existence of the gay race 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What in the actua fuck am I reading

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

WTF is that grammar?