Why do neo-Nazis always fight for American foreign policy? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also wrong.

It was the Bavarian equivalent of 'Cletus' in America, from the name Ignatius. Jews and more urban, wealthier etc Germans would use it as a slur for 'backwards' rural people. The NSDAP was popular in Bavaria and Jews started calling them Nazis (Cletus, inbred, redneck) as a derogatory term. They embraced it to be defiant against class prejudice and other disgusting social ills caused by Jews and class society.

A major pillar of National Socialism is to eliminate class stratification and class conflicts.

Originally, the term was used in Germany before the rise of NSDAP as a colloquial and derogatory word referring to an awkward, backward, and clumsy peasant. It would go on to be used as a mockery of the name Ignatz—a German variation of Ignatius.

Indeed, Ignatz was a name common in Bavaria, the region from which the NSDAP emerged. This came to haunt them as opponents tried to draw parallels between the widely mocked name and the party.

Opponents of NSDAP also used the word “Sozi” prior to “Nazi” as a derogative representation of the word Sozialist or “Socialist” in English.

The First time the NSDAP published anything using the term was when Goebbels appropriated it in 1926 to make the 'Nazi-Sozi' (a pamphlet available on the Calvin College German Propaganda Archive) appropriating both the slur for poor people and the slur for anti-capitalists.

Subtitled Hitler speech has nearly 2 million views on Twitter by Mastermustard09 in whatever

[–]Markimus 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

His big mistake was trying to liberate a country from international finance, while surrounded in all directions by the power hubs of the globe-spanning empire of international finance.

Should there be affirmative action for Nazis? by LarrySwinger2 in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That would just be meritocracy😎👍

Where is the evidence for the claim that the left supports pedophilia? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Incels are all turd worldies so it's no surprise, even then it's prolly just FBI agents posting their own thoughts. As everyone knows, the FBI is filled with subhumans.

As for the other shit, paedos were only kicked out of the gay movement in the 90s for optics reasons, and they're being brought back in already. This is common knowledge to anyone who has the most basic 101-tier knowledge of the sexual revolution.

What is your opinion/rebuttal to this common sentiment that liberals believe about right wing ideology? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just another example of middle class people constantly sucking up to power and flexing their higher socioeconomic status above poor people who they hate for not being bourgeois enough.

Fascism Question: What exactly does National Socialism say about Indians and nonwhites being National Socialists? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Aryan = descended of the people who called themselves Aryans. These were Europeans who conquered much of the Middle East, India etc (there's even some archaeological evidence as far as China). The more high caste you get in India the more European DNA they have, although I doubt there's many actual 'Aryans' IE people who have remained unmixed with Indians. Have you ever seen a completely white looking Indian? I haven't, but there might be some. There are more of these kinds of people in the Middle East though, blue eyes, blond(e) hair, completely white looking.

National Socialist = anyone who shares the worldview, it will just apply to your own race rather than Aryans. National Socialism if you're white/European/Aryan = for Aryans, National Socialism if you're Indian = for Indians, if you're Mestizo = for Mestizos, if you're black = for Africans etc. It could be pan-Racial or a particular ethnicity/nation too. In the beginning National Socialism was a specifically German national phenomena (but the Volkisch movement always had pan-European/Aryan interests) then it evolved to become a pan-European one as power of the movement increased and they saw the necessity of the situation IE all whites need to be united in a state in order to compete against external "Racial/Continental/Civilisation superstates" (China, India, Russia, South America, Africa, America) and be protected from International Finance.

Indians love to claim they're the real Aryans and all this stuff, but it's quite clear that they inherited systems, institutions, philosophy etc from white Aryans and not the other way around. It doesn't make sense to think that the white conquerors were undeveloped savages, went to India and became enlightened then continued conquering spreading the institutions and ideas they learned from Indians. Especially since we have archaeological evidence of symbols belonging to the Aryans first showing up in Ukraine, thousands of years before India.

Hamas casually reveal why Gaza doesn't have running water even though foreign donors keep paying for installation by Site_rly_sux in WorldPolitics

[–]Markimus 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Funny how socks was always an extreme libtard moralist until Israel is involved then it's time for genocide and concentration camps.

What do you consider to be the races of the South American nations? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Espanol

Indigena

Mestizo

Negro

Mulatto

Zambo

Americano

Mongrel

Mutt

La Creatura

El Atrocidad

El Monstruosidad

La Luz Extinguido

El Abominacion

El Goblino

El Ogro de las Americas

Will Hispanics in America become White to prevent any minority-white nation? Why do so many liberals believe that? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The conspiracy theory about 'white' being some kind of mystical label that the powers that be use to refer to themselves, and these powers that be are The Majority no less, is just ridiculous on its face. Of course the almighty, omnipotent masses will begin to recruit more groups into their legendary 'white' conspiracy in order to continue holding down their mortal enemy, the black man. For, if the all-powerful self-labelled 'whites' are not 51% or more of the population, they magically lose their super power.

When you really think about the implications of what they're saying with this stuff it goes to show you just how retarded liberals are.

The Great Noticing is upon us by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've had people who aren't /ourguys/ hit me up asking me about Palestine and saying they've noticed people are being antisemitic recently lol.

The benefits of diversity to millions of non-whites outweigh the costs to a comparatively few whites. by Groundround in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No because I don't give a fuck about them, I give a fuck that my ancestors built a country and my people currently maintain it while jews run it taking all the benefits for themselves whilst making us work more and more for less and less to 'elevate' the non-whites.

Sure from the perspective of black people who get to enjoy free houses and cars by simply not paying any loans back it's cool for them, but when white people have to pay shlomo 5x the interest to cover all of the black people's loans it becomes a problem. Then when there's no more blood left to squeeze from whitey what happens? The 2008 financial crash, it'll happen again and again.

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict by TheJamesRocket in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

What do you mean? Salos IS 69 year old English actress Judi Bowker.

College grad's first day at work by xoenix in memes

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

all of them

I was/am targeted by Canada's Active measures program by poweruser in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1 hour account... Who are you? Where's your proof you're not just schizoposting?

Fascism Question: What exactly does National Socialism say about Indians and nonwhites being National Socialists? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why didn't the NSDAP tell the Ustase to stop killing Serbs and just treat them as equals?

No idea anything about this stuff. I assume if they were aware of it they just didn't care because they were fighting the war and it's none of their business. They did step in to stop the Iron Guard wiping out a bunch of Jews in Romania, so perhaps the Ustase stuff was either not known about, or the details of it are fudged for propaganda purposes IE both sides were just warcriming the shit out of each other as usual in every war but after the fact only the guys who lost are talked about for obvious reasons.

Also, what exactly would the world likely look like is the Axis won?

If this happened we'd probably not see a one world government of empire or something like that. Instead it'd just be similar to today but with less jewish fuckery. Africa united, probably as a vessel of Europe instead of China. Asia being similar to today, led by Japan instead of China. USA being its own state, Europe being more united maybe including Russia or Russia would be a secondary state like India. The ME would have no Israel-America fuckery, they'd probably be united as a regional bloc under Iran. It would be almost exactly the same as today but with these split-regions being more united and insular. So the ME being more unified rather than being put against each other for the interests of Jews as an example. Of course there would still be differences in neighbour states, and states meddling around the world with each other - intrigue wouldn't go away, but there would be much more regional uniformity and congruence in my opinion, and definitely there would be less spread of liberalism and globohomo which is spread through the power of High Finance.

The goal of Europe would be to unite into a state large enough to sustain itself and defend itself from any other states. This could be a confederation, federation, or single state. I would expect a federation headed by Germany but where the other states have quite a lot of autonomy. Internally Europe would resemble 1933-1938 Germany, characterised by developmentalism, populism/majoritarianism, high culture being made available to the masses, constant standard of living increases, reduction in wealth disparity and unproductive economic practices etc. But this still being balanced with high level of development, usually in the economy ethics and power/development are not aligned. But with careful management of resources it is possible to balance them; profit sharing, capping dividend pay outs, requiring a minimum amount into reinvestment are examples that benefit the economy at large (developmentalism) and the average person (socialism). These are things the Third Reich did, and China do things along these lines today. China is pulling millions of people out of poverty constantly, and growing their middle class. China is basically National Socialism-lite, they are good to look at to see the kind of things that developmental socialist states would aim for.

Where is the evidence for the claim that the left supports pedophilia? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is some of the dumbest 'reasoning' I've ever seen. By this logic we should assume that there really is a war on drugs and we have a strict anti-drug society despite the fact that all media constantly shoves drug use down people's throats and intelligence agencies work with banks to run the drug trade.

Pushing 'children can consent' through allowing children to become 'trans' is an example of them normalising child sexuality. Along with child drag queens and lapdancers, drag queen story hour etc.

Would sending taxpayer money from White countries to third world countries be the most effective way to stop refugees and migrants? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

G6 Summits have been happening since 1975 brother, don't think immigration has gone down any.

Anglo-Saxons aren’t real, Cambridge tells students in effort to fight ‘nationalism’. by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It is, jewish nationalism.

People pushing conspiracy theories like "Israel/Mossad planned the war with Gaza" are morons who don't understand the JQ by Islamofascist in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jews would never do this, and have never done anything similar in their entire history, because they genuinely believe that Jewish lives have a superior value and are never worth exchanging for anything.

You are aware that jews are responsible for genociding more jews than any other race, right? Their entire history is indeed genociding other peoples, but they also genocide the jewish sects that split off, jews that assimilate etc.

"The good Samaritan" phrase comes from a group of jews that the main jews genocided and "the good Samaritan" was one of the good ones so to speak lol.

It's been nearly 2 weeks since Hamas attacked Israel, and the Israelis still haven't committed their ground troops into Gaza. This mere fact by itself has exposed the weakness of Israel. by Islamofascist in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The goal of Israel isn't military/political though, it's genocidal. All they want to do is make civilian life insufferable for the Palestinians, Hamas is none of their concern.

If/when their neighbours try something for real America will be brought in, Israel has nukes and such, and they'll actually be using their military rather than just dropping bombs on civilians. Your post is assuming Israel is 'trying their best' militarily and is inept militarily, but this is just an assumption. I think jews are more than happy to just terrorise Palestinians without doing any real fighting against combatants because this is what they've been doing forever.

The idea that this should inspire Hezbollah or something I think is a bit fantastical, it seems more like what you want to believe rather than an actual sober analysis. Not saying it's wrong and Israel are actually strong, just that it's not really right either it's just an unknown.

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict by TheJamesRocket in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

banned him

Man reveals the sexual reason he wants to use the women's bathroom; believes actual women feel the same by QueenBread in TumblrInAction

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

they should

Is anyone concerned that AI tech is mainly being created by Non Whites? by tratini in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What difference does it make? Would you prefer if the technology used to genocide your race was created by buttgoy white engineers instead of an assortment of buttgoy engineers who aren't white?

If white men were the only ones creating AI technology it wouldn't magically liberate white people from jews, it's literally completely irrelevant.

Fascism Question: Other than A James Gregor, who else are other fascism experts? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are the videos on his Youtube good?...

I have only watched a few and they had decent information, could be inconsistent depending on who scripted and made them because he has like a gang of guys working together on them. There's an Indian guy in particular called 'Fascifist' who seems like an extreme sperg for example.

José Antonio Primo de Rivera was not a fascist...

I'm familiar, Jose Antonio was more along the lines of a reactionary, Catholic, distributist type character. A lot of these guys called themselves fascist or were allied with Mussolini. Ramiro Ledesma was a revolutionary nationalist and syndicalist. One of the biggest distinctions is the difference between Modernism and Reaction I guess, the agrarian guys who didn't want to modernise their countries vs the guys looking to re-organise their countries to be more powerful. Fascist movements tended to have both mixed together, the non-fascist ones neglected the modernism, rationalisation of the economy, labour-organising etc stuff.

Kalergi...

You ever meet a guy who is fascist because Mussolini was OP in some gay map game? Kalergi was like the original Paradox Sperg lol. Basically he was pretty close to being a fascist, but he was very elitist, and he was on the extreme modernist and progressive end, but instead of being anti-semitic because he saw what jews did with their power he was pro-semitic because he simply recognised their urban, organised, intellectual etc character led them to acquiring power. He was also kinda mystical/esoteric somewhat like a reactionary. Evola did an interview with him you can probably find somewhere online.

Richard Spencer also did like 'debunking rightoid myths about muh Kalergi plan' stuff years ago. Overall it seems that his analysis and predictions are quite accurate but obviously the semitophilia is just in direct opposition to the interests of Europeans. I think Kalergi's perspective is due to the nature of powerful classes, they view their class/caste as their race in a sense. It's quite rare for aristocrats to have a connection to their biological race due to the class hatred they have for people they view as beneath them.

If you read like the first few pages of On The Genealogy of Morals you can understand the elitist/aristocrat/reactionary perspective. Nietzsche literally believes aristocrats invented 'goodness' as being the opposite of the commoners, that common people have inherent characteristics that the aristocrats wanted to distance themselves from and then labelling themselves as 'good' after this new anti-commoner model. He thinks all human morality is based on this. When you realise this is what powerful and rich people think of the other 99.99% it's no surprise that guys like Kalergi have their strange, seemingly incoherent, beliefs.

Fascism Question: Other than A James Gregor, who else are other fascism experts? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Zoltanous

Bogumil

Zoltanous has a book recommendation thing somewhere, maybe on his youtube. You can probably find more scholarly work that isn't dogshit there. There's some scholarly stuff here that's valuable, but it's within the sea of typical quackademic nonsense.

Dylan Riley's "The Civic Foundations of Fascism" and the study "Bowling for Hitler" are both good.

Why did the internet go from being edgy to ultra progressive in the span of 10 years? by sneako in AskSaidIt

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lie

Do you think the far right has any future, when young Whites are overwhelmingly leftist? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

When I was on gamer twitter a 'communist' girl called me racist then DMd me pictures of her ass lmao

Fascism Question: What exactly does National Socialism say about Indians and nonwhites being National Socialists? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think culture is static. In just the past decade or so the average person has changed their behaviour drastically multiple times over due to what the institutions that rule them decided.

Humans adapt to their environment, when the instruments of power create a fascist environment the people will adapt to it. Obviously with there being no foundational institutions to build upon in liberal countries it would take a long time to really establish a coherent society once again, but it can definitely be done in my opinion. The real challenge is getting power in the first place, exercising it isn't the problem.

What you're referring to as individualism in the culture I would say would more precisely be described as a lack of social capital, caused by the intentional atomisation of the people through destruction of institutions, particular kinds of urban planning, media, technology etc.

To learn more about Social Capital and its relevancy to fascism check out 'Bowling for Fascism' and 'The Civic Foundations of Fascism'.

Fascism Question: What exactly does National Socialism say about Indians and nonwhites being National Socialists? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did the majority of National Socialists EVER believe in Nordicism?

This is similar to saying 'did the majority of the Alt Right ever believe in Nordicism?', the Volkisch and subsequently NS movement was a mix of multiple subcultures that had things in common coming together. Someone who might support the NSDAP and be part of the SA would be a nationalist and consider himself a racialist obviously, but did he have any interest in racial science? Maybe some did, maybe some didn't. Some guys would be heavily into anti-semitism and international finance, some guys heavily into mysticism, some guys heavily into racial science, some guys heavily into organising labour etc.

Did it just go away at some point when further research was done?

It was more like Hitler realised that most Germans weren't the Nordic type so he never pursued Nordicism as policy or pushed for it to be emphasised in propaganda outside of aesthetics. It was still a thing that floated around in the culture for sure, Lothrop Stoddard was super into it and thought the Nazis were cucks for not purity spiralling about trying to be purely Nordicist.

I thought that is why Mussolini and Fascists initially had problems with Hitler and National Socialists.

The problems were moreso Realpolitik and also over Austria, Mussolini liked Doofus. Doofus oppressed the National Socialists in Austria, the National Socialists funny-momented Doofus. Mussolini got butthurt his gay friend got owned epic style, the Austrians voted 99.7% in favour of the anschluss with Germany, Doofus proven eternally to be not only a manlet of the body but also a manlet of the soul.

I think that is why Mussolini said those quotes that race is nonsense.

Hitler had similar thoughts as Mussolini in regards to Nordicism. They both recognised there are representatives of all the types all over Europe and there was no such thing as pure of any of the types.

Mussolini talked about race plenty, just not the splitting hairs Nordicism stuff, there's a lot of information you'll find relevant in my comments from this link.

I thought National Socialists disliked SOME Slavs like Serbs

Mostly Czechs and Poles from what I've seen, and that's simply because of politics too not some racial animosity.

Isn't that why they supported the Ustaše's killings of Serbs?

Not sure what this means, are you saying there was some propaganda from the NSDAP that was pro-Ustase killing serbs or something? Them funding it, ordering it? What exactly was the support?

Are there any viable pagan religions for European ethnonationalists? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Asatru if you want something more normal akin to mainstream religions but based on Germanic ancestry.

If you want occult stuff there's stuff like the Rune Gild and groups inspired by them such as Operation Werewolf. I think you'd probably be best off looking through telegram chats of well known pagan figures as well as instagram posts and these kinds of things. Try to find some people near you who are active, if you want to be part of something more occult-esque like that.

Potential Coup by Wagner PMC underway in Russia by ifuckredditsnitches_ in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Man reveals the sexual reason he wants to use the women's bathroom; believes actual women feel the same by QueenBread in TumblrInAction

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

theyre disgusting

Fascism Question: Other than A James Gregor, who else are other fascism experts? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's one with links to other stuff on Korea on the page

I've heard stuff here and there on Poz Button, People's Square, Third Rail about Korea and Japan. I'm not sure if there are others where it's like a deep dive on them as the topic though. You'd have to do keyword searches for "Korea" "Japan" "Park Chung-Hee" "Asanuma" "Borzoi" etc on search engines, the TRS search bar etc to try to find bits and pieces I guess.

Fascism Question: Other than A James Gregor, who else are other fascism experts? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was especially curious about North Korea because if North Korea is fascist, wouldn't that mean that North Korea is the fascist state with the longest existence? It existed since 1948. What would most fascists consider as the fascist state with the longest existence? I was thinking Fascist Italy with 21 years (1922-1943). But Ba'athist Iraq went from 1968 to 2003. I think Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr was also a fascist like Saddam Hussein.

Yeah if they are, I don't think most guys really care though because it's irrelevant to us as Europeans and Americans. From the perspective of fascists in the west all they care about is the liberation of their own countries, other states are really only interesting insofar as they can teach us about tactics, strategy etc to achieve power. I only really care about Germany and Italy because they were European, even if NK is fascist it doesn't matter to us because what can be learned from them anyway? North Korea was founded because the Soviet Union backed Kim Il Sung not because of his own organising and such. People who have some aspiration to organise politically ought to just be studying Germany and Italy because they were grassroots and led populist mass revolutions.

Fascism Question: Other than A James Gregor, who else are other fascism experts? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know about Fascifist. What views is he incorrect about?

It's not about being wrong it's more about his general way of being lol. He has like 20 telegram pages that are like 'Based (insert third world socialist leader)' and he'll like repost all of the other ones across all of them. Then he'll sperg out on some rants on one of them about how he hates the British Empire or some shit and repost that on all the accounts too. I found some of the stuff he was running to be quite useful as I am interested in third worldist kinda stuff a la the SS post-ww2, Yockey etc but this guy is too like personally invested emotionally or whatever in stuff and it makes the stuff he posts that aren't just 1:1 copy paste quotes be negatively affected by his own biases/feelings.

Imperial Japan and Shōwa Statism fascist?

I didn't answer this because I don't know. I don't think they were, I think that guy who got killed with the katana in the famous picture was a socialist who was similar to fascism but I don't think they had a proper fascist movement. Borzoi has made podcasts about Korea and Japan that you'd probably be interested in.

Similarly, is Juche Korean fascism?

I have read a couple things produced by the DPRK about 'the real meaning of nationalism' or something like that, it sounds like Juche is fascist/nazbol adjacent at least. Like how most 3rd world socialist states had more in common with fascism than internationalist marxism. I don't know enough about their policies and such to say if they have a good model or not though.

What do you think Democrats, liberals, and leftists are correct about? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everything that has been co-opted from the right and neutered with liberalism.

Environmentalism, animal rights, socialism etc.

Why are Whites in Britain poorer and less educated than non-whites? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Systemic oppression and brain drain immigration

What would you define White American culture as? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The White American soul at its core is literally Faustian. There is an endless thirst for more for the individual white American who sees himself as an ubermensch. The American mind is still subconsciously fighting for the frontier, everyone still wants to be a cowboy.

This soul is what sprouted a lot of great philosophy and art in the 19th century. The Progressive movement, Transcendentalism and such are American products that come from this Nietzschean-esque and more positive rights English type liberalism kind of ethos that is moreso an expression of the Personality, (in Evola's terms) rather than the kind of negative rights French type individualism/liberalism of anarchism.

Don't quote me on the English and French liberalisms, I have not read these philosophers. I am just using them as archetypes and I'm trusting Spengler's word that they are accurate descriptors.

But yeah, as we have seen when there is a lack of pro-social institutions and an active attempt to subvert these instincts into hedonism, extreme selfishness etc it's very easy to manipulate people into being the literal worst people on the planet.

Fascism Question: What exactly does National Socialism say about Indians and nonwhites being National Socialists? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you! This is very helpful. Which source(s) is most of this info from? One of A James Gregor's books?

Don't know of any specific sources, I have just been reading translations of articles and speeches for years, as well as listening to podcasts, using forums etc.

Did the majority of National Socialists believe in Nordicism?

Nope, that stuff went out of fashion because most Germans aren't of the Nordic type. All of Europe has all of the types (Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean, Dinaric and whatever the others were)

Did most see Slavs as Aryans?

No idea. They definitely saw Slavs and Germanics as being separate and didn't want to mix together. But Slavs objectively speak Indo-European languages so calling them not Aryan doesn't really make sense.

didn't Günther say Slavs were separate

Yes, and many people consider(ed) slavs to be at least partly 'Asiatic'.

Rioters assault home of French mayor, injure his wife by [deleted] in Europe

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes exactly, because Macron acts in the interest of his masters (jews), who hate all whites including the French people. He bombs these foreign people then imports them to his country to ensure they victimise ordinary French people.

The benefits of diversity to millions of non-whites outweigh the costs to a comparatively few whites. by Groundround in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't shill for Palestinians to be in England

Hamas casually reveal why Gaza doesn't have running water even though foreign donors keep paying for installation by Site_rly_sux in WorldPolitics

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that is being a textbook radlib

Weining and dining with Oprah & friends by Musky in memes

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, that's me

Why did the internet go from being edgy to ultra progressive in the span of 10 years? by sneako in AskSaidIt

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's the opposite way around. The government doesn't give a fuck what the masses think, they censor because they're lobbied by people with money. Big tech censors because they're all controlled by the ADL, the ADL controls them all because they're jews who are blood related to the jews who own Blackrock. Blackrock has people on the boards of every publically traded company.

Power doesn't flow from random unorganised, unwashed masses. It flows from organised people with extreme amounts of wealth.

Why did the internet go from being edgy to ultra progressive in the span of 10 years? by sneako in AskSaidIt

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Woke stuff costs them profits so why do they do it according to capitalism?

No it doesn't. It's long term social engineering designed to make people more consumeristic.

No god? More consumption. No community? More consumption. No offspring? More consumption. Move more money into the hands of women? More consumption.

The list is endless, everything that is 'progressive', libertinist etc ultimately just leads to making people more consumerist. In the short term there are sometimes mini-boycotts when a brand does something outrageous, but what realistically is going to happen? Every single company HAS to be progressive because Finance demands this, therefore every single business you buy from is 'Woke'. There is no avoiding this for 99%+ of the population, 'go woke go broke' is nonsense cope for conservatives to feel better about the fact that the society they thought they live in doesn't actually exist and instead you just have jews and psychopathic capitalists raping your land and your children figuratively and literally.

But yes your point is also a portion of it, it works as a defence mechanism by making the population more deracinated and atomised as well as polarised along stupid lines.

Why did the internet go from being edgy to ultra progressive in the span of 10 years? by sneako in AskSaidIt

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah they're just socially engineering people into being better consumers. Easy way to increase the size of a market is to increase the Lifetime Value of each customer by increasing how much they want to consume or by adding new customers (immigration).

If you learn about Time Preference then look at what all 'Woke' stuff promotes. It's basically encouraging people to be more and more impulsive/high time preference so they're more shallow, materialistic, consumeristic etc. 'But Markimus, what does gay stuff have to do with this?' look at how consumeristic gay lifestyles are, also these people have no reason to own anything because they won't pass it onto anyone, gays and such are the perfect Civilians for the capitalist world. Own nothing, be happy. Consume endlessly, have hatred for family, faith, self-reliance, asceticism etc.

The ROI of the ADL's control of the internet is huge for the jewish community and capitalists. They're simultaneously socially engineering people to be as easily controlled by jews as possible, whilst also making them ultra-consumers.

I was/am targeted by Canada's Active measures program by poweruser in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no idea, i dont use saidit on my phone

Do you think the far right has any future, when young Whites are overwhelmingly leftist? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah Mr Bond's song Fascist

Do you think the far right has any future, when young Whites are overwhelmingly leftist? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the only genuine incels are east asians

'genuine incels' constitute like less than 1% of incels/virgins. All of them are mentalcels except the tiny minority who are deformed/disabled to an extreme degree where people are scared or repulsed when they see them.

Do you think the far right has any future, when young Whites are overwhelmingly leftist? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From the way she acted I knew she want a fascist

Is France in the worst state compared to other White nations? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's like 5'6/170cm

Would Nick Fuentes and the Christian Nationalist/America First movement be more successful if it was PROTESTANT instead of CATHOLIC? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think so. Most of these guys are incels, and most incel forums are filled with non-whites. Most the non-white Christian incels are Catholics, then the white zoomer incels who grew up without really any religion just use the TradCath label as a cope. 'I'm not an incel, I'm against degeneracy bro, I'm saving my purity for marriage bro you gotta believe me'.

Where is the evidence for the claim that the left supports pedophilia? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed

Doctors say trans kids often say they are what they think their parents want them to be. by Canbot in whatever

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why point out the Jews all the time?

People are reading 'The Transgender Industrial Complex'

Homeless Black man charged with murdering two White strangers in Oklahoma because of their race by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]Markimus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or when jewess Lizzie Grubman intentionally mowed down a crowd of people while shouting about how she hates white people, injuring 16 people. She only served 38 days in jail for attempting murder on dozens.