Actress' twitter bio includes pronouns beep/bop/boop, Twitter melts down by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 20 insightful - 10 fun20 insightful - 9 fun21 insightful - 10 fun -  (0 children)

I’m trans-Scottish. My pronouns are get/tae/fuck.

Ob/Gyn says: "You're assigned a sex at birth" by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 15 insightful - 8 fun15 insightful - 7 fun16 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

The followup will be called "I had my spine removed and I've never felt better!".

Female pub owner roasts TRA's attempt to get her cancelled by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Yes! We have as many ways to say 'contemptible fool' as we have to complain about the weather. For example in roughly increasing order of offensiveness (it's not an exact science):

  • dozy prong
  • absolute weapon
  • prat
  • plank
  • mardy arse (like wazzock, mardy is northern English, means disagreeable or irritable)
  • pillock
  • cockwomble
  • knobhead
  • nugget
  • gobshite (this is Irish but has crossed the water)
  • bellend
  • fuckwit
  • wanker

Corporate needs you to find the difference between these two pictures by assignedcopatbirth in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Is that Charles/Charlotte Clymer on the left?

I'm struggling with something I've noticed about female-dominated hobby spaces. by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Bernadette Banner

I began watching one of her videos to hear the accent and didn’t last thirty seconds:

...I don’t own a lot of clothing...

[shot of a walk-in wardrobe larger than my bathroom]

Yeah, fuck off.

The neuroscientist shattering the myth of the gendered brain by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Gina Rippon obviously has prior-held beliefs on this subject, and is only doing the research to confirm those. He is not a neutral observer here.

He? I don’t think it’s Prof Rippon’s prior-held beliefs on display here. This is the kind of stupid shit that got you banned from Reddit.

Even r/BareFootAndPregnant and r/MRAMemes got tired of you.

Study on The Psychology of Gender Critical Feminism by GenderCriticalStudy in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 19 insightful - 5 fun19 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

First post from that username, page is at freeonlinesurveys.com, seems legit.

Interested in an aneurysm? Try understanding this mumbojumbo... Gender compilation! by vitunrotta in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Testicular

Not just a man: a bawbag.

Male Midlife Crisis, 2020-Style: Coming Out as Non-binary Trans - & making your poor kid go on a bicycle trek meant to draw attention to dad's speshulness by MarkTwainiac in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

A couple of great comments, from the same person:

I think it [“non-binary”] refers to what you feel yourself to be, because how you feel doesn't alter the sex that you are.

And:

Why should you think you were gay because of what other people say to you? Whether you're gay or not depends on the sex of the people you fall in love with. I suppose if people keep on saying to say, "You're gay, you're gay," you might wonder about that and test yourself, but the crucial thing, the thing that settles it, is the direction of your attraction.

Would it not be helpful if the powers-that-be (for the 'LGBT' initialism does seem to have got itself established in the public sphere, so that even Westminster puts out a report on 'LGBT Health Needs') stopped treating being gay and being trans as though they were sort of basically the same? That might enable people like Paeton to understand themselves more readily.

The Democratic National Convention on Tuesday featured a panelist who identifies as a “nonbinary/gender transcendent mermaid Queen-King” by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

As the description says, "big names and bog performances". Freudian typo?

Time to pay up for those trans reparations you knew were coming by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Plenty of openly mocking replies too.

What are TERFS? An excellent response. by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's great to see Not The Fun Kind getting so much support in the yt comments! My fave:

What they putting in this blue hair dye these days?

Rowan Ellis styles herself a geek as well as a feminist, but asks on twitter for help with video file format problems. Hhhm.

She reminds me of the queen-bee character Amanda in Sharon Horgan and Graham Linehan's comedy Motherland. Middle-class, patronisingly superior. In that show Diane Morgan plays her opposite Liz, and NTFK includes a clip of another Morgan character, absurdist middlebrow documentary presenter Philomena Cunk, in her response video. Here's the whole thing:

It's easy to see how these fearsome and almighty genitals convinced generations of men that they were superior.

Piers Clashes With Trans Supporter Over JK Rowling's Controversial New Book | Good Morning Britain by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 24 insightful - 3 fun24 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

They mirror each other. Butterworth is the absolute prong who a couple of years ago [edit: in 2012] took a black delegate's place at a national student LGBT conference because he suddenly identified as black after failing to bag the seat by virtue of identifying as Jewish. And he of course writes for Penis News. Just as Morgan's job is to trigger millenials, Butterworth only appears because he'll trigger the gammons, not because he has anything meaningful to say. Their function is to put eyeballs in front of ads. God forbid they'd get a female guest on to discuss JKR. Who'd watch that? (sarcasm)

Male Criminals Currently Being Housed or Seeking Placement in Women’s Prison by ANIKAHirsch in GenderCriticalGuys

[–]anonymale 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Poster is a Reddit edgelord. Only came here during a recent 3-day ban from Reddit.

Study on The Psychology of Gender Critical Feminism by GenderCriticalStudy in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Aaand it’s gone.

Kyle Rittenhouse's mother by ImPiqued1111111 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

in light of the fact that the extreme majority of mass shooters are male...

Looks at the males here hijacking a thread to defend a mass shooter.

TiF is really pleased to get mistaken for a man by doctors. When TiF is nearly killed because doctors think she's a man it's all their fault. by jet199 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 77 insightful - 3 fun77 insightful - 2 fun78 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

"Few groups experience such significant barriers to healthcare.."

Er, hello?

Doctors missed my endometriosis for 17 years

A woman's delayed diagnosis led to a hysterectomy and bowel resection.

Women with endometriosis 'finally being believed'

This sounds positive, but the mean time to diagnosis is still seven years for a condition affecting 10% of women. These two articles are mercifully free of “uterus-havers”, but in the second link's embedded video an awkward-looking male doctor talks about a 'gender pain gap'.

J.K. Rowling and the White Supremacist History of “Biological Sex” by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Then there's the second bit which seems to me to be along the same likes as Simone de Beauvoir's "One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman." I am unsure if TRAs deliberately misinterpret these critiques of socialisation or if legitimately they just don't understand.

With apologies to Upton Sinclair, it is difficult to get a TIM/TRA to understand something when his glittery gender specialness, lady-penis access rights and career depend on his not understanding it. Also many of them are as thick as pigshit.

This just appeared in my recommendations, TRA’s are transitioning dogs now? by LoveNotPorn in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

...and published in 2014. Maybe get off youtube for a while and read about the pernicious effects of its recommendation algorithm.

UK Law Commission: Misogyny should become a hate crime in England and Wales. by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You knew there was a 'but' though, didn't you?

Following a review of hate crime laws, the Law Commission said the majority of evidence it had seen related to misogyny but it would consult on whether “sex or gender” as a protected characteristic should cover women and men or women only.

Collection of melodramatic phrases you've heard/read repeated incessantly by TRAs by SnowAssMan in GenderCriticalGuys

[–]anonymale 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Trans people need trans political representation!" - If TIMs are women, then women already represent them. Similarly, men already represent TIFs.

Piers Clashes With Trans Supporter Over JK Rowling's Controversial New Book | Good Morning Britain by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Also, mate, as you know "gammons" is an ageist, sexist and racist slur meant to belittle, demonize and slag off an entire chunk of the British population. Not cool.

Are you serious? Come on. It's an insult invented by white people to mock [edit: white] people with different politics, not people perceived as racially different. The fact that they tend to respond with exactly the outrage they gleefully deride 'snowflakes' for just makes it all the funnier.

I cannot escape... Gender nonsense on a BASS GUITAR subreddit! by RedditHatesLesbians in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This reminded me of a track with an awesome bassline: ‘Notice Me’, New Model Army

Who told him that it mattered?

Who told him that anyone cared?

He's got an overgrown sense of his own importance

No one's really bothered round here

THE GUARDIAN does it again - How stunning & brave transgenders single-handedly saved the UK during COVID lockdown, or something... by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's kind but I'm not looking for compliments. I want to draw attention to what heroism really looks like. It looks like a tired woman doing the shopping at ten pm after her shift so her kids can eat breakfast tomorrow, running the gauntlet of maskless idiots in the supermarket. Not a stunning and brave person in perfect makeup sighing at the thought of a day of Zoom meetings.

THE GUARDIAN does it again - How stunning & brave transgenders single-handedly saved the UK during COVID lockdown, or something... by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 27 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

FFS. I do healthcare work in people’s homes and have done throughout the pandemic. Like most key workers across public services and in retail, most of my workmates are women. When they finish their shift, which for about half of them is the sole income in their household, they go back to their second unpaid job, caring for their kids or parents or both. Hoping they haven’t brought covid home with them.

People doing the same job as us have been threatened and assaulted locally, targeted for wearing healthcare uniform or PPE outside. All victims female. All perps male. That’s the story, not a drama teacher sitting safe at home behind a fucking laptop.

The neuroscientist shattering the myth of the gendered brain by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Dreary tradwifing edgelord temporarily banned from Reddit. Take a look at the Reddit & Saidit profiles. Needs to believe that ladybrain makes tradwifing the proper activity for women. Therefore Prof Rippon, like other women who say things that poster doesn't like, must be trans. Hence the weird jaw comment in line with similar comments on Reddit.

Why are people offended by generalizations? by eddyelric in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

When you're talking about abuse in poor communities, like sexual harassment by refugees and liberals jump out and claim you're a fascist, neo-con, bigot for even bring up that issues. Muslim then talk about how YOU'RE the one making them look bad by pointing out this behaviour, as if their behaviour doesn't speak for themselves.

If you're going to say something contentious, be ready to back it up with facts. If that is going to be a problem for you, maybe don't say it. For example, you write that sexual harassment by Muslims and refugees (you seem to believe that all refugees are Muslims) is a general problem needing no supporting evidence. I'm not surprised people get angry with you.

I had a sudden worry that I need to share... by LesbiSilly in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Same with the Capitol One hacker

Thank you! I never saw a photo of him, and it didn’t occur to me at the time that the obvious mental instability was glitter-related. Speaking of instability I wonder whether those companies which hire TiMs over women might come to regret it because of that kind of behaviour.

So much for an Olive Branch by SterlingRoark in GenderCriticalGuys

[–]anonymale 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My mistake was explaining my other beliefs when asked.

You did not explain your position on gender, in a sub called “gendercritical” (not “transcritical”). For example, when just_lesbian_things wrote:

If you think there's more to being a woman than basic biology; if you believe in gender roles or other ridiculous gender propaganda then you're no different than the crazy trans males you claim to be against.

...you could have set out your views on gender. But you didn’t, so don’t blame the group for reaching the obvious conclusion that you are no different from conservative men in general.

Labour MP Rosie Duffield puts out surrender statement by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rosie Duffield made a historic speech drawing on her own experience of coercive control and domestic violence, which got international press coverage. Returning to the subject this year she branded domestic abusers as misogynist cowards. Now packs of them have made her life and job impossible. We know what she’s up against. Has she surrendered, or reached the limits of what she and her family can endure personally? Does she have credible intelligence that her safety is at risk?

I believe that the creepoids targeting her for abuse have selected her because they know she has been abused before. We know how they think, how they select victims. “She must have deserved it before, she deserves it now.”

We see this. The public sees it too.

[edit:linked to actual speech]

I know its been discussed before, but I need clarification again - why is Transgender so much different than someone saying they are Transracial? I understood before - gender is not biological, etc. but now with the blurring of biology within this ideology I am confused with this argument. by lunarenergy8 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The para-esoteric Indianess of Plastic Shamanism creates a neocolonial miniature with multilayered implications. First and foremost, it is suggested that the passé Injun elder is incapable of forwarding their knowledge to the rest of the white world. Their former white trainee, once thoroughly briefed in Indian spirituality, represents the truly erudite expert to pass on wisdom. This rationale, once again, reinforces nature-culture dualisms. The Indian stays the doomed barbaric pet, the Indianized is the eloquent and sophisticated medium to the outer, white world. Silenced and visually annihilated like that, the Indian retreats to prehistory, while the Plastic Shaman can monopolize their culture.

Dagmar Wernitzig, Europe's Indians, University Press of America, 2007, cited in Wikipedia's article on plastic shamanism

I know its been discussed before, but I need clarification again - why is Transgender so much different than someone saying they are Transracial? I understood before - gender is not biological, etc. but now with the blurring of biology within this ideology I am confused with this argument. by lunarenergy8 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

From the article:

I suggest that Dolezal offers an important opportunity for us to think seriously about how society should treat individuals who claim a strongly felt sense of identification with a certain race. When confronted with such an individual, how should we respond?

The Lakota nation declared war on them, after decades of their and other nations' polite requests to new agers and hippies to leave them alone went unheard. The resulting howls of narcissistic rage should be very familiar to GCers. (NAFPS stands for New Age Frauds and Plastic Shamans, a long-running project dedicated to documenting and combatting cultural appropriation).

Who's your favourite/most informative/well written/realistic feminist character in movies/series? Or what is the best story about such a character (even if they're not the protagonist)? by vitunrotta in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mulan is transgender too now?

waves glitter wand I HAVE MADE IT SO

Handmaid's Tale: Is this intentional or unintentional? by Rationalmind in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL, you're really fucking reaching there.

Speaking of first-lady coats, you will recall this, worn by the large child who used to occupy the first lady's seat. Intentional?

If Twitter was run by conservatives by joijoijoijoijo in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll take the bunch that wants to keep women's spaces for women

Kinder, Küche, Kirche, right? Conservatives are the mirror image of TRAs. Both expect and enforce conformity to stereotypes.

Even the Observer editorial on the Tavistock judgment bows to reality. by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm hoping for a mass ragequit among the 338 Guardian staff who signed a letter protesting about Suzanne Moore (without daring to mention her name).

Calling all feminist fact checkers! by SweetBabyCheeses in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Newstalk - Stella O'Malley on the Tavistock ruling by jet199 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some background on Stella O’Malley and the situation in Ireland

As a child growing up in Offaly, Stella O’Malley was firmly convinced she was a boy.

Had she been born only half a decade later, she tells the programme: ‘I’m absolutely certain that I would have transitioned.’

In Ireland, hormonal, psychological or surgical intervention is not available to kids under 16, but they can be referred for assessment and treatment in the UK.

The Crumlin gender clinic in Dublin refers Irish kids to GIDS. I wonder if Barbie Kardashian is an alumnus?

Tavistock & Portman GIDS - no more puberty blockers or hormones for U16s without court order, pending appeal of Bell vs Tavistock by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The NHS refused me a vasectomy at 21 because I was too young and might change my mind. But "Double mastectomy at 20, you say? Step this way".

UK High Court rules on puberty blockers for under-16s. VICTORY FOR CLAIMANTS! by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree that the Mirror headline spins the meaning of the judgment wildly, just by missing out the word ‘only’, but the judgment does not say

...that kids under 16 cannot possibly understand what the treatment will do to them because at that age they do not have the capacity.

See para 151. Rather than ban puberty blockers and hormones altogether for kids the court ruled on how Gillick competence applies to them. Para 138 sets out specifically what a child must ‘understand, retain and weigh up’ in order to be considered able to give meaningful consent. The court also says that the child must understand these for both puberty blockers and hormones as they are part of the same treatment pathway. It is a very strict set of criteria which I doubt GIDS has any chance of showing it can meet for any child currently on its books.

UK High Court rules on puberty blockers for under-16s. VICTORY FOR CLAIMANTS! by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Statement from Keira Bell:

...this fight is not yet over. I would like to personally call on professionals and clinicians to create better mental health services and models to help those dealing with gender dysphoria to reconcile with their sex. And furthermore I call on society to accept those who do not conform to sex stereotypes, not to push them into a life of drugs and concealment from who they truly are. This means stopping the homophobia, the misogyny and the bullying of those that are different.

Today I am delighted to see that common sense has prevailed and to see a reinstatement of safeguarding for children.

Standing on Keira's left is Susan Evans, the original claimant in this case, who worked as a psychotherapist at the Tavistock clinic. Apart from everything else she, Keira and Mrs A have achieved today, they've also won vindication for the many GIDS staff who have tried to express their concerns for over a decade now, often finding they had no choice but to resign.

Resource google document (urgent please!) by anda in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no way for the creator of a public Google doc to see via the Google Docs interface who's opened the document, even if the person opening it is signed in to a Google account at the time. See this article for more detail:

Explicitly shared [to a finite list of email addresses] documents show the name and avatar of users who have currently opened the document. It also shows a full history of edits made by each user. In contrast, publicly shared documents show placeholder animal profiles such as “Anonymous Badger,” “Anonymous Kraken” and “Anonymous Camel” to represent users who are currently viewing the document.

You can test this for yourself with two Google accounts and two web browsers (e.g. Edge and Internet Explorer). One account will create the document in the first browser, and the second account will view it in the second browser. Doing it this way keeps the two sessions separate.

In the first browser, sign into your first Google account, make a Google doc and make it public:

  • Go to docs.google.com and start a blank document. Give it a title and some garbage text if you want.

  • Click Share at the top right. A popup will appear giving you some options.

  • Click change to anyone with the link.

  • Click Copy link and then Done. Leave this window open for convenience. You will be looking at the document again in a moment.

In the second web browser go to docs.google.com and sign in to your second Google account.

  • Paste your document's url into the address bar. When the document opens, you'll see a round icon left of the Share button representing the document's creator. Hovering over it will reveal the name associated with your first, creator, Google account.

  • Leave that second browser window open and switch back to the first browser. You will see a different round icon left of the Share button in your document. Hovering over it will reveal a placeholder label as in the article I linked to above, not the name of your second, viewer, Google account.

If you want you can sign out of Google in your second browser, reopen the document, and see how that affects the pseudonymous placeholder you see in your first browser. It will probably change, but will still be pseudonymous.

I wrote at the top that the Google Docs interface won't reveal to a document creator anything about its viewers. But a malicious document can contain links which seem to point somewhere useful but actually go to a malicious domain which might record the ip address of viewers or try to install malware. Google Docs tries to help here: its default behaviour is that a click on a link in a document will show the url that link actually points to, and you have to click again to open the link. In Google Docs go to Tools>Preferences to check this is switched on.

tldr: creators of public google docs cannot see who views them, but viewers can see who created them. But you still need to be sure you trust links embedded in public Google docs before you click them.

Suzanne Moore: ‘I was betrayed and bullied for saying that women should not be silenced’ by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Research article: Female hunters of the early Americas by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You seem to think you are so clever, powerful and omniscient that you can can read the minds of strangers on the internet...

The irony.

Research article: Female hunters of the early Americas by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...not as clear to others as they seem to be to yourself.

It's clear to anyone with a reasonable grasp of words like 'ethnography'. If I spelled it out for you, I expect you'd take that as condescension.

...it's very clear that a forthright woman expressing her views really sticks in your craw.

LOL, tell that to my wife and sisters. What sticks in my craw is that your response to this paper is egregiously wrong because you haven't understood the first sentence of the abstract. Guessing (wrongly) at what I'm feeling will not help you understand it.

Research article: Female hunters of the early Americas by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How is challenging a direct statement that I quoted verbatim "arguing against strawmen"? What have I "misread"?

That statement.

Research article: Female hunters of the early Americas by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm curious, do you tell men whose posts you take issue with to "relax"? Or do you reserve such condescension only for women?

If, despite having been to college, they misread things and start rantily arguing against strawmen, yes.

Research article: Female hunters of the early Americas by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...this sexist old shibboleth...the male-concocted, male-centering idea that big-game hunting done exclusively by males was once a/the principal way of providing food...

Relax, no one's saying that.

I suggest the 2003 film "The Snow Walker."

Of course women's knowledge and skills have over and over again meant the difference between flourishing and extinction. But that film's based on a short story by the totally unreliable Farley Mowat, the Canadian national icon nicknamed Hardly Know-it in the Northwest Territories, where he is remembered as a bullshitter. In a catalogue of his papers he wrote this:

On occasions when the facts have particularly infuriated me, Fuck the Facts!

Research article: Female hunters of the early Americas by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From the abstract:

We present an archeological discovery and meta-analysis that challenge the man-the-hunter hypothesis. Excavations at the Andean highland site of Wilamaya Patjxa reveal a 9000-year-old human burial (WMP6) associated with a hunting toolkit of stone projectile points and animal processing tools...analyses indicate that this early hunter was a young adult female...the earliest and most secure hunter burial in a sample that includes 10 other females in statistical parity with early male hunter burials. The findings are consistent with nongendered labor practices in which early hunter-gatherer females were big-game hunters.

'KINGDOM OF WOMEN' STUDY REVEALS THE REAL COST OF TRADITIONAL GENDER ROLES by jet199 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I believe there's been similar findings in the work place.

This article deals with the Mosuo study and one on the pay gap for female STEM graduates in the US:

Internalized gender-focused attitudes affect health, career prospects

Jazz Jenning's so-called "battle scars". Have you seen this picture? by Cacator in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...I don't get why you're placing so much stock into what anonymous respondents to the NCTE survey said... ...the NCTE survey you rely on...

I didn't know I was relying on it. I thought I was exploring its data after you cited a statistic derived from it.

Also, you are mixing up non-surgical procedures - hair removal and voice therapy - with surgeries.

Mixing them up, or exploring the context as fully as that survey's data would allow? I'm not trying to catch you out or score points here, we agree that transgender ideology is immensely harmful and much more so to women and girls.

Thank you for providing the evidence I asked you for. That is a smaller minority than I have seen reported before. Your posts would be so much more powerful and useful to others if you substantiated claims unprompted, especially claims with high peaking power like the relative rarity of genital surgery for TIMs. Most of the people I talk to about it have no idea, and are much more likely to go immediately from 'well they just want to feel safe' to 'no fucking way pal' if they see good evidence. Nullius in verba and all that.

Trans man loses UK legal battle to register as his child's father. UK supreme court refuses appeal, considers child's right to the truth more important than 'validation'. by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...and BTW the only British men with a 'tache like that are the ones who've grown them so they can bullshit you in the pub about being in the SAS.

Jazz Jenning's so-called "battle scars". Have you seen this picture? by Cacator in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The trans research org the Williams Institute reported in 2015 that the vast majority of males who claim to be trans - 88% - have not had any genital surgeries.

Sure it was them? I couldn't find that on their site, but I did find a 2015 survey report by the National Centre for Transgender Equality which features similar statistics. pp 100-103, table 7.5, figs 7.14, 7.15.

Since then, the number of trans-identified people has skyrocketed. But there has been no corresponding uptick in genital surgeries on males. So probably 95% or so of TIMs have their genitals intact.

Isn't 88% bad enough? If the total number of TIMs is increasing, what is the evidence that a greater proportion of them don't or won't have genital surgery?

When "gender confirmation surgeries" are spoken of for TIMs nowadays it almost always means facial feminization surgeries; tracheal shaves; having sacs of fluid or gel implanted in the chest to resemble women's breasts; lip, butt and hip injections with fillers; dental contouring, etc.

For the male respondents those procedures are all less common and less desired (facial feminisation only very slightly less desired) than genital surgery. The most common are non-surgical voice therapy and hair removal, the latter four times as common. This still means ~60% of the TIM respondents have beard stubble, mind.

The most common "gender confirming surgery" being done today by far is double mastectomy on young females.

The survey bears this out: it's about three times more common that female respondents have had mastectomies than males have had genital surgery. Table 7.4, fig 7.12.

This survey had a relatively high number of respondents: 27,715 (p. 43) but it was an online survey so the usual problems with non-representative sampling, self-selection and self-reporting apply. The authors partially acknowledge this (p. 26):

Although the intention was to recruit a sample that was as representative as possible of transgender people in the U.S., it is important to note that respondents in this study were not randomly sampled and the actual population characteristics of transgender people in the U.S. are not known. Therefore, it is not appropriate to generalize the findings in this study to all transgender people.

They do not seem to have considered the possibility that answering surveys like this could be a way for those with special sparkly genderfeels to reinforce them by exaggerating experiences of harassment or suicidality, for example.

Mary Wollstonecraft sculpture covered up with ‘woman’ t-shirt amid feminism row by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It looks like a doll mounted on a foil-wrapped dead tree. The fundraisers should have known what would happen. Hambling's A Conversation with Oscar Wilde turns him into a creature made of cigarette smoke and a melted Curly Wurly. I love Hambling's paintings but many of her sculptures are dreadful shite.

BBC radio 4 - Is TERF a slur? by jet199 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Does the pope shit in the woods? From the two who contended that

feminism is for everyone

I kept hearing

my feminism is unique to me

which sounds an awful lot like 'feminism is what I say it is'.

Sam Smith: “It’s been really, really hard to see all the backlash and the amount of people that are still so unsupportive of gender nonconforming people and trans people all around the world” by MinisterOfTerfery in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sam Smith:

...gender non-conforming...

Also Sam Smith:

I want kids. I want all of it. I want to be with the kids, watch them grow and be with them every day. I want to be mummy.’

The thing that really gets me is that he could have taken an admirable [edit: and actually gender nonconforming] stance. He could have shown young kids that it is ok to be male and wear what you want, feel what you feel, say what you feel, be a full-time parent and love it. But apparently marketing said no.

(Ranty) DAE feel almost-revulsion any time they hear the word "Privilege" anymore? by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Liberal privilege checking displaces and prevents class analysis, whether economic- or sex- class. Therefore it should be refused.

Some evidence that some men can have "women's" brain by Kai_Decadence in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

New Scientist is generally ok, I find. The studies that article mentions also rely on the assumption that gendered behaviour is innate, which is also a vital assumption for TRAs. As FlippyKing says, silly idea. Gina Rippon, professor of cognitive neuroimaging, has written an accessible book, Gender and Our Brains, which explores this area. I haven't read it yet, but it's likely to be more up to date and less palatable than that article to your TIM. Here's a review.

Contrary to what early coverage of brain imaging technology claimed, neuroscientists no longer believe that specific types of activities and aptitudes are dealt with solely in discrete parts of the brain. Instead, the brain is a network of networks. It is also extremely “plastic,” constantly changing to reflect whatever its owner experiences and does...It makes no sense, Rippon argues, to speak of brains as fixed organs when they can be changed literally at will.

Much of the rest of Gender and Our Brains describes how exquisitely sensitive to social input the brain is—especially in infancy and childhood—and how pervasively gendered that input is. “A gendered world will produce a gendered brain,” she writes.

Irish media outlet might face civil and criminal prosecution for revealing truth about violent TiM Barbie Kardashian bc TWAW!!!! by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gript.ie is a media outlet in the same sense that a drug dealer is a pharmaceutical outlet.

I had not appreciated how mendacious this shower of fascist bastards are. I won't link to it, but the site features a video attempting to discredit Catherine Corless, the Galway historian who uncovered the horror of Tuam children's home.

Eight hundred children of unwed mothers died there over thirty-six years, with only a handful having a record of burial. She found where the rest had gone: into a disused sewage tank. The [edit] resulting explosion of public outrage forced the Irish state to form a commission of inquiry which reports regularly. Its final report is due on Oct 30th. [end edit] There is to be a thorough forensic investigation of the whole site. None of this would have, could have happened without Catherine Corless' relentless dedication.

The investigation released its fifth interim report in March 2019. It details the investigation into the site by forensic archaeologists, civil engineers and others into the structure the children's remains were found in. The report makes it completely clear that this was not a crypt, but an effluent tank. The arseholes at gript take a few of Corless' words, and a few of the report's words, and in order to make a cheap anti-abortion point portray her as contradicting the report after endorsing it. Their contempt for women in general and Catherine Corless in particular ought to show that these fuckers only report on transgender cases because they like all fascists want to reinforce gender, not criticise it or minimise its harms.

Uncritical boosting of a fascist site's dubious claims of persecution only makes it easier for TRAs to claim that their radfem critics are in bed with the far right. For that reason you should remove this thread, BEB.

Adrian Harrop Locks Down His Twitter Claiming Harassment by alttrawl in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sauce, goose, gander.

edit: assuming harassment is the real reason. There's no way the cops or GMC could be interested in his past tweets, which are all entirely benign.

Irish media outlet might face civil and criminal prosecution for revealing truth about violent TiM Barbie Kardashian bc TWAW!!!! by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gript.ie is a media outlet in the same sense that a drug dealer is a pharmaceutical outlet. There are still three articles on this case up on the Irish Independent site, and one one the Limerick Leader. All state that the violent offender in question was born male, identifies as a woman and wants to be in a female prison. It would appear possible to report accurately on this story without breaching the court order mentioned in the linked article. The purpose of the latter appears to be ultra righty tighties positioning themselves as noble paladins of the truth. Fascists, however, uniformly hate women and aren't good at hiding it. Take a look at gript's stance on abortion.

Abortion rights in danger (UK) by GCwarrior in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Would it have been hard for you to type that unprompted?

HRT

It's not replacement if the hormones weren't there in the first place. This is one of those concepts TRAs have stolen.

Trans group start petition to create an option for “non-binary” on COVID test - because your pronouns are what's really important when dealing w a deadly virus by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The numpty responsible is getting a well-deserved roasting. My favourite:

Because the gender fantasy of some spoiled, entitled, bellend really matters when testing for a virus? Give your head a wobble FFS.

Abortion rights in danger (UK) by GCwarrior in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK, I'll bite. I'm not willing to sit through an hour of TRA chatter though. I got a few minutes in during which they fail to mention the original lead claimant in the judicial review, Susan Evans, a psychotherapist who worked at the Tavistock clinic and later became a governor of the NHS trust which operates it [edit: I got that wrong, her husband Marcus Evans was a governor. He resigned over its treatment of gender-dysphoric kids].

Is the supposed danger to abortion rights something to do with this argument, promoted by Penis News and Mermaids? That if under-18s are ruled unable to consent to hormone treatment, then their ability to consent to contraception and abortion without parental consent (called 'Gillick competence' in English law after the litigant whose challenge to this failed in the 80s) will also be challenged in court by the religious right.

It is true that Paul Conrathe, the solicitor acting for the claimants, has acted in various anti-abortion cases. As I understand it his argument in this case is that Gillick competence is being stretched too far here by the nature of the treatment (experimental, poor evidence base, etc), and its consequences (infertility, lack of improved mental health, etc.), not the age of the patients.

Am I close? If not you will need to give me a clue.

Detailed takedown of the person spearheading the bullying against Rosie Duffield by alttrawl in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Glinner's article on Peto is now the top google search result for "heather peto". Excellent!

"THE RADICAL NOTION was founded in 2020 to create a space for the resurgent wave of feminist thinking and activism. This not-for-profit quarterly magazine is run by an all-women collective of radical and socialist feminists." by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From Jane Clare Jones:

Really really pleased to announce that the new quarterly feminist magazine I’ve been working on is now taking subscriptions! The first print edition will be out at the end of the month.

Detailed takedown of the person spearheading the bullying against Rosie Duffield by alttrawl in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Rosie Duffield is everything Heather ( formerly Warren) Peto will never be: a woman, a successful politician, the owner of a heart.

BBC To Tell Story Of Sexual Predator Jimmy Savile In TV Series by radmoon in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part of Savile's MO was to cultivate officials who could allow him access to victims, and ensure that they feared him mightily. He used a mix of [edit: charm,] direct physical intimidation and hints that he had kompromat on them. They knew he always had at the very least the ability to ensure that they would suffer indelible guilt by association if he went down. The other part of his MO was to choose victims society holds in contempt: mainly girls. That is how he was able to operate in plain sight for decades. We know this because of the numerous public enquiries into his offending that have taken place since he died.

On the other hand, pizzagate is just some horseshit cooked up on 4chan. The pizzagate/qanon mobs sending death threats to pizza company employees are animated by exactly the same cult-like psychodynamics at work in the heads of TRAs threatening noncompliant women with death.

BBC To Tell Story Of Sexual Predator Jimmy Savile In TV Series by radmoon in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

12-year-old TiF with Asperger's suicide linked to transgender clinic - damn them. by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jayden Lowe was eighteen, not twelve. Helen Webberly, the doctor responsible for prescribing puberty blockers to her, and also to a twelve-year-old, cannot now practice medicine in the UK after being convicted in 2018 of practicing illegally. She now prescribes puberty blockers to British children via a company based in Hong Kong.

SNL Shits on JKR and Whole Other Misogynistic Monologue by Anon123 in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What an ignorant fuckwit. May as well have been hosted by Bill Barr. Never heard of Florynce Kennedy?

Reclaiming #adulthumanfemale. https://twitter.com/Cambellxo/status/1315382302160101377?s=20 by Lady_Montgomery in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...aaaaand the top tweet for that hashtag is

Biological men reclaiming #adulthumanfemale because apparently the definition of "woman" is transphobic. Just let women be, mate.

(slow clap) Great job there, absurd porn-sick man.

Mob ‘justice’: How one feminist’s simple Tweet enraged transgender activists and saw her sacked from her dream job by alttrawl in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We don't need to refer to a Kremlin propaganda organ to get the facts on this case. rt only publishes stories like this because it fits into one of the Kremlin's overarching propaganda themes: that the West has become decadent and effeminate because of feminism, while Russia embodies the strength of the traditional family. This narrative does not distinguish the T from the LGB, portraying them as equally perverted.

https://www.womenarehuman.com/latest-chapter-of-cancel-culture-in-trans-activists-twitter-war-on-women/

Male-pattern crime latest: UK TRA and police employee Zoe Watts arrested on firearms and explosives charges. by anonymale in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Watts is evidently a fucking lunatic. Posts videos of himself making weapons for use on 'bigots', i.e. people who say things he doesn't like.

Update: cops found 'what appeared to be a shotgun' in his car.

Scottish poet Jenny Lindsay has to flee Edinburgh due to threats after saying biological sex is real by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not wishing to minimise what Jenny Lindsay's been through but she was warned by the police that there were credible threats to her safety, rather than personally threatened. She tweets that she had already decided to leave by the time the police contacted her:

Ah, I have to correct this: I had already decided to leave due to 'the atmosphere in my sector.' The sole call from police was honestly such a minor thing its irritating to see it reported this way! Essay is best for full story.

And:

...leaving Edinburgh not linked to police call. It was troubling, of course! The entire thing was. Is.

Lindsay's essay on what was done to her is called An Anatomy of a Hounding.

US play canceled as it's about to go on because author had "transphobic'" comments on personal FaceBook by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]anonymale 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The playwright is Carolyn Gage, a renowned lesbian feminist. She's been subject to TRA censorship for years, despite making room in her work for trans identities. Nothing but total submission is acceptable to them.