this will be no less than the third time I quote your own words, so I'm starting to naturally question your cognative uptake. Sorry, I don't mean to, and didn't start off this back and forth that way... but come on!

There are studies that show that religiosity predicts child molestation. Religious Affiliations Among Adult Sexual Offenders

religiosity was linked to a higher number of sex offense victims and more convictions for sex offenses. Those sex offenders who reported regular church attendance, a belief in supernatural punishment, and religion as important in their daily lives had more known victims, younger victims, and more convictions for sex offenses than the sex offenders who reported irregular or no church attendance and no or less intense allegiance to religious beliefs and practices.

And there's a stack of literature that shows that LGBTQ are not more likely to molest children than the general population.

For example: Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals?

Those bolded links are yours, that you commented to lolz or lulz with and the links were both to gov sites, one being the NIH.

it doesn't talk about techniques

It's all scattered among different articles - external links in "Perceptual hashing" page, algorithms section in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_image_search , some vague description in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoDNA (this one is big: "As of 2022, PhotoDNA was widely used by online service providers for their content moderation efforts including Google's Gmail, Twitter, Facebook, Adobe Systems, Reddit, Discord.")

sure, when they can't molest or flash people of their chosen (not at birth) gender, everyone must hear the outrage of a thousand snowflakes unharmoniously falling.

There must be a lot of pussies in Canada.

Very cool, I did it too