I am the original comment. I am on topic - the point is that it's difficult to legally punish false allegations simply based on "No proof" because that isn't evidence that the allegation is false and it discourages other possible, future allegations.

If you're trying to say that you want me to keep the examples relevant specifically to HR, then it kind of remains the same argument - If it requires evidence, then I can corner someone in a bathroom and threaten to murder them at work, because it's just them and me in the bathroom. That's what I mean by HR having their hands tied in this regard because they face backlash if there's a complaint that they didn't action, but they also face backlash if there's a complaint that they do action and it turns out to be false.

Go read original comment here, stay on topic, don't create scenarios to defend false accusers.

Two were dual citizens. Usual suspects from a small middle-East country infamous for housing pedophiles escaping from the US and being dispropotionally involved in shenanigans involving corruption as a whole.

that sort of rules-lawyering is also how the trans activists dethroned the radfems: if wombxn really were completely abjected victims, the worst in human history, with all the legal standing of a discarded sex toy, how do they also have an iron grip on campus HR departments, divert sexual assault allegations to Title IX star chambers, veto a men's center with 1% the budget of its equivalent, get multimillion budgets for women's shelters, write the laws, advise the courts, write the mandatory training sessions for all the businesses as well as schools?

they also came up with the whole "my individual experience as a middle-class academic professional is the only universal standard," "everyone must to defer to my contradictory and self-serving whims," "we have to be in control of every institution," "you're a traitor to the gender for disagreeing with our niche theories/having any different politics," frankly it never ended: but to many this was an opportunity to be TAKEN

so everyone secretly agreed they were callous, vindictive, spiteful bullies always on the witch-hunt for "oppressors" to have the campus/HR punish (an inverse of Lord Acton's law): what sort of sick bastard(ess) thinks Phil Hartman had it coming or that street kids can go starve if they have a dongle? but unfortunately the ~2014 shift just meant a new busload of psychotic bullies were given full (if secondhand) authority over mainstream media companies, universities, grade schools, law (this was also the time when "you don't need dysphoria to be trans, but we'll unalive ourselves from dysphoria if you ever disagree with us uwu" teens flooded out the older trans)

Doubt that happens. Women's false accusations are a bigger threat.