Gad Saad: Ontario College of Psychologists Have Asked Me to Re-Educate Jordan Peterson!

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-13T09:01:57+00:00

Sex is a biological thing, not something that's ... 'assigned'.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-14T18:47:28+00:00

It's not just 'the left''s pro-war stance that's peculiar.

Did you ever imagine that it would e.g. push for corporate control of information,
wanting sociopathic greed-driven businesses deciding what people get to read or not?

The current 'left' seems to be marketing-agency astroturf
actually aiming at totalitarianism.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-09T19:09:54+00:00

This is as funny, but ultimately sad, as a man asking: 'How do I explain that I’m a giraffe and not just mentally ill?'

HugodeCrevellier · 2020-09-09T09:43:10+00:00

That was so blatant.

It makes me sad to think that this poor guy probably imagines that he has good intentions.

Just as everybody thinks they themselves are not personally affected by corporate marketing and advertising (yeah, corporations are stupid to spend billions on it! :/), he likely thinks that he arrived at his views all on his own ... and that he wasn't instead manipulated/pressured into this level of imbecility by the sociopaths and their copromedia.

If only the stupid just took themselves out ... instead of trying to drag the whole society down with them.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-03-27T20:47:38+00:00

Yes.

I used to love Reddit and spent/wasted much time on it.

But then things got less and less organic, i.e. they seemed more and more manipulated/bot-ified? And their mods just went full woketard: To lie became mandatory. To tell objectively true facts became a 'bannable offence'. At this point on that site, unless you submit to agreeing with all kinds of complete bullshit (e.g. that a man pretending to be a woman is in fact a woman), you get diagnosed with some 'phobia' and/or labelled a 'hater' and then, of course, you get banned by some opinion-control inquisitors.

Sorry but ... nope.

HugodeCrevellier · 2020-12-14T17:30:53+00:00

hoax

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-08-06T12:34:19+00:00

Reddit's woke-ish totalitarian inquisition that imposes some inane ideological monoculture is why most of us here are reading and writing on saidit instead, even though saidit was launched much later, and we're re of course much fewer.

HugodeCrevellier · 2020-07-04T18:46:24+00:00

Homer expressed a similar thought through Achilles and the choice before him:

Life is not to be bought with heaps of gold.
Not all Apollo's Pythian treasures hold,
Or Troy once held, in peace and pride of sway,
Can bribe the poor possession of a day!

Lost herds and treasures we by arms regain,
And steeds unrivall'd on the dusty plain:
But from our lips the vital spirit fled,
Returns no more to wake the silent dead.

My fates long since by Thetis were disclosed,
And each alternate, life or fame, proposed;
Here, if I stay, before the Trojan town,
Short is my date, but deathless my renown:
If I return, I quit immortal praise
For years on years, and long–extended days...

Achilles, The Iliad

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-05T09:10:14+00:00

That's the kind of mass shooting, ... essentially government-sponsored-terrorism ..., that the corporate media doesn't care about.

HugodeCrevellier · 2022-09-14T07:11:27+00:00

Ukraine is essentially in a civil war.

Zelensky is a foreign agent.

He has already promised Ukraine's resources (which ostensibly belong to the Ukrainian people) to foreign private interests.

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-01-02T16:04:51+00:00

Fake-ish. Mark Twain never wrote that. The closest thing to it was:

'How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and [how] hard it is to undo that work again!'

Autobiographical dictation, 2 December 1906. Published in Autobiography of Mark Twain, Volume 2 (University of California Press, 2013)

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-23T10:50:40+00:00

Who's financing them and isn't that simply ... 'treason'?

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-05T09:47:31+00:00

Those in control of Reddit are implementing an 'Information Control' purge of users, likely to prepare for the US elections, with the reasons given for bans often being fake.

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-03-08T22:33:50+00:00

But then an Abrahamic religion stuck itself onto Neoplatonism and so goodbye to Antikythera mechanisms, etc. and hello to dogmatic superstition, obscurantism, and the eventual destruction of all advanced (thus mysterious) mechanisms, which came to be viewed as magical/satanic.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-07-06T11:06:47+00:00

Palestinians ≠ Muslims.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-15T07:30:58+00:00

Most of them?

I've recently had a decent, and civil, debate in s/politics for example.

You simply focus on interesting posts and comments.

You don't have to reply to stupid or disingenuous crap.

Voilà!

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-08-17T13:25:49+00:00

It's going to be the other way around, as through 'diversity', they're going to turn modern Belgium into Stone-Age Afghanistan.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-20T07:04:45+00:00

You'd think that one of the benefits of saidit having relatively few visitors
would be that it would make it not worth the money spamming it.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-14T08:37:37+00:00

I'm surprised that the reddit inquisition has allowed this to be posted.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-06T21:52:08+00:00

You lazily posted statements from and a link to some NASA vulgarization aimed at kids:

'Four Major Gases Contribute to the Greenhouse Effect, Number one: Carbon Dioxide.'

Have you, with this, addressed his argument, in any way?

The statements that you imagine you're somehow challenging thus
is his claims that Carbon Dioxide only constitutes 0.04 % of the Earth's atmosphere,
and that (of that 0.04 %), 3% is anthropogenic, etc.

That's what needs addressing.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-03T13:25:43+00:00

Every time RFK says something unaligned, ...
which is often, and is thus immediately attacked by sell-out/cowardly/compromised shills, ...
typically by seeking to distort/straw-man what he actually says, ...
it usually turns out that RFK was actually right.

Corporate-controlled search engines are chock-full of articles about RFK's antisemitism, for example.

But, to get a glimpse of the truth,
watch the attacks on RFK by the infamously depraved Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
where RFK gives her the actual facts, which she's not at all interested in,
as shown by her frantic attempts to prevent him from responding meaningfully,
essentially gagging him, so she can continue spreading the misleading vitriol.

https://youtu.be/PaZe_JHVx94?si=8wRKh-Qr327zHAkv

The unholy alliance of a compromised US government and sociopathic corporations,
neither working for the people,
have managed to reanimate that level of imposed-official-bullshit that had characterized the Stalinist USSR.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-08-06T12:39:25+00:00

This is the way.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-06-04T16:14:09+00:00

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/teen-suspect-murder-teacher-colleen-ritzer-left-hate-note-documents-flna2D11641586

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-06-04T16:09:53+00:00

Coming soon from Hollywood, the story of the white kid who raped and murdered his black teacher, "a poignant take on the evils of racism!". :/

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-11T11:48:21+00:00

I thought this unlikely to be the case, and yet this appears to indeed be correct.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-05T14:03:52+00:00

Reddit has become bizarre.

It's chock-full of the most disgusting pornography ('ass to mouth', etc.,), but if you say stuff like 'women are female', all hell breaks loose, the compliant/brainwashed report you and their thought-police inquisitors ban you, ... for being 'offensive'!?

It's clown world.

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-01-03T07:58:23+00:00

The second line may be misdirected anger ... comparatively few people in Kentucky voted for Biden.

HugodeCrevellier · 2020-09-12T17:21:11+00:00

Well, these are, almost by definition, not the 'best' minds ... otherwise they'd be thinking about something else.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-14T10:30:02+00:00

*we're

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-16T13:47:44+00:00

This is not specifically a Biden thing.

Both US parties serve the military-industrial complex and other shockingly corrupt financial interests and, therefore, allow the imperial ambitions of 'the Neocons'.

The main difference is one of style, where Republicans seem a tiny bit more direct, while Democrats, like Biden, tend to try to gaslight people all the way.

Other than that, it's a Coke vs Pepsi difference, ... both crappy corporate sugary drinks that are propped up by advertising/marketing, and pretty much equally bad for you.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-15T15:42:09+00:00

Yes, completely agree.

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-08-09T06:45:38+00:00

Also, 'liberals' is a misnomer, as it's meant to define those that defend (certainly not attack) liberty, the consent of the governed and equality before the law.

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-01-06T10:00:05+00:00

The St Louis Fair had 'a darker side'? :)

In any case, that the St Louis Fair should show 'types of mankind from many continents' does say 'mankind', making it thus accurate.

And African 'Pigmies' did and do exist and so did 'Head-hunters' in South-East Asia. And Ainu men did grow tremendously long beards. And as for 'dog-eaters', they did and still exist today in East Asia.

Now, the issue with human zoos was exactly the same issue that still exists with animal zoos, namely the removal of beings from their environment, to move and place them in artificial settings to be gawked at. But that Anthropology mapped humans on a greyscale from primitive to civilized is not crazy considering that Europeans were at the time discovering unquestionably primitive humans still living naked in the stone-age. Finally, religious imbeciles notwithstanding, that humans evolved from ape-like hominids is also an unquestionable fact.

Science is by method always tentative and many early anthropological theories were not complete nor fully correct. But that there exist morphological differences between (pre-'diversification') European Swedes, African Pigmies, Australian aborigines and East-Asian Ainus is not all mean-minded and unscientific. It's the current push to deny these that's dogmatically unscientific. Woke (this time) imbeciles notwithstanding, that human types do exist is similarly unquestionable.

This "documentary' is ironically closer to a P. T. Barnum version of 'history'. It's closer to catering to current sensationalist dogmata than to actual history. It does so by e.g. reversing the sequence of events and having show-people influencing the scientists, not the other way around (show-people commercializing scientists' hypotheses and pushing them to sensationalist absurdity), etc.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-23T07:45:33+00:00

One might blame the USA for spreading its insanity/idiocy into Europe ...
but one should more rightly blame Europe for letting itself be influenced
by that insanity/idiocy.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-18T14:21:23+00:00

The key seems to be that this is about the most taboo 'topics', not the most taboo 'acts'.

I'm sure that talking about the genetic differences between races/subspecies
is only considered more taboo than 'talking' about incest and paedophilia,
not 'committing' them.

One can only hope.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-11T20:40:34+00:00

At this point,
not only should Assange be immediately released,
but everyone involved in his shameful persecution should be indicted.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-10T17:49:33+00:00

It does seem so, doesn't it?

Nonetheless, there must be some hesitancy even towards saidit.
This is partly due to a certain lack of transparency about who owns/controls it.
Let's not forget that privatizing digital town squares
was done to bypass actual freedom of speech.

Eventually, a non-privately/corporately owned platform,
a publicly-owned platform, really analogous to a town square,
has to eventually be created,
where, by law and to the extent allowed by law,
e.g. freedom of speech, is implemented.

Sincere political views by actual people must be protected,
and only taken away if someone is caught shilling, spamming, advertising,
and/or committing other forms of lying for pay.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-01T10:30:29+00:00

Interesting ...
not to mention that, currently, many/most such terms have become misnomers,
with e.g. 'liberal' now indicating the very opposite of a love of liberty,
indicating, instead, a kind of astroturf pseudo-liberalism
that's actually promoting totalitarianism.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-10-30T21:51:40+00:00

Might the hasbarats be distributing the AI versions just to create doubt over it actually happening?

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-10-27T19:14:34+00:00

Scots , who are 96% white, and Christians, have been so "Diversity!" brainwashed (into inverse-racism, against themselves), that they've elected some Pakistani as their prime minister.

Yet, and sure enough, the contemptible Islamist turd that, for the sake of 'diversity', the Scotts placed in the top position of the Scottish government, now complains that the Scotts are racists(!?) and that there are too many white, i.e. Scottish, people in positions of power, ... in Scotland!!

Now, if that POS actually cared about either Scotland or even diversity, he would seek to have more (white and Christian) Scotts in position of power in Pakistan ... and not the other way around.

But no, Islamists always seem to flee their shithole homelands (ostensibly because, well, they are shitholes) and then to go to some (any remaining) civilized countries ... and then try to turn them into the same kind of shitholes they fled ... you know ... for 'diversity!''s sake. :/

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-08-05T12:56:18+00:00

Racism can be mere generalization, something between 'speciesism' (different species have different characteristics) and 'familialism' (children share characteristics with their parents). In the USA, the real ('indigenous') Americans having been essentially genocided away, the population there is no longer an ethnicity. These real Americans were replaced by assorted imported/foreign ethnicities, 'European-Americans', 'African-Americans', 'Asians-Americans', etc. So, of course, in the USA, to recognize the validity of racial/ethnic characteristics is an issue, a political(?) one, a contentious one in any case ... becoming a taboo.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-06-11T11:24:15+00:00

Mental illness becomes even more tragic if/when some industry figures an affliction can be exploited for financial gain. Unfortunately, healthy people can't be milked for money. So, some 'health' professionals will therefore encourage the delusional.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-28T22:43:06+00:00

Oh, the stupidity ... or, rather, what happens when sociopaths get to manipulate, and thus weaponize, duly compliant useful idiots (or cowards).

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-16T17:34:01+00:00

Yes, they figured that they would find WMDs because they had sold them to Hussein ... and by 'Freedom' they of course meant that destroying Iraq and murdering its people by the hundreds of thousands would free Iraqis, men, women and children, either from the drudgery of having a functioning country or [from] being alive.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-14T08:30:30+00:00

Grotesque, tragic and heartbreaking, but, since they're all going to have to 'rely on doctors for the rest of life', greed-driven sociopathic pseudo-doctors love this, as they profit from it and get to buy more expensive shit, car options, etc., so ... 'worth it!'? :/

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-13T14:35:39+00:00

Germany's scientists seem to have purposely slowed down their research on the weaponization of nuclear fission, itself a German discovery.

German physicists had, already in 1939, concluded that 'in principle atomic bombs could be made', but, Werner Heisenberg delayed and de-emphasized the possibility, as he 'did not want the Führer to get so interested that he would order great efforts immediately to make the atomic bomb'.

In September 1941, at the Heisenberg-Bohr meeting in Copenhagen, Werner Heisenberg asked Niels Bohr to ask scientists in the USA to also do as he had, to prevent 'grave consequences in the technique of war'.

When Bohr asked Heisenberg if a nuclear weapon was even possible, Heisenberg replied that he personally knew that it was. He even produced a drawing that showed how a reactor would produce the uranium or plutonium necessary to build an atom bomb. This was a very dangerous move, as it would have been considered treason.

Heisenberg furthermore informed Bohr that he was in a position to neutralize the German nuclear effort. But he also pleaded for Bohr to get 'Allied' scientists to do the same. He hoped that the international physics community could cooperate to spare the world of this horrendous weapon.

Bohr would have none of it. US teams pushed even harder to build the grotesque weapons of mass destruction. Once this was done, the USA would then use them on cities-full of civilians, women, children, etc., for no justifiable reason. The USA, far from desperate, was completely intact from the war, had suffered no civilian casualties, and was in no danger whatsoever.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-13T11:17:42+00:00

When one attempt to culturally enrich 'them bad islamophobic Europeans' conflicts with another attempt to culturally enrich 'them bad homophobic Europeans', and in the meantime, the actual (and typically quite reasonable) Europeans are at a complete loss as to what to do about the horrors being brought upon their countries, ... by fear of being labelled either islamophobic or homophobic.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-11T09:54:01+00:00

Today, for not complying with a promoted ideology, he'd similarly be banned/censored/cancelled.

Ironically, however, the currently promoted ideology is one that forces (as the only acceptable ones) views that are even more extreme than Hirschfeld's.

So if anyone today dares refer to sexual deviations (from typical/'normal' heterosexual practices) as 'deviant' (which, according to definition, they, simply, are), or as 'perversions', which they also are, again by definition, workeist neo-inquisitions will gag/ban them, preventing their 'hateful'(!?) words from being read by others, even by those who want to read them.

Book burnings are more symbolic than effective. Today's insidious 'wokequisitions' apply 'shadow'-bans, etc., on whole authors in general, not just some specific book of theirs. That's more effective than symbolic, and thus even more harmful to the free flow of ideas.

HugodeCrevellier · 2022-09-09T08:20:03+00:00

Destroying nations is the goal. WWII worked amazingly well, so the trick keeps getting used. 'Defending the National Integrity of Poland' was the excuse used to attack the Germans in WWII. Once the German people were decimated (literally) and Germany destroyed, occupied, divided and looted, Poland was of course surrendered to Stalin, the worse mass murderer of the 20th century, ... this guy. They didn't care about the Poles. They don't care about the Ukrainians.

HugodeCrevellier · 2020-09-10T12:53:44+00:00

Even Harvard has gone full retard!

HugodeCrevellier · 2020-09-03T09:49:38+00:00

Footage from 2017. The thief's name is Mohamed Ahmed Abu-Shlieba. He was caught and apprehended shortly afterwards. He pleaded guilty to evading arrest and was sentenced to 3 Years in Prison. As a side note, after his arrest, a cop, "Tu Tran" was filmed punching him in the throat and strangling him as he sat handcuffed in the cop car. He got a three-day unpaid suspension for that.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-15T08:20:54+00:00

NATO has become a dangerous anachronism,
which should have been dismantled when the Warsaw Pact was disbanded.

Europe should of course remain allied with the USA,
a former European colony after all,
which still shares many values with European civilization.

However, Europe must extricate itself from the USA's 'leadership',
which usually involves pointlessly mass-murdering people by the tens of thousands.

European foreign policy must stop being directed
by the 'Neocons' and/or other corrupt/evil forces
currently in control of the USA.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-10T19:24:06+00:00

Again, excellent points.

So, I guess that, though you're right on every point,
my own is that citizens must ... somehow ... fight to regain a balance of power
between themselves and the regimes/governments/bureaucracies
that claim to represent them, but more and more disingenuously.

I seem to agree with the old 'I'd rather a government fear its citizens than the other way around'.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-10T18:43:45+00:00

These are excellent points.

An important aspect of the USA and French revolutions
is that mass-production allowed the people
to basically have the same weapons (guns) as governments
and there were far more people than government mercenaries (police/army, etc), so ...

Before that, the expense and widescale unavailability of armour and quality weaponry
meant that e.g. a team of ten armoured knights on horseback could decimate entire villages of villeins,
something that helped prop-up feudalism.

We do now seem to be moving back towards some neo-feudal (but high-tech) situation.

Nonetheless, I wouldn't say that revolutions, or resistance to tyranny, has zero to do with violence.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-10T17:09:48+00:00

They may need them ...
but even an armed citizenry will soon present no obstacle to tyranny,
as governments will increasingly transition to drones and other automated systems,
able to kill en masse, without courage or ability, from complete mechanized safety.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-09T12:36:32+00:00

Yet another 'Swedish' issue.

Apparently, Europe, especially Nordic Europe,
must ... 'diversify'.

Gods forbid it should remain civilized.

More generally, current nations/ethnicities must all be turned into
a huge pile of (brown, 2-digit-IQ, etc.) monotypic, monocultural, generic, 'humans'.

Making all differences disappear is what 'diversity' should all be about, isn't it?

And there's no danger that this might allow some sociopathic 'elite' (so to speak)
to easily manipulate and eventually enslave humanity.

No, of course not! :/

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-08-19T18:45:50+00:00

Brilliant! :D

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-08-15T12:03:23+00:00

Oh, joy ... let's still deny stuff that has been demonstrated to be the case over and over ... in order to try and make the world fit primitive tribal nonsense by smelly Middle-Eastern herders!

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-08-06T16:29:53+00:00

No, nice try. In a few cases, as a matter of immediate safety, the freedom of speech may be curtailed by law. 'Yelling fire in a crowded theatre' is a specific (the most commonly known) example of this. What you, on the other hand, are threatening and advocating, violence, assaulting someone (punching them in the throat!) for expressing an opinion, is a serious crime and should land you in jail.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-16T13:31:59+00:00

Both men and women feel sexual attraction.

But sex was invented for reproduction/perpetuation, as it were, and it's supposed to result in pregnancy.

Dating and marriage are designed to take this into account and to ultimately establish propitious conditions for the raising of a child/children, aka, a family.

Everything else, masturbation, abortion, prostitution, etc., represent the mere hedonistic pursuit of empty pleasures ... a dead end, literally.

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-11T18:47:22+00:00

Yes.

They merely follow their professors, and academics like Dr Stephen Jay Gould, who seemed to act according to what was good for popularity, book sales, etc.

Though Gould was a scientist, his views on this were overtly political

Giving 'scientific' support to an upcoming (erroneous or not) ideology is a pretty good career move in any case.

And so, Gould wrote that the bell curve rests on 'four incorrect assumptions', that intelligence must be reducible to a single number, that it must be capable of rank ordering people in a linear order, that it must be primarily genetically based and that it must be essentially immutable.

But, as Haier suggests, to really understand this criticism, one should read the scientific evaluations of it, where it's shown to be invalid, re-establishing the validity of the (much maligned) bell curve data.

Nonetheless, you can find Gould's book, which is demonstrably wrong, in college bookshops ... under assigned(!) reading.

'It's highly popular, highly influential', this, a book that has been taken apart, point by point, by a number of people who actually understood the data.

But neither did Gould seem to care nor did the professors assigning his book.

So, what are the chances that the poor students can form a cogent understanding?

HugodeCrevellier · 2023-05-05T18:11:24+00:00

Very good points, all.

There are two paths ahead for future societies and generations, one dystopic, the other eutopic (as in good, the opposite of dystopic).

Some random-seeming but somewhat relevant thoughts:

Remember that humans live in communities/societies and only by organizing can they hope to improve their future, which is why individualism and being divided (by identity nonsense) is so harmful.

A governmental system of checks and balances seems to be able, at least for a while, to keep things equitable and prevent any one group, i.e. plutocrats, from gaining too much power.

Feudalism could only end, ironically thanks to automation, after inexpensive books and guns became widely available to citizens.

It seems essential to try and avoid the privatized cornering of AI and to ensure universal public access to it.

HugodeCrevellier · 2022-09-22T14:35:56+00:00

Same with Aghia Sophia, in occupied Constantinople.

HugodeCrevellier · 2022-09-09T15:47:22+00:00

Well, it does identify as a canine, i.e. a dog.

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-02-19T09:31:56+00:00

You know you live in an idiocracy when you can get funded for being a moron.

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-01-24T07:51:34+00:00

Libertarian(?), Anarchist(?) ... Liberto-anarchist?

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-01-06T18:27:02+00:00

A problem today is not science of course (that's rather the solution to it), but it is 'scientists' that will disregard observation+reason in order to submit to some ideological (and non-scientific) heterodoxy.

By 'typology', I'm of course referring to its use in anthropology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typology_(anthropology).

Finally, would you agree that typology applies to humans or do you hold that it needs to be denied when humans are concerned?

edit: Hello? :D

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-01-06T17:54:53+00:00

"The misuse of science to promote racism is no longer just a sad relic of our history, it’s also an uncomfortable part of out present.”

It's rather the other way around.

It's science and scientific thinking that gives rise to typology. And it's unscientific careerism that makes many/most current 'scientists' (by ~~name~~ misnomer only) submit to woke dogmata denying the existence of human types. How else can we explain managing not to notice differences between human groups, nor similarities within them ... not being able to determine any types whatsoever when observing e.g. (pre-'diversification') European Swedes, African Pigmies, Australian aborigines, etc?

We seem to currently be going through a climate of oppression in enforcing an orthodoxy that's reminiscent of Galileo's plight ... but by use of more subtle 'soft power'.

'It's difficult for a man to understand something, when his salary depends on not understanding it'.

'E pur si muove'

HugodeCrevellier · 2021-01-01T15:42:22+00:00

US Army Thus Develops Weaker Soldiers With Less Stamina ... And Will Eventually Fully Replace Them By Robots.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-23T13:48:07+00:00

As a general rule, the USA, starting out as a European colony, got most of its ideas from Europe.

However, after the WWII destruction of Europe,
its US and USSR occupiers (and their European stooges)
literally outlawed many of the competing ideas/ideals/ideologies in Europe.

Basically, the same thing that was done to European Art was done to European Ideas.

Ugliness, stupidity and primitivism were now the only allowed/promoted movements
and anything classical/European was to be despised.

To become a celebrated artist or thinker in occupied Europe,
you had to abide by the new rules ...
something that, unfortunately, is still going on.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-21T16:22:44+00:00

The war for decency and against sociopathy is timeless.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-18T10:18:34+00:00

It's weird how rare it is to see/hear the speeches of
such a historically important figure.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-17T18:20:39+00:00

The NYT does not clumsily 'ban' Journalists
(to the extent that any remain at the NYT)
from using accurate words
('Genocide', 'Occupation' and 'Palestine').

As masters of lies and experts at doublespeak,
they merely instead imply that telling the truth
might be detrimental to your continued employment.

You see, they just want their 'journalists' to
~~keep spewing bullshit~~ ... errr ... use alternative terms,
you know, for 'better clarity and accuracy', of course. :/

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-15T19:05:03+00:00

He was arrested for posting political opinions.
Persecuting him over this kind of thing is oppressive and totalitarian.
And, unfortunately, you're right, this is also, shockingly,
the same path that Scotland is choosing.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-15T09:27:08+00:00

The USA has finally gone full South-American pseudo-democracy,
weaponized government institutions, et al.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-15T09:19:18+00:00

No, no, the only way to halt the descent into violence and lawlessness
is to control, corrupt and weaponize government institutions,
certainly the media/information, and to brainwash away democracy,
turning 'we, the people' into 'mobs' of 'deplorables'.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-15T08:16:38+00:00

There are laws about immigration.

These were broken.

So much harm has been done by those (morons/cowards/criminals?)
that (unwittingly?) colluded with Europe-hating forces
to bypass these laws and enable/encourage illegal immigration into Europe,
basically to try to turn Europe into yet another shithole.

Every one of them should be found and indicted.
They should at the very least be fired.
They're either too stupid or too corrupt to be left in charge of anything.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-14T09:46:52+00:00

You're, unfortunately, right.

And censorship is never used to defend the truth,
since the truth never needed censors/inquisitors.

Censorship is always used to protect some bullshit
(ideology/religion, e.g. Islamism)
from the truth.

And it's getting worse.
Sociopathic turds that claim
to 'protect' people from 'dis/misinformation'
control more and more what
you're allowed to see.

Most notably, in Europe,
if you want to reach RT for example
to get a Russian perspective on global affairs,
good luck, because ....

DAS IST VERBOTEN!!!

... for your own good, of course. :/

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-14T08:19:09+00:00

Future generations are going to make fun of us,

of ALL of us,

including those of us who,

by mere inaction,

allowed this grotesque situation to happen.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-09T12:43:03+00:00

When the corruption manages to overcome the senility.

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-09T08:54:01+00:00

Woah, can you say absolute evil?

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-08T19:03:46+00:00

Nonsense

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-07T13:48:39+00:00

Sure, the oil industry must not get subsidized by taxpayers
(and they should furthermore pay for the disposal of plastics not to mention spills),
and leaks do harm sea life and more generally the environment, etc., etc., etc.,
but that's not was was being discussed, now, was it?

And the question was not 'ignore any and every point being made,
avoid understanding anything,
and mindlessly regurgitate some mantra'.

It was rather:

So, his concerns seem arguably valid, IF his numbers are correct.

Are they correct?

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-07T09:09:01+00:00

I'm not the one pretending to challenge his arguments,
nor, certainly, spewing labels and insults,
including, ironically, about what a moron he is.

'The rest of the information' that you linked,
i.e. about gases other than CO2,
methane (CH4), at 0.01%, constitutes even (and much) less than CO2,
and as for Nitrous Oxide and/or CFCs, their percentages are even tinier, as in minuscule,
i.e parts per billion of the atmosphere.
The most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere seems to be ... water vapour.

And the CO2 part of the NASA thing you quote and link says

'carbon dioxide (CO2) is released through natural processes (like volcanic eruptions) and through human activities'.

Fine, so, what Mr Jones claims is that
the anthropogenic (human activities) portion
of the (0.04%) CO2 part of the atmosphere
constitutes merely 3% of that 0.04%,
meaning that natural processes contribute 97% of it,
i.e. of the 0.04% part of the atmosphere that is CO2.

Now, many/most policies currently being proposed
aim at curbing anthropogenic carbon production,
at great costs to societies/taxpayers/people
and great profits to the corporations positioned to 'solve the problem',
all the while ignoring that 97% of CO2 production is not anthropogenic.

So, his concerns seem arguably valid, IF his numbers are correct.

Are they correct?

HugodeCrevellier · 2024-04-05T09:22:19+00:00

The basic challenge of men pretending to be women may be their 'struggle against reality' (Monty Python).

HugodeCrevellier