Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not claiming to understand how it works. I don't even know what it is. And those who are pushing it on anyone, let alone children, most certainly don't. But it does happen in a small number of people; whether that's enough to consider them a different gender is up for debate.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]dwo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not true. My viewpoints are that if someone makes a claim - you - there's an innate gender something - you need to prove it. If you don't really believe it, then why is it being argued is real? Why is it being pushed as real on children? Why is it being pushed to change law? Amputees once HAD their lost body part. You don't have an internal map for a body you never had. Do you believe you can be transracial?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think that's correct. This study is suss.

Reddit's progressives popping up in r/legaladvice to offer their opinions on a race-based matter. by LordoftheFlies in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]RaverJodes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Splitting up meetings like that is so wong though

Democrats are banning religion for anyone under 19, and redditors are celebrating by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]RaverJodes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck religion

Are there even dickless women on reddit? by [deleted] in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Only women who go out with men 30 years older than them and lock them in the house or women whose mother in law turned up to their wedding in a wedding dress.

Reddit's progressives popping up in r/legaladvice to offer their opinions on a race-based matter. by LordoftheFlies in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]LordoftheFlies[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hahaha, yeah, I saw that one and that's the one that had me suddenly taking a much closer look at the rest of the comments.

Reddit's progressives popping up in r/legaladvice to offer their opinions on a race-based matter. by LordoftheFlies in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]LordoftheFlies[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've heard that the best advice that that sub can give you is "get/you need a lawyer, right fucking now."

Though, occasionally, there's some helpful what kind of lawyer you might need as well. And the tree law shit is always good for entertainment. You mention a cut down tree in that sub, you'll have motherfuckers lined up 20 deep and 20 across to cite actually useful information at you :D.

Reddit's progressives popping up in r/legaladvice to offer their opinions on a race-based matter. by LordoftheFlies in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Id suggest that the group reads the book White Supremacy and Me by Layla Saad togethe

How 'bout NO.

Reddit's progressives popping up in r/legaladvice to offer their opinions on a race-based matter. by LordoftheFlies in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That sub is awful even by Reddit standards. Every username I ever used there got banned quickly, often for trying to correct misinformation or bad advice.

Teacher has to actually teach rather than put on a movie by jet199 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what gets removed

HornySlut9000-32 points1 day, 3 hours ago [removed] by mod

Jews are white though. It wasn't a race thing. White people are killed, black people were killed, i don't know about Asians. But yeah, Jews are white so it definitely wasn't a race thing. Jews are white people that follow Judaism

the follow up comment appears to mask what the comment said in this next one

check the point count, 7981

Hour-Concentrate-7981 point17 hours, 21 minutes ago [removed] by mod

Jews call non Jews “cattle”

iindsay2nd grade | ESOL | Maryland0 points1 day, 1 hour ago

Wrong. Jews are people who follow Judaism or were born into it.

i'd say the rule as we know it has finally ended.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. I sure do! Gosh you pwned me there with that one!

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you're proposing the existence of big dinosaur skin biasing palaeontology research, you need to go back on the meds.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Go on.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mate, you've claimed every paper has outside influence biasing it.

You're comments are a joke long before I responded to them.

Teacher has to actually teach rather than put on a movie by jet199 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a society we would do a lot better to modernize education and remove as much teacher influence as possible. As long as the curriculum was not designed by jews. That would be a dystopic end to society.

5 min video followed by a quiz, then another 5 min video then quiz. Then use the results of the quiz to serve up the right next video based on the studen's understanding. Allow for video speed adjustment so the student's arent overwhelmed or bored.

That would be so powerful. The only reason it isn't done is because the high IQ student's would blast past the low IQ students. Progressives would rather hold everyone back rather than allow inequality to grow.

According to progressives it is better that we all drown toegther rather than only the strong swimmers get to shore.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No. I'm not. You've turned it into a joke I'm afraid. Sorry!

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you not even following the conversation?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"""Dinosaur skin™..."""

Just stop.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you have no basis for claiming that the is one?

... But you suspect that the big dinosaur skin is biassing the results by influencing the research by threatening funding unless the interpretation of the fossil meets their nefarious purposes?

Teacher has to actually teach rather than put on a movie by jet199 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]chottohen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the teacher does it right, she can take up at least three classes with the video and a bit of discussion each day. For overtime she could assign a paper on the movie and have students read them in class. All this could take up to five days of class. That's a lot of time for the teacher to chill out. Hey teacher, don't try to stamp our their "no holocaust" opinions—try to encourage them to think and express themselves.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I can't answer that question as with most papers they do not disclose conflicts of interest.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I already stated my observations. Not that it matters, because we are way off topic now. Of course, that is where you took us.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, deflect but not deny.

Deny What? So far your question is "So now ESG funds are dark money?". The answer is "If and only if it's from people or organizations whose names are not known or revealed."

Your inability to comprehend simple English is dragging this out. You're trying to avoid something? Were you beaten with a scholarly paper as a child?

So how was that paper funded?

The dinosaur one?

The question you're avoiding answering is "What is the outside influence on this paper?"

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Papers are typically written upon a base premise. You already know the conclusion, and you are trying to prove it.

Oh FFS.

And for the paper on the dinosaur skin? What is the conclusion they were "trying" to prove?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you mate. What is this news?

Papers are typically written upon a base premise. You already know the conclusion, and you are trying to prove it.

The entire paper is written after the research.

Correct. After.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The entire paper is written after the research.

You don't write "The most commonly preserved soft tissues associated with ornithischian dinosaurs are skin remains. The apparent resistance of hadrosaur skin to decay, and its abundance in the fossil record relative to that of other tetrapods, has been attributed to factors such as thickness and composition. Here we report additional intrinsic factors within hadrosaur skin: 3D-preserved eumelanin-bearing bodies, dermal cells and blood vessel fragments in an organic matrix composed of protein fossilization products. The skin is much thinner than that of living mammals of similar size. It is likely that the preservation of hadrosaur skin is related to the arrangement of the layers composing it."

And then go and look for the additional intrinsic factors described.

Boy, have I got some bad news for you.

Do you mate. What is this news?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You really think the abstract is crafted after the Main body of the paper? Boy, have I got some bad news for you.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A paper is not "pure research".

Yes it is.

A paper attempts to prove it's abstract and premise

No, the abstract summarises the findings of the research.

The premise is not part of a paper. That's just something you made up.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, deflect but not deny. Of course! And then end with another obligatory insult. Have you caught on yet, that this tactic is not working?

So how was that paper funded? Is it your paper, is it your graduation thesis? As to me it looks to brush anomalies under the rug to maintain the status quo. I'm certain someone appreciates this, regardless as to it's accuracy. And that's a clearly biased motivation.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What dark money you think is behind pure research when that research is away from a topic that you have motivated distrust of the facts

You may not understand what you are saying. A paper is not "pure research". In fact, it's not research at all. A paper attempts to prove it's abstract and premise, as motivated by it's authors, the authors professor, and or funders involved. The only "research" involved is almost always clerical.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

FFS.

Dark money is money from people or organizations whose names are not known or revealed.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dark-money

ESG funds are only dark money if the particular fund is not known or revealed.

If you have any further problems with the English language feel free to google it your fucking self.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not a denial. So ESG funds are dark money?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're not declared in the paper, are they?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If they work to the extent of stopping someone damaging their limb, then those would be preferable. (Assuming the side effects are better than having a prosthetic.)

Edit: I quick look on the internet suggests that there are treatments to help reduce the distress and depression associated with the condition, but there isn't anything that fully removes the desired to get rid of the limb.

So you still need to determine if the patient is going to try to amputate themselves unsafely. If so they're better off if an expert does it in safe conditions.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Haloperidol and Pimozide were (and sometimes still are) treatments for BID. Wokeness shouted down the good science on those drugs, though.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So now ESG funds are dark money?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which would you prefer to hear?

What dark money you think is behind pure research when that research is away from a topic that you have motivated distrust of the facts.

... Or did I overestimate your grasp of reality. Are you against palaeontology too, because young earth creation or something?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which would you prefer to hear? That it doesn't disclose it's funding, or that everything in all recorded history and the world at large influenced it?

As for it's Abstract and it's Results? I just see a lot of excuses being made for unexplained abnormalities.

Please do tell me what the point of this little exercise was.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reddit mad at his brother by Tarrock in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Fecici_Nutclap 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This isn't reddit and we are not soytards, let's not pretend this exchange is real

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please provide a single paper and not a search result.

In addition, remove your location data from your above link.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everything in existence has outside influence, and it is up to the observer to determine bias and effect.

What is the outside influence on this paper?

https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=dinosaur+skin&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1675283442911&u=%23p%3DD0zsB56LmZIJ

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that there's no treatment for BID.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is the longest-winded way to say "yes, I think we should cut off someone's healthy body parts" I've seen yet.

Why wouldn't we just treat the underlying mental illness instead of mutilating people?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just any that you're interested in why I didn't answer.

Jesus Christ man. The next three sentences actually touches base on that. Did you not manage to get to the second sentence? How does context work? What is a paragraph and how do they work?

I was discussing your over reaction to the topic. Not the topic itself.

I was emphasizing how you singled out that one point and harped on it to the point of accusations of lying. How that you made ESG a major point of contention, and yet have no opinion on it. For some reason, emphasizing it's lack of inclusion. Which seems paradoxical and strange to me.

This doesn't relate to the Netherlands paper does it? There wasn't any money involved in that.

You don't dictate my comments, or what the point of them is. Simply saying it doesn't have to do with what you said is garbage. In addition, simply saying there was no outside influence or funding, is a childish assumption. Everything in existence has outside influence, and it is up to the observer to determine bias and effect.

It's not climate change denial or religious rights to be prejudiced against science, gays and education.

I'm going to need for you to give that another try. As I am uncertain of what you were trying to say there, or how it is related to the rest of the reply.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I see that all your viewpoints are now revolving around bowing down to material reality. It sounds to me like you're dependent on the system and impulsively fighting to protect it. When it comes to that point I tend to think the person is just making excuses to justify the world's atrocities. It's ironic how you try to present submitting to material reality as "self acceptance", when that's literally giving yourself up.

I don't really believe I have a gender really, or that anyone does. That's also part of this material reality crap. There's just something wrong with this particular brain. You do have an internal body map and this is why amputees feel like they still have lost members. I'm guessing that's where the problem is, along with some sense of how to perceive the world and use my brain. But I'm not a doctor or a brain scientist. Beyond that I'm skeptical of any male/female differences that aren't hormonal or cultural.

Democrats are banning religion for anyone under 19, and redditors are celebrating by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or satanism

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any differences detected are the result of hormones and do not exist in children. That doesn't mean there aren't any, but we have no evidence.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Skull size affects brain size. This is all stupid, every single supposed difference turns out to be caused indirectly by a different trait.

Even if there are trends, which we can never seem to identify, there's still no evidence for a distinctly male or female brain.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you wish for me to Quote every Question you ignored is this thread? I can but it would be silly.

Just any that you're interested in why I didn't answer.

Now back to what I was originally saying. Money gets results.

This doesn't relate to the Netherlands paper does it? There wasn't any money involved in that. It's not climate change denial or religious rights to be prejudiced against science, gays and education.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you wish for me to Quote every Question you ignored is this thread? I can but it would be silly. And not the point at all. To be clear, I was discussing your over reaction to the topic. Not the topic itself.

Now back to what I was originally saying. Money gets results. Even if that money is based on lies. You can turn a tidy profit by pushing any agenda no matter if it is the truth or it is not.

https://www.investopedia.com/news/gender-equality-potential-driver-esg-funds/

ESG subverts nations.

Environmental Social Governance. Not a single one of those things are the business of banks. And they have no right to be Governing, performing social engineering, nor dictating environmental science based on their banking practices.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you simply asked for proof of ESG funds with no motivation?

You made the claim that the study was funded by such a fund. I wondered if it was true. tbh I thought if you answered I'd be able to work out what an ESG fund is.

You claim this is not an issue, while clearly this is important to you somehow.

I don't believe that there was any external funding. When people say things that I suspect are wrong, I tend to call them out on it.

You ignored so many Questions

Such as?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you simply asked for proof of ESG funds with no motivation? What a strange behavior. And what an even more bizarre hill to defend. You claim this is not an issue, while clearly this is important to you somehow. You ignored so many Questions, and yet this not only requires accusations of lies, but multiple unprompted retorts. Why?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You pushed back against ESG,

No i didn't.

I asked what group you think funded the Netherlands study. I couldn't see any, but o wondered if you were lying or knew something i didn't.

Looks like the former.

and are now claiming that you do not view them as bad.

I didn't claim that either.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're lying about that too.

Yes. I was considering changing the wording as that Question, but chose not to as your anticipated reply doesn't make any sense. You pushed back against ESG, and are now claiming that you do not view them as bad. Do you see the paradox here? Why argue against their inclusion if they are not bad?

Originally I had more to say here, but I apparently failed to save my first reply and have forgotten key elements of what I had earlier typed.

because they're the beliefs of your in-group and you don't have the personal strength to switch to what's true.

I had much to say about this as well (on this second attempt of a reply). But then I remembered, I don't share personal information online, and thus am incapable of fending off this personal attack upon my character. Nor should I have to for that matter. *deleted*

On that note. I did not expect such a personal attack from you.

I S̤̺̞uppose __'__ __ ___ _______ ___. And that's just fine with me.

­͉̟͕͓̣̞̗̣̯̩͕̻͚̣͊̽ͮ̿ͨ̌ͧͣ̓̈̊̅ͯ̈́

Ĥ̅͛ǝ̮̺͕̲̰llo ʍoɹlp' I,m Qnǝsʇᴉouɐqlǝ.̬̘̟ͅ

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]dwo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If there's no autism, then non-verbal people who bang their heads on the wall and can't handle loud noises are traumatized individuals. Sometimes the trauma comes in ways society considers obviously worth of doing that kind of damage, but sometimes it comes in ways society doesn't like to consider, like unavailable parents. If language is formed in early years, and a mom struggling with a lack of ability to bond with her child is raising a child without extended family and isn't really speaking to her child and making eye contact with it during the day while dad is gone, how do you think the child, who is supposed to learn by mimicking, will do that? How is the child supposed to engage without being taught engagement? How is a child supposed to learn attachment when being rejected? Men are given no responsibility in nurturing the child, so when dad comes home and plays video games with the kid on his lap instead of making eye contact, why would the child want to participate in the real, material world? I'd be in my head in a fantasy (disassociation - known sign of trauma) or banging my head (known sign of self-stimulation), too.

So, your explanation of gender is no one can feel it if you aren't transgender? I don't believe in feelings that only some people claim to have. There's no way to verify them. You need to be able to prove something you claim exists that has no evidence. And telling me you feel something is real isn't evidence. Plenty of people will tell me they feel the spirit of God. I don't believe in that either.

And, certainly, there's no reason to change law or consider men who feel their hands are too big to be male hands, anything but men who are having a delusion. Which you are, because you aren't supposed to have any other body than the DNA your parents gave you. Your hands aren't supposed to be something else when you look there. I'm sorry you aren't what you want. No one is. Which is why the traditional help for delusions is to come back to material reality and self-acceptance. I hope you get there someday. Also, it's super vain to be so focused on what's on the outside for your worth, and men have value.

Democrats are banning religion for anyone under 19, and redditors are celebrating by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Bonn1770 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Banning Christianity. I bet thtey won't touch the Jews or Islam.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]DONKEYBALOGNA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These trainees need to be stopped they want to be able to give these medications to children they're in their teaching first graders about gender identity man f*** these mother f****** they better be glad they didn't teach my children about that s***

Democrats are banning religion for anyone under 19, and redditors are celebrating by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oof. Those commenters are just the worst sort of people, and absolute stereotypes of Reddit.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]DONKEYBALOGNA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let me ask you a question what's the difference between testicular cancer and breast cancer because I don't have any breasts but I do have testicles and sometimes I find myself sitting here and I'm thinking my testicles are really dirty greasy and I'm like do I need to get checked for cancer what do you think cuz like I don't have any breasts because I'm a male I think are the testicles a clue that I'm male let me ask you a question give it to me straight don't mess around give me the straight answer

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As far as I can tell there's no external money. A bunch of academics on salary got access to look at a stack of medical records. There's no obvious cost that needs to be covered.

I believe you're made that up because you need to bring into question the findings, and there's biased enough with their data or methods, to bring the facts around to your beliefs that you are clinging to, because they're the beliefs of your in-group and you don't have the personal strength to switch to what's true.

You acknowledge ESG funds as bad.

You're lying about that too.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Deep man.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And I already explained to you how size is only an indirect correlation. It's caused by other factors that are affected by sex, such as height.

You're mistaken about that. The skull in males, even at birth, is independently larger, even correcting for factors such as height.

There are cultural differences too. But if transexualism can be cultural, which I question, it certainly isn't always. Their brains can be physically more similar to the other gender from the one assigned at birth.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not the entire body of research.

There was a meta analysis last year combining 53 studies in the field.


It depends on the severity of the body integrity disorder. In the case of people who are very distressed by their legs will try to damage them beyond repair outside a hospital setting. That is a worse outcome than a surgical amputation.

And my understanding is that the outcomes for such people is improved psychological health and happiness, which is more important that not having to put on your prostheses in the morning.

Until we have a cure for body integrity disorder, I think that it makes sense to allow people suffering severely to have a elective amputation. But again you need to be confident of your diagnosis. If it isn't going to relieve the distress, its going to be a mistake.

Note that there's no similarity between that and HRT. Not every transsexual decides to get bottom surgery, because, I assume, the impact on sexual function.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And I already explained to you how size is only an indirect correlation. It's caused by other factors that are affected by sex, such as height.

You'll notice that kids are much less stereotypical. Even since infancy they've picked up on gender norms, but it takes long enough that you can see it progress. Kids will play with either gender, but when they get older they'll only hang out with their own gender. Kids begrudgingly follow gender roles because their parents want them to; but by the time they're teenagers it's part of their identity. Kids treat each other the same; grown ups have a whole bunch of double standards based around gender. You can literally see the brainwashing progress over time.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mediated by hormones perhaps. But you can't know that none of it is due to the genetic differences of the sex chromosomes themselves.

It's not height that makes the difference. Skull size is independently different. And even if you ignore head-size-related measurements, you can still identify from the brain alone the sex in 92% of cases.

Even if you take out brain size entirely, and correct for the effects of that on every other measurement you can still tell sex from the brain better than a coin toss. (Technically about 70% of the time, as at what we knew back in 2016).

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's physical differences in the brain from birth. Easiest to measure is size.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If there's no autism then explain non-verbal people who bang their head on the wall and can't handle loud noises. You're probably thinking of self-diagnosed snowflakes on Twitter.

Men and women don't necessarily have different personalities and interests, but their bodies are still designed to excel at different things. For example women can see color a lot more vividly than men. Men won't exactly be born wanting to see a dry and washed out world all the time, but that's what they get. Women can easily be into sports, but their bodies aren't fit for many of them. It might sound unethical that nature would let someone's desires be different from their abilities, and that's because it is.

These differences in biology are not aligned with how people think men and women are different though. There's nothing that would hinder either gender from liking blue or pink.

That alone can't explain gender dysphoria though. That's just normal personality variance, and those people still feel right in their bodies and don't want to change, even if they have their annoyances. But there does seem to be something that makes the person expect a certain set of traits, and if it doesn't match you'll feel like shit. I don't know what that is. Some sense of normalcy seems to be hardwired. A man might prefer seeing more vivid colors, but if he perceives dullness as normal it won't bother him much, and he probably won't even realize it. But I know that's not how the world is supposed to look. I do happen to care, but even if I didn't, it would still feel off. And I can have atypical preferences but I can never change what my body is capable of, therefore I cannot make anything feel right. Of course if you've always felt right you'll never understand the difference. It's literally impossible to explain to you, because you have no reference. Nor do we have the language to describe it because it's such a rare disease. What I've said is a very poor explanation at best, and I'm afraid that's about as close as it gets. I simply don't have the tools to get it across to you. This is why normal people will always be confused and transtrenders think transitioning because of stereotypes is perfectly valid. Because to all of you, it's the same thing.

It could very well be that some people simply get insanely unlucky and end up wanting all the traits of the opposite sex. What makes me doubt that is how even things I never think or care about are off to me. For example my hands look too big to me and my fingers look distorted. It doesn't bother me, but it isn't what I expected to see either. I had no idea until recently that this is a sexually dimorphic trait and that the female version matches what I expect to see. This stuff happens A LOT. And some of it seems minor, and a lot of it is, but much of it does cause me discomfort. It's more irritating than acutely painful, but there is a lot of it, and keep in mind I have to deal with it all 24/7. Conversely, I've never had any desire to be seen or treated as a different gender (unless it's simply better, for example girls are allowed to struggle with life). Any gender "identity" I ever had came from the way I was raised. I don't see how wearing dresses or being "validated" is supposed to help me any. It's not going to make me stop feeling like my male bone growth is a heavy set of armor fused under my skin. I just don't like the way my body feels and functions.

What is strange and really freaky is I do happen to get deja vu seeing the female routine. It's not that I'm interested in it so much as I feel like I've lived it before and now my memory has been reset or altered. I have my suspicions, but that's getting into a different topic that I don't think is particularly relevant here.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By a tiny bit. But we give false hope by advertising it as a magic pill.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, post-puberty. Even then they don't know many real patterns. They just say "women are more emotional, so having larger emotional centers is a feminine trait".

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And they're all either the result of hormones, socialization, or are only indirectly correlated with sex. For example, female brains are 10% smaller on average. But it turns out that's actually because they're shorter on average. There are hormonal differences but those don't appear until puberty, and they still affect trans people.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All words in the world are defined by other words. When you change the definition of any single word, it has a knock on effect that subtly changes the definition of all words in existence. The less change that takes place over time, the easier it is to pass a lie as a truth. Which is why the lies are so transparent now during this time in history.

As any child will tell you, the easiest way to lie is to hide it in a partial truth. Legal definitions become abstraction layers used to conceal crimes, and cognitive dissonance turns to angst. You don't know what's wrong, but you know something is. You have been deceived.

Regarding Black Sunshine. If I told you at this time, you would lash out at me in disbelief.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll be asking the Questions here! Thank you!

So you are telling me who's funds were used? And guaranteeing it wasn't a shell company or false front? How much was based on assumptions and assumed common sense? How does a study in Finland relate to all other societies with their own unique structures in the world? Does the base logic even translate across languages? Do you understand the level of corruption in finances, as all fiat is based on debt, ensuring that the holder of the currency is literally paying for their own enslavement, turning the world into a Skinner box of sorts? Does it make sense for a billion years of evolution to suddenly go wrong because we invented basic tools such as the wrist watch and the power loom, causing the need to cut off our own genitals to become well? Why can't there be effeminate men without the need to chop off their reproductive organs? You acknowledge ESG funds as bad. Why?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]dwo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is gender?

It is not being male or female. That is sex. Sex is being male or female.

What is gender? I'm failing to see an answer to an honest question. You like to redirect when you have no actual answer but feel you know you're correct?

Gender is sex stereotypes. The idea that women are nurturing and men are aggressive is taught and learned. Unless the brain scans of male and female newborns are scanned, show differences, and those differences stay on those scans through adulthood, we can say the differences are learned because of neuroplasticity. We know it's nurture. We know that. We have zero evidence of anything described as "gender."

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]dwo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So, this statement is likely to feel inflammatory but is honest - I agree there's as little evidence for autism as there is for gender.

I understand you feel/believe you have something wrong with your brain because you hate the sexed characteristics of your body. That's what you mean, right? That you hate the physical reminder that you are male or female? But being male or female only means we produce sperm or eggs. That's it. You don't have to be anything else - not submissive, not degraded in porn and other media representations, not your appearance being the thing of most value of you, not into pink, "overly emotional," etc., has nothing to do with being female.

What do you mean by "to function as best they can as their sex" or "preferences that the opposite sex is biologically more suited for." So, men aren't allowed to be nurses? Women aren't allowed to be fire fighters? Those are the social stereotypes - the definition of gender. If you agree that the differences in personality are clearly the result of the socialization, can you explain better what you mean by the two quotes in this paragraph? Thank you.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If it means so much to you to be called a liar, do it yourself.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Detransitioners are about 1%

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People are born with mixed genders. Sometimes the mismatch is between the body and brain's gender.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's the same as with the "gay gene." They' can't accept that all of this is Nurture and not Nature,

It's about half each.

Separated twin studies show that if you've got a gay identical twin you're about 50% likely to be gay.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]dwo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure. I didn't suspect that you were lying.

Yes, you did. You questioned my integrity when you said:

It would not have been walk-in-walk-out. They would have been in there one or two hours. And they would not have been a child.

in response to my saying:

The child of a friend walked right into Planned Parenthood with no such diagnosis and walked right out with hormones after one meeting.

By taking exactly what I said and adding your own interpretation. You added the claim the child must have been underage. You claimed I said they walked in and walked out, when you can clearly see I wrote "after one meeting." You're being disingenuous, and you inferred I was misinterpreting what I claimed "for the reader." You are disingenuous and misread/intentionally misinterpret so that the "reader" would think me a liar. That's not acceptable.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Note that she specifically says regrowth

I took that to mean no growth after stopping hrt.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Compared to hrt they're reversible.

Compared to the exorcist, they're more of a drug and less of a horror show.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. It's from medical records, not surveys.

What did you read?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gender is being male or female. In the case of those that don't fit in either of those boxes, it's whatever they are.

Male gender is the gender that people who are male have. Female gender is the gender that people who are female have.

I'm failing to see what you're trying to get at with this line of questioning.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By using the affirmation model, as you've been shoving down everyone's throats up there.

Have i?

What's the affirmation model?

Someone says they are trans, and that means they are trans. Boom, done. What a rigorous process for a diagnosis.

Trans doesn't need a diagnosis, because it doesn't need treatment. Gender dysphoria needs treatment, and the diagnostic criteria are above.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And when you say "flu". You have no idea what you are actually saying as the word has lost it's original meaning.

When i say it i mean influenza. And it's fairly well defined.

What was the original meaning?

Do you honestly wish for me to believe you do not see this transparent ruses?

I don't think I've given any thought to what i would like you to believe about that. But i have no idea what these "ruses" are.

Black sunshine's a car isn't it?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What "ESG" funds were used for the Dutch study?

How much?

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm saying people transition, and it improves their psychological disorders, and their quality of life, and their suicidal ideation.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How ineffective is surprising to you?

Would a halving of mortality be surprisingly ineffective for breast cancer?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK72103/

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All the differences are clearly the result of socialization or hormones

Those contribute.

I don't think it's known how much genetics and how much hormones contribute to the differences in the brains of males and females.

Your claim that "No one is born with them" would be a 0% contribution by genetics, which is implausible.

Of course you can say people are born with "masculine" and "feminine" brains, but that's circular logic

No. Some of the differences are in the sizes of different structures, and can be measured objectively post-mortem.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Look mate, there's a whole body of work about the sexual dimorphism of the human brain.

If you're not familiar with what we know about the field, wiki is a pretty good primer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_sex_differences

But calling it "just sexism" doesn't make it so.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You seem to be arguing that life and existence hold no meaning, and are inherently without merit. If you believe this to be a self evident truth, then we have nothing to say to each other at this time.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How so? You obviously know your own kids, you'll probably meet your grandkids and great grandkids, but that's it. What happens after that is of no relevance to you, and you can't predict or control what your descendents will do. What about people who don't have kids at all? Do they not have lives?

I actually think it's not such a bright idea to drag another innocent life into this world. I don't believe in any form of coercion so extinguishing existing life is out of the question, including the unborn. But creating new flesh in the first place isn't as ethical as it seems. I don't expect you to understand any of this though. I've reached a point where I know more about the world than the human mind was meant to handle. And it's not a place you want to be.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your heritage and your way of life depends on you continuing your family line. How your children help craft humanity is vital to our existence. That is all.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have issues with my biology but that's it. For the longest time I didn't even realize it was connected to sex until I noticed they're all sexually dimorphic characteristics.

I don't really know how to explain it though other than it just doesn't mesh with me. It's like not getting along with a person. The worst of it is actually in my cognitive functioning. It feels like my brain is a bunched of incompatible parts duct-taped together. But I also have a lot of other problems up there so I'm not sure how much of it is actually related to this.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you do Neo

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay I agree with everything you said, but I don't see what the big deal is about the family blood line. It comes up a lot so I'm curious.

Breast Mourning by Musky in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are differences in desires and motivation, personality, aggression and sexuality in the brains of women compared to men.

That's literally just sexism and doesn't have anything to do with the body even if it were true.