GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]grixitperson 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]BiologyIsReal 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]comradeconradical 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]emptiedriver 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]verypeaktransNot GC but overlaps with GC 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]comradeconradical[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]comradeconradical[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]comradeconradical[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]comradeconradical[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]comradeconradical[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]pollyesther 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]comradeconradical[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: How do we determine who is identifying as trans in bad faith under self-identification? by comradeconradical in GCdebatesQT
[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]emptiedriver 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]ZveroboyAlina 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]ZveroboyAlina 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]ZveroboyAlina 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]ZveroboyAlina 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]loveSloaneGCAF[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]loveSloaneGCAF[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]loveSloaneGCAF[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]loveSloaneGCAF[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]yousaythosethings 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MezozoicGaygay male 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: What are your thoughts on this pro-trans person's arguments? Can you tell me why their arguments are unsound and why you disagree with them? by MissDimples in GCdebatesQT
[–]divingrightintowork 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]divingrightintowork 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]divingrightintowork 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]yousaythosethings 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]reluctant_commenter 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]ColoredTwiceIntersex female, medical malpractice victim 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]loveSloaneGCAF[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]Genderbender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
QT: A question of ideology by loveSloaneGCAF in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]emptiedriver 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
Both: Do "transbians" exist outside the West? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
Both: Do "transbians" exist outside the West? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
Both: Do "transbians" exist outside the West? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]SnowAssMan 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]kwallio 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]SnowAssMan 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]2oldforschool[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
GC: I have questions that need answers by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun - (0 children)
GC: If only two "men", only two "women" or someone on their own can create an embryo/baby, then there is no difference between "man" and "woman", "egg" and "sperm", and they are man-made socially constructed categories that don't actually exist. If you disagree, please explain your reasons by 2oldforschool in GCdebatesQT
[–]MarkTwainiac 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)