That wasn't the most entertaining read, and there were even a couple points where I didn't think he made his case as clearly as he could have, but holy shit, comparing it the opposing article is hilarious.

Richard Dawkins starts by explaining why male and female are concrete biological categories, why gender, at least in the modern woke sense is meaningless, and finally answers the assignment (what is a woman?) with "A woman is an adult human female, free of Y chromosomes."

Jacqueline Rose rambles about oppression, feminism, identity, muggers, universal infantile bisexuality and all sorts of buzzwords before ultimately concluding that it would be politically incorrect to answer the question.

I almost feel bad for her. Obviously she's no mental match for Dawkins, and she had the unenviable task of defending pure nonsense to boot.