Bottled water distributions begin as lead water poisoning crisis erupts in Newark, New Jersey

x0x7 · 2019-08-17T11:27:00+00:00

You realize that it was a government that installed the shitty pipes and private companies providing an alternate means of getting water right?

Besides, they had regulations. They didn't work.

Capitalism has conscience because people have conscience, and more specifically the purchasers do, and can make their own choices. When government is involved choices are reduced, and good ideas can't compete as effectively against government's subsidized stupidity.

x0x7 · 2019-08-14T03:39:44+00:00

This is why I'm hopeful for the debates. Trump is either completely inarticulate or very articulate. It depends on the day. I'm hoping he's compiled a list of every lie they've told about him and can knock them down and show how they are lies.

We have smirkgate. Years of "russian collusion" to which their isn't even the smallest hint of evidence for. Them saying that pizzagate was fake news by misrepresenting a quote from the DC police chief saying "we didn't find anything" when he actually said "we didn't find anything because we didn't look." Which is ironic because it itself is fakenews. We have journos calling everything they dislike fake news, like specifically pizza gate, because it didn't have "definitive proof" therefore fake news, but then the russian collusion has zero and it isn't fake news?

I'm saddend by the fact that half the country doesn't get any news outside of this cabal because if they got any it would be so easy to demonstrate how unethical and dishonest these people are. It's so blindingly obvious that the only way you couldn't be complaining is if either you are willfully ok with being lied to or if the only thing you hear are lies so you don't know anything but them.

And the media then attacks Trump for calling them the enemy of the people. Well at this point what are they?

I don't even really like Trump. But the way they attack him is what counts and it's completely unethical. Like why not argue against his policies instead of calling his inaugural speech "dark" when it clearly wasn't, accusing him of the non-crime of "colluding with the russians" whilst having no evidence, and calling him a racist with ... no evidence. Like they have honest avenues of attack and they can't be bothered because it is their character to lie.

x0x7 · 2019-08-14T03:25:35+00:00

It sucks that ubuntu ended support for ubuntu-phone. That's what we really need in the mobile sphere. Complete and absolute control with too much hastle like we have for desktop and laptop.

Even if you use the corporate-ware on those devices control is still mostly yours. Mobile is just too locked down.

x0x7 · 2019-08-14T03:21:55+00:00

There are three people I trust.

Me, myself, and I.

x0x7 · 2019-08-13T11:18:21+00:00

Meh. I'm sure the father is so indebted for the quality of math teaching that his son has inherited the debt and continues to risk his career to pay back a guy that is dead anyway.

Critical thinking is not just making a nest of connections and saying, yeah, so there's that.

https://tube.poal.co/watch?v=xGn55BRyDSk

x0x7 · 2019-08-10T14:40:40+00:00

It's even for little things. I know a girl who's a waitress. A cop took a teenager to a bar and told him to order a beer when things were really busy. Next thing she knows she has a court date.

What was it Ayn Rand said, that they don't want a nation without crime. They want a nation of criminals. An innocent man has nothing to fear and therefore can't be ruled. But a criminal can be manipulated and controlled to have his punishments reduced (in this case used to incriminate another person).

That was a paraphrase. This is what she said (or had a character say): https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/319903-did-you-really-think-we-want-those-laws-observed-said

x0x7 · 2019-08-10T14:10:02+00:00

Didn't he know the Clintons. Knowing the Clintons is really depressing.

x0x7 · 2019-08-09T11:47:01+00:00

I prefer it's initial definition given by Mussolini. It's a form of Socialism by Mises's definition of Socialism.

Granted that the 19th century was the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the 20th century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right', a Fascist century. If the 19th century were the century of the individual (liberalism implies individualism) we are free to believe that this is the 'collective' century, and therefore the century of the State.

The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State—a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values—interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people.

...everything in the state, nothing against the State, nothing outside the state.

Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his immanent relationship with a superior law and with an objective Will that transcends the particular individual and raises him to conscious membership of a spiritual society. Whoever has seen in the religious politics of the Fascist regime nothing but mere opportunism has not understood that Fascism besides being a system of government is also, and above all, a system of thought.

If you are for limited government in any way shape or form you are not a fascist.

x0x7 · 2019-08-09T01:45:54+00:00

I feel like insane liberals and the people who want to support fascism both apply an overly broad definition of fascism.

You realize that fascism is a fairly modern invented concept. Everything that came before it that was universal is not exclusively fascist. Gender roles are not fascist even though fascists are one of 1:10,000 groups that recognize the obviousness of gender roles.

x0x7 · 2019-08-09T01:41:11+00:00

If only patents worked like trademarks in this case. I wish only Facebook could use it.

x0x7 · 2019-08-07T12:36:50+00:00

A kid smirking is news.

x0x7 · 2019-08-06T19:37:54+00:00

Well Julian is screwed either way. I would almost prefer to be getting depositions out of him right now just so he has a voice. Government truly is evil. Imagine being in Julian's shoes right now. You've done nothing wrong toward your fellow man and yet your life is thrown away and there is nothing to loose. Governments treat human life as disposable if it is inconvenient to their hopes to retain power. What it means to dispose of human life or to have your life disposed of is something I don't think most of us can fully comprehend.

Therefore the evil of government goes beyond most people's power for comprehension even if they have all the information.

x0x7 · 2019-08-06T18:43:38+00:00

What I dislike about these proposed mental hygiene laws in the context of introducing due process is that it's not due process. It would just be pushing a non-due process procedure into the same systems that do due-process currently.

In order for the government to restrict any right, even those not constitutionally protected, it needs to show that you've committed a crime. That is the 6th Amendment. I don't care if the government decided I can't own a pencil or a computer, they couldn't do that without citing a law I've broken and then went through the hassle of proving it and or intimidating me enough with potential punishments that would violate the 8th amendment to get me to incriminate yourself such that I had.

Doing something unconstitutional and strapping the phase due process to it because there is some process does not make it constitutional or right.

Don't like that you can't legally take gun ownership rights away from the mentally ill.. make an amendment.

I don't care if the constitution required you to perform human sacrifice any time you pass new legislation. If you don't want to do that you have to amend the constitution, the human costs irrespective.

There are cost benefit analyses for human costs applicable to all government policies, both for and against. If that were an argument in regards to constitutionality you could do anything.

x0x7 · 2019-08-06T13:11:44+00:00

You would know exactly who to ask for answers.

I'd like to train the people to realize that person is themselves. Natural Inalienable Rights is absolutely a thing. The idea is that law exists outside of myself. My job isn't to create law but to match law as close as I can. I'd rather do nothing than interfere with the demands of law. One demand of law is this delineation of rights to each person. An individual can't steel from you without trampling that. The government also can't trample that. If a government steps even slightly into a gray area then it should only do so for existential purposes and the protection of other people's rights. Because almost all government action does do that those are the only things government can pursue.

Not only that but if 70% of people want to hang me they can. That's in the agreement. The other aspect is democratic boarders. I'm not entirely a democratic person. Why should we constantly have a political contest for retaining our freedoms when we know what answer we would like. But people should have a right to choose what system of government they affiliate with. And so if a community on a boarder (or in general) decides they want to leave or decide they want to secede and form a new government, or an individual who's land is directly on the boarder decides he prefers the neighbors form of government then a system would exist to handle those changes. If you live on the US/Canada boarder and decide you want to be in Canada, that should be possible. Now a community changing forms of government would require a 2/3 vote because I believe there is partially a natural right to consistent government if you prefer it but there is a competing natural right for people to affiliate with the form of government they prefer. Those people can move though, but at 2/3 vote for something as drastic moving from one country to another, something is clearly there and it's the right choice for it to change.

My hope is that if this thing exists and can help set up new standards for how boarders are drawn that it will decrease war. Most boarders are a consequence of war and not from being such an effective nation that people want to join it. It completely changes the incentives for nations that want more land.

In some ways philosophy then dictates what can be done domestically, but a different philosophy governs the boarder. It could almost be said to be two separate governments with different operating principles. The boarder views itself as having absolute power and considers only the existential needs of the people and their safety. Because drugs would be legal domestically and the movement of drugs into the united states would be an existential threat to the nation, the existence of customs would exist. Boarder crossings could be quite invasive. Also because patent and copyright law wouldn't exist it could go beyond drugs.

Edit: Best part. No capital punishment except for corruption. Any misapplication of government authority by its agents, if it benefits the agent, caused harm, and was clear that the agent knew what he was doing.. that's a hanging. Big or small.

x0x7 · 2019-08-06T04:12:12+00:00

If I made a small nation (about the size of a county) where the immigration policy involved psychological screening and only the most healthy and high IQ individuals would be let it, would you be interested in moving to it?

Also it would be a psuedo-anarcho-monarchy. Basically it would be anarcho-capitalist with a head of state to fill the seat and to interact with other nations. The border is not anarchist in order to make sure only those who can abide other people's freedoms are let it and to appease the neighboring county. Build what you want, trade what you want. And super minimal taxes paid in bitcoin based on a georgist model (adjusted by population density).

x0x7 · 2019-08-06T04:05:04+00:00

Because they make the rules to bind up everyone else, and provide exceptions to themselves.

x0x7 · 2019-08-06T04:02:04+00:00

I posted both. Mind blown.

x0x7 · 2019-08-06T04:00:04+00:00

Yeah, let's create a libertarian/Communist/Nazi party.

x0x7 · 2019-07-27T02:25:21+00:00

x0x7 · 2019-07-25T19:44:50+00:00

Exciting

x0x7 · 2019-07-25T19:33:53+00:00

You know what they say about suicide. If they know the Clintons it's definitely just a suicide.

x0x7 · 2019-07-24T19:59:47+00:00

Said no one ever.

x0x7 · 2019-07-24T19:55:43+00:00

"This coming generation will likely never eat as much food as their parents had."

Well then fuck food. Food doesn't work then. If food actually worked we would always have more food than prior. If we do things that are negative to the production of food in our fuck you to food then that's still food's fault for there being less of it.

You will likely not earn as much in part because we are less capitalistic and more socialistic. That lowers real incomes. Also because of the federal reserve. Low interest rates cause a miscalculation in which projects are most productive. It results in a lot of semi-makework in the market. That's why it raises employment. But like all makework you end up tired with less reward despite the effort.

x0x7 · 2019-07-23T13:37:58+00:00

If it came from the government it was stolen no matter what. The government shouldn't be spending on corporations unless it is a do or die need.

x0x7 · 2019-07-23T13:22:00+00:00

You have to have a separation of business and state. Corporations should not have access to the use of force provided by the government, except in the prevention of theft, and corporations should be free from the state's violence.

Things are just more honest that way.

x0x7 · 2019-07-22T20:21:13+00:00

Anyone can, including you.

x0x7 · 2019-07-22T12:58:56+00:00

Using that as an excuse to get the government involved in the internet would be a bad idea. You do not want the government in the internet.

It's bad enough that we gave them money. Let's not use government being involved in something they shouldn't as an excuse to double the amount they are involved in something they shouldn't.

Stop giving them money..? Government shouldn't be giving money to corporations anyway especially when they lobby.

Separation of government and business is the best way to fight corruption.

x0x7 · 2019-07-22T02:54:16+00:00

https://tube.poal.co/watch?v=liP8uIcUAhI

x0x7 · 2019-07-22T02:52:41+00:00

Unmanned drones are probably the worst attack on the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. Also so we can blow up some people who aren't a threat to the US domestically, and so we can piss off enough people enough that they are now.

Negative defense utility.

x0x7 · 2019-07-21T21:30:07+00:00

It's hard to say when they have so many proven ties with more that Israel.

Us (US), Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel. They really are state sponsored terrorism and it's sad that we smear Iran with that accusation while we ourselves engage in it.

It's like when we complain about Russian interference. It's only bad when our enemies do it.

x0x7 · 2019-07-19T03:37:05+00:00

People are trying to take short cuts cleaning the lenses.

If you want to clean your contacts without taking them out spray your eyes with Windex.

x0x7 · 2019-07-19T03:30:56+00:00

What if there are different levels of intelligence and contentiousness. I can act on a rock and manipulate it and contemplate it.

A rock can't contemplate manipulating me. I thereby am in the most prominent position to act being more intelligent that the other.

If the universe is infinite then physical arraignments that are said to be able to take action exist and exist in all degrees that is the distribution of stages of intelligence, until the maximal kind of intelligence possible. Therefor God exists.

Now sufficiently highly intelligent things are not only able to act on less intelligent systems in meaningful ways, but they can also manipulate them to take on forms that are more intelligent. A processor is more intelligent than a pile of sand. It got that way because we organized it. Similarly you being more intelligent than your children can influence them to be more intelligent later on.

Now a rock cannot direct anything to become more intelligent even though it can maintain its space using electron interactions and can maintain its structure with a structure on internal election interactions, something that hydrogen, less organized can't do.

Now you can similarly do the things a rock can. Higher intelligence things do not lose the abilities of lower intelligence things.

x0x7 · 2019-07-19T03:14:50+00:00

Ok, first off, the sponsor is the bill is Rigel Robinson. That sounds pretty gendered to me. Why doesn't he change his name and worry about the beam in his own eye before the mote in others?

First off his document directs the city MANager to do some cost assessments on implementing a small part of their bullshit.

It also says that city staff should develop a timeline and financial plan for impleMENting a proposed change to forms. Are they implying that it's men's role to implement things by using that language?

https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Clerk/City_Council/2019/03_Mar/Documents/2019-03-12_Item_17_Use_of_Gender_Neutral_Language.aspx

x0x7 · 2019-07-19T03:04:25+00:00

I'm going to call it now. The document banning it is also gendered. I'mma look this up.

x0x7 · 2019-07-19T03:01:54+00:00

While I think your alarm is mostly unfounded, because people can still use any currency they want including bitcoin cash..

I think you would have a fun time reading Revelation and what it says about the beast.

x0x7 · 2019-07-18T18:55:08+00:00

I think they were downvoting because of the stance of the title rather than because of what the F-Droid spokesman said.

x0x7 · 2019-07-18T13:47:41+00:00

Also a meta discussion of the issue I've started here. https://notabug.io/t/whatever/comments/20437b4f8b8cbd07f9ec264b0e166c1619fe7f67/cant-argue-so-just-downvote

I guess I'm asking you to help me win a fight, if you want. I kind of have to go off to work. I think it's a worthy cause.

x0x7 · 2019-07-11T10:05:51+00:00

One of them seems to.

x0x7 · 2019-07-09T19:47:05+00:00

It's like that dazzle paint used on ships in WWI. http://yargb.blogspot.com/2012/03/wwi-dazzle-painting.html

x0x7 · 2019-07-09T04:10:56+00:00

The common jew needs to stop being so gullible and giving money to zionist causes. They end up becoming finance for someone's racketeering. Jews have been lying to gentiles but they've also been lying to other jews. As a jew you should know to not be so gullible.

For example the former president of the World Jewish Congress Edgar Bronfman's daughter Clare Bronfman has been the main financial backing behind NXIVM, which recently got charged for human trafficking.

He was just convicted on the 19th of last month. Every single month the memes are being satisfied if you dig deep enough. There is something going on.

Stop giving them money you retard. You are going to give jews a bad name when you enable these psychopaths that wave zionism infront of you. Easiest way to part a jew from his pennies is to mention zionism.

x0x7 · 2019-07-05T21:33:17+00:00

Determining the cpu level might be expensive per page render and any means that isn't isn't going to be very fine resolutioned and therefore would be resonant.

A solution would be to have a rolling array of the timestamps of each of the last 15 renders. If the oldest of the last 15 is very new then let the page cache longer. That's assuming you have a cache in the first place though.

Then basically you can set a maximum frequency that your rendering engine will work at that you know your cpu can't surpassed anyway so you might as well not queue the task, and just defer to cache for one more request.

If you were using nodejs I could show you how to do it.

x0x7 · 2019-07-05T02:35:17+00:00

Well you know it will benefit the chinese in some way. The US being less involved in every corner of the globe would benefit them. But it would also benefit us.

x0x7 · 2019-07-05T02:34:06+00:00

Not soft ttl. The idea is that it caches longer if the cpu is overloaded.

Usually on cloudflare you can only set something to be either cached or uncached. Your dynamically generated content is likely not being cached by cloudflare, just your javascript and images.

x0x7 · 2019-07-05T00:14:12+00:00

You could cache the pages with a soft ttl. Every page's content updates at most every 5 seconds. After 5 seconds a new calculation can be performed if and only if the server is at an acceptable load level. Otherwise the old content is used.

x0x7 · 2019-07-03T23:13:04+00:00

This guy is an idiot.

"The idea that a bunch of billionaires can just swoop in and change the thinking of washington and that will actually work is something I disagree with on principle. The same system that allows them to do that is the same system that allows... [talks about other moneyed interests spending money on the opposite]".

Ok. So you agree that rich people can impact the view washington has. You just validated the point.

By that argument there would be no condition of life in which you would defend yourself.

The idea that you can defend yourself by throwing a punch and it actually resulting in any defense doesn't work in principle. It''s using the same system that allows bullies to be bullies, namely physics. So that same system obviously can't be operated in, in any way that could be any benefit..

The guy is complaining that someone is spending money on anti-war and he has to get on his high horse and explain why that's actually a bad thing.

x0x7 · 2019-07-03T11:29:22+00:00

BTW, I'm not a country boy. Anyone can make efforts to lower their reliance on the state, and even on commercial services. My view, less political, is that it's good to prepare for seasons without government or commercial support. Just a little planning and what would be a disaster for one is a cake walk for you.

A bit strange but I have discovered the best way to do this is to set shorter seasons to go without these things. Before long the infrastructure is in place that you really can go without what others would call a necessity. It just really gives you peace of mind. Between rain collection and owning a backflushable filter (not expensive things) I will never have to worry about water ever.

Also the issue with flouride is that people have said some dubious things to get attention in conspiracy circles. Here is what is certainly true. A lifetime of exposure increases bone brittleness so when you are older you are more likely to have breaks. It has absolutely no utility because fluoride as a dental treatment is supposed to be topical, is only really useful for a kind of tooth decay common in 9 year olds who will get new teeth anyway, and toothpaste already has fluoride in it.

x0x7 · 2019-07-02T15:45:03+00:00

Are you going to pay for roads to be built?

No. Our nation's reproduction rate was highest when there were nearly no roads built by the government. We had less technology then which meant it took more labor to get anything out of the Earth. Yet still people had enough to eat. Enough so to have tons of children. Roads are not a necessity and to the extent they are people can build them and provide them as a service.

Am I going to pay for veteran's care when they come home from war.

No. We won't have war without taxes. Why do governments support war in places like Iraq except to conquer and increase their tax base or help US companies that will then pay more taxes.

Who says I don't pay my taxes. I just claim that I am stolen from when I do, which is accurate.

Quit asking for free shit you DeadWeight fucking joke.

Fucking retard commies that don't even realize they are commies. Build me a road daddy. I need you to provide for me daddy govt. Little baby.

I get my water out of a rain barrel while you literally suck at the government's teat. It's actually really really easy to provide for yourself. Enjoy the fluoride.

x0x7 · 2019-07-02T15:27:46+00:00

Lol, think again. There is a reason why tests have shown that cops hesitate more to shoot a black person over a white person. They are afraid of the consequences.

I guess I shouldn't say lol. There's nothing funny about it.

x0x7 · 2019-07-02T12:08:11+00:00

Taxation is theft.

Also if we go to a resturant and I order $10 of food, and you order $7 of food, but I pay 3/4 of the bill, but we adjust it so it's more fair that's not really a gift to me.

x0x7 · 2019-07-02T12:05:38+00:00

Should be hung. Misuse of government powers should be a capital offense. Don't like it? Then don't work for the government, or obey the law.

x0x7 · 2019-07-02T12:04:26+00:00

Joe Biden is a racist.
Hillary Clinton is a racist.
Iroquois Warren is a straight up cultural appropriator.

Racist is a selective belief applied to republicans as a smear.

x0x7 · 2019-07-02T11:54:36+00:00

That's why the shannon entropy forumla is so great. It tells us in somewhat more objective terms when a market is too restricted. Compared to complaining about random arbitrary actions inconsistently like Microsoft including internet explorer in their OS, (yet android provides some chrome variant and several other apps). Microsoft was a monopoly when it hit a certain market share, not when a free browser came with it.

With how arbitrarily we apply these rules a company has to be politically unpopular before anything can be done.

Then we need to adjust how we take care of monopolies. "Breaking them up" geographically doesn't work. Then you just have monopolies in different regions but no real options for consumers.

What that shannon entropy really does is calculate how predictable someone's choice is. If in a particular geographic area you can predict who they will end up using then it a monopoly.

My idea is to require them to give free advertising to competitors for a period.

x0x7 · 2019-07-01T13:14:03+00:00

It's funny because technology keeps solving the same problem over and over using underlying technology that's already solved it to do it.

The problem of getting text in one place to another is what, text messaging, email, facebook messanger, whatsapp, imessage, telegraph.. are. It's also what TCP/IP and UDP are. It's also what HTTP is.

So how are the going to distinguish between "messaging" apps and technologies that do messaging but don't brand themselves as user-focused. Is using TLS with http going to be illegal?

Technically all text messaging does or whatsapp does at the end result level is allows you to send text to an identifier (username or phone number). Well if I have an identifier (ip address), I could technically receive messages over http the same as whatsapp. The only difference is the http is not typically used that way. Am I allowed to do that with TLS?

Oh sure, whatsapp has a UI that displays the message, but is it the UI that's illegal?

x0x7 · 2019-07-01T12:20:25+00:00

So I've studied a few market shares in my life. For top 5, 95% is expected.

What would the top 5 browser share be?

What would the top 5 search be?

What would the top 5 lighter manufacturers be?

More important is the top 1 and top 2. When the top 1 is 90% then you have a problem. That is search, and soon to be browsers.

Use the shannon entropy formula to determine how restricted a market is. For example if a market was 80,10,5,5. I would gladly give that up for, 60,34,4,2.

The first has 1.0219280948873624
The second has 1.2699844663844981

x0x7 · 2019-07-01T12:02:30+00:00

I'm for passing laws where we hang the cops. Misconduct with government resources is not a game. Government is capable of the greatest abuse and it's need to be handled responsibly goes beyond any other institution.

I'm for this for elected officials, buerocrates. police. If you work for the government, you have to obey the law. At the very least you have to obey the law with the resources you're given professionally.

x0x7 · 2019-07-01T11:47:14+00:00

Tyrany of 1000 tyrants.

x0x7 · 2019-06-27T21:04:00+00:00

OMG, you said anything about any subject at all. That just serves to distract from the fact that Israel runs most things in the US.

FTFY.

Who's to say it distracts. Depending on your world view it could be additive.

One could say that posting an article about how reuters doesn't have an article about reddit banning the veritas video is a distraction.

x0x7 · 2019-06-25T02:30:57+00:00

Well, they are reckless people who don't understand economics or business, but pretend they do.

Sanders once said that children are starving in child labor camps because you have too many brands of water to choose from.

Let's point out that most of wall street does not sell the top product. A few of them do. If Sander's had his way most of those companies would go bankrupt to the benefit of the biggest corporations, because product diversity is bad.

x0x7 · 2019-06-25T02:24:26+00:00

A note to Germany telling them to divert as many forces against Russians as possible and to just give up as much land as they can to the western allies.

The number of women you would save from being raped would far out value anything you could make with bitcoin.

x0x7 · 2019-06-25T02:22:32+00:00

Or this guy becomes more credible.

x0x7 · 2019-06-25T02:20:17+00:00

Why not a year or two before to give some lead time?

x0x7 · 2019-06-09T14:40:28+00:00

That did not go to a discussion about that.

x0x7 · 2019-06-09T14:39:25+00:00

"accident"

x0x7 · 2019-06-09T14:23:01+00:00

I spent a lot of time not working. It was pretty unfulfilling and I spent all the time worrying about problems that didn't matter.

I take it you work, hence why you are resentful towards it and try to push that it's not normal.

You should try not working. It's retarded.

When you don't want to work, that becomes your job. There's a lot of over time, not many days off.
Sometimes it just gets hard to explain to people that I know, or kids who come to shows, I just don't want to talk about the office today.

That or you could learn frugality, and fill almost 100% of your time with work but take it easy, and you will have an abundance past your needs and life is pretty rewarding. Having more security means you can be more picky with what you want to do. That means when you are infrugal you are just fucking yourself over. Then you can work fewer hours in your day job and spend more time working on what you enjoy. But you have to make what you enjoy partially pay for itself to decrease the comparative cost of switching one hour for another, otherwise being frugal won't exactly save you hours (it will but not as many).

x0x7 · 2019-06-07T04:39:13+00:00

Be suspicious of Ron Paul's support of peace. /s

I'll take it either way. What am I going to do? Agree with the people calling for censorship?

x0x7 · 2019-06-07T04:30:47+00:00

He's a NSF and NASA shill. The government shouldn't be allowed to spend money on promoting being allowed to spend more money.

x0x7 · 2019-06-07T04:21:38+00:00

Everything he says is scientifically wrong. It's like he goes out of his way to do it. I think he adopted a school of thought that you have to misdescribe things to dumb them down to others but often its no more simple and doesn't fit. You could always just tell people less rather than make shit up.

But it's also little things. In response to the song flat-line that talks about nasa negatively and claims that the Earth is flat, Neil attempted to prove that the Earth is round . A worthy and praiseworthy thing to do. But he said that because the Earth is round and it is spinning and was once liquid, as a result when the Earth formed it was stretched out in the middle. And because of that the elevation of sea level is higher near the equator.

What is wrong... The oceans are an independent liquid body and experience that stretching independent of the shape of the Earth (mostly) and so you would see that effect regardless.

Every single time there is something wrong whenever he opens his mouth.

(Yes I know that the non-uniform shape of the Earth makes he gravitational field slightly less uniform but that effect would be tiny compared to what the oceans experience through centrifugal force. And before you call me out on "centrifugal" at least my logic isn't fundamentally wrong like his is.)

But the sad thing about his peacocking how smart he is with fake science was that it was just deflecting the point of the song, which is that because government runs the science program known as NASA everything NASA does is a military project. "I don't have to address that if just brag how smart I am."

x0x7 · 2019-06-06T13:29:24+00:00

I'm sorry. Correction. It's only a phobia if its an irrational fear of gays.

x0x7 · 2019-06-06T13:27:43+00:00

I also did a tenth of an hour chart that shows I probably have some outlier incidents impacting the chart.

https://jssocial.pw/ppkey/fget/x0x7/upload/Tenth%20Hour%20Traffic.png

So I would suggest smoothing the chart (with your mind) where the spikes in the tenth hour chart correspond with the hour chart.

x0x7 · 2019-06-06T10:31:05+00:00

Amen.

x0x7 · 2019-06-06T10:27:37+00:00

I don't get it. He doesn't seem to have a molecule of appreciation in any of his bones.

Snowden. Warns secret program could be used for political abuse.

Obama administration uses it for political abuse against Trump. Trump is mad about Snowden's warnings.

Assange. Does free opposition research. Trump gives him a life sentence.

He and Feinstein must be siblings because Feinstein went out and defended these programs and then when she found out that congress was being spied on she got really upset about it. These people only dislike these programs when they get spied on.

x0x7 · 2019-06-06T10:19:00+00:00

It's not homophobic. It's not like he said he's scared of gays.

x0x7 · 2019-06-06T00:48:09+00:00

I like these rules. So simple.