all 5 comments

[–]xoenix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a shit show.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hostile architecture.

[–]LordoftheFlies 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Activist Hazel Williams, who has been an ardent critic of the planters, argued the program may legalize anti-homeless architecture.

Anyone care to bet that Hazel doesn't live anywhere that her life can be troubled by those homeless?

[–]IMissPorn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm certainly not a fan of regulations, but I can't say it seems too weird for a city to want a say in how much you can obstruct the sidewalk. I don't really see why there should be a permit rather than just some guidelines to follow, though. That part probably is for "woke" reasons.

[–]AAAAAASSSSSSSSDDDDDD 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

just wait until the wild hogs invade san francisco and start eating the homeless.

https://youtu.be/44wycvb_V74