Misgendering Mania

Vulptex · 2022-08-15T02:22:01+00:00

magnora7 is the owner of saidit

Vulptex · 2022-08-15T02:21:08+00:00

Prone to escaping, so never forget to tie me up when you're not watching me.

Vulptex · 2022-08-15T01:57:04+00:00

I wouldn't have and I still wouldn't.

Vulptex · 2022-08-15T01:55:43+00:00

One active user is hardly the equivalent of control.

Vulptex · 2022-08-15T01:52:03+00:00

Well, we were the same until the fall. Read Genesis 2-3 closely, no gender distinctions pop up until the curses for eating the forbidden fruit. In fact the first man would not accept a partner until they were exactly like him.

And since יהוה is clearly an addition to the original manuscript of this part of the book, it's unclear who the elohim is. His short temper and fits of vengeance certainly don't like the merciful יהוה of chapter 4 who protects murderers.

Vulptex · 2022-08-15T01:41:24+00:00

I don't the the woke LGBT controls saidit, or 95% of us would've been banned by now.

Vulptex · 2022-08-14T05:10:42+00:00

It's also because women have 2398657958169786597862397861276439875263789153 times more biological value than men. It's a lot safer to accidentally punish an innocent man, but disposing of even the most guilty woman can risk decimating your population, so they tend to be let off the hook.

Vulptex · 2022-08-14T05:07:55+00:00

It's in our instincts to always defend women no matter what. Someone I know is currently in serious trouble over a blatantly false accusation of sexual harassment by a girl who is apparently a psychopath, but the mob is taking her word for it and shutting out anyone who tries to speak up. These days it's guilty until proven innocent for most crimes, and that's especially true of allegations against men of sexually abusing a woman. Our instincts recognize that it's safer to accidentally defend a guilty woman and punish an innocent man because women hold 100000000000000x more value than men biologically. And the current wave of female-supremacist feminism isn't making matters any better. This is why women can get away with a slap on the wrist for extreme crimes, such as literally having sex with minors, and people will defend her and try to cover it up.

Vulptex · 2022-08-14T04:56:35+00:00

It's not a joke. I'm 100% serious.

Vulptex · 2022-08-14T04:55:54+00:00

captainmeta4 started acting like spez, then when he did his first major banwave and realized his users weren't going to tolerate it he shut down the site. And for a long time they had been corrupted by certain members of their Discord server and listened only to them.

Vulptex · 2022-08-13T22:24:15+00:00

Haha, if you guys think being gay is weird, imagine not being attracted to anyone and just wanting to be tied up. Not even with sexual acts involved, just sitting there, fully clothed. Becuse somehow that's where I landed, seriously.

Vulptex · 2022-08-13T22:21:30+00:00

It's definitely a simulation.

Vulptex · 2022-08-13T22:19:41+00:00

I've heard a lot of these women go back to being lesbians once they get older and their hormones decrease again.

Vulptex · 2022-08-13T02:24:05+00:00

If you're talking about the LGBTQIAPFABCDEFG+ cult, which is mostly just bisexuals who only date the opposite sex and trans people who identify as cats and don't even take hormones, then yeah, he pisses them off just by existing, along with all the other radical left SJWs. Because to them Trump is the devil himself, he can do no right. But outside of that there are plenty of LGBT who like Trump, and also aren't hostile to religion and don't demand special privileges and censorship of everything they don't like.

Vulptex · 2022-08-13T00:11:18+00:00

I've researched his transgender military ban, and just as I had suspected it had nothing to do with transphobia. His primary concerns were trans people hijacking military benefits to get free transitions, and the possibility of abusing HRT drugs while in the military. As for the trans veterans, Trump praised them for their service.

He never reversed gay marriage either. He occasionally claims he will when trying to appeal to his fundamentalist voterbase, but otherwise he has about as much interest in doing that as Biden does in not banning fracking. I believe when he was being honest he firmly agreed that the matter is "settled" and he has no problem with it. Trump is a businessman, not a theocrat.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T18:56:05+00:00

The question is whether merely saying the AOC should be lowered is actually sexualizing children, and there's a case to be made for both conclusions.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T17:00:54+00:00

Then why is there no draft? And why would trans people be drawn to it?

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T16:00:58+00:00

The military severely fucks up peoples' minds. Perhaps it can cause GD-like symptoms, or weaken someones' mental health so if they have it mild they can't manage it anymore when they could before.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T15:56:56+00:00

I don't really know that this is lolcow material, this time it sounds like the gender dysphoria is actually causing the depression and suicidal thoughts. Anime isn't mentioned, and it usually is if they're faking it. But you never do know the full story.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T15:47:34+00:00

Anyway Trump has some smart ideas, but he's way too full of himself and doesn't know how to conduct himself in public. It's clear, he can't control his ego, and he blurts things out he really shouldn't be saying in public, then boasts about it. He has zero respect for anyone but himself, to the point where he thinks he's the Messiah and everyone else is a "loser". So while the media is always going to give non-leftists a hard time, he's really asking for it. Perhaps intentionally, because he can use that to draw attention to himself and take advantage of the Streisand effect.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T15:41:17+00:00

Mr Trump so nastily offended the LGBT that I don't even want to get into it.

When did that happen?

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T15:35:38+00:00

and it's still not a very good one

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T01:36:10+00:00

Man should not accept traditions with blind faith, but should scrutinize every doctrine to know whether it be true.

Nor should man accept the light seen at death with blind faith, but scrutinize every vision to know whether it be true.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T01:29:33+00:00

What makes you think jet199 is a government actor?

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T01:28:41+00:00

It's only realist when you have hood gangster culture and mass media actively encouraging it, because black people "deserve" to commit crimes against white people as reparations for their distant ancestors having slaves. If black people grow up outside of that environment they're no worse than white people.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T01:02:39+00:00

No, all it did was destroy towns and lives, and turn once-normal people into actual racists.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T01:00:46+00:00

No, soundsituation has been has been here for many months already. And no, there's no government op.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T00:21:36+00:00

I tend to stick to mostly cut and dry stuff like spam (which there's a surprising amount of for such a small website). If there's any doubt, I err on the side of not removing it and ask magnora7 if necessary.

Vulptex · 2022-08-12T00:07:50+00:00

It actually is the best treatment, and it's still not a very good one, hardly a cure. And the fact that they refuse to screen people, to make sure they actually have it before going ahead with all these treatments, should make it clear that they have dubious intentions.

It's just like how some people have suspected the medical industry has or could have the cure for cancer and many other illnesses by now, but they cover it up because they make exponentially more money on the treatments, which also make the patient dependent on them. And in this case they have the added bonus that transgenderism is trendy right now and comes with several political perks.

Vulptex · 2022-08-11T23:57:18+00:00

I'm guessing his thought process was along the lines of "Well he thinks the age of consent should be lowered, but he never actually sexualized minors." But if he wasn't sure he should've asked the site owner (u/magnora7), probably the only one who should be making such dangerous calls.

Also, the approval could've been an accident. I do that sometimes. The approve button doesn't have any confirmation, so it's very easy to hit by accident, especially on mobile, and there's no way to undo it. Anyone who's been a mod here or on reddit will probably tell you the same thing. I've actually wondered if reddit set it up that way on purpose so they can "catch" mods approving the wrong posts, and then use that as an excuse to ban them or the entire subreddit.

Vulptex · 2022-08-11T22:45:17+00:00

I don't see anything wrong with it.

Vulptex · 2022-08-11T22:43:50+00:00

Jeremiah 7-8

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T19:12:02+00:00

No, I meant to ask if liking being on the receiving end speaks of an unhealthy mind.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T19:09:52+00:00

No one denies that most of these books existed. So why are they all missing, and why is there nothing at all from before the church redacted the ones we do have?

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T16:08:32+00:00

Yes it was. We only have one single copy of a poorly-made Coptic translation of it, because by a freak accident someone recently found it in a jar that had been buried for almost 2000 years. We have a few tiny scraps of a Greek version, but that's it. Everything else was burned. Why do you think there's such a complete lack of any texts from before the 3rd or 4th century? That just so happens to be about the time the church began persecuting "heretics" and burning their books. What happened to all the extra-canonical books, and the original versions of the canonical ones? Where are all the Marcionite Bibles? Where is the gospel of the Hebrews, Ebionites, and Nazarenes, and the "Judaikon"? How about Secret Mark? Most of the gnostic books? What happened to the so-called Q source? Why was the original Hebrew of Matthew only kept by Jews? Where is the book of Enoch? The Hebrew of certain apocrypha books? The gospel of Peter? Why are all these important scriptures missing? Most of them survived well into the middle ages and even revolutionary times. It's because the church persecuted "heretics" and burned their materials because they didn't want anyone reading them. If anything still survives it's locked up deep within the Vatican's secret archives.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T14:59:20+00:00

What about the other way around?

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T14:18:44+00:00

The Old Testament has been severely corrupted over millenia. It used to be a lot more like the New Testament (which is itself corrupted, but not as much since they've had a lot less time to do it).

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T13:59:20+00:00

You probably shouldn't be sharing your personal information like that.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T11:49:52+00:00

Not for UI though. Actually never let programmers design the UI. I feel that's the only real reason open source projects are so far behind the commercial ones, despite usually being more powerful, because they seem to mostly disregard this rule.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T11:43:20+00:00

...did you just post your real name?

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T11:32:17+00:00

Uhh...I hope that's a fake phone number. You really shouldn't be posting stuff like that online.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T11:13:25+00:00

Just don't search the politicians' pockets, they already looked there.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T11:08:32+00:00

How about me too? I'm not a very good slave but can you just keep me tied up all the time? I shouldn't add to the sewage bill either, I can crap wherever you want, and don't even worry about letting me out to piss, just leave me there and make me pee in my pants.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T10:57:00+00:00

No, they only cared about controlling people and neutralizing Christianity's threat. That's why they assembled the Bible and burned all the other books.

Vulptex · 2022-08-10T01:24:53+00:00

That probably never happened. The early church not only debated whether John is an authentic document, but even among those who accepted it most either did not believe this particular story or thought it was metaphorical. Considering he never does anything like this elsewhere and it's 100% out of character for him, I tend to agree. Note that the other gospels only mention his driving them out, nothing about the whip.

Vulptex · 2022-08-09T14:10:24+00:00

Yeah, driving people out of the temple with no further punishment is so predatory and dangerous. You know that's the closest he ever came to that. But the masses awaiting him sure wanted him to crush all their enemies and rule the world with a ruthless iron fist for them. When he didn't do that they did unspeakable things to him.

Women are no more peaceful than men. They simply don't need to go as far to get what they want, because men are expected to hand them most things. If she doesn't want to risk it, she can just ask a man to do it for her, and he is practically obliged. A man doesn't have that option, the vast majority of people will not help him and care not the slightest bit about him. In fact this puts women in a better position to manipulate, so while they are not inherently any more manipulative than men, they do end up manipulating a lot more. This isn't exactly peaceful. Hitler didn't kill all the Jews himself, but he was pulling the strings and approved of it. Nor did Stalin himself send tens of millions of people to the gulag and starve them to death, but he ordered it. But when it's a woman we tend to cover up her misdeeds and blame them on a man, even she did do them herself. Look at how judges give women criminals 60 seconds in jail for serious crimes but practically shoot men in the head for petty offenses. And that's if we're even willing to admit that a woman did something bad at all. We elevate women as if they're royalty, and when does royalty ever get into violence? They always order someone else to do it for them. That's the only reason women are "more peaceful" in this society. Inside they are no different. If you really think they are, try aggrevating a mother bear or any animal that doesn't stay partnered and see what happens. I don't recommend it.

Vulptex · 2022-08-09T10:51:35+00:00

I don’t respect you because of your belief.

You must not respect very many people then, if your standards are 100% agreement with you on everything.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T23:30:02+00:00

Well fuck evolution, and no, being predatory and dangerous is not good. Especially for a Christian.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T20:48:24+00:00

Why do only men lose privacy?

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T18:37:01+00:00

I believe her, but beyond a doubt it's sexual for the men buying them.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T18:29:25+00:00

I've lived most of my life around Republicans. I can tell you they were NOT fascist until two years ago when they reacted out of fear to liberals burning down entire towns over one incident where a cop murdered a black criminal, with no evidence that it was even racially motivated. When you behave like that, people are going to flee to the exact opposite of what you advocate for. So when liberals claim to represent minorities, and then do things like that, of course it's going to make others weary of minorities. Guilt by association is very powerful, even if it's a false association; it can easily slander an entire population. So too is the Streisand effect: when the people behaving that way do nothing but complain about fascism, and constantly accuse their opponents of fascism, their opponents will be drawn to fascism because they feel if their enemy is suppressing something, there's probably something good about it.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T16:39:43+00:00

Yeah people who think like that are both extremely sexist and make people with gender dysphoria look like complete idiots. Sadly they are many thanks to the trans movement.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T16:35:13+00:00

There probably is a cause, but it's not detectable. And when you limit it down to people who actually have gender dysphoria and aren't just saying they "feel" like the other gender, most of them are either gay or have an unusual sexuality anyway.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T16:31:51+00:00

Sexuality is actually the only detectable difference so far.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T16:30:54+00:00

Why do the last 3 even exist?

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T16:28:45+00:00

Ehhh...not really. We can detect if someone has learned how to play Super Mario Bros., but we still can't figure out what the differences are between the sexes, or if there even are any that aren't hormonal. But what does make them seem so different is how everything humans do is trying to look attractive for the other sex. Look at young kids or people with autism and you won't find such a huge gap.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T16:21:44+00:00

The difference would be so small it's probably impossible to detect. Plus they're looking in the wrong places. Ever since leftists who have no idea what this is about took over, everyone thinks it's a nice new way to have gender norms again. So they look for personality differences rather than where they would actually lie, which is probably body mapping, sensory perception, and instincts. Dissociation and loss of most talent is probably a sign too, because while it isn't easily visible from the outside the sexes do have different ways of thinking up similar results for some reason. The problem is it's only the inclination to think one way that manifests in GD, the rest of the brain still responds to hormones and develops assuming it's going to think the other (probably because this mostly doesn't happen until puberty). So I doubt it would be visible on a brain scan, but it could cause someone to suddenly lose their mind when they start puberty because they don't like or don't know how to use their remodeled one.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T15:59:11+00:00

have you ever met a woman who has fixing engines as a hobby?

Definitely. But she almost always has autism. Everyone else is shallow and stops having many genuine interests after childhood, they only hop on every bandwagon they can find. Actually men with those interests usually have autism too, they're just quite a bit more likely to have it. Interestingly autism is present in like 1000% of gender dysphoria cases.

I just hope it's a legit solution to their woes.

There is one legit solution: going to sleep forever! And that's not really an option either, so nothing can really be done about it (although FtM transitions work surprisingly well). Fortunately it's very rare, and the vast majority of people who claim to have it are mistaken or intentionally taking advantage of the new self-ID rule.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T15:35:45+00:00

Yeah that's the difference, most people never think about it, and if they do it's usually sexual objectification. If I asked any guy what he'd do if he were a woman he'd say something like play with his breasts. That sounds really dumb to me, and doesn't he realize that would lose its appeal? You already mentioned what you would do if you swapped. But if it were me I would do...nothing different. I just wouldn't have to deal with this body anymore, and I'd be in a much better spot to do what I'm already trying to do.

FYI there are some women who work in construction. And please don't beat up your neighbors.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T15:22:23+00:00

Why did you delete your account? We liked having you here.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T15:19:12+00:00

I did not say that, I said YHWH is an addition to it. Look closely. Every single use of YHWH is awkwardly followed by Elohim, and is dropped from the dialogue which scribes were less likely to alter. Then in chapter 4 YHWH is suddenly used exclusively, including in the dialogue. This fits their character, as the god of chapters 2-3 is clearly human-like and takes selfish vengeance over even petty mistakes, while the one in chapter 4 goes to great lengths to protect murderers. Now YHWH is identified as the son of the "most high" a few times, and his Greek name Κυριος is the same title used for Jesus, who has a very similar character to the YHWH of chapter 4, but nothing like the elohim in chapters 2-3. The exception would be the animal sacrifice part, which is also an obvious interpolation.

There are some more redactions. Genesis 2:6 is an obvious interpolation, because the previous verse says plants didn't grow because there was no rain yet, so why turn around and say a mist provided a water supply anyway? Genesis 2:10-15 is obvious interpolation as well, it tries to assign a geographic location to Eden and then clumsily ends by repeating verse 8, because it interrupted. There is a scribal error in Genesis 2:23, where the woman is called אשה because she was taken from איש, but that makes no sense. However the Samaritan version and the ancient Greek translation have אישה instead, which is a nice play on words. "crafty" and "naked" are spelled the same, ערום, as in the Samaritan version, probably another play on words. But the Jewish version found that too confusing and changed some instances of "naked" to the synonym עירם. And I think the entire first creation story is an interpolation from Babylonian times, not that it matters much since the whole book was assembled over time using smaller individual records which don't agree with each other.

Genesis 17:9-14 is really suspect because it interrupts the subject to insist on circumcision, in a way that looks suspiciously like some temple priest trying to "lay down the rules", just like the church fathers did with Paul's letters (which is why they're such a word salad, except for the fake letters to Timothy and Titus because they made them up in their entirety). 17:23-27 would go with it.

And why does Exodus 6:3 have YHWH saying he never revealed his name until now, yet people have known it countless times before that and Genesis 4:26 & 12:8 & 13:4 have people calling on the name of YHWH? There's more holes in these books than a piece of swiss cheese, it is abundantly clear that the religious institutions severely tampered with them.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T01:31:36+00:00

See, you don't even know. You never question anything, how easily can you be tossed into slavery and brainwashing! The world is 99.9% bad, so you can't blindly trust everything you come across.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T01:29:09+00:00

But that's only the elite social engineers, and most people don't figure that part out.

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T01:27:42+00:00

Luke 17:20-21

Vulptex · 2022-08-08T01:13:08+00:00

Elohim is a generic name for any deity. Even the Samuel apparition is called Elohim. Yes this opens up the possibility for gnostic-like notions of a demiurge, because YHWH in Genesis 2-3 is clearly an addition to the original manuscript.

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T20:26:09+00:00

There's a good possibility that Christ and Jesus used to be distinct. The early church fathers complain about certain heretics who preferred the gospel of Mark (which just so happens to be the earliest one) separating them. Jesus would be the person and Christ would be his power. Sometimes Paul uses Christ in a way that doesn't make sense if he's talking about a man, like "putting on" Christ. And in most of the places where it says "Jesus Christ" or "Christ Jesus", Marcion's version has only one of them.

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T20:12:57+00:00

Rather what's the use of putting 100% priority in propagating if your offspring are only supposed to do the same thing, and it keeps going forever?

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T20:10:13+00:00

I only considered the present time.

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T19:56:51+00:00

What's so strange about them?

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T18:20:39+00:00

Why? Because your brain makes you feel like it is not a valid answer. If life were all mindlessly natural we'd be doing nothing but killing each other in the most brutal ways while competing for mates. Civilization was made to escape those things, because our lives are worth more than some pointless game of dominance and natural selection. So how can you sit here and argue that there is nothing wrong with harming even young boys because their natural worth is lower than girls'? You see people as resources, utilities, and tools, not people. You dehumanize people and view them as objects. Therefore to you, abusing the less useful tool does not matter, because it has no value in your eyes. It is like throwing away a stick. But we are not robots, but prisoners of the flesh. So for the time being our selves must take priority over the game of life.

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T17:55:50+00:00

It doesn't feel like anything. The only way someone could say that is if their personality steps outside of gender roles and they think they're obligated to stick to stereotypes.

Well I shouldn't say it doesn't feel like anything. But that feeling happens as a result of your sex characteristics, it's no inborn identity. No one can feel like the opposite sex, except partially with medical interventions. That can be a serious problem if you don't like that feeling or the abilities it gives and takes away from you. Obviously a properly developing person would naturally be inclined to like them, sometimes fiercely, so that those functions are fulfilled and their vessel actually works. It's tragic when this doesn't happen correctly.

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T17:44:15+00:00

Well to be fair, those are exactly the ones who would be the best at physical activities. But it's probably still unfair whether it's natural or synthetic, because it gives such a massive advantage.

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T17:28:23+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_expendability

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T17:27:43+00:00

Why not? Because another man can easily replace you in fertilizing eggs so who cares about you?

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T17:23:13+00:00

You can tell it's a bot when everything it says is an unintelligible word salad, or it only copies from other people.

Vulptex · 2022-08-07T00:59:47+00:00

It's impossible. It would be like trying to explain colors to a colorblind person. In fact I bet you've never seen red-green or blue-yellow, and can't imagine them. But cross your eyes and get red and green or yellow and blue to overlap and you'll see it, something entirely new and unimaginable until now.

What I can assure you though is it's got everything to do with biology and nothing at all with "gender" however they're defining it today. It's also not normal at all to despise your sex characteristics; a little dread before puberty is typical, but it should not be persisting into adulthood at which point 99.9999% of people have embraced it. There are functional differences, it makes sense that a properly developing person has inclinations to match those functions, even though they're hardly noticeable in 3rd person. I can't stand how this feels, since puberty I can barely even think, and even before then I thought way too much about how it felt being the other sex. It was explicitly not social; I actually tried to rationalize it as wanting to stay the same gender, just with the body of the other one. Of course now I know that's all there is to being a certain gender, which took me way too long to figure out. But you won't ever get a trans activist to admit that, because they're too devoted to the "social construct" and anyone with dysphoria is transphobic to them for not pretending sex doesn't exist. What's even the point of this social construct? Just plain sexism? They don't even know, because this whole thing started as usual by sabotaging a troubled group and making into a wokeness competition, and like I said of course they can't understand it.

I would probably need a period of adjustment myself, but afterwards would be a lot better. There's also detrans people who gave themselves dysphoria by transitioning because of a fad.

Vulptex · 2022-08-06T23:12:34+00:00

There's a few subtle differences set up to function with sexual characteristics, at least that's all I can think of causing it. It wouldn't be like dysmorphia, you just wouldn't like it. Keep in mind that many of the differences are in perception and thought or even feeling, that's the hardest part. But the body isn't fun either. And one of the biggest blows is from envy, seeing everyone else cruise and adapt very well while you're stuck in a ditch I can assure you will never, ever get out of.

Vulptex · 2022-08-06T21:47:37+00:00

Not really actually, but only because it's where all the people are.

Vulptex · 2022-08-06T18:51:16+00:00

Berenstain*

Vulptex · 2022-08-06T17:33:10+00:00

It's not as bad as Discord. They openly admit to not accepting appeals. If you try Clyde will reject it automatically. Reddit at least has a human most of the time, and they'll usually accept it unless you're a high-profile dissident like I was. At least they used to, I haven't bothered with reddit for over two years now.

Vulptex · 2022-08-06T17:08:19+00:00

You're not getting the hint: it's not worth it. Your church probably doesn't want you to know about Matthew 19 and 1 Corinthians 7. They rarely discuss anything but Old Testament laws and the pastoral epistles, because the rest isn't useful for politics. Everything seems to be about this world and this life, and all they do is fight and condemn. It seems Christendom is being led by infants who are still wordly. I can see their influence on you in your attitude. Their conflicting messages confuse you, and each one claims that not obeying their ideas offends God. Almost any time someone talks about "offending God", what they really mean is you're offending them, and they assume that since they're offended, and they're always right, God must be too. But if you don't know, how can there be anything against you? They have tranformed God into a ruthless emperor, in hope of sharing in his corrupt reign, just like the Jews hoped their messiah would take over the world for them and persecute their enemies. But learn that "I came to serve, not to be served". And do you think every bad thing is God's wrath? That's another lie coming from every pulpit these days, just as Job's friends insisted that his struggles were a punishment for wrongdoing. All spiritual growth is prohibited in today's churches. If they were the real thing, why are they so popular? And why are they so lightly persecuted? It's all a trap, and unsuspecting social animals fall right into it. If you can't eradicate something, destroy it from within. The church fathers have been at this for millenia. I can show you plenty that they don't want you to see, and I believe I've barely scratched the surface.

I can't emphasize enough, it is not wrong to not marry. You are encouraged not to. Anyone who says otherwise is more concerned about passing down genes than anything that comes after, or even now if they hadn't shut it out. It's especially bad now that the church's political enemies have somehow managed to associate being alone with themselves, and since Christendom is little more than reactionary culture wars at this point that matters to them more than what their own religion says. There's also the problem of natural selection wiping out non-reproductive people, along with any good that manages to come into hell. But the narrow path is still there for you.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T20:49:38+00:00

Virtue signaling. They want everyone to know how woke and progressive they are. 99% chance they aren't even gay.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T20:47:12+00:00

Yep, and "all cis people are bigots!".

There's not many people who are 100% typical of one gender in every aspect, if any at all. That doesn't make everyone non-binary, it's just normal variation. But they want everyone to be non-binary, kind of like how furries claim everyone is a furry for watching cartoons with animal characters in them.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T16:31:14+00:00

No, they do nothing but brag about their supposed superiority.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T16:30:03+00:00

That's the thing, to them social constructs are very important. They're socialist, everything rightfully belongs to society in their eyes.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T16:27:21+00:00

Well let's hope it's just my experience then. But this happened to almost everyone I know irl at the exact same time it started taking over in online spaces.

From I can gather it went something like this: when BLM and Antifa rioted and looted and burned entire towns to the ground over non-existent racism, I think that image made conservatives see the threat as anarchist rather than totalitarian. So at that point they did a 180 and instead of emphasizing individual rights and small government, law and order is now their most important virtue. It also created a larger problem of guilt by association. Up to this point conservatives usually opposed identity politics and believed in simple equality. The left constantly claimed they were racist, sexist, everything-phobic bigots, but those claims rarely held water. But I think the rioting scared them so much that now they're afraid of anything associated with the left, including any minority they claim to represent. So lately a small bit of actual racism, sexism, etc. has gained traction among them. The recent threat has made them into partisan purists, so if you voice concern over this they grow afraid that you might be an enemy in disguise and will cast you out, even though it's exactly what they would've said 2 years ago. But they no longer have any principles, the only thing that matters now is exterminating the threat. And you can bet that people like John MacArthur are taking advantage of this fear to sway the masses.

For some reason the biggest new issue with them is gender roles. I'm not talking about transgenderism, I mean they are now obsessed with following the "natural order" where every man works and every woman stays home and raises a family, and they act stereotypical at all times. This is tragic, since it was largely them who defeated this nonsense in the first place. And the strongest argument against transgenderism was that sexist stereotypes need not force someone to switch genders to be themselves. Now the only things they can come up with are "it's degenerate" or "it offends God", which are both basically "I don't like it". And I don't even think they know why they don't like it anymore, only it's associated with their enemies so therefore it's bad. A few months ago one of my family members said I should join the CCP because I said gender roles are stupid. She never talked like this before, and would've certainly agreed with me until recently. This is happening to almost everyone I know, and it's taken off online as well. And if they're just going to become the other side of the same coin as the left, this country is doomed.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T04:33:25+00:00

A phantom body part is something you can feel that's not really there. That would actually alleviate dysphoria some.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T04:31:47+00:00

They're not really noticeable on the surface. But they do have different ways of arriving at the same result, and it does show when someone is expecting to do it one way but other parts of their wiring developed to do it the other.

Even spatial reasoning is just a trend, not a hard difference. That's the vast majority of sexual dimorphism. But it does add up, so there's no specific thing that's different, but the sum is significant. That's how you can almost always tell faces apart, even though there's no trait that all men have and all women don't, or vice versa. It really sucks when that doesn't work for you.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T04:19:40+00:00

As of now the only other treatment is the permanent cure: death.

It's a dark world we live in.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T04:18:15+00:00

They want to make it all social, as if it wouldn't exist at all if it weren't for "bigots" refusing to recognize gender identities. People with body dysphoria are transphobic because they claim there are biological differences, which our pseudo-science has thoroughly debunked (by merely saying so).

I will say though, if it were just one part you could very well be right. But when a whole bunch of problems all point to the same thing, I have trouble believing it's all coincidence.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T04:11:27+00:00

It's not phantom parts, it's distress from having or not having them. I imagine you'd be pretty upset if you switched bodies with someone of the opposite sex. The problem isn't feeling like something, it's not liking how you do feel. But you never hear that because only the idiots are useful for the entire reason behind all these progressive movements, which is political agendas.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T04:03:07+00:00

That might actually be the case sometimes, but sadly that's not the argument they make. They'd consider that transphobic because it assumes women don't have penises.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T03:55:02+00:00

So it sounds like the only observable difference then is sexuality.

There has to be a few others that deal with sexually dimorphic biology, but that's such a small difference I don't know if it can ever be detected. Nothing with an effect on cognitivity. There are some behavior and ability differences but they're all caused by hormones and only appear post-puberty, so that can't be the cause.

Vulptex · 2022-08-05T03:45:30+00:00

It's linked to poor motor skills and certain neurological disorders (which all happen to be caused by unusual prenatal hormones). The person doesn't respond to their biology in the right way. The key word to note there is biology. Not social roles, not gender, not personality.

But trans activists will only give you stereotypes. Because to them gender is a social construct and acknowledging biological differences is transphobic.

This is probably not something most people can comprehend without experiencing. That's why trying to draw awareness to it only results in a bunch of snowflakes flooding in because they don't understand and think it's about "diversity" and gender-nonconfirmity and identity, and then they just make it look stupid. Actually wanting to spread awareness in the first place is already a mistake, because for all who are afflicted this is a terrible disease to be treated and ignored as much as possible, not something to be celebrated. It's not an identity. Just like few cisgender people spend every waking moment thinking about gender. It's just not important. If someone does that, they probably don't have gender dysphoria, they have snowflake syndrome.

Vulptex · 2022-08-04T22:13:22+00:00

Watch that literally happen now.

Vulptex · 2022-08-04T22:06:15+00:00

Nope, they don't like Harry Potter anymore. Because his author is apparently a bigot.

Vulptex · 2022-08-04T22:04:53+00:00

It's not the "vast majority", but it is really high, like 40% iirc. But how many of gays are kid-fuckers is the real question, because I'm sure it's still a tiny minority.

Vulptex · 2022-08-04T22:02:00+00:00

And this has become the reality since about 2020.

Vulptex[A]

MODERATOR OF