all 29 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

They're covering up the ancient water erosion that was obvious to everyone who saw it.

The sphinx head was recarved from an ancient statue of a lioness.

The original statue is tens of thousands of years old. Probably over 100,000 years old.

It sounds crazy, right?

There's vertical water erosion pathways that are 3 to 4.5 feet deep into the rock surface of the body.

These are obviously created by water, and not wind.

https://www.robertschoch.com/sphinx.html

This erosion is inexplicable with the absurd 5000 year timeline, or the idea that Egyptians who fought on wooden chariot's could ever build the pyramids, or the sphinx.

These megaliths are relics from prior epochs of human civilizations.

Civilizations, which pre-date the catastrophe(s) that reset human civilization to zero.

They are erasing history. This is a crime.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

the idea that Egyptians who fought on wooden chariot's could ever build the pyramids, or the sphinx.

This is such dumb take.

The whole reason that cultures build pyramids, which are just big piles of rocks, is because they don't have the tech to build tall towers or massive building.

[–]Musky[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I figure every Brit is slightly salty that y'all couldn't fit the Sphinx in a British museum.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The whole reason that cultures build pyramids, which are just big piles of rocks, is because they don't have the tech to build tall towers or massive building.

Technically educated people understand that it's currently not possible to precision-fit 100 ton blocks of stone.

I'm not talking about the heavily eroded exterior stones.

I'm identifying the internal stone work, which are so tightly fit that you cannot slide a sheet of paper between them.

Yet we're supposed to believe people waging war with horse-drawn chariots and spears were able to do so.

There's a reason most people aren't taught about the insanely precise nature of the pyramids.

It completely unravels the false historical timelines of humanity.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they are not that precise inside - the majority of the stone

the exteriors are not that precise either that 'fit a thickness paper' thing is a mistaken quote

the outer limestone casing would have far more effort put into it (and also is easier to work than granite) , but it was a tiny fraction of the whole

the vast majority of the great pyramids stones are 2 tons or less

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

pyramids were an extension of the mastaba tombs

[–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's actually the ruins of Jabba's sail barge.

[–]binaryblob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This erosion is inexplicable with the absurd 5000 year timeline

If you make such claims, please link a complete fully verified simulation software package so we can too understand your claims as being more than the words of some complete moron. Perhaps you are a really smart guy, but you have not presented anything that could be interpreted as evidence.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Bro. These are both great channels. Thanks for the links.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I was starting to wonder if you had notifications set to off.

😁 😆 😅

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yep. How do you arrive at 100,000+ years old specifically though?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

3-4.5 ft deep erosion channels are not specific, but this is erosion one could expect in a riverbed but not a landscape surface on a desert.

For these erosion changes, the environment had to be very different, for a very long time.

But they cannot occur without ages of steady rainfall.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the things were painted once(or many times), might accelerants have been introduced that way ?

[–]binaryblob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Amnesia, I think.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The original statue is tens of thousands of years old. Probably over 100,000 years old.

It sounds crazy, right?

Yep.

https://www.robertschoch.com/sphinx.html

Oh, 10,000 years ago. Yeah, precipitation induced weathering studies come up with about that number. Kind of cool, since we have no evidence of an Egyptian civilization as old as that.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kind of cool, since we have no evidence of an Egyptian civilization as old as that.

Yep.

But how long would it take for rainfall to weather 3 to 4.5 feet deep channels. Not one or two in specific locations, but all over the body, and the enclosure walls.

The bedrock was carved away (down) to form the sphinx's body.
The enclosure walls have the same water erosion pattern.

The head rises above the bedrock level.

Envision a small meandering stream that's is located in a limestone valley.

If this small stream flows along a section of bedrock, then how many years of near-continuous flow would it take to erode 3-4.5 feet?

That's continuous flow.

How many years of seasonal rain cycles would it take to erode these grooves into the sphinx and it's enclosure???

It would take tens of thousands of years of rainfall. Easily.

Probably more.

[–]NastyWetSmear 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Stoney cat cake.

[–]Musky[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Little known fact, the inside is made of nougat.

[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Behold my creamy filling, ye mighty, and tremble!

[–]Musky[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

/u/Zommy took that pic.

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You saying u/Zommy is a back door man

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I like the tail.

[–]Musky[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Finally.

[–]at_finn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dat asp

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

has had 3 major repairs - some in ancient world times

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)