Ex-NYT Editor EMBARRASSES Brian Stelter On His Own Show (Even Weiss is starting to sound reasonable.. the world has indeed gone crazy) by Caliban in news

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I love how he quotes her writing and then he asks a question that is literally answered on the screen by the next sentences in her writing.

He really is such a pig wallowing in his own shit. I'm no fan of Bari Weiss, but at least she feel she's been forced to say the most obvious truths.

ACLU is explicitly arguing in court that the First Amendment's free speech clause has been interpreted *too broadly* by courts, and are advocating *a more restrictive view* of what free speech means. by Chipit in censorship

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Institutional capture. There is not a single institution with even the tiniest bit of power or influence that is not wholly owned by the evilest monsters roaming the earth.

Are Trans Women Real Women? NYC Women's March 2021 by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the second interviewee is expressing an idea no different than when liberals say certain African Americans are not black because of their political or social views. Words have no meaning, only power has meaning.

The Blue Fairy granted my wish and now I’m a real girl by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wait for the follow-up post about ingrown hair

It so weird that after realizing we are men, we are more willing to accept our femininity. by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://archive.is/XT1w3

That should be an archived version of the page so as to not drive traffic to the place that banned this sub. Reddit is for groomers and misogynists

German state allows ALL businesses to ban unvaxxed customers, even for groceries & other essentials by carn0ld03 in Europe

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is this "history repeats" or "the more things change, the more they stay the same"?

Texas Embalmer: "I was having people that had only been dead for a few hours and there were major clotting issues. The clots were the size of pancakes - you never, never see those with someone who didn’t die of COVID." by ISaidWhatISaid in Coronavirus

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They're blaming clots on covid and not the vax? A lot of money was wasted on respirators then when they were first trying to frighten us with this bs.

The word "legal sex" is so confusing? by KimiORabu in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is in the interests of people in the various law professions to make a legally binding imitation of everything under they guise of law, so that you and I can not really understand what words mean in court rooms or in documents submitted to courts. In an authoritarian system that uses the guise of law for its actions, what words mean in the rest of the world does not matter all, only what they mean in court.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What rule did I break?

why would you threaten to ban circling? Did they break the rules, or just piss you off?

Part of why you told me to stop was I was being repetitive, You're repeating yourself now over and over.

Also why keep this stupid back-and-forth going when you ain't budging and I ain't budging. You're wrong. You think you're not. You whine I'm bringing this BS to you when you're the one that first told me to stop. You aint' winning anywhere but in your head. I'm good to let it go, maybe you also want the last word. I really think you're wrong here and the more you try to justify your bullshit the more inconsistent you seem. Like I said: enjoy the cesspool.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't see how you think I should call out other mods when they seem perfectly fine with me calling out circling and you were the one telling me to leave circling alone about their rule breaking. You took it up with me, I did not seek address you with regard to circling's rule breaking until you wanted me to leave circling alone. The other mods are ignoring the whole shit-show maybe because they like cess pools.

Is circling's victim blaming against the rules or not? You said report posts, I did. The posts were still excusing the original victim blaming and rape apology. Just because circling performed that victim blaming and rape apology under the guise of responding AFTER you told circling to stop only means you've been duped.

I also think you miss the point about circling saying you'r unfit to be a mod BECAUSE of Cirlcing's rule breaking. I maintain that it already is an act of calling attention to the previous rape apology and victim blaming. Circling's actions on both counts are not separate from the original post about you, it is part of it. OF course circling would what to get away with breaking the rules while somehow saying you're unfit to mod, it's par for the course.

But bottom line is: circling broke the rules, you pretended it was "all you kids cut it out", and you protect circling. Circling should be banned. I reported some of Circling's posts breaking rules labeled them victim blaming.

You want to say "I'm the only one doing anything here" but what are you doing? Protecting a rape apologist and a victim blamer-- unless you can somehow say Circling isn't that but I see no repentance or change of heart or actual heart in Circling's posts in the matter. Circling remains a rape aplogist and victim blamer, and circling's recent posts claiming to be misconstrued is one (ridiculous) thing, but when Circling invites people to go back and look at the original posts that is reenacting the original offenses. What will happen when they go back and read them? The same offense that happened originally will happen each time someone reads the original posts, so how is that not repeating the offense?

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Who's acting like the martyr now? You're not being blamed for anything other than ignoring CMOV2's victim blaming and how those statements can all be rolled into other rule violations. You're the one telling me to leave CMOV2's transgressions alone, not the absentee mods. Should I go find them? No, they're not intervening.

You are the one who chose to both not ban the rape apologizing victim blamer and ask me to stop bringing it up to CMOV2. You also pretend to not see that as protecting CMOV2. It's a cesspool not a pool, COV2 is part of what makes it a cesspool and not pool.

@Covid19Crusher: "Strong results again from Melatonin, here in a randomized trial (n=158) with severe hospitalized Covid patients in Iraq." by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Now Melatonin works against Covid. So add that to: Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, N-acetyl cysteine, L-Lysine, Vit D, Zinc, gargling with diluted Ioddine solution and even Listerine and maybe H2O2, Everything except the vaccines works against covid. Amazing. Imagine if follow the science didn't mean the only thing politicians ever really follow: money.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can recast my posts and make assumptions about my motivation all you want, but bottom line is CMOV2 took every opportunity to talk about his/her/whatever/thems/its/Idon'tknowactually victim blaming and you can interpret that as not a viiolation of a rule. But why are you telling me to stop pointing it out? Is calling out victim blaming and rape apology and all the other rule violations CMOV2 committed in those actions against the rules? You could lock a topic if you don't like the discussion, but instead you want to protect CMOV2 from being reminded of what a POS CMOV2 is. Good luck keeping the cesspool muy cessy. Rationalize it all you want. you could have banned a monster for victim blaming you you'd rather pretend there is some other context that invalidates that reality.

Objectify meeeeeeeeeere by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The old visual joke that needed no words on Three's Company was how Mr Furley dressed as if that would be attractive to women. Dress like a clown, you get treated like a clown. Jacob would rather do performance art a la Andy Kaufman living the joke than be real.

Father Claims Daughter Was Sexually Assaulted by Male Student in Girls' Washroom at School by jet199 in SuperStraight

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The male women, isn't that what Bart Simpson used to say to the mail woman? We're living in a cartoon world.

Moderna: A Company “In Need Of A Hail Mary” by salvia_d in conspiracy

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As the moderator of the "Hail Mary" sub here on said it, I declare that corporations do not get a Hail Mary, especially Moderna. Besides, they probably knew they were going to be the patsy/scapegoat all along.

New California law will force retailers to have ‘gender neutral’ toy sections by NutterButterFlutter in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Someone will come up with spaying and neutering for kids and call it progressive.

New California law will force retailers to have ‘gender neutral’ toy sections by NutterButterFlutter in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So much for boys can play with dolls without calling them action figures and girls can play with carpentry tools or with a bat and glove for baseball/softball (and for any dad 15 feet away from a kid, a softball is a safety precaution not a sexist choice)

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

fair enough, I reported a number of examples of victim blaming. One might not appear to be that, but it is a call for people to go back and look at what was originally said to Catbug, which was victim blaming. So, that one by being a direct reference to the original incident is a repetition of the original incident.

If you think this is a question of unruly children needing a parent to separate them or send them all into time out, I think you are misreading. I think this is a case of one member trying to make this place unreasonable, the thread where all this occurs a case of that member making an accusation against you in spite of the common knowledge of what that member did and thus calling attention to it again. This is TRA tactics in a microcosm, make everything unbearable so that they are all that is left in any "public" spaces.

If repeated victim blaming is not bannable, or if you think that is not what is going on here, then ban me from the cesspool and I'll contemplate the differences between moderation and well reasoned enforcement of rules, a difference between civility and decency.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

YOU BROUGHT IT UP IN the very topic of this thread, "Meta: Moderation and the Rules", because what you did to CatBug/HousePlant made you the only person in the sub that I'm aware of who either told a rape victim they should have felt sympathy for their rapist or if we accept your not-less evil interpretation questioned her morality for breaking the rapist's nose. By doing that you broke the rules. By continuing to respond and rationalize your misdeeds as if they were philosophical discussions, instead of sticking your tail between your legs and hiding from ramifications of your own actions, you continue to break the no harassment rule, the no personal attack rule, the no misogyny rule, the no sexism rule, the no victim blaming rule, the rape apologia rule, and the trolling rule. You broke all those rules and you continue to mock a rape victim each time you continue to rationalize your behavior. That is far worse than anything you are accusing BiR about at the top if this thread. You knew that when you started this thread and you had to know your own misdeeds would be brought up.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ridiculous except for the part about circling continuing to discuss it and makes excuses for it and mischaracterize it every time circling says circling is not allowed to discuss it.

Also, I agree she made her decision. I suggested it I think once and not since. I mentioned it to you once previously. I'm not like browbeating her into changing her mind. She's capable of reassessing that decision whenever circumstances change. But, as you see she had already left once already (edited to add once already) because of inaction regarding cmov2/masks.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I made 1 suggestion to her. I'm discussing the nature of this cesspool with her. CMOV2 has continually said that cmov2 is forbidden to discuss the matter but then often in the same sentence continues to make excuses for inexcusable behavior. That seems like laughing at the rules to me. I think I need to point out that the problem is CMOV2's doubling down on inexcusable behavior which, along with queztelwhateverthemod'snameis' in action caused catbug to leave. It's almost like CMOV2's behavior is no different that the rest of the TRAs behavior, make everything so intolerable so that they are all that is left. If you want to assist CMOV2 in making this place intolerable, go right ahead. I think I suggested to you what you should do if I'm the problem here.

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

ban me, if I'm the problem here. you read what "catbug/houseplant" said, and you read what "masks/cmov2" has said. If I'm the problem, ban me. I don't want to be a member of a club that tolerates what cmov2 is doing. If I am not banned, I will not treat cmov2 any better than I am now. If what I'm doing is the problem ban me.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, it really is a microcosm of the whole GC thing. They misbehave, whine when called out on it, the authorities play 'both you kids cut it out', and decent people suffer while pigs enjoy shit and mud, decent people leave, and we have the internet (and increasingly life) from say 2015 onward.

We need to expand the definition of what a period is by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think if we expand the definition of what any word means, it loses utility to point accurately that which it points to. If we expand the meaning of period to anything monthly, bill paying becomes period. It's like the war on women starts with language maybe.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like this is a microcosm of the whole set of problems this sub is about, as well as all the GC subs. Were you banned as "Catbug"?

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You will never see your own hypocrisy because you are incapable of it. You are a lost cause. If they don't ban you, they should ban me. To paraphrase, and repurpose, the old Groucho Marx line: I wouldn't want to be a member of a club that would have you as a member.

Have you apologized yet, for lying about what you said and for what you said to catbug/houseplant? I already know the answer to the next question: did you mean it? No, of course not. You're not capable.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How many ways are you wrong here? As many as possible. But you know that. You get a kick out of being wrong.

Growing breasts is a thing adult human female bodies do, not "bodies" in general. Without the drugs growing the breasts, no transwoman will experience them growing at all. That's not a thing their bodies do.

Also, Did you ask the bottle? How do you know? We may have a case of Schrodinger's Artificial Breast. You'll have to open the bottle and pour out the contents to look under a microscope to see if any breasts are growing there. I imagine that would ruin the contents so you'd have to kill the tissue to find out if it is there in the bottle growing. I'm just using QT-type reasoning here where objective reality is subservient to perception.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you used to be "catbug" here, and you had the flair about how mods won't ban rape apologists, then I think you agree this monster should be banned. After reading the old link and seeing how unrepentant CMOV2 is, if that isn't bannable, then I should be banned because I don't think I can tolerate being civil with CMOV2. I used to feel sorry for CMOV2, who has quite a sob story and is clearly a very broken person. But, if the posts are genuine and just someone having a sick laugh, at some point the mal-adaptations have replaced whatever person was there.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Say the word, to Biology is Real, and this unrepentant monster will be banned.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But wait, is there a difference between "sexed organs" or differences between organs between the sexes, and sex organs? I think my kidneys thing, to set up my exercise in playwrighting, might still be valid.

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But that's not what you did, you questioned her morality. That's not a philosophical concept but an attack, on a rape victim. Own your shit, CMOV2. Life gets easier when you do. Excuses for the inexcusable does the opposite.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't know what I consider about anyone. If the bodies grew them, they'd grow them. The drugs grow them, the body is the plaything of the drugs in this case.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Enlightening as always! thanks, I did not know any of that. Smaller but greater capacity, and ... a lot of great info there. Thanks!

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As the saying goes, you were complaining about the splinter in someone else's eye while ignoring the timber in your own. We're just point out the timber, your hypocrisy about rules when you said absolutely horrible things to Houseplant and you remain not just unrepentant but defiantly so about it.

What is the moral duty that a rape victim has to her rapist after breaking the nose of the rapist in self defense? What was your action in raising this supposed duty with the victim? But, that's not what you did, it's more like you questioned her morality over it, which is a monstrous thing to do.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can they? How do they do that? And they are identical? Ohh, wait you said "with timely hormonal intervention". So, are the transwomen growing the breasts or is the "timely hormonal intervetion" doing it and the place the transwoman simply the place where that intervention occurs? The team of medical professionals and and the factory making the hormones that do the intervening seem to be the ones growing the "breasts".

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's almost like you are saying some babies would need to survive in order to grow up and make factories, and baby formula, and cans, and refrigeration, and can openers, and baby bottles, and rubber baby bottle nipples, and a way to sanitize it all. Those things have been around longer than any of us have been alive. Check mate, MT. I normal am impressed by your logic and sound reasoning, but I think I found the flaw in your reasoning today. Or, am I missing something?

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh! So YOU'RE THE LYING ABOUT WHAT YOU SAID!!!! no surprise. There is a huge difference between talking about someone's moral duty and calling them a moral failure. How are you not banned from being here? Oh, by the kindness of Houseplant for not asking for it. But you've yet to apologize? Just as well, you could not really mean any apology you'd give now. You've been beyond that for a while.

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, is that all you did: talk about the rape victim's moral duty to her rapist, and talk about that moral duty in absence of any reference to sympathy? thanks for clarifying that because without that clarification it sounds like you're no different of a monster than the very worst of men which you claim are all monsters. Is that all you did? But, with the clarification it really sounds no different. More like semantics if that. Moral duty without sympathy: got it!

What is that moral duty the rape victim has to the rapist? Were you pursuing a moral duty in informing the rape victim of her moral debt to that rapist, or were you being something less than moral? Care to talk more about that which you were specifically told not to talk about? And: have you apologized for it to the women you flung that poop at?

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Breasts are sex organs and breast development is part of the normal maturity in women, the adult human female of our species, and thus they are unique to one of the two and only two sexes of our species. The kidneys on the other hand is an organ common to all humans and thus it is not a sex organ at all. Neither factory made formula nor a dialysis machine make their function non-essential.

It is more like the following dramatization:

"whoa, I'm an infant and I ain't got no breast milk anywhere to be found."

"Whoa, what a coincidence infant! I'm an adult and I ain't got not functioning kindeys anywhere to be found."

"OK adult, what are those things over there" I'm a talking infant but I still can't see very far."

"Good eye, infant, in spite of not being able to see very far! Those are a big pile of infant formula cans on top of a dialysis machine!"

"We're saved! Both of us! Yeah"

"Yes! We are! The essential services we both need have been sufficiently imitated by technology."

"OK, where's the can opener and the electrical outlet for your machine?"

"Oh no, we're doomed!"

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yea you did, and you just violated the whole "I've been specifically told not to talk about it" thing by lying about what you did.

Geert Vanden Bossche: Keep asking the wrong questions and we’ll never tame this pandemic by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When have those in power every actually solved the problems they create for us? Never. We'll "tame the pandemic" when we admit it is endemic, our solutions will not come from the next vax or expensive drug, and the mosters who profit from it disease we suffer from.

QT: Why do you care so much if other people believe your chosen "identities"? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

have you apologized to the rape victim you mocked by expecting her to have sympathy for the rapist she broke the nose of? have you apologized to the forum for that act, as it was done here? have you no decency to offset your conceit?

When will this madness end? by ItsBondageTime in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

well, good luck with all that!

Australia's "Leaders" Admit Rules Don't Apply to Them. The leaders in Victoria have admitted that Members of Parliament and other politicians are not subject to the mandates because of "legal reasons". by Chipit in news

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it is refreshing to see a government finally admit the only legitimacy they have is the violence they use against their perennial adversary: the people they rule over.

For once a journalist asking a real question... by Noam_Chomsky in Coronavirus

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That lost look on his face as the question comes out would mean more to me if there were any consequences for the years not of lies and bullshit about this weak-ass virus they concocted in a lab with DOD money.

Anyone have a link to the Oxford study he mentions?

Ivermectin against Cancer by zyxzevn in Ivermectin

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, that's deep and given me a lot to think about. I want to go out and get me some horse-paste.

When will this madness end? by ItsBondageTime in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

a powerful group that values his/her interests

But his/her interests are the power of his/her progeny not theirs, or did I miss something. This powerful group that values his/her and not their own interests makes me think the term for this powerful group is either suckers or benevolent gods.

The idea that humans "evolved to be ethno-centric" seems at best a correlation but not causation: humans evolved, ethno-centrism exists. The later might simply reflect how for most of our history humans could only travel so fast around the world successfully, thus those who you are working with to survive are a similar group and thus the cultural concept we now call ethnicity may have developed.

As for the rest of what you typed: Oh, I get it. You're a racist. But I think you are mixing to very different approaches to life and society that do not really work together well-- maybe you just want to get others to work for your interests. I can not accept the first points you made about individuals and their own self-interests, and then also accept your points about some powerful group, and then that group being a homogeneous racial or ethnic group, looking out for the individuals self-interest. Your idea would lead to neighborhoods at war with each other, house to house, neighborhood by neighborhood. Such a group of people living in an area would be incredibly weak because they would be constantly injuring each other. They might also end up inbred.

I reject both of your world views, but I might not be seeking power for my progeny nor hoping some powerful group will somehow value my progeny over theirs while I would be (in your world view) also valuing my progeny over theirs. Better, I think, for a group to make allies with their neighbors regardless of who they are or what their ethnicity are-- because we have the reality of fast moving humans around the global making less homogeneous cities, towns and neighborhoods which would be stronger and healthier and happier if they were cooperating and not at war with each other. But, I'm into communitarianism and localism, not racism. I only have to think of the great contributions to the arts like music from literally every race and ethnic group on the planet to realize there is something of value, to me not to someone obsessed with the power of their progeny, in all ethno-cultural groups. But, what do I know, I'm also an anarchist who sees power as the problem and consensus as the solution.

QT/Trans: What do the language changes actually accomplish? by loveSloane in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think the fact that they were trying to change the definition was only revealed or discovered after all the charm of "it's science" and "lady-brain" and "well, they 'present as' therefore they are" wore off and the incel-to-transcel pipeline was noticed.

All Our Problems Are Built On Us-Vs-Them Propaganda. Keith Olbermann shared a video the other day where he ranted about people who don’t want to take the Covid vaccine with such emotional vitriol that spittle flew from his mouth and drool poured down his chin. by Chipit in OpinionPieces

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Projecting! He's lucky "important" people like him don't have to actually get the vaxxx (why three Xs? Because this whole thing is triple x obscene).

@RWMaloneMD: "Here, please have a healthy dose of propaganda to help you through your day. You are welcome. Signed- The Pharmaceutical Industry" by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://nitter.ir/Alan777774/status/1446902774650843138#m

I hope that is the right link. I think this person has stumbled into one of the motives for this all propaganda all the time thing: to eliminate the art of healing and the clinical, where the ailment is considered in the context of the unique person being treated as fully as possible, aspect of being a doctor and replace it with a technocratic version of "the science" of drugs. Health is not a consideration. Fears dictate drugs, eventually just vaccines, and the firing of health care workers to bring in potentially unvaxxed national guardsmen makes more sense too now.

All doctors going along to get along are getting along all the way to the unemployment line for their whole profession except ER doctors. Eventually there'll a big serving for dessert of schadenfreude for those who enjoy that.

When will this madness end? by ItsBondageTime in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why share that bit of info with me? I'm obviously laboring under some false assumptions which should put me at a disadvantage to you when we compete. You squander your time here, you are not accumulating power for your progeny here and falling behind your competitors.

The First Apparition of the Virgin Mary ever! Our Lady of the Pillar by FlippyKing in Hail_Mary

[–]FlippyKing[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The First apparition of Our Lady ocured before she was assumed into heaven.

You may say, "that's not fair! She obviously appeared to everyone around her back then. The local butcher did not experience an apparition when she when in about picked up a pork loin for dinner." You are right, that did not happen for two reasons. But, Our Lady of the Pillar is a bilocation event. It is a unique Marian apparition for that reason.

If I find a link to the cathedral/basilica's home page, I will place it the shrine's thread (and hopefully remember to then edit this comment to reflect that).

When will this madness end? by ItsBondageTime in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Each person or group should always act in his/her/its own interests.

I can't imagine what could go wrong with that plan. One benefit would be we could eliminate the phrases like "great good", "selfish" or "evil" from our vocabulary.

Dave Chappelle Is Right, Isn't He? by jet199 in SuperStraight

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yep.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Then you are ignoring the meaning of the word and what "GC" is critical of. In the GCdebatesQT sub, you are on team "uses fuzzy language that obfuscates the crux of the debate". The name of the sub should be changed to include your side in that debate.

Both: How would you define my sexual orientation? by theytookourjerbs in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

hmmmm ... Maybe next you'll tell us to question Ptolemaic Epicycles or to doubt the tried and true method of determining if someone is a witch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2xlQaimsGg

Both: How would you define my sexual orientation? by theytookourjerbs in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You are on a roll! Thanks!

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I edited what I think is the offending word. I have a serious question, if a member broke a rule or series of rules, is there a time limit on seeking action against them? I asked this a few days ago, but it more like directed up towards the ether and rhetorical. Is it too late to ask months after the event for:

banning of the only person in the sub that I'm aware of who told a rape victim they should have felt sympathy for their rapist because that seems to break the no harassment rule, the no personal attack rule, the no misogyny rule, the no sexism rule, the no victim blaming rule, the rape apologia rule, and the trolling rule. That's a lot but is particularly heinous. Is there a statute of limitations on behavior that heinous? I'm asking for a non-friend who maybe should be banned.

Both: How would you define my sexual orientation? by theytookourjerbs in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good old fashioned Lesbian, or the newly-coined "super"-lesbian would be my guess, but defining other's sexual orientation is a game for people with too much free time and too much nosiness. It's a sexual orientation, and yours seems to be having none of this gender stuff.

Patriot Boss Fires Vaxxed Employees To Get Below 100 Workers & Gives Unjabbed a Raise by JustLookDontDismiss in news

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think what the boss did here might end up being wise. If one of the vaxxed employees gets sick, the media will jump all over him and blame him for it and the government will use it as an excuse for totalitarianism.

Will BlackLivesMatter Fall Into the Elephant's Graveyard of Social Movements? It’s kind of astonishing, when you roll it around in your mind, what BlackLivesMatter meant in 2020 and no longer means in 2021. by Chipit in OpinionPieces

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not astonishing, the election is over. The concerns that started it might all still be there, but the media has no more use for BLMtm because they've moved on to a new group to hate: people who remember all the times drug companies lied about their findings and pushed risky and dead drugs on to people, and people who see just how much bullshit has gone into the manufacture of fear around a lab-created virus.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think any fuzziness in what I wrote is because Gender is bullshit and using it makes everything fuzzy. I'm OK with not using it at all.

Obviously the word has a meaning, their actions reveal as much, even if their words don't.

That's how it might appear to be, but it's not necessarily true. If the word had a clear meaning, that would stand on its own regardless of their actions. Their actions reveal something about themselves, not the language they use.

then even "transgender people with a gender identity that doesn't match their sex" needs to be changed to "transsexuals with a sex identity that doesn't match their sex". Please use '"sex" yourself first, consistently, before urging others to do so.

Well, at the end there you're just being disingenuous (edited in hopes of better reflecting the mod's sense of proper decorum). How can I be talking about what bullshit gender is as word if I do not use it? Should I have typed "that which we will not say" each time I typed "gender"? But you are making a straw man: My use of the term in talking about your use of the term does not mean I'm conferring any meaning, fuzzy or otherwise, to it. We could replace South Park's "Marklar" with gender, it would not mean Marklar has a clear meaning. Gender is not used, by anyone it seems, in such a way that it has a clear meaning, other than when they use it to mean some attribute they claim to have.

They are not transexuals unless they had surgery, so we are not talking about transexuals most of the time. They do call themselves transgender, most of "them" have not had surgery. What term would you use, or are you saying we should conflate transexuals who had surgery with those who LARP as the other sex?

Patriot Boss Fires Vaxxed Employees To Get Below 100 Workers & Gives Unjabbed a Raise by JustLookDontDismiss in news

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

brilliant! Small businesses are the heart of the economies, they all should get down below 100. Especially Pfizer. And the government, but somehow they exempted themselves-- classy.

QT/Trans: What do the language changes actually accomplish? by loveSloane in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All I can say to that video is: yes, that's it or that's the temptation sometimes.

The USA Today article on Dave Chappelle has an interesting slight of hand snuck into it by FlippyKing in lgbs

[–]FlippyKing[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Either T did not get the memo, or HRC via USA today is slipping that new order of the letters into the new normal-- pretty minor in light of the rest of the new normal which I think bodes well for their endeavor. I don't wish them luck though. They don't need it probably.

The USA Today article on Dave Chappelle has an interesting slight of hand snuck into it by FlippyKing in lgbs

[–]FlippyKing[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think such an explanation is needed to understand the point being made. But, you can google the phrase "pennant race" and gain that kind of enlightenment.

Dave Chapelle says he's 'Team TERF,' defends J.K. Rowling in new Netflix comedy special by jet199 in SuperStraight

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How can I answer? You're the one kind of annoyed: probe the depths of your feelings and figure it out.

Dave Chappelle is on team Terf! by FlippyKing in GenderCriticalGuys

[–]FlippyKing[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

his line about "terfs" being women who see transwomen the way blacks might see blackface is an example of truth in comedy. I think it's important to demand the right of women to acknowledge what they see and think, their reactions and the truth of things, be respected and defended. Even if someone thinks "twaw uwu", they have to acknowledge that it is 100% reasonable for a woman, anyone really, to see it like a form of blackface. Both can be true, just like you can like the clothes you are wearing and you can look like a clown to some people.

Dave Chapelle says he's 'Team TERF,' defends J.K. Rowling in new Netflix comedy special by jet199 in SuperStraight

[–]FlippyKing 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The line about they look at transwomen the way blacks might look at blackface, that sums it up perfectly.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think everyone errs when we push aside the word sex for gender. No one ever misgenders someone because they are not speaking of "gender", they are correctly sexing them or at least attempting to do that. Similarly a person who thinks their gender does not match their obvious and observable sex, that is sex dysphoria because the problem in their head is over their sex. Gender has no firm meaning, it means very different things both colloquially and when used among theorists or researchers. It is about as accurate a term as "the perfect world", what I see as a perfect world is not what anyone else means, and do I mean the geography/geology/atmosphere, or the social conditions? Or the flora and fauna? Gender has done no good to people or their ability to communicate. Please use "sex" when that is the accurate term and leave fuzzy meaningless language to those who need it to live fuzzy meaningless lives.

Disappointed in Vanessa Vokey by shinnygummy in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right? If ANYTHING shows how the minds of the masses are slapped around like ping-pong balls, this does. Like, what did the drug companies do? The boss comes in and says "bad news everyone, listen up! We have to scrap the bad Trump vaccine we were working on and start working on an whole new good one for Biden who has always been such a man of the people." And the drug companies are the good guys now? If this was a tv show, no one would watch-- that's why they make us live it instead.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Considering the side bar says both "this is not a safe space" and "some offense is expected", I can't imagine any legitimate complaints.

The only thing I wish I had thought about back when it happened is requesting the banning of the only person in the sub that I'm aware of who told a rape victim they should have felt sympathy for their rapest because that seems to break the no harassment rule, the no personal attack rule, the no musogyny rule, the no sexism rule, the no victim blaming rule, the rape apologia rule, and the trolling rule. That's a lot but is particularly heinous. Is there a statute of limitations on behavior that heinous? I'm asking for a non-friend who maybe should be banned.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you hate yourself, I'm just pointing that out to you. It is about you. It is always about you when you post.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you should be banned. You are a callous monster. And you know it.

You started this topic to bring more of your own truth-- that you care more about rapists than a woman raped, something no woman would do, but only the most sexist of men, your "monsters", the monster you are and can't get a way from-- upon your self. You know this topic, your lack of empathy and your callousness, would have be raised since you are complaining of something far less that what you've done. You really suck, CMOV2. Grow up.

I would say apologize to all rape victims you've showed such disdain for, but you have to feel remorse for it, and you will not be capable of it till you admit you are a monster and actually feel ashamed about it.

@Covid19Critical: "Jeffrey Smith, the 51-year-old father of 3 whose wife went to court to compel a Cincinnati hospital to give him IVM as a last resort, has died. FLCCC physician Dr. Fred Wagshul prescribed the IVM for Smith, which he received for 13 days until the court order was rescinded." by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A reply to someone who asked the same question I asked: "Likely started too late. ... If the hospital had not delayed to fight the family, the man would likely be alive. "

@Covid19Critical: "Jeffrey Smith, the 51-year-old father of 3 whose wife went to court to compel a Cincinnati hospital to give him IVM as a last resort, has died. FLCCC physician Dr. Fred Wagshul prescribed the IVM for Smith, which he received for 13 days until the court order was rescinded." by Maniak in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is he the first of the people who needed a court order to get Ivermectin to die? (edited to add most of what follows) Others bounced back to health quickly. 13 days should have shown improvement unless he had very bad comorbidities. I suspect foul play here, besides the foul play of rescinding the order to allow Ivermectin.

Mary's messages and warnings for today by FlippyKing in Hail_Mary

[–]FlippyKing[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm adding The Divine Child of the Cross of Pichincha as a reply to Quinto because He is part of that apparition:

https://www.ourladyofgoodsuccess.com/blogs/news/the-divine-child-of-the-cross

Prayers that have come via Marian apparitions by FlippyKing in Hail_Mary

[–]FlippyKing[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These Prayers are associated with the Quito apparition, which I want to call Our Lady of the Good Event of the Purification (which I understand to be a better translation than "Good Success")

https://www.ourladyofgoodsuccess.com/pages/prayer-to-the-archangels

The context for them and the singing at the end is quite inspiring.

Prayer to St. Gabriel

Dear St. Gabriel, celestial ambassador of the Incarnation of the Divine Word, illuminate my intelligence so that I may know and understand the truths of our Catholic Faith. Erase all of my doubts that I might have in regards to God’s mercy and justice. Through the intercession of Our Lady of Good Success and Mother Mariana, please grant my request. Amen

St Gabriel pray for us!

Prayer to St. Michael

Dear St. Michael, celestial defender of the Faith, strengthen my weak heart and expand it that it might receive the abundance of divine grace. Secure in me the virtue of humility; help me to realize my unworthiness and ignorance so that I may be freed from any danger from the proud evil spirits who disobeying God hurled themselves from Heaven into the deep abyss. Through the intercession of Our Lady of Good Success and Mother Mariana please grant this request. Amen

St Michael pray for us!

Prayer to St. Raphael

Dear St. Raphael, celestial messenger from Heaven and remedy of Divine Love, cure my blindness of the mind so that I may believe in the Way, the Truth and the Life. Illuminate my mind and heart so that I may realize that in all of the sufferings and crosses that I may endure in this life, I receive graces and favors as Our Lord wishes to give me so that He may lead me on the pathway to Heaven. Through the intercession of Our Lady of Good Success and Mother Mariana, please grant this request. Amen

St Raphael pray for us!

Prayer to the Archangels Holy Princes and faithful messengers of the Sovereigns of Heaven, I thank thee for the lights with which thou hast illuminated my understanding and strengthened by heart and dissipated the blindness of my eyes. I, who am the least of all of the creatures that exist upon the earth, praise the Lord for all of the marvelous things He has done in me.

Dear Archangels, I, who am deserving of nothing, beseech thee, go now to Our Lord and Our Lady of Good Success and intercede for me, as this poor servant desires to prostrate himself before Them and submit to whatever they desire. As my heart and my entire being belongs to Them, may I, like a small drop of dew, lose myself in the immensity of the Divine Being. Amen.

Prayer to Our Lady of Good Success of Candlemas Day Our Lady of Good Success, Queen of Angels, sustain us in these ill-fated times of the Church. Grant us the perseverance in order to practice virtue only acquired by the wound of the relentless battle we fight under the most holy gaze of God.

Dear Mother, we implore you to give us the valor and strength needed so that we may not waiver in our faith nor forsake our vocation in this life. Grant that our tears which we shed in this life be gathered up by the Holy Angels and presented before the throne of God assuming an immense valor as they are united to the sufferings and tears of our dear Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen.

Hail Most Holy Daughter of God the Father, pray for us. Hail Most Holy Mother of God the Son, pray for us. Hail Most Pure Spouse of the Holy Ghost, pray for us. Hail Most Holy Temple and Sacrarium of the Most Holy Trinity, pray for us.

Prayer to St. Francis of Assisi St Francis of Assisi, Seraphic Father who assists all souls who invoke you, intercede for me in these difficult times of spiritual hunger and emptiness. Pray to Our Lady of Good Success so that I may increase in virtue, bless and support me so that I may finally be found worthy to enter into Eternal Happiness. Amen

Salve Sancta Parens Hail, holy Mother, thou who didst bring forth the King who rules heaven and earth for ever and ever. My heart hath uttered a good word: I speak my works to the King. v. Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.

Magnificat

My soul doth magnify the Lord, and my Spirit hath rejoiced in God my Savior. Because He hath regarded the humility of His handmaid; for behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. For He that is mighty has done great things to me; and holy is His Name. And His mercy is from generation to generations, to them that fear Him. He hath showed might in His arm; He hath scattered the proud in the conceit of their heart. He hath put down the mighty from their seat, and hath exalted the humble. He hath filled the hungry with good things and the rich he hath sent empty away. He hath received Israel His servant, being mindful of His mercy, As He spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his seed forever. Amen.

In addition to these prayers, Our Lady here showed Mariana the Divine Child of the Cross of Pichincha, which are mountains there. More about that aspect of the Apparition will be in that thread. I think I remember seeing a Novena to the Divine Child of the Cross of Pichincha, but I can't find it. Here are the words He said, a short Prayer, and some information. https://www.ourladyofgoodsuccess.com/pages/prayer-to-the-child-of-pichincha

"Divine Child of the Cross of Pichincha: have mercy on us." is a simple prayer, could be part of a Litany and could be used in the Jesus Prayer or in the Decade Prayer or the Pardon Prayer I imagine.

FBI raids New York City police union headquarters by magnora7 in news

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The dems have been anti-Union since the 90s, and before that they only tolerated Unions in the North in heavily unionized working class districts. Trump just picked up the crumbs left over from 20 years earlier.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you expected a rape victim to have sympathy for her rapist when she broke the rapist's nose. You are a monster and you have no right to complain about what anyone says to you here.

Biden’s Lawless Vaccine Mandate by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

wow, thanks for such an excellent and thoughtful response! I will check out the Rich Man's Trick. The rest seems very reasonable. thanks!

Biden’s Lawless Vaccine Mandate by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe so, but I feel like that just discounts the obvious nefariousness of it all.

Biden’s Lawless Vaccine Mandate by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Those who "jet set" have not been hindered one bit by any of this. It's just pure authoritarianism.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are asking CMOV2 to stop projecting, that would require reflecting or self-reflection. CMOV2 is obviously very immature and needs help.

I am not diagreeing with you, but we have to take all of CMOV2's comments here in their context together. CMOV2 did tell you (I add in an edit after now realizing), a rape victim here, to be sympathetic to her rapist. There's really no decency or empathy in CMOV2. That makes CMOV2 a monster. CMOV2 calls men monsters, but obviously feels disdain for women also, because the problems are within CMOV2 and not outside.

I would love CMOV2 to stop projecting on to men all the self-loathing CMOV2 feels, but telling someone to stop something is not as good as telling them what to do. CMOV2 has to grow up and take responsibility for each projection onto others and for how CMOV2's self-loathing is not dealt with at all by transitioning but just transformed into a lack of empathy for others.

Meta: Moderation and the rules by circlingmyownvoid2 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

your sympathy for rapists and not for rape victims is all I need to know about your position on what is dehumanizing and how rules should be enforced. You said to me often that men are monsters, but here you are OBVIOUSLY the monster. Do the math, admitting the truth is the first step. You, CMOV2, are a monster. Accept it and change, for your own good let alone the good of everyone around you.

I'm having a hard time finding a particular song by AmericanMuskrat in AskSaidIt

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe it's your own and you need to finish writing it.

Biden’s Lawless Vaccine Mandate by penelopepnortney in WayOfTheBern

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

His justification is a lack of patience. Patience is a virtue. Biden was never really a man of virtue though, was he?

Prayers that have come via Marian apparitions by FlippyKing in Hail_Mary

[–]FlippyKing[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The prayers associated with Fatima include those given to Lucia when she was an adult and a nun along with those given to her and Jacinta (and Fransisco, but he could never hear Our Lady, well their Lady at the time I guess). They, and good context for them, are here:

https://slife.org/fatima-prayers/

The seven prayers are:

The Decade Prayer (said after each decade of the Rosary, but say it when ever you want. I say it along with the Orthodox's Jesus Prayer along with some others when preparing for (and after) the Eucharist) "O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell; lead all souls to Heaven, especially those most in need."

The Pardon Prayer (often said three times as the Children were asked to repeat it three times) "My God, I believe, I adore, I hope and I love Thee! I ask pardon for those who do not believe, do not adore, do not hope and do not love Thee!"

Angel's Prayer: "O Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, I adore Thee profoundly. I offer Thee the most precious Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ, present in all the tabernacles of the world, in reparation for the outrages, sacrileges and indifference by which He is offended. By the infinite merits of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I beg the conversion of poor sinners."

The Offering Prayer (I think I've seen this called The Sacrifice Prayer): "O My Jesus, it is for love of Thee, for the conversion of sinners, and in reparation for the sins committed against the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I offer this sacrifice to Thee."

The Trinitarian Prayer (I think I've seen this called The Eucharistic Prayer) "O Most Holy Trinity, I adore Thee; My God, My God, I love Thee in the Most Blessed Sacrament!"

The Salvation Prayer: "Sweet Heart of Mary, be the salvation of Russia, Spain, Portugal, Europe and the whole world."

The Conversion Prayer: "By Thy pure and Immaculate Conception, O Mary, obtain for me the conversion of Russia, Spain, Portugal, Europe and the whole world."

Other links for them (and others on one) are:

https://www.fatimacentennial.com/fatima-prayers

and

https://fatima.org/about/fatima-the-message/the-five-first-saturdays/

this link was given already in regard to the First Five Saturdays devotion, but if you scroll down you'll see the prayers and their suggestion for use.

Hello, I am Hispanic, ‘Latinx’ is a stupid word and you need to stop using it by Chipit in OpinionPieces

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I say latin and then insist the x is silent. More stupid things should be just as silent.