you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlippyKing 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Do you understand the difference between definite and indefinite? I can affirm that I am definitely male. If someone is easily affirmed as definitely female then we KNOW they are definitely not male.

But if you were to ignore that classification as ruling out them being male, and tried to classify them as male and not consider if they are female, then you would conclude that you could not define them as male. You'd say the female is not male.

But you skip past this as it is not your concern. You are not concerned with seeing clearly defined aspects of the world and creating and using definitions based on those. Instead you go to the margins and ask about people with non-functioning gonades. If their body is designed to produce small mobile gamates, they are male. If their body does or does not work properly is irrelevant. If their body is designed to produce large immoble gamates, they are female. If their body does or does not work properly is irrelevant.

What you're doing is finding red herrings or non sequiturs. You are not offering a functional system to define or classify things, you are instead pretending such can not exist, which leaves it and all things to be declared by those with the most power. For a movement that cries about being oppressed, trans activists want only their power over women to define their femaleness, they want doctors empowered by the money from surgeries to define it, and they want laws to prevent reality to matter in society. Men who identify as women are a toxic mimic of women, and trans activists are a toxic mimic of oppression. Yours are a toxic mimic of questions, citing a toxic mimic of scholarly inquiry. Your goal, be it consciously yours or not, is to eliminate male and female, parents and parental responsibilities. The goal is to replace it with laws and schools and governments and surgeries, making everyone slaves, slaves to mental illnesses, slaves to willful or trained in stupidity (as schools are doing now teaching this gender bullshit to kids), slaves to dysfunctional sexual drives, slaves to the medical professions, and the elimination of family bonds because slaves only have time to work or suffer or die. But, welcome back, troll.

[–]KimiORabu[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

... parents and parental responsibilities

... slaves to dysfunctional sexual drives and elimination of family bonds

You sound like a conservative Christian not going to lie

I can't take conservatives seriously. GC and conservativism are at odds with each other. Conservatives want to be able to define women so that women can be "slaves" to traditional family and "gender" roles. GC want to be able to define women so that women can be free of traditional family and "gender" roles

But, welcome back, troll

Huh! Anyone asking a question is a troll. Gotcha

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't take you seriously, so we're even. You would rather find an ad hominem and fallaciously use that to not "take someone seriously" but I do not take you seriously because you can not be serious. In another comment you say how you're not going to read an essay someone wrote as a comment, but you don't believe the stat they cite (edited for spelling) and you claim that even if someone claims to be heterosexual you do not believe them. Elsewhere you deny reality and you think everything is subjective. So, you're going to believe what ever bullshit is convenient for you and reality be damned. I pointed out the end goal of all this gender bullshit and I said that you may not be aware of that goal, but it is the goal regardless. But if you don't believe in objective reality and think everything is subjective, you're already on board with all that. Subjectivism means everything comes down to power and not reason.

And I welcomed you back as the troll you are because I saw your previous contributions, and you're a troll. You spew bullshit, tell people you won't read and deny everything because ultimately you adhere to subjectivism. But if a troll admits they're a troll it kinda ends the game. Play on, playa.