Dear god what bizarre thought processes! by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]Moutonelectrique 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm too old, man.

A: "I don't like how you type"

B: "YOU DON'T SEE ME AS A REAL MAN"

Edit: wait, how old are these people?

Bill Maher Attacking Gender Cult by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I caught that. I disagree that anyone is 'born trans'

Bill Maher Attacking Gender Cult by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

at the end though: trans is not innate, it's bullshit. It's way past time people stop saying otherwise.

Bill Maher Attacking Gender Cult by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

interesting the url has "cancel" but the headline has "'un-cancel'"

It's shockingly accurate by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's almost like protecting mental lllness, or just protecting a douche-bag's douche-baggery, is not good for anyone. I love that their relationship started when she was 16 and he was 34, almost like she was his mid-life crisis rescue and his unleashed fetish is his old-age crisis. It's not fiction, it's compilation.

It looks like society's immune system is developing resistance and immunity to the trans social contagion.

There’s nothing right-wing about gender critical views by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]Finnegan7921 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The reason they say that it is "right wing" is b/c slapping that label on anything marks it as inherently evil and bigoted, and such a view can only be held by people unfit for enlightened society.

There’s nothing right-wing about gender critical views by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]pcpmasterrace 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed, there’s a good case to be made that the origins of British resistance to trans rights orthodoxy are actually on the left of politics.

WPUK is apolitical but was founded by women with deep roots in the trade union movement

Which brings us to the argument that capitalism is itself a left-wing (i.e. entropic) force.

This is progress? r/gaytransguys - Just want a normal cock by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]Finnegan7921 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

one reply in and I'm already confused. Allosexual ? Allosaurus I've heard of but allosexual ? Nope.

Bill Maher Attacking Gender Cult by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I believe the change in tune is directly related to the fact that the merger deal involving the parent company which owns HBO was completed last month (April) - and new management has been installed at the top of the new firm that's been created, Warner Bros Discovery. The content officer of HBO, Casey Bloys, is to remain in place for the time being, but now he reports to a new boss, Discovery CEO David Zaslav. Zaslav is openly "anti-woke."

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/warner-bros-discovery-top-boss-announces-new-leadership-team-2022-04-07/

One of the first things Zaslav has done in the few weeks he's been at the helm of the new entertainment behemoth Warner Bros Discovery is announce that he's set up a face-to-face meeting with JK Rowling in hopes of convincing her to make content for HBO Max.

He now plans to sit down with Rowling to discuss new Harry Potter-related content for his HBO Max streamer.

That comes despite Rowling facing mounting criticism over her view on transgender people, with HBO Max 'canceling' her from a Harry Potter reunion special it broadcast on New Year's Day.

Any rapprochement with the billionaire British author is likely to infuriate progressive staff at HBO Max, but Zaslav seems unlikely to bow to woke pressure.

Zaslav seems to want to keep HBO Max profitable while remaking its parent company in his image.

On Wednesday, Zaslav took to CNBC to share some of his colleague Chris Licht's plans for CNN, another one of his new properties.

Zaslav appeared to confirm the network would move away from opinion-focused primetime shows, and instead return to its roots as a breaking news broadcaster with an extremely strong reputation for covering big stories.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10833471/WarnerDiscoverys-anti-woke-new-CEO-David-Zaslav-plans-cancel-JK-Rowling.html

I'm hoping this means we can look forward to hearing more from Bill Maher about gender madness. Since he's a foe of all religions - as well as authoritarianism and "political correctness" of all kinds - taking aim at the Church of Genderology should be right up his alley. Also, he's always been on point when it comes to calling out the ridiculous excesses and histrionics of the so-called left.

It's shockingly accurate by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]Moutonelectrique 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Schrödinger's trans cock. 😂 I currently sound like a hyena. Most posts on there are exactly like this parodie.

That is one of the saddest subreddits out there. I remember one woman being hit with a dilator because her TiM was angry or sad for some reason.

Bill Maher Attacking Gender Cult by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not even an 'attack'. He's just pointing out that we need to be able to talk about this shit. You can tell his team researched this segment extensively - moreso than his usual monologues which are just jokes and opinions. They were anticipating pushback. There was a time when Bill wouldn't touch this stuff and I thought he couldn't, being on HBO. Very heartening to see that changing.

Woman inherits a title through a legal loophole by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Y'see, as an American, I didn't know any of this. I was only aware that Britain is stuffy and old-fashioned and has dumb laws.

Woman inherits a title through a legal loophole by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd be willing to bet that this particular convention has stuck around from more rigidly gender-role-dependent times not because of any particular malice towards women in modern Britain but because the country as a whole can't stand changing their quite-literally-medieval legal codes.

If that's how you'd bet, you'd lose your money.

There have been innumerable changes to UK legal codes since the medieval era, including many reforms whose purpose has been to address, bolster and roll back various forms of male-only privilege, such as primogeniture and laws that historically restricted a host of rights solely to males - such as the right to own property, the right to keep one's own wages, the right to be paid fair wages at the same rate as others doing the same exact job, the right to inherit from your spouse, the right to have a bank account and bank services, and right to be served in a pub (which was only extended to women unaccompanied by men in the UK in 1982).

In the course of the 19th and 20th centuries, numerous changes have been also been made regarding how Parliament and the monarchy operate that specifically deal with male primogeniture and male privilege.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Married_Women%27s_Property_Act_1870

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Married_Women%27s_Property_Act_1882

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Property_Act_1925

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Pay_Act_1970#:~:text=The%20Equal%20Pay%20Act%201970,1963%20of%20the%20United%20States.

https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/legislation/historical-and-legislative-background/

https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/electionsvoting/womenvote/keydates/

nt.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/electionsvoting/womenvote/overview/thevote/

https://www.stylist.co.uk/visible-women/law-lawyer-feminism-today-history-gender-pay-gap-abortion-equality/188525#:~:text=1982%20Women%20can't%20be,Gill%20and%20journalist%20Anna%20Coote.

https://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/lords-history/lords-reform/

https://www.britannica.com/event/Reform-Bill

https://www.britannica.com/event/Parliament-Act-of-1911

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords_Act_1999

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_to_the_Crown_Act_2013

When the UK's Gender Recognition Act of 2004 was in the process of being written and discussed in Parliament, there was considerable focus on the importance of not letting the new law remove or diminish male primogeniture and other forms of legally-enforced male privilege then still enshrined in UK law (keeping the Masons male-only, for example). You can read the debates in Hansard.

The GRA of 2004 as it was made into UK law explicitly says that when males receive a Gender Recognition Certificate and change their legal sex to female, they still will retain the all rights to inherit titles and property, and to serve in positions, that by UK law and longstanding custom are reserved only for males. At the same time, the GRA explicitly says that when females obtain a GRC and change their legal sex to male, they cannot and will not be considered male for the purpose of inheriting titles and estates, and for obtaining any other male-only rights and privileges that in the UK it's permissible to exclude females from, such as the right to seek membership in the Masons, to join the RC priesthood, to become a Muslim imam, and to attend Eton, Harrow or Radley.

Britain on the whole is allergic to changing oldass laws on anything

That claim is utter rubbish. If you took the time on occasion to crack a history book or two, watch some historical documentaries, or enjoy theatrical-release movies about truel-life events in the UK such as "A Man For All Seasons," "Amazing Grace," "Suffragette," "In The Name of The Father," "10 Rillington Place," "Made In Dagenham" etc, you'd get a sense of just how wrong that wholly unsubstantiated assertion of yours is.

https://www.oxford-royale.com/articles/laws-changed-britain-forever/

https://www.lawabsolute.com/recruitment-news/article/biggest-changes-in-the-law-in-the-past-decade/

Woman inherits a title through a legal loophole by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow. So oppressed.

Woman inherits a title through a legal loophole by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sort of. That is surely the ultimate origin, but it's more complicated than that. Britain on the whole is allergic to changing oldass laws on anything even if they haven't made sense in centuries. Remember, we are talking about a country in which there's a city that still pays rent to the Queen in horseshoes and knives, judges are required by law to wear white horsehair wigs in court, and there are still laws on the books barring the wearing of knight's armor in certain government buildings. They're averse to changing literally anything. I'd be willing to bet that this particular convention has stuck around from more rigidly gender-role-dependent times not because of any particular malice towards women in modern Britain but because the country as a whole can't stand changing their quite-literally-medieval legal codes.

Woman inherits a title through a legal loophole by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]sneeuweekhoorn 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Legal loophole known as male privilege.

This is so disturbing. They're always pushing boundaries. ANY boundary that exists between real women and "trans" women must be brought down. by bolla_top in GenderCritical

[–]Jong56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gross. Not just that it's a dude breatsfeeding but that he feels the need to broadcast his fetish for the whole world

An idiot at large by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That whole subreddit is a mindfuck. People at war with themselves and reality.

ACLU Claims “Males, Females” Do Not Exist in Court Docs by NoMorePatriarchy in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I look forward to Wolf's response because if the court rules reasonably and not cowardly the legal fiction of gender as a trait absent of sex might end. At the very least the sex-denialism would end and then you'd have the fake trait of gender stand along side the real trait of sex at least for a time. If so the fight over what pronouns refer to and what "identity" is might have to be had. Identity in some way must at least refer to how some outside party can determine if a given physical person matches the documents naming them and that has matching physically observable traits like eye color, skin color, sex and age. The idea of "Identity" being some inner trait seems odd because you already know who you are and never needed words or social categories or outside validation to realize you are you. It's just stupid.

Am I misreading? I’m leery about the Women’s Bill of Rights Resolution, as introduced. by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The issues with the phrasing you point out could easily be corrected, though. I personally think the phrasing in the removed section is poorly worded - it's imprecise and awkward. It's also asymmetrical in the way it names the female gametes, but doesn't name the male ones, which is not a good look in this kind of resolution. If I'd been consulted, I would have heavily revised that section.

Instead of

For purposes of state/federal law, a ‘female’ is an individual whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova; a ‘male’ is an individual whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female;

I would say something like:

For purposes of state/federal law, a ‘female’ is a human being who during gestation in utero developed gonads, or a single gonad or functional gonadal tissue, whose role in reproduction is the generation of gametes known as ova; a ‘male’ is a human being who during gestation in utero developed gonads, or a single gonad, or functional gonadal tissue, whose role in reproduction is the generation of sperm;

Wording like this would put the focus on the gonads, the organs where gametes are generated and immature gamete precursor cells reside, rather than on the "biological reproductive system" - a vague and clunky term if there ever was one. IMO, use of the term "biological reproductive system" here is "problematic" because the reality is that only the gonads generate ova or sperm. All the other parts of the male and female reproductive systems perform functions that are separate and additional to the making of gametes.

My wording establishes that the defining criteria of sex is the kind of gonad, or gonadal tissue, each individual developed during gestation in utero, ovaries or testes - not whether someone still has the gonads (or gonad or gonadal tissue) they were born with all through life. My wording also covers those born with a single gonad, or with two gonads but with a disorder leading to gonadal dysgenesis and/or dysfunction in one or both. And it allows for the differences in the ways that female and male gametes are generated, and the different stages of human development when the processes involved in the making and maturation of male and female human gametes take place.

My wording further insures that everyone can still easily be classed as either female or male even if they are currently pre-pubertal kids too young to be generating gametes from the gonads they were born with, or they are or post-menopausal women past the phase in life when gamete generation is possible in human females. It also covers all the cases of people who developed gonads, or gonadal tissue, during gestation in utero that never could perform, or never had the potential to perform, the function of gamete generation in the first place due to genetic medical conditions like DSDs; early in life medical interventions like chemotherapy, X-rays and gonadectomy; and other reasons such as environmental damage and exposure to drugs like DES during development.

Finally, focusing exclusively on gonads, and zeroing in on one single job that gonads do - "whose role in reproduction is the generation of gametes" - makes the defining criteria of human sex completely separate from other issues that are frequently dragged in, such as sex hormone levels now and other times, atypical sex chromosomes, misplaced SRY genes, malformations or problems with other parts of the male and female reproductive tracts and urogenital anatomy, how well a person's androgen and estrogen receptors work or don't work, individuals' outward phenotype and appearance, and which if any secondary sex characteristics individuals developed - and how pronounced those characteristics are.

This definition also removes the possibility of parents, doctors and gender ideologues insisting that when children on the cusp of adolescence are put on "puberty blockers" followed by high doses of Big Pharma sex hormones of the sort dominant in the opposite sex, these children for all intents and purposes cease being their actual sex and turn into the other sex. Because what makes a person male or female is the gonads we developed whilst we were still in our mother's wombs - and there is no way to go back and redo our prenatal gestation.

Am I misreading? I’m leery about the Women’s Bill of Rights Resolution, as introduced. by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a proposed resolution that has been introduced in Congress. It hasn't been voted on. Dunno if it will ever be voted on. But like legislation and court decisions, resolutions that many parties are involved in - and many more parties are asked to sign and/or support - usually go through many drafts and changes as different parties put in their proverbial two cents.

I suggest you write to the legislators who introduced the resolution, and the organizations other than WoLF who are behind it, and ask why they omitted that part and spell out why you object. But first please see and consider my other comment on this thread pointing out some of the problems with the phrasing of the passage that's been removed.

Am I misreading? I’m leery about the Women’s Bill of Rights Resolution, as introduced. by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just popped back to add this

When she called the clinic from home after the surgery, the nurse asked her if she was a TIM who had an ovary implant. I don't know if Leo is flat out lying, here. But if she's not, either the nurse really is that stupid and working in a clinic, or they're already experimenting.

https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/93725/a-sad-surreal-reflection-on-a-tif-s-hysterectomy-trans-rite-the-complication-con

Sigh. The powers that be are truly determined to erase women. Not even the definition I cited above would may be adequate without something like “originally” or “chromosome instructed”.

Fifty years ago, we thought the word woman was clear enough, too…

Am I misreading? I’m leery about the Women’s Bill of Rights Resolution, as introduced. by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think I prefer the exclusion. Biological sex at birth is clear enough. Granted, I assume it will not be possible for medical science to legitimately change people's sexual functions to this extent, but I am wary of tying the definition of sex to a particular biological function. All we need is some new medical innovations for TRAs to claim that they meet the reproductive system definition. They already try to claim that TiMs can menstruate and breastfeed. I would not put it past them to claim that technology enables them to produce ova.

This is so disturbing. They're always pushing boundaries. ANY boundary that exists between real women and "trans" women must be brought down. by bolla_top in GenderCritical

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're postmodernists. They legitimately believes that changing words and appearance will change fundamental base reality.

Am I misreading? I’m leery about the Women’s Bill of Rights Resolution, as introduced. by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are the Repubs Idiots or Rats?

Career politicians in general are idiots. They're pretty much all morons, and they run the government, may the Lord have mercy on us all.

(WARNING: SA, lesbophobia!) IMPORTANT! There is a reddit group about abusing lesbians being ran a transwoman and men! Please help report this group! Link in description to report it. by jay-day in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And you just know that r/AgainstHateSubreddits would have absolutely nothing to say about this either

(WARNING: SA, lesbophobia!) IMPORTANT! There is a reddit group about abusing lesbians being ran a transwoman and men! Please help report this group! Link in description to report it. by jay-day in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus Christ, the one is even a women-attracted trans man (read: self-hating lesbian) herself. Utterly deranged. The TIM, on the other hand, you at least have come to expect this from.

(WARNING: SA, lesbophobia!) IMPORTANT! There is a reddit group about abusing lesbians being ran a transwoman and men! Please help report this group! Link in description to report it. by jay-day in GenderCritical

[–]jay-day[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because the group is led by two trans people, paradoxes abound. I'm not even kidding when I say they advertise themselves as a pro-lesbian sub.

(WARNING: SA, lesbophobia!) IMPORTANT! There is a reddit group about abusing lesbians being ran a transwoman and men! Please help report this group! Link in description to report it. by jay-day in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lesbophobic hate speech will get you banned

There are no words.

Many Afghan women pushing back against Taliban orders to cover up by eng in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Say what you will about the (objectively regressive) Taliban, or Russia for that matter, but they do not seem to have the problem of “trans children” in their society. We are hurling toward last place at record speeds.

ACLU Claims “Males, Females” Do Not Exist in Court Docs by NoMorePatriarchy in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I, for one, have long ago stopped caring about being labeled “hateful” by these people - I’ve seen what makes them cheer.

ACLU Claims “Males, Females” Do Not Exist in Court Docs by NoMorePatriarchy in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Transgender Respect Agency Dignity Act

TRA Dignity does not exist

It's almost as though transwomen are men and transmen are women by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gross, gross reduction of people to their parts but yet it’s “muh bioessentialism” that’s bad

Stereotypically female desire for compliments by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the worst of what I’d imagine an insecure, needy girlfriend to be like in a straight relationship (of which of course this is). You shouldn’t need your man’s constant stream of validation to be secure in who you are…

It's not a fetish, no no no! by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Finnegan7921 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yikes on bikes. Not only is it a fetish, but these guys get excited over dressing like 15 year old girls. Tell me again it isn't about the kids.

Stereotypically female desire for compliments by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]Chocolatepudding[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Woah that's incredibly callous by the cousin

Stereotypically female desire for compliments by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I love him a lot and now that I’m finished with this semester of grad school we’re going to be visiting together for a few weeks.

We get along really well and I’m excited to hang out with him.

These comments suggested that she is in a long distance relationship. Checking other posts confirms:

I get crushes very infrequently and I was definitely not ready to mentally maintain a relationship until recently, when I did start dating my LDR boyfriend. (Still haven’t kissed, obvs)

So this person spends a lot of trying playing computer games online, which is where she presumably 'met' her boyfriend. She is in a long distance relationship with their boyfriend, who she has been dating for 3 months.

Many comments about transgender people playing computer games using opposite sex avatars. Comments about xenogenders being a valid way for non-binary people to express their personality. Comments bemoaning dysphoria despite not making any kind of cosmetic 'transition' (e.g. still has long hair), let alone medical transition (no hormones) - this is apparently due to her Catholic family not accepting transgenderism. However, she is "out" as transgender to her work colleagues - which pretty much amounts to telling them she is a transgender man and uses the pronouns he/him.

Also comments in posts about 'healthy relationships'.

These people are not living in the real world. They are deluded. They are so immersed in computer games.

It reminds me of this woman who believed that she was in a relationship with a man who she never met for 10 years - it was actually her female cousin pranking her.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10362619/Woman-duped-DECADE-female-cousin-says-catfishing-criminal-offence.html

I am very sympathetic towards people suffering from mental illness, but they need a reality check. There are people with mental illness who acknowledge they have mental illness, people with mental illness who deny that they have mental illness, and then there is the scenario where society does not recognise certain behaviour and ways of thinking as mental illness.

How can you be in a relationship with someone you have never met? Relationships need to be grounded in reality, surely?

Stereotypically female desire for compliments by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If/when this insufferable narcissist's poor BF starts giving her the compliments she wants worded exactly as she insists, you can bet she'll immediately start complaining that he's not using the right tone of voice and that he doesn't seem sincere.

No, not like that. Say it like you really mean it. Put some oomph in it. Use some emotional elbow grease. Show some enthusiasm. Make me believe you.

Afghanistan: The secret girls school defying the Taliban by redgreenblue in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Wonder how the Taliban identifiés which people to target for these bans?

Stereotypically female desire for compliments by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the outrageous level of narcissistic entitlement that using pronouns just to be nice leads to. The object of the compliment does not get to dictate what kind of compliments others give. They are trying to control, not just the language people use (which is bad enough), but the very way people perceive the world around them. The sooner these people learn that no one gets to control how others experience the world, the happier they will be. So much of their frustration is borne of the unreasonable expectation that they have the power to micromanage other people’s realities.

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I get that on a mass level, but it is hard for me to see how any individual with a couple of brain cells can buy that saying, "Let's stop and think about whether there may be any less severe option besides permanently mutilating a young person" is an expression of hate. How can people be so lacking in common sense?

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry, I'm making a lot of comments on this post, but this video really highlights so many issues to do with transgender ideology and trans rights demands.

In the UK currently, the trans rights movement are trying to characterise any psychological counselling other than unquestioning affirmation as 'transgender conversion therapy' and want this to be made illegal.

And yet, this article from 2017 about de-transitioners having surgery to reverse their 'gender reassignment surgery' has a quote from the Scottish Trans Alliance demanding that de-transitioners:

""If a person has regret about undergoing gender reassignment, it is especially important that they receive counselling and in-depth assessment before undergoing any surgery to attempt partial reversal as their chance of regretting further surgery could be even higher," he said."

The Scottish Trans Alliance believe it's necessary for a de-transitioning person to have pschological therapy because apparently there are factors other than not actually being transgender that might influence a person's decision to detransition:

It's not simply a case of people regretting their decision, explains James Morton, manager at the Scottish Trans Alliance, who told The Independent that a range of factors could catalyse the desire for a gender reversal including unusual surgical complications, being worn down by transphobic harassment, family rejection, or developing religious or political beliefs that being transgender is unacceptable.

And yet the Trans Rights campaign to ban 'transgender conversion therapy' shows that they don't believe that a range of factors could catalyse the desire for a gender transition.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gender-reversal-surgery-demand-rise-assignment-men-women-trans-a7980416.html

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish that Emma Watson et al would watch this video and realise that it is important that people with gender dysphoria receive long term psychological therapy before they are prescribed puberty blockers, HRT, or approved for 'sex-change' surgery. Unfortunately, the trans rights lobby are framing psychological therapy as transgender conversion therapy.

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't believe that people can be born with a male brain in a female body, or a female brain in a male body, or a non-binary brain in a male or female body. I don't believe in gender. Hormones affect behaviour. Socialisation according to regressive gender stereotypes affect behaviour. The physical realities of having a male anatomy versus a female anatomy affect behaviour.

Gender dysphoria, the belief that you were born with a body that does not match your brain is a mental illness. There are other mental illnesses characterised by body dysmorphia, such as anorexia and body integrity identity disorder (BIID).

One of the trans rights demands is that medical transition (puberty blockers, HRT, surgery) should be affirmative only. They are outraged with the idea of medical gate-keeping - questionning a person who identifies as transgender to find the reasons that contribute to them identifying as transgender.

These issues could be: gender dysphoria (mental illness), internalised homophobia, internalised misogyny, females thinking that they can escape misogny by identifying as trans, autism, Munchausen's by proxy parents, autogynophilic fetish - but autogynophiles are less likely to want to surgically transition anyway, incel smuglords - men who enjoy being male-bodied and making society address them as women and allow them access to women's spaces.

There are so many obvious reasons why people should undergo psychological therapy before access to medical transition, but the trans rights lobby have labelled anything other than unquestionning affirmation as 'transgender conversion therapy'.

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think a big factor is that 'people who identify as transgender' have managed to persuade half the LGB community that opposition to transgender ideology is analogous to opposition to gay rights.

The 'LGB with the T' crowd have been convinced that anyone who questions transgender ideology or opposes certain demands of 'people who identify as transgender' are transphobic bigots. So the trans rights activists have managed to equate homophobia with (their spurious definition of) transphobia in the minds of the LGB community, and in the minds of wider society.

If you dispute any tenet of transgender ideology or criticise any demand of transgender rights you will be viewed as a bigot.

debunking: sex and gender are 2 separate things by judith in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think I lost brain cells reading that.

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is so sad. He will never be able to undo the horrific damage that has been done to him. I still have trouble understanding how we got to a place where castrating young people is normal and people who object to such butchery are bigots.

"Jane" and "her" laryngial protuberance explain why "she" and her fellows were the victims of mean TERFs in Manchester by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Where to even start with “Jane”? I guess what is most galling is his claim that women are appropriating the suffragettes’ history and symbolism and the way he thinks the suffragette’s memory should be honored is by silencing women’s political expression. Right, silencing women is totally what the suffragettes were fighting for.

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"I was really brainwashed to be honest and as of now I completely hate that I ever came across this notion 'the trans thing' and like I wish I never did I would have probably been better off physically and emotionally. Ever since I became a woman I lost my strengths. I've been raped, assaulted, I became more emotionally vulnerable to manipulative men. And honestly I hate everything about the female experience that doctors and pharmacies sold me."

Statistics for the UK: 98 % of sexual assaults are committed by males. 88 % of sexual assault victims are female.

People identify as transgender for various reasons. A significant number of females decide to identify as transgender because they imagine it is a way to opt out of the common female experience of being sexually assaulted, harrassed, coerced, and manipulated by males.

Here is an example of a young man comparing his experiences as a man and as a trans woman and recognising that there is a significant pattern of male toxic behaviour towards women.

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]Chunkeeguy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How long before the #blackpampers turn up at her house though?

At last, the answer to an age old question: "what is a woman?" by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol that didn't explain anything.

Judge rules California law requiring women on corporate boards is unconstitutional by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's the point of such a requirement if anyone can identify as a woman?

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This person has been getting a lot of traction online. Arty Morty just did an interview with him. Detransitioners becoming harder to ignore

MtF - osteoporosis, skoliosis, no sexual function, and overwhelming regret. by leached_outcrop in GenderCritical

[–]JulienMayfair 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is really sad, and it brings back memories of what an FtM friend of mine said not too long before she committed suicide, particularly the fact that, in the long run, transition did not make her happy.

This is so disturbing. They're always pushing boundaries. ANY boundary that exists between real women and "trans" women must be brought down. by bolla_top in GenderCritical

[–]Chunkeeguy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's so sick. taking a child into your extreme fetish life. Yet there'll be no concern about this perversion in woke liberal circles.

The Great Question Of Our Time by Finnegan7921 in GenderCritical

[–]NoMorePatriarchy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I hope this will help a mainstream audience learn about the harms of gender ideology, but I don't consider Matt Walsh an ally. He's a homophobic, misogynistic MRA, and centering misogyny/homophobia will ensure the permeance of gender ideology, which is counterproductive. Just watch some nice Exulansic or Magdalen Berns videos instead.

The Great Question Of Our Time by Finnegan7921 in GenderCritical

[–]Finnegan7921[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Conservative source, but if the trailer is anything to go by, should be an intersting watch.

It's almost as though transwomen are men and transmen are women by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]eng 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

:o

Indisputable evidence of the damage oestrogen does to men’s brains by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]eng 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

in seriousness, some actual research on this subject is in order.

Anyone here that could provide a Code for Ovarit? by Femina in GenderCritical

[–]grassfed 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No

ACLU Claims “Males, Females” Do Not Exist in Court Docs by NoMorePatriarchy in GenderCritical

[–]Finnegan7921 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The ACLU has gone from a great organization to nothing more than the legal department of Woke Inc.

There are two kinds of women by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The TRAs won't be happy with Peter Tatchell distinguishing sex and gender identity. I suspect he's headed for a cancellation.

ACLU Claims “Males, Females” Do Not Exist in Court Docs by NoMorePatriarchy in GenderCritical

[–]Chunkeeguy 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And when you show previously sane people this sort of evidence, they call you bigoted and transphobic. What a dystopia we're living in.

Many Afghan women pushing back against Taliban orders to cover up by eng in GenderCritical

[–]Chunkeeguy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can't get braver than that

NJ woman who forced daughter she fathered into child porn sentenced to 25 years in prison by Femaleisnthateful in GenderCritical

[–]Chocolatepudding 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No sympathy whatsoever for an adult allowing a child to suffer like that because of 'scared'. All three are despicable

NJ woman who forced daughter she fathered into child porn sentenced to 25 years in prison by Femaleisnthateful in GenderCritical

[–]Clio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Less woman-blaming, please. If these men ganged up to sexually torture a 7-year-old, what do you think they've been doing to her?

So near yet so far by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not really, just getting further and further away: "The TL:DR is that yes, it's a me problem. Trans women are beautiful and unique, it's our business what we wear, and haters are gonna hate anyway so I need to get over myself. And I promise I'm working on it."

How ridiculous. He specifically mentioned dressing age-inappropriately which is real for anyone not just cross-dressing liars. It's also why it's so much about grooming of kids.

Breastfeeding counsellor SACKED as ‘mother’ deemed ‘hate speech’ by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They took "woman", then "female", now they just eliminate "mother". How is this sustainable? How close do they think we are to like total apocalypse and comets crashing down on every city and the sun exploding? Honestly how can any pretend the society they are creating is livable?

Breastfeeding counsellor SACKED as ‘mother’ deemed ‘hate speech’ by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]NoMorePatriarchy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sometimes these things are so silly that it feels like we're living in the Truman Show.

(WARNING: SA, lesbophobia!) IMPORTANT! There is a reddit group about abusing lesbians being ran a transwoman and men! Please help report this group! Link in description to report it. by jay-day in GenderCritical

[–]jay-day[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reuploaded to show the group name!

‼️‼️‼️You can report it here: https://reddit.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360001103212 ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

Edit: This site supports conversion therapy. Preys on women that have been abused. Uses slurs. Posts content on lesbians being kidnapped, abused, and r*ped.

How to be a woman by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So I guess sexual orientation is meaningless, eh?

How to be a woman by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]Chocolatepudding 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pass the bucket

How to be a woman by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]Doberlady 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is someone's fetish art.

Armed and dangerous 'woman' sought for allegedly killing boyfriend and brother by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's the point of issuing physical descriptions if words don't mean anything?

Designer of Underwear to 'Flatten' Boys Genitals Accused of Child Abuse - Women Are Human by firebird in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Off topic but as soon as I scrolled down a bit and saw the forehead, I knew it was a dude. I know people have posted comments about how the shape or structure of the skull was a dead give away, but I just always figured I'm clueless enough for that to not be the tell for me and never really thought about it. This pic really leaped out at me though with the Austin Power's line "that's a man, baby"

How to be a woman by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's frightening. Especially since we know the actual ending is the dude claiming to be prettier than the actual woman and thus more of a woman because reality has been replaced by a set of objectifying criteria.

I heard Jordan Peterson talking about the idea I think he called "Construct verification", that when you want to investigate some idea you have to try to make sure it is a real phenomena and that it is not just a term for a non-real idea that is actually described better by some existing idea. The obvious thing is that gender is a non-real idea that is better described in nearly all instances by sex and sex based differeces. Instead of seeing the way society treats people differently based on sex, gender ideology pretends it is an innate property of people that creates the difference. Instead of "if A then B", they say "If B, then A" or they extend the "If" to an "If and only If"-- bad logic. But if "B" is "they treat you the way they treat women", then they do a bait and switch and say "if you act according to some stereotype then you are that which they stereotype".

There is no core being with complexities that result in real individuality in their view, no real person, just what society projects on a person. And that is used to hide the simple fact that a bunch of guys addicted to porn lost their literal minds and demand everyone indulge their fantasy. If Socrates is right, they are really engaged in a cry for help no matter how much they protest otherwise (where Socrates thinks the criminal wants criminal justice as much as anyone else, to correct their errors and to deal with their guilt)

I thought transwomen are women, why aren't they talking about the recent Roe v. Wade debacle? ... oh, wait... (big old rant) by Erised in GenderCritical

[–]Doberlady 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Liberals really fucked up by doubling down on trans rights. Average normal people can look at Lia Thomas cheating her way to the top and understand that that's fucking bullshit, let alone boomers and rural Trump fans who actively hate trans people. Democrats aren't going to win over opposing voters by hyperfocusing on trans issues that affect a miniscule percentage of the population. Meanwhile, issues that affect everyone like healthcare and abortion get zero attention, and look where we are now!

Transwomen don't have to worry about being forced to carry a pregnancy they don't want. They will never know the fear and anger women are experiencing right now.

Oh well. I guess the Christian Sharia Law taking over the country might at least have the effect of transwomen being legislated out of existence. Ironic.

Designer of Underwear to 'Flatten' Boys Genitals Accused of Child Abuse - Women Are Human by firebird in GenderCritical

[–]firebird[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

NJ woman who forced daughter she fathered into child porn sentenced to 25 years in prison by Femaleisnthateful in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This man took his SEVEN-year-old daughter across state lines for the purpose of having her sexually assaulted by multiple people including himself, kept her in a cage, and placed her in a neck collar, but he is not a sexually violent predator? I do not know how the public defender said that with a straight face. There is not a place far enough in hell for such evil.

Poor girl. I hope she will be able to recover from the torment she suffered. I cannot even imagine. Thank heaven for her grandmother looking out for her. I wonder where her mother is.

NJ woman who forced daughter she fathered into child porn sentenced to 25 years in prison by Femaleisnthateful in GenderCritical

[–]Chocolatepudding 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Two transgender women involved and a biological woman who was so 'scared' she allowed a child to suffer unimaginable harm. Making just one phone call far too scary so just let the child suffer. Shame on her, shame on the lot of them. Scum

Indisputable evidence of the damage oestrogen does to men’s brains by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Michael_frf 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I doubt hormones actually do that, since there are a lot of people who are both computer nerds and MTF. I don't have actual statistics, but it looks to me like they are actually quite over-represented among computer enthusiasts that TRAs would consider "female".

This person probably just has a fetish for transforming into a "dumb blonde" (mentally; I'm not saying anything about the literal colour of his hair), and is kidding himself that he can't act that way without hormones, but can't help it while he's on them.

What is a woman? by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Woman: anyone who wants to use she/her pronouns.

A man gives women a few tips on how we can erase ourselves. Don't say women, and don't talk about women's rights. All with a smile. by jay-day in GenderCritical

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is this TikTok or Instagram? Either way, total cesspool, also spying on people, definitely should be kept far away from unrotted brains.

A man gives women a few tips on how we can erase ourselves. Don't say women, and don't talk about women's rights. All with a smile. by jay-day in GenderCritical

[–]JoeyJoeJoe 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do not surrender your language to this insane cult. Language shapes reality.

Indisputable evidence of the damage oestrogen does to men’s brains by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hate how TiMs like act like they have special insight into being female and use their trans experiences to reinforce their own chauvinistic ideas of womanhood.

‎Intelligence Squared: The Animal Queendom: Rethinking Zoology, with Lucy Cooke by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A great critique of how sexist assumptions pervade biology. Also, at the start they have to address the question of sex versus gender, and they handily dispose of gender at the outset by noting that it is a social construct that no other animal is known to experience.

I thought transwomen are women, why aren't they talking about the recent Roe v. Wade debacle? ... oh, wait... (big old rant) by Erised in GenderCritical

[–]picklesarnie 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Woman is a person with female reproductive anatomy and XX chromosomes. A uterus haver. A birthing person.

Man is a person with male reproductive anatomy and XY chromosomes. A testes haver. A person who inseminates.

Sex is biological categorisation and there are only two categories: male and female.

Intersex is a misnomer. Intersex medical conditions are disorders of sexual development, i.e. disorders of anatomical development. There is no third sex. There are plenty of other types of disorders of anatomical development, but that does not make a new category of human being.

Pregnant 'trans men' are just women who don't want to accept that they are women because of internalised misogyny and/or a ridiculous belief that classification as man or woman is based on regressive gender stereotypes.

Short hair, facial hair, mastectomy, receding hairline does not change a woman into a man.

Anyone who has insisted that the word woman be replaced with 'uterus-haver' or 'birthing-person' needs to be consistent in the terminology they use. If you have ever advocated for the terms 'uterus-haver' or 'birthing-person' then you can't talk about women's right's - because now (trans) men can be pregnant people and (trans) women can use their lady-cock to impregnate a uterus-haver.

The word woman is important in discussing the rights of female-bodied people. It makes it clear which people are being affected by the issue.

Misogynists are the only people who gain from changing the definition of the word woman from a biological definition to a performative stereotype.

It's a fetish by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Two different posters said they get turned on by their boyfriends telling them “good boy.” It is always interesting to see how supposedly breaking the binary results in the same heteronormative, patriarchal sex roles. Regardless of what gender switching they try to do, the male in the relationship always seems to dominate the female.

I thought transwomen are women, why aren't they talking about the recent Roe v. Wade debacle? ... oh, wait... (big old rant) by Erised in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's funny ( albeit not ha-ha funny) that the news about R v W suddenly has Reddit talking about women's rights again.

It's a fetish by Chocolatepudding in GenderCritical

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And those are the women.

As a biology student, I must ask, just exactly what hole in the ground are all of these morons crawling out of? by CleverFoolOfEarth in GenderCritical

[–]snub-nosedmonkey 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Extremist trans ideology is like a religion. Once you buy into it, the ideology matters more than objective reality. People are also afraid to push back from this anti-science nonsense for fear of being labelled 'transphobic'.

Amazon Employees Melt Down Over GC Book "Johnny the Walrus" by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]sneeuweekhoorn 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How do these people function in day to day life if they can't even handle the existence of a book without experiencing trauma?

She took out her penis... by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Where did you find this? Please post it on Ovarit if you're there.

She took out her penis... by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, that was some read. Trans really is a free pass to get away with anything.

Also, the negative life experiences that everyone involved in this case seems to think makes this TIM so exceptional and deserving of extra sympathy and leeway are commonplace experiences for many females. Low self-esteem, family trauma, a childhood with many unfortunate experiences, repeatedly being sexualized by others, a history of being sexually assaulted by men, not being taken seriously or accorded respect by others, barriers to obtaining education, discrimination in employment, boyfriends who cheated and were uncaring, exploitive, abusive ... That and far worse is the "lived experience" of lots of women I know. Hell, that's my lived experience as a young woman.

But women don't customarily respond to the crap we've been through in life by going around sexually molesting men and pretending the bad hand we've been dealt in life somehow gives us license to ignore professional responsibilities and basic common decency by treating people put in our care like they are subhumans objects put there for us to use and abuse like this. And this guy has the nerve to complain about other people sexualizing him - sheesh.

Amazon Employees Melt Down Over GC Book "Johnny the Walrus" by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]Femaleisnthateful 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The irony is that the book isn't all that different from 'I Am Jazz' or a hundred other pro-trans kids books.

Amazon Employees Melt Down Over GC Book "Johnny the Walrus" by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]Finnegan7921 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I really do not understand how we got here as a society and how so many of these people seem to end up concentrated in the same places with NOBODY to tell them to stfu and get back to work.

She took out her penis... by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Chunkeeguy[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Time off for being trans

She took out her penis... by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Chocolatepudding 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This sex offender can reregister in six months. Should've been charged with sexual assault. Disgusting

Amazon Employees Melt Down Over GC Book "Johnny the Walrus" by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]WildApples[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I especially like how these people blatantly lie and claim the book is about killing children. Who needs facts these days? This struggle session is terrifying glimpse into how normalized censorship has become at Amazon.

She took out her penis... by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]Chunkeeguy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup. Sickening.