all 29 comments

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 16 insightful - 18 fun16 insightful - 17 fun17 insightful - 18 fun -  (10 children)

Would it kill you exclusionists to incorporate some stargender?

[–]hufflepuff-poet 17 insightful - 14 fun17 insightful - 13 fun18 insightful - 14 fun -  (1 child)

Just found my new gender identity uwu! 🌟 Stargender/Starsexual looking for another star to collide with, let's destroy this trash solar system 😂 pronouns: star/stairs/stars

Eta: this is the coolest flag though, why do they keep wasting cool flag designs on made up bs.

[–]Smolders1Cock is god's greatest gift. 12 insightful - 8 fun12 insightful - 7 fun13 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Star-fucking-gender.

[–]hermiona52 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

What the hell I just read. It sounds exactly like something from The Onion, but it's for real... holy shit.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kind of like the alternate flag.

Otherwise, I don't know whether to laugh, cry or shake my head at it all.

[–]NiceDickBro 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Why can’t these people contribute to SCP stories? At least they’re entertaining fiction.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I listen to creepypasta and heard the term SCP from time to time. It is like a kind of MiB organization?

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's an original spin on the MIB concept.

The SCP ("Secure, Contain, Protect") Foundation: super-secret outfit dedicated to keeping humanity safe from, and ignorant of, paranormal stuff ("SCPs") which can't be destroyed. Creating/chronicling it is a collaborative writing project, based on short stories.

What's distinctive is the short stories' style: they're written in the form of scientific reports, and use that to generate mood. The thoroughly-unemotional, just-the-facts tone contrasts creepily with the mindbending weirdness being described, and much unease results from the strategic use of... redactions! (Which allow authors to hint at Terrible Things... and your imagination to do the rest.)

But beware: I've heard that the transcult has infiltrated SCP, too! As in some contributors now writing stories "centering" their obsession with T identity. Is nothing sacred? But I guess it DOES qualify as scary (just not in a fun way...). Apparently the ONE weird-ass thing that SCP has failed to secure, contain, or protect us from! :(

http://www.scpwiki.com/

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Very interesting. Thanks for explaining it. I kinda get a very 'House of Leaves' vibe when reading about SCPs like the campus stairs one(087). Mostly those that involve some sort of exploration or descent into impossible structural spaces, unique from their ordinary counterparts where one is not meant to linger long anyway(liminal space?). Usually lacking in illumination(physical and figurative) due to some presence. Yeah, that compounds the unsettling feeling; Being alone with phenomena that doesn't quite add up and so makes one uncomfortable. Like a penis on a female.

[–]NiceDickBro 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah kind of, it’s something like, secure contain protect, so essentially it documents and is a storage facility for paranormal entities. Just a fun wiki really with some really creative articles.

The most popular and well known would be good old 173, also gives a good idea of the vibe of the site.

http://www.scpwiki.com/scp-173

[–]Smolders1Cock is god's greatest gift. 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Uhm... you forgot the numbers? /s

People unironically making flags like these make a complete fucking mockery of our community. My flag may be a part of whatever they decide to create next, but I am not. I do not support this type of shit.

But of course us icky homo/bisexuals don't get a say, we're just expected to constantly make room in our community for nonexistent sexualities.

The only letters I will ever support in that fucking alphabet club are the L, the G and the B. Those are the people who the community was made for, but I'm expected to fly with this bullshit? No thanks.

(Don't worry, OP, I know you did it ironically lmao. Shit like this just pisses me off. Apologies.)

EDIT: Words.

[–]LasagnaRossa 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't even know why we need so many flags. The rainbow was chosen for a reason!

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 8 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 8 fun -  (1 child)

BuT wHeRe Is ThE iNfRaReD sPeCtRuM oN tHe RaInBoW?

[–]TarshishJupiterpolitically homeless 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Infraredgender folx are valid too! uwu

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 12 insightful - 8 fun12 insightful - 7 fun13 insightful - 8 fun -  (5 children)

WHERE IS THE BI FLAG YOU BIPHOBE????

/s <3

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one 20 insightful - 9 fun20 insightful - 8 fun21 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

There no LGB flags in there. We are too outdated :(

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

In to say the same thing /s

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

(Like... I know the "/s" isn't needed, especially not HERE, but I feel so wrong calling someone a "anything-phobe" even as a joke without putting that /s there. I know it's weird LOL)

[–]reluctant_commenter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Honestly I feel like I'm so used to people seeing people called a whatever-phobe in ridiculous contexts but not as a joke, so I use the /s too even when it should be obvious lol.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

To the point that "phobe-phobe" can't be far off.

Or (god save us) "phobe-phobe-phobe".

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

If it gets to this point, maybe just make a pyramid so you can keep track of who's the most oppressed / who can't be questioned. Top of it will be QTPOC of course.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Give it 6 months and we'll be at this point...

[–]Willpoll 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

If I see people start using this unironically I swear

[–]CleverNickName 7 insightful - 9 fun7 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

that's just 2 iterations away from the TV test signal

[–]INeedSomeTimeAsexual Ally 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Straight-up awful. Describes this movement perfectly.

[–]CJLez 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know a teenage gay guy (actually homosexual, not just 'queer') who collects physical 'pride flags' and thinks that they are all so wonderful - the state of some of these flags... if you hadn't said this was fake I would have believed it was real.

[–]oofreesouloo⚡super lesbian⚡ 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

So ugly haha

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One day they'll be using these flags to teach first year game design students how not to use texture offsets.