r/lgbt - It’s my birthday first birthday as a girl. Can you tell me I’m pretty Reddit? by cutenoobies in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The comments calling him pretty lol

He must be a troll, I can't believe otherwise

Even when explained, they still are the same goddamn label by LasagnaRossa in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And neither of them describe a legit bisexual flavor, the one which is trans exclusionary.

Even when explained, they still are the same goddamn label by LasagnaRossa in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Huh, don't get me started... I once got an argument in that stupid subreddit with someone who told me to educate myself when I told him that bi in Latin means two.

Another time another user said that "two" means "two type of genders": your own and all the other ones.

They are so goddamn stupid.

Reminder that non-binaries are just as invasive by milknciggies in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This must be satire, right?

The joy of lesbian sex by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah yes, the infamous women who threaten to rape anyone who they disagree with!

God bless these delusional straight girls for peaking more and more of the gaybros by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is size anyway? Words eVoLVe babes!

Lesbian fetishization on egg_irl by blackrainbow in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No foreplay and all jackhammering?

I've read some comments that implied that "loving as a woman" = foreplay and kisses

Oh no!! The blacklesbians sub has a post asking about "trans women" 😖 by censorshipment in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is it a private sub? I can't read anything.

Oh no!! The blacklesbians sub has a post asking about "trans women" 😖 by censorshipment in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I once made the same statement, fully aware that they NEVER pass. It is basically a way to say "no" without alarming the woke police.

Oh no!! The blacklesbians sub has a post asking about "trans women" 😖 by censorshipment in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LMAO the dude calling lesbians perverted because they think of stranger's genitals. Reported immediately.

"Book about lesbian sex - Girl Sex 101" - on cover 40% of "lesbians" are men, book have whole chapters about PiV and PiA sex by ZveroboyAlina in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 33 insightful - 2 fun33 insightful - 1 fun34 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The males don't even attempt to look feminine! LOL!

Why the fuck are men drawn in a handbook for lesbians?!

One of these things is exactly like the others... no, wait... by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The author was a late teenager at the time of the comic.

Source: I used to follow him on deviantart

She married a man, then came out as lesbian when the man morphed into a half-man, half-woman? This is some quantum mechanics level complexity. by ukrdude10 in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

every single one of those commenters is an utter nutjob or 12-year-old victims of queer theory. This is sadly the natural result of when you redefine gay to mean something other than homosexual.

This is the sad result when you kick anyone who disagrees with the agenda

OVARIT SUCKS by akkordeonplayer in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, those names are general af. How do you remember that radfemmery is a troll sub and women's liberation is about feminism? It makes little sense!

"Bisexuality isn't attraction to men and women!" - bisexual erasure on the "ball" propaganda subreddit by reluctant_commenter in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This is what happens when you redefine bisexuality. "Two or more genders" means that you can like girls and tomboys and still be bi.

"Bisexuality isn't attraction to men and women!" - bisexual erasure on the "ball" propaganda subreddit by reluctant_commenter in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

As I expected, a bunch of kids post in that sub...

Ovarit code? by AreYouSureee in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hello, do you still want it?

Ovarit code? by AreYouSureee in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can. Do you still need it?

Does LGB Alliance know about us? And if not, should we reach out to them? by reluctant_commenter in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I recall correctly that and the GC subs got popular after some tweets from JK Rowling

This is a test created by TIMs for other prospective TIMs to test if they have real ladybrain. Test yourself and find out! by gendercritfem in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I got the same result. Many questions were so stupid! And whoever made this quiz wasn't a woman, since mamy answers lacked true female perspective.

Does anyone watch big mouth ? They have a new trans character. by Criticallacitirc in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They must have drunk the woke coolaid then, because in the previous season the T protested because a new character explained the difference between pan and bi. They called the authors transphobic because they made the girl say that she likes only boy and girls therefore she's bisexual.

Are you one of thooooseeeee people?? by fuckupaddams in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They want to feel part of the "cool kids" group, that's it.

Are you one of thooooseeeee people?? by fuckupaddams in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 22 insightful - 5 fun22 insightful - 4 fun23 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

In the same way they advertised gender criticals. LOL they're so dumb! Guess how I found that sub, huh?

AGP fantasy on actualtransbians by artetolife in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's my take indeed

AGP fantasy on actualtransbians by artetolife in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ngl, the comic in itself tells a wholesome story and I think it's cute

ActualLesbians mods are gutter trash lmao by marmorsymphata in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It would trigger dysphoria, it might be

More Concern Over the Online Art Community by Sistersovermisters in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Worse, they're seen as a badge of courage and coolness, the ultimate symbol that "I'm not like other girls."

I wonder if these girls hate breasts because they're the symbol of sexualization. "Remember girl, you're not a person first, you're an eye candy, a fucktoy".

We've had threads on asexuality, what about demisexuality? by hyunnahh in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In the era of hookup culture, wanting to fall in love before fucking needs a badge.

About the lack of logic in gender movement on Page's example by MezozoicGay in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're trying to apply logic where there isn't any.

It honestly depresses me that more and more women are opting out of being women. by questioningtw in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. You can't opt out because you didn't opt in in the first place.

Ellen Page is claiming to be transgender. What is going on?! by socialistrobot in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 77 insightful - 9 fun77 insightful - 8 fun78 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

I couldn't believe it and looked on wikipedia. They have already changed all the pronouns and her name.

This is so stupid.

You're telling me that after 33 years you discovered you're a mAn iNSiDe? You're whole career is based on your pretty look and cute face!

Yes Ellen, when people see your photos they clearly think of a man now, just because you say so. Ceci n'est pas une pipe.

I was watching The Queen's Gambit and immediately noticed the man posing as a female in the first episode. (Very minor spoilers.) by Nonime in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OOOOHHHHH so it was really a man!!!

That "lady" sounded and looked too off to be mistaken for a woman.

The agony and the irony by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 9 insightful - 11 fun9 insightful - 10 fun10 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

The ✨s✨o✨ u✨ l✨ of course!

Louder for the back by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The modes removing any dissenting comment. Fuck them.

Asexuals shouldn't be in the LGB community in the first place, let alone if they're goddamn STRAIGHT.

Louder for the back by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

But you don't understand, the cis het on the OP doesn't like sex! TOTALLY DIFFERENT!

"Sir! This is r/AskGayMen! We will not have any of this 'homosexual' business here!" by ThrowMeAway2879 in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ooooohhhh so it's not the same sub! Well, now that explains ita lot.

"Sir! This is r/AskGayMen! We will not have any of this 'homosexual' business here!" by ThrowMeAway2879 in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

But what if your husband loses his dick in a car accident???? Would he be female now? Of course not! Gotcha terves!

A thread about bisexuality by 8bitgay in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is obvious that they are changing meanings, because the bi in bisexual has always meant "the two sexes". Proof:

1) Before all this TRA non sense people recognized only two sexes. Gender is the polite form for the same word.

2) Straight means "attracted to the opposite sex". OPPOSITE, not any other one which isn't yours.

So bisexual has always implied that you're both things, "straight" and "gay", you like the opposite sex and your own. TWO sexes.

Pansexual label was invented when modern medicine was able to successfully make up people in the opposite sex. Since it's not that obvious to like someone with mixed up parts, they invented the label pan, which means "all", in this case you like any combination of appearance.

Screaming that this origin is transphobic won't change our sexualities.

A post on r/me_irlgbt about breaking up with someone when they reveal they are trans. Comments are prime peak material by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Having a genital preference is perfectly fine. Refusing to date someone just because they are trans alone is not, imo.

I never understood this logic, it's basically the same thing. If I have a "genital preference" I'm automatically excluding trans people from my dating pool.

So a friend came out as bi, I guess? (Bi people help) by oofreesouloo in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The straight couple was more genuine, in my opinion. I liked them a lot.

Anyway, it's a nice drama, if you don't mind the horror vibes. If you're looking for something more scary like its predecessor, you'll be disappointed.

So a friend came out as bi, I guess? (Bi people help) by oofreesouloo in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

especially if it's a period of time or location where it is unlikely to have gay characters that are openly gay.

Like The Haunting of Bly Manor, where the main character is lesbian and everyone, I swear everyone is okay with that, in the rural side of England in the eighties.

And I didn't even see the chemistry between the two girls, but that's me. Many people loved them.

Badmensanatomy post turns into a homophobic dumpster fire and woke asskissing fest by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because mentally ill people don't like being reminded they don't see the world as it is.

It's great we've ejected lesbians and bis who don't drink the kool-aid, hope we can do the same thing to gay men! by Lesbianese in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 19 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Sometimes the trash takes out itself.

Let them go, so that we can finally make our own LGB community with their bless.

proof that being trans has been about gender roles all along. by questioningtw in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So THAT'S it? That's the gotcha? An article saying that women used to hunt too?

And WE'RE the sexist?!?

They are not even hiding that they are MRA anymore: "Remove women-centric language when speaking about abortions and reproductive rights" by VioletRemi in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Real women are never threatened by other women who talk about their biological functions, because they know they are women even though their cycle is irregular, they don't want children or they aren't in their fertile age anymore. Every variation is a different way to be a woman.

Only men in dresses get offended by it, because they know that they lack the only condition to be called woman: being born one.

"Male Vagina" girl went back to her trans echo chamber - commentors are homophobic asshats as usual by Rosefield in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We all know the answer: going for bi men isn't validating enough

"What's the difference between pan and bi?" Confused answers ensued by LasagnaRossa in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The overwrite of the meaning of the pink and blue stripes is the icing on the cake lol

Oh, the schadenfreude by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

With the T, always have been

Oh bravo: Norway has made biphobic, transphobic speech illegal by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not Norwegian but my country (Italy) is currently discussing this same bill. It will become illegal to discriminate or hit someone for sexual orientation and gender alone. In fact the sentence will be harsher if it is proven you hate the victim's category.

Our bill keeps the freedom to have an opinion and it looks like so does the Norwegian one.

About the idea that playing along with trans fantasies is the polite thing to do by BiologyIsReal in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What I find funny is that they immediately go into "extreme distress" at the slightest provocation.

You reminded me an old conversation I had online with a person about transexuality. I was never unpolite and my thoughts were pretty philosophical.

Well, it turns out I was talking with a trans person who, at the end, asked me all offended why I was so hateful with them. I didn't even know who I had on the other side, I talked with them as I talk with everyone.

That conversation led me to reaffirm my suspicions: these people have mental issues. Any other person would have not reacted that way.

And I speak as a person who has her own issues, uh. I recognize I can't policy the thoughts of others and understand that if I get offended by some things, it's up to me.

Tell me how this is not a mental issue. Sane people don't get distressed because they got misgendered by LasagnaRossa in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course the real girl doesn't get offended if someone misgenders her, since she knows that if you call a rose "leaf", it doesn't stop to be a rose.

The trans girl on the other hand knows deep down he's not a real girl, and hopes that words will change reality. As if we are women because people call us so.

Pure wishful thinking, these people are more deluded than anything and I'm shocked that liberals are going along with them.

Should bisexuality get a distinction and coexist with pansexuality? (as in a image below) or should bisexuality also include men and women who are attracted to transmen/transwomen? pansexuality be reclaimed? What is your opinion about this? by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like I mentioned in the s/bisexuals sub, I'd propose using the terms "TIBs" for Trans Inclusive Bisexuals or the extreme version(the trans-chasers) "TEBs" for Trans Exclusive Bisexuals. This is to mirror already existing terms "FEBs" for Female Exclusive Bisexuals and "MEBs" for Male Exclusive Bisexuals.

Ohhh that's nice, this is the first time I've read that and I already like it.

And with the same format the versions for those straights and gays who like trans people too can be made: TIH, TIG and TIL.

Should bisexuality get a distinction and coexist with pansexuality? (as in a image below) or should bisexuality also include men and women who are attracted to transmen/transwomen? pansexuality be reclaimed? What is your opinion about this? by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're still expected to be sexually available to trans people no matter what you call yourself.

I think labels should describe behaviours, not the other way around.

Afterall if getting attracted to people with mixed sexual characteristics isn't instinctive to everybody, that must mean something.

I understand your logic and you are kinda right, but my experience tells me something is still off. There are many men who are attracted to women and transwomen but can't get aroused to "complete" men. In the same way there are many men who are attracted to women only, so it's not that obvious to overlook a dick like you would do with a birthmark.

I myself, when I see a trans person I instinctively like one half or the other half but can't like them both at the same time in the same person. It's odd, it's like there's a switch in me: I like chips and chocolate cake but don't like chips in my cake, whereas others can.

And in those days where these thoughts weren't removed, many other bisexuals used to describe the same feelings.

Should bisexuality get a distinction and coexist with pansexuality? (as in a image below) or should bisexuality also include men and women who are attracted to transmen/transwomen? pansexuality be reclaimed? What is your opinion about this? by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think "pansexual" would be a good word for it. It's not really a different sexuality because TW are male and TM are female

I have a different opinion on this matter.

Me and other bisexuals know we can't get attracted to transmen and transwomen and see how different we are from those who can. Having a clear label for this distinction is useful, and there should be for those who are "straight" and "gay" too.

Just because we like both sexes it doesn't mean we like mixed sexual characteristics. If someone is able to do that, they should signal their availability with a different label.

I'm saddened that recently this lack of attraction is seen as transphobic, like if we had any decision in the matter. The two labels had a purpose and were useful, back in the days.

Has anyone debunked the split attraction model? Are romantic and sexual attractions separate from one another as the TQ believe? Are there really such things as 'heteroromantic', 'biromantic', and 'homoromantic'? And if not, can you explain why romantic and sexual attractions are not separate? by MarcelineKnows in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And honestly I don't think most men experience love, straight or gay.

Lmao talk for yourself. Many men can love and be loved, just because you didn't got that lucky yet it doesn't mean that love doesn't exist or men are incapable to love.

It's insulting to say that there is any "love" involved in meaningless hookups and men being perverts.

But there's love in gay relationships, just like any relationship based on affection and trust.

Why do we not hear as much pushback from gay, lesbian, and bisexual people against gender ideology? by yousaythosethings in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 20 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

They always cop out with that stupid genital preference concept. No dude, you said trans women are women, you're straight, you must date them too.

TiM catfishes redditor and pretends to be a beautiful woman, redditor is not interested to go on a second date, TiM throws a tantrum and calls them a bigot by MinisterOfTerfery in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Damn incels and their obsession with soy

About four-in-ten U.S. adults say forms should offer more than two gender options by worried19 in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let's them have it but add the "what's between your legs" question.

Actual Transbians: obviously attempting to rape women by deception is fine. by julesburm1891 in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm also pissed that they think we are coward for not leaving a comment, when we simply can't leave a disagreeing comment!

Sam Smith reveals they're open to dating a man, woman, or non-binary person by worried19 in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Remember that in woke speech men can be women and nonbinary. So you can still be gay in practice.

Those are all bisexual with extra steps by LasagnaRossa in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 27 insightful - 6 fun27 insightful - 5 fun28 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Don't ask me.

I once discussed with a self claimed pansexual about the lack of difference between the two definitions. He tried to tell me that it was like pizza: bisexuals like all the toppings, whereas pansexuals don't mind toppings, they just like pizza.

He didn't like when I observed that in order to not mind the topping, you already need to love all of them. He really truly didn't understand.

These people must be utterly stupid, I can't think anything different.

Do words mean anything? Why does the "bi" in "bisexual" magically mean "all" but the "bi" in "bigender" doesn't?

And in bicycle, bilingual, bipedal... They all mean two but in one word. Language is so magical UwU

When transphobic reality bites your little tushie so hard by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fine, so this shit will have an end.

Star Trek's "first nonbinary character". by bopomofodojo in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 29 insightful - 4 fun29 insightful - 3 fun30 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Non-binary = tomboy, got it

Lesbians these days uwu by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 35 insightful - 11 fun35 insightful - 10 fun36 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

And over 400 upvotes

I bet that if this dude posted on gonewild the straight males would be (f)urious

Cisgendered menstruators want to erase my identity | Jarvis Dupont | Spectator USA by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I swear it looked real

This "trans man" thinks mulan is a "trans man", I thought maybe you'd want to see this thing I found too 😞 by EverydayIsSad in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I genuinely laughed at her take about the Hunchback of Notre Dame

Cis gays, you just need to work on your attraction to transmen by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Because they tried oh so much but it doesn't work, duh!

exhibit #28484852 why actuallesbians is no longer for lesbians by MadLass in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 17 insightful - 5 fun17 insightful - 4 fun18 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao the dude who asks why people obsess over genitalia and not personality when dating.

I'm pretty sure these people never had sex in their lives, nor romantic relationships.

exhibit #28484852 why actuallesbians is no longer for lesbians by MadLass in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 15 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

So the key to erase gayness and become straight was pretending that our partner is male, got it 👍🏻

There used to be a word for us… by Susiesmum in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice article. Looking at the diagrams made me think how ridiculous the whole situation is. I mean, I already knew it's a stupid idea to revolutionize language because of a bunch of people, but when you see what the proportions are, you really wonder who's the real recipient.

Tra's / Trans actively deny biology because they know biology isn't on their side by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Feeeeeling male, of course

Who the hell talks like that?? by LasagnaRossa in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They all have anime avatars, a friend who uses another reddit app told me.

Who the hell talks like that?? by LasagnaRossa in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

True, and the "lesbians" in the comments are enthusiast about this detail.

BTW some of them guessed it because "she looks masculine as a kid". Hmm, sorry? I thought you can't assume any gender nowadays?

Inclusiveness Training by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

"Questioning" 😂

Tampax for grown arse men. by jet199 in itsafetish

[–]LasagnaRossa 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think this is satire

(Ranty) DAE feel almost-revulsion any time they hear the word "Privilege" anymore? by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've never liked the word privilege to begin with.

If you can cut a queue because of your status, if you're not required to pay taxes because of entity, then yes, you're privileged.

But if a minority has hard life I'm not privileged: they are oppressed.

Privilege is something that needs to get down. Respect is something that everyone needs to achieve.

...And ysterday was international pronouns day... lack of words. by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

BUt tHaTs DiFfFerEnT

More trans worshipping from r/Actuallesbians, from Ovarit. by EmptyCode in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 19 insightful - 5 fun19 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Good. Now remake the same meme with three actual people. I'm pretty sure the one in the center won't be cute and feminine as they hope.

In Norway, "misgendering" someone may soon be punishable with up to 3 years in prison. Even though it's easy to "misgender" because Norwegians can change their legal sex online. (And what about those speshal snowflakes the "gender-fluid"?) by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, what does even "being a man" mean at this point? Yeah, I'm a man then. With a vagina, uterus, tits and all, but I'm a man.

My opinion now counts, it must do, I'm a man!

When it comes to the Bathroom thing, what do you say about the Women who claim they have no problem with TIMs being in the restroom? by Kai_Decadence in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ooohhh I forgot that bathroom stalls are different in the United States! Here (Italy) everything is locked, there's no reason to be afraid. In fact my university had genderless bathrooms and we never had a problem with it.

Btw why are American stalls so see-through? What were they trying to accomplish?

When it comes to the Bathroom thing, what do you say about the Women who claim they have no problem with TIMs being in the restroom? by Kai_Decadence in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. I'm one of those women who don't mind, but if the majority has a problem with it, I would support them.

I just made a sub on reddit r/TRETwitter by cutenoobies in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice idea but it won't last. It goes against the cult.

A man in a blue wig & a dress claiming to be God broke into an Alabama TV station with a tire iron (maybe he can share a cell with the Antifa "Muslim woman" throwing bombs at Phoenix police?) by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I always wonder why we don't validate these people too. They identify with God? Well, it must be true lol

Oh so NOW words have a meaning 🙄 by LasagnaRossa in GenderCritical

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Odd how all these words have a true meaning unless we're talking about the definition of woman. THEN it doesn't mean what it used to mean but eVoLVed.

Reality really supports their cause in every way, doesn't it?

Why are you so obsessed with... by hailthegambler in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a classical tactic to shut the other party up. Religious people use the same catchphrase with atheists too: "[if God doesn't exist,] why are you so obsessed with Him?"

LGBallT: the Fandom-ization of Gender by spongebabthosepants in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hahaha yes, those quizzes are gold

Apparently my gender is female (sic) because I'm empathetic and I have fashion sense lol

Godspeed to /r/askgaybros by blahblahgcer in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 18 insightful - 5 fun18 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

When you're so far in the cult that you think that keeping out women and bisexual men from a gay group is gatekeeping LOL

The memes write themselves

Another reason i want to drop the T. click if you dare. by turtleduck23 in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Have you tried to click the link twice? Everytime I need to click, exit the page, and click again to make it work.

I'm not sure homosexuality works that way... by blackrainbow in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember that post and only expressed my disagreement with a downvote. Sadly anyone who goes against the narrative gets censored there :( not even bisexual can say they don't like girldick and boypussy, they are seen as traitors

Should’ve known better than to create a scenario in which readers are given the option of switching bodies with a stranger. Idiots like this one commented a few... by CinnamonFrenchToast in LGBDropTheT

[–]LasagnaRossa 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Point out the contradiction and watch them fumble lol.

I've always wondered if these people would still be okay if they got an ugly man/woman's body. Would they get "euphoria" regardless?