Its a school in Pakistan. It fucked me up, and now I want my revenge.

I never heard about that website, hacking of it won't make international news.

Is eating less meat ‘like taking 8m cars off road’?

Grains were never very nutritious. Eating grass is the last resort of any self-respecting hunter gatherer: "too much work, too little reward". What's worse, it's more environmentally demanding actually. From the same reason the people in desert or arctic areas (where the natural resources are really scarce) live from pasturage instead of agriculture. The greenhouse planting (as practiced by European countries) would be indeed possible even there - but it would also eliminate natural resources faster. The animals can concentrate proteins even from diluted plant sources, which would be solely ineffective to grow in an organized way. Do you still think, that eating of vegetables saves the nature and life environment all around us? Just think again - not only it exhausts water resources, steel and glass for greenhouses, but also most of this food is about transporting of ballast with low protein and energy value...

The taxation of meat is another greedy and imbecile proposal of technocrats, who are "ignoring", that meat is way more concentrated source of proteins than plants. The food isn't just about calories. For instance, for production of rice it's required 2552 m³ of water/ ton rice, whereas for production of one ton of poultry 3809 m³ of water is required. Therefore the production of poultry may sound like an ineffective waste of resources for someone - but the content of proteins in rice is ten times lower than in chicken meat and it consumes more water (and fertilizers) per mass unit of protein than the farming of poultry. The environmentalism has not so simple and straightforward math, as many its proponents (who are often silent lobbyist of various industrial groups - just different ones than the meat eaters) would like to see it.