Secession is inevitable - Part 2 by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The economic arguments against the Ethnostate always seem to imply we could never assign a monetary value to independence. How much of my real income to I have to give up to get the Ethnostate? 25%? 50%? Either way that's reasonable (for me) if it comes to that

We move 70% of goods by truck in the US that would no longer be flowing in and out of that former state most likely.

I don't think an economic embargo is that likely. Almost all corporations today are multinational (and multistate). Ideally, when the US breaks up, it will simultaneously break up into several successor states (say, 10) who will have a mutual interest in not engaging in trade wars, etc. In any case we can assume that there will some economic and political drawbacks (at first anyways) - but, these are acceptable (within reason) assuming the main goal is achieved

Assuming the Federal Govt would allow succession to happen in the first place.

The Federal government is made up of the states though. And if West Coast liberals and southern republican all want to secede, why are they going to fight eachother? The military (for now) is also largely made up of conservative whites. Who will probably not fight white breakaway state, and many would defect.

This is all worth its own post tho

Secession is inevitable - Part 2 by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Plan I showed was hopeful to cut a path through Oregon - but you don't "need" ports (e.g. Switzerland). If Cascadia wants to charge us tariffs then whatever, we can negotiate - but the main point of that vid is that secession is practically possible, not that this.particular plan was desirable in absolutely every way

Shocking poll finds many Americans now want to secede from the United States by Drewski in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Good

The only major city in the world where housing prices are not soaring is Tokyo by tratini in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They also built like crazy a few decades ago (remember the bridge to nowhere?)

I think that was China/NK

Some positive trends by DisastrousDepth14 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Redbridge Labour commissioned a furry rainbow monkey with a huge dildo and exposed anus to dance in front of children as part of a reading project at libraries this summer by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

National Justice article makes my blood boil. Every fucking time

Just activated flairs if anyone gives a shit😎👍 by Markimus in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Search for "show my flair"

Just activated flairs if anyone gives a shit😎👍 by Markimus in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Does mine work for anyone or no

Anarcho-feminists storm Austrian newspaper over ‘racist’ reporting in high-profile teen gang-rape & murder case by BiglyBased in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

anarcho-feminists

I feel like feminism wouldn't do so well in an actually anarchist society

Most Americans Believe Someone Other than Biden Is Running the Show by scrubking in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Prime Minister Klain most likely holding the leash. Jewish Chief of staff and has been in positions under Clinton and Obama

DebateAltRight banned me, and this was my response by socks in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Dog breeds are notoriously inbred. Humans are not. Crossbreeding dog breeds can mitigate duplicates of many of the harmful recessive alleles present in either breed. This is not the case for major human races. So it's not a relevant analogy

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why would you choose a handle using the name and alma mater of some random (real) indian person if it isn't you? Why would you choose your own name and info if it was you? I don't know which is weirder

Regardless, your posts on GLR's grandchildren, "self-control" of Cameroonian vs. German children (second time you've posted this), hyperbolistic titles like:

"Study finds that "Whites are more likely to assault and use weapons against Blacks and Hispanics than Blacks and Hispanics are to assault or use weapons against Whites?!?!"

etc. - these are posts made in bad faith with cherry-picked, weak sources. I don't care who you were or who are pretending to be, but you don't look like a legit poster either way

What do you think was Pence's game on the 6th? by Republican58 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

His plan was to do absolutely nothing, and that was what he did. Same with Trump

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what about the nature article? Isn't it the most up to date research

I don't know, and I don't have time to look. Offspring have been getting taller each generation for awhile now, there are probably a lot of conflating factors. The differences probably aren't very big or practical anyways

what about ruqqus are you referring to?

You and I both know that you are a disingenuous concern troll, and you probably aren't fooling anyone else

btw this is me

Is this also you?

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So your response is to post insults

If you come in here firing ad hominem shots across the bow about "genocide" don't be surprised if you get hit back

and links to obviously racist assholes?

Someone says or researches something the system doesn't like -> they are branded a "racist" -> they are now wrong because they are "racist"

Does it ever occur to you how convenient that is? Just call them a "heretic" or a "witch" and burn them at the stake at this point

And anyone who thinks 'anyways' is a word

It is

Moreover, IQ is only one measurement of intelligence

IQ tests can measure a variety of things including verbal, visual-spatial, and other kinds of intelligence. "g", or the general intelligence factor, is really what we care about because it has most all of the predictive power of IQ tests (for things like income, educational attainment, etc.) Most IQ tests report the aggregate IQ score of these different batteries of tests, and for most practical purposes IQ ≈ g

of which there are other measures.

Not really. At least, not tests that are useful in predicting anything we care about. There is just one g (and still just one g)

And regarding the scientific literature on miscegenation and consanguinity, one merely has to search for it, or check PubMed.

You should present the evidence for the claims you make, as we do. Miscegenation usually just results in an average of traits for both races. (1000.5) + (850.5) = 92.5 IQ for black/white offspring. Same goes for other traits. If you have something else then find it and actually present it in context

Watson, that colonialist asshole is known by scientists to be wrong about his claims about race; which is why the fucker had to apologize:

No - he had to apologize because people didn't like what he said, not because he was "wrong."

It's mystifying how people like you will turn a blind eye to this. Every society has its taboos. Globohomo-judeo neoliberalism requires that race not exist (if your white and on the defensive, at least) and white people be exploited. If you have evidence to the contrary and speak out about it you get ostracized, demonized, and attacked. It's like criticizing communism in the Soviet Union.

Moreover, Watson refers to Africans, not necessarily mixed race people

It is obviously implied that since Watson believes Africans have a lower level of intelligence due to genes, then he would also believe that mix-raced black/white people would have lower IQs than full-white people

who do tend to be smarter, more attractive, more physically capable, and more interesting, taller, and with bigger dicks

Lol - "MUH DICK!!!" [citation needed] for every one of these outlandish claims.

Intelligence is not the only value of a human being

No one said it was. It's just a trait that matters a lot for socioeconomic outcomes

and if it were, mixed race people are not dumber than others, by any standard of research.

Wrong. How many times do we have to do this?. Of course, it depends on the races involved and what parent race you are comparing to

Those who argue against this tend to favor abuses of all kinds against non-white people

Ignoring your appeal to a motive, it is true that any differences in racial socioeconomic outcomes are already used as by leftists and other anti-whites as an excuse to exploit whites. "White supremacy" is to blame for why blacks do bad in schools, commit more crimes, and have less money - and no evidence ever has to be presented for this magical force. So now we need affirmative action, welfare, anti-white propaganda everywhere, etc.

So whatever you fallaciously accuse us of presenting this evidence for, the current system is already using no evidence at all to justify exploiting us right now in the present

It's stupid, backward, and hateful.

Emotional reasoning. The system obviously hates white people, so why don't you go to the media and tell them to stop all their hateful bigotry? Maybe we'd be more interested in not talking about race and IQ if we weren't already demonized by every institution in this society

Look also at the centuries of poorer economic conditions

Why are places like Africa almost universally shitty, but nations like China or South Korea (who were just as poor or poorer at the start of the 20th century) doing so well? What about Haiti? Why are the correlations between racial economic outcomes and racial IQs so consistent across countries and time? Maybe you have causality reversed?

of the people who are being criticized as having lower IQ.

Your choice of the word "criticized" belies your foundation of emotional reasoning. It is just a statement of fact that certain groups are more or less intelligent than others, and this has important implications in a multiracial society (esp. one where we share public resources and institutions).

There are so many factors to consider, other than DNA.

These have been considered. For decades. That's why heritability (genetic portion) is estimated at 80% in western countries (yes, for all races)

you won't see a significant gap in intelligence in mixed-race children:

Racial gaps are smaller in childhood and heritability is lower. This is the Wilson effect, which has been known for 50 years

It's extremely low-effort to conduct a google search and rage post a bunch of shitty left-leaning links that you've never read and give no context to. Foxy already took a shot at some of these and some are duplicates so I'll only respond to a few (or you can actually put these in context)

Eyferth_study

Ahh a classic study and one of my favorite egalitarian copes. Lots of problems with it

First, the US Army (and almost certainly the french army, don't know for sure) employed IQ tests in WWI. 90 was the minimum for the US, so already with blacks at mean 85 we are getting an "elite" sample of blacks as fathers. So, offspring IQ will be higher than what we would typically assume. Second, the mean age of the children in this study is 10, and we already discussed the Wilson effect, so this is inappropriate to extrapolate onto the adult population. Third, the most strikingly anomalous thing about this study is the inexplicably low IQ of the white girls in the study (93?) which of course, is the singular category where mixed-race children did better. Also, the mixed race children all score below 100, so the eyferth results don't even deviate significantly from the hereditarian hypothesis.

Actually, I think I'm done here. Google searches? Qoura? DailyMail? Come on.

You strike me as a "true believer" - someone who literally takes anything the system has presented to them - whether its a "fact" or a moral foundation - as "true", and everything else is like heresy, or a sin. Therefore, it must be wrong.

It's obvious you don't know a lot about intelligence testing, and we have seen copes on this topic hundreds of times. Here's a post I made that you can check out to start

If you really want to discuss these links, then actually read them and present them in a post in context (notice how I do that with all of my links)

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The old and unscientific claim that miscegenation is in any way problematic has been claimed many times and debunked in every instance

Once again you just lie out your ass and provide no evidence for the things you say

There are no biologists or geneticists on Saidit who will have any scientific arguments against miscegenation

Another lie. James Watson, who literally discovered DNA, disagrees:

James D. Watson, 79, co-discoverer of the DNA helix and winner of the 1962 Nobel Prize in medicine, told the Sunday Times of London that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours — whereas all the testing says not really."

It's a stupid appeal to credentialism anyways. You don't need to be a biologist or a geneticist to understand the basics of inheritance. Humans have been selectively breeding animals (and, themselves) for thousands of years without ever knowing what a "gene" was

because these arguments are invalid

How are they "invalid?" IQ and other psychological traits are all highly heritable and are not the same between racial groups. The end

Given the treatment of Watson and other experts who have pointed these things out, is it really any wonder why hordes of geneticists and biologists don't come out to tell society that their sacred taboos and beliefs about race aren't true?

arguments against miscegenation are used by those who want to aparthied and/or genocide of all non-white people

Pathetic ad-hominem and appeal to a motive. White people being marginalized and demonized by every institution as our homelands are invaded by others, and our incomes repossessed to pay for their gibs. Yet, you have the gall to make the claim that we are the ones who want genocide.

You are wrong about race, wrong about inheritance, and wrong about what we want. Ultimately, you are an extremely uninformed and shameless apologist for a very stupid (and evil) utopian project built on the backs of white people, which is doomed to fail eventually - no matter how much you parrot unsubstantiated NPC talking points on this website

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Pop science is globohomo propaganda and your first article at least is written by a typical blue check liberal woman (who might be Jewish, can't tell)

AltHype on "Race Mixing". Many studies there. ​No beneficial effects and the IQs of mixed-race children fall in-between the races of their parents (on average). Mixed race marriages also seem to suffer more problems

On height I've never seen anything that I can remember but it's probably BS. Whites in the US are very slightly taller than blacks on average, and also have higher IQs, despite being less "diverse" genetically (and have a much greater variation in phenotypes - blonde hair, blues eyes, etc.) Benefits of "genetic diversity" are just BS - unless you're talking about seriously small gene pools, which doesn't apply to 500M Europeans

if a Swede and a Somalian breed, the kid will be smarter!?!

No ((Lynn, 2006) and you knew that

Beyond the problems with IQ and the heritability of political views and criminal behavior, another problem with race-mixing is that it destroys our social cohesion and ability to action ourselves politically. Whites are 60% of the US population, yet we are demonized relentlessly by the MSM and branded as the #1 terror threat by our own government. What's going to happen when we are 50%? 40%

I am against race mixing but,

I remember you from Ruqqus. Reminder that a misrepresentation of your views is a violation of rule 3.

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The dysgenics implication has been known for awhile.. Richard Lynn has a whole book on it and Last recently published something on that too

Basically all evidence shows the entire "liberal" multiracial utopian project is going to end in disaster

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Their example would only make sense..

To try and make sense of leftism is to fundamentally misunderstand it. It's like religion or psychological coping mechanism, it doesn't require consistency

Read Ted, at least 6-32. Don't want to fill up the comments section with a wall of text

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is the purpose of schools & degrees, if intelligence was only "subjective"? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The leftish presupposition is that all people are equally able to be intelligent if trained/educated properly. Or at least, all races are equally capable. Therefore we must equalize or attempt to equalize educational attainment between groups

Leftists dislike IQ tests because they suggest that people can be classified as superior/inferior to others. This causes them emotional anguish due to their oversocialization and low self-esteem. They dismiss IQ tests as illegitimate because they are morally repugnant, not because they have a good rational reason for doing it (but theyll try to make up reasons to pretend their rationale isn't just emotive)

18 ...More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

Claim: Crime plummeted as America browned by tantamle in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand that since the 1970s or so, crime and violent crime has decreased sharply

I'm not sure if that's true, but in any case it was probably higher during the crack epidemic of the 1980s. Regardless

If blacks and Hispanics commit crime at higher rates per capita

This is just a fact [1], [2], [3]

Woke leftist culture imported from US is ‘racialising’ France, causing splits in society and holding back ethnic minorities, says President Macron by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

gullible, low-IQ, brown socialists who blame imaginary problems on their betters

Yeah no.. not really. It's the the gullible white people falling in line for this shit that is the real problem. And the tribe of people controlling the media making them that way

What are your thoughts on Rush Limbaugh's 2009 cpac speech? by Republican58 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're really committed to this parody account aren't you

CNN, MSNBC's ratings collapse due to 'serious credibility problem' covering Biden, experts say by P-38lightning in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just turn off the jewtube

US mainstream media exists for the sole purpose of making white people insane

Nietzsche on a pure European race and culture by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is this even a practical problem?

Tucker Carlson Confirms NSA is Spying on Him by Tarrock in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Doesn't the NSA spy on everyone?

MSNBC OUTRAGED By 'Defund The Military' by EndlessSunflowers in conspiracy

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

mainstream media is controlled by the Military Industrial Complex

Hmmm not quite

What are your thoughts on this article describing Trump's rally and his commitment to retaking America? by Republican58 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Trump is our era's Julius Caeser or JFK

LOL. Trump is a fat buttgoy charlatan who was never sincere about what he said, but is somehow able to continue his grift despite his incompetence and betrayal because there are somehow still conservatards out there dumb enough to support him. Trump serves Jews, not you, never did.

Get a grip. The shilling doesn't work here

Jewish woman writes doctoral thesis on why US justice system is racist against blacks, and then is stabbed to death by blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

but the nature/nurture argument normally results in overwhelming evidence that nurture (behaviour) is the primary influence on one's activities

No. Intelligence is 0.8 heritable in western countries and virtually all psychological traits are highly heritable. This is the "iron law" of heritability

We keep hearing about subversive left wing think-tanks. Do we have think-tanks of our own to strengthen and propound our ideology? by Oingo in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The main reason there isn't is because associating with far-right ideas and institutions basically brands you as an evil heretic who needs to be ostracized from society. If you are employed by one of these institution, or donate money/time to them, then you effectively end your career. The second reason is that most of our work has already been done - race and IQ has already been exhausted by the Pioneer Fund, Jewish influence effectively cataloged by NPI, Richard Lynn, CoC, and other autodidacts, and races consuming welfare documented by Center for immigration Studies, among others

Basically, there's not a whole lot of work to be done and lots of incentives against doing more

We keep hearing about subversive left wing think-tanks. Do we have think-tanks of our own to strengthen and propound our ideology? by Oingo in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The difficulty as always is funding

And Jewish lawsuits / economic embargos

What do you think of my views? by EdLimonovFan in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You sound like a vargish communist for whites. Fine to me, not religious and not gonna split hairs over trivial economic differences as long as you're pro-white. While we're under ZOG, neither of us get anything, so we're definitely on the same team

Show support for your political party with user flairs by AXXA in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. Fine to me, not sure if they have a color or not

Show support for your political party with user flairs by AXXA in politics

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Can you add "Dissident Right" flair? Or maybe NJP

Slavs aren't white. by MisterQ in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Aryan

one of us

Try again. No one here believes in Nazi anthro-mythology that was discredited, even in it's own time

Go around correcting people IRL that Slavs actually aren't "white" and so shouldn't be subjected to media "white guilt" propaganda or "anti-discrimination" laws b/c they are so different.

Was Watergate no big deal? by la_cues in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

isn't spying in this way a dishonest and crooked act?

I already said that?

The first time it happens

But it wasn't the first time. At least, not the first time presidents have done reprehensible things

Was Watergate no big deal? by la_cues in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly, I don't think it was. At least not compared to anything subsequent presidents have done. Obama illegally spied on Trump's presidential campaign and this isn't even talked about. Nothing has happened or will happen to him for it. Then when you consider all the other heinous things presidents have done, Watergate just doesn't seem like a big deal at all. Illegal/immoral, sure, but just not that bad in the grand scheme of things. But it was apparently so bad at the time that Nixon willingly resigned over it - despite being one of the most popular presidents up until that point

How to avoid /s/debatealtright by fschmidt in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

this shabbat

Lel

How to avoid /s/debatealtright by fschmidt in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

t. Pajeet

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wait wtf hahaha how did they do that ??

What ya doing dog? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No worries dude

How to avoid /s/debatealtright by fschmidt in SaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Haha

I know you're no fan, fschmidt. Glad you can shut the bad voices out for your own sanity

What ya doing dog? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Given that were on s/All now I'm gonna remove this. Let's keep it to news/debate, there's other places to post this

Top U.S General Defends Critical Race Theory. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah that's true. I bet 60% would defect if shit ever went down.

Two Cheers for Charles Murray, Jared Taylor. A bit of a misleading title, he actually thinks he's cucking out with his latest book. by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

JF talked about Murray the other day. I agree that he is increasingly irrelevant and out-of-touch. He just wrote a book a year or two ago where he said we need to abandon the concept of race entirely or something. Taylor seems on-point here

Top U.S General Defends Critical Race Theory. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"The military is on our side"

The final cope. Top military officials are basically spineless politicians. They will bend the knee to the ZOG or be cast out

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe. In any case, solid ammo against the ruling class. We never got the truth on Epstein either

John McAfee found dead, likely offed by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[S] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Epstein was blatant as hell too. They don't care about subtlety anymore - but apparently, they don't need to

McAfee is also a huge media troll, so I almost want to withold judgement until we know for sure this isn't a stunt

Is there a blackpilled version of the right wing? by Basghetti in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Blackpilled" means to be nihilistic or pessimistic to the point of hopelessness or disengagement. This can have different meanings depending on the context.

Obviously we are "blackpilled" on the prospect of democratic change under the current (Jewish) political system. But we aren't "blackpilled" in other ways (e.g. long-term survival of white people)

"Blackpilled" (Devon Stack) is a YouTuber/personality on our side

Does this mean that those with right wing views that are blackpilled are ousted from their groups

I don't understand what you mean. If you're truly "blackpilled," then you just drop out of whatever youre doing or stop caring

Hey Right-Wingers, Good to Be Back by Richard_Parker in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hmm, interesting. Could've been one of us altering the automod config too, not sure

Redpill material on JQ by RISHABHJAINUVA in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Where do you want to start? Memes? Literature? Topics? You can find shit all over /pol/ , 4chan generally, here, Culture of Critique, etc.

Here's some starting material:

Sean Last - The Jewish Question: an Empirical Examination

AltHype - A Celebration of the Jewish People (Bitchute)

Hey Right-Wingers, Good to Be Back by Richard_Parker in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum[M] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your post was auto-removed but I don't know why

Facebook Gives Ben Shapiro 'Shadow-Boost' To Make More Users See His Content - Report - National File by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Censorial Facebook promoting "right-wing" content? Why?

This collusion can only be explained by the Jewish/Zionist connection. Thats why stories like these are so important to point out to normiecons who refuse to acknowledge the Jewish media conspiracy

Hunter Biden's amazing, extraordinary, sublime, unprecedented art talent has his paintings selling for $500,000 a pop by auch999 in corruption

[–]cisheteroscum 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Modern art has long been a money-laundering scheme for the elites. No surprise here

Which VPN Providers Really Take Privacy Seriously in 2021? by panzerF in privacy

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No - they just see the VPN address

Blacks are our allies by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The diversity of views among them is large

Not really. Youve got the majority pro-black, anti-white essentially racial-nationalist bloc of them and a few token conservative blacks. Blacks vote 90% democrat

That being said, there have been lukewarm relationships between white and (actual) black nationalists in the past, given common goals

Did Mike "Enoch" really say: "If you're going to let in a mixed Jewish person, they really have to have done something to earn it. And I think that in my case, I did." by Jesus in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

We've done this at length before. I don't know why otherwise well-meaning posters (esp. christian-far-right types, sorry) are still clinging to this. The conversation is over, it's like you just hate what is popular. You guys have clearly never listened to an episode of TDS, they name Jews every episode.

Communist CHINESE state press DISGUSTING ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-CHRISTIAN cartoon by purelingot in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is this a joke? It's not even offensive. We get much worse from jewish-owned western media every day

Also I don't see Israel represented here

Is there an equivalent to r/rant or any related relationship venting sub on here? by Ash in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I think this is a joke ?

haha when did Ryan got this based? by FoxySDT in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can't find the tweet on Twitter itself

What is America’s cause in the world? by video2 in whatever

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Israel

Delhi Escorts by Pooja21 in WorldNews

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Pooja Escorts - find us on you local designated shitting-street"

Why Are Jews Leading The Alt-Right & 'White' Nationalist Movements? by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No I know what clip you're talking about. It's taken out of context. He even took a genetic test to prove he isn't

Have any of you guys listened to even a single episode of TDS? It's obvious Enoch is not Jewish

Why Are Jews Leading The Alt-Right & 'White' Nationalist Movements? by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Enoch is also not Jewish. It's been refuted for years

No mention of Jared Taylor, Greg Johnson, or any of the other guys associated with TRS like Striker, Sven, Jazzhands or Allsup.

I have never heard Molyneux was Jewish tho, highly skeptical of that one

Should I make a new forum site for debate? by TheAmeliaMay in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Should I make a new forum site for debate?

Well, maybe, but

and controversies like s/debatealtright being removed from s/all

Relax. This cropped up randomly, we've been off /all for like four months already

but with the site randomly going down, the head admin nowhere to be found

This is the main problem

I could get it online for $18.28, and just pay $3.11 a month for a very basic server

If it's really that cheap, and I wanted to do it, I would just front it for free. Why worry about revenue? I drop $100 at the bar every weekend

Definition of White People by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Definition of White People by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is actually true but not a lot of people know this and it's too much of a pain to substantiate. It seems incredulous and doesn't usually help the point anyways. It's just easier to say non-Europeans aren't white

Also the Vandals had a short-lived empire in North Africa

Definition of White People by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They intermarried with white gentiles (mostly women) and gained a higher IQ owing to positive and negative discrimination. For example their chosen professions (banking, trading) and persecution/pogroms. Or so the theory goes

See Cochran and Harpending's The Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence for more

Any1 have redpilled youtube documentaries? by lolikon69 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's depressing. The fact whites can't get an act together on the tech front is rather blackpilling

ARCHIVED REDDIT POST: My wife is leaving me and I support her by crackerjack in whatever

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fake and gay

Hahaha this sub is great. Like MDE-tier

Definition of White People by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ashkenazi

These are the only ones we really ever care about. They are basically half-semitic and half-european genetically speaking

Any1 have redpilled youtube documentaries? by lolikon69 in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Odysee which hilariously is also owned by Two Zionist Jews

Noo I thought it was Chinese?

Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins? by Dragonerne in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I understand. Like I said elsewhere - we like SaidIt, we want to stay - but we know we are a dominant user base that would affect the front page under normal conditions. If we need to be de-facto censored for the benefit of the site, then that's OK - but I want magnora to be honest about that and we'd like to have specific rules or something such that we can have our forum but also have certain posts visible to non-Alt-Right people so they can share their opinions too

The mistake that magnora made was the accusation of intent on our part in making SaidIt look like a specifically alt-right site. There is no such conspiracy, we simply didn't do anything wrong.

Afrocentrists always lie: Snopes.com surprisingly wrote an entire article debunking "Life Without Black People", a famous "black inventions" hoax by YORAMRW in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't read and posted that reflexively. Snopes as a "fact-checker" has been notoriously biased/wrong. Good examples are the article on Silverstein buying insurance for terrorism before 9/11 and the idea that 13/50 being "wrong" because blacks are 12.5% of the population and commit 53% of violent crimes. I'll edit my comment I guess lol

Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins? by Dragonerne in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yall are originally from Reddit, right?

Yes. All mods and most users, at least

I ain't got no authority

I know, I was just speaking hypothetically

Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins? by Dragonerne in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just like anyone else, we have no idea wtf is going on with magnora. I don't know how he can "jump ship" and SaidIt can still be a thing, considering he pays the bills. But still can't explain why he hasn't showed up in a month either

the mods on DAR decided that

Send_nasty_stuff just noticed it was as easy as checking a box to put us on /all. He checked the box to include us, and made a post about it. There wasn't much of a consultation with other mods. When fred_red_beans removed us again, we all agreed to just not do anything and leave it as it was.

Basically a random event with little co-ordination

Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins? by Dragonerne in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Glad, thanks for saying so.

We've been around the block enough to know we will be censored no matter what eventually. So it's not something we aren't used to. But, frankly, we like SaidIt. We want to stay and want to help improve it. But we also like non-alt-right visitors. If we need to change rules or something to get others into the conversation then we are open to that

Definition of White People by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Well they basically are (genetically) - just a particularly hostile and tribalistic brand of whites that screw other whites over. Like a relative you have to disown

Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins? by Dragonerne in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

FTR, magnora literally said

I regularly see news items posted in the sub that have nothing to do with debating or alt-right, things that could easily be posted in /s/news instead. It seems there is an effort to make sure this site is framed as an alt-right site, by making sure this sub is on the front page regularly, and I don't want that for saidit because it undermines the quality of the website.

Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins? by Dragonerne in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's not it. It's a matter of domination by numbers. If every other post is from one large sub then it's dominating the front page.

I think we're saying the same thing. But as I said, our official cause for removal was not stated in such straightforward terms. I would just appreciate the honesty

I also hate it when people are lazy and only post in /s/conspiracy or /s/politics when their posts can easily fit in more specific topical subs.

Actually I agree that that is a valid criticism of SaidIt, and of our sub in particular. On Reddit, we were used to being quarantined and being a smaller community (relative to the overall size of reddit) so people posted directly to the sub to get our takes on whatever was happening. People still do this as if that is the case, when posts probably belong elsewhere on saidit. We should be making a bigger effort to branch out into other subs (but would magnora even want that?)

Breaking News: U.S Government Finds No Evidence of Alien UFOs, but can't explain it either. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Idc I'm saying that it's being hyped-up by the media in the last few weeks to distract from israel/jews

Breaking News: U.S Government Finds No Evidence of Alien UFOs, but can't explain it either. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm saying the Jewish media/deep state is hyping up UFOs now to distract from Israel

Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins? by Dragonerne in AskSaidIt

[–]cisheteroscum 20 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

As a moderator of the sub in question, it's obvious we are kept off s/all because magnora does not want SaidIt to appear to be an alt-right site. He found a bad excuse to take use off, but the reality is all of these "free-speech" alternatives eventually get overrun by dissident-right types because we are the most censored. So, it's sort of a weird balance we have to strike where we need a home but are also censored by the pro-"free-speech" alternatives we migrate to.

I don't really blame magnora for taking us off - I just wish him and the other admins would be more honest about what they're doing. Or give us some deal with more stringent rules, whatever. We like getting visitors who aren't alt-right already