LOL. Let's see how many lies are in this speech. I'll just point out the ones that I know for a fact.

That’s when America’s compound came under attack. Along with three of his colleagues, Chris was killed in the city that he helped to save.

Obama deliberately let them die. Rescue was ready to go but told to stand down. Turns out, they were smuggling Libyan weapons to Syria to fuel the civil war there and ol' Chris got in the way.

We insisted on change in Egypt, because our support for democracy ultimately put us on the side of the people.

"Last year I arrived early for a lunch address by Gen. Michael Hayden, who ran the National Security Agency and later the Central Intelligence Agency in the George W. Bush administration. Hayden was already there, and glad to chat. The conversation turned to Egypt, and I asked Hayden why the Republican mainstream had embraced the Muslim Brotherhood rather than the military government of President al-Sisi, an American-trained soldier who espoused a reformed Islam that would repudiate terrorism. "We were sorry that [Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohamed] Morsi was overthrown" in July 2013, Hayden explained. "We wanted to see what would happen when the Muslim Brotherhood had to take responsibility for picking up the garbage."

"General," I remonstrated, "when Morsi was overthrown, Egypt had three weeks of wheat supplies on hand. The country was on the brink of starvation!"

"I guess that experiment would have been tough on the ordinary Egyptian," Hayden replied, without a hint of irony."

http://www.atimes.com/trump-lacks-experience-but-his-detractors-lack-common-sense/

Just look at these sociopathic elites playing with the lives of millions, just so they can see what will happen. It's disgusting on a level I can't even express.

We supported a transition of leadership in Yemen, because the interests of the people were no longer being served by a corrupt status quo.

The shitshow in Yemen is now a genocide, pursued by US ally Saudi Arabia. Thanks Obama!

We intervened in Libya alongside a broad coalition, and with the mandate of the United Nations Security Council, because we had the ability to stop the slaughter of innocents, and because we believed that the aspirations of the people were more powerful than a tyrant.

Libya now has seen the re-emergence of literal slave markets and nothing but tyranny ever since. I never thought anyone could make me defend Khadaffy...but I'll be damned. The man kept Libya running without slave markets. He even had socialism! That's right, nobody in prewar Libya ever went hungry.

And as we meet here, we again declare that the regime of Bashar al-Assad must come to an end so that the suffering of the Syrian people can stop and a new dawn can begin.

Meddling in a civil war nobody asked for. Years later, the war is still going, the military-industrial complex blocked an attempt by the elected government to end the war, and nobody even knows what our objective is. I don't know and neither do you.

I am convinced that ultimately government of the people, by the people, and for the people is more likely to bring about the stability, prosperity, and individual opportunity that serve as a basis for peace in our world.

You can tell this was written before Brexit and Trump destroyed the legitimacy democracy had among elites.

That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.

Yup, that's what they blamed the embassy attack in Libya on. It had nothing to do with it.

I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. And the answer is enshrined in our laws: Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.

LOL this is obviously before Youtube started banning anyone to the right of Mao Zedong. It turned out, the way around the first amendment was to have private companies own the public square. Thus, no FA violations. Problem solved! Such a video would be taken down in hours today.

We do not do so because we support hateful speech, but because our founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views and practice their own faith may be threatened.

Another lie. That whole "I'm defending my own speech by defending the speech of scoundrels" has been decisively and irredeemably refuted.

strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression; it is more speech -- the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect.

Free speech is just a code word for hate speech. The only people who defend free speech are racists.

the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete.

Nope! Turns out, Youtube/Google/Twitter can do that just fine.

There's no video that justifies an attack on an embassy.

There's that lie again about the video provoking the embassy attack.

Just as we cannot solve every problem in the world, the United States has not and will not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic transitions abroad.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHA....oh my sides. I can't believe Obama, of all people, said that with a straight face. Obama constantly meddled in other nation's elections. Remember when he tried to alter the result of Brexit?

Obama's Meddling in Foreign Elections: Six Examples

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

He's talking about the video again. Boy, he sure got a lot of mileage out of that lie.

It’s time to heed the words of Gandhi: "Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit."

Gandhi the child molester.

We’ve begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA...oh, another big lie. Obama sure was the master of those, wasn't he? Trump tried to end the war only to be overruled by the unelected government, so-called deep state.

And later today, I will discuss our efforts to combat the scourge of human trafficking.

Destroying Libya increased human trafficking a hundredfold.

I could have gone on for much longer, but I think that's quite enough for one post.

conquest of the world

The Germans never had "conquest of the world" as a war aim. The goal was to conquer the food-producing areas of the Soviet Union, so that Germany could not be starved out like it was in WWI.

It was war propaganda that the Germans wanted to take over the world. I remember watching a newsreel that had the Germans jumping from Algeria over the Atlantic into the Caribbean and then Washington DC - laughable. But that's what they did to scare the shit out of Americans so they'd volunteer to fight in the war.

Of course it's fiction? But it's a fictional rendition of events that happened many, many times in the far left dominated country. It's a stand-in for any number of real cases that can be easily found.

I sure wish he'd quit stalking and harassing me. :( I've never had an internet stalker before, and I can see why people aren't fans.