Interacial relationships are less stable by Fourth_stage in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Asian women are not that desirable to anyone besides low-value white men.

9/10 times I see a white man with an Asian chick, he's pretty old, really ugly or a geek/nerd. Men that attractive white women don't give the time of day to.

I don't think I've ever seen a Chad with an Asian long-term girlfriend/wife. They're usually with hot white women. Think Tom Brady and Gisele Bundchen. In fact, I've seen Chads with hot Latinas and mulatto women too, never Asians.

Do you have non-white friends? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. I used to years ago but drifted away from them.

To be honest, I wouldn't have non-white friends now.

None of my white friends know my full beliefs. They know a small gist of them, i.e. that I'm into 'alternative' politics and I'm not left-wing, but they don't know my beliefs on things like race. Most are liberal normies. I have one friend who is 'alt-lite' (she watches the likes of Sargon of Akkad) and actually shocked me once when she told me she doubts the Holocaust narrative, but she's still bluepilled on race.

Conservatives in the Us have a lot of guns, but do they have ammo? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It doesn't matter how many firearms or how much ammo they have.

The vast majority of American right-wingers are big-mouthed LARPers who would never fire their weapons in anger. They would surrender to the first tranny fed who came around and asked them 'politely' to hand over their weapons and then whine about how unfair and hypocritical it was.

I've long suspected it but the events of 2020 and 1/6 have basically confirmed that the 2A is nothing but a LARP.

I never want to hear an American conservative or even WN tell me how they "wouldn't put up with raghead terrorists/Paki rapists/whatever unlike those disarmed Europeans (etc), because we have guns" ... no dude, you would. Just like when you do nothing when Tyrone rapes and murders your sisters and dumps her behind a Taco Bell.

What's the difference between alt right and alt lite? by Funkopop in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These distinctions don't really exist anymore. They're from 2014-2017ish.

The 'Alt-Lite' has been assimilated into mainstream conservatism in the US and some other countries, or they're at least adjacent to it. Certainly during the Trump era.

The 'Alt-Right' broadly describes people who are racialists, white nationalists and JQ-pilled, but there's no unified movement anymore. It's mainly groups and cliques who differ significantly on ideology. The guys at The Right Stuff/National Justice Party like Mike Enoch, James Allsup, and Eric Striker are not on the same page as the NPI/Radix people (e.g. Richard Spencer, Josh Neal) who are clearly not on the same page as the Red Ice people.

Nick Fuentes and the America First are a somewhat different animal again. They're paleocons who are (imo foolishly) hoping to take over the GOP. They're anti-Zionist and JQ-pilled Christians, and Nick Fuentes wants a "white supermajority" in America, but they have a weird non-white following.

Nick also seems to have clout with alt-liters like Milo Yiannopoulos (a known FBI and ADL informant). They hung out together and Milo apparently designed his website. Milo has openly admitted he sees Nick's followers as fertile ground to subvert, saying they need to shut up about Jews and race and recognise the problem Islam faces to America.

What's the difference between alt right and alt lite? by Funkopop in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The United States is not a real nation.

It's a giant economic zone/empire based on liberal values.

You're being slandered in this site by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That site would be somewhat accurate... if it was still 2016/2017.

I've noticed that a lot of outsiders who talk about the Alt-Right still imagine it's still the Trump meme wars. Lots have changed since then.

There arguably isn't an "Alt-Right" anymore.

What direction do you think the Republicans are going to go in 2024? What do you hope will happen? by MATKINS in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tucker Carlson could definitely do well. His show on Fox News is one of the most popular in American MSM, I think his viewership is an average of about 4-5 million, so he's got plenty of name/face recognition. He's relatively based (as far as an MSM figure can be, I know he says cringe shit too) from everything I've seen and read about him. He lacks the bombastic 'larger than life' personality of Trump, but despite that, I think he could definitely recreate something akin to MAGA (for better or worse) and get 'memed' into office.

I think he denied that he'd run when speculation mounted about that a few months ago, but who knows what will unfold in the next 4 years.

Baked Alaska Arrested by weasel in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There were blips of censorship then but the backlash against the Alt-Right really kicked into gear after Charlottesville, IMO. That's when shitloads of people got deplatformed. Websites like Stormfront got dropped by their domain, social media accounts went bye bye, payment processors bailed, etc, hell, I'm an anonymous no one in the movement, and I lost my Yahoo account for shit I wrote on Yahoo Answers, lol.

That's when schisms happened in the whole "DR." Alt-Lite grifters threw the Alt-Right under the bus (Paul Joseph Watson made a video condemning Richard Spencer and bragging about how popular he was compared to us), Nick Fuentes and his AmNat boys drifted off in another direction, and the Alt-Right became infested with infighting and disillusionment.

I remember Heilgate.. it was the first time I'd learned who Spencer even was (I've been redpilled since 2013). Millennial Woes was there and got doxxed shortly afterwards. From the way he describes it, there were agent provocateurs who broke out into Roman salutes and there was only like 5 of them, most of the people there did not not (and contrary to popular belief, Spencer didn't either, he raised a toast). I think that was a set up.

Baked Alaska Arrested by weasel in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I never watched any of his content but I'm pretty sure he was involved in the YouTube "Alt Right vs CivNat/classical liberals/sceptics" blood sports of 2015-2017 on the Alt-Right side.

Correct me if I'm wrong. It might be false memory, but I could swear he was pro-white and spoke about the JQ.

Chinese kids want to become astronauts while kids in the US and the UK want to become vloggers, according to poll by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't most education districts in the US have mixed ability classes? You have the studious A+ student who is put in the same class as disruptive IQ90s who can just about write their own name and don't give a shit about their education.

This is the problem. The Labour party in England experimented with this in the 1990s and 2000s by closing down most grammar schools (basically high schools for the top 20% of academically gifted people, mostly single sex) and sending everyone (except those who had parents with money of course, they could always go private) to 'comprehensive' schools with mixed-ability classes. It was a disaster. Many schools abandoned the practice.

Education should be segregated by ability. Bright kids, whether they're 'nerds' or not, should not be dragged down by low IQ troglodytes who want to piss around.

Baked Alaska Arrested by weasel in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wasn't he an OG Alt-Right "wignat" who went to Charlottesville? Then he disavowed everyone... then came back as a AF AmNat.

I felt sorry for him once when he nearly got blinded at C'ville, but it turns out he's a bit of a prick.

Baked Alaska Arrested by weasel in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unless he's a Fed informant, no way.

He's going to prison for at least 18 months.

I think the NJP needs to work on their optics. by Oingo in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't disagree with having better aesthetics and being smart about how you approach things, but the problem with optics autism is that eventually leads to cucking on principles and you start attracting people who aren't going to be on the same wavelength as you.

Look at Nick Fuentes and his America First movement. He has toned down a lot of the talking points about race and Zionism and is all but indistinguishable from a run of the mill civnat. He's hanging around with 'based blacks', I've seen his followers freaking out about people using the triple parenthesis (even though Jews use it themselves lol).

The kicker is, despite all of that, his movement is probably fucked after the StopTheSteal and January 6th malarkey.

Biden says he will prioritize helping non-white businesses recover after covid by FriedrichLudwig in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hunter Wallace didn't vote at all iirc. Spencer did, but it was more as a "fuck you" to Donald Trump and the MAGAtards than anything else.

No one is under any illusions about what's coming under Biden/Harris.

DC Events/Evacuation Thread -- Please post all news, links, threads on DC happenings here by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You think the right and left are held to the same standard and treated fairly? Lol. So cute.

DC Events/Evacuation Thread -- Please post all news, links, threads on DC happenings here by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The past 5 years alone have made me doubt a lot of "history" I've learned about the past century or so, from the Shoah in Europe to the Civil Rights era in America to Nelson Mendela/South Africa.

The barefaced lies told about Charlottesville a few years ago was one red pill. We see it happening again.

Will Nick and the Groypers have any success with their new escapade? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are three things I can envision with Nick Fuentes, going forward.

  1. He's going to get absorbed into the GOP fold as another Ann Coulter type figure. Racial / anti-Israel dogwhistles, but only on a superficial level

Milo has outright admitted he wants AF to be subverted into another gay civnat movement that whines about Muslims and never mentions Jews, race or Israel.

  1. His movement is going to implode within the next two years and you'll pretty much never hear from any of them ever again. It could be anything. Massive blackpilling after StopTheSteal fails, some dumb young AF guy getting taken in by fedposts to pull a Brenton Tarrant move, etc.

  2. Nick Fuentes will become wiser with age and become a "wignat", lol........ if his intellectual/political journey is honest, that's the trajectory. James Allsup saw the writing on the wall with "American Nationalism" and opted out. Of course the problem is that it's a very comfortable grift for Fuentes. He's never going to make this kind of money again.

Blackpill? 2020: Accelerating towards a European Superstate by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

After what happened to Rhodesia, South Africa, Yugoslavia, etc, I'm not convinced of this.

I'm as heart-warmed as any when I see Hungary making moves in the right direction. The realist in me knows that they will be easily crushed if they step out of line far enough. If not by bombs but by sanctions, the CIA etc astroturfing "pro-democracy" groups and agent provocateurs, etc. They are defenceless against these threats.

A united Europe is better able to pursue economic, geopolitical and more cultural independence on the world stage. The EU, whatever faults it has, has laid the foundations. All it really needs is based people in charge and some reforms. I have better faith in the EU being infiltrated than the GOP in America, lol. For one thing, it's relatively easy for based parties to get elected in the EU Parliament. Even the British National Party had seats in it a decade ago (not possible now of course). The BNP never came close to winning a seat in the British parliament.

I don't believe a divided Europe will achieve anything except bickering over bullshit issues, play on historical rivalries and butthurts, and ultimately every state will just be ZOG USA's bitch anyway. I'm from the UK originally, Brexit has been nothing but a parasite on nationalist energy and from a WN/ethnonationalist POV, it's going to leave Britain in a much worse place. Those Northern and Home Counties whites who voted leave to "take back control" on immigration are going to be nostalgic for the days of Polish builders who don't speak English on the train when half of Hong Kong, Nigeria, India, Pakistan, etc arrives.

Socially liberal nationalists? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not an anti-liberal purist who jumps on new trendy ideologies every week like being a 3rdPositionTradCathMonarchistMedievalPagan who wants to pretend they can rewind the clock to 1950s America, 1930s Germany, Victorian England, Rome, or whatever. I consider myself more of an 'alt-progressive' than 'trad', really. I don't have a problem with social conservatives, I just don't agree with them on everything.

I am for embracing technology and making the best of it. I believe in things like eugenics and investing in areas of science like genetic engineering, genuinely 'trad' people have trouble supporting these things. TradCaths I've spoken to are horrified by the idea of things like "designer babies", I see it as a good thing.

I don't have the perfect system in mind, but one thing I am against is the universal franchise. Most of the population should not be voting. Honestly, most of the voting population are fucking retards, and I include many boomer right-wing voters in that boat along with the woke college student 20-year-olds. Ultimately, who wins elections is whoever is best manipulated.

I don't have any tolerance for the LGBTQ+XYZ shit like trannies and stuff, but I don't have a problem with homosexuals. There has always been a small minority of men who are homosexual and who have no attraction to women. I don't see any point in forcing them to repress it and con women into marriage when realistically we know they'll be out fucking men in secret and picking up STDs. I don't mind letting them live relatively openly and letting them have a civil partner, but they should be banned from certain roles in society like the military, being prison officers, working in Boy Scouts type organisations.

I'm against women serving in the military and on 'front line' roles in the police and fire service. Women don't possess the abilities required to overpower criminals or drag people out of burning buildings, but there is nothing wrong with a woman being a detective or something like that. Women should also not be allowed to work in male prisons except as doctors/nurses.

I think women should generally be encouraged to marry and start having children young, but there is always going to be a segment of the female population who this isn't possible or suitable for. What about unattractive women? I don't mean women who can improve their situation (lose weight, etc), but women who are legitimately well below average? They're probably not going to find husbands. Female 'incels' may not exist, but women who can't get relationships certainly do. Not to mention women who are disabled, mentally ill, unable to have children for biological reasons, etc.

I don't believe women make natural leaders, they are not suited to run countries and major institutions (I've noticed a trend that they always end up being grotesquely masculinised like Margaret Thatcher, or they get steamrolled when the pressure is on), but I don't go full sperg and suggest they shouldn't take part in politics at all. I do get annoyed when I come across anonymous keyboard warriors who probably do fuck all for any movement shitting on the likes of Laura Towler for being a woman and playing an active political role. That woman does a lot for British ethnonationalism as deputy head of PA.

Recreational drugs? I've never taken them, not even cannabis, but I think the pragmatic thing to do is legalise and regulate them. The war on drugs is objectively a failure. They can't even keep drugs out of maximum security prisons, you're dreaming if you think even the best Fascist ethnostate can. That being said, I don't think drug shops should be everywhere (it would be banned to open one near a school or near a park for example) and they should not allowed to be open between about 8:00am-8:00pm. It's the sort of thing that should only be in town/city centres near nightclubs, etc. If adults can take them safely and not end up as fuckups, it doesn't bother me.

Blackpill? 2020: Accelerating towards a European Superstate by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IMO, Richard Spencer is right about this. Fuck Brexit and fuck the "based XYZ country" nationalism that many people in the DR go on with.

The EU has many flaws on a philosophical and structural level but a European "superstate" that wields some power and influence in the world is better than a collection of mostly small and irrelevant nation-states that are under the boot of ZOG USA anyway. Northern European or not.

An 'EU military' isn't a bad idea either. Not saying European countries should abolish their own militaries or relinquish ultimate control over them, but pooling resources, funding, etc together under a unified command of some kind and working together on military technology is better than a rag-tag band of shitty defence forces that can do nothing besides UN peacekeeping missions. Only the UK and France have good militaries (and, more importantly, their own nuclear weapons) at present.

Don't see how "nationalists" scaremonger over this, but then say nothing about the US having army and air force bases everywhere. EU military > NATO.

I've come to slowly believe that most of the virulent anti-EU hatred on the right is being pushed by those with a vested interest in a weaker and divided Europe - or they're being backed by people who do. Take Brexit for example. That was not an ethnonationalist victory, no matter how much BritNats like Morgoth, Mark Collett and Laura Towler like to tell themselves and others that it was. Neocon Tories and the J-Right pushed hard for it...... they have a raging hatred for not just the EU but European civilisation and European identity as a whole. Nigel Farage himself even claimed Brits have more in common with commonwealth countries like India than Europe. This is the mindset of British "Eurosceptics." Not "nationalism."

People should be realistic about China, they aren't your friend, and its doubtful they're anti-ZOG by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I tend to agree with the so-called "wignats" on most things, but the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" mentality a lot of them seemingly have on issues like Palestine, Muslims, China, etc, is jaw-droppingly naive.

There are aspects of China that I respect, but I don't trust them and I utterly despise the Chinese for other issues.

A theater for the ages- Trump's covid relief amendment is identical to the original house bill by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can't wait until he leaves office and his clown show MAGA cult fades away. I hope the GOP gets annihilated in the Georgia elections too. American conservatism in 2020 is one of the gayest things on the planet, maybe only rivalled by British conservatism.

Obama Term #3 will be a refreshing change if only because it'll be relatively honest. What you see is what you get. Globohomo, immigration, forever wars and BLM. No more "trusting the plan", "4D chess" or any of the other shit that Trump dick-riders and apologists have been spewing for the past 4 years while Trump fellates Israel and does fuck all on anything that matters. It's not even about "accelerationism" or whatever, that implies Trump and the GOP were in any way slowing things down.

Is Islam based? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know or care enough about Islam to give a big-brained answer, but Muslims themselves are not always as 'based' as some think they are.

I know most people on here are American and don't have as much direct contact with Muslims unless they live in certain areas of the US, but there are fuck loads of liberalised Muslims in Europe who embrace globohomo. I grew up in the English Midlands near Birmingham, which has loads of Muslims. I've known plenty of Muslim degenerates (by the apparent standards of their own religion) who drink and take drugs. Muslim women who shag around with white men and embrace feminism. If you spend long enough on UK politics twitter, you'll soon encounter Muslim women who have rainbow flags in their bios.

The thing is, they're not as visible. They've blended in and assimilated (as the civnats dreamt about). The traditional ones are more visible because they dress differently.

You've probably heard the meme that second generation Muslims are worse than their immigrant parents, etc, but that doesn't seem to be true. Many of the Muslims who end up going full Jihadi and carrying out those chickenshit terror attacks tend to be the ones who fail in liberalism, like the incels, petty criminals and alienated third worlders converts.

A common narrative from the Counter Jihad crowd about the Pakistani grooming gangs in places like Rotherham were motivated by "Islam", there isn't actually much evidence of that. By most accounts they are local degenerates and organised criminals who target easy victims. They knew that a bunch of low class white girls in foster care or dysfunctional households were a safer bet than girls in their own community, because they were afraid of consequences.

Fall of Islam in Iran: only 32% of Iranians are Muslims now by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That didn't work out so well for most of the American continent. European men all but miscegenated themselves out of existence by fucking native women.

Colonialism worked out so much better in the North because white men created European families with white women and had taboos and laws against miscegenation.

If you were given complete control, what would the immigration policy in your country be? by AltAlt in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As mentioned, the aim would be 95-98% racial homogeneity, which is roughly what Britain was about 40 years ago. Even as recently as the mid-1980s you can look up footage of London and still see nearly all white people walking the streets and travelling on the Tube.

The priority would be on deporting scum and repatriating more recent arrivals and their offspring. I think once you deported/repatriated these people, we'd be very close anyway. The tiny black community who have been in Liverpool for 150 years (or however long it is) aren't a problem.

Communist women have totally surprising fantasies by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I used to be involved in anarchist and socialist circles when I was younger, never met anyone who called themselves "far left." As someone now on the other side, I encounter Antifascist types a lot, they don't call themselves "far-left" either. Some will call themselves "radical" even, but not "far left."

I've been in WN/ethnonationalism for 7 years, I can think of only one person who unironically embraces the "far-right" title. People instead called themselves Alt-Right, Dissident Right, New Right, etc. FRENs doesn't count as it's ironic.

I'm sure you can go on social media and cherrypick a few cases, but as a rule, it's people from the other side who call their enemies "far X" because the label itself is supposed to imply you are too marginal or extreme to take seriously.

If you were given complete control, what would the immigration policy in your country be? by AltAlt in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whites Only, as a rule.

I would allow some form of Freedom of Movement from the EEA/EU in the sense that I would not require them to go through lengthy processes to obtain visas, but I would control the numbers and keep out trash like gangsters, murderers, paedophiles, etc as well as people known to be problematic in other ways. Speaking and writing English fluently would be a must too. White Americans, Australians, Canadians, South Africans, etc would be welcome too under similar terms.

I would start a program of repatriation for non-whites that would be rolled out gradually. I'd start with deporting all criminals and those on watchlists (like suspected Islamic terrorists), including offering early release from prison. I'd cancel all immigration visas and give them 6-12 months to leave. I'd then focus on naturalised citizens, starting with the most recent and move on down the line. Then I'd focus on the children of non-white immigrants, and so on. It would be mostly compensated repatriation.

Some non-whites would be allowed to stay / immigrate, like mixed-race people with a British parent, old people who have been in the country all their lives, exceptionally talented people (say, a Nobel science laureate) etc. The aim would be 95-98% racial homogeneity.

Pragmatically, there'd have to be major reforms of nationality law and investment in training our own people to ensure there isn't a major shortfall in key professionals.

Some people (even in these circles) think the idea of repatriation is horrible and inhumane because it involves getting rid of people from their homes, but I don't see the fuss. It's happened many times throughout history and it actually used to be a mainstream proposal (it used to be on the Tory manifesto ffs). These people themselves or their families have already experienced moving to a completely new country and starting afresh, they can do it again in their ancestral homelands or wherever else they go.

There are also people who say it'll be too expensive or impractical, I disagree. It can be done gradually, as I said. If it takes 15, 20, or 30 years, so be it.

There is no other alternative. It's too late to just stop immigration and hope for the best.

Do you have any sympathy for American soldiers who choose to fight for ZOG? by Courbeaux in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The US military is as big on diversity as every other US institution now. They want more women, LGBT and non-whites higher up in the ranks, holding prestigious commands and in prestigious MOS fields.

The credentialism is downstream from the warped American worship of higher education. Traditionally only officers needed a degree, but now a degree and even postgraduate degrees are expected if you want to climb the NCO ranks and make it a career.

Rejected why?

They never finished high school. They'd be considered "uneducated" grugs. Not only that, but Basilone and many guys who served in WWII got up to all sorts of fucking around on liberty like fighting with and stealing shit from the MPs and officers, etc. That's less tolerated these days.

I get that it's a bad idea to recruit irredeemable pieces of shit, but the military has historically been a place where a young man would get a second chance to be a good citizen. The famous former US Marine actor (the strict drill instructor in Full Metal Jacket) R. Lee Ermey used to be a serial criminal before a judge gave him a choice between jail and the service. Nowadays they're more interested in a minority XYZ studies graduate.

Communist women have totally surprising fantasies by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why do people believe everything they read on the internet? Especially random anonymous reddit posts?

Not only is the person not a "communist" but it's probably not even a female. It's a Republican male. Probably a fat MAGAtard boomer who imagines himself to be a Chad or some homosexual.

Here are some giveaways.

"far left" - they don't call themselves this, just as most of us don't call ourselves "far-right" (at least those that our enemies malign as "far-right", cucky lolberts have embraced this label apparently)

The description of the conservative man and the fantasy itself sounds like something out of gay porn.

Women are certainly attracted to the kind of men described, but they don't articulate it like that.

Do you have any sympathy for American soldiers who choose to fight for ZOG? by Courbeaux in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, it's important to remember that by and large the only American soldiers who actually fight and suffer in wars are the infantry grunts and SOCOM. Most of the military are rear echelon workers doing a glorified 9-5 job in uniform. They don't suffer at all and are actually well-compensated compared to most Americans. Most Americans do not get the chance of their employer paying for their degree or free health care, etc.

Most infantry grunts are young guys, about 18-22, who have been raised on Call of Duty and war films and revering American war heroes. They're usually working-class guys from small towns and rural areas in the South and flyover states. They aren't politically engaged and don't know shit about the world or geopolitics. They're just hoping to experience the thrill of combat and kill the people they're told are the "bad guys."

I definitely have sympathy when they go out on patrol and step on an IED, and end up losing two legs, an arm and are left with irreversible scarring on their faces before they can legally drink and are then kicked out of the service with nothing to show for it. Most of these men don't find love or gainful employment, they'll spend the rest of their life being pitied and as a prop for virtue signalling politicians and members of the public. Everyone looks at KIA statistics, but there are thousands of men like this from Iraq and Afghanistan. In many ways, this is where modern medicine is a curse, in WW1 and WW2 they'd have just died.

Do you have any sympathy for American soldiers who choose to fight for ZOG? by Courbeaux in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

99% of the US military aren't "Chads."

Fighter pilots, Navy SEALs, Special Forces guys, etc might be, but the average soldier is not.

US military culture has changed a lot since the days of WWII and Vietnam, back in the days when a judge would offer criminals the choice between jail or enlisting in the Army or the Marines. There was a more working class masculine culture. It's all about diversity and credentialism now, which is something they brag about. You've probably seen military supporters brag about how most Americans are unfit for military service, and think they're just referring to fatasses or whatever....... but men like John Basilone and Audie Murphy would be rejected if they tried to enlist today.

Do you have any sympathy for American soldiers who choose to fight for ZOG? by Courbeaux in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It depends on the kind of imperialism.

Colonising continents for the prosperity of your posterity is based.

Being Israel's bitch and invading countries at their behest or to bring them "democracy", tranny rights and more McDonald's joints is gay.

Let's face it, American "imperialism" is the latter.

What do you think of the alt-lite? by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Alt Lite are mostly just Trump cheerleading civnats, libertarians and Zionists who have been accepted into the GOP fold, more or less. They have the big follower counts and blue checkmarks on Twitter.

The "alt-right" is basically a collective name for ethnonationalists/white nationalists of various stripes. TradCaths to alt-progressives, manospherians and racially aware white TERFs (yes, that is kind of a thing, a TERF wrote for Radix).

Tbh, I think these terms are redundant now because it's difficult to distinguish most of the Alt-Lite from normie conservatives. Paul Joseph Watson would not look out of place in the UK Tory Party. He is nowhere near as edgy or controversial as he might imagine himself to be, he even distances himself from conspiratards. Although you do get people like Katie Hopkins who sometimes walk a fine line.

The "Alt-Right" is a clusterfuck of infighting and people who hate each other, e.g. Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer.

Richard Spencer - I look at Kyle Rittenhouse and I want to beat him up by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Richard Spencer supports pan-Europeanism and sees small state European nationalism as futile (which it is), yep, but not a "Eurasian" order. There was a tape of him leaked years ago saying he wanted Europeans to retake Constantinople and expel the Turks.

As for accusations about him being fed, you'll need more solid proof than guilt by association. He's not a working-class average joe. It's no secret that he's rich and from a fairly well-connected background, he went to prep school, went to good universities, wrote for conservative magazines in the past, etc. It's not unlikely when you've been in those circles that you'll meet certain notable people.

If he's a fed, they're not doing a good job. He's not the most popular figure in the movement and apparently, they've forgotten to tell YouTube that he's Kosher for their platform.

Agree with him. Disagree with him. Whatever, but this is one of the things that pisses me off about the movement, people can't grasp nuance and can't handle disagreement, so they just make up shit about them being feds/shills/whatever without evidence.

I disagree with the America First/Nick Fuentes crowd on most things. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't suspicious about how relatively accepted they are by mainstream(ish) conservatives, in fact America First looks exactly what I'd imagine an alt-right deradicalization project to look like (weaning off young men from focusing on racial issues to GOP conservatism like bitching about abortion and 'based black people', even Milo publicly stated this), but I don't spread rumours about Fuentes being a fed or controlled opposition, because there is no evidence.

Richard Spencer - I look at Kyle Rittenhouse and I want to beat him up by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Bullshit. Out of all the people in the movement, Richard Spencer is among the least normie-friendly.

If Richard Spencer just wanted to grift, he would just stick to digestible nationalist hivemind talking points. Trump good (or at least "the lesser of two evils"), Democrats bad, StopTheSteal, EU bad, Brexit good, #BasedHungary, brown immigration bad, Muslims bad, fuck Zionists, race and crime/race and IQ stuff.

This is the stuff that gets more viewers/shekels rolling in because you're just regurgitating shit that people already think and want to hear. This is one of the reasons why people like Nick Fuentes/America First is so popular.

Richard Spencer takes stances that make him more unpopular within the movement, it does not win him friends from the left or normie right who still see him as that Nazi who said "Heil Trump, Heil our people, Heil victory" 4 years ago.

I do think there are fair criticisms to be made of him, I think he can be contrarian for the sake of being contrarian, I don't like how he's thrown NJP under the bus (which I do sense is because he hasn't been asked to play a role in it), but I increasingly agree with him and find he often accurately reads and predicts things. He saw the Trump mess for exactly what it was early on while others were spouting shit about "trusting the plan", "give him time", etc. He is right about Europe and the UK.

As for self-censorship, every figure in the movement self-censors, dude.

I don't know where Richard Spencer has "pushed liberalism"... do you mean UBI and forgiving student loan debt and things like that? Those are policies that would help white people start families. He's not a petty racial libertarian who just wants to stop giving free shit to blacks.

Millenniyule 2020 by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He is bisexual.

He has freely admitted on his videos numerous times that he's slept with/kissed men and he used to think he was gay until he developed a crush on a female friend in art college that lasted for something like 7 years.

I can't think of the exact videos, but I know one of them had the description 'some embarrassing personal history' and he mentioned his homosexual history in the 'Doing it for the Lowles' video when Hope Not Hate tried to doxx him in 2015.

The rumour is that he's sent dick pics to men.

BitChute bans the Nordic Resistance Movement by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If BitChute is actively collaborating with Hope Not Hate scumfucks (and not simply being pressured), they deserve to go under. Fuck them.

How to Know if Your Date is Transgender: 10 Steps (with Pictures) Actually Tries to Convince Readers That Transgender "Women" are Women, That There is No Real Differenc, You Should Be Openminded, and Transgenders Have No Duty to Disclose Upfront by Richard_Parker in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The "transwomen" who are convincing are only convincing because of camera filters, plastic surgery and good makeup artistry. TERFs have made the observation that this is only possible because of feminine beauty standards which more or less encourage women to be as fake as possible, I think they have a point tbh.

Take off the war paint and you'll quickly be able to tell the difference between a woman and a tranny.

To atheist/agnostic alt-righters by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't care about homosexuality and I don't see any point in persecuting adult men who fuck other consenting adult men and can't get it up for the opposite sex. There has always been a small percentage of men who are homosexual.

Nothing good comes from persecuting homosexuals and forcing them to live in the closet where they'll marry women and then get fucked up the ass on the side and pass on STDs.

It's better to allow them to live openly and co-habitate with their partners. If necessary, ban openly gay men from serving in institutions which are (or should be) all male, like the Army, prisons (as officers), Boy Scouts type organisations (for the same reason heterosexual men should not be put in charge of orgs for young girls) etc.

This is not to say I support the LGBQTWTF culture, transgenderism is an abomination, but I think the culture should shame promiscuity in general.

For what it's worth, I'm not a "conservative" and I don't LARP as a TradCathMedievalMonarchistDictatorNazBol or whatever "throw the liberal baby out with the bathwater" ideology fashionable in the "dissident right" this week.

Ed Dutton (Jolly Heretic) - Why Are Autistics Attracted to BOTH to Conservatism and Libertarianism? by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wonder if these people are really autistic, though, even if some team of shrinks has diagnosed them as such.

There is certainly a category of people (mainly men) who are intelligent and eccentric, but socially inept and/or disinterested in the 'normie' world, they're obsessed with certain topics or hobbies (data, dissident politics, animals, trains, whatever) that other people don't get, but they don't have the problems that is traditionally associated with autism.

This is anecdotal, but most of the people I've known who were diagnosed with autism are below average intellectually and they have a lot of problems with things like basic hygiene, tying their shoelaces, making their beds, not being able to handle crowds or loud noises at all (which is not the same thing as simply not liking parties), lashing out, etc. I'm not talking the severe cases either. If you've ever watched the Vietnam War film Full Metal Jacket, Private Pyle is what those autistic people are like.

As for ADHD, I've noticed that's a condition that seems to always magically disappear when they reach adulthood.

Moderate Trump era anti-racists in the Biden era by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anti-racist shitlibs just rationalise their way out of these things. If it isn't the fault of Fascist Trump, then it will be his toxic legacy after he leaves. They already talk in those terms. E.g. "it will take years to undo all the damage Trump has done." Go over to somewhere like r/politics and they're talking about how America needs to be forcefully deradicalised like post-1945 Germany lol.

I think the difference is, ironically, is that the Democrats will take less shit from BLM than Trump did, for optics reasons if nothing else. They won't allow riots to go on for weeks or months on end. More than likely, if/when it pops up again, they'll be contained to whatever city the "police brutality" incident took place in and end after about 3-5 days like in the Obama years. Antifa won't be involved and you won't see as much corporate virtue signalling.

Ed Dutton (Jolly Heretic) - Why Are Autistics Attracted to BOTH to Conservatism and Libertarianism? by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kind of beside the point, but I've noticed this with Ed Dutton a lot that he talks about autistic people being X or Y, and it's associated with intelligence. What is it with the DR and fascination with autistic people?

'High functioning' autistics are glamorised a lot, but honestly, I think ASD has become one of those conditions that are overdiagnosed or autism is a bullshit psychiatric category. It seems anyone intelligent who is very introverted and/or eccentric is 'autistic' now.

Autistic people are mentally disabled. They have low IQs and cannot function independently and/or they have behavioural issues. Violence, self-harm, sensory issues like excessive masturbation or touching their own shit. Some of them can't even speak.

Congress passes more immigration visa expansions by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It depends on what caste/religion they're from.

I'm not a civnat by any means, but I can see why many people have a soft spot for Sikhs. My brother's next door neighbours (in Birmingham, UK) are a Boomer-aged Sikh couple who have lived in Britain for about 50-60 years. They're extremely kind, they spoil him with free food and once got extremely worried when they didn't see him for several days because he was away on holiday, as he forgot to mention it to them. I hate to say it, but good neighbours are rare these days, even in white homogenous neighbourhoods, people don't give a shit about their neighbours. My (Irish) mother has mentioned that it's something that's been lost to time.

Adolf Hitler enjoys a landslide election win to become administrator of a small district in Namibia by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Optics BTFO'd?

Ann Coulter calls out Jewish control of the media by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The thing that gets me about Ann Coulter is that she clearly gets it and she'll walk the line, but then retreat.

I remember when I started following her on Twitter years ago, I noticed that for every 5 or so tweets where she was hitting the spot (talking about demographic change or whatever), she would then come out with some DR3 derp or shill for establishment Republicans.

She reminds me a lot of Katie Hopkins (minus Katie's Zionism), Katie Hopkins occasionally talks about race and ask where White Christians have to run to after Europe's overrun, the plight of whites in South Africa, or whatever.. then she'll come out with an ice cold take on how Antifa or the left are just hijacking black causes like BLM, therefore they're the actual racists.

What do you think of this ex fascist on reddit? by ShiversRussia2017 in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't believe the story.

Most "deradicalisation" stories are either fake or they're under some kind of legal pressure.

There are many people who have left the movement, but it's not because they've had some American History X style "seeing the error of their hateful ways" but because they're disillusioned.

Serious question: which would you rather accept? by Courbeaux in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A low class white single mother with white children.

It's not an ideal situation, but at least she's having white children. Fuck the trad larping (most of the people in the movement don't live trad lives, it is not even feasible for many, most white men in 2020 do NOT earn enough to support a wife + 3+ kids, no amount of pretty pictures of trad girls from 100+ years ago ) we're not in the situation to be choosy. I don't care if white women go out and get knocked up by white Chads year after year until she hits menopause. I don't care if she cucks the state into paying for them. The more the better, as far as I'm concerned.

If we win, we can reform society later down the line. There is no future without white children.

As for the white cuckservative with the oriental wife, he's not having white children and he's investing in his resources in non-white kids. What the fuck good is that to "white nationalism"? Key word: White.

Serious question: which would you rather accept? by Courbeaux in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You must be a troll or joking, why would you want to promote white men being disloyal to their white wives? It's also really degenerate and kind of creepy.

I really don't get why yellow fever weirdos claim to be WNs/ethnonats, you don't get to have your cake and eat it too. If you want to fuck Asians and other non-whites, you may as well just be a liberal or a civnat.

What exactly did FOX News do that has pissed off conservatives so much? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're not getting behind the retarded StopTheSteal clown show/grift. They're thinking long-term and trying to move on from Trump.

Thoughts on National Justice Party? by nickko in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm curious to see what will happen to Nick Fuentes and his AF movement post-Trump. The Stop the Steal bullshit is going to fail.

I don't dislike Nick, but I've always found his unconditional support and loyalty to Trump weird, it seems his platform included putting a lot of stock in 'Trusting the Plan' and this idea that Trump is secretly based. I don't think it's an act or a grift, the kid seems damn near emotional about Trump. His followers are surely going to be blackpilled next year when they come to the realisation that Trump's gone and there was no "plan" after all. I don't think Trump is going to run again in 2024, I think he's very much a one-hit wonder (or blunder, rather).

Thoughts on National Justice Party? by nickko in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope it grows and isn't forgotten about/abandoned. It has some very people involved in it, besides Strike and Mike, they have guys like Greg Conte and James Allsup.

The UK's Patriotic Alternative led by Mark Collett and Laura Towler are doing well. Not well enough yet to start winning seats in parliament, but they're surpassing all the bland Zio civnat organisations and they're engaged in lots of activism and community projects, including homeschooling. They've even got a tea company going after the whole BLM bullshit (Laura was publicly disavowed by Yorkshire Tea, lol). Mark Collett has 20 years of experience in WN politics, having been a member of the BNP, so he's learned from their mistakes, and Laura is a very smart chick.

I believe NJP could get to a similar level in the US.

Nick Fuentes won't get behind it, nor will the Counter Currents lot. Fuentes and his AF boys are chasing the dream of 'infiltrating the GOP' (that will probably go nowhere).

Blinken retells stepfather’s HARROWING Holocaust story by weasel in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I laughed out loud when I heard this story the other day. It's the fakest shit I've ever heard.

Honestly, how do 'normies' not see through stuff like this? Even if you're not a Holocaust sceptic, when something in real-life sounds like it was ripped straight from the script of some cliche-ridden Hollywood film, alarm bells have to be ringing.

Blinken retells stepfather’s HARROWING Holocaust story by weasel in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Next Wolfenstein game plot.

Blinken retells stepfather’s HARROWING Holocaust story by weasel in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. Looking through Biden's picks and their early life bios on Wikipedia has been one EVERY SINGLE TIME moment after another. You could almost turn this shit into a drinking game.

Apocalypse now: Biden will immediately give amnesty to 11 million illegals and tax gun ownership. Cory Booker proposes land distribution laws for blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting reply. I'm inclined to agree re: Biden.

As for the Democrats developing a supermajority, I would've believed that 6 months ago even, now I'm just not sure. I don't believe they'll ever lose ~90% of the black vote and they seem to have a good hold over the Asian vote (~70%), but 'Hispanics' seem to be a giant question mark. Of course, it's a dumb category anyway, because it comprises of so many different nationalities and race/ethnic groups and lumps them together based on language, but they helped keep Florida and Texas red, even though they helped turn New Mexico, California and even possibly Arizona (we'll see if that's a permanent change) blue.

What's the physical difference between French, Germans and Anglos? Can they be physically distinguished? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I live in Ireland, but spent the first 20 years of my life in the UK. The English, Scottish and Welsh are generally distinct, I'd go further and suggest there are differences between the English.

A lot of Welsh are very dark looking. In England, of course you've got the Cornish (Celts) in the Southwest, but I think people from the Southeast and the Northeast tend to be more fair-haired/blonder.

In Ireland, jet black hair and blue eyes are very common. Despite the stereotypes, I think I encounter far fewer gingers with freckles here than I did in the UK, in all honesty. I've found that stereotype more accurate of the Scottish to a degree. Of course in England you've got places which are basically almost Irish colonies (like Liverpool), where you'll see Irish-looking people. You can also tell by personality and sense of humour, even if they're several generations in. It's very rare to see a natural blond(e) from Ireland, if you see one, the chances are they're the descendents of Protestants from Britain. Northern Ireland is a good example. Apparently, during the Troubles, British soldiers could guess with reasonable accuracy what side of the fence people were on just by looking at them.

I've never been on the continent, but from what I can tell, a lot of the French have a very Mediterranean look. Germans have a distinctive chiseled almost 'square' look (compared to those from the British Isles, let's say, who look 'softer').

I can sometimes guess the ancestry of white Americans and others in the New World, usually their last name is an indicator, but their facial features give a hint. I can't be bothered to look up the name of the actor, but the guy who plays Ryan O'Reilly in the 1990s HBO prison drama Oz is definitely of Irish descent. I'm not sure how accurate the stereotype is (or if it's outdated), but I've noticed that the high school/university 'jock' American football quarterback has a German look, especially in TV/films from maybe the 1950s to around the 1990s or so.

Apocalypse now: Biden will immediately give amnesty to 11 million illegals and tax gun ownership. Cory Booker proposes land distribution laws for blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think he will last at least 6 months if he's able (even if he's not really running the show), I don't think they'll want it to look too obvious that he was just there to carry Kamala Harris in. In any case, I predict he will retire in time to give Harris long enough to gain familiarity with the US public as POTUS and have the 'incumbent advantage' by the time the next election rolls around.

Thoughts on ethnicity mixing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have a problem with it. It should be neither encouraged nor discouraged.

If you're from the New World, especially the US, the chances are you're a Euromutt anyway. Even a lot of Aussies are Euromutts, it wasn't just the British and Irish who colonised Australia, and it wasn't just people from Britain who were invited in under White Australia policy. There were a fair few Italians, Portuguese, Dutch, etc.

I don't think inter-European mixing has harmed these countries at all.

In Europe itself, it's more complicated. I wouldn't want the Nordics to be swamped by Iberians, or the UK to be swamped by too many Slavs, or whatever, and to heavily intermix... but on a smaller level, I don't give a shit. It doesn't bother me if a British or Irish man marries a Russian woman, or a British woman marries an Italian man. It's not remotely the same thing as full on race-mixing, like a white woman with a black man, or a white man with an East Asian woman. One of the reasons being, is that their children will indistinguishable from the native population.

On a more shallow level, I also think that mixed European people tend to be quite beautiful/handsome, although it depends on the mix.

Apocalypse now: Biden will immediately give amnesty to 11 million illegals and tax gun ownership. Cory Booker proposes land distribution laws for blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We'll see, but I doubt it will be that drastic.

One thing to keep in consideration is that the American left is stunned out at how high Trump's voter turnout was this year. They see their victory as a pyrrhic one. Go over to r/Politics, and you'll see many of them are legit fearful that a significant percentage of America has "fascist" leanings (I know it's amusing, but this is their mentality) and they know that in slightly different circumstances (e.g. no Covid-19), Trump would've won in a landslide. They were hedging their bets on a total repudiation of Trump and a return to a pre-2016 'normalcy'.

Trump is gone, but they know that someone just like him, or someone further to the right could win again. Hell, he might even run again in 2024 (I doubt that, but you never know). They're going to be very cautious about pushing the boat on policies that get the backs up of their voters.

They will also need control of the Senate, I'm not American so I don't know the intricacies of that, but I think the GOP are going to maintain a slight majority.

What you're likely to see is the slow boil. The number of 3rd world refugees admitted to the US skyrocketing, more woke shit entering the discourse, more regime change bombings/wars (Europe can look forward to Migrant Crisis 2.0 by 2022 I'm guessing), etc.

Apocalypse now: Biden will immediately give amnesty to 11 million illegals and tax gun ownership. Cory Booker proposes land distribution laws for blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I doubt there will be a permanent Democrat-majority.

The Republican Party is actively trying to rebrand itself as a party for non-whites, they've shown that they will throw whites under the bus for an extra 5 black voters. They'll rail against "identity politics" to their White voters (the last thing their Jewish handlers want is racially conscious Whites), while giving thumbs up for shit like "Latinos 4 Trump" and shit like the Platinum Plan for blacks.

They will abandon every stated principle to do it.

Apocalypse now: Biden will immediately give amnesty to 11 million illegals and tax gun ownership. Cory Booker proposes land distribution laws for blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the idea behind accelerationism is to create a backlash. I'm sceptical over whether it would ever work like that, but conservatives (and I include Trump in that) do nothing either, they just delude people into a false sense of security. It's not even a lesser of two evils situation.

Can you honestly say it's been better to be a white nationalist (of any stripe) in the last 4 years than pre-Trump (assuming you've been 'redpilled' that long)?

Apocalypse now: Biden will immediately give amnesty to 11 million illegals and tax gun ownership. Cory Booker proposes land distribution laws for blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it's kind of obvious that he's just there to get Kamala Harris in. He's going to retire on medical grounds before the 2024 election.