casparvoneverec

You said that post war SS officers who worked with the soviets were standard hitlerists. Well Hitler despised the Soviet Union and saw it as the ultimate Jewish abomination. Hence his commissar order and general brutality towards Soviet peoples.

If SS members during the cold war were financed by the Soviets then they were either shills or useful idiots. The Soviets did not finance them to bring about white revolution in the west and create a National socialist state. If they funded them it was solely to destabilize western countries and make them easier to dominate or invade. This is nothing new. The US during the cold war often funded marxists in order to destabilize a country and prepare the ground for a military coup.

The Soviet Union was by now stretch of the imagination, pro-white. They funded all anti-white negro movments in Africa. They played a decisive role in destroying Rhodesia and South Africa by providing massive quantities of arms and ammunition to Mugabe and the ANC.

As for genociding slavs, I suggest you actually read on WW2, the military conflict rather than exclusively get your knowledge of the even through post war neo-nazi revisionism and Strike&mike delusions.

Poland lost 6 million people in WW2. 3 million were Jews and the other three million were ethnic poles. They were killed in a deliberate policy of starvation and mass murders. Ukraine lost 8 million people, again mostly due to deliberate starvation. The Germans took 5 million Soviet prisoners yet only 2 million of them survived. Tell me, why did the compassionate white nationalists of the reich kill 3 million slavic men who had surrendered to them?

The Germans committed hundreds if not thousands of massacres in the USSR and Poland, too many to count. On Septermber 23rd, 1942, German occupation forces shot to death 2800 people in 21 Ukrainian villages, including 1600 children.

When the Germans first entered the Soviet Union, they were hailed as liberators by the local people, who had been oppressed for years by communism. Yet, within a year, the whole population turned against them and began a ferocious guirella campaign. Why? Its because of these attrocities and the German starvation policy. Hitler could have had a secure rear and hundreds of thousands of volunteers against bolshevism but he blew it thanks to SS attrocities.

Many German generals like Von Kuchler, Von Kluge, Hammerstein and Treskow were horrified by the brutality shown against slavic civilians and protested. Kuchler was even temporarily removed from command because he wouldn't let Himmler's criminals terrorie Polish civilians. Tell me, are Eric Striker and Mike Enoch better authorities on wartime German activities than German generals and field marshals of the time?

Czechs were spared the same fate largely because it was a major industrial center and key to the German war effort and Hitler didn't want to destabilize the region. But massacres were plenty there as well. In 1942, two czech fighters killed Reinhard Heydrich in operation antrhopod. In retaliation the Germans massacred 6000 random Czech civilians the next few days.

German massacres were also common during their retreat from France. There was the Oradur San Glane massacre where they burnt down a church full of civilians. There was the malmedy massacre where they executed US prisoners of war. They even massacered and brutalized Italian civilians after Mussolini was deposed. Hitler even took ''concessions'' from Mussolini. After the war was over, Germany was to be handed over Northern Italy. So much for the noble ally.

In the end, you don't even need to look at all this for evidence of his desire to wipe out the slavs. You only need read Mein kampf. Hitler clearly stated that in order for Germany to be a true world power, it needed resources and land. It could not afford a colonial empire due to British domination of the seas so it needed a contigious land empire. This land was to be won in Russia, a country that had recently been devastated by civil war and was now ruled by a despotic Bolshevik regime.

Germans were to colonize these lands after conquest. This process was already underway in Poland as the Hitler regime settled 500,000 Germans in Poland. There was perfect logic to these actions. Germany did need land and resources in order to be a truly sovereign world power and eastern Europe was the logical choice. Slavs were a hinderance to this objective.

It makes perfect sense from the point of German nationalism. The slavs were racial aliens and it made sense according to nazi ideology to push them out and take their land. The nazis were never white nationlists, they were german nationalists. White nationlism didn't even exist back then as whites dominated the world. There was no threat of being overtaken by POC and world was divided into white empires. So rivalry was between white nations and ethnic nationlism was the order of the day.e

Only in 1943, when Germany was decisively losing the war did they make noises about a great struggle to save Europe from Soviet communism.

Most National Socialists, including Hitler, saw the USSR as a lesser evil to the plutocracies as well.

That's interesting to hear. Because on January 1st, 1945, there were 224 German divisions on the Eastern Front against the communists and 50 German divisions on the Western front against capitalists. During the war, Hitler repeatedly wanted make separate peace and an alliance with alliance with Britain and take on the Soviets together. He refused to make a separate peace with the Soviets.

One could almost think that Hitler saw the Soviets as the greater enemy and wanted to ally with the British. If he saw the Anglo-American capitalists as the greater threat, it would make sense for him to divert most of his army to the west and delay allied advance and let Germany fall mostly into the hands of the Soviets.

---

The problem with WW2 narratives is that it has restrospectively made into this epic battle of good and evil like Lord of the rings. Where one side is the side of light, the good guys who did no wrong and the other is the side of satan. Mainstream liberal views are actually more nuanced than far right views as they acknowledge that the allies did many evil things. Alt right views are more retarded as they view the Nazis as the side of good who dindu nuffin wrong.

In reality, the world wars where simply another intra european war, in the same vein as the thirty years war, the war of the spanish succession, the seven years war and the French revolutionary wars. These wars were generally fought in order to contain and cut down a country that had become too strong. In the 30 years war it was the habsburg empire, in the spanish succession war and Napoleonic wars this was France, in the world wars it was Germany. The world wars were more devastating because they were fought in an age of industrialization.

People at the time saw it as just another great power conflict.

I'd suggest to you to read up on WW2 from a military POV. Hitlerphilia is cured by reading on the actual war. It becomes painfully evident that he was a pigheaded retard who ruined Germany's chance of victory and dragged it along with the rest of Europe into the abyss.