The different political systems indigenous to each race

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-23T05:41:58+00:00

That Karelia girl looks angelic.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-23T05:22:13+00:00

creating your own meaning

No one has done this successfully. Certainly not Nietzsche himself who fucked his own sister and was confined to a mental ward for the last years of his life.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-22T15:35:34+00:00

Bourla was born and raised in Thessaloniki, Greece.[5] His parents, who were Sephardi Jews, were among the 2,000 of 50,000 Jews in Thessaloniki to survive the Holocaust;

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-22T08:48:43+00:00

According to the Traditionalist view, this would be transcendent values - experiential spirituality, honour, courage, wisdom, autonomy, detachment, etc. etc. This is the only foundation for a state or a morality that I would consider acceptable.

What's the basis of these transcendental values? Is it the word of God, or is it evolutionarily adaptive? Why would you consider these values transcendental rather than others? It seems to be purely arbitrary in the sense that one picks these values simply because these values feel good. In the same vein, isn't free sex or going to Africa and giving food to niglets a transcendental value as well, since it feels good?

The Darwinist view assigns primary importance to biological life

That's fundamental. All morality starts from life. Our very sense of morality comes from evolutionary pressures that caused us to develop such feelings in order to preserve life. Morals such as honor or courage only have meaning in the context of human life. They hold no value in some barren wasteland like mars.

The issue is, is one of finding meaning and purpose in life. You can derive a sort of meaning from a darwinian view that you are the product of billions of years of evolution and it is your purpose in life to conform to adaptive behaviors. Your purpose of being born is to serve your tribe and spread your genes.

In certain cases honour can make survival more, not less, difficult. The same applies for generosity and altruism. The importance of these things is affirmed through life and in life, but not for life.

I'll concede, this is a solid point. The issue again comes to why exactly are values such as generosity and altruism considered good or essential? How did these values come to be in the first place? They have become so because they were evolutionarily adaptive. A nation that abandons such values will have low trust and support amongst themselves and will collapse in the face of one that has not dropped these values.

The objective of conforming to and abiding by natural law/evoltuionarily adaptive behavior leads you to the same end of cherishing such values.

It is called natural law, not supernatural law, after all. In this view, human beings are trapped within the world of material cause and effect, and end up acting as puppets of the laws of nature and the world, rather than making these laws.

Unfortunately, this is the point where I become somewhat Reddit. The supernatural law is something that is vague and incomprehensible. You cannot establish a solid moral or intellectual foundation upon something you have no evidence or cannot even fully qualify. How do you know you have a soul? How do you know whether this soul goes to heaven, hell, Valhalla, purgatory, or Elysium after death? How does one measure the value of one soul against another?

As u/LGBTQIAIDS put it in another post a while back, such emphasis on souls and other forms of abstract, magical (I don't like to use this term but still) beliefs opens the door to ruinous egalitarianism. For example, the Christian belief in souls and that we are made in the image of God. If you hold such a belief, it is only logical for you to work from that to radical egalitarianism.

What physical(material) differences races have is immaterial before what they have in common: God-given eternal souls. After all, you can't claim that the soul of one race is better than other or the soul of a heterosexual is more deserving of heaven than that of a homosexual for the simple reason that you can't measure souls or see them.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-22T08:26:59+00:00

The core issue at the heart of the modern world and its rot is the question of purpose and meaning.

Why do we exist? Why do our societies exist? Why should I live a moral life or care about my heritage or community at all?

The answer of the liberal-modernist establishment is identical to the Nietzschean one: there is no meaning.

The liberals simply took this answer to its logical conclusion. So what if my grandchildren become 70 IQ mulattoes and live in a dustbin? What if Congolese gang rapists burn my ancestral cemetery and rape my sister? What if I engage in sodomy, do drugs, and rape kids? Why is it wrong? Why is anything wrong in the absence of any grand meaning?

Are we not just a random arrangement of quarks and leptons that assumed this formation by pure happenstance? When we die, do we not simply change the arrangement of said particles? Then, do our lives and actions have any meanings? Aren't they just meaningless rearrangements of particles?

A world in which humans lack this sense of purpose or meaning is a world doomed to die like the current liberal west. Declining birth rates, immigrant invasions, and collapsing moral and social outcomes.

The only way one can draw any meaning from this world is through God or a sense of natural law.

Natural law/evolutionarily adaptive behavior is the expression of God's will in that societies that stray from adaptive values (For example, patriarchy, nationalism, piety, martial vigor, modesty, chastity, hardiness) atrophy and lose out in the eternal contest of nations.

You can draw meaning from that in either of two ways. Either you could hold that natural law/dharma is God's will and your purpose in life is to abide by it. Or you could interpret it in a biological way: You are a product of billions of years of evolution and it is your biological duty and purpose to abide by dharma/adaptive behaviors. That is your purpose.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-22T08:13:42+00:00

It's pretty reasonable but still ideological. The fact that you summed up two viewpoints in a few lines doesn't mean that they are completely self-evident and uncontroversial. In the first example you say "That which is good for the group and the individual" is good but only "That which is maladaptive for the group" is bad, so you are proposing some form of collectivism or socialism here. But a lot of people believe in individualism.

The issue I'd argue is that there is a universal trend for things that are maladaptive and adaptive aka dharma or adharma. If different civilizations started with the objective that survival and improvement of the nation within was the greatest good, they'd all arrive more or less at the same solutions. Just like how all liberal regimes have arrived at the same policies: hate speech laws, media gaslighting, LGBT indoctrination at school, and feminist laws that penalize men and masculine behavior.

I'd argue that this objective is the obvious goal for any civilization or group as groups that don't prioritize such goals will be defeated in competition with groups that do. A type of natural selection of ideologies.

Religions went through this natural selection already. Islam, Christianity and the other great faiths survived for thosuands of years because they promoted good outcomes for their adherent populations: high fertility, modesty, chastity, love of kin, sacrifice for the community etc.

Religions that did not produce good outcome died off. For example, in Russia, there was a cult in which men chopped off their balls. This cult didn't survive as it produced eunuchs and did not increase in numbers or strength.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-22T08:07:05+00:00

Ye, Hitler wanted those lands for autarky but he did not need to wipe out the slavs from those lands. Hitler needed the grain, iron ore, and manganese of Ukraine, the oil of the Caucasus, and the tungsten of Krasnodar. Simply driving the Russians off those lands and annexing or puppetizing those lands would've made those resources accessible for Germany.

He did not need genocide and brutalize millions of slavs living there. That's where the ideology came in.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-19T09:46:15+00:00

Nah. The Russian rulers are Soviet boomers and tend towards cronyism. They only know how to do things in the old crony way with bribes, state-controlled media, and obsession with international law and ''partners''. It's all they know since they were born and educated in the USSR. That being said, there is a trend towards nationalism from the younger generations.

Young Russians without state support do kickass OSINT, propaganda, and information warfare. Same with several Russian hacking groups that recently declared war on the US and schooled anonymous recently.

There is grassroots nationalism and patriotism in Russia that old Soviet boomers don't know how to handle or interpret. Once they die off, Russia will become much more functional and nationalistic.

The US has this issue today. All its elites post-silent generation have been indoctrinated so thoroughly by liberal propaganda that they can't form realistic views of the world anymore.

They're not realistic, competent or men of the world like Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Jacob Rothschild or Brezinski were.

They legit believe that people in Russia and China are extremely opressed and are crying out for American ''liberation''. NATO in fact held a wargame that modeled an invasion of Russia from Estonia and their model included Russian villagers greeting the Americans as democratic liberators from Putin's autocracy.

They literally thought that removing Starbucks, Mcdonald's, WhatsApp, and other western brands from Russia would cause the people there to revolt and overthrow Putin.

What we see as liberal propaganda and sloganeering is what goes for education for the western elites. Kissinger even warned repeatedly not to antagonize Russia but the boomers and Gen X guys at the state department refused to listen.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-19T06:28:02+00:00

Yup. Not getting this one and I wonder be surprised if this ''vaccine'' requires you to literally take it up the ass.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-19T04:45:58+00:00

FSB is very incompetent

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-18T16:44:23+00:00

It might achieve a noble cause as well- reducing Africa's population.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-18T16:44:01+00:00

WTF did I just see?

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-18T16:10:56+00:00

So Bantus in Africa fucked monkeys or some other animal in the ass and contracted this disease from them?

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-18T06:06:34+00:00

u/NeoRail

u/Markimus

u/Ethnocrat

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-18T06:01:02+00:00

play Paradox games and fantasise about how cool their favourite historical period is and how definitely not hot their favourite King/Emperor/Kaiser was and how much they definitely don't want to have sex with him.

Lol, I don't think there are that many gays in this circle. Gays are warmly accepted nowadays in the liberal mainstream. They're almost an aristocratic group nowadays.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-18T05:58:27+00:00

That's an implicitly philosophical approach, though. In order to know what system suits your aims, you first need to articulate what those aims are. It's about means and ends. Philosophy, or perhaps, a specific category of philosophy, deals with the ends and provides the principles. The implementation is what is left up to practice.

Fair point. I'll concede that what your objective is shaped by thought and philosophy.

I personally have somewhat of a crude and grug view of this. In my mind, the government's job is to ensure that dharma or the right order of the world is maintained in the state. This right order of the world is essentially making a moral society and ensuring outcomes that are in line with morality.

How do you derive morality you say? Imo, true and objective morality can only derive from two sources:

A. Biological adaptiveness: That which is good for the survival and flourishing of the group and the individual is good and moral. Things like patriarchy, nationalism, strong families, moralizing art and culture, eugenics, martial values and a culture of masculinity. That which is maladaptive for the group is immoral/evil. Feminism, cosmopolitanism, post-modern art, sexual degeneracy, dysgenics, pacifism and hedonism for example.

B. Natural law: There are certain patterns that repeat in history. Societies that abandon values like patriarchy, asabiya, nationalism, religiosity, worship of ancestors, martial values, eugenics, modesty and martial values decline and collapse. Those that abide by them flourish. You gauge from this that it is God's will that these values be adhered to. This is how the universe is designed and you must abide by these principles. It is the right order of things.

Both these viewpoints are essentially the same thing and are different routes to the same destination. If you are of a scientific persuasion and you prefer reason and solid evidence, you can take the Darwinian approach. If you don't like such materialism and prefer a more spiritual outlook on the world, take the natural rights approach.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T15:18:11+00:00

ancient Hellenic thought, Heidegger, Traditionalism and his own weird spiritual, mythological and geopolitical ideas about a semi-pagan, semi-Christian Eurasian empire etc. When he starts talking about stuff like "Dark Logos" and other such nonsense it becomes extremely obvious that he's gone off the deep end.

It's just a bunch of nonsense. I disapprove of this whole philosophical approach to statesmanship and politics altogether. You form states or systems in consideration of what's practical. Are these borders practical economically, demographically, and militarily? Will this system of government/societal organization help me achieve my aim?

States that build themselves around trying to conform to a philosophy and ideology are unsuccessful for the most part. Nazism, Bolshevism, and the French revolutionary regime all fell due to this flaw.

In the Soviet Union, the party's desire to stay true to the teachings of Marx and the spirit of communism prevented it from ever undertaking the necessary reforms and making the USSR an economically viable empire. It ultimately collapsed due to this.

In Nazi Germany, Hitler's obsession with seizing land from the slavic untermenschen led to brutal treatment of the slavic peoples of the USSR. People that could've been allies against bolshevism. It also barred the Germans from ever managing to reach an honorable and separate peace with the USSR. Hitler to his last days held onto his retarded delusions about striking a deal with his Germanic English cousins.

France similarly drove out the country's upper class and brought the country to civil war and economic collapse due to their obsession with individual liberty and destroying the catholic church.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T12:58:53+00:00

Spencer fags include him, Dugin and his gay lover Mark Brahmin. There's also some cringe accounts on twitter that push macronism: Eurohegemonist, DSA ubermensch (lol) etc. I seriously wonder at times if these are just Spencer alts.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T12:48:33+00:00

even if they, like me, know nothing about Dugin and Duginism.

Same here. I literally know nothing about Duginism, haven't read his books, nor do I intend to, and couldn't sit through ten minutes of any of his interviews. He's just another Christian imbecile who fabricates grand and labyrinthine fantasy narratives to tiptoe around the real issue of race and Zog.

Plus, what these retards don't know is that Dugin is a nobody in Russia. He's such a nobody that he was fired even from his sociology professorship at Moscow state. This is supposedly the grey eminence of Russia who's serving as Putin's brain.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T12:02:03+00:00

the Golden One takes a more nuanced position, he's closer to neutral

The closer one is to the Russian giant, the less friendly he looks. Europe is right to fear Russian expansion but sadly, Russian occupation is the only hope Europeans have at this point to stave off genocide by their own ZOG governments. A new iron curtain. The last one kept Eastern Europe white.

I have no faith in populist movements like RN or Brothers of Italy saving Europe. Western Europeans are by and large spiritually dead people and they can only be saved through subjugation by fellow Europeans.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T11:59:41+00:00

A US general got caught recently in Azovstahl. A recently retired Candain General with a rape allegation got caught as well. During the helicopter evacuation, an AFU helicopter was shot down and two French intel officers were there as well. Many Ukrainian army units are being commanded by Western officers. The failed raid on Snake Island left behind several dead western officers.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T11:26:37+00:00

Instead, they did the exact opposite, running headfirst into battle and senselessly getting destroyed for globohomo.

They didn't run into battle. They were stationed in Mariupol for years and it was very close to the front. They got encircled along with 12,000 other Ukrainian army units in the opening week of the offensive. On day 4, Mariupol was encircled and within the pocket was Azov and 4 other Ukrainain brigades.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T11:24:49+00:00

Frodi Midfjord, Golden One, Richard Spencer and his fags, Greg Johnson, Thuletide, Apollonian Germ etc.

The majority of DR figures are pro-Russia but a lot of followers are obsessed with duginist conspiracy theories and asiatic bolshevik Russia and Putin is controlled by Jewish oligarchs bs.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T08:28:01+00:00

It's very true. There have been Jews in Azov since the start. There are Israeli mercenaries in Ukraine.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T08:10:02+00:00

I will never understand this obsessive DR hatred of Russia. They're literally an 85-90% white country that isn't anti-white and that is fighting Zog in pursuit of their nationalist interests. But still, half the DR thinks it's still the USSR or Putin is a shabbos goy.

Even Jazzhands reversed his earlier position and is now firmly pro-Russia. Striker had the correct take on this for the longest time.

Thuletard and Apollonian germ had been and probably still are pushing the Duginist nonsense.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-17T03:18:35+00:00

State power is all that matters. White South Africans can make their lovely little communities and businesses over decades and it will take one marxist government to seize all of that and sic the negro hordes on them Question is, do these white communities have weapons and armed militias? Would they have the strength to defy the SA government diktats?

What if the government sics the army on them?

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-16T15:16:03+00:00

TRS should do a video on him. Mark and TRS are too lenient towards him.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-16T08:02:28+00:00

Many of your countrymen have been killed in Ukraine. Apparently several high ranking intelligence and military officers as well. Thoughts?

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-16T06:59:02+00:00

Wasn't Chris shilling for Trump back in the day?

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-13T19:13:25+00:00

This astute thinker always catches the narrative by the throat....5 years after it appears.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-13T05:19:54+00:00

The thing with peddling vice is that sooner or later, the peddler himself indulges in it. If you throw mud, eventually, it will cover your own body as well. We see that with the Jews today who become fags and trannies themselves.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-13T05:18:44+00:00

This. It's as simple as this. Often, there's no need for complex philosophical ponderings. The decisions are very simpe and straight forward.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-13T05:17:01+00:00

An AI overlord could run things for thousands of years. Life standards would go grow unbelievably shit but nig nogs are used to that. An AI-run state would be incredibly resilient as it would be run rationally and efficiently without the various psychological and mental neuroses and decay that mark human societies.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-12T16:52:20+00:00

Try telegram

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-12T16:07:05+00:00

blaq niggro

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-11T22:55:18+00:00

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-11T07:40:33+00:00

After the events of the last year, I've unsubscribed from the more radical Jewish conspiracy mindset.

They operate according to a mindset and a revolutionary/cultural vandalism spirit.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-10T05:47:00+00:00

Tout est finis

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-10T04:38:35+00:00

Musk is the only normal billionaire as far as I can see. He does what you'd expect a billionaire to do:

Date hot women. Have lots of kids. Pursue grand visions. Have fun in general.

The other Goy billionaires like Gates, Bezos, and Rockefeller are a bunch of weirdos.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-06T06:05:40+00:00

The mistake is calling it abortion. It should be called what it is - Women's filicidal privilege.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-06T06:04:52+00:00

Give me a fucking break. These issues collectively don't account for 2% of abortions.

The overwhelming majority of abortions are done for economic and career reasons.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-06T06:02:51+00:00

I just want to ask them this: "Imagine someone kicks a pregnant woman in the belly and causes a miscarriage. Let's say the mother feels like it was good that she was rid of the child. Should it be considered murder considering that the woman feels like it was good that she lost the baby?"

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-06T06:00:34+00:00

You honestly think Tyrone is going to riot and burn down his neighborhood because pink haired feminists are angry?

No, but shlomo will, and he runs antifa.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-06T05:59:49+00:00

The fact alt righters think this is great illustrates the problem with a movement that almost exclusively consists of males, a high percentage of whom are probably incels. I hate to be an asshole, but thats just the reality of it.

Any dissident worth his salt would support the destabilization of the system. If the left goes apeshit and starts a bigger ruckus than the summer of Floyd, it will further drive the US into a tailspin, especially considering that its in the grip of an inflationary spiral.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-05T16:42:49+00:00

Lol. Imagine if the libs start riots and burn down their own cities in the midst of an inflationary crisis over this fake and gay story. Would be the ideal comedy.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T18:42:18+00:00

Phosgene is for gentlemen

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T17:02:13+00:00

Let's hope Iran has some poison gas or dirty bombs in store as well.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T17:01:44+00:00

Le Pen lost in France. Italy is still in the hands of the left, so are Germany, Sweden, and all other European countries.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T15:09:16+00:00

Is that you Nick Fuentes?

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T13:51:16+00:00

Israel is in for a rough future. It's becoming very cramped and becoming full of unproductive crazies. The Ukraine war was a godsend for them because it transferred a lot of Ukrainian and Russian Jews to Israel. But it's not enough and Europe has few Jews left to give. The remaining ones are mostly old.

Israel is seeing a strong push to the radical right due to demographics and it's not impossible that some nutjob Prime minister in the future will start a massive war with Arabs.

The greater Israel project was their chance for Lebensraum by taking over Syrian land. The hope was that ISIS would defeat Assad and take over Syria and depopulate it in the process. This would allow Israel to invade and settle the new terrorist state. Russia and Iran put an end to that.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T13:29:49+00:00

https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/461656/Iran-s-fertility-rate-alarmingly-low

Israel's stellar TFR is due to 10% haredi jews who don't work, live on gibs and don't serve in the military. Jewish amish essentially. In addition, 25% of their population is composed of Muslim arabs who have far higher birth rates than non-haredi Jews. Arab Jews like Mizrahim have somewhat higher birth rates as well.

However, non-haredi ashkenazi Jews who built Israel and continue to run it have low TFRs. There's no specific data on them but there is one representative data: Russian Jews in Israel have a TFR of 1.5 or lower.

Jewish women have the lowest TFRs of any group in Russia and the US.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T13:26:10+00:00

The radical right is basically institutionalized in most of Europe at this poin

This is cope. I don't see it anywhere and populist parties are heavily censored and persecuted by the state-finance complex.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T13:12:30+00:00

https://nypost.com/2019/09/26/birth-control-pills-may-affect-you-are-attracted-to-experts-say/

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T12:54:46+00:00

He appoints the ambassador.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T12:54:04+00:00

No, Africa is seen birth rate falls as well.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T12:53:39+00:00

The thing is that America is electorally lost anyways and even if it weren't voting for the GOP is a dead end. Penny pinching on 51% and 50.5% non-Hispanic white America leads you nowhere. It's irrelevant when 3 million immigrants come to the US every year.

White must think in absolute terms, in terms of influence and power rather than electoral trivialities. Jews don't care whether the percentage of Jews in the US is 2.6% or 2.1%. They control the levers of power and exert complete control over cultural and social life.

Whites must think in absolute terms and think of preserving their race in the long run. The mindset shouldn't be to try to flash freeze the white percentage of the US at 56% or 55%, it should be to preserve the absolute number of whites(190 million).

Eliminating abortion gives you millions of more blacks but it also gives you a similar number of whites. It helps you maintain that 190 million number and thus maintain strength on absolute numbers.

The fewer whites there are in the world in absolute numbers, the weaker whites are overall and the rarer they become. Without abortion, there would probably be 20-30 million more blacks, but there also would be 20-30 million more whites as well.

20-30 million blacks make as much of an impact as 200-300 million blacks. 20-30 million whites can change the world (Britain in 1820 had a population of 15 million)

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T02:16:23+00:00

The constitution was admirable to some degree in its first draft when it restricted voting to land-owning white males only. The continuous amendments over time have rendered it into a shitshow.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T02:13:51+00:00

The thing is that America is electorally lost anyways and even if it weren't voting for the GOP is a dead end. Penny pinching on 51% and 50.5% non-Hispanic white America leads you nowhere. It's irrelevant when 3 million immigrants come to the US every year.

White must think in absolute terms, in terms of influence and power rather than electoral trivialities. Jews don't care whether the percentage of Jews in the US is 2.6% or 2.1%. They control the levers of power and exert complete control over cultural and social life.

Whites must think in absolute terms and think of preserving their race in the long run. The mindset shouldn't be to try to flash freeze the white percentage of the US at 56% or 55%, it should be to preserve the absolute number of whites(190 million).

Eliminating abortion gives you millions of more blacks but it also gives you a similar number of whites. It helps you maintain that 190 million number and thus maintain strength on absolute numbers.

The fewer whites there are in the world in absolute numbers, the weaker whites are overall and the rarer they become. Without abortion, there would probably be 20-30 million more blacks, but there also would be 20-30 million more whites as well.

20-30 million blacks make as much of an impact as 200-300 million blacks. 20-30 million whites can change the world (Britain in 1820 had a population of 15 million)

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T00:30:23+00:00

The pill has also enabled the rise of pretty boys and effeminate men. Women feel attracted to these guys when on the pill because the pill puts the female body in a state of false pregnancy. So women at this time feel more attracted to soft and non-threatening guys. When they go off the pill, their normal instincts kick in and they often feel disgusted by their boyfriends/husbands.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T00:28:27+00:00

Urbanization, female access to higher education, and secularism...the three horsemen of depopulation. Chinese TFR is at 1 and Iran and Turkey are at 1.6 now. Wait till modernity fully catches up in India and Mexico. We'll see birth rate collapses beyond imagination.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-04T00:26:52+00:00

Lol, I guess you didn't see his tweet. One of his main points was Mitt Romney was still very handsome. He has the mind of a woman.

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-03T12:22:26+00:00

Hispanic has seen a massive collapse

casparvoneverec · 2022-05-03T12:18:01+00:00

Too little too late. Tens of millions of white kids have already been aborted over the decades and the pill is the leading means of contraception anyways. Would do nothing now.

In any case, I don't think it will amount to much. The liberal establishment is really passionate about this and they'll defeat it in any case.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-29T19:34:40+00:00

No, no mention of her name in the article.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-29T19:11:57+00:00

But if anyone deserves to boast about their wartime achievements, it is the Russians.

One feature is that they emphasize the Eastern front above all else. This is not unjustified however considering that the Eastern Front was the main front of ww2 and other fronts were essentially supplementary to it. 80% of all German losses were against the Soviets and the German armies were destroyed by the Soviets in great battles like Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk, Dnieper, Dnieper-Carpathian offensive, and Bagration.

By the time the allies landed in Normandy, the German army was a half-dead skeleton depleted from years of war with the Soviets.

One can only imagine how much bravado Americans could've shown if say the Soviets had suddenly made peace with Germany the day after Normandy and the Reich was able to transfer 80 divisions west. or if the Americans had merely fought original German divisions at full strength with a full complement of equipment.

I might be wrong here but I think the allied pocket in Normandy would've been contained or crushed against the sea had the Soviets not launched operation Bagration in June and destroyed 43 German divisions and diverted vast numbers of reinforcements to Poland.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-29T19:08:34+00:00

I didn't check but wouldn't be surprised.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-29T19:08:21+00:00

Yes. For most races, war is a contest between two bands of men with contradicting interests. The enemy is not evil, wicked, or immoral for fighting you, he's just pursuing his own interests like you are.

The Jews in contrast have an entitled nature. They are God's chosen people and fighting against them makes you wicked and evil. You are rebelling against their God-given right to abuse the goyim. There must be something psychologically wrong with you.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-29T19:06:21+00:00

Typical Jewish lies

Jews always coasted off the back of other nations. They have no philosophy of war or notion of respect for the enemy.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-29T03:05:56+00:00

How surprising.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-27T22:32:08+00:00

Sarcasm is a large part of my speech.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-27T22:26:01+00:00

They're like Malaria. They kill the host that sustains them.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-27T22:16:37+00:00

Jews are afraid of being replaced by Chinese and Indians at elite positions.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-27T22:16:11+00:00

I was joking. I know this.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-27T19:38:48+00:00

They're afraid that Jews will lose elite positions to high IQ Chinese and Indian immigrants. They want to be the brahmin class.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-27T19:30:52+00:00

Ah, some based leftists. Together with them, we will form the red-brown working class populist alliance!

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-27T13:45:15+00:00

Don't post this demoralization porn man. The black pill from the French election is still fresh.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-26T14:15:24+00:00

True but I don't know if we can win without educated professionals or upper class people. You need men of substance to win. Mechanics and bricklayers are good people and can come in handy but you need the white-collar people to get your foot in institutions and to provide the money required to pull through.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-26T10:21:54+00:00

And "educated" just means indoctrinated.

Yeah, but it also means having money and being in powerful positions.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-25T14:14:15+00:00

You are in the bargaining phase.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-25T13:59:46+00:00

more minorities will come into voting age, more blacks and Arabs will enter France and become citizens. Censorship will be tightened further. Boomers are not all going to croak in 5 years.

casparvoneverec · 2022-04-24T21:08:32+00:00

It's practically over for France. Demographics will make it impossible to win in 2027. Only civil war or coups will be viable then and those are not happening in this cuckhole of a country.

casparvoneverec