all 20 comments

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 9 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

No niggers in my gay bath house- Liberal Nationalism

[–]GConly 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

Yep.

I'm basically left leaning as hell except when it comes to things like immigration and the reality of biology in human life outcomes.

Things like sexuality are down to prenatal hormones, you can't change people's sexual orientation. It's like penalising ginger hair. At best it will just get hidden.

Strict gender roles don't add to productivity. You need your high functioning citizens front and centre no matter what sex they are. If you limit women to the home you'll lose about 1/3 of your functioning super-producers. That's a handicap.

If you want to push against promiscuity on health grounds and for social cohesion, be my guest. Promiscuity spreads disease, and illegitimacy. Both are the problem of the people around you if they have to pay for your mistake with their taxes.

I don't care if you do rec drugs as long as they don't impact your social responsibilities. So as long as you aren't fucking up your health, job, or family, or others quality of life, IDGAF.

I'm not actually a purist on the nationalism. My opinion is:

Humans are naturally racist, we have a strong preference for our own kin and multi racial nations will always be blowing unnecessary resources coping with this stress.

However, this isn't even a patch on the stress you get from multicultural nations. People of different races can function together well enough if they perform similarly re economics and crime, and share similar values. It's why we've not really had integration issues with the Hindu Indians in the UK Vs the Pakistani muslims, who have real issues.

So some global immigration for critical skills and marriage only. Kept at a low level.

You all got to stop using the N word. You're scaring th conservatives who agree with you on a lot of stuff.

[–]sylla94 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

If we can't say the nigger word then what has this whole movement been about? What have we been working towards?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The right to say the n-word shall not be infringed!

[–]GConly 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Then don't be upset when I call you a cheesy cracker.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Louis CK is a bit of a piece of shit but your comment reminds me of this bit so much I have to post it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRDXeinEUJQ

    [–]sylla94 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    lmao

    [–]Courbeaux 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

    You sound more like a cuckservative than a "liberal" in the American sense of "liberal".

    [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    I'm English.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Makes sense. You're just Sargon with a slightly more racialist world view.

    We definitely need a final solution to the Anglo problem of your variety.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    You're just Sargon with a slightly more racialist world view.

    Still better than american zionist cuckservativism.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Still better than american zionist cuckservativism.

    Debatable.

    [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    And how am I a problem?

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Liberalism is moral syphilis.

    [–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    It's not liberal.

    It's libertarian mixed with biological reality and best practice for social stability.

    Want to use drugs? As long as you aren't lowering your work performance, need medical resources to treat you, or are endangering others... no one's business.

    Want kids with no dad? Sure, you're paying for it. The state won't. Same for fathers. You made them, you pay for them. No dodging. Run off and you'll regret it.

    This alone will cut the number of illegitimate kids down to rock bottom.

    Want women to have kids? You'll need to make employment and good childcare compatible with work. There's no need to lock them in the home. This system works perfectly well, and you'll find a lot would rather be home with the kids anyway.

    None of my business who you bang, as long as it's not a public health issue or a kid.

    I'm getting the gay sex thing is a big sticking point... You all need to remember they came out of the womb with that wiring, same as you came out interested in the opposite sex. Their brains are wired differently. You won't end up converting your youth to being gay if you socially accept it. And punishing it is effectively just a waste of time and resources.

    [–]Nombre27 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    If we had city-states instead of nation-states, then you could play around with all the liberalism or totalitarianism that you want to, provided you keep it within your own borders or face consequences. Far too many people want to have their cake (tolerance) and eat it too (not suffer the consequences of that tolerance).

    If we want to live peacefully and be prosperous, then this needs to be addressed. You can't have a society properly function with as much antagonism and division as we currently have.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I agree but I think such political divisions are purely a symptom of modern democracy. I doubt much people would care about their rulers if they weren't being actively prodded to be active spectators in the political realm, for example people in China or Saudi Arabia are more contempt with their rule than America.

    [–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I'm not an anti-liberal purist who jumps on new trendy ideologies every week like being a 3rdPositionTradCathMonarchistMedievalPagan who wants to pretend they can rewind the clock to 1950s America, 1930s Germany, Victorian England, Rome, or whatever. I consider myself more of an 'alt-progressive' than 'trad', really. I don't have a problem with social conservatives, I just don't agree with them on everything.

    I am for embracing technology and making the best of it. I believe in things like eugenics and investing in areas of science like genetic engineering, genuinely 'trad' people have trouble supporting these things. TradCaths I've spoken to are horrified by the idea of things like "designer babies", I see it as a good thing.

    I don't have the perfect system in mind, but one thing I am against is the universal franchise. Most of the population should not be voting. Honestly, most of the voting population are fucking retards, and I include many boomer right-wing voters in that boat along with the woke college student 20-year-olds. Ultimately, who wins elections is whoever is best manipulated.

    I don't have any tolerance for the LGBTQ+XYZ shit like trannies and stuff, but I don't have a problem with homosexuals. There has always been a small minority of men who are homosexual and who have no attraction to women. I don't see any point in forcing them to repress it and con women into marriage when realistically we know they'll be out fucking men in secret and picking up STDs. I don't mind letting them live relatively openly and letting them have a civil partner, but they should be banned from certain roles in society like the military, being prison officers, working in Boy Scouts type organisations.

    I'm against women serving in the military and on 'front line' roles in the police and fire service. Women don't possess the abilities required to overpower criminals or drag people out of burning buildings, but there is nothing wrong with a woman being a detective or something like that. Women should also not be allowed to work in male prisons except as doctors/nurses.

    I think women should generally be encouraged to marry and start having children young, but there is always going to be a segment of the female population who this isn't possible or suitable for. What about unattractive women? I don't mean women who can improve their situation (lose weight, etc), but women who are legitimately well below average? They're probably not going to find husbands. Female 'incels' may not exist, but women who can't get relationships certainly do. Not to mention women who are disabled, mentally ill, unable to have children for biological reasons, etc.

    I don't believe women make natural leaders, they are not suited to run countries and major institutions (I've noticed a trend that they always end up being grotesquely masculinised like Margaret Thatcher, or they get steamrolled when the pressure is on), but I don't go full sperg and suggest they shouldn't take part in politics at all. I do get annoyed when I come across anonymous keyboard warriors who probably do fuck all for any movement shitting on the likes of Laura Towler for being a woman and playing an active political role. That woman does a lot for British ethnonationalism as deputy head of PA.

    Recreational drugs? I've never taken them, not even cannabis, but I think the pragmatic thing to do is legalise and regulate them. The war on drugs is objectively a failure. They can't even keep drugs out of maximum security prisons, you're dreaming if you think even the best Fascist ethnostate can. That being said, I don't think drug shops should be everywhere (it would be banned to open one near a school or near a park for example) and they should not allowed to be open between about 8:00am-8:00pm. It's the sort of thing that should only be in town/city centres near nightclubs, etc. If adults can take them safely and not end up as fuckups, it doesn't bother me.

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Well it depends how you define tradition. To some traditions are just festivals and the little activities you do in them. To others tradition means not just cultural activities but the social orders that come alongside them, such as models of family ties and social etiquette.