all 26 comments

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[deleted]

    [–]NeoRail 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Do you honestly mean to tell me that any other Democrat president would be different? Biden's every move is most probably already entirely directed by his team. He is going to be a puppet president.

    [–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    I think it's kind of obvious that he's just there to get Kamala Harris in. He's going to retire on medical grounds before the 2024 election.

    [–]Richard_Parker 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Do not kid yourself. He will do that before this spring,

    [–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I think he will last at least 6 months if he's able (even if he's not really running the show), I don't think they'll want it to look too obvious that he was just there to carry Kamala Harris in. In any case, I predict he will retire in time to give Harris long enough to gain familiarity with the US public as POTUS and have the 'incumbent advantage' by the time the next election rolls around.

    [–]KangShaka 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I'd put it between 6 months and the mid-term elections. He'll be gone well before 2024. It wouldn't be surprising if Harris did not contend 2024, depending on how well she's polling before the next election. I think she was the preferred primary candidate of... 5%... of Democratic voters. We could be looking at two of the least popular Presidents in American history.

    She has one obvious advantage over Biden in that the various facets of her identity are associated with powers/privileges that Biden simply doesn't have. That is, that Democrats will be forced to be hush about Harris' failings simply because any criticism of her whatsoever is a combination of 'racist' and 'sexist'. On the other hand, those like Biden occupy the lowest rungs of the American power structure. Nobody cares about 'ageism' and that's the only -ism he could realistically accuse his opponents of being. I don't see what he can really hide behind when the criticism (of which there will be a deluge) really begins hitting him.

    I don't even think he'll resign willingly. I think he'll be sidelined out of power, with Kamala rapidly becoming the de facto President (e.g. the one that the media actually want to talk to and whose face is shown on television) and de jure before 2024. Eventually he'll simply be told that his past 'racist' comments and his cognitive decline make him unfit for office and that he has effectively been ousted by the progressive faction. Like an informal no confidence vote. People will just stop listening to him. And that process will be accelerated by the fact that his popularity will be far lower than that of Trump. Unlike Trump, his own 'side' doesn't even like him. At least Trump could rely on the Republican base. The Democrats know that this guy has become a serious liability and that they need to be rid of him fast. He practically embodies everything that Democrats also hate about Trump and he's suddenly developed extra weaknesses in the form of his idiot son and his mental state. They accepted him because he presented himself as a veteran, 'Old Guard' candidate who could dupe enough Republicans into flipping sides at a time where they're about to deliver the coup de grace and desperately need corporate and White voters (i.e. those most likely to oppose them) to remain passive a little longer. You don't want your targets squirming around, but to meekly accept what you're going to do to them.

    Where I might disagree with your comments elsewhere is on the matter of the Democrats developing a supermajority. I think they know that they can defeat the Republicans permanently with a combination of if they, firstly, allow Puerto Rico to vote in the Presidential election, secondly, allow illegals to vote (by changing the law or by naturalizing large numbers of them) or, to a lesser extent, thirdly, have the election decided by popular vote.

    The first option seems a dead-end as it harkens back to the whole colonialism/imperialism/racism thing. The third wouldn't guarantee victories if the Democrats performed so poorly that millions flip sides. The second seems like the obvious way forward and that's why we're already hearing that they intend to do this. Unless the Republicans find a way to prevent this, they'll easily have 2024 and beyond simply by convincing naturalized illegals that another Republican Presidency would reverse it. Desperate to remain in America, they'll be a practically 100% loyal voting bloc.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Harris might get 3 terms. One of Biden's and two of her own

    [–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Interesting reply. I'm inclined to agree re: Biden.

    As for the Democrats developing a supermajority, I would've believed that 6 months ago even, now I'm just not sure. I don't believe they'll ever lose ~90% of the black vote and they seem to have a good hold over the Asian vote (~70%), but 'Hispanics' seem to be a giant question mark. Of course, it's a dumb category anyway, because it comprises of so many different nationalities and race/ethnic groups and lumps them together based on language, but they helped keep Florida and Texas red, even though they helped turn New Mexico, California and even possibly Arizona (we'll see if that's a permanent change) blue.

    [–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I think he'll give up and let Harris be president.

    [–]president_camacho 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You need to watch it with language about "fighting". I dont mean to be the tone police, but the people who put Biden in charge would love nothing better than to put massive numbers of dissidents and nationalists in prison during the next 4 years, and policies like these serve the dual purpose of baiting people into giving them an excuse to do it. Language like that will definitely put this sub and the people who use it on the feds radar, not to mention give them leverage to exercise more censorship, including on sites like this. Think before you type.

    By all means inform people of what is going on. Organize and spread the word as much as possible, but we need dissidents who are calm, rational, logical, and take the long view, not hot headed chicken littles. The gun tax in particular is probably meant to trigger lolberts and magatards into a reaction. Such a tax would be wildly unpopular in an age of astroturfed race riots, oligarch funded efforts to defund police, and the rising crime that results from both. Even a substantial number of liberals are now gun nuts, and such a law would disproportionately affect the lower income gun owners they claim to care about and leave the wealthy unscathed.

    The farm act is a particularly nice touch and shows out radically anti white our overlords have become. I mean it worked so well in Zimbabwe and South Africa didnt it? You cant make this shit up. These people have zero restraint.

    I have to laugh at how saidits front page is full of boomercons and lolberts crying about muh masks and muh covid conspiracies, but doesnt mention shit like this. Conservatives are such unrestrained idiots.

    Also, going to Latin America is just about the dumbest thing you can do. Why would you scatter yourselves to the winds when there are 200 million whites in the US right now? Latin America is notoriously corrupt, do you honestly think Jewish wealth wouldnt reach you there if they wanted? If you want to go to Europe thats fine, but Latin America is a no go unless you're some atomized lolbert.

    People need to keep a calm head and carry on. I get so tired of the hysterical black pillers. The system were stuck in is going to collapse. Just prepare for that eventuality and keep your nose clean in the mean time.

    [–]Minedwe 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I agree, but 'keep your nose clean in the mean time" is practically an impossibility since they demonize us for simply existing, they railroad us for shit we didn't do, they ignore crimes against us and call us at fault for them, and routinely lay out plans to punish us for thoughtcrimes.

    "keep your nose clean" Will mean willingly submitting to slavery or murder, sooner or later. What we should do is keep the vernier of a clean nose, if possible.

    [–]Bagarmoossen 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    Accelerationism is the most retarded thing ever and all the pathetic, cowardly traitors supporting this "worse is better" mindset shouldn't be surprised if they and their children end up in a mass grave a couple of decades from now.

    [–]Nombre27 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Depends on what information you're working with.

    I think self-segregation into sufficiently large communities is the best current solution. It would also be very beneficial for as many Whites as possible to incorporate into a larger entity so that they have greater power, save more of their income, benefits, protections, etc.

    [–]Bagarmoossen 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    A permanent democrat majority makes what you're envisioning much harder, if not impossible. 2020 has been the year freedom as we knew it was killed before our eyes, with little to no backlash from the right-wing. Expect the things such as homeschooling to be targeted next and outlawed if this new paradigm is allowed to stand.

    [–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I doubt there will be a permanent Democrat-majority.

    The Republican Party is actively trying to rebrand itself as a party for non-whites, they've shown that they will throw whites under the bus for an extra 5 black voters. They'll rail against "identity politics" to their White voters (the last thing their Jewish handlers want is racially conscious Whites), while giving thumbs up for shit like "Latinos 4 Trump" and shit like the Platinum Plan for blacks.

    They will abandon every stated principle to do it.

    [–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Perhaps, at least for awhile. The cyclical nature of these events leans towards that majority bloc eventually fracturing.

    I don't doubt there will be an attack on other freedoms. It would be advisable for like-minded people to re-locate and concentrate in a few states. I'm sure different locations have strategic advantages and disadvantages. Access to ports should be one priority.

    [–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I think the idea behind accelerationism is to create a backlash. I'm sceptical over whether it would ever work like that, but conservatives (and I include Trump in that) do nothing either, they just delude people into a false sense of security. It's not even a lesser of two evils situation.

    Can you honestly say it's been better to be a white nationalist (of any stripe) in the last 4 years than pre-Trump (assuming you've been 'redpilled' that long)?

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Accelerationism works from the assumption that whites have the numbers, brain power and assertiveness to fix all the current problems plaguing the republic. They only need to be 'shoved' towards racial awareness in large enough numbers. There will be a point though that whites in North america are too sick, too miscegenated and too demoralized to do anything about the republic. Therefore, there really are only two options for whites: accelerate or disappear.

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    [–]Nombre27 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    There's a few variables and outcomes worth considering.

    How long until a sufficient number of Hispanics realize that they don't need the democrat party to get what they want? Then Blacks, and then maybe even Whites? Another question I have is, are there concessions (lines) to the various groups that the democrat won't cross? If so, then once they reach a breaking point within the democrat party then it follows that you'll see that group go off on it's own.

    There's something to be said about creating a third party as they can have control over the other two if it comes down to having enough votes to enact something, i.e. give us what we want or you won't get what you won't, blocking, etc.

    Agitating for Reconquista of some areas can make sense in this context if it allows the rest of the country to debride itself of the problem areas and people. The problem then is staying the course on agreed borders. Not very optimistic on that.

    [–]WaltzRoommate 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    This was all coming down the pipeline anyways. At least we get to deal with it instead of our children.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    So what's the plan og action then?

    [–]WaltzRoommate 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Idk, but it's not like we had one before.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Either fight, or flee to Europe and Latin America and let America collapse.

    Fleeing is not an option for me personally.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Then are u willing to risk death? It will eventually come to that

    [–]MATKINS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    We'll see, but I doubt it will be that drastic.

    One thing to keep in consideration is that the American left is stunned out at how high Trump's voter turnout was this year. They see their victory as a pyrrhic one. Go over to r/Politics, and you'll see many of them are legit fearful that a significant percentage of America has "fascist" leanings (I know it's amusing, but this is their mentality) and they know that in slightly different circumstances (e.g. no Covid-19), Trump would've won in a landslide. They were hedging their bets on a total repudiation of Trump and a return to a pre-2016 'normalcy'.

    Trump is gone, but they know that someone just like him, or someone further to the right could win again. Hell, he might even run again in 2024 (I doubt that, but you never know). They're going to be very cautious about pushing the boat on policies that get the backs up of their voters.

    They will also need control of the Senate, I'm not American so I don't know the intricacies of that, but I think the GOP are going to maintain a slight majority.

    What you're likely to see is the slow boil. The number of 3rd world refugees admitted to the US skyrocketing, more woke shit entering the discourse, more regime change bombings/wars (Europe can look forward to Migrant Crisis 2.0 by 2022 I'm guessing), etc.

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So he will turn America into Europe?