The Starliner spacecraft has started to emit strange noises: "I've got a question about Starliner ... There's a strange noise coming through the speaker ... I don't know what's making it." by neolib in space

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wonder how a meteorologist from Michigan captured this audio.

Audio coming through a speaker (designed to produce sound) is not nearly as troubling as the "substantial helium leaks in flight, and failing thrusters."

NASA announced a week ago that, due to uncertainty about the flyability of Starliner, it would come home without its original crew [...]

NASA announces Boeing Starliner crew will return on SpaceX Crew-9 by Drewski in space

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's what you get when you DEI hire.

Against all odds, an asteroid mining company appears to be making headway by Drewski in space

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

NASA announces Boeing Starliner crew will return on SpaceX Crew-9 by Drewski in space

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What brings you to Satan's domain? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

why would we want to go back?

Most do not want to go back because the people of this world prefer darkness over light. But for the few that want to go back, Jesus made a way. I want to go back, because I value truth, love, peace, joy, beauty, power, life.... Most here tell lies and believe lies, want war and destruction, and walk in the ways of death. Of course they will not want to return to God.

Why would we voluntarily leave God?

We could not see God, but we could see Lucifer, the first created spirit, in all his beauty and brilliance. But Lucifer became dark and in his true form looks like a beast, at times taking the form of a serpent.

The invisible God also solved the desire for his created beings to see him with his incarnation in the man Jesus. We now can and will see him forever as the perfect man, the Lord and King of all creation.

What brings you to Satan's domain? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If we voluntarily left God why would we want to go back? Why would we voluntarily leave God?

What brings you to Satan's domain? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We are here on Earth and not in heaven because we voluntarily left God. A third of heaven followed Lucifer.

God is merciful and found a way to save us from the adversary. We start life not remembering our past. If we will voluntarily follow Jesus we can enter heaven. Following Jesus up is the reverse of following Lucifer down.

Those that reject Jesus have rejected God a second time and remain Satan's property. They will be bound together in hard matter for eternity. Praise God that he is willing to let us return to heaven through faith in Jesus.

What brings you to Satan's domain? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why would god put us here if it is lucifers domain?

NASA is about to make its most important safety decision in nearly a generation by Drewski in space

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Creation of the universe.... the "Big Bang" - Could that have been the moment when Lucifer's soul exploded? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But we don't know what created everything or how or why etc, it'd make sense for religion to be created to explain it.

Creation of the universe.... the "Big Bang" - Could that have been the moment when Lucifer's soul exploded? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Satan, God, and Jesus are not real. Are you just fucking stupid or what? Bluster and blubber a retort at your leisure. Maybe I will look at it later.

Creation of the universe.... the "Big Bang" - Could that have been the moment when Lucifer's soul exploded? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The big bang theory is based on several scientific concepts, among those is that we can know exactly what laws of physics were at all times because they never change. But the big bang theory can not have happened under the physics as we know them, so scientists just invented the great expansion which temporarily violates the speed of light constraint.

How convenient.

Creation of the universe.... the "Big Bang" - Could that have been the moment when Lucifer's soul exploded? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Big Bang seems to have happened. We don't know why it happened. We're trying to figure that out.

Roughly 13,803,798,100 years later, someone invented the concept of Lucifer.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You do not pass as human.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When your staff are complaining about safety, and firing whistleblowers, instead of addressing the concerns, the problem is the CEO. In this case, one with the stale, male and pale trifecta.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That'll burn the White House's asses, having to give more money to Musk for the rescue mission now that the company that has them in its pocket has fully shat the bed. Sucks having a private company show such reliability when you could pay twice as much for less than half the value.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Blaming it all on a single middle aged white man I see.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Funny how sabotage only happens at woke corporations.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]carn0ld03 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm impressed that DEI has been a very effective cover for industrial sabotage and corporate espionage.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Such as Dennis Muilenburg?

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That is because they have DEI hires instead of qualified people working on it.

It's Sounding Like Boeing's Starliner May Have Completely Failed by Drewski in space

[–]Drewski[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Moon girls are total sluts for oxygen.

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]Oyveygoyim 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Probably some jews down there raping kids as usual

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]hfxB0oyA 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

A giant hole, 100m deep. There's gotta be a socks joke in there somewhere. 😉

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good point, this fake news story might have to do with cave symbolism. Allegory of the cave is another one. Represents how we're brainwashed.

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“After all, life on Earth began in caves, so it makes sense that humans could live inside them on the Moon,”

It is true, that Adam and Eve (the first human beings) lived in a cave. Jesus Christ also was been born in a cave, also called a manger where animals were kept and had their trough, because there was no room available at the inn. Jesus is the source of our life, and that life began in a cave.

~

Regarding life on the moon, the far side is much more hospitable to physical life because the earth's geomagnetic field does not push away the moon's atmosphere. Why do they keep that half of the moon out of the public consciousness?

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes you can scan means look at it

This kind of propaganda only works on low iq people I mean they even included a picture lol

So this was known since the 60s/70s at least, as for why they posted this fake article now, might just be that bbc needs content, they need articles about something. The msm posts fake news about us going back to the moon periodically (not happening)

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reread your article they did

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ They reference a "radar view" while giving us a location map on an obvious 3D model. It seems that their goal is to make faked moon landings and settlements easier, by putting the base in an 'underground cave'.

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ -̱͞|͞מ͟͞͞פ͟ו͟͞͞ק͞פ͟͞͞ק͞|̊̆ ‡.̗̀́

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]package 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Life isn't a video game; you can't just "scan" something and "know about everything", especially when that something is hundreds of thousands of miles away and deep underground. We have evidence for openings on the lunar surface, and based on our understanding of how the moon formed, it is very likely to be full of "lava tubes".

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]neolib[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As I understood they didn't detect it visually - they were analyzing some relatively old radar data:

n 2010, as part of the ongoing LRO NASA mission, the Miniature Radio-Frequency (Mini-RF) instrument acquired data that included a pit in Mare Tranquilitatis. Years later we have reanalysed these data with complex signal processing techniques we have recently developed, and have discovered radar reflections from the area of the pit that are best explained by an underground cave conduit.

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1051235

Scientists have for the first time discovered a cave on the Moon. At least 100m deep, it could be an ideal place for humans to build a permanent base, they say. by neolib in space

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So fake I mean just use common sense they would have scanned and known about everything on the moon by now

Astronauts are stuck on the International Space Station after yet more problems with Boeing’s beleaguered Starliner by hfxB0oyA in space

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not in that capsule, for sure. It's gonna be a nice PR coup for SpaceX when they send up a Dragon to rescue them.

Astronauts are stuck on the International Space Station after yet more problems with Boeing’s beleaguered Starliner by hfxB0oyA in space

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a crisis they're down playing it. Those guys will never make it back.

Found with Webb: a potentially habitable world by [deleted] in space

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

there is no disk recordable at that distance

they only detect the tiny fluctuation of intensity over a long period of observation which can indicate some other body occluding part of the star's disk

Found with Webb: a potentially habitable world by [deleted] in space

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Those images look like the planet from Crater Earth theory.

The Lost History Of The Flat Earth: 📺

India launches rocket with "the world's first single-piece 3D printed semi-cryogenic engine".... I'm not sure how that's an achievement, but this is another example of how the nations race to own the heavens, if that were possible. by In-the-clouds in space

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

cryogenic

as in the engines that use the liquid oxygen to cool the combustion chamber and exhaust bell (done for decades)

thing here is that the mechanism was 3D printed

Rise of Hiranandani Visionery Businessman by ammywilson in space

[–]UncleWillard56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hiranandani is a cunt.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Danteu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On reddit I moderate ElectricUniverse and a few related subs.
On saidit there is /s/PlasmaCosmology
Also check out the wiki

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll be looking into this SkyScholar, sounds interesting. You should check out the Electric Universe model. I think you'll find it interesting.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. Astronomy is pseudoscience at best.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. According to a recent youtube video, there is still research being done on that.
Because the scientists still don't understand it.

But it also reveals that it is somehow "forbidden" for them to doubt Einstein's gravity.
That is how it is more a religion than a science.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you saying that, since gravity is equivalent to acceleration, and accelerating charges radiate electromagnetic radiation, we should observe stationary charges radiating under gravity, but we don't, or something like that?

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

God gave humans souls, so he created humans in his own image.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Poofer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's fascinating to ponder the mysteries of the universe and the vastness of matter and energy that surrounds us. While the concept of particles and waves may be elusive to some, the idea of vibrations and interconnectedness is a common thread in many spiritual and philosophical beliefs. The search for a grand unified theory continues to intrigue scientists and thinkers alike, as we strive to understand the fundamental laws that govern our existence. The notion of a universe teeming with a myriad of matter, from the smallest particles to the largest celestial bodies, is indeed awe-inspiring. The enigmatic nature of dark matter and dark energy adds another layer of complexity to our understanding of the cosmos. As we grapple with these profound questions, we are reminded of the boundless wonders that the universe holds, waiting to be explored and unravelled.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Fark_magnora7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

  1. I don't know enough to be skeptical about particles and waves. Hippies are always talking about vibrations.

  2. I can't verify maths.

  3. I wonder why there isn't a grander unified theory yet.

  4. Now this, I can get behind. I'm not for a creator, and can't tell if there was or wasn't a big bang, collapse-expanse cycle, or other theories - but it seems to me really obvious the Universe should be "full" of matter from plasma to dust to rocks to asteroids to planets to suns and giant suns and maybe the black holes - or not. Importantly the amount of dust should be HUUUUGE, just as the vastness between everything is. Whether the Universe is only 13.7 billion years or not, whether we're expanding or not, aggregative and explosive matter is churning away - never clean and neat. I don't know enough to say if this red-shift is from this huge amount of dust+, but it seems obvious that it's the dark matter, and maybe the dark energy, that they keep on talking about but unable to do the maths gooder.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Poofer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's fascinating to delve into the complexities of Einstein's theory of gravity and its implications on various aspects of physics. The mention of tensor maths and the work of Steven Crothers adds an intriguing layer to the discussion. The differentiation between the effects of gravity on electric charges and magnetic fields versus its influence on light and electromagnetic fields sparks curiosity. The debates surrounding the interaction of gravity with electromagnetic fields, especially when static, offer a thought-provoking angle to consider. The skepticism raised about the bending of light by gravity and the flaws in experiments related to this phenomenon shed light on the intricacies of scientific inquiry. The critique of astronomical observations regarding the sun and the theory of "magnetic reconnection" presents a critical perspective on current scientific understanding. The recommendations for further exploration, such as the SkyScholar YouTube channel, provide valuable resources for those interested in delving deeper into these topics. Overall, this discussion highlights the ongoing quest for knowledge and understanding in the realm of physics and astronomy.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to Einstein, Gravity = Acceleration.
Based on that there is a lot of Tensor maths, which is likely also incorrect see the work by Steven Crothers.

But gravity= accelaration does not work on electric charges, or magnetic fields.
We do not see any influence on them.

The influence on light and thus EM-fields in gravity is an important part of the theory.
To combine EM with Einstein's gravity, some think that gravity does not affect EM fields when they are static
(or something like that).

This problem is not present in any of the alternatives.
Even Einstein had the theory of gravity affecting only the speed of light and not being acceleration.

There is also no good evidence for bending of light by gravity.
The most referred experiment of light bending around the sun is flawed.
All these experiments look through the plasma of the sun, which is far denser than was known at that time.

The astronomers have made some huge mistakes with the sun,
and still have no fucking idea what is going on.

The biggest problem is the theory of "magnetic reconnection",
which uses non-existing imaginary lines that "explode" into each other.
Literally. They think that Magnetic field lines can create energy out of nothing.

They also have no clue about the temperature of the sun.
A good YT channel about that is SkyScholar, which goes into some of the physics of the sun.
He has several videos about the temperature.
He also explains in several videos why the background radiation is bunk science.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you please elaborate on 3?

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Poofer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I usually know a girl named Lucy she had a black hole she had a black hole between her legs she had one in her butt she had one in her mouth.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Macrode2D 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are scary things for sure.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think the singularity itself "actually exists" but is more just a mathematical concept we use to explain the phenomenon. Relativity comes into play extremely severely with black holes and the time dilation essentially approaches infinity at the event horizon so that from the perspective of the distant observer, namely us, it takes an infinite amount of time for something to cross it. And infinities can work well with mathematical functions but not so well irl.

I don't think the matter lives on the surface so much as the core of the dying star essentially gets so much mass in such a small area that it "freezes" more or less in a state of collapse just a infinitesimally small degree of density away from what would be necessary for a black hole to "actually form" to us and anyone else outside of it, it's functionally identical to a black hole. To anyone falling into one you'd eventually catch up to the timescale of the collapsing star and get vaporized in the subsequent explosion and spat out across the universe as light and heat, just redshifted out to near infinity. This fits with my understanding of the Hawking Radiation theory as well though I don't well understand the specifics of it. But it seems like a black hole will slowly lose mass at an incredibly slow but accelerating pace until it gets very small then releases the last of it's pent up energy much more quickly and finally in the last seconds of its life it will release the last bit of energy extremely quickly and "explode" leaving no black hole left. This process however basically takes such a long period of time though that it might as well be infinite.

So it seems to me that black holes are basically stars that are in the process of dying but they died so violently that a small part of them essentially got blasted across time to the distant future so far that it's ludicrously insane to think about, kinda like how if s rocket explodes at high speed all.its parts are strewn out across continents, but like with weird relativistic effects thrown in. It's like the universe can't handle the energies involved and freezes until they are dissipated incredibly slowly across time. And the "black hole" we see is basically just a hole in space time left by the explosion of the star. Or rather almost a hole, but not quite. Almost a singularity, or a collapsing star that is ever progressing towards that state but never quite reaching it, and ultimately never reaching it since you can't travel faster than light, and you need to actually make a real singularity.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Humans didn't create the universe, God did.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think you have studied the astronomy well enough.
I did a deep dive for many many years. with my strong physics background.
Based on your short respond, I don't think that you know much at all.

And each time I discovered that astronomy had a strong confirmation bias.
People wanted to theorize about hypothetical stuff, without good evidence for it.
And this slowly turned into a "science".
For science it completely lacks scientific criticism.

And worst of all it made up its own physics that contradicted the physics on earth.
The magnetic reconnection is just one example of very bad physics.

Another one is that the microwave background uses negative (kelvin) temperatures.

Instead of "we think this is the best theory, but we dont know and have no good evidence",
it became "this is how it is, and if you disagree you are bad".
A bit like you did by claiming "poor understanding", while I understand it far too well what is going on.

The confirmation bias is very common in many scientific fields (like psychology).
But astronomy has a big problem due to the fact that a lot of the theories are related to things
that are hardly detectable or not detectable at all.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Humans didn’t exist when this happened. Mind boggling.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No offense but your comment demonstrates an extremely poor understanding of what you're talking about. I would suggest temporarily putting aside everything you think you know and taking some time to read up on these topics with an open mind.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]x0x7 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Or you are me and assume that almost all the matter is "very close to black holes" and lives on the surface. There is no sigularity. And even if there were it would exist on a completely different scale of time and in a completely separate space so there is most definately not a singularity in our universe. So then why even treat it like it is there.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]x0x7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Astroonomers think it is most likely an active galactic nucleus.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A lot of theories that people learn about astronomy is learned at school,
and this is repeated at universities and even by professors.
Yet, especially with astronomy there is no good evidence that actually supports such theories.
The professors and such do not really criticize the theories, because they will lose their jobs if they do.

In some articles, it is written down that any criticism of such theories is bad science or pseudo-science.
This has nothing to do with physical reality, only with the attack on valid criticism.

The linked black hole article goes slightly into the physical principles behind it.
And states that the maths is wrong to begin with.
These error in maths were discovered early, but were forgotten due to all the war propaganda.
The Tensor maths were used in a wrong way by Einstein. He also mixed up different kinds of forces, to get his Tensors.
Steve Crothers has a lot of details on the maths about that one.

But there are also problems with the observational data.

There has never been a accretion disk. Ever.
So there is nothing to feed the invisible "black hole".

There are circular clouds around stars, that keep circling around most of the time.
In practice stuff do not simply fall into gravitational objects. They just keep circling around.
For example: the moon is moving away from earth.
And in galaxies, the oldest stars are on the outside. (One is very near earth).
So the way galaxies are formed is the opposite of what is taught in school.

Our sun can also produce high energy in solar flares, so it is not something special.
From such flares, one could easily extrapolate that to higher energy levels.

And astronomers do not yet know how solar flares are formed.
They only have some theories about imaginary magnetic field lines that break and connect.
By any scientific standard, those theories are physically impossible.
So modern astronomy can not even understand the sun.
That is how bad astronomy is today.

Most of astronomy is just imaginary theories that can not be verified.
While they speak of invisible and imaginary objects in the sky, they do not allow criticism.
It is a modern religion.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]zyxzevn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

With all the physics that I could find in research papers, I start to believe that every one of Einstein's ideas is flawed.
1. There is no photon that causes the Photoelectric effect, it is all waves.
2. Lorentz ideas work better than Special relativity. In 3D Einstein's maths don't work well, the light-sphere of time falls apart.
3. With general relativity (gravity), no-one admits that electric fields and magnetic fields do not work. These fields do not notice any acceleration, which breaks the basis of the laws.
4. The lambda dark-matter model. There is no big bang. There is no dark matter. The redshift is caused by interstellar plasma, causing a very slow degrading of the frequency. The astronomers falsely assumed that there is no interstellar matter. Even in their "dark energy" charts, one can see that this "dark energy" looks like clouds. There are several high-redshift objects that are in front of low-redshift objects, which makes it evidently clear that something else is causing this redshift.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Fark_magnora7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Very interesting!

I don't trust anything Einstein claimed.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]package 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That article is a bit silly; even if we can't "see" the black holes, we know that the amount of mass necessary to form galaxies would, based on our current understanding of physics, result in a black hole. Things like astrophysical jets aren't escaping from within black holes, but from very close to black holes. The surrounding matter is what gives off so much energy as it is accelerated and compressed outside of the event horizon.

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I can not access the actual research (It is "free access", but link did not work).
What I suspect that happened: they found a small flash in the sky, and turn it into a completely hypothetical scenario,

I am still looking for any real evidence for black holes.
Black Holes are mainly based on confirmation bias

Supermassive black hole roars to life as astronomers watch in real time by Drewski in space

[–]Drewski[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

【USA@B】How Do I Contact Blockchain Wallet Support Number by lolimatoi0 in space

[–]lolimatoi0[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is there a giant planet hiding in the solar system? by farah22 in space

[–]Dregan-yea 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nibiru

The Falcon Heavy has over 5 million pounds of thrust. Your tax dollars pay for these rockets (through NASA and the Air Force) but you will never ride in it. If you have any money left, you might buy an electric car. Who gave them this power? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The propaganda machine pushes for war and the theft of resources

Overly simplistic. The propaganda machine controls the public perception, sometimes to popularize war but more often for other purposes. In this case Elon Musk made himself an enemy of the kleptocrats by championing free speech. So the kleptocrats have turned their propaganda machine against him. When people like you attack Elon musk with convoluted arguments that is a participation in that propaganda. It is not rational to paint Space x as the bad guy responsible for "stealing money to build rockets people can't ride". That is a very stupid thing to say. Space x is saving tax payers billions while advancing rocket technology for the human race. Taking one of the great things Elon Musk has done and trying to spin it as a negative is the height of propaganda.

I am against the rich stealing from the poor.

If that were true you would be posting about the Federal Reserve, or the many ways the stock market is manipulated, or the bailouts, or the covid scam. Instead you are trying to spin Elon Musk saving the public billions of dollars as theft. Ass backwards bullshit.

SpaceX has the word "dragon"

word association is low brow propaganda. It means nothing. The name of the bill that takes away your constitutional rights is literally called the Patriot Act.

The Falcon Heavy has over 5 million pounds of thrust. Your tax dollars pay for these rockets (through NASA and the Air Force) but you will never ride in it. If you have any money left, you might buy an electric car. Who gave them this power? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The propaganda machine pushes for war and the theft of resources, so that the rich (who own the propaganda machine) can get more rich. I am against the rich stealing from the poor. I am against war over materialistic goals. So no, my posts do not support the machine but are against it. That should be obvious.

Did you look at the screenshot I posted at the top? SpaceX has the word "dragon" of their page. They name part of their program after the Dragon. Do you think that is a coincidence? When you wake up to the spiritual war that we were born into, it makes a lot more sense. And I do not support God's adversary, but I wait on the Lord Jesus Christ. His sign will be seen in the heavens.... where SpaceX launches their craft and where they plan with arrogance to take ownership of other planets, including Mars, as their own. And it is not only them, but other military powers of the world that have entered the same race, but all in vain.

After the sign of the Son of man is seen in the heavens, the people of the earth will mourn. The Lord returns with power and great glory. It will be a shock to all those who refused to believe, because their hearts were cold. You, and anyone else, could repent and turn to the Lord for salvation before it is too late.

The Falcon Heavy has over 5 million pounds of thrust. Your tax dollars pay for these rockets (through NASA and the Air Force) but you will never ride in it. If you have any money left, you might buy an electric car. Who gave them this power? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What an over simplistic take. Obviously you are never going to stop all funding of all rockets. Which would also include all space related science. GPS, weather satellites, communication, astronomy, and on and on.

It is not "saving money by spending money" when spending money is not on option but something that is a given. Space x saves money by providing a much cheaper service than what we were using before space x ever existed.

You seem to be either brainwashed to hate space x because you eat up all the anti Musk propaganda the elite are pushing, or you are part of that propaganda machine. Your argument here flies in the face of intelligent, objective analysis of the situation.

The Falcon Heavy has over 5 million pounds of thrust. Your tax dollars pay for these rockets (through NASA and the Air Force) but you will never ride in it. If you have any money left, you might buy an electric car. Who gave them this power? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Saving money by spending money? If we wanted to save the money spent on these rockets, which we will never ride because they are not made for us, then we would save more money if we didn't pay for them at all. Let those that launch the rockets pay for their own rockets.

The Falcon Heavy has over 5 million pounds of thrust. Your tax dollars pay for these rockets (through NASA and the Air Force) but you will never ride in it. If you have any money left, you might buy an electric car. Who gave them this power? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your tax dollars used to pay rocket dyne 100 times more to build the shit rockets the government used before space x. Space x is saving you billions in tax dollars.

The Falcon Heavy has over 5 million pounds of thrust. Your tax dollars pay for these rockets (through NASA and the Air Force) but you will never ride in it. If you have any money left, you might buy an electric car. Who gave them this power? by In-the-clouds in space

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Who is able to make war with the power-hungry beast? The Lord Jesus Christ shall make war with him and rescue his own. Those that call on Jesus in spirit and in truth shall be saved.

This Is the sound of Mars from 140 million miles by farah22 in space

[–]YurariYurato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cool.

The Apollo 15 Space Postal Scandal: A Dark Chapter in NASA History by farah22 in space

[–]YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Very interesting. I wonder - if they took 400 (purchased) FDCs to the moon, signed and sold them, I think that was not illegal. This is how the FDC market works for signed FDCs (with the exception of taking FDCs to the moon in almost all cases).

The Apollo 15 Space Postal Scandal: A Dark Chapter in NASA History by farah22 in space

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lot of Germans involved in this story, shows NASA was full of nazis that couldn't be trusted.

Webb studies planet K2-18 b again to confirm presence of gas ‘only produced by life’ by [deleted] in space

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Elon Musk one of the "100 most influential AFRICANS!" ~ This man, funded by the US government, responsible in part for rocket launches over the United States, was not even born in the US, but in Africa.... later he moved to Canada, and after that came to the US. by In-the-clouds in space

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was surprised to learn he was not born in America, considering how much government work he does. I just assumed he was an American since birth. Now you bring up his race, claiming he is white and better, but I have more respect for the Africans who remain in the nation where they were born, trying to make their home a better place without draining the wallets of the US taxpayers.

Elon Musk one of the "100 most influential AFRICANS!" ~ This man, funded by the US government, responsible in part for rocket launches over the United States, was not even born in the US, but in Africa.... later he moved to Canada, and after that came to the US. by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It just seems like you thought it was a gotcha, like oh my god hes AFRICAN. Yeah but the white ones are smart to get out and they're better than blacks obviously. Elons teslas suck, his rockets are fake, but whatever. He's not a problem.

Elon Musk one of the "100 most influential AFRICANS!" ~ This man, funded by the US government, responsible in part for rocket launches over the United States, was not even born in the US, but in Africa.... later he moved to Canada, and after that came to the US. by In-the-clouds in space

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You say it is fine, but he does not have to run for president in order to receive more US government funding than the typical American-born citizen will ever receive in their lifetime. Likewise, the leader of Ukraine does not need to be president of the United States in order to receive billions of American money. The United States is being looted and sold out to other nations. Soon, America will fall and be no more.... conquered by its enemies. The individuals that repent and turn to Jesus shall be saved.

Elon Musk one of the "100 most influential AFRICANS!" ~ This man, funded by the US government, responsible in part for rocket launches over the United States, was not even born in the US, but in Africa.... later he moved to Canada, and after that came to the US. by In-the-clouds in space

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's fine, immigration wouldn't be a problem if they were all like him. He's not running for president, and his companies are international.

Dark energy might not be constant after all - First results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument offer hints of new physics. by neolib in space

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dark energy doesn't exist. It is nothing more than a desperate attempt to save an obviously failed model.