Is Tucker Carlson "Cancel Proof"? Carlson’s Ratings Soar As Cancel Mob Eats His Dust

submitted by MassTooter from breakthematrix.com

all 34 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]BravoVictor 14 insightful - 7 fun14 insightful - 6 fun15 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Can't cuck the Tuck.

[–]scrubking 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

We need more people to stand up like him.

[–]ech 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Gets more revenue from cable fees than from ads.

[–]Slutbuster 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Highest ratings in TV news. Uncancellable.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The ratings don't matter if the adds can't sell. They cancelled last man standing while it was the networks highest rated show, and that was purely on Jewish command, there was no advertiser pressure.

[–]Blondi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's simply not true: https://deadline.com/2020/05/last-man-standing-renewed-season-9-the-resident-season-4-fox-2020-2021-season-1202901017/

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It was only renewed after massive public outcry.

[–]Blondi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah, ok. Sorry, I don't follow the show, but that seems really dumb. Why cancel a successful show?

[–]BigNoseFloyd 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Anyone else feel that Tucker is controlled opposition? Anyone else would've long been Epstein'd in his position yet he's still running his mouth unabashed on national TV about the people in power. I think he's pretty knowledgeable but can't help but think there's some insidious shit going on behind the scenes

[–]AddledCorpse 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, you can say that he's controlled opposition.

But if he's woking the F out of people and speaking truths, does it matter?

[–]RuinedRook 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I like what the man says but come on... He's undoubtedly controlled opposition. Wasn't he cheerleader numero uno for invading Afghan/Iraq following 9/11?

[–]Canbot 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

So he literally has to agree with every single one of your views or else he is a shill. Brilliant.

[–]RuinedRook 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you want to put your trust in a trust-fund baby and heir to Swanson foods because of his pointed comments against [insert strawman here] then go right ahead, I reserve the right to criticize the man based on his past actions.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Him and Christopher Hitchens.

Sometimes people just really dislike dictators and their views happen to align with the government at the time.

[–]Dashing-Dove 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think so, and even if it's the case, he's waking up boomers and former NPCs and predisposing them to the realities of race and other forbidden topics. People are listening, and they're seeking answers. He's opening the door to those answers, intended or not. Also, even as a supposed civic nationalist, he punches towards those who deserve punching, cuckservatives and batshit libs alike.

[–]Trajan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Possibly, but the comparison with Epstein is a bit out there. Carlson is a guy on a pretty mundane news network. It’s not like he has novel information unavailable elsewhere. Epstein was a degenerate who likely could have decimated the elitists by releasing what only he knew about them.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Literally everyone on the right that reaches any level of success is called a Jewish pawn. Even Trump.

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Where's the controlled opposition on reddit, twitter, fb, yt, etc? If the platform is left leaning, cancel culture is the norm.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone else feel that Tucker is controlled opposition?

No. Actually I think he's the opposite. He's /ourguy/ deep inside enemy lines.

Anyone else would've long been Epstein'd in his position

That would just turn him into a martyr which would hurt them in the long run.

I think he's pretty knowledgeable but can't help but think there's some insidious shit going on behind the scenes

What makes you think that? Have you read his book?

[–]m68k 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

As long as the advertisers stay, he'll be allow to stay. Remember when Bill O'Reilly was canceled, he was cut because the advertisers left. Ratings alone does not make a person cancel proof.

[–]AllStr8SexIsRape 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Boycott anyone who won't sponsor him.

[–]HiddenFox 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think a boycott is enough. To make an influence on an advertiser you need petitions with signatures and an email/ letter brigade. I know several people who switch from Gillette after the "We can do better" advertisement. The boycott of them did little overall. In fact I just looked at P&G stock and pre c-19 they were at a record high...

[–]NiceDickBro 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Speaking from the outside I honestly don’t know much about him... but anyone who puts a stop to cancel culture in any way has my support

[–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Go look up his recent videos. He says some great shit and he hasn't been a GOP cheerleader as of late. In fact he has been calling them out for being silent in all of this mess. He had one GOP Senator on from Idaho, and really trashed him on the show due to support for them locking up the police officer who killed Rayshard Brooks(sp?).

[–]bagano1 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

TV is dead, long past time guys like him went to Youtube and did 10-20 minute videos you can watch anytime.

[–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, go to Youtube so he can be removed for "racism".

[–]Sw0rdofDam0cles 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Has he mentioned the Jewish question yet?

[–]Themagicalmidget 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I will stand up for anyone who fights cancel culture. Hopefully others will follow, if we show you can still make money, while not falling completely in line to whatever flavor of outrage the mainstream media is vomiting at the given month.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

People need to research more; Tucker is a shill Part 1

/u/Sw0rrdoDam0cles

/u/Themagicalmidget - Tucker was pro-Cancel culture when he covered-up Iran Contra, shiilled for Eliot Abrams and protected the perps behind 9/11

/u/m68k

/u/AllStr8SexisRape

/u/canbot

/u/BravoVictor

Whenever one must refer to Tucker the shill neocon we start off with this: Yeah, because that Black Guy Tucker interviews or the pregnant women telling men to breastfeed isn't a plant pushing division rhetoric.

Tucker pushes all of the state sponsired PsyOps including 9/11.

"These libtards are going crazy the conservacucks say." No, both audiences are falling for their perception management.

Iran deserves to be annihilated. I think they’re lunatics. I think they’re evil."-‪TuckerCarlson‬

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1c1RQfWIAA9Prp?format=jpg&name=900x900

Tucker Carlsons father was the director of Voice of America(US government/CIA propaganda outlet).

No wonder AlexJones‬ is such a big fan.

https://t.co/pDUVAxMfFR?

Neoconservatives have a long history of demonizing and lying about US and Israeli enemies(targets) in service of coups and endless war. And Tucker Carlson will always be a neocon‪.‬

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EAVrk9DX4AA-wdl.png

https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/1svf/tucker_carlson_the_controlled_opposition_neocon/

Caitlin Johnstone, an alternative journalist whose latest article is telling us how great Tucker Carlson is, as does the majority of Alternative media, including Intercept founder Glenn Greenwald, and Alt-Right Red Ice Media among other faux conservative and "right-wing" publications must have stockholm syndrome, for they completely disregard Tucker's history.

As for this shill Caitlin, she is a careerist and is likely hoping to appear on Fox News at some point. If she does she will ignore Tucker's pro-war cred just like @anyaparampil and @ggreenwald and @MaxBlumenthal did. There are very few people in journalism, including alternative that are not bought off. I'd say around three people. But I'm not counting at this point. Any mainstream journalists who get free air-time, including alternative ones are likely controlled in some fashion on what they can and cannot say.

Little Tucker

Tucker supported the Iraq war and said that we should "annihilate Iran". He also has a father who ran Voice of America. And Michael Tracey feels the need to regularly defend him. That now puts his Tulsi stanning into context. It's all controlled oppositions and gatekeeping.

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1092637231884521472

Tucker Carlson excused CIA drug trafficking collaborator, that man was Zionist Jewish Neocon, Elliott Abrams for the Iran-Contra affair because it happened '30 years ago'. LOL

Tucker Carlson has brought up the Stacey Abrams 7 times more than neocon Elliott Abrams on his program since Elliott Abrams was appointed to State Dept In this apologetic segment about Abrams from Feb 13 2019, Tucker brushes aside Iran-Contra because, again, it happened '30 years ago'

A little over 2 years ago Tucker Carlson seemed alarmed and said he was 'baffled' that Trump was considering Elliott Abrams a 'never Trumper' to be in State Dept. Since Elliott Abrams was appointed last month, Tucker hasn't mentioned him except to defend him against IlhanMN, the scary, scary, (/s) muslim "anti-Semite" who said "someone did something on 9/11," yeah she knows, Zionist Jewish dual-Israelis did something. And I have all their names, including the Torah following Jews in Hollywood, FL and Montreal, Canada who made millions off of 9/11 via the stock market through TD warehouse. Nobody investigated them, why?

Not only that but these same Dual-Israelis NOT JESUITS literally boasted about 9/11 in 1998, 1999, 2000, and early 2001 in their corporate titles and blogs. Either naming their companies after WTC or hinting at their demolition.

It's all Kabuki theater. THe NEOCON "Never Trumpers" are shapshifting and playing a part to gain the sympathy of the left against Trump, when Trump himself appoints neocons and is one himself. They control both sides of the political ideology.

On the 2 year anniversary of Tucker Carlson having a discussion with Freemason, and "goldbug" pro-Austrian economist Rand Paul about how Elliott Abrams is a dangerous neoconservative, Tucker tosses to a full blown MIC/State Dept propaganda segment about the Venezuela coup (and still hasn't mentioned Abrams appointment at State), because he's a propagandist.

Preview photos of the Tucker Carlson's Gary Webb hit piece for neocon Jewish Zionist Bill Kristol's Weekly Standard (Tucker's unabashedly deep state errand boy era). Bill Kristol was part of the 9/11 ruse and a staunch pusher of the Iraq war.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EARj2yWUwAAK7FF.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EARj2yXUcAARIxh.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EARj2yZUEAAcxyW.jpg

In conclusion, they give you your heroes!

Tucker is a shill. A 9/11 official conspiracy believer, a pusher of psyops daily and a controlled opposition who speaks some truth to give you the illusion that he represents you, sort of like what Glenn Greenwald does, who he features on his show. Again, they all fail the litmus test when it comes to PSYOPS AND 9/11. They all propagandize noble lies.

Now, JUT BECAUSE THE NEWS or Tucker says something that sounds true such as him having a dumb actor come on and say "men should breast feed", whilst, according to cucks, Tucker then:

"destroys the dumb feminazi SJW PC socialists,"

...isn't grounds for a trustworthy person. Especially considering it is a PSYOP to further divide people with idiotic extremes.

Tucker worked for one of the most notorious neoconservative publications, was good friends with many PNACERS who orchestrated 9/11. He shilled for the Iraq war and he himself appears to be a Neocon.

So why the change you ask. IT IS CALLED COGNITIVE INFILTRATION!!

If anything those two words should be in your wiki. The trotskyite Zionist Jew, Cass Sunstein, knowing who did 9/11, ie. Israeli intelligence, Mossad, the Neocons, who little Tucker covered up for and factions within the CIA and FBI who hired contracts wanted to slowly release the truth to the public in a controlled, limited hangout fashion to BRING BACK TRUST IN THE MEDIA on a partisan level! Tucker was and is now part of this operation. He didn't shill for the destruction of Iran, war in Iraq, cover-up of 9/11 and the Iran-Contra scandal for nothing.

Firstly, cognitive infiltration, outlined by Sunstein and the neocons, if one understands it esoterically, can then interpret as a operation to undermine truth by revealing truth slowly in a controlled fashion over the Obama administration and later Trump administration, but in Trump's case the operation was much different and far easier.

The Neocons would then be seen as self-sacrificing America, attacking the Bush-Cheny conspiracy theory, exposing some aspects not to undermine the economy or peoples trust in the government presently, but in a limited fashion in the past. This also would bring back trust that was lost in the Mockingbird media.

So, now we have actor Trump in office. He of course told you:

"If I become president, I'll tell you who knocked down the towers."

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Part 2

The media did in fact do this, they gave you a limited hangout narrative which was the 28 pages ruse blaming the Saudis. The media also exposed Bush and Cheney, in a limited hangout fashion and the intelligence agencies in the LIHOP psyop (let it happen on purpose). It still held a sliver of truth but nevertheless undermined the full truth and the real perpetrators. No, 9/11 wasn’t orchestrated by Rothschild or Rockefeller or Freemasons in their entirety, or even all Jews for that matter, who could have thought it; no, it was Mossad and 5th column Neoconservative Jews as well as tightly knit group of Dual-Israeli Jewish families who emigrated from Poland and Russia.

Trump becomes president. Mind you, Tucker shilled for Trump as did Alt-Right Duginist David Duke, a Zionist, KKK actor who gets CNN airtime, lmfao.

Trump was tasked and still is tasked with creating division and partisan viewpoints, whilst furthering the partisan populace divide.

So, Trump’s agenda was to MAKE EVERYONE BELIEVE that the media is a, if not THE PRIORITY. It doesn't matter if you believe the so-called left slanted neoliberal news outlets such as MSNBC or CNN or hate the neoliberal neocon right slanted outlets like Fox news. Believing the media as ONLY biased in the ways they interpret stories, even when you classify yourself as a centrist or even worse centrist reactionary, you are STILL under its spell and have forgotten the tactics of cognitive infiltration, Psychological Operations, and Perception Management.

When Trump yells fake news, the left does it too, and then the conspiracy theories from the left and right corporate media thus undermine the true meaning of propaganda and the tactics I have mentioned above.

When true liberals started to realize that Obama was a shill for the Neocons and that the media was an apparatus for Zionists and the CIA, Trump came about to set the record straight and to bring back Trust in the media. Trump calling the media fake means that his die hard supporters believe his recommendation of so-called real news such as Fox and friends as a legitimate source for truth, and the liberals once questioning the whole system see Trump’s attack on CNN and MSNBC, so thusly that must mean they are speaking truth and get sucked into a partisan view. The centrists see Trump as someone who exposes the biases of News forgetting that it is all perception management every minute of the day to undermine critical thought. The media war on Trump is a FAKE war.

Trump has done better than any other president at dividing the country and bringing back trust in the media but with extreme partisan views of the other.

His use of the word hoax and fake, also discredit the real truth seekers who see right through fakery. If you expose fakery, then you must be a Trump supporter the left will say, because Trump says the same crap.

That's cognitive infiltration.

I wonder why Trump appointed a host of Neocons, and then the Neocons attack him on CNN of all places when they were originally on FOX during the Bush era shilling for War.

Easy, cognitive infiltration and using the stigma of Trump to garner support for their cause on the so-called left when Trump is their man anyway.

Oh and yes, this is mostly a Zionist Jewish Dual Israeli job. Cass Sunstein founded this operation. /u/MassTooter

/u/Sw0rrdoDam0cles

/u/Themagicalmidget - TUcker was pro-Cancel culture when he cover-up Iran Contra and protected the perps behind 9/11

/u/m68k

/u/AllStr8SexisRape

/u/canbot

/u/BravoVictor

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So it's your claim that Tucker Carlson, who is paid to host an editorial show, is a shill? Under such broad definitions who isn't a shill? That question isn't rhetorical by the way.

As for researching Tucker. How about I simply judge his statement on their own merit and importance? Which to my current situation are both marginal and non existent.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, a corporate media shill who worked for the neocons and covered-up there crimes. He propagandizes all of the government PsyOps.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone who cover-up Eliot Abrams crimes, propagandizes intervention in Iraq and Iran, and pushes all the government sanctioned PsyOps including 9/11 is a shill for the neoconservative doctrine even if they later pretend not to be.

[–]mrgoober 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"cancel proof" just listen to your words. This is the most sinister disgusting thinking I have ever seen.