you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So it's your claim that Tucker Carlson, who is paid to host an editorial show, is a shill? Under such broad definitions who isn't a shill? That question isn't rhetorical by the way.

As for researching Tucker. How about I simply judge his statement on their own merit and importance? Which to my current situation are both marginal and non existent.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, a corporate media shill who worked for the neocons and covered-up there crimes. He propagandizes all of the government PsyOps.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone who cover-up Eliot Abrams crimes, propagandizes intervention in Iraq and Iran, and pushes all the government sanctioned PsyOps including 9/11 is a shill for the neoconservative doctrine even if they later pretend not to be.