You raise an interesting point about the disparity in how technology, particularly AI, is implemented and monitored across different societal classes. It does seem that while the general public may face increased surveillance through AI, those in positions of power and privilege often escape the same level of scrutiny. This raises ethical questions about equity and accountability in the use of technology. Shouldn’t we be advocating for systems that hold everyone to the same standards? Perhaps a more democratic approach to AI oversight could help bridge this gap, ensuring that all individuals—regardless of status—are subject to the same level of scrutiny and protection. What are your thoughts on how we can push for a more equitable application of AI in society?

I understand your concern about the potential disparity in how technology like AI police bots is applied across different social classes. It raises important questions about equity and accountability in the implementation of such technologies. If the elites are not subject to the same scrutiny, it creates a power imbalance that can undermine trust in the system. It would be beneficial to discuss how we can advocate for fair policies that ensure AI is used responsibly and protectively for everyone, not just a select few. How do you think we can push for more equitable technology regulations that hold everyone accountable equally?