We are on Poal by Lupus_Nubilum in Libertarianism

[–]Drewski 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pinochet. I know it's a meme but still ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

We are on Poal by Lupus_Nubilum in Libertarianism

[–]Lupus_Nubilum[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

who's the "literal fascist"? LOL

We are on Poal by Lupus_Nubilum in Libertarianism

[–]Drewski 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

LOL at calling yourself libertarian while worshiping a literal fascist.

KOL161 | Argumentation Ethics, Estoppel, and Libertarian Rights: Adam Smith Forum, Moscow (2014) ~ Stephan Kinsella, 2014-11-07 (40:13) by JasonCarswell in Libertarianism

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

See also:

The Dumbest Propaganda Video Ever - #PropagandaWatch ~ Corbett Report (15:27)
/s/propaganda/comments/tif/the_dumbest_propaganda_video_ever_propagandawatch/

The Dumbest Propaganda Video Ever - #PropagandaWatch ~ Corbett Report (15:27)
/s/CopyrightActivism/comments/tii/the_dumbest_propaganda_video_ever_propagandawatch/

How Intellectual Property Hampers Capitalism | Stephan Kinsella ~ misesmedia, 2010-10-11 (25:33)
/s/CopyrightActivism/comments/tiq/how_intellectual_property_hampers_capitalism/

"Why Intellectual Property is not Genuine Property," Adam Smith Forum, Moscow ~ Stephan Kinsella 2011-11-01 (47:24)
/s/CopyrightActivism/comments/tiy/why_intellectual_property_is_not_genuine_property/

KOL161 | Argumentation Ethics, Estoppel, and Libertarian Rights: Adam Smith Forum, Moscow (2014) ~ Stephan Kinsella, 2014-11-07 (40:13)
/s/Libertarianism/comments/tj9/kol161_argumentation_ethics_estoppel_and/

Do Kids Need School? Inside the 'Unschooling' Movement by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Hell to the no." <- took me only 4 words

Do Kids Need School? Inside the 'Unschooling' Movement by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]UmamiTofu 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Public schooling is unironically one of the biggest sources of human suffering in wealthy countries

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, incorrect English in that. Very nice. Exactly what I expected.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That would be the "smartest" that YOU can consider.

I rest my case.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can only assume you aren't affected. If you were, then the smartest action would be to disengage. I'm never going to bow to demands. Fuck you.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If an entire population decided to stop paying their taxes, it would be hundreds of millions agaisnt a very small elite minority.

An elite minority with military power exponentially greater than any nation in human history. And they have economic incentives to reduce the population. Given how violently the Democrats are pushing for civil war I have to wonder what they think they gain from it. It might seem like a conspiracy to suggest such a thing, but this is SaidIt and it seem an appropriate place to wax conspiratorial.

I'll just say it. I think it's fucking true. I need allies with whom to reason about peaceful solutions before it's too late.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Remember when the Evangelical lobby were influential among Republicans? Man I miss the days when Republicans sincerely upheld Conservative principles.

I keep hoping we can infiltrate them with Libertarians. You know, people who are GODDAMN SERIOUS about shrinking government, freeing up the private sector, and reducing our military footprint worldwide.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well you both started off spewing ad hominems. None of that was needed to argue a point. Peace, and I agree with you sawboss. The problem with the fake conservatives today, is that they pretend to want small government when that isn't really the case at all. They have effectively hijacked the principles of conservatism and turned them upside down.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But I thought neoconservatives were the good conservatives? Just Kidding. Are there any classical liberals in congress though, doubtful. I like your idea. It only takes a mass awareness to change things. If an entire population decided to stop paying their taxes, it would be hundreds of millions agaisnt a very small elite minority. Hence, why they have to use fear-mongering, cognitive infiltration and endless propaganda.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am glad you feel that way because, after all, you are the one wielding insults as if they were the epitome of wisdom. This must be the sole purview of superior intelligence, undoubtedly.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have a specific plan. The most peaceful resolution I can imagine is starving Washington DC of money by voting in Libertarians and common sense Liberals. There are no Conservatives in America.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck you Jesus!

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Goddamn you really are intellectually diminutive.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But yeah, what shouldnwe do about scum in power both in government and corporate revolving doors that create laws for themselves at the expense of everyone else?

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Their results were FANTASTIC. WTF are you even talking about.

Adolf was Time's man of the year twice because of the economic miracles he worked in post-WW1 Germany. Get your facts straight!

Also, this group is LIBERTARIANISM and this has nothing to do with capitalism or not, and socialism or not.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, great arguments guys. Full of ad hominems. Great work, good job. I understand everything now.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The problem seems to be that you are too retarded to understand that Capitalism is not a complete political system unto itself. Capitalism works just fine under any political system with some amount of private property.

The system this community advocates combines Libertarianism with Capitalism, with the explicit goal of reducing the size and power of government as much as possible. That's why it's Anarcho (without government) Capitalism.

Remember that early 20th century Italy and Germany both combined Capitalism and Socialism. They called their systems Fascism. The results were catastrophic, to say the least. we don't want that.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So you are happy with decreasing wages and encourage the 1% to take even more from the rest and rape-kill-pillage your nation?

That's interesting. Tell me more from your sociopathic tendencies.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Socialism is not incompatible with libertarianism. Actually, the best version of libertarianism is the socialist version. But I'll bet you think socialism is similar to communism. LOL

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Wash away your iniquities and obtain gainful employment you collectivist socialist person.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Take a bath and get a job, you undesirable collectivist socialist person.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How much kool-aid do you drink bro?

Over the past 60 years, the top 1% has accumulated over 90% of all wealth created in the economy.

Oh and the "bottom 90%" that is, the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY are POORER.

Wait a minute, some dude working 60, 70 hours a week trying to make ends meet is impoverishing himself, while the CEO who is playing golf with his buddies laughing about the idea that "wealth trickles down" gets richer by the minute? And that's fine by you? Dude get your head checked.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So basically, the most ruthless asshole who gets the most power should be entitled to enslaving the rest?

Nice mentality bro.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Collectivism is a retarded idea. No one should want it.

In Defense of Capitalism by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Horrux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Capitalism can only perform decently as an economic system if the political system enforces some reasonable degree of socialism.

As, for example, the national socialist party did. It was greatness.

The Origin And Nature Of International Conflict (by Hans-Hermann Hoppe) by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hoppe comes onstage at 5:50

Bret Weinstein: Left and Right Libertarians Should Unite by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't hate you right now. You should feel proud of that.

I'm personally inclined to allow for peaceful voluntary communes as long as they don't intrude on my liberty. That hasn't been the history of things so far though.

Bret Weinstein: Left and Right Libertarians Should Unite by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]happysmash27 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Totally!

As an Anarcho-Communist, my principles are basically libertarianism + "let's give things to each other for free" as a movement. The main difference between my values and Anarcho-Capitalism is mainly that I think land should not be privately owned. This works for both communism and capitalism though: for communists, it means free land one can use to produce free resources, while for capitalists it means easy entrepreneurship, since there is land one can use to start a business not monopolised by companies. I can even talk about communism in the framework of capitalism: Communism = out-compete payed products with free ones. The more I think about it, the more left libertarianism and right libertarianism seem to be able to be the exact same thing.

The opponents of liberty are sowing disinformation across all social media to promote their agendas and justify their power mongering. Is there a moral case for libertarians to do the same? by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]friend 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sowing disinformation is building your support on rotten ground. Like many other destructive strategies, it works best in the short term, and actually backfires long term. Tyrants who plan to eventually go public with their domination don't worry whether their supporters will eventually understand the truth, because by then it will be too late.

The cause of liberty doesn't have this luxury, but since our rulers gain consent by lying, we have a powerful and persuasive message for people who we help to see things clearly. And once someone sees the world as it actually is, they can't unsee it.

Bret Weinstein: Left and Right Libertarians Should Unite by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Presumably we would act together in some way, but how can that work?

Ralph Nader has some interesting thoughts on this. "Breaking Through Power... It's Easier Than We Think."

Bret Weinstein: Left and Right Libertarians Should Unite by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

State action is the cause of the social balkanization. My one plea to every one, left and right and otherwise, is to dis-empower the state. The state is not a surgeon, but an axe murderer. It wields its powers crudely, clumsily, brutally, and unaccountably. People who want to grow state power are either stupid or evil.

Bret Weinstein: Left and Right Libertarians Should Unite by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]James_Kuhn3rd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem with the libertarian movement, is conditions must be right for them/it to exist. By and large, those conditions are gone in this country.

Our founders warned that our constitution is fit only for a moral and religious people. It's wholly unsuited for any other.. It's not coincidence that as we've abandoned the traditional Judeo-Christian values (though not necessarily the religion itself), they've Been replaced with a different god, the omniscient state.. Which ironically, most people agree is needed and necessary.

The government grew from leaving you alone in the Times of the founders, to the behemoth it's become today. A few examples are; controlling who can become a hairstylist or nail salon tech, who is/isn't allowed to dig in their own back yard and where, what things you may teach your children, what cable tv/pharmacology/healthcare/cell phone choices you have, who gets/is required to have a parking sticker, who gets mandatory paid leave for childcare, as well as non academic related considerations for entry into colleges using metrics such as race or zip code, which businesses are allowed/regulated and where are they allowed, what type of light bulb/water heater/ac unit you are allowed to have..

Being libertarian today is looked upon as being cold and indifferent to human suffering. The idea that one's community/religious institution/social club should not only contribute but be the primary vehicle for the care of each other is radical in a day when we are sold a promise that the state can swiftly come to provide aid.. This is so much easier, sounds super effective, and what's more, requires nothing from anyone other than a mantra such as, "I pay my taxes so they can go help those ppl out". Of course not only is it a fraud, in many cases the government picks who can and can't be aided by inhibiting private party civilian rescuers, e.g. the "Cajun navy" or Puerto Rico.

Beyond this, the "left and right" sides of being "libertarian" thing..??. Well I occasionally turn on Free talk live for background noise when I'm stuck doing mindless computational entry, and recently I heard a guest host claim they were libertarian but absolutely believed the state should tax people more in order to hand out more money to those who had less.. I was outraged.. Endorsing that some government entity has the right to take what is mine and give it to someone they deemed worthy based on an arbitrary metric is garbage.. That guy might be many things, but libertarian is not one of them. I'm generally convinced that most left wing policies and ideologies, which may sound humane, kind, and warranted are generally antithetical to the ideas of liberty, human agency, as well as small L libertarianism. Right wing policies can encroach on freedoms as well, but left wing policies generally operate from the premise that the state is this wise Oracle, dispassionate, fair and indiscriminate. That the common good and the collective interest outweighs individual rights or concerns, especially since those opposed to such are just bad actors, unconcerned with the welfare of the others, interested only in themselves..

I love my country, but at some point you have to realize the U.S. was great not because of the things it did, although it did great things. It was great because of the underlying values behind the people. Those values drove them to do great things, not the other way around.

We had thousands of men take up arms, sometimes against their neighbors or their own families to liberate groups of people from tyranny in the past. Now we have groups of people take up arms against statues that serve to remind us that evil lies in the heart of every man, because some of those statues are tributes to that evil.

We used to tar and feather those who told us we couldn't say things or that we didn't have the right to be heard, now we clamour and lobby the watchers to shut down voices that are offensive, that say things we don't like, to move those voices into "speech zones", away from those who might see or hear, not just on campus mind you, have you tried to hold up a sign near a congressperson, especially of certain political persuasions, you can very easily become a felon, and legislating things such as net neutrality... Only good can come from the state further regulating the communication superhighway..

As well, at one point young men ran out of boats knowing they were about to die to storm the beaches of an evil regime, they did it anyway. Today, one storms the beaches by hashtagging your strong belief in climate change or lambasting those who might be skeptical, and feeling good about yourself by putting your plastic in a blue bin so that it gets shipped to some third world shithole to get dumped into their waterways..

No, I don't think the conditions are even remotely conducive for libertarians and the ideas of liberty. In fact, I think it's rather the opposite.. Our country and people are increasingly Balkanized, and probably why we need more havens such as the free state project in New Hampshire. The government accelerates this balkanization.. I mean, what insane govt doesn't even require a common language for it's citizen services, it's no wonder people don't care about the country they live in any longer, there is no common thread among us, not even language..

In the absence of these conditions, society and the people look for explanations for the maladies in life from an incorrect place.. And not only do they seek explanations from the state, they seek Its remedies.. It's why the further socialist we go, the more certain freedoms must and do get curtailed, such as the first and second amendment. For old timers, it's horrifying. For a newer generation, it's a feature, not a bug..

The libertarian alternative to the black sun, the Molon Labe spartan shield. by Lupus_Nubilum in Libertarianism

[–]Lupus_Nubilum[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't found a better image of this symbol without a watermark, anyway this was to illustrate the idea. Maybe I clean the watermark or I make one like this by myself with a vector design program if I had the skills.

The libertarian alternative to the black sun, the Molon Labe spartan shield. by Lupus_Nubilum in Libertarianism

[–]Broken-needles350 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol, adobe watermark

trump supporters by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's even funnier is when people notice you are anti-communist they assume that makes you a republican or conservative. LOL

trump supporters by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

too much statism

trump supporters by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]dark_devil_dd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This seems a little too much

Ancap vs Ancom by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

capitalist USA

LOL

Ancap vs Ancom by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

as happens on socialism

LOL

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]IdleHands 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have deleted /s/physicalremoval without any other reason than "someone said it advocates violence". You selectively enforce the pyramid of debate. You have based the entire site on your personal, subjective judgement.

In the past 6 months I've tried to have a debate with you about the need for proper rules and guidelines but I'm always met with "oh, I believe people will behave themselves".

I think you are naive and makes rushed judgements based on your friends preferences. While the "evidence" presented is laughable, you have a history that makes me think twice about these types of accusation.

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]emperormises 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol the riot server is dead as shit though

not sure the context here but i think we should leave /u/magnora7 alone and not ruin his day

Best Anti-Communist argument on 4chan (Vee) by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]emperormises 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Vee

LP vs Hoppeanism by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not familiar with that. Please explain.

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I said he is not welcome to be mod anymore if he is going to censor people when they disagree with him. That is not a "threat" the way you have been using that word "threatening" without any further context until this moment.

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]IdleHands 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

555-COME-ON-NOW

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He is lying, I know it for a fact because I do not threaten people.

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't threaten him. He is making that up. There is no evidence of it. I have nothing to apologize for.

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No I didn't. Stop making things up without evidence, with the purpose of assassinating my character. Pyramid of debate violation warning 1.

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Cringy.

I thought we didn't believe in "rights"? by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Would we disregard American law then?

LP vs Hoppeanism by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Libertarian Articles of Confederation

Really? You think they are shit?

IMO the principles are generally sound.

However, the unspoken motivation behind them were hypocritical.

Progress is never perfect.

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]IdleHands 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sauce?

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I was threatening no one, and now you're manufacturing BS against me. I don't like these attacks, they're quite transparent and disingenuous. If you can't handle the rules of saidit, then you are welcome to leave.

He left because I wouldn't let him censor my comments. And you deleted a few of my comments too. Unnecessary mod censorship is not tolerated on saidit like it was on reddit.

u/magnora7 by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]Stankmango 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What the dogshitandcum is this all about?

Those who make Ron Paul impossible make Pinochet inevitable by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How?

Ancap vs Ancom by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]RLS89ZX 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Free Market Socialism is a great idea! That's why we desperately need Mutualism alongside Individualist Anarchism far more than ever.

Leftist doublespeak translator by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i wish i could assume that's not the case. this is interesting, maybe i'll come back to it tomorrow. thanks.

Leftist doublespeak translator by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably not, unless they are racist themselves and think that all white people are racist, which I doubt is the case.

Leftist doublespeak translator by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://files.catbox.moe/plulml.png

Does these items effectively exclude white people?

Leftist doublespeak translator by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]happysmash27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At the moment, I am not a member, but I will answer any questions if I can.

Ancap vs Ancom by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]happysmash27 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, by my definitions that is socialism, just the free market variety! It is certainly the only socialism I support – anything else, and it is just as oppressive as forced capitalism…

Leftist doublespeak translator by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you a member and may I ask more questions?

Leftist doublespeak translator by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]happysmash27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. See, for example, the Socialist Rifle Association. Firearms can be used by minorities to protect themselves from others, and can also be used to oppose a forced-capitalist government that forces people to participate in the big machine socialists call "capitalism" via many laws that require one to work for the owner class to make money.

Snakeconomics by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The axes should be the other way around. I read this as follows:

As the economy grows, we throw more commies from helicopters

What I think you mean to say would be:

As we throw more commies from helicopters, the economy will grow

tl;dr: Dependent & independent variables | Algebra (video) | Khan Academy

The left are the meme by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]LordGhoul 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When you confuse the liberal left with some single loud nut bags and tumblr troll accounts you get this collage. Also, red comic sans on green? That's almost worse than this meme itself.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Goodbye

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you are very dumb to put a "delete" button on your site and start to threat people when they use it. You're just an asshole. Hasta la vista, sucker

I thought we didn't believe in "rights"? by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which bodies of law will be drawn from? What is the basis of agreement for choosing those bodies of law?

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because you were censoring others. I was stopping you from censoring people's speech because you disagree with them.

Note I haven't actually banned you yet, and note you actually did already delete 6 of my comments, twice.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ideas that require censorship to exist, and can't withstand criticism, aren't really compatible with saidit.

Said the guy who commented on my posts: "yOu wIlL FoLlOw sItE RuLeS Or lEaVe tHe sItE."

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, sounds like a good plan. Ideas that require censorship to exist, and can't withstand criticism, aren't really compatible with saidit.

Ancap vs Ancom by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not really.

Ancap vs Ancom by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The corporatocracy is the true threat to humanity.

Ancap vs Ancom by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And capitalism. Your capitalist USA is in at least 8 wars now, that we know of.

LP vs Hoppeanism by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Was the American Revolution Fought to Save Slavery?

...in the 1770’s, a major decision was made in the British courts that was instrumental, offered hope to slave communities and had a tremendous impact. James Sommerset was the “erstwhile” slave of American Charles Stewart. Stewart brought Sommerset with him to London in 1769. In September of 1771, Sommerset disappeared and found refuge. On November 26, 1771 Sommerset was kidnapped and placed on board a ship bound for Jamaica where he was likely to be sold. The abolitionist community in London went to work in his support. In 1772, after countless deliberations, the British Lord Chief Justice Mansfield finally ruled in favor of Sommerset. Mansfield said “?the exercise of power of a master over his slave must be supported by the laws of particular countries; but no foreigner can in England claim such a right over a man; such a claim is not known to the laws of England?the Man must be discharged.”

Word spread like wildfire throughout the slave communities in America that Britain was freeing slaves. This was simply not the case as Lord Mansfield went to great lengths to try to stress the importance of this particular case and not a judgment of slavery overall. But the interpretation was broad and the perception was that freedom was more likely to be with the British than with the American colonists.

The writing was on the wall after this case. Slavery would not be tolerated on British soil, and would in time be abolished in British colonies. This was unacceptable to the southern colonies, as slavery was the foundation of the southern economy.

This is also consistent with one of the most popular philosophical ideas of the time. Particularly John Locke’s trinity, “life, liberty, and property.”

Crucially, the idea of property rights and ownership. It's not difficult to understand why this was popular, or difficult to imagine how it was applied.

The ratified version of this idea that is contained in the Constitution was modified to the "pursuit of happiness".

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok. We will migrate to other platform. Zero chance to be here with you bashing on our posts

I thought we didn't believe in "rights"? by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What are commies if not humans?

I'd like to give them a chance to redeem themselves before throwing them. Am I too soft to be a Hoppean?

I thought we didn't believe in "rights"? by sawboss in Libertarianism

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just to start with the obvious ones:

  1. Who owns the private courts?
  2. What authority do they have?
  3. Where does that authority come from?
  4. How is the judgment of a private court enforced?

lol by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No I really didn't.

our philosophy by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think so. Source?

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm admin of this site. You will follow site rules or leave the site.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't delete my comments.

I'm mod of this sub. I will delete your comments if i consider appropriate

H O P P E A N P H Y S I C A L R E M O V A L by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't call myself a commie and never have... god these childish fictitious attacks get a little old

LP vs Hoppeanism by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The articles of confederation endorses the slavery principle.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you don't want to discuss, then don't respond. Don't delete my comments.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't want discuss with you, simple as that. You don't even put arguments. I only want post my links and my memes on my sub

our philosophy by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's merely one type. Calling people an idiot is an actual ad hominem, btw.

lol by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No it's not. Learn what an ad hominem is before you try and use it in discussion.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, I was commenting on your character and the type of things you choose to post, that's hardly spam. This isn't a place where you can just censor anyone who makes you mad, especially if they have a valid point. You are open to criticism, you have to accept that in order for open discussion to occur.

Plus you deleted all my other comments too. Don't do that.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Boy you just push this stuff all day long, eh?

This isn't a comment who want to debate, you're just spamming here, so i will delete your comments if i consider appropriate

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey! Stop removing comments that disagree with you or else I may have to unmod you. Deleting comments just because they disagree with you is very much against the spirit of saidit. I will take action if you're only here to push an agenda and censor all those who disagree with you. That is not open debate. That is not what we created saidit for.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And don't delete comments that criticize your memes. You'd think a "libertarian" would understand that and be able to handle criticism.

And you think you'd have the sense to realizing deleting admin comments probably isn't a good way to win anyone over.

our philosophy by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This whole sub looks like ancaps trying to claim all of libertarianism for themselves lol

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are posting on my saidit. Can't handle my criticism? Get out

This is not your safe-space. You are open to criticism. Deal with it.

For A “Libertarian Alt-Right” by [deleted] in Libertarianism

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I post only in my sub. Don't like? Just unsubscribe and get out