RR_2023

I remember talking to a very distant relative (wife of a step-brother) who lived out East. She was some prosecutor and boasted about prosecuting these kinds of cases. I asked about the possibility of some malware downloading it. She said that wasn't possible and you had to "click" on something for it to happen. I don't know much about P2P sharing, but if I was wanting to distribute something verboten like that, seems like that would be a great way to do it. Sometimes I don't even bother trying to "research" something - all it takes is a little mental exercise. If that is possible, then it probably happens.

And all this exuberance about "child porn" has always felt strange to me. Like a witch hunt. Given that we know the elites are controlling people with it, they need the outrage about it. Another mental exercise, what if it became normal and legal? Like they have done with various other forms of deviancy (LGBT, etc...) Then wouldn't they lose control over those politicians they are blackmailing?

As for the morality of it, sure, if you can make the case about children being harmed, that justifies it. But what about an AI just making new images? Would they be actual "child porn" at that point? And who would judge if it was (and what candidates would step up for that job, eh? LOL!!!!!) How many pixels could change before it wasn't "illegal"? Would children be harmed? Only with the argument that it would some how encourage bad behavior.