all 47 comments

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (30 children)

Unpopular opinion but this type of protest or activism isn't really fruitful. Better to go the NJP route and organize, form communities and expand your network. The stage for activism isn't here it.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

If it was useless the state wouldn't be using a bunch of resources to stop them, along with mobilising the millions of journos on twitter reporting it pretending it's something more than mundane oppression IE 'FOILING A TERRORIST PLOT'.

I agree Patriot Front aren't political but they moralise normal people and give a beacon to flock to for people, they are basically a marketing firm for nationalist ideas. Also everyone in PF is a supporter of the NJP, they go to the meetings and such. When NJP are organising on the ground doing more community work as well as political work who do you think is with them? It's PF guys.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I agree Patriot Front aren't political but they moralise normal people and give a beacon to flock to for people,

You do no service to yourself or to the cause by sitting in jail and paying a shitton of court fees. The time for protests is not here yet. That comes when you have a large established movement, political parties and some elite backers.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

How do you think a large established movement, political parties and elite backing come about? This is just more 'do nothing and everything will magically fall into place'ism.

The NSDAP didn't have a single penny from any elites until it became clear they were going to become the rulers of Germany, their 'elite backers' were simply giving them money in the hopes it would protect them IE out of fear. Why would they give us money when they benefit from the system and we're against the system? They will only give us money in the last few months before we're in power like the cowards they are. The large established movement is built through organisation, just doing nothing has never spontaneously caused a movement to emerge. Movements are built from the ground up.

The NSDAP started with 5 men in a room, the Ba'athists started with as many in a pub, the Legionaries with Codreanu alone at university. If you told them to just do nothing until randomly there's elites and millions of people already supporting them and they can just jump on the bandwagon they'd tell you you're retarded.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm not saying that at all. I agree that you have to do rallies and street fights eventually. It's that you can only do so when you have achieved a level of success and establishment. Hitler and his guys weren't locked in jail for decades. They got quick because they had many sympathetic elites in the Prussian aristocracy, the military establishment, and the government.

They also had the active support of a significant chunk of the population, about 10-15% throughout the 20s that sympathized with their demands and were willing to donate money and bat for them.

WNs in America don't have any of that yet. So, doing street fighting and protests is just an invitation for ruin. It's better to build up those support bases first and then go to the street protest phase.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So how exactly do you think PF, NJP etc get more supporters if people aren't showing physical presence doing protests, demonstrations etc? PF grew exponentially from being a few guys that left National Vanguard (Vanguard America? Idk exactly the name of whatever it was) because they were doing their little flash mobs and such that they used for publicity. If they were just doing graffiti, leaflets/posters etc they wouldn't have nearly as many members.

Actually going out on the streets as a group is how you attract people.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do what NJP is doing and hold real life meetings and conferences in villages and suburbs.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

NJP are also doing irl demonstrations/protests in Waukesha and Fargo

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

If it was useless the state wouldn't be using a bunch of resources to stop them, along with mobilising the millions of journos on twitter reporting it pretending it's something more than mundane oppression IE 'FOILING A TERRORIST PLOT'.

The state and Jewish power does this because it is a useful opportunity to smear nationalists and nationalism. So why would a group give them what they want? What exactly is the objective in these demonstrations and what evidence is there that these demonstrations have a net positive effect, or any positive effect? They certainly didnt have a positive effect in Charlottesville.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Wasn't a demonstration, they showed up to protest paedophile parade. The purpose that serves is to moralise the local community and get other people involved and it works hence the repression.

The jews don't want all their paedo parades having people showing up protesting against them which is why they have a bunch of police protecting them all. They did the same thing in Ukraine.

I think continually showing up is the best thing to do because it's going to create a common consciousness that yes everyone hates paedos but the police and government protect them with oppressive tyranny. This harms the legitimacy of the state in the people which increases the potential for revolutionary organising. Also costs them a bunch of money to keep arresting people for literally no reason. There's no downsides as long as people don't actually do anything that can be intentionally misconstrued IE cross state lines and fight antifa = 'conspiracy to riot' which is what got RAM fucked. The PF guys didn't fight any antifa hence they can't catch any charges, the only issue for them is a couple guys might get doxxed which nobody even cares about anymore.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Regardless of what their intention was, the net result was international headlines about how police broke up an attempt by "white supremacists" to riot and or attack a "parade". They are also all being doxxed and put on Merrick Garfinkle lists. The point I'm making is that any public attempts to organize or demonstrate should be put through a cost benefit analysis that takes into account the world we live in and how such displays will be spun and propagandized by Jewish power.

Trump was initially elected(and yes it turned out he was controlled opposition but thats besides the point) not because of any such displays, but because of widespread white disgust and anger over the destruction of their countries and society. Since then Jewish power has doubled down on destroying their society and we are beginning to see the widespread results of their misanthropy and incompetence. So as frustrating as it may seem, in terms of public demonstration probably the best thing to do for the time being, is do nothing, at least publicly. Or at the very least be extra careful what you do publicly and understand how it will inevitably be spun. There's a famous quote that I believe is attributed to Sun Tzu but is generally just common sense. 'when your enemy is a mistake, dont interrupt him'. Jewish power is failing spectacularly right now.

EDIT: I will say that the "it's ok to be white" signs and posters are extremely effective, if mainly because of the response they provoke, so there are some things that can be done publicly that have a positive effect.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Problem with your paragraph is that it's based on cope rather than any understanding of the history of revolutions. 'Do nothing and powerful people will magically be overthrown' is essentially what you're saying, it's just the mythology of normies one day waking up and spontaneously doing a revolution.

Imagine telling the Nazis to just do nothing in the middle of Weimar, it's absurdity. Did they sit down and do nothing because the German people would spontaneously rise up against Weimar degeneracy or were they the tip of the spear organising the revolution? There can be no resistance unless our guys do it, the normies aren't going to organise themselves they require a boots on the ground vanguard that are outside fighting for the public square on behalf of the ordinary people. Only then will ordinary people have the courage to come out and support them.

All Eeyoreposting and naysaying does, like the fags at DailyStormer and other shit tier sites like that do, is serve to demoralise people who would otherwise be willing to actually take action to help their people rather than circlejerking online and pretending to be sleeper agents which in reality is just a rationalisation of being too much of a coward to do anything so instead creating an imaginary scenario where some magical revolution will appear out of thin air.

If you personally don't think it's possible to win if you take action irl that's fine, don't do it. But going around trying to encourage everyone else to just Do Nothing and that is how they will win is preposterous.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Problem with your paragraph is that it's based on cope rather than any understanding of the history of revolutions. 'Do nothing and powerful people will magically be overthrown' is essentially what you're saying, it's just the mythology of normies one day waking up and spontaneously doing a revolution.

The Soviet Union didnt collapse because some "revolutionaries" overthrew it. It collapsed onto it's own rotten core. It was a system based on lies, not unlike our current system, only our current system is even more unsustainable. I think some of you guys are obsessed with myths about a few hardcore types causing revolutions, but reality is always way more complicated. There's a danger of obsessing over history and always using past examples as a guide for how to proceed in the present and future. Times and events can, and more often than not are, unprecedented. Especially with technology advancing so rapidly.

I dont speak out about this shit because I want to be a revolutionary. I see what is happening right now as a simple case of self defense and self preservation. I'm a pragmatist. If revolution is what it takes to defend myself and my people than so be it. If or when it requires risk or even self sacrifice, so be it, but I'm always skeptical of people who are in it for the revolution, with revolution being the end itself as much as the means to an end. That seems like Jewish thinking.

Im not saying any of this applies to you personally. I dont know you, but you do seem a little too invested in using the Nazis or fascists as some kind of a template. The modern day west, especially America, is a hell of a lot different from 1920s Germany and things that worked there could have an opposite effect, especially since our ruling class are dominated by Jews who see everything through the prism of the rise of the Nazis. Seems to me that approach just plays right into their hands.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The Soviet Union didnt collapse because some "revolutionaries" overthrew it. It collapsed onto it's own rotten core. It was a system based on lies, not unlike our current system, only our current system is even more unsustainable.

This is just rhetorical fairytales completely lacking in substance. You just say these things because they make you feel good like somehow we have the truth on our side so then liberal capitalism will collapse magically and we will be in power magically or something. It's nonsense, our society is in total disarray but the institutions themselves look even more powerful than any that have ever existed throughout history. These are the exact opposite conditions that revolutionaries look for, these have been engineered. All the signs of collapse we see are ones that suppress Social Capital but have little to no effect on political institutions, the only way out of this is through. We have to be extremely active in being involved in every civic association that exists and be the only people organising. One of the benefits of low social capital is that we have low competition, the NSDAP for example had to compete with many bourgeois parties, fake nationalists, marxists etc who were all able to organise easily due to the high Social Capital environment. We are in the age of individuals having their own special snowflake ideas and not being associated with any political groups, which means if we are the people organising we're the only game in town and we can create a parallel society of 'artificial' high Social Capital. This is the foundation of jewish power actually, known as the Kehillah.

I think some of you guys are obsessed with myths about a few hardcore types causing revolutions, but reality is always way more complicated.

No it's not, every single revolution was caused by an organised group of extremely motivated men. The Soviet Union itself came into being because of 'a few hardcore types'. Their party was not even 1/10th as popular as the NSDAP was and they still managed to take power because they had concentrated power in Moscow and St Petersburg in military guys and workers who were able to take the cities for them. I don't know what you've been reading that makes revolutions about 'complicated' and non-material realities but they're not true. Every revolution has been about real life groups fighting for power not random happenings nobody understands because one day random people who have no association with each other just find themselves in positions of power. The only ones we can apply to our own organising are the fascist ones because they're the only ones that fit us IE grassroots, popular organising with little-to-no funding. All others have come out of elite secret societies, the military, international funding etc which obviously we don't have on our side.

There's a danger of obsessing over history and always using past examples as a guide for how to proceed in the present and future.

Another empty rhetorical statement. 3 sentences in a row that actually said nothing that was practical, just throwing out platitudes about how you're right just because you say you are when in reality these tidbits are neither true nor valuable for understanding anything.

Times and events can, and more often than not are, unprecedented

Yes and revolutionaries capitalise on events by being organised and prepared. Bolshevik revolution, and the death of von Hindenburg are fine examples.

If revolution is what it takes to defend myself and my people than so be it.

Great, so then start studying fascists. I recommend 'The Civic Foundations of Fascism' and 'Bowling for Hitler/Fascism' as a starting point.

If or when it requires risk or even self sacrifice, so be it, but I'm always skeptical of people who are in it for the revolution, with revolution being the end itself as much as the means to an end. That seems like Jewish thinking.

What does this even mean? You seem to be specialising in substance-less rhetoric in this entire comment. It's 'jewish thinking' to want to kick jews that are genociding our race out of power and rule our own countries? How do you even think up this nonsense?

Im not saying any of this applies to you personally. I dont know you, but you do seem a little too invested in using the Nazis or fascists as some kind of a template.

Because I've studied revolutions and found that the only one analogous to our situation has been Germany and Italy. Codreanu's organisations in Romania too but they didn't achieve revolution. If the Bolsheviks were analogous to our situation then I'd be telling people to study the Bolshevik revolution, same with the Taliban or the IRA, or Castro and Che, the French revolution etc. None of them are though, learning about them is basically a hobby or historical curiosity for the most part. There's not much that can actually be applied from any of them, except the fascist way of organising which can be applied to us 1:1.

The modern day west, especially America, is a hell of a lot different from 1920s Germany and things that worked there could have an opposite effect, especially since our ruling class are dominated by Jews who see everything through the prism of the rise of the Nazis.

How? How will organising communities to actively oppose the people in power and give the masses a rallying point achieve the opposite effect of strengthening liberalism and jewish power? You are just saying things with literally no reasoning, evidence, or even seemingly thought behind them.

Seems to me that approach just plays right into their hands.

Yes which is why intelligence agencies advocate everyone to organise under peaceful nationalist political parties, it's why the police don't suppress us, it's why our governments don't allow us to register as parties, it's why the media never attacks us. Us organising against them is exactly what they want.

[–]pcpmasterraceDer Ewige Anglo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

People are reading The Populist Delusion.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Have you read it? How does he try to explain away nationalist revolutionary organisations? Does he just ignore them or pretend they were actually emerging elites doing the Jouvenalian thing?

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You just say these things because they make you feel good like somehow we have the truth on our side so then liberal capitalism will collapse magically and we will be in power magically or something.

It's not magic that will make it collapse, it's reality, it's math. The US is nearly 30 trillion dollars in debt and counting, that's an unprecedented hole for zog to climb out of. We are seeing record inflation, the stage is set for an eventual collapse of the dollar at a time the neocons are using the US to wage wars(unsuccessfully) with everybody. The US is highly divided, and a silent majority of whites are sick to death of this racial grievance bullshit and endless anti white incitement and even open discrimination.

It's nonsense, our society is in total disarray but the institutions themselves look even more powerful than any that have ever existed throughout history.

You honestly think that can be sustained with all the above mentioned problems? I would be pretty amazed.

There's a danger of obsessing over history and always using past examples as a guide for how to proceed in the present and future.

Another empty rhetorical statement. 3 sentences in a row that actually said nothing that was practical, just throwing out platitudes about how you're right just because you say you are when in reality these tidbits are neither true nor valuable for understanding anything.

It's not an empty rhetorical statement. There are countless examples of this right up to the present day. WW2 is a great one. The French prepared for a coming war with Germany using WW1 as a guide. How did that work out for them? The Germans by contrast completely scrapped previous doctrine and came up with something new and unexpected. This has happened continually throughout history. So if you want to use history as a guide, there's a pretty consistent takeaway.

Times and events can, and more often than not are, unprecedented

Yes and revolutionaries capitalise on events by being organised and prepared. Bolshevik revolution, and the death of von Hindenburg are fine examples.

So you agreed with my statement, then used historical examples of how to proceed.

If revolution is what it takes to defend myself and my people than so be it."

Great, so then start studying fascists. I recommend 'The Civic Foundations of Fascism' and 'Bowling for Hitler/Fascism' as a starting point.

Why would I use two failed movements as a starting point? Also, the Bolsheviks were funded by Jewish wealth, not exactly something you can rely on. Also, the key word I used was IF. I don't believe a "revolution" is what it takes and in fact believe that attempting such a thing would likely backfire in the near term. They're fucking everything up left and right, so why would I intervene if it was just as likely to help them, as Charlottesville did? Timing is everything. Again since you are into historical examples from the Nazi era, imagine if the opposition to the Nazis attempted to publicly organize in 1936, how do you think that would have worked out for them? They would have been completely crushed. It would have been doing the Nazis a favor. A better tactic right now would be along the lines of the French yellow jackets or even something akin to the civil rights movement, except for whites and in clear opposition to Jewish power and authoritarianism, hence why I support the "it's ok to be white" messaging and think its extremely effective. Also, during the civil rights "struggle", blacks always had the option of simply returning to their home continent and peoples, European peoples don't have that option. These are the societies we built, and in the case of Europe lived in for tens of thousands of years, so there is nowhere to return to, so our moral and practical argument is far greater than blacks had back then.

There's not much that can actually be applied from any of them, except the fascist way of organising which can be applied to us 1:1.

Again, this is where I disagree, I dont think it can be applied to us 1:1, certainly not in America, I dont know as much about Europe. Times and are completely different, the people you are trying to persuade are completely different, the technology the state can bring against you to monitor and supress organizing is completely different, as well as their ability to propagandize and spin events to the masses, as these patriot front dudes just found out. Not to mention their ability to use social media as a weapon against you, to astroturf riots and organized violence on a whim, as 2020 showed.

You can accuse me of speaking in platitudes or generalizations, but I can specifically lay out all the differences between 1920's Germans and 2022 Americans and the situation both find themselves in, and these differences are profound. What worked in one situation with one group of people will not necessarily work with the other and could have the opposite effect. I can specifically list these differences if you dont believe they exist or matter.

I'm not saying all this to blackpill people. In fact as I have pointed out I think it's almost a done deal that the system will collapse and the Jewish elite have already massively overplayed their hand as it always does. One major difference between now and these past revolutions you bring up is in the past the differences were mainly ideological. Today it goes way beyond that. A powerful group of Jews appear to be actively attempting to ethnically cleanse planet earth of European peoples, so this isnt just some stupid my ideology is better than your ideology bullshit, it is a situation of either allowing another group to destroy you, or preventing that. Every white person on earth will be effected by this and has motivation to oppose it, along with any non whites that aren't genocidal sociopaths, so I'm tired of the alt right always picking fights with other whites. Every white person should be our ally, or at least be given that option. So why make them your enemy and back them up against a wall and antagonize them into opposing you?

[–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The Soviet Union didnt collapse because some "revolutionaries" overthrew it. It collapsed onto it's own rotten core.

The Soviet Union collapsed because a liberal reformer undermined the foundations of its political system. In the US, what we are seeing instead is an increasing centralisation.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is probably true to a large extent, which is why I dont like using historical examples to explain the present. Things are always a lot more complicated than X happened in 19** and it looks superficially like now so X is happening now.

[–]disidentHRNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All Eeyoreposting and naysaying does, like the fags at DailyStormer and other shit tier sites like that do, is serve to demoralise people who would otherwise be willing to actually take action to help their people rather than circlejerking online and pretending to be sleeper agents which in reality is just a rationalisation of being too much of a coward to do anything so instead creating an imaginary scenario where some magical revolution will appear out of thin air.

To be honest, Daily Stormer had their Book Clubs, they posted leaflets, exercised and shit. I assume that's where RAM got their idea for active clubs. They also infamously organized a protest against Tanya Gersh who was harrassing Richard Spencer's family, which resulted in Anglin having to pay shitton of money to her, which is why I think Book Clubs were never serious about the real organizing.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pre-Charlottesville is irrelevant

[–]pcpmasterraceDer Ewige Anglo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

the net result was international headlines about how police broke up an attempt by "white supremacists" to riot and or attack a "parade".

They always say shit like that, regardless of the circumstances. To anyone who spends two minutes looking into the story and what they were protesting, they come off really well.

They are also all being doxxed and put on Merrick Garfinkle lists. The point I'm making is that any public attempts to organize or demonstrate should be put through a cost benefit analysis that takes into account the world we live in

It's not what I would do, but if someone is willing to put themselves out there like that, then they deserve nothing but respect.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Most conservatives just call them feds.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ironic because badjacketing has always been a fed tactic. They used to infiltrate groups and be spread rumours so and so is a fed and now they just have blackmailed paedophiles do it on social media instead. Someone ought to invent a virus that pretends to be homosexual, tranny, catboy, femboy, child porn that destroys people's PCs, phones etc so we can get rid of conservatives off the internet forever.

[–]disidentHRNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To the local community this is nothing but a bad look for the police, protecting the pedophiles and arresting people opposing the pedophiles. There is no way this can look good for them, hence they have to lie that it's a terrorist plot (even though there are no weapons involved). At very least it will sow distrust of the people with these institutions which are supposed to protect and serve them.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

General thoughts on this/discussion?

It was just to stop them from protesting the paedophile shit; the charges are being dropped as we speak because there is no case, obviously.

[–]WhiteZealotWhite Nationalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blatant violation of the 1st Amendment. PF has never rioted nor supported rioting. The government had no reason to believe they were going to do anything other than what they've always done, which is lawful demonstration and speech. I hope PF sues the crap out of the government and wins big.

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

this one shitlib attending the pride event talked to a cop there, apparently feds in their chats tipped the cops off about the event. white dissidents need to either get competent or give up this isn't a game

https://twitter.com/AlissaAzar/status/1535745887174987777?s=20&t=pkSZ60hDlaPNuDwbJNAYoQ

[–]Fonched 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly this knowledge won't be mainstream. The left is celebrating like PF legit was trouble for the Pride event, and no shady elements were present within the organization/surroundings.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    At this point if you're an American pro-white, jew aware etc there's no excuse to be anything but a 'wignat'. All NRx, groypers, religious, racist liberal, fedposty etc stuff has shown to consistently be subversive, grifting, dead ends completely filled with bad actors, feds, jews, shills, and naysayers. The only people who actually are doing anything real are PF and NJP/TRS.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Reminder that only 22% of Americans are catholic and 80% of them don't take the faith seriously. Pope Francis sees the tradcath faction as an embarrassment and is actively trying to sideline and isolate it.

    Anyone who sells you an ideology based on tradcath is either an online larper or a grifter.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Did you just copy paste Striker's telegram post lol

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Yup. :)

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    based

    [–]shilldetector 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Fuentes is a creepy narcissistic amoral degenerate Mexican. James is just a white dude upset about what he sees and speaking out against it while at least making some(largely unsuccessful) attempt to not completely deplatform himself. Be careful of purity spirals. There's a lot of Vincent James' out there, and we need them.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Nick Fuentes

    He's always been a grifter and a faggot.

    [–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I never liked him, always thought he was an immature, dimwitted grifter, but when I heard the phone call he did with the kid where he tried to insult him for doing any kind of manual labor while essentially bragging about banging his catboy, that sealed it for me. He is a corrupt effeminate catty elitist third world bitch. He would be perfectly fine with the Mexican societal model of corrupt elites lording over the poor illiterate masses.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I've always hated him. He does not nor ever has had anything of substance to say. He got owned in almost every debate he did with rightists and reasonably smart leftists.

    [–]Nombre27 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    What would leftists do in such a situation? They would clash with the cops, organize legal support, dox the cops and parade outside their home, organize further protests and so on.

    [–]disidentHRNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    What a naive comment.

    Firstly, they would never clash with the police, especially if the police is protecting the pedophiles.

    Secondly, doxing the cops doesn't do shit, what cop did ever have repercussions when doxed? They're not losing their jobs, you know that, right? And neither do the mobs attack them or whatever.

    Thirdly, they do so because they're allowed to do so. Pretending antifa gatherings can't be Charlottesville'd is frankly retarded. We've seen how BLM protests can easily be dispersed if there's any will/motivation to do it.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Good to know.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yeah, like I said there was no actual charges against them. They were just having their first amendment right taken from them IE the people aren't allowed to protest against paedophilia parades.