REPORTED for ADVOCATING violence

Fun fact: chimeras... are humans... with human DNA. They're people who start as twins and then early in development, they fuse into one person.

So they're legally a woman ... But they're a man, but not legally?

I don't get hung up on whether people with DSDs are "a woman" or "a man". Excluding chimeras, they are biologically male or (XOR - exclusive or) female. I don't see any reason why people with CAIS should legally be considered male when I think about all the legal contexts in which sex is relevant. Doesn't change the fact that they are biologically male.

What are you even objecting to in my argument? The fact that I'm acknowledging that they're males when they are? It's interesting how CAIS and other conditions like it affect human sexual development. Females can have CAIS too, but often there are no symptoms because they are female anyway and their sexual development barely involves androgens. A female with CAIS is XX and develops all their female reproductive organs properly. Is your argument that there's no difference between a female with CAIS and a male with CAIS?

edit: You know what, I'll even concede that in the social sense, SOME male people with DSDs can be considered "women" because of how highly charged that word is with social implications. I don't know enough about female DSDs to say whether any of those people (excluding chimeras / people with fucky chromosomes) could be, at least legally and possibly socially "men". It doesn't matter and I don't care. But biologically they are male or female. Again, these arguments are in reference to people with a typical XX or XY karyotype.

And again, none of this is relevant in a normal social interaction. Only in the contexts of medicine, sex and reproduction, and the law.